Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 14-4694
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:05-cr-00306-HEH-1)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
Travis Williams-Jeffers appeals his twelve-month sentence
imposed upon revocation of his supervised release.
On appeal,
Although notified
district
We affirm.
court
has
broad
discretion
when
imposing
United States
We will affirm a
the
unreasonable.
Cir. 2006).
plainly
applicable
statutory
maximum
plainly
unreasonable,
initial
not
we
first
assess
and
inquiry,
we
take
more
the
sentence
for
Id. at 438-39. In
deferential
appellate
United
States v. Moulden, 478 F.3d 652, 656 (4th Cir. 2007) (internal
quotation marks omitted).
a
district
court
is
guided
by
2
the
Chapter
Seven
policy
statements
in
the
federal
Guidelines
manual,
as
well
as
the
supervised
reasonable
if
Guidelines
range
release
the
district
and
court
adequately
sentence
is
properly
calculates
explains
the
procedurally
sentence
the
after
3553(a)
factors.
18
U.S.C.
3583(e)
(2012);
United States v. Thompson, 595 F.3d 544, 547 (4th Cir. 2010).
receive
maximum.
the
Crudup,
sentence
461
F.3d
imposed,
at
440.
up
to
the
Only
if
statutory
sentence
is
Id. at 439.
this
Id.
case,
the
record
reveals
sentence
is
not
no
procedural
or
plainly
unreasonable.
In
affirm
the
district
courts
order.
This
We
court
the right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for
further review.
filed,
but
counsel
believes
that
such
petition
would
be
We dispense with
oral
contentions
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
this
court
are
and
AFFIRMED