Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Discriminati
on in the
corporate
world.
PRESENTED BY:-
PRATIK GANDHI
SAGAR AGRAWAL
SAGAR A. AGRAWAL
The beginning of the 21st century brought with it a spate of problems for the world's largest
retailer Wal-Mart. The company found itself facing one of the biggest lawsuits ever in the history
of the US. Wal-Mart was charged with discrimination against its female employees in
compensation, promotions and job assignments in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (Title VII) . The plaintiffs alleged that Wal-Mart mistreated women in various ways: they
earned much less than their male counterparts even when they had more experience than men or
performed better than them. In June 2001, a former Wal-Mart employee, Betty Dukes (Dukes),
had filed a case accusing the company of 'sex discrimination in promotions, training and pay.
Many more employees joined Dukes, and by May 2003, the case had taken the shape of a class
action suit after the plaintiffs asked a Federal Judge to allow the case to proceed on behalf of
more than 1.5 million women. Wal-Mart had for long been accused of not treating its female
employees in a socially responsible manner. A study of Wal-Mart's own employee data (conducted
by some experts hired by the plaintiffs) revealed that women had been discriminated against in
many instances. Even the company's internal memos revealed that Wal-Mart was far behind its
competitors in promoting women at the workplace.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
GENDER DISCRIMINATION
Disparate impact is a more complex concept. It regards company policies or practices that exclude
persons of one gender from a job or from promotions although the policy or practice was not
designed to do so. There is a disparate impact on one gender. An example is the policy of many
fire departments that had strength requirements for hiring firefighter that far exceeded the strength
needed by an individual to work effectively as a firefighter. Such excessive strength requirements
had a disparate impact on women, many of whom had enough strength to be a good firefighter, but
not enough strength to meet the department's requirement.
Discrimination at work can come from either the employee of from the colleague side.
Discrimination by colleagues can happen to new employees. They may face sarcastic stares or
constant digs made at them by their colleagues during initial weeks. However, if it persists for a
long time, it can affect not only the employee but also the employer. The effect on the employee
can be huge or meager but the impact on organization remains for a longer time. An employee
who is being discriminated witnesses non cooperation from peers and negative feedbacks form
subordinates. Discrimination leads to psychological and emotional disturbance, resulting in
demoralization and descend in performance standards. It brings down the overall performance, and
fuels more discrimination, which in turn increases the number of gaps in one's work further.
Discrimination at workplace also affects the society. The socio-economic inequalities get widened
and social cohesion and solidarity are eroded. It results in wastage of human talent and resources.
The main indicator which indicates that gender discrimination has occurred in the hiring process
involves the qualifications of the job applicants. While a slight difference in qualifications
between a female and a male candidate does not automatically indicate gender bias (if a lesser
qualified male candidate is hired instead of a female candidate, that is), a drastic difference in
qualifications has almost always been upheld by the courts as a sure sign of gender discrimination.
For example, if a male who dropped out of high school without receiving a diploma is hired in an
administrative position over a female who had obtained her master's degree, then it is likely bias
was a factor.
• An employer may not hire, promote or wrongfully terminate an employee based on his or
her gender
• Employers pay unequally based on gender
• One is refused credit or is offered unequal loan terms based on one’s gender
• Employers in the past paid female workers substantially less than their male workers were
making in the same job.
• Some employers fired female employees as soon as the employees became pregnant, even
though these employees could have continued to perform their job duties.
Despite the progress that individual countries and companies have made in addressing gender
inequality and discrimination, there is still much to be done to achieve true equality in public
institutions and in the corporate executive suite. Glass Ceiling is yet another form of
discrimination towards women, which exists in the corporate hierarchy. Glass ceiling has been
used as a metaphor for twenty years now to describe the apparently invisible barriers that prevent
more than a few women from reaching the top levels of management. Compared to formal barriers
to career advancement such as education, the glass ceiling refers to less tangible hindrances —
frequently anchored in culture, society and psychological factors — that impede women’s
advancement to upper management or other senior positions. One of the main reasons cited for the
existence of a glass ceiling was that women did not have the required experience and skills to
reach the top management. They were restricted to clerical and other support services jobs. The
reason seemed to be true, as in the late 1970s and early 1980s, very few women had proper college
education and fewer had management degrees.
Conclusion
So there is a potential to address and eradicate all the problems. It is also proven that women have
been contributing to the economic development of many countries but there lacks a realization and
all their work go invisible. But, for a few super success stories like Kiran Mazundar Shaw of
Biocon, Chanda Kochar, the incumbent MD & CEO of ICICI Bank, Mallika Srinivasan of
Tractor And Farm Equipments (TAFE), Amrita Patel of National Dairy Development Board
(NDDB), Vinita Bali of Britannia Industries, Kalpana Chawla, Sunita Williams of NASA,
President Pratibha Patil, Sonia Gandhi, Chairperson of UPA, Mamata Banerjee-MP,
Jayalalitha (TN) from Indian Politics, Shobaa De, Arundhati Roy, Priety Zinta from IPL very
few have achieved limelight they deserve. Although few women have been striving hard for
women’s emancipation and overall growth along with several other causes like Medha Patkar of
the Narmada Bachchao Andolan, Mother Theresa-the Nobel Laurete, most of the contribution
goes unnoticed. There should be a framework, an action plan to uplift women from the oppression
and give them independence from gender discrimination.