0 Up votes0 Down votes

1 views24 pagesEnjoy it....!

Sep 07, 2016

© © All Rights Reserved

PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

Enjoy it....!

© All Rights Reserved

1 views

Enjoy it....!

© All Rights Reserved

- Stat 230 Ol4 Us2 Sections Final Exam Spring 2015 Complete Solution
- OKTALINA (17051214009) SI 17 A
- S-lab5-2507-W10
- HW10-solu-F09[2]
- 32bfe50e5decdcabab
- Hypothesis Testing I
- P Values Are Not Error Probabilities
- Chi Square Test
- MOBILE PHONE FEATURE PREFERENCES AND CONSUMPTION PATTERN OF STUDENTS IN UNIVERSITY OF SARGODHA
- Financial crisis and stock market efficiency: Empirical evidence from Asian countries
- 140 Lecture 20
- Hypothesis Test Example for Population Mean (1)
- A Study on Performance Management in Vel Leathers
- 26860-90070-1-SM
- Chapter 11 Solutions
- Lecture 4
- Assignment
- 9. Large Sample Tests of Hypothesis
- Sample Exam
- Student Answer Sheet STAT200 Fall 2018 OL1

You are on page 1of 24

No. 1 & 2

H0: There is no association between Male child preferred over

female child and Parents send only male child for better education.

female child and Parents send only male child for better education.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Better School

Strongly

Quality education

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

12

17

14

51

Expected Count

10.7

14.8

9.2

13.3

3.1

51.0

Count

12

31

Expected Count

6.5

9.0

5.6

8.1

1.9

31.0

Count

Expected Count

1.3

1.7

1.1

1.6

.4

6.0

Count

Expected Count

1.5

2.0

1.3

1.8

.4

7.0

Count

Expected Count

1.0

1.4

.9

1.3

.3

5.0

Count

21

29

18

26

100

Expected Count

21.0

29.0

18.0

26.0

6.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

33.735a

16

.006

Likelihood Ratio

34.446

16

.005

Linear-by-Linear Association

5.807

.016

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .30.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 4 & 5

H0: There is not any association that male child thought as next

bread winner and female child considered as Socio-Economic

burden.

bread winner and female child considered as Socio-Economic

burden.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Socio Economic Burden

Strongly

Bread Winner

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly

Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

11

27

Expected Count

4.0

4.9

8.4

7.0

2.7

27.0

Count

19

32

Expected Count

4.8

5.8

9.9

8.3

3.2

32.0

Count

18

Expected Count

2.7

3.2

5.6

4.7

1.8

18.0

Count

19

Expected Count

2.8

3.4

5.9

4.9

1.9

19.0

Count

Expected Count

.6

.7

1.2

1.0

.4

4.0

Count

15

18

31

26

10

100

Expected Count

15.0

18.0

31.0

26.0

10.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

T54. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

46.863a

16

.000

Likelihood Ratio

46.245

16

.000

Linear-by-Linear Association

5.947

.015

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .40.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we reject the Ho.

No. 6 & 7

H0: There is independency that Liberties enjoyed by the male

and only male child given opportunity to study abroad.

only male child given opportunity to study abroad.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Abroad study

Strongly

Liberties

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

20

Expected Count

4.6

5.4

4.2

2.4

3.4

20.0

Count

31

Expected Count

7.1

8.4

6.5

3.7

5.3

31.0

Count

20

Expected Count

4.6

5.4

4.2

2.4

3.4

20.0

Count

21

Expected Count

4.8

5.7

4.4

2.5

3.6

21.0

Count

Expected Count

1.8

2.2

1.7

1.0

1.4

8.0

Count

23

27

21

12

17

100

Expected Count

23.0

27.0

21.0

12.0

17.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

21.010a

16

.178

Likelihood Ratio

25.407

16

.063

Linear-by-Linear Association

4.347

.037

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .96.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 8 & 10

H0: There is no assurance that females only given Peripheral

jobs and feminine gender exempted from harsh remarks at

organization.

and feminine gender exempted from harsh remarks at organization.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Harsh Remark

