You are on page 1of 6

Sixth International Conference on

Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics


August 1 6, 2016, IIT Roorkee Extension Centre, 20 Knowledge Park II, Greater Noida, India

EVALUATION OF DYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF SAND-LOW PLASTICITY CLAY


FINES MIXTURES
Muttana S Balreddy
Research Scholar, IISc, Bangalore &
Asst. Professor, Dept. of Civil Engg,
Siddaganga Institute of Technology,
Tumakuru, Karnataka

S V Dinesh
Professor,
Dept. of Civil Engg.,
Siddaganga Institute of Technology,
Tumakuru, Karnataka

T G Sitharam
Professor,
Dept. of Civil Engg.,
Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore

ABSTRACT
Dynamic deformation characteristics of soil namely shear modulus and damping are input parameters for the soil dynamic problems
such as ground response analysis, soil structure interaction problems, response of marine sediments and marine structures to wave
induced cyclic loading. In this paper, a series of laboratory undrained stress controlled cyclic triaxial shear tests were conducted on
reconstituted samples of sand-fines mixtures to evaluate the dynamic properties. Sand was procured from Cauvery river bed,
Karnataka and locally available low plasticity clay fines were used to prepare sand-fines mixtures. The results indicate that shear
modulus decreases with increase in fines content and damping ratio decrease with increase in plasticity index.

INTRODUCTION
Engineers are concerned with the design and construction of
civil structures and are obliged to perform calculations which
demonstrate the safety and serviceability of new structures.
But before these calculations are performed, the mechanical
behaviour of engineering materials such as steel, concrete and
soil must be understood. The Earthquake induced dynamic
activities are the major destructors for the infrastructure such
as bridges, slopes and embankments. The response of soil
subjected to dynamic loads will be governed by the dynamic
properties of soils which are expressed in terms of shear
modulus and damping ratio. Many investigations based on
laboratory and field testing have revealed that the dynamic
properties namely, shear modulus and damping ratio are
influenced factors like soil type, plasticity index, cyclic strain
amplitude, relative density, frequency, confining pressure,
overconsolidation ratio and number of loading cycles (Hardin
and Drnevich.,1972, Iwasaki et al., 1978, Kokusho., 1980.,
Ishibashi & Zhang., 1993 and Vucetic and Dobry., 1991).
Empirical relationships between shear modulus and confining
pressure based on void ratio/relative density, confining
pressure and shear strain amplitude were proposed by many
researchers (Hardin and Drnevich., 1970, Seed and Idriss.,
1970, Seed et al., 1986, Silver and Park., 1975, Sitharam et al.,
2004, Sitharam et al., 2004,). The dynamic properties of clays
depends upon factors i.e., void ratio, confining pressure, grain

Paper No. 54

size, overconsolidation, ageing, plasticity, strain rate, and


number of loading cycles that have significance influence
(Hardin and Richart., 1963, Iwasaki and Tatsuoka., 1977,
Kokusho et al ., 1982, Seed et al., 1986, Sun et al., 1988,
Vucetic and Dobry., 1991 and Wang and Kuwano., 1999).
Similarly, empirical relationships for the initial shear modulus
and dynamic properties of pure clays and sand-fines mixtures
have been proposed (Kokusho et al., 1982, Zen et al., 1987,
Vucetic and Dobry., 1991, Ishibashi and Zhang., 1993, Dinesh
et al., 2008, Yamada et al., 2008 a, b). Many researchers such
as (Hanumantharao and Ramana., 2008, Sitharam et al., 2011,
Dinesh et al., 2011 and Maheshwari et al., 2012) have studied
dynamic properties of sand-fines mixtures experimentally.
Significant reductions in the small-strain stiffness of sand with
addition of silt i.e., shear modulus decreases with increase in
silt content (Randolph et al., 1994). Small-strain stiffness at a
given relative density and confining pressure decreases
dramatically with the addition of small percentage of silt
(Salgado et al., 2000). There are limited number of studies on
dynamic properties of sand-fines mixtures. Therefore, there is
a need for further investigation of the dynamic properties of
sand-fines mixtures. In the present paper the results of
undrained cyclic triaxial tests on remolded sand-fines mixtures
have been analyzed to determine the shear modulus and
damping properties.

EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAMME

Materials used
For the present experimental investigation the materials used
are sand and clayey sand soil. Sand samples were collected
from Cauvery river bed, Karnataka state and clayey sand from
a local site near Tumakuru. Figure 1 shows the grain size
distribution curves for both the soils and curves for
liquefaction susceptible soils proposed by Tsuchida (1970). It
is observed that the Cauvery river sand lies within the
boundaries of most liquefiable soils. The sand is basically
angular in shape. The specific gravity (G) is 2.62, co-efficient
of curvature (Cc) is 0.9 and co-efficient of uniformity (Cu) is
2.4. The other engineering properties of sand and fines used
are mentioned in Table 1. From the above data according to IS
classification, the sand is classified as poorly graded sand (SP)
and the soil is classified as clayey sand (SC).

Sand (%)

100

53

Silt (%)

28

Clay (%)

18

Cu

2.4

Cc

0.9

emax

0.99

emin

0.72

Liquid Limit (%)

46

Plastic Limit (%)

27

Plasticity Index

19

IS classification

SP

SC

Sand-Fines Mixtures
In order to understand the influence of fines on dynamic
properties, fines were separated from the clayey sand and
mixed with Cauvery river sand to prepare the sand-fines
mixtures. The details of sand-fines mixtures prepared are
shown in Table 2. The fines fraction of size less than 0.075mm
was separated from clayey sand and used as fines in the
experimental program. These clay fines were mixed with the
Cauvery river sand (S1) in various proportions (S1:90 + F1:10
and S1:80 + F1:20). The index properties of sand-fines
mixtures are shown in Table 2. The grain size distribution
curves of sand-fines mixtures used in the present investigation
are shown in Fig. 3.

Fig.1. Grain size distribution curves of Cauvery river clean


sand (S1), Clay sand and liquefaction susceptible soils
(Tsuchida, 1970)
Table 1 Index Properties of Cauvery river sand and clayey
sand

Specific Gravity (G)

Cauvery
river clean
sand
(S1)
2.62

Gravel (%)

Properties

Clayey
sand
(F1)
2.65
Fig.3. Grain size distribution curves of sand-fines mixtures

01

Table 2 Index properties of S1 sand and sand-fines mixtures


Soil
mixtures

Fines
(%)

D10

Cu

Cc

emax

emin

LL

PI

IS
Classification

S1:100

0.25

2.36

0.93

0.99

0.72

SP

S1:90+F1:10

10

0.13

3.46

1.54

0.98

0.60

22

SP-SM

Paper No. 54

S1:80+F1:20

20

0.08

5.25

1.86

Sample preparation
Triaxial specimens of 50 mm diameter and height 100 mm
were prepared by dry deposition method. The required mass of
oven dried Cauvery river sand (S1) and clay fines
corresponding to gross void ratio of 0.794, 0.755 and 0.717
were weighed separately and both mixtures were divided into
ten equal parts. The sand and clay fines were mixed uniformly
and each part was gently poured into the mould in dry state
with zero fall height so that a loose soil sample is formed. It
was then gently tamped by a wooden mallet giving uniform
blows on all the four sides, so that the required relative density
is achieved. In this way, the sample was prepared by filling the
mould in ten layers of equal height. Then the sample was
subjected to small vacuum and carbon-dioxide gas was passed
for one hour. After this, de-aired distilled water was drained
through soil sample at a very small head of 5 kPa. The
specimens were saturated by applying a back pressure of
100kPa and saturation time was maintained till the
Skemptons pore pressure coefficient B value exceeds
0.96.Required cell pressure (100kPa) was applied and
specimens were isotropically consolidated till the end of
Casagrandes primary consolidation. In this way, all the
samples were prepared at gross void ratio of 0.794, 0.755 and
0.717 before consolidation and after consolidation the void
ratio of the samples were around 0.752, 0.719 and 0.670.

