case

If we dont relive the orgy- then we will never be able to solve

the issue- the orgy died down in the first place- there will
never be change unless we face this power and bring this issue
into the debate space:
1. their liberatin k is a silencing of the 1AC- they are lierally
saying that just by us bringing up the issue we will lose and
link
2. thie same k links inot the same impacts as they too play
intot hands of power3. it is a prereq to reform the they self and breaking out to
solve any issue- extend the 1AC hrning- if we dont- then we
risk cooption by the SQ
They say the reconlcing of differences- however we need to
discuss the otherness or else it riskst slincing- also we are not
attempting for sone utopian future- we are merely providing
the opportunity for indivioduals to have this embracement of
anxiety
Cx the Schlag 3 card to the Physco k they run- the same
impacts cx and they will not get agency- also cx Magrnini that
we just need individual acceptance- they have misinterpreted
our claims of social agency
The Institute for Precarious Consciousness- No productive
politics can move forward without new ideas of anxiety and
new productive politics can move forward without addressing
surveillance 1. Inauthentic modes of anxiety oppress people
and make them unable to do anything 2. Surveillance shuts
down movements before it begins. And even then uses
disciplinary power to shut them down and creates more
anxiety 3. That adds more to the cycle of anxiety arg

Magrini (3)- Acceptance of anxiety makes us want to have a

conscious that lets us recognize the responsibility of choosing
and allows us the freedom to chose which is the authentic
relationship. If you dont address resoluteness correctly then
ethics become impossible if all we do is conform to the
theyself then we can never help the other. Waking up from the
theyself is a key prerequisite to having an authentic
relashionship.
Horning- People explicitly conform to surveillance and the
more people conform data must be become more totalitarian
and more extreme because people are becoming more similar.
In order to have radical potential we have to break out of this
government control which is conformity. We can live life
through our own values rather than the theyself. In order to
profane apparatuses we have to seize one ourselves.

Fw
We are meeting the domestic- the anxiety is within the NSA a0
domestic organization- we literary meet all of their definitionsand they fail

Physco
One fot eh biggest arguments was the no link arg we made int
eh 2AC- they attempt to claim that derire is the lack of anxietyhowever, they fail to address the 1AC magrnin and cirtchely
evidence which shows that anxiety is latent within dasein- we
are always feeling from this biological death and therefore we
are trapped within these social norms- anxiety is always
present- it just matters how we deal with the issue- either with
an inauthentic or authentic understanding- we even anxios the
the moment we come out of the mothers womb because of fear
of death and the mothers fear of death- not because we cannot
provide for ourselves
Extend the robinson- lacan args break sinto therese
conservatinve args- literally rejects acting in attempt o
traverse this made up fantasy- this means that their k will
never procide any social change
Cx all the Schlag anyalss they made onto the k alt
The perm works for 2 reason- we are a traversal of the fantasythe theyself is the false world and theo only way out is by
breaking out- ex horning from the 1ac, and an intersectional
approach is best- they provide no reason whty thr tweo
metholdoigies cannot work together