Strongly

PeriphalJobs

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

29

Expected Count

5.2

10.4

9.0

2.0

2.3

29.0

Count

11

11

31

Expected Count

5.6

11.2

9.6

2.2

2.5

31.0

Count

12

28

Expected Count

5.0

10.1

8.7

2.0

2.2

28.0

Count

Expected Count

.7

1.4

1.2

.3

.3

4.0

Count

Expected Count

1.4

2.9

2.5

.6

.6

8.0

Count

18

36

31

100

Expected Count

18.0

36.0

31.0

7.0

8.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

21.468a

16

.161

Likelihood Ratio

26.495

16

.047

Linear-by-Linear Association

2.927

.087

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .28.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 11 & 13

H0: There is not stability that Males only subjected to rigorous

and tiring work stress or the males are the work horse of

organization.

tiring work stress or the males are the work horse of organization.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Workhorse

Strongly

Tiring Work

Strongly Agree

Stress

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

20

Expected Count

3.6

8.4

5.0

2.4

.6

20.0

Count

15

31

Expected Count

5.6

13.0

7.8

3.7

.9

31.0

Count

11

29

Expected Count

5.2

12.2

7.2

3.5

.9

29.0

Count

10

Expected Count

1.8

4.2

2.5

1.2

.3

10.0

Count

10

Expected Count

1.8

4.2

2.5

1.2

.3

10.0

Count

18

42

25

12

100

Expected Count

18.0

42.0

25.0

12.0

3.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

23.544a

16

.100

Likelihood Ratio

26.086

16

.053

Linear-by-Linear Association

2.279

.131

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .30.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 11 & 14

H0: There is not stability that Males only subjected to rigorous

and tiring work stress and the males are given field jobs because of

their right.

tiring work stress and the males are given field jobs because of

their right.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Field Jobs

Strongly

Tiring Work

Strongly Agree

Stress

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly

Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

20

Expected Count

4.8

5.6

4.6

4.0

1.0

20.0

Count

10

31

Expected Count

7.4

8.7

7.1

6.2

1.6

31.0

Count

10

11

29

Expected Count

7.0

8.1

6.7

5.8

1.4

29.0

Count

10

Expected Count

2.4

2.8

2.3

2.0

.5

10.0

Count

10

Expected Count

2.4

2.8

2.3

2.0

.5

10.0

Count

24

28

23

20

100

Expected Count

24.0

28.0

23.0

20.0

5.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

23.975a

16

.090

Likelihood Ratio

27.590

16

.035

Linear-by-Linear Association

.318

.573

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .50.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 15 & 17

H0: There is not association that male gender is always preferred

as bread winner and Husband also take part in household activities.

bread winner and Husband also take part in household activities.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Households

Strongly

Pref Bread

Strongly Agree

Winner

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly

Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

12

11

10

39

Expected Count

9.4

14.8

8.2

4.3

2.3

39.0

Count

17

37

Expected Count

8.9

14.1

7.8

4.1

2.2

37.0

Count

15

Expected Count

3.6

5.7

3.2

1.6

.9

15.0

Count

Expected Count

1.0

1.5

.8

.4

.2

4.0

Count

Expected Count

1.2

1.9

1.0

.6

.3

5.0

Count

24

38

21

11

100

Expected Count

24.0

38.0

21.0

11.0

6.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

24.699a

16

.075

Likelihood Ratio

25.721

16

.058

Linear-by-Linear Association

.901

.343

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .24.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 16 & 18

H0: There is not association that mother considered solely

responsible for childs grooming and Children consider their

mother as their friend.

responsible for childs grooming and Children consider their

mother as their friend.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Friend Consider

Strongly

Child Grooming

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

11

24

Expected Count

6.2

7.0

6.5

3.1

1.2

24.0

Count

10

14

13

47

Expected Count

12.2

13.6

12.7

6.1

2.4

47.0

Count

20

Expected Count

5.2

5.8

5.4

2.6

1.0

20.0

Count

Expected Count

1.8

2.0

1.9

.9

.4

7.0

Count

Expected Count

.5

.6

.5

.3

.1

2.0

Count

26

29

27

13

100

Expected Count

26.0

29.0

27.0

13.0

5.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

18.991a

16

.269

Likelihood Ratio

19.326

16

.252

Linear-by-Linear Association

.157

.692

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .10.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 17 & 19

H0: There is not any association that husband also take part in

household activities and wife is penalized for any mischief of

child.

activities and wife is penalized for any mischief of child.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Mischief of Child

Strongly

Households

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

12

24

Expected Count

5.8

7.2

6.7

2.9

1.4

24.0

Count

11

11

38

Expected Count

9.1

11.4

10.6

4.6

2.3

38.0

Count

10

21

Expected Count

5.0

6.3

5.9

2.5

1.3

21.0

Count

11

Expected Count

2.6

3.3

3.1

1.3

.7

11.0

Count

Expected Count

1.4

1.8

1.7

.7

.4

6.0

Count

24

30

28

12

100

Expected Count

24.0

30.0

28.0

12.0

6.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

35.496a

16

.003

Likelihood Ratio

39.104

16

.001

Linear-by-Linear Association

4.195

.041

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .36.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we reject the Ho.

