You are on page 1of 10

Request for Information 410921

Request for Information 410921


Title 2013 Q3 Morocco INWI FM project evaluation
Preview Date Not Specified
Open Date Immediately
Close Date 03-OCT-2113 21:47:17
Time Zone
Event Not Specified
Note Not Specified

Dr
a

ft

This document has important legal consequences. The information contained in this document is
proprietary of LE_SC_A001. It shall not be used, reproduced, or disclosed to others without the express
and written consent of LE_SC_A001.

Proprietary and Confidential

Page 1 of 10

Request for Information 410921

Table of Contents
1 Header Information.........................................................................................................................................3
1.1 General Information...............................................................................................................................3
1.2 Collaboration Team................................................................................................................................3
1.3 Terms.....................................................................................................................................................3
1.4 Requirements.........................................................................................................................................3
1.5 Response Rules......................................................................................................................................9

Dr
a

ft

2 Invited Suppliers...........................................................................................................................................10

Proprietary and Confidential

Page 2 of 10

Request for Information 410921

1 Header Information
1.1 General Information
Title 2013 Q3 Morocco INWI FM project evaluation
Description Not Specified
Preview Date Not Specified
Open Date Immediately
Close Date 03-OCT-2113 21:47:17
Time Zone
Buyer 00134732,
Response Style Blind
Email tangwenyong@huawei.com
Security Level Public
Operating Unit OU_SC_A001
Approval Status Approved
Sourcing Project Not Specified
Event Not Specified
Negotiation Style SPE-Specific Template
Note

Not Specified

No

Task

BUYER_OUTSOURCIN No
G_PRODUCT
ENGINEER_TQC_COM No
PONENT
No

1.3 Terms
Ship-To Address
Payment Terms
FOB Refer to Agreement
Currency USD (US Dollar)
1.4 Requirements
Display scoring criteria to Suppliers

Target
Date

Evaluatio
n
Evaluatio
n
Full

Dr
a

00069701,
Ding Junjin
00147534,
Mr. Leng Hexiang
00134732,
Tang Wenyong
00223035,
Mr. Cao Songfeng

Approver Access

ft

1.2 Collaboration Team


Member
Position

View
Only

Bill-To Address
Carrier
Freight Terms TBD
Price Precision Any

No

1./Technique performance
Section Weight 6
1.1Key technical personnel(mandatory)Assessment factors:1) Technical Qualification of the key staff;2)
The stability of key staff within the project; (stability means not resign or not moved to other project)3)
The actual delivery performance of the key staff during the project implementation;
Quantitative Assessment:As per the methodology of Resource quality evaluation as defined in iFriend
system, Resource Quality = skills qualification rate of staff * 20% + stability of staff * 30% +
performance score of staff * 50% ;1) If Resource Quality 60%, score = Resource Quality 100 ; 2) if
Resource Quality 60%, score = "0";skills qualification rate of staff = number of suplier key staffs who
pass the qualification of Huawei in ifriends / number of supplier all staffs in ifriends * 100stability of staff
= number of supplier key staffs who stays in project during the whole evaluation period/ number of
supplier all staffs in ifriends at the beginning of evaluation period * 100performance delivery score of staff
= all key staff's average Performance Score in ifriends / full score of performance score * 100
Qualitative Assessment:Firstly make qualitative assessment evaluation for each assessment factors, then
calculate total score as per each factor's assessment result and its weight. Formular: Total Score =
Qualitative Assessment of each factor(i) * Weight of each factor(i) Assessment
factors/Weight/Qualitative Assessment
Result------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Proprietary and Confidential
Page 3 of 10

Request for Information 410921

1./Technique performance
Section Weight 6
-----------------1) Technical qualification of key person/20%/ excellence(95)/good(80)/pass(60)/fail(0)2)
Staff stability of key person/30%/excellence(95)/good(80)/pass(60)/fail(0)3) Actual performance of key
person/50%/excellence(95)/good(80)/pass(60)/fail(0)Standard of Qualitative Assessment:Excellence(95):
Performance is fully comply or beyond Huawei's requirementGood(80): Most of performance comply
Huawei's requirement, only a little does not comply, but not effect delivery result.pass(60): A little or
some part do not comply requirement, but a little impact on delivery(impact is controllable)fail(0): Some
part or most do not comply requirement, seriously effect delivery.e.g. one supplier's Qualitative
Assessment result: Technical Qualification is excellence, Staff Stability is pass, Actual Performance is
good, so the total score=95*20%+60*30%+80*50%=77