1.06

S1:100

S1:90+F1:10

S1:80+F1:20

0.855
0.828

0.150,0.190,0.200,0.250
0.198,0.220,0.267,0.289

0.801

70

0.230,0.250,0.300,0.320

0.747

90

0.296,0.281,0.260,0.210

0.792

50

0.145,0.161,0.180,0.200

0.752
0.719
0.670
0.837
0.794
0.747
0.698

60
70
80
50
60
70
80

0.145,0.151,0.187,0.207
0.152,0.168,0.187,0.210
0.190,0.202,0.207,0.239
0.115,0.136,0.156,0.177
0.150,0.140,0.130,0.110
0.110,0.111,0.158,0.261
0.190,0.202,0.207,0.239

Void
Ratio

Cyclic Stress Ratio

SP-SC

Evaluation of dynamic properties


For the cyclic loading, sinusoidal harmonic loading was
applied at a frequency of 0.1 Hz under stress controlled
technique. The tests were carried out at different stress
amplitude and void ratios. The slope of secant line connecting
the extreme points on the hysteresis loop is the dynamic
youngs modulus, E, which is given by

Further,

and

Where
Soil
mixtures

26

(1996) and ASTM D 3999-91 (2003) codes were followed for


conducting tests. The loading system consists of a submersible
load cell and the deformation was measured by LVDT. Pore
water pressure and cell pressures were recorded with pressure
sensors. The data was acquired by a computer controlled data
acquisition system (CCDAS). 128 data points were captured in
each loading cycle. The cyclic stress, axial strain, pore water
pressure and confining pressures are the test parameters and
were recorded by CCDAS. Tests were continued till excess
pore water pressure is equal to confining pressure or the
double amplitude axial strain is in excess of 5%.

Table 2 Cyclic triaxial test program on sand and sand-fines


mixtures at 100kPa confining pressure and 0.1Hz frequency
Relative
Density
(%)
50
60

0.61

E d /

(1)

(2)

E
21

= Deviator stress,

= Shear strain

(3)

= Axial strain

and = Poissons ratio that may be taken as 0.5 for saturated


undrained specimens (Rollins et al., 1998). The damping ratio
(h), is a measure of dissipated energy versus elastic energy,
and may be computed from the equation

AL
4 AT

(4)

where AL= Area enclosed by hysteresis loop, AT= Area


enclosed by the shaded triangle as shown in the Fig. 4

Stress controlled tests


In order to simulate the stress conditions prevailing during
earthquakes, undrained stress controlled, constant amplitude
cyclic loading tests were performed on isotropically
consolidated samples at a frequency of 0.1 Hz. ASTM D 5311

Paper No. 54

Fig.4. Hysteresis Stress-Strain for cyclic Loading (Sitharam et


al., 2004)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Effect of Relative density on shear modulus and damping
ratio
Figure 5 shows the shear modulus versus single amplitude
shear strain for the clean sand for relative densities varying
from 50% to 90% at 100kPa confining pressure. The shear
modulus decreases with increase in magnitude of shear strain.
Since, the cyclic triaxial test equipment is a large strain facility
the shear modulus corresponding to maximum strain of
0.045% could be recorded and at this strain the shear modulus
value is 16 to 18 kN/m2. In the lower strain ranges the shear
modulus increase with increase in relative density. However
the cyclic stress amplitude will vary from 0.15 to 0.23, stress
amplitude will affect the modulus value. Therefore it would be
better to consider the effect of relative density at constant
stress amplitude.
Figure 6 shows the shear modulus versus single amplitude
shear strain at constant stress amplitude (CSR=0.20) for
relative densities of 50% and 60%. The shear modulus is strain
dependent and decreases with increase in shear strain. It is
observed that both the curves overlap at all strain levels which
indicate shear modulus is independent of relative density at
constant stress amplitude.

Fig. 6. Shear modulus versus single amplitude axial strain for


various relative densities at constant stress amplitude
Figure 7 shows the plot of damping ratio versus single
amplitude axial strain. It is observed that the damping ratio is
increasing with increase in the shear strain. Damping ratio
decreases with increase of relative density.

Fig.7. Damping ratio versus single amplitude shear strain for


various relative densities
Effect of Fines on shear modulus and damping ratio

Fig. 5. Shear modulus versus single amplitude axial strain at


varying relative densities

Paper No. 54

In the present work, the effect of fines content on the dynamic


properties is examined. Figure 8 shows the effect of fines on
shear modulus of soil samples containing Cauvery river sand
with different percentage of F1 fines (10% and 20%) at a
confining pressure of 100 kPa and 0.1 Hz frequency. Addition
of clay fines will partially fill the voids of the sand matrix and
in the presence of water lubricate the contact surfaces and
facilitate the sliding of sand particles. Therefore, the shear
modulus decreases with addition of clay fines. From the
literature also it is evident that the modulus deceases till
limiting void ratio. Boulanger and Idriss., 2004 have reported
that sand like behavior is observed; showing a decrease in
liquefaction resistance till PI of the mixtures is equal to 7. The
trends of the present results are in agreement with the
published results. However, the reduction in shear modulus
with 10% and 20% fines is nearly same.

