# The mouse and the elephant

Ibrahim Amellal
7 octobre 2016

1

“A mouse sitted on an elephant whose walking, look how we
shake the ground”
Famous joke

2

1

Absract

In the last article, we claimed that light was only a wave and said that the
wave-particle duality was irrelevant for the light. And about the electron ?
Probably, it’s relevant for the electron.

2

Particle’s and wave’s behaviour

What we call by a particle behaviour and what we wave behaviour ?
For the particle, like a ball at our scale, you shoot and their “dynamic”
are just described by gravitational forces and other “newton mechanics law”.
For the wave, it’s a energy transfert, invisible and probably not transported
by material.

3

What gravitation ?

The gravitation is a transfert of attractives energies from particles to
other by waves. And how it works ? We know that gravitation decreases by
1
implies that his diffusion is spherical.
r2
So take some examples :
- Up and down energy : You shake by up and down movements like for
the electromagnetic waves as we seen precedently and the energy move in a
orthogonal direction.
- Forward and behind energy : Like the spring, you pull and push and the
wave moves in the same direction.
That’s linear movements. For objects, we have a good example with the
heart.
He increases his volume making a compression on the blood and relaxing
and the energy is transfered to the blood whose can move through the veins
and blood vessels.
For our particle and gravity it’s an opposite sense, thus the particle
or asubparticle inside or a membrane decreases and return to his position.
Depression by depression (in our depression the volume decreases, so the
energy of the system become weaker by the compression of the particle,
thus close to the electron we have a weak density of the energy, so we have
a gradient of energy and the reste of the energy “plug” and like Heat, we
have a diffusion and the a “attraction” of the other particles and wave.

3

4

And for the elecromagnetic force ?

In a attractive phenomen, it’s probably the same, in a repulsion, it’s
probably like the heart.
So by the Planck constant we know that at each pulsion we diffuse :
±h = 6, 626.10−34 kg.m2 /s = ±h = 6, 626.10−34 J.s
As we the quanta “push” a “charge on a surface by second” of 6, 626.10−34 kg.m2 /s.
So I haven’t made similar experiences for gravity, I have just paper, pens
and an old Mabcook Pro, but very probably, we have a similar law.
And what this new view on the physics change ? Maybe the experience
of Galileo become false.

5

“If the experience doesn’t match with theory, change the results
of experience”
Albert Einstein
“E pur si muove”
Galileo

A body with gravitation seem diffuses a “depression of energy density”
dissiped in 1/r2 , so the energy whose attract the other body is ... an integral
of surface. For example take the value of Planck constant with a frequency
of one Hertz, we have just 6, 626.10−34 J radiated but the body have a mass
and a surface.
Unlike in our experience of life suggests, two objects of the same mass
but with different area will not fall at the same speed ? And guess whose
came in first ? The most expanded ... Really ? Probably yes ...
Take one mass of 1 kg with a surface of the 10cm2 and other of one kg
distribued on 1m2 , the second masse will absorb hundred times more than
the first. On Earth, due to the air, the force created by the resistance of the
air push in the anti-gravitational direction but in the full-empty environnement, it will be the opposite. Think about a vehicle riding with solar energy,
with a greater surface, he’ll be able to absorb more energy.
And for the different mass with the same surface ? They will absorb the
same energy, but they displace different mass, like a drone flying with solar

4

energy but transporting fret ...
Galileo had probably false but he couldn’t know it, our sensors aren’t
enough performant to see it.

6

Intern mass

So as we seen, the particle could create a lot of depressive quantas. The
mass at a static world could be defined by the sum of total energy diffused
by particles and by second over a surface or in other way the sum of his
quantas, and a particular features here, the superposition is one sense, from
infinity to the body. We know by Einstein and we will see after that the
“intern mass” decreases with the speed.
With the constant of Planck, we can retrieve the famous relation bewteen
mass and energy : E = mc2 .

5