Dr
a

ft

........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Value Type Numeric Value only
Scoring Manual, Weight 4, Knockout Score
1.1Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
1.2Equipment/ Instrument/ Tools(optional)Assessment factors:1) Necessary provision of instrument,
equipment, tools (eg. vichele, laptop, power meter, Site master, basic tool kit, mobile genset etc.)2)
Necessary maintenance of the instrument, equipment, tools3) Technical experience in using the
instrument, equipment and tools;
Qualitative Assessment:Firstly make qualitative assessment evaluation for each assessment factors, then
calculate total score as per each factor's assessment result and its weight. Formular: Total Score =
Qualitative assessment of each factor(i) * Weight of each factor(i) Assessment
factors/Weight/Qualitative Assessment
Result-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1) Provision of instrument, equipment, tools/20%/excellence(95)/good(80)/pass(60)/fail(0)2)
Maintenance of the instrument, equipment, tools/30%/excellence(95)/good(80)/pass(60)/fail(0)3)
Experience in using instrument, equipment and
tools/50%/excellence(95)/good(80)/pass(60)/fail(0)Standard of qualitative Assessment: Excellence(95):
Performance is fully comply or beyond Huawei's requirementGood(80): Most of performance comply
Huawei's requirement, only a little does not comply, but not impact on delivery.Pass(60): A little or some
part do not comply requirement, but a little impact on delivery(impact is controllable)Fail(0): Some part or
most do not comply requirement, seriously effect delivery.e.g. one supplier's Qualitative Assessment
result: provision is excellence, maintenanceis is pass, Technical experience is good, so the total
score=95*20%+60*30%+80*50%=77
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Value Type Numeric Value only
Scoring Manual, Weight 2, Knockout Score
1.2Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
2./Quality performance
Section Weight 60
2.1SLA/KPI(mandatory)Assessment factors:1) Supplier's daily maintenance performance SLA
achievement comparing with contract, including response, problem handling and closing.
Quantitative assessment:score = actual SLA/KPI score / full score * 100actual SLA/KPI score will be
calculated as per the SLA/KPI's definition and score calculation fomular defined in contract or approved
by the related engineering procurement authorization team.Remark: the calculation process of SLA and
KPI score will be uploaded to SPFM/SRM system for reference.
........................................................................................................................................................................
Proprietary and Confidential

Page 4 of 10

Request for Information 410921

2./Quality performance
Section Weight 60
Type Internal
Value Type Numeric Value only
Scoring Manual, Weight 50, Knockout Score
2.1Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
2.2Qualitiy issue(mandatory)Assessment factors:1) Delivery or work quality problem of supplier.
Qualitative assessment:Level 1: The performance is beyond or fully comply Huawei's requirement, no
quality issue or complain. (95 points)Level 2: The overall performance can comply Huawei's requirement,
no critical or major issue, and no more than 3 minor issues. (75 points)Level 3: Quite some quality issues,
the performance can comply Huawei requirement after improvement. (60 points)Level 4: Many quality
issues, the performance cannot comply Huawei's requirement. (0 points)

Dr
a

ft

........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Value Type Numeric Value only
Scoring Manual, Weight 10, Knockout Score
2.2Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
3./Responding in time
Section Weight 6
3.1Project management(mandatory)Assessment factors:1) Meeting attendance: Supplier shall attend the
routine meeting according to Huawei requirement.2) Report submit: Supplier shall submit the report
according to Huawei requirement.3) Response on delivery requirement: Supplier shall cooperate and
response Huawei or huawei customer's requirement proactively.4) Response on Procurement requirement:
Supplier shall response Huawei's RFQ/RFP or other supportive requirement timely.5) Application of IT
tools: The application of IT tools of management, e.g., iFriend, SCS etc.
Qualitative assessment:Firstly make qualitative assessment evaluation for each assessment factors, then
calculate total score as per each factor's assessment result and its weight. Formular: Total Score =
Qualitative assessment of each factor(i) * Weight of each factor(i) Assessment
factors/Weight/Qualitative Assessment
Result-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1) Meeting attendance/20%/excellence(95)/good(80)/pass(60)/fail(0)2) Report submit /20% /
excellence(95)/good(80)/pass(60)/fail(0)3) Response on delivery requirement/30%/
excellence(95)/good(80)/pass(60)/fail(0)4)Response on Procurement
requirement/10%/excellence(95)/good(80)/pass(60)/fail(0)5)Application of IT
tools/20%/excellence(95)/good(80)/pass(60)/fail(0)Standard of qualitative Assessment: Excellence(95):
Performance is fully comply or beyond Huawei's requirementGood(80): Most of performance comply
Huawei's requirement, only a little does not comply, but not effect delivery result.Pass(60): A little or
some part do not comply requirement, but a little impact on delivery(impact is controllable)Fail(0): Some
part or most do not comply requirement, seriously effect delivery.
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Value Type Numeric Value only
Scoring Manual, Weight 6, Knockout Score
3.1Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
4./Performance of material supplying
and commitment fulfillment
Proprietary and Confidential