No. 21 & 23

H0: There is independency that female seats are less in national

assembly and female never given presidency because of weak

nerve.

assembly and female never given presidency because of weak

nerve.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Presidency

Strongly

NA seats

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

12

11

34

Expected Count

8.5

8.5

8.5

5.4

3.1

34.0

Count

31

Expected Count

7.8

7.8

7.8

5.0

2.8

31.0

Count

22

Expected Count

5.5

5.5

5.5

3.5

2.0

22.0

Count

Expected Count

2.2

2.2

2.2

1.4

.8

9.0

Count

Expected Count

1.0

1.0

1.0

.6

.4

4.0

Count

25

25

25

16

100

Expected Count

25.0

25.0

25.0

16.0

9.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

24.003a

16

.089

Likelihood Ratio

27.039

16

.041

Linear-by-Linear Association

.534

.465

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .36.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 24 & 25

H0: There is not association that females are not given

opportunities and females doctors waste their studies in house

after marriage.

and females doctors waste their studies in house after marriage.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

After Marriage

Strongly

Family Burden

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

13

21

Expected Count

4.2

8.4

4.2

2.3

1.9

21.0

Count

27

Expected Count

5.4

10.8

5.4

3.0

2.4

27.0

Count

13

33

Expected Count

6.6

13.2

6.6

3.6

3.0

33.0

Count

14

Expected Count

2.8

5.6

2.8

1.5

1.3

14.0

Count

Expected Count

1.0

2.0

1.0

.6

.4

5.0

Count

20

40

20

11

100

Expected Count

20.0

40.0

20.0

11.0

9.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

19.996a

16

.220

Likelihood Ratio

22.339

16

.133

Linear-by-Linear Association

5.083

.024

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .45.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we do not reject the Ho.

No. 29 & 30

H0: There is independency that liberalism has reduced the

respect of woman and males are dominant only because of their

superior masculine strength.

of woman and males are dominant only because of their superior

masculine strength.

Test Statistics:

Critical region:

If p-value (=0.05) then we reject Ho, otherwise we do not

reject.

Masculine Strength

Strongly

Liberalism

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

Total

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neutral

Disagree

Disagree

Total

Count

19

Expected Count

7.0

6.1

3.0

2.3

.6

19.0

Count

13

23

Expected Count

8.5

7.4

3.7

2.8

.7

23.0

Count

10

31

Expected Count

11.5

9.9

5.0

3.7

.9

31.0

Count

12

21

Expected Count

7.8

6.7

3.4

2.5

.6

21.0

Count

Expected Count

2.2

1.9

1.0

.7

.2

6.0

Count

37

32

16

12

100

Expected Count

37.0

32.0

16.0

12.0

3.0

100.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2Value

df

sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

28.887a

16

.025

Likelihood Ratio

30.918

16

.014

Linear-by-Linear Association

.002

.961

N of Valid Cases

100

expected count is .18.

Conclusion:

As p-value 0.05, so we reject the Ho.

