Denver Journal - 2:0113 - Malachi

Seite 1

Search

Home About Us
Contact Us

Academics

Admissions

Alumni & Friends

Giving

News & Events

Denver Journal
An Online Review of Current Biblical and Theological Studies.

Publications

Students

Volume 2 - 1999
Editor: Richard S. Hess

Hill, Andrew E. Malachi. The Anchor Bible, 25D. New York: Doubleday, 1998. $37.95 hc. xliii + 436 pp. ISBN 0-385-46892-X.
In the introduction to this recent addition to the Anchor Bible series Hill declares that his is an attempt at an
"encyclopedic approach." His desire is to present a modern supplement to the two volume work of A. von Bulmerincq (1926,
1932), which he calls "the benchmark for exegetical commentaries on the book of Malachi" (p. xi).
In many ways the author has succeeded in providing his readers with an uncommon wealth of detail. Some of the
valuable features offered by Hull include a glossary of theological, literary, and grammatical terms (pp. xxv-xxxi) and a set of
fourteen pertinent photographs and diagrams. The introductory material probes areas not commonly dealt with in
commentaries. For example, there is a lengthy discussion on the status of each of the ancient versions and their similarities
and differences (pp. 3-10), a listing of the quotes of and allusions to Malachi in the New Testament (pp. 84-88), and an
interesting description of the liturgical use of this prophetic book within Judaism and different traditions within Christianity
(pp. 88-91). The volume closes with four appendices (pp. 391-414): von Bulmerincqs Categories for Dating Malachi (a
listing of scholarly positions), Typological Analysis of the Postexilic Prophets, Intertextuality in the Book of Malachi, and
Vocabulary Richness in the Book of Malachi.
Another remarkable item in this work is Hills forthright declaration of his theological convictions and its impact on his
textual work (The author teaches at Wheaton College, a well-known evangelical liberal arts institution of higher learning.):
By conviction I accede to the classification "conservative" (or "evangelical") biblical scholar By "conservative," I
mean that approach to the study of the biblical documents that recognizes among other things the tradition of the
divine origin of the Scriptures (), a decided reluctance to emend the Masoretic Text (MT) apart from convincing
evidence to the contrary (and hence a tendency to downplay speculation concerning the multiple redactional levels
detected in the MT), and a preference for substantiating rather than reconstructing biblical history (pp. xii-xiii).
Quoting B.S. Childs, he later adds:
Rather, I prefer to understand the Bible as normative Scripture that "no longer functions for the community of faith as a
free-floating metaphor, but as the divine imperative and promise to a historically conditioned people of God whose
legacy the Christian confesses to share." (p. 23)
He utilizes, therefore, what he would label a "believing criticism," which is open to appropriating critical tools yet
without compromising an orthodox appreciation of the Bible and that also has as its primary aim to ascertain the authorial
intent of the text. Thus, while championing the integrity and authenticity of this prophetic book, he can hold as well that the
superscription (1:1) and the closing lines (3:22-24; Eng 4:4-6) are secondary additions. His commitment to the canon also
encourages him to read passages within the context of the entire Bible, though especially within the Haggai-ZechariahMalachi corpus. Hills evangelical convictions, however, do not lead him to be insensitive to Jewish concerns, which would
read Malachi against a different theological and communal backdrop. For instance, in addition to the description of the
Jewish liturgical usage mentioned above, throughout he cites Scripture as OT/HB (Old Testament/Hebrew Bible) and is
aware of discussions within the rabbinic literature.
This commentary follows the usual format of the series: a new translation of a passage, followed in turn by
introductory observations (often of a form critical sort), technical textual notes, and more synthetic comments. Hills
research has been extensive. Sometimes, however, the amount of detail motivated by his passion to be comprehensive can
be intrusive and confusing, as the readers attention gets diverted by long parenthetical lists of passages or scholarly views.
Sustained argumentation can be disrupted, and a sense of continuity lost. The fact that the format does not put the verse
headings in bold also hinders quick reference use of this detailed volume.
Besides the issue of formatting, I would add two more quibbles. First, a more extensive interaction with recent
sociological approaches (such as that of Hoglund) to the Postexilic period would have enriched the discussion of the
historical setting (pp. 51-76). His is not too very different from more classical approaches. Second, although Hill professes
that he will follow "that type of rhetorical criticism that emphasizes both the literary architecture and artistry as well as the
human drama of the biblical literature" (p. 22), one can feel shortchanged at times by the lack of extended discussions of

http://www.denverseminary.edu/dj/articles1999/0100/0113

09.03.2007 16:39:45

Denver Journal - 2:0113 - Malachi

Seite 2

these literary features. Perhaps the format problem rears its head here again: the details block out a better grasp of the
whole.
All in all, this commentary is a gold mine of information for those who interested in studying the book of Malachi. Not all
will agree with every interpretation or with particular stances (such as his view on the dating of the book earlier than most,
pp. 77-84), but all will benefit from the labors of this scholar, who has such a deep appreciation for the message of this
prophet.
M. Daniel Carroll R.
Professor of Old Testament
Denver Seminary

Denver Journal Home

Copyright 1997-2006 Denver Seminary. 6399 South Santa Fe Drive, Littleton, CO, 80120. 303.761.2482 or 800.922.3040. info@denverseminary.edu

http://www.denverseminary.edu/dj/articles1999/0100/0113

09.03.2007 16:39:45