This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
Share Yesterday at 3:57am | Edit Note | Delete Vincent Cataldi Richard C. Hoagland: methane hydrate frequency - dissociation www.facebook.com www.facebook.com Sunday at 9:52pm · Comment · Unlike · Share You and Kathleen Marcelli like this. Vincent Cataldi Deepwater Horizon - Draft 1.A http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=391702826491 Sunday at 9:52pm · Greg Ahrens Vincent, that ultrasound idea sounds good. Bust up those pesky methane hydrate "ice cubes" just like kidney stones! Sunday at 10:47pm · Vincent Cataldi Greg: That is the method to make them explosively unstable; I think this is what Roo found HAARP doing; why the 'deep' pressures are surging wildly; belching to clear the vertical rise of the wells in the Gulf, and North Sea; if so, a cascade potential threatens especially if energized by 'ultrasound'. Monday at 12:36am · Roo Reindeer Your discussion of what amounts to "inter-related non-linear' uncertainties and phase changes is very important. Particularly with people throwing the idea of nukes around. I see from this map here that the gulf is one area where considerable sources of MH have been located. http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/05/could-methane-t/ you will notice two locations in the gulf, pert near the DH drilling site! How convienient. There are numerous articles relating to runaway release of methane from warming MH deposits. It really doesn't matter to what cause you attribute global warming. The release of methane will make it way worse. Although probably not this bad: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Permian-Triassic_extinction_event Destabilzation of these deposits could be far worse then just the current oil mess. But that raises a new paranoid possibility that the release of that methane may be a goal of this "event". As far as anything involving HARRP (see disclaimer below) and methane release I hadn't considered that. Stupid me! It might be possible to do that without anyone even really noticing since unlike earthquakes and volcanoes, it could be a slow subtle heating that would raise no flags until it popped off. Disclaimer: The "HARRP" I have been writing about has no relationship to the well known "HAARP" organization. Superficial resemblence to HAARP or any other organization living or dead, real or imaginary is purely coincidental. Like a lot of other things. Monday at 1:11am · Greg Ahrens OOPS. I was thinking of breaking up the methane hydrates that were clogging the first containment dome attempt. But clearly this whole business of extracting volatile fluids and gases from that depth below the ocean surface is crazy. I thought the CBS 60 Minutes piece said the Deepwater Horizon experiment was the deepest offshore well ever attempted. I have not been able to verify that yet. I came across another attempt at an even greater depth. Shell Oil has a rig called the "Perdido Spar" off the coast of Texas near Galveston that is attempting to drill in 9,000 feet of water and another 8,000 feet of mud, salt, and rock below that. And get this: the portion of the rig called the spar, below the water surface (not including the riser pipes) has a height (or depth) of 555 feet. That just happens to be the height of the (Masonic) Washington Monument . This one rig will be attempting to service a field the size of Houston. Certainly one to keep an eye on. I also recommend prayers.,,,,, http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-02/extreme-engineering-deepest-oil-well Monday at 1:40am · Storm Thor its good you guys have this all figured out ... Monday at 1:40am · Vincent Cataldi Greg: I understood exactly what you were thinking - a logical first thought; I am very pleased you engaged seriously to help with what I see potentially as an important issue for teamwork to consider. Roo: I've been waiting for you :) I began my 'flash' education explicitly for the reason you state; I saw people "Giving Up" with statements like 'How could it be any worse'?, and 'Russia is laughing at us'; I got in their face every time, this was not an acceptable "public opinion" to me, and I made sure Everyone knew my position: but it was only my hunch initially. I worked to Spell Out for all to read, the complexities of unknowns - spent two days researching to prove myself wrong - I could not; with my amateur view, we can not accept a 'nice little nuke' to quickly solve our problem - no quick fix here - and it may not have finished "starting" to look ugly. I suspect this Concept IS related to what you discovered - yet only you are truly qualified to tell us if I am wrong with certainty; so I did research, compiling data so you could most easily give us all another assessment - an opinion I and others respect greatly. My question: can (should) we view the highly fractured Gulf of Mexico Impact Zone (Chicxulub Impact Crater ??), now ringed with (oil/gas producing) bore holes (vents), as a virtual "Caldera" ringed by virtual volcanoes; covered by an "explosive" cap of stratified rock embedded with temperamental MH - the virtual caldera cap over the virtual lava dome - and if no - why not ? One can envision for use the MH 'locked' precariously in the rock strata, from the ocean floor down to the crude oil/gas reservoir, as a blasting cap; a primer cascading to envelope the entire fractured circumference of, highly pressurized - explosively saturated - crude (lava) vault; which if 'energized properly' (naturally or otherwise) could flash-over as a grease fire of enormous scale ?