Figure 9 shows the plot of damping ratio versus shear strain


for samples containing F1 fines for 0% to 20% fines. The
results show that damping increases with increase in strain
amplitude. Cauvery river sand has higher damping ratio at all
strain levels when compared with sand-fines mixtures.
Damping ratio of sand-fines mixture is low and it decreases
with increase in PI value. Addition of fines decreases damping
ratio.

modulus for non-plastic to low plastic (PI 6) sand-fines


mixtures is same and independent of fines content.
3.

The damping ratio increases with increase in the shear


strain amplitude and with the addition of fines damping
ratio of sand-fines mixtures decreases over a wide range
strain. Damping ratio decreases with increase in PI.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The first two authors thank AICTE for funding the research
project tilted Liquefaction potential of Sand-clay Mixtures
under RPS scheme No.:20/AICTE/RIFD/RPS(POLICYIII)31/2012-13.

REFERNCES
1. ASTM D 5311(1996). Standard test methods for load
controlled cyclic triaxial strength of soil, American
Society for Testing and Materials, USA
Fig.8. Shear modulus versus single amplitude axial strain for
sand-fines mixtures at constant relative density

2. ASTM Standard D 3999-91 (2003), Test Method for the


Determination of the Modulus and Damping properties of
Soils Using the Cyclic Triaxial Apparatus, American
Society for Testing and Materials, USA
3. Dinesh, S., Yamada, S., and Hyodo, M. (2008), Low
Strain Shear Modulus of Sand-Clay Mixtures.
GeoCongress,
Geosustainability
and
Geohazard
Mitigation, GSP 178, 335-342
4. Dinesh, S V., Mahesh Kumar, G., Muttana, S. B. and
Swamy, B.C. (2011), Liquefaction potential of Sabarmati
river sand ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology. Vol.
48, No 2-4, 61-71.

Fig.9. Damping ratio versus shear strain for sand-fines


mixtures of different plasticity index

CONCLUSIONS
A laboratory experimental programme involving a series of
stress controlled undrained cyclic triaxial tests were carried
out on sand-fines mixture to evaluate the influence of fines
content on dynamic properties. Based on the analysis of the
experimental results the following concluding remarks are
made.
1. The shear modulus is strain dependent and decreases with
increase in shear strain. At low strain levels shear
modulus of sand is independent of relative density.
2.

For sand-fines mixtures with PI 6, the shear modulus


decrease with the addition of fines. The reduction in shear

Paper No. 54

5. Hanumantharao, C. and Ramana, G.V. (2008), Dynamic


soil properties for microzonation of Delhi, India, Journal
of Earth System and Science, Vol. 117, S2, 719 730.
6. Hardin, B. O. and Drnevich, V. P. (1970), Shear modulus
and damping in soils - ii: Design equations and curves.
Technical Report UKY 27-70-CE3, Soil Mechanics Series
No. 2, University of Kentucky.
7. Hardin, B. O. and Richart, F. E. (1963), Elastic wave
velocities in Granular soils, Journal of Soil Mechanics
and Foundations Divisions, Vol. 89, No. SM1, 33-65.
8. Hardin, B.O. and Drnevich, V.P. (1972), Shear modulus
and damping in soils: Measurement and parameter
effects, Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation
Division, ASCE, 98 (6), 603- 624.
9. Ishibashi, I. and Zhang, X. (1993), Unified dynamic shear

