You are on page 1of 26

Syllabus in

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW I
Atty. V. Paul Le. Montejo

STRUCTURE AND POWERS OF GOVERNMENT
I. IN GENERAL
A. Political Law Defined
Case - MACARIOLA VS. ASUNCION 114 SCRA 77 (1982)
B. Constitutional Law Defined
C. Constitution Defined
Types/Kinds of Constitution
II. BACKGROUND OF THE PRESENT CONSTITUTION
A. The February 1986 Revolution and the Proclamation of the Provisional
Constitution.
Proclamation No. 1 - Feb. 25, 1986 (Prov. Govt.)
Proclamation No. 3 - March 25, 1986 (Prov. Const.)
Cases - LAWYERS LEAGUE VS. AQUINO May 22, 1986
IN RE: BERMUDEZ 145 SCRA 160 (1986)
LETTER OF ASSOCIATE JUSTICE PUNO
210 SCRA 589 (1992)
B. Adoption and Effectivity of the Present Constitution.
Article V of the Provisional Constitution
Sec. 27, Art. XVIII of the 1987 Constitution
Proclamation No. 58 - Feb. 11, 1987
Case - DE LEON VS. ESGUERRA 153 SCRA 602 (1987)
Compare with Effectivity of Statutes
Case - TAÑADA VS. TUVERA 136 SCRA 27 (1985)
& 146 SCRA 446 (1986)
Law - E.O. 200 - June 18, 1987 Amending Art. 2 of the Civil Code
III. JUDICIAL ELABORATION OF THE CONSTITUTION
A. Construction - MANILA PRINCE HOTEL VS. GSIS 267 SCRA 408 (1997)
DOMINO VS. COMELEC 310 SCRA 546 (1999)
PAMATONG VS. COMELEC 427 SCRA 96 (2004)
DATU MICHAEL ABAS KIDA V. SENATE (AND COMPANION
CASES) 659 SCRA 270 (2011) and 667 SCRA 270 (2012)
CHAVEZ VS. JBC 696 SCRA 496 (2013)
B. Theory of Judicial Review
Separation of Powers
Case – ANGARA VS. ELECTORAL COMMISSION 63 PHIL 139 (1936)
METROBANK VS. TOBIAS 664 SCRA 165 (2012)
RE: COA OPINION 678 SCRA 1 (2012)
CSC VS. RAMONEDA-PITA 696 SCRA 155 (2013)
GARCIA VS. DRILON 699 SCRA 352 (2013)
HEIRS OF MALABANAN VS. REPUBLIC 704 SCRA 561 (13)
Presumption of Constitutionality