-----------------------------------------------------------------"No supervolcano has erupted in recorded human history, but geologists have pieced together what an explosion must have been like. First, a plume of heat wells up from deep within the planet and melts rock just beneath the crust of the Earth, creating a vast chamber filled with a pressurized mix of magma, semisolid rock, and dissolved water vapor, carbon dioxide, and other gases. As additional magma accumulates in the chamber over thousands of years, the land above begins to dome upward by inches. Fractures open along the dome's edges, as if burglars were sawing a hole from beneath a wooden floor. When the pressure in the magma chamber is released through the fractures, the dissolved gases suddenly explode in a massive, runaway reaction. It's like "opening the Coke bottle after you've shaken it," says Bob Christiansen, a U.S. Geological Survey scientist who pioneered research on the Yellowstone volcano in the 1960s. With the magma chamber emptied, the surface collapses. The entire domed region simply falls into the planet, as though the Earth were consuming itself. Left behind is a giant caldera, from the Spanish word for "cauldron." " -----------------------------------------------------------------Under Yellowstone — Interactive — National Geographic Magazine ngm.nationalgeographic.com Beneath Yellowstone Park a monstrous plume of hot rock is causing the earth to heave and tremble. Past volcanoes have erupted with a thousand times the power of Mount St. Helens. The future is anybody’s guess. http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2009/08/yellowstone/yellowstone-interactive Under Yellowstone, Magma Pocket 20% Larger Than Thought news.nationalgeographic.com The massive column of molten rock that feeds the park's volcano dives deeper and fills a magma chamber bigger than previous estimates, according to the most detailed model yet of the region's plumbing. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/12/091215-yellowstone-volcano-magma-plume-larger.html Looking inside the structure of the Yellowstone Caldera : Eruptions scienceblogs.com Hi! You're looking at Eruptions, a blog dedicated to volcanism. Your host is Dr. Erik Klemetti, a geologist who spends most of his professional time thinking about magma. Looking for info on the latest ... http://scienceblogs.com/eruptions/2010/02/the_structure_of_calderas.php Monday at 3:34am · Vincent Cataldi Vincent Cataldi -> Richard C. Hoagland: Deepwater Horizon - Draft 1.A http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=213984790088&share_id=124936820863159&comments=1#s124936820863159 Monday at 4:02am · Aaron Bathols Vince....I appluad your tireless, informative research. Monday at 4:04am · Vincent Cataldi Insightful Insanity - realized :) Monday at 4:06am · Vincent Cataldi All the Seismograms around the planet went crazy - UPDATED http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=391178956491 Monday at 4:52am · Vincent Cataldi All the Seismograms around the planet went crazy - GRAPHS http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=15351&id=100000360291470&l=82839344a3 Monday at 6:12am · Roo Reindeer Vincent:Those seismograms are showing the results of a magnitude 6 in the Phillipines. http://www.iris.edu/seismon/last30.html Most of them are the normal response of a large quake. The time delays for the arrival at each station look resonable with regard to distance from the center. I don't know yet if any of the preceding traces show a precursor or not. I'm looking at them now. If you look at the post I put further up the page you will see how the precursor data can "disappear". This actually is an innocent artifact of the plotting process, but can be very annoying. I was looking at some Norway station annomilies with a period of 18.5 to 20 hours..hmmm..when I first noticed it. Monday at 12:33pm · Vincent Cataldi Roo: Thanks; I saved each page individually, and did not also save the image; i hoped that posting one of my many folders of graphs thumbnails - unknown time and date - may prompt you to help me get what we need to post :) I do suspect I saved the Ionosphere data for the events properly, so I did not yet post those - but if you can or wish to pass this along too - please. If I knew where you hid your doorbell; I would have quietly asked more directly with private diplomacy. Monday at 1:49pm · Roo Reindeer Vincent: I couldn't see anything obvious this time. The only oddball stuff is: ADK Aliutians, Alaska, which is near the you now what transmitter went off just at the start of the Philippine quake, to the minute. it's still off 9.5 hours later. KONO Norway had strange slow pulses going back to yesterday. I was looking at them beacause they had a group rate of 18-20 hours. But they continue now after the Philippine quake as well. SDV Venezuela looks like somebody really doen't like poor Hugo! But none of that shows up on the rest of the Carabean sites. Looks like selective targeting ;-)
Nothing on the Ion stuff either but I don't think that will show up till the 12th or so. Looks like a natural one, they do happen sometimes :( ADK going offline at 1016 looks interesting though. Monday at 2:28pm · Roo Reindeer Vincent: Glad you brought up Yellowstone. and other super volcanoes. There are other major hotspots that tie into that as well. They seem to be distributed near a great circle path that can be used to define a "new" equator and an axis of rotation offset from the normal polar axis. I have determined that this axis would have a north pole located at approx 39 deg lat, and 110-120 long. Not exact but close. The really interesting thing is that the Hawaiin hotspot basically remains near the same 19.5 latitude. If you subject the lat-lon coordinate grid of a sphere to an arbitrary rotation you will find that only ONE point retains it's old latitude co-ordinate in the new co-ordinate system, this is the point that you would be rotating the grid system around.