Page 5 of 10

Request for Information 410921

Section Weight 12
4.1Document quality(mandatory)Assessment factors:1) Quality of delivery document: Maintenance
Reports and Acceptance Reports etc., the quality of these documents meet Huawei requirement (60%)2)
Quality of procurement document: PO were signed and feedback timely , Payment document and invoice
were submitted timely and accurately. (40%)
Qualitative Assessment:Firstly make qualitative assessment evaluation for each assessment factors, then
calculate total score as per each factor's assessment result and its weight. Formular: Total Score =
Qualitative assessment of each factor(i) * Weight of each factor(i) Assessment
factors/Weight/Qualitative Assessment
Result-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1) Quality of delivery document /60%/excellence(95)/good(80)/pass(60)/fail(0)2) Quality of
procurement document /40%/excellence(95)/good(80)/pass(60)/fail(0)Standard of qualitative Assessment:
Excellence(95): Performance is fully comply or beyond Huawei's requirementGood(80): Most of
performance comply Huawei's requirement, only a little does not comply, but no impact on
delivery.Pass(60): A little or some part do not comply requirement, but a little impact on delivery(impact
is controllable)Fail(0): Some part or most do not comply requirement, seriously impact on delivery.

Dr
a

ft

........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Value Type Numeric Value only
Scoring Manual, Weight 5, Knockout Score
4.1Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
4.2Code of Conduct(COC) and workflow compliance(mandatory)Assessment factors:1) Supplier comply
with workflow, conduct and regulation of Huawei and Huawei's customer.
Qualitative Assessment:Level 1: fully compliance with all workflow, conduct and regulations; (95
points)Level 2: Basic compliance with workflow, conduct and regulations, although there is minor
non-compliance, but no impact on delivery; (80 points)Level 3: A little non-compliance with workflow,
conduct and regulations, but did not cause complaints and little impact on delivery(impact is controllable);
(60 points)Level 4: Non-compliance with workflow, conduct and regulations, receiving complaint or
seriously impact on delivery;(0 points)
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Value Type Numeric Value only
Scoring Manual, Weight 2, Knockout Score
4.2Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
4.3customer satisifaction(optional)Assessment factors:1) Huawei's customer satisfaction
Quantitative Assessment:Level 1:Customer Satisfaction 70%scoreCustomer Satisfaction 100;Level
2:Customer Satisfaction 70%score = 0;
Qualitative Assessment:Level 1: Excellent performance of subcontractor, customer is very satisfied for it
and praised subcontractor formally; (95 points)Level 2: Good performance of subcontractor, customer
accept it, no any praise or complaint; (80 points)Level 3: Normal performance of subcontractor, and there
are few unofficial complaints; (60 points)Level 4: Bad performance of subcontractor, customer
dissatisfaction it and complaint subcontractor formally; (0 points)
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Value Type Numeric Value only
Scoring Manual, Weight 5, Knockout Score
4.3Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Proprietary and Confidential

Page 6 of 10

Request for Information 410921

Section Weight 12
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
5./Material cost
Section Weight 8
5.1Contribution for TCO reduction(optional)Assessment factors:1) Contribution for TCO reduction
Qualitative Assessment:Level 1: Proposed 3 or more suggestions of cost reduction, or outstanding
contribution to reduce TCO; (100 points)Level 2: Proposed 1-2 suggestions of cost reduction, or good
contribution to reduce TCO; (70 points)Level 3: No suggestion for cost reduction, no contribution to
reduce TCO; (40 points)Level 4: Subcontractor's problem caused cost increased ,there is a negative impact
to TCO; (0 points)