moduli and damping ratios of sand and clay, Soils and


Foundations, Vol. 33, No. 1, 182- 191.
10. Iwasaki, T. Tatsouka, F. and Takagi, Y. (1978), Shear
moduli of sands under cyclic torsional shear loading,
Soils and Foundation, 18 (1), 39- 56.
11. Iwasaki, T. and Tatsuoka, F. (1977), Effects of grain size
and grading on dynamic shear moduli of sands. Soils and
Foundations, Vol. 17, No. 3, 19-35.
12. Kokusho, T. (1980), Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil
properties for wide strain range, Soils and Foundations,
Vol. 20, No. 2, 45-59.
13. Kokusho, T., Yoshida, Y., and Esashi, Y. (1982).
Dynamic properties of soft clay for wide strain range.
Soils and Foundations, Vol. 22, pp. 1-18.
14. Kumar S S, Murali Krishna A, Dey A., (2014),
Parameters Influencing Dynamic Soil Properties: A
Review Treatise, International Journal of Innovative
Research in Science, Engineering and Technology,
Volume 3, Special Issue 4, 47-60.
15. Maheshwari B.K., Kale S.S. and Kaynia A.M. (2012),
"Dynamic Properties of Solani Sand at Large Strains: A
Parametric Study", International Journal of Geotechnical
Engineering, Vol. 6, issue 3, 353-358.
16. Randolph, M. F., Dolwin, J and Beck, R. (1994), Design
of driven piles in sand,. Geotechnique, 44(3):427448.
17. Rollins K.M., Evans M., Diehl N. and Daily W. (1998),
Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels,
Journal of Geotechnical and Geoevironmental Engrg., 124
(5), 396-405.
18. Salgado, R., Bandini, P., and Karim, A. (2000), Shear
strength and stiffness of silty sand. Journal Geotechnical
and Geoenvironmental Engrg, ASCE, Vol.126 (5), 451462.
19. Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M. (1970). Soil moduli and
damping factors for dynamic response analysis. EERC
Report No. 70-10, Earthquake Engineering Research
Center, University of California, Berkeley.
20. Seed, H.B., Wong, R.T., Idriss, I.M. and Tokimatsu, T.
(1986), Moduli and damping factors for dynamic analyses
of cohesionless soils, Journal of Soil Mechanics and
Foundation Division, ASCE, Vol. 112 (SM11), 10161032.

22. Sitharam, T. G., GovindaRaju, L and Sridharan, A. (2004),


Dynamic properties and liquefaction potential of soils,
Current Science, Special Section: Geotechnics and
Earthquake Hazards, Vol. 87, No. 10, 1370-1378.
23. Sitharam, T G., Ravishankar, B.V. and Vinod, J.S (2011),
Dynamic Properties of Sandy Soils at Large Shear Strains
with Special Reference to the Influence of Non-Plastic
Fines International Journal of Geotechnical Earthquake
Engineering (IJGEE), Volume 2, Issue 2, 13 pages.
24. Sitharam, T.G., GovindaRaju, L. and Murthy, B.R.S.
(2004), Evaluation of liquefaction
potential
and
dynamic properties of silty sand using cyclic triaxial
testing Geotechnical Testing Journal, Vol. 27, No. 5,
Paper ID GTJ11894.
25. Sun, J. I., Golesorkhi, R., and Seed, H. B. (1988).
"Dynamic Moduli and Damping Ratios for Cohesive
Soils," Report No. UCB/EERC-88/15, Earthquake
Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering,
University of California, Berkeley, California.
26. Tsuchida H. (1970), Prediction and Countermeasures
against the liquefaction in sand deposits, Abstract of the
seminar in the Port and Harbor Research Institute 3.13.33.
27. Vucetic, M.V. and Dobry, R. (1991), Effect of soil
plasticity on cyclic response, Journal of Geotechnical
Engineering, ASCE, 117, 89- 107.
28. Wang, G.X and Kuwano, J (1999), Shear Modulus and
Damping of Clayey Sands, Journal of Earthquake
Engineering, Vol. 3, No. 2, 271-285
29. Yamada, S., Hyodo, M., Orense, R.P. and Dinesh, S.V.
(2008a), Initial shear modulus of remolded sand-clay
mixtures, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental
Engineering, Vol 134, No.7, ASCE, 960-971.
30. Yamada, S., Hyodo, M., Orense, R.P. and Dinesh, S.V.
(2008b), Strain-dependent dynamic properties of
remolded sand-clay mixtures, Journal of Geotechnical
and Geo-environmental Engineering, Vol 134, No.7,
ASCE, 972-982.
31. Zen, K., Yamazaki, H. and Umehara, Y. (1987),
Experimental study on dynamic properties of soils for use
in seismic response analysis, Report of Port and Harbour
Research Institute, Vol. 26, No. 1, Port and Harbour
Research Institute, Yokosuka, Japan.

21. Silver, M. L. and Park, T. K. (1975), Testing procedure


effects on dynamic soil behaviour. Journal of
Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 101, No.
GT-10, 1061-1083.

Paper No. 54