(two points retain their old latitude, 0 deg, if you rotate it around a point located on the equator, but that is a special case). This axis causes so many geophysical features to line up on lines of latitude and longitude in the new system in a natural way that I am inclined to think it may represent a natural Axis of Convection for mantel currents in the earth. The core and mantel may rotate about this offset axis. The Hawaiin hotspot remains at the tetrahedrally important latitude of 19.5 in both systems. The fact that it links them together may have hyperdimensional consequences. If the two axies were to be aligned it's possible that the flow of energy from higher dimensions postulated in RCH's Hyperdimensional Physics model could vastly increase. This alignment of "real" and "hyperdimensional" axes of rotation could be the key to the idea of exploding planets, and the reason the sun puts out it's energy. It's axes seem to almost line up. The normal axis of sunspots (hotspots, that trace it's inner convective dynamics) lies closer to the physical rotation axis. Our rotational and convective axis seem to be misaligned by roughly 39 deg. Interesting coincidence again :-) Perhaps in the case of a super-nova you have perfect alignment...whoopee. If a slow drift of this internal axis, whether at random or somehow linked to rotation around the galaxy or whatever (rotation,rotation,rotation again; the key to higher dimensional flow, masonic 500 etc ;-) were to bring them closer to alignment it could explain a lot of geophysical activity. Assume for the moment that the present 39 degree offset has been there for a long time and is "safe". Ie our temperature remains near 300 kelvin. Further assume that a near true alignment would light up the earth like the sun, at least 4000 kelvin even at the surface. If the absolute temperature were proportional to the tangent of the angle of the latitude of the Convective Pole a change of 5 deg would change the average temperature by 20%, that's roughly 60 kelvin. Our average temp would be 85 C instead of 25. 185 F !! To change the temp by 20 F, and goodbye icecaps at the very least, would require only about a 10 kelvin increase in absolute temperature that's 3%. The angle would only have to change to 39.8 deg....only 0.8 frickking degrees of offset from the present. This is only about 55 miles of travel on the surface. In the process of this core axis shifting a natural consequence would be much more geological activity due to stress induced by torque on the crust which continues to rotate about the "normal" axis. So you get a double whammy, overal rise in temperatures and much more geophysical activity of a destructive nature. Last but not least, due to the non linearity of trigonometric functions, if the axial offset is depedent on some sort of galactic positioning, it is possible that the rate of shifting could increase radically in a sort time span. And it would not take much of a shift to make a big change to begin with. Most polar shift theories assume you have to shift the whole axis of the earth 30 deg or more (~2000 miles) to have any kind of climatic affect. Questions of how to do this without MAJOR destruction, way past the "end of civilization" level get ignored. There are also questions of conservation of angular momentum etc that tend to get dismissed with handwaving. But if a very small shift in the axis of rotation of the core only is required, with the effects being multiplied by hyperdimensional energy coupling, those objections to "pole shifting" drop away. It just depends whose pole you are shifting. That reminds me of a lap dancer I once knew who....oops wrong forum. I digress. Time to shut up. Monday at 4:33pm · Vincent Cataldi [PDF] Methane Hydrates in CSEM Surveys - Analysis of a Recent Data Example http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=1&ved=0CBIQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emgs.com%2Fcontent.ap%3FthisId%3D417&ei=ISwETKLfFI7SNcTuTs&usg=AFQjCNH0FUaTbRV4iAjaEAK3xS--PIvxhw&sig2=WF_qIamWHQzzkaeNJqSxSA Monday at 4:40pm · Roo Reindeer Damn it. Asleep at the switch again on the last 6.4 in India, you can't take your eye off of the earth for a minute these days. Back to the plots. Monday at 7:56pm · Roo Reindeer Wouldn't ya know it this one occured at 1951 GMT close to lat 11 lon 93. Poor tetrahedral victims. ....why do these numbers keep dropping in like this? Monday at 8:02pm · Vincent Cataldi Roo : if this is not known to you, I suggest you try it: no windows install - tiny - visual too sweet to describe - set mag and date limits - spin the globe - watch the sequence as they run around the ring of fire; look through the globe, draw angles to the center, get depths. I love it !! Download Earthquake 3D EQuake3D.exe EARTHQUAKE 3D 2.2 6 posts - 4 authors - Last post: May 12, 2003 Earthquake3D ( Equake3D.exe) is a simple executable program. ... executable Equake3D.exe. It looks like the first screenshot and is not just ... www.pcreview.co.uk/forums/thread-1965704.php ............................................................ RE seismographs and ionosphere data: I am looking for the images from the 10:10 event on the 25th; am I hunting for the proper images - or better stated what one or more dates and times should I search for please? - I did try to save but got empty html shells - so I am on the hunt ! Yesterday at 3:58am · Vincent Cataldi All the Seismograms around the planet went crazy - UPDATED 06-01-10 http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=391178956491 Yesterday at 4:14am · Vincent Cataldi Roo: Chief: you too please, comment if you can; else I must assume an official: "No Comment" I pull my final question 'out of context' from the end of this post and paste it immediately below to attract more visibility; to seek more comments too.