Case – PEREZ VS. PEOPLE 544 SCRA 532 (2008)
ANNOTATION – JUDICIAL REVIEW – 583 SCRA 142 (2009)
C. Conditions for the Exercise of Judicial Review
Cases - HACIENDA LUISITA VS. PARC 653 SCRA 154 (2011)
660 SCRA 525 (2011)
DELA LLANA VS. CHAIRPERSON 665 SCRA176 (2012)
CANDARI VS. DONASCO 666 SCRA 279 (2012)
GALICTO VS. AQUINO 667 SCRA 255 (2012)
LAMP VS. SEC OF DBM 670 SCRA 373 (2012)
FUNA VS. VILLAR 670 SCRA 570 (2012)
CAPALLA VS. VILLAR 673 SCRA 1 (2012)
CHAVEZ VS. JBC 676 SCRA 579 (2012)
IDEALS VS. PSALM 682 SCRA 602 (2012)
ADVOCATES FOR TRUTH VS. BANGKO SENTRAL
688 SCRA 530 (2013)
FUNA VS. AGRA 691 SCRA 196 (2013)
BELGICA VS. OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 (2013)
MANILA MEMORIAL VS. DSWD 711 SCRA 302 (2013)
FUNA VS. MANILA ECON OFFICE 715 SCRA 247 (2015)
DISINI VS. SOJ 716 SCRA 237 (2014)
IMBANG VS. OCHOA 721 SCRA 146 (2014)
CORPUZ VS. PEOPLE 724 SCRA 1 (2014)
ARAULLO VS. AQUINO III 728 SCRA 1 (2014)
KALIPUNAN VS. ROBREDO 730 SCRA 322 (2014)
ANNOTATION ON LOCUS STANDI – 314 SCRA 641
- 548 SCRA 519
D. Functions of Judicial Review: Checking, Legitimating and Symbolic
Cases - JAVIER VS. COMELEC 144 SCRA 194 (1986)
ABS-CBN VS. COMELEC 323 SCRA 811 (2000)
CENTRAL BANK VS. BSP 446 SCRA 229 (2004)
E. All Courts Can Exercise Judicial Review
Cases - YNOT VS. IAC 148 SCRA 659 (1987)
BROKENSHIRE VS. MINISTER 182 SCRA 5 (1990)
ONGSUCO VS. MALONES 604 SCRA 499 (2009)
F. Effects of Declaration of Unconstitutionality
Law - Article 7, New Civil Code of the Philippines
Cases - SERRANO DE AGBAYANI VS. PNB 38 SCRA 429 (1971)
FLORES VS. DRILON 223 SCRA 568 (1993)
ALDOVINO VS. ALUNAN III 230 SCRA 825 (1994)
Operative Fact Doctrine
Cases – HACIENDA LUISITA VS. PARC 660 SCRA 525 (2011)
COCOFED VS. REPUBLIC 663 SCRA 514 (2012)
CIR VS. SAN ROQUE 707 SCRA 66 (2013)
BELGICA VS. OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 (2013)
ARAULLO VS. AQUINO III 728 SCRA 1 (2014)
G. Political Question vs. Justiciable Question
Cases - OPOSA VS. FACTORAN 224 SCRA 792 (1993)
VELARDE VS. SJS 428 SCRA 283 (2004)
COMELEC VS. CRUZ 605 SCRA 167 (2009)
VINUYA VS. ROMULO 619 SCRA 533 (2010)
IDEALS VS. PSALM 682 SCRA 602 (2012)

Page 2 - Constitutional Law 1 - Syllabus

June 11. Art.P. the Subsoil. 257 SCRA 795 (1996). VI.Constitutional Law 1 . 1. People 1. Art. COMELEC 424 SCRA 277 (2004) GO. Inhabitants . Secs. & 337 SCRA 558 (2000) Case – TECSON VS. ROMULO 578 SCRA 438 (2009) 1. The Philippine Archipelago a. Art. 4. 1978 U. Sec. December 31. Art. the Insular Shelves and Other Submarine Areas. Law . Who are Citizens Sec.D. IV. 3046 . 232 SCRA 800 (1994).IV. The Territorial Sea.Secs. Sec.Syllabus . Lawyer’s Review. Art. XIII b. Pacifico Castro. 1987 Constitution Case – NICOLAS VS. 4. III Case . 1982 C. THE PHILIPPINES AS A STATE A.A.Preamble.QUA CHEE GAN VS. Methods of Determining Baselines R. II. 1 & 4. Electors . 9522 – March 10. Page 4. HRET 656 SCRA 17 (2011) b. 8.Elements Case .N. III c. State Defined .April 30. the Sea Bed. 1968 R. Art.ANNOTATIONS ON CITIZENSHIP 197 SCRA 928 (1991). 7. 5446 . 1978 (Kalayaan Islands) “Scarborough Shoal” Article: Kalayaan Islands by: Amb. Territory . III of the Treaty of Paris Treaty of Washington between Spain and US (11-7-1900) Treaty between US and Great Britain (1-2-1930) b. Other Territories Over which the Philippines has Sovereignty or Jurisdiction. Art.D. 1961 R. Art. SR. 1987 Constitution Suggested Readings . Citizens . Election of Philippine Citizenship Page 3 .A.P. Citizenship a. VII. No.COLLECTOR VS.The Archipelago Concept Article 1.A. VS. DEPORTATION BOARD 9 SCRA 27 (1963) Sec. 2009 2. 15 & 16.June 17. Different Meaning of the Word “People” under the Constitution a. Sec. RAMOS 598 SCRA 266 (2009) GONZALES VS. CAMPOS RUEDA 42 SCRA 23 (1971) B. Art.June 11.Sec. PENNISI 614 SCRA 292 (2010) VILANDO VS.Sept. Sec. Treaty Limits Art. 25. Convention on the Law of the Sea . II. 2. Two Hundred-Mile Exclusive Economic Zone Laws . 1596 . 1599 . 1. XVIII 2. 2. 1999 3.