- Stat 230 Ol4 Us2 Sections Final Exam Spring 2015 Complete SolutionUploaded bycoursehomework
- OKTALINA (17051214009) SI 17 AUploaded byOktalina Karimah
- S-lab5-2507-W10Uploaded bymikeface
- HW10-solu-F09[2]Uploaded byNimroz Momin
- 32bfe50e5decdcababUploaded byRalukusha_
- Hypothesis Testing IUploaded byMehdi Hooshmand
- P Values Are Not Error ProbabilitiesUploaded bynilton_ufcg@gmail.com
- Chi Square TestUploaded byKetan Jani
- MOBILE PHONE FEATURE PREFERENCES AND CONSUMPTION PATTERN OF STUDENTS IN UNIVERSITY OF SARGODHAUploaded byasifch_lums
- Financial crisis and stock market efficiency: Empirical evidence from Asian countriesUploaded byRamona Radu
- 140 Lecture 20Uploaded byArsalan Rabbanian
- Hypothesis Test Example for Population Mean (1)Uploaded byLola Saadi
- A Study on Performance Management in Vel LeathersUploaded byGayu S Vignesh
- 26860-90070-1-SMUploaded byjuventadwi
- Chapter 11 SolutionsUploaded byGreg
- Lecture 4Uploaded byRinjani Pebriawan
- AssignmentUploaded byMandeep Singh
- 9. Large Sample Tests of HypothesisUploaded bytfuribe
- Sample ExamUploaded byAdrian Adi
- Student Answer Sheet STAT200 Fall 2018 OL1Uploaded byCristhian Montoya
- AUploaded byAkhil Aggarwal
- Quiz 3 review questions.docxUploaded bySteven Nguyen
- Pertemuan7_Onesample_hypothesisTest_revised.pdfUploaded byEdma Nadhif Oktariani
- Chapter 13 (independent study unit).docxUploaded byLauren Stam
- Midterm Exam With AnswersUploaded byShanna Basallo Alenton
- 41. Hum-factors Driving ConsuUploaded byImpact Journals
- Marketing Research AssignmentUploaded byranjan
- P Value DefinitionUploaded byitsme5616
- Test for Difference of Means (1)Uploaded byMagadiskanda Narasimha
- 8_Analyze - Hypothesis Testing Non Normal Data - P2.pptxUploaded byParaschivescu Cristina

- QuestionnaireUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- Role ProfileUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- British Council Core Skills Nov 2014Uploaded byImran Hasan
- An STM Exercise#1Uploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- Road to hellUploaded byvssm123
- Strategic Design LensUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- Leadership LEC#3(Skills Approach)Uploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- A.N Ron JohnsonUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- 3 Design LensUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- Leadership CaseUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- FInal Report on PTVUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- Final Report on PTCLUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- The Road to Hell is Paved With Good IntentionsUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí
- Assignment on elements and process of.docxUploaded byAmmâd Ñãqí

- 11. Hypothesis TestingUploaded byNurgazy Nazhimidinov
- Cryptography.Uploaded byUgiSugirwo
- Basics of CUploaded byMohammed Al-Otaibi
- Acid Plant Shutdown.xlsxUploaded bymohdmustafaali1986
- DotNetLABMANUAL vtu 2015Uploaded byKiran Bhandari
- saaty1977Uploaded byVimal Kek
- Visual Data MiningUploaded bySubhadra Haribabu
- 11 Physics NcertSolutions Chapter 7 Exercises AdditionalUploaded byNeural Spark Physics Cie
- CorrelationUploaded byAnubhav Mittal
- SCSE Induction Presentation 2016-Day1-1Aug.pdfUploaded byAkash Kumar
- Dveloping Measurement Mathematical Model in Management Change & Strategic Planning Using BSC PerspectivesUploaded byIT2000
- Artificial Intelligence for Situation AssessmentUploaded byTarek Hw
- USB 2000 SpectrometerUploaded byalexlhhcas
- Chapter 6 Investigating DataUploaded byJojobaby51714
- EI2402-Logic and Distributed Control System QBUploaded bybaraniinst
- INTERCAMBIADORUploaded bylcando
- Java Assign 2Uploaded byKarthikeyan Balasubramanian
- The main characteristic of soil temperature regime in the Ohrid-Prespa zoneUploaded bytdropulic
- Modern Period (17th-19th Century) on MathematicsUploaded byprincesbulaclac
- equacao_breguet.pdfUploaded byCarlos Alberto
- Secure Mobile System Using NTRU EncryptUploaded byseventhsensegroup
- ISEN_614_HW1Uploaded byAdvendro Chandra
- B.Tech-B-2012Uploaded bysaireddy19
- L. Balents, M. P. A. Fisher and S. M. Girvin- Fractionalization in an easy-axis Kagome antiferromagnetUploaded byGravvol
- Servo Ep100Uploaded byNguyễn Anh Tú
- Twin Screw Compressor Performance and Its Relationship With RotorUploaded bySaeedAkbarzadeh
- 3-solutions-clrs-18Uploaded byalac_john
- A Comparison of Canadian, Mexican, And United States Steel Design StandardsUploaded byfred flintstone
- Thermal Analysis of the Arc Welding Process Part II.pdfUploaded byKris Jiménez Nigro
- Development of a Steam Generating Dynamo MeterUploaded byMohamed Adel

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.