Do you (anyone) have reason to tell me this is highly unlikely? ............................................................. I suspect this Concept IS related to what you discovered - yet only you are truly qualified to tell us if I am wrong with certainty; so I did research, compiling data so you could most easily give us all another assessment - an opinion I and others respect greatly. My question: can (should) we view the highly fractured Gulf of Mexico Impact Zone (Chicxulub Impact Crater ??), now ringed with (oil/gas producing) bore holes (vents), as a virtual "Caldera" ringed by virtual volcanoes; covered by an "explosive" cap of stratified rock embedded with temperamental MH - the virtual caldera cap over the virtual lava dome - and if no - why not ? One can envision for use the MH 'locked' precariously in the rock strata, from the ocean floor down to the crude oil/gas reservoir, as a blasting cap; a primer cascading to envelope the entire fractured circumference of, highly pressurized - explosively saturated - crude (lava) vault; which if 'energized properly' (naturally or otherwise) could flash-over as a grease fire of enormous scale ? ............................................................. http://www.facebook.com/notes/vincent-cataldi/methane-hydrate-frequency-dissociation/391923496491?ref=mf Yesterday at 1:35pm · Roo Reindeer Vincent I LIKE that cute little global indcator. Globes always give you a better idea of the connectivity of things then flat maps. It takes a monumental effort to visualize great circle routes on a map. They are grossly distorted sinusoids on a mercator. I have been marking some of the quakes on google earth, which is good for deeper analysis, but I like the quick and easy data on this new one. With regard to the data plots. I don't think it is legal to simply post the images from the realtime server. You can post a link but I don't think you can download the image then post a link to your downloaded copy....I think. I don't know the law but I believe the images are copy righted. The data, though, I think is public domain. If you plot it on your "own" graph and simply credit the source, you can post it. The program that allows downloading and replotting of the raw seismo data is "JWeed". http://www.iris.edu/manuals/jweed.htm click software/DMS software/downloads to get to the download page. I am still learning how to get the data from that program's downloads into manageable form. It is a case of information overload. it downloads dozens of plots from each station. I got 918 in all on my first attempt and each plot consisted of as many as a dozen traces. 10,000 traces can be hard to deal with ;-D. I need to be more selective then the defaults allow. The data can be saved in ASCII format for replotting in Excel or whatever. This will also make possible side by side comparisons and overlaps of data traces which is necessary to show correlations. The final plott can then be uploaded and if the data source is identified anyone can get the raw data to verify the graphs themselves. The Ion image data is likewise copy righted. But they also have ASCII data in their archives down below the image data. I believe that is also legal to post if it is replotted along with attribution. Again, that allows comparison plots as well, all on one graph. Although i will keep looking I have not seen anything really funny on the seismos since those two incidents. No precursers. Most of the data seems normal, a couple of mysterious data drops and weird plots but nothing that correlates. But if the quakes turn out to be related to the ION storms, and perhaps to the "How About Ripping & Rapeing the Planet" project, the Mid June window should prove oppurtune to watch the data. Richard said (I think) the 14th would be an interesting HD time window. Hopefully I should have the data from the May 25/26 events in a useable form by then for a quick comparison. By the doorbell do you mean my homepage? I was wondering if that was acessible with my current privacy settings. I originally had everthing restricted when I signed on here due to my naturally paranoid, antisocial and misanthropic nature ;-D If I want to let people see what is posted there do I just set it to "everybody". Does that mean everybody can post there as well? I have no idea how FB really works. I have just been treating it like an old fashioned BBS. I guess I have to get out of the 20th century, even if there are only 2 years left to this one. Yesterday at 1:57pm · Vincent Cataldi Roo: mouse can control speed and tilt of the globe; hold the mouse button over the Earth, and drag to adjust; I often tilt to view an upper or lower view for a better view of the poles. Also: select the slide bar for number of days; now slowly spin the mouse wheal to incrementally slide through a time line; same with the magnitudes- very fine control this way. It is sweet :) Yesterday at 2:03pm · Vincent Cataldi Roo: RE: "By the doorbell do you mean my homepage?" All your posts here are publicly viewable, and I archive into my "Notes" also, for public to find - and all my cross linking makes the search engines so happy. Regarding your homepage: You are locked up so tight that there is no way to even send you a PM, (nor allow friendly requests) :) Yesterday at 2:13pm · Vincent Cataldi Roo: In your system for modeling : 1.) does a polaral reversal also flow out of the data? and if yes, 2.) does it also allow for a polar reversal with no Pole Shift? 3.) are you manipulating manually and calculating the model or is there also software I can download to allow me to dig in deeper and study/help? I am downloading JWEEDv3.2 - next to get my real dual processor - multiterabyte hard drive system stable - and working on this - You are a gift; impossible to express the quality and quantity of smiles you bring me, as well as the intellectual thrill of jumping in the deep end to learn how to tread water - this is how I always have flourished beyond what even I have learned to expect.