BATUIGAS 706 SCRA 746 (2013) 3. COMELEC 559 SCRA 698 (2008) JACOT VS. CIVIL REGISTER 423 SCRA 420 (2004) REPUBLIC VS. Art. COMELEC 696 SCRA 420 700 SCRA 367 (2013) Page 4 . ACT NO. VIII. 8 Case – KILOSBAYAN VS. Ombudsman and Deputies .IN RE: CHING 316 SCRA 1 (1999) REPUBLIC VS.A. DAL 572 SCRA 295 (2008) DE GUZMAN VS. REPUBLIC 729 SCRA 138 (2014) 1. 1 (1) Art.Syllabus . XIII. 473 . 2. Sec. 2001 Case – REPUBLIC VS. 1987 Constitution Residency Requirement Reduced to 5 years 2. 17 (2) d. Sec. Art. 9225 . Who are qualified to be Naturalized Note Effect of R.COMM.A. V. ONG 673 SCRA 485 (2012)  R. 530 Case – REPUBLIC VS.Art. DATUMANONG 523 SCRA 108 (2007) LOPEZ VS. Justices of the Supreme Court and Lower Collegiate Courts . Vice President . COMELEC 678 SCRA 267 (2012) MAQUILING VS. Sec.Sec. 63 R. Secs. Procedure 4. 2001 COMM. Loss and Reacquisition of Citizenship Sec. 8 6.JUNE 17.Art.Age of Majority Note Effect on Language Requirement Art.Law. 3 & 6 4. 3 3. VII. LIM 419 SCRA 123 (2004) MA VS. 1987 Constitution Who must be Natural-Born 1.JUNE 7. Commission on Human Rights Members Art. VII. 9139 June 8. 1 (1) Art. 625 . IV. Sec 2 2.August 29. 6.COMM. President . 3. 1 (1) 7. 15. Denaturalization Case – CO VS. IX-B. 1939 Case – GO VS. ACT NO. Sec. R. Sec. ERMITA 526 SCRA 353 (2007) 5. Sec.Constitutional Law 1 .Art. 9139 June 8. HRET 656 SCRA 17 (2011) REPUBLIC VS. Declaration of Intention 3. 20 8. Members of Congress . COMELEC 590 SCRA 149 (09) SOBEJANA-CONDON VS. VI. Natural-Born Citizens ANNOTATION 357 SCRA 580 Sec. Constitutional Commission Members Art.A.Art. ACT NO. Sec. 1941 Cases .A. 6809 . LI CHING CHUNG 694 SCRA 249 (2013) 5. XII.A. IX-D. IX-C. 1987 Constitution Law . Central Monetary Authority Members Art. SAGUN 666 SCRA 321 (2012) c. 2003 Case – AASJS VS. FERNANDEZ 625 SCRA 566 (2010) VILANDO VS. Sec. XIV. Sec.Art. Naturalized Citizens Laws – R. When Decision is Executory . XI.