Dr
a

ft

........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Value Type Numeric Value only
Scoring Manual, Weight 3, Knockout Score
5.1Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
5.2quality cost(optional)Assessment factorsQuality loss due to Supplier's fault 1) the quality loss rised due
to service quality of supplier, such as equipment damaged or stolen, or huawei engineer need to go to site
and provide support to supplier to find the probelm etc. 2) Site re-visit, VO changed or accpetance delay
due to supplier's fault.3) Increasing Huawei invisible cost of quality due to subcontractor's fault.
Qualitative Assessment:Level 1: Excellent performance, subcontractor does not increase Huawei's quality
cost, and supplier can propose and help Huawei to reduce quality cost; (95 points)Level 2: Normal
performance , a slight increase huawei's cost, but no impact on project delivery; (80 points)Level 3:
Increase a little cost of quality due to subcontractor, minor effect on project delivery; (60 points)Level 4:
Quality cost increased much due to subcontractor , serious negative impact on project delivery; (0 points)
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Value Type Numeric Value only
Scoring Manual, Weight 5, Knockout Score
5.2Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
6./Environment-friendly
and social responsibility performance
Section Weight 5
6.1EHS(mandatory)Assessment factors1) Necessary PPE , correctly use; proper personal image and
dressing2) Follow the safety drive requirements (Forbidden drunk driving, forbidden speeding, forbidden
using mobile while driving and wearing seat belt, forbidden serving specific medicines when driving,
etc.);3) Comply with the rules and requirements of the electricity use, such as electrically qualification and
others;4) Comply with the rules of work in height , such as the qualification of work in height;5) The
management of waste materials, noise control and should comply with ISO 14001;
Qualitative AssessmentLevel 1: Subcontractor can actively engage in EHS management, and
implementation process in full compliance with the requirement of Huawei and local laws; (95 point)Level
2: Slight violation of above requirements during the implementation, violation not more than (included)3
times; (75 point)Level 3: Many violation of above requirements, but not serious; (60 point)Level 4: Many
violation of above requirements, cause EHS incidents or complaints; (0 point)
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Value Type Numeric Value only
Scoring Manual, Weight 3, Knockout Score
Proprietary and Confidential

Page 7 of 10

Request for Information 410921

6./Environment-friendly
and social responsibility performance
Section Weight 5
6.1Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
6.2CSR(mandatory)Assessment factors1) Compliance with requirement of Business Ethics or Honesty
and Integrity (HIA)2) No salary delay or arrears;3) No child labor ;4) Compliance with local
laws/regulations;
Qualitative AssessmentLevel 1: Subcontractors can take the initiative to manage CSR, comply with
Huawei requirement , the performance comply with Huawei's expectation;(100 points)Level 2:
subcontractor does not follow Huawei CSR requirement; (0 points)

Dr
a

ft

........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Value Type Numeric Value only
Scoring Manual, Weight 2, Knockout Score
6.2Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
7./Security performance
Section Weight 3
7.1Cyber security(mandatory)Assessment factors
1) Signed cyber security agreement;2) Cyber security training;3) Cyber security self-check;4) Records of
project implementation;5) If violation of cyber security;6) The response process of emergency cyber
security issues;
Qualitative AssessmentLevel 1: Fully comply with Cyber Security Agreement; (100 points)Level 2:
Violation action of Cyber Security Agreement; (0 points)
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Value Type Numeric Value only
Scoring Manual, Weight 3, Knockout Score
7.1Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
8./Others
Section Weight 0
8.1Critical Quality and Safety Accidents by Subcontractors(mandatory)Assessment factors:Critical quality
and safety accidents: only consider the accident cause by subcontract reasons.1) Critical accident of
network: Refer to level standard of GTS accidents issued by IRB, stat. accidents above level-2(included)2)
Critical accident of engineering: Refer to the accidents level in "punishment regulation of violation on
engineering construction safety production and quality", special class accidents into stat. special class
accidents includes:against regulation of construction safety during construction, caused the loss over 20
KUSD; Engineering loss or correction expense caused by quality problems over 100 KUSD.3) EHS/CSR
accidents: Stat. from EHS e-flow accidents level from the system, and the level is decided by company
EHS committee.
Assessment methods:A: Above accident more than one times, the performance reult shall be updated ,
and the final grade must be less than B(included);B: No above accident
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring Automatic, Weight 0, Knockout Score
Proprietary and Confidential

Page 8 of 10

Request for Information 410921

8./Others
Section Weight 0
........................................................................................................................................................................
Acceptable Values (score displayed in brackets):
A (1)
B (0)
8.1Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
8.2Serious complaint from customer(mandatory)Assessment factor:1) the serious customer complaint due
to failure of KPI/SLA achievement or delivery quality problem of supplier,
Assessment method:A: once the serious complaint from customer happened, the performance evaluation
rating will be degraded, and it should be no higher than B finally.B: no serious complaint from customer

Dr
a

ft

........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring Automatic, Weight 0, Knockout Score
........................................................................................................................................................................
Acceptable Values (score displayed in brackets):
A (1)
B (0)
8.2Comments
........................................................................................................................................................................
Type Internal
Scoring None, Weight 0, Knockout Score
1.5 Response Rules
This negotiation is governed by all the rules displayed below.
X
X
X
X
X

Negotiation is restricted to invited suppliers


Suppliers are allowed to provide multiple responses
Buyer may create multiple rounds of negotiations
Buyer may close the negotiation before the Close Date
Buyer may manually extend the negotiation while it is open

Proprietary and Confidential

Page 9 of 10

Request for Information 410921

2 Invited Suppliers
Supplier
Supplier Site

Additional Contact
Email

, Sales

Access
Full

Dr
a

ft

HUAWEI
TECHNOLOGIES
CO. LTD.

Contact

Proprietary and Confidential

Page 10 of 10