Assign me tasks - put me to work if you can/wish - please. OR, send to best first HD read as an 'advanced' primer if this is required first. Thanks so much. - Vince 10 hours ago · Roo Reindeer I'll try playing with the privacy settings. Hell I got nothing on the page anyway. :-) As far as my modeling the Hyperdimensional stuff that's all qualitative speculation at the moment, with a bit of "hype' thrown in. I would like to get around to quantifying some of it but right now it just consists on some plausable physical ideas mostly based on conventional geophysics, astronomy, and astrophysics. I am inclined to apply Occams Razor on the one hand and the engineering principle of don't reinvent the wheel if you don't have to. I am making the assumption that there is something solid behind the Hyperdimensional Physics theories but I am inclined to limit the speculation to the main ideas such as that energy can flow from higher dimensions into ours for example. Also that rotation is the key to this transfer. But once the energy gets here I assume, until proven otherwise that the response to that energy is pretty much in accord with 300 years of accumulated information on the subject. The whole of contemporary physics may well end up being wrong at it's foundations but there is too much empirical data that is quantifiably predictable with current models to toss it out untill a new paradigm can produce the same numbers. So I mix and match the revolutionary with the mundane. Ii'll give an example of that as an answer to your polar shift question. There are three kinds of polar shift that tends to get discussed. Magnetic pole shift (or reversal), polar tilt (the shift of the angle of the tilt of the earths pole of daily rotation with respect to the plane of it's rotation around the sun, the ecliptic) and polar wander ( the movement of the imaginary point on the surface of the earth thru which the pole of daily rotation would poke if it was a real pole :). Magnetic pole shift is a known fact. The movements of the magnetic poles are continuous, their movements have been tracked since the 1600's. They also are known to have changed places many,many times in geological history. The dynamics of the inner earth are obviously a factor here. But other outside influences may have an effect. There are more ideas both mainstream and crackpot on what causes these reversals. then you can shake a stick at. I'll get back to that ;-) Polar tilt variations are also well known, there are a half dozen influences on polar tilt that are well quantified. The precession of the equnoxes caused by the wobble in the tilt, about 26000 years The change in the angle of the tilt, known as the obliquity, about 40,000 years. The superposition of other small wobbles on these main ones by variations in the motion of the moon etc. Also very small herky jerky movements caused by major quakes. There is also the posibility that a near encounter with a large solar system object could torque the earth due to it's non sphereical shape and cause a fast shift in this inclination ala Velikovsky. Einstein supported Velikovsky on this possibility, although he refused to go along with Velikovskys more radical ideas on electromagnatism having more to do with celestial mechanics then gravity. Why...Occam's Razor. Einstein felt all of Velikovsky's observations could be explained within the prevailing framework. If it ain't broke don't fix it :-) Actually Velikovsky may be right in the long run. But Einstein was right about not needing his radical ideas at that time. While the polar tilt affects astronomical obsevations since the earths tilt with repect to the planes of the orbits of the other planets changes and the polar axis points to a new position in the sky, it would have no affect on Google maps. The position with respect to the earth's pole of rotation of all the other points on earth remains fixed. The longitude and latitude shown on maps doesn't change. Take a globe and randomly tilt it and you see the lon/lat grid remains the same. Greenwhich remains at 0 deg long, Quito remains on the equator. Polar wander changes that. Take a globe, remove the pins holding it in it's support ring and rotate it to a new position. Push the pins back in and spin it. you may see the old lon/lat grid printed on the globe but they no longer work. You need to draw a new series of lines parallel to the new equator and perpendicular to it, passing thru the new poles. This gives each point a new lon/lat which you cant hen use to make new maps. Polar wander is also accepted as a fact by mainstream science. It is just a question of how often, how far, how fast. Hapgood had theories about polar wander in the 50's that went against the grain with most geophysicists, despite a lot of indications he was on to something. Coincidentily Einstein also supported his claims even writeing a forward for one of his books. I always liked Albert, he had good intuitions. Also he had nothing to lose from a professional standpoint, no one was going to dump him from the faculty for being controversial. He could afford to think independently. It helps to pay your dues early on. In the words of the legendary Monty Python group : "NOW FOR SOMETHING COMPLETELY DIFFERENT !!! What I am suggesting is a different type of polar wander. I have empirical indications, without any contemporary theoretical motivation, that the core and/or mantle may be rotating about a different axis then the crust. Being fluid even if extremely viscous it needn't co-rotate with the crust. There is no known reason that this would be impossible. The empirical evidence consists of most of the phenomenon taken as given by