Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 12-1027
Submitted:
Decided:
Danielle
L.C.
Beach-Oswald,
BEACH-OSWALD
IMMIGRATION
LAW
ASSOCIATES, PC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner.
Stuart F.
Delery, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer P. Levings,
Senior
Litigation
Counsel,
Nancy
K.
Canter,
Office
of
Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
PER CURIAM:
Zachary
Cameroon,
Kongnso
petitions
Immigration
for
Appeals
Kehla,
review
(Board)
of
native
an
and
order
dismissing
of
his
citizen
the
Board
appeal
from
of
of
the
Factual
findings
are
affirmed
if
supported
by
substantial evidence.
evidence
finding
adjudicator
contrary.
unless
would
the
have
been
Therefore,
we
was
such
that
compelled
review
to
an
any
reasonable
conclude
adverse
to
the
credibility
judge
must
provide
specific,
cogent
reasons
for
We recognize that
improbable
testimony
credibility determination.
can
support
an
adverse
aliens
entire
testimony
regarding
past
persecution.
An
U.S.C.
1158(b)(1)(B)(iii)
(2006);
see
also
Djadjou v. Holder, 662 F.3d 265, 272-74 (4th Cir. 2011) (case
citations omitted).
(denial
of
asylum
relief
can
be
based
solely
upon
an
have
and
reviewed
conclude
the
that
record
there
and
was
considered
substantial
Kehlas
evidence
of
Kehlas
immigration
claim
judges
for
relief.
consideration
We
of
also
note
Kehlas
that
the
testimonial
with
oral
argument
because
the
facts
and
We
legal
PETITION DENIED