contemporary geophysicists. The distribution of hotspots, island arcs, seafloor rifts, many earthquake zones, the directions of contenental drifts etc. all take on a very symmetric form when viewed from the standpoint of this axis of internal rotation. If the core and/or mantle rotate around this offset axis many things fall into place. Many of the main geophysical features follow lines parallel to the equator defined by this axis of rotation. Others line up along meridians, it seems they are following what would be called zonal harmonics in the convective flow patterns. The deviations from this ideal only seem to occur when a continent or other major feature gets in the way, disturbing the flow at a local level. I call this axis therfore the Axis Of Convection. If an imaginary lon/lat grid is placed on the earth with regard to this axis we get different co-ordinates for each point on the globe except one. That one point depends on the location of the poles of the axis. As I stated in my other post the point that seems special based on the position of the pole derived from the empirical data turns out to be at the location of the Hawaiian hot spot. The prime point on the planet from a Tetrahedral standpoint. This is what convinced me it could not be a coincidence. There must be a Hyperdimensional Physics tie in here. I will continue in the next post. 3 hours ago · Roo Reindeer As I said in the other posts this axis may change as the earth moves through the galaxy, as it's normal axis of rotation precesses, etc. It may also move on it's own in response to Hyperdimentional alignments or precess due to normal Newtonian torques. it could move for any number of possible theoretical reasons both mainstream or alternative. What I postulate happens when it does move however involves the channeling of energy from higher dimensions in a tetrahedral based geomety familiar to Hyperdimensional Physics fans. Due to the tetrahedral geometry of the hyperspacial connection the two different axies of rotation are pinned together at the tetrahedral vertex they share in common as they wobble about this common point. I will try and eventually put up some graphics to show this. But for know imagine the earth has a tetrahedron in it's interior that is lined up with the normal polar axis. As the earth rotates the tetrhedron rotates with it. Now imagine another axis going thru the earth offset with respect to the normal axis. Imagine that this axis also has a tetrahedron associated with it. Make one more assumption, that one of the three vertices at the 19.5 point on each of the offset tetrahedrons remains in contact with its counterpart. In our case that point would correspond with the Hawaiin hotspot. As these two axes rotate, at different rates, the two 19.5 points remain together. One axis will gyrate about the other. If you can visualise this you will see two spheres partially mergeing with one another as they overlap and seperate again. If the axes were to move with respect to each other until their poles lined up then the two spheres would merge, continuallly. Any offset produces a periodic phase in and phase out of the overlapping volumes. The degree of overlap at any moment determines the rate of energy flow. At the locked point some energy always flows. Hawaii, Mons Olympica, the Red Spot. But the rate of flow overall into the rotating body depends on the time average of the degree of overlap. That varies with the rate of rotation of the two axes and their relative angle. If they line up the two tetrahedrons cease to wobble with respect to one another. The overlap is 100% and continuous, all three of the tetrahedral vertices at the 19.5 point are congruent and maximum energy transfer flow can take place. You no longer have Hawaii, Mons Olymica and the Red Spot. You have a potential sun. Boom goes Tom van Flanderns planet, sizzle goes Venus, bigtime fart for the Earth at the KT.
Of couse we are not talking 'real tetrahedrons' in any material sense but a mathematical representation of underlying physics of a 4 space geometry. The actual coupling points would be connections between HyperTetrahedrons. In our 3d space the tetrahedron we know and love is the shadow cast by a HyperTet. Just as a cube is the shadow cast by a hyper cube and the square is a shadow cast by a cube into flatlands 2D world. Consequently an actual visualisation of the overlap between these objects is not possible. But the degree of overlap is quantifiable. This determines the rate of energy flow. Other factors such as material, angular momentum, electomagnetic properties etc would probably have an affect on the actual flow in any given real life situation. but these factors would be modulated by the degree of Hyperspacial overlap determined by the offset of the axes of rotation. With a planet sized object you can't do too much about the axial offset. I hope...if it is possible to mess with it we are in terminally deep shit..well there is HARRP (Not HAARP :-). however this hyperspacial overlap can be controlled with small rotating objects by .....stay tuned. 3 hours ago · Vincent Cataldi Vincent Cataldi Roo: I missed the polar shift angle - we posted concurrently. Your mind :) Chief: You too please ! Comment if you can; else I must assume an official: EM HD MH "No Comment" [EnterpriseMission - HyperDimensional Physics - Methane Hydrate] I pull my final question 'out of context' from the end of this post and paste it immediately below to attract more visibility; to seek more comments too. Do you (anyone) have reason to tell me this is highly unlikely? ............................................................. I suspect this Concept IS related to what you discovered - yet only you are truly qualified to tell us if I am wrong with certainty; so I did research, compiling data so you could most easily give us all another assessment - an opinion I and others respect greatly. My question: can (should) we view the highly fractured Gulf of Mexico Impact Zone (Chicxulub Impact Crater ??), now ringed with (oil/gas producing) bore holes (vents), as a virtual "Caldera" ringed by virtual volcanoes; covered by an "explosive" cap of stratified rock embedded with temperamental MH - the virtual caldera cap over the virtual lava dome - and if no - why not ? One can envision for use the MH 'locked' precariously in the rock strata, from the ocean floor down to the crude oil/gas reservoir, as a blasting cap; a primer cascading to envelope the entire fractured circumference of, highly pressurized - explosively saturated - crude (lava) vault; which if 'energized properly' (naturally or otherwise) could flash-over as a grease fire of enormous scale ? ............................................................. http://www.facebook.com/notes/vincent-cataldi/methane-hydrate-frequency-dissociation/391923496491?ref=mf
http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=213984790088&share_id=121508717889272&comments=1#s121508717889272 Vincent Cataldi -> Richard C. Hoagland: methane hydrate frequency - dissociation www.facebook.com Yesterday at 1:57pm · Comment · Like · Share Roo Reindeer Question:.....should we worry about the Chicxulub/ Gulf area as a sort of caldera......(not a direct quote) ? Short answer: YES! YES! YES! Long answer :-D Here's why. The cool part is I thought of none of this until you asked about the gulf/Chicxulub, talk about synchronocity! When you posted your note on super volcanoes and mentioned Yellowstone I went into a long winded diatribe on my own research in the possibility of a Axis of Convection around which the earths core and mantel rotate. The north pole of this axis seems to be near 39 N 120 E. I won't repeat the Hyperdimentional aspects of that here, anyone interested can read my original that you reposted. It's the one that starts: " Vincent I'm glad you mentioned Yellowstone...." At the time I had not read your speculation on Chicxulub and the surrounding area. At the present time Chicxulub is near 19.5 north. This is interesting in itself from a tetrahedral standpoint. The Chicxulub event has been attributed to an impact at 65MYA, said impact being caused according to some by a fragment of Tom van Flanderns Exploding Planet which also wiped the butt of Mars according to the Enterprise Mission Tidal Model. If the same Hyperdimentional energy coupling which caused the planet around which Mars was orbiting to explode had also caused the earths core to heat up at the approximate same time the Chicxulub event may have been the ultimate super volcano, not an impact. The natural place for this energy release would have been latitude 19.5! As I mentioned in my Convective Axis post, Hawaii, the worlds major hotspot at the present ends up at near it's present 19.5 latitude in the alternate longietude/latitude coordinate system based on 39N and 120E. This is the only point on earth that stays on the same line of latitude in both the normal and convective axis based coordinate systems. Just now I went back to check my map based on a pole located at 39N 120 W. Where says I will Chicxulub end up with regard to my new longe/lat grid? With this coordinate system the 19.5 SOUTH latitude line cuts right through the center of the Gulf of Mexico I could not have done this on purpose with any better fit. This shows, at least to my biased mind..yes..yes I love coincidences :-D, that the Gulf/Chicxulub area is a VERY IMPORTANT TETRAHEDRAL POINT. It, like Hawaii is at an important tetrahedral point in both coordinate systems. If my idea about hyperdimentional Coupling being modulated by the offset between the normal (3D ) polar axis and the convective(hyperdimentional) core axis has anything to it then a closer alignment 65MYA could have caused the blowout. And here's the real trip. If the coupling is dependent on the tangent of the angle of the latitude of the convective axis pole with respect to the normal pole you can get maximum energy transfer at either latitude +/- 90. Minimum if the axis is offset so that the convective pole is on our present equator. But the hotspots will change place with respect to the convective grid as the convective pole moves. With a reversed orientation the hotspot would be at 19.5 S in the convective grid. Did the earths convective axis do a flip 65MYA causeing a major energy release at the spot corresponding to latitude 19.5 south in the convective axis coordinate system (still 19.5 north in the normal grid ie nothing changes on the surface of the earth) before continuing passed the danger point to it's present position leaving our current hotspot (Hawaii) at 19.5 N in both grid systems ? Did this occur fast enough to avoid a long dwell at the angle that would have caused the Earth to go the way of Mar's parent? Remember I said that the Convective Axis can shift fast. It does not require any movement of the earth's crust. Only the rotation of the convective flow has to flip, molten core or mantel current can change orientation with much less stress then the crust. Is there any evidence of this convective axis flip? Well Venus is rotating opposite to the earth, it's "upside down". Venus also appears to have undergone a complete "resurfaceing". It's present surface seems to be way younger then the surface of Earth or Mars. Some studies place it at about 65MYA (others 400MYA, nobody really knows ,but it is young).
I say (ex cathedra of course) that 65MYA the Hyperdimentional Alignments caused the axis of convection of the Earth, Venus, Mars parent and other solar system objects to move and as they did they got close to a line up with their normal polar axes, which remained, and continue to remain fixed. This occured as the current "North" pole of the axis of convection, whose position is modulated by hyperdimentional factors moved from latitude -39 (where it was then) northward to latitude 90 (the danger zone) then back down the other side to latitude +39 (where it is today). In other words a 180 flip. This would have caused the rotational orientation of the convection currents to flip. It would now be opposite to what it was then . In the case of Mars parent the convective pole took longer to pass the danger point of extreme energy release caused by it's close position to the normal pole. or it just got closer to a perfect (supernova) alignment. it blew up. Venus also got so hot the energy release melted it's entire crust. With a total meltdown the entire body of the planet assumed the same rotational direction as the core, the new crust took on the same rotational direction of the core convection as it cooled. It rotates backwards in relation to it's prior direction. The Earth got off easy, just the KT extinction. As the pole of the axis of convection (+39deg) may now be moving north, the Gulf/Chicxulub area might turn out to be a KT hotspot AGAIN. Which brings us back to the question...do the PTB and their cronies at BP and elsewhere know this...or am I a nut. .......stay tuned :-D 9 hours ago · Vincent Cataldi You Always deliver what I hope for : many fold over :) Here is a cute set of factoids. About why Deep Water Horizon's position may be important. Tetrahedrally speaking. As I said in the previous post the coodinates of the Gulf of Mexico would be about latitude -19.5 degrees in a coordinate system based on what I call the Earths Axis of Convection. This places Deep Horizon at -17.5 S in the new grid. The placement of the pole of the new grid is based on empirical observation of hotspots. It came out to about lat 39/lon120 without any force fit. bur since lat 39 is so important tetrahedrally I am assumeing that is the actual latitude.The longitude of 120 E puts Deep Horizon at latitude -17.3 S. If the longitude is moved to 116 E the fit gets tetrahedrally better 18.6 S. Now i realize you can't just put the pole anywhere you want to make numbers fit. that's bogus. But the exact position has not yet been determined by me. The original data, hot spot lines, have a scatter and fitting them to an equatorial line naturally allows some leeway and judgement. The pole of this equatorial line will come out NEAR 39N/120E for sure. As I said above setting it at 39N to check for tetrahedral signs makes sense. that is how you test theories. If it is assumed to be right on 39N that still leaves a bit of leeway in the longitude to get a best fit. In this case the difference is small although the position of Deep Horizon gets "better'. But what else is special about lat 39N/116? Effing Beijing...that's what!! I read years ago that after the revolution the communists moved the capital back to Beijing from Nanking. Beijing was alledgedly chosen by some method relating to Chinese astrology. Some said the communists wanted a capital north of Washington DC. The real astrological reasons are probably much more complex.I know nothing of Chinese astrology so I can't say. But like everone on this board I know lat 39 is important. The Chinese astrological system most likely considers it important too. More so if it is based on ancient knowlege of tetrahedral physics. But why lon 116? because someone there also knows that that number is importsnt. They may not know about the idea that the earth has an inner axis of convection with the pole at (or near) that point (does ANYONE know this, or is it just my crackpot idea alone), but they know it is "important" and so they chose that site. Those lousy communists pretending to be Marxist/materialist/atheists..shame shame. They turn out to be Masons too :-D Goodnews/badnews: The astrological siteing of Beijing lends credence to the idea that lat 39N lon (~120E) has signifigant meaning. Ancient knowlage systems may have used that position as a source of a grid system for laying out many sites. The most important ones may have tetrahedrally important locations in both the standard polar grid AND the covective polar grid. I will try and look into this. Bad news; China's capital sits atop the convective pole. If my somewhat scatterbrained ideas concerning getting any energy to flow into our mundane 3D world from the tetrahedral hyperspace around us is correct, they may have a big edge. The south pole in this grid is near Buenos Aires., just off the coast,well known NAZI fugitive country...hmmmm. The Falklands also lie on the anti-meridian in this grid and are the closest land to the south convective pole not actually in South America. Perhaps the Lion roared a few decades back because the NAZI inspired Argentines were tryin to pick the pocket of The House of Windsor. Could be valuable real estate. Last but not least since i started out with Deep (Water) Horizon. If you think of the idea that it's location is at ~18 S in the convective grid that location would be "deep below the horizon" viewed from it's present location...nah thats too much of a stretch. Then again DH is HD spelled backwards :-D Time to quit, I'm getting out of line here. ........................................................ I would love to see a screen shot or so; love the effort, ideas, help, humor - the mind in action :) PS - ABC is messing with me or the data is still loading; says busy for hours now: ABC is "Not So Awful" Yesterday at 11:47am · Roo Reindeer Vincent; my post up there about the "long answer" has your name on it. Did I post it in the wrong place and you moved it? Or are YOU the secret spammer taking over peoples posts? Talk about a deep mole :-) Yesterday at 12:04pm · Vincent Cataldi No Roo: : Original is still where you posted; it is also already in the archive; and sent to thousands in my energy groups for safty and cascading re-distribution; Iit is fight for the prime real estate I dragged it up: it my LIFO policy - Last in First Out :