8171 October 23. CA 500 SCRA 9 (2006) 4. 1995 Cases . Code of 1991 Case – MERCADO VS. HRET 357 SCRA 545 (2001) ANGAT VS. DELA ROSA 232 SCRA 785 (1994) GUY VS. IGNACIO 622 SCRA 678 (2010) 2. Art. Consent to be Sued Page 5 .Constitutional Law 1 . Loss of Citizenship 1. 5. TEVES 682 SCRA 397 (2012) DOH VS. Art. COMELEC 678 SCRA 267 (2012) MAQUILING VS. PHIL PHARMA 691 SCRA 421 (2013) c. MANZANO 307 SCRA 630 (1999) Annotation – ALLEGIANCE OF FORMER FILIPINO CITIZEN – 573 SCRA 733 (2008) D. TESDA 591 SCRA 83 (2009) HEIRS OF MATEO PIDACAN VS. Sovereign Immunity a. COMELEC 337 SCRA 543 (2000) BENGZON III VS. DEFENSOR-SANTIAGO 169 SCRA 364 (1989) AZNAR VS. Reacquisition or Repatriation Law – R.A. 1987 Constitution Case . RAMOS 644 SCRA 36 (2011) CHINA NATIONAL VS. 3. XVI. REPUBLIC 314 SCRA 438 (1999) ALTERAJOS VS. Express Renunciation or Expatriation Cases . DELA ROSA 232 SCRA 785 (1994) VALLES VS.a. 40 (d).REPUBLIC VS. COMELEC 185 SCRA 703 (1990) VILANDO VS. IV. Local Govt.REPUBLIC VS. Basis Sec. VILLASOR 54 SCRA 83 (1973) ANNOTATION – IMMUNITY OF GOVERNMENT AGENCY 591 SCRA 104 (2009) b. COMELEC 441 SCRA 655 (2004) TABASA VS.PROFESSIONAL VIDEO VS.REPUBLIC VS. Sovereignty 1. Naturalization in a Foreign Country Cases . 1987 Constitution Sec. ATO 629 SCRA 451 (2010) ATO VS. HRET 656 SCRA 17 (2011) SOBEJANA-CONDON VS.Syllabus . Dual Allegiance Sec. SANTAMARIA 665 SCRA 189 (2012) HEIRS OF GAMBOA VS. COMELEC 696 SCRA 420 700 SCRA 367 (2013) b. When is a Suit against the State Cases .YU VS.

Implied Consent a.How Consent is Given Cases . Liability Quasi-Delict committed by Special Agent Law – Art. SAN DIEGO 31 SCRA 616 (1970) b. NLRC 262 SCRA 39 (1996) . CIR 81 SCRA 314 (1978) c.C. Enters Into Business Contracts Cases – PTA VS. NLRC 227 SCRA 693 (1993) 1. Inequitable to Claim Immunity Case – EPG CONSTRUCTION VS.A.REPUBLIC VS. JUDGE 195 SCRA 692 (1991) MUNICIPALITY OF HAGONOY VS. DUMDUM 616 SCRA 1 (2010) Page 6 . C. Govt. Execution Cases .FROILAN VS. Under Act No. GOVT 34 PHIL 311 (1916) MUNICIPALITY VS. UNIMEX 518 SCRA 19 (2007) c. PGDEI 668 SCRA 406 b.DEPT. Express Consent a. Under a Charter Case . Govt. Open to Counterclaim Case .PNB VS. HIDALGO 477 SCRA 32 (2005) 4. 1415 Case . Initiates a Complaint. PAN ORIENTAL 95 PHIL 905 (1950) REPUBLIC VS. Scope of Consent a. 2180. 3083 Case . SANDIGANBAYAN 484 SCRA 119 (2006) 3. 3038. Incorporation of Govt. Owned and/or Controlled Corporations (GOCCs) Case – NHA VS.Constitutional Law 1 . Suability vs. HEIRS OF GUIVELONDO 404 SCRA 389 (2003) 2. SINGSON 54 SCRA 282 (1973) b.Syllabus .SAYSON VS. OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS VS. NLRC 263 SCRA 290 REPUBLIC VS.COMMISSIONER VS. 327 & P. VIGILAR 354 SCRA 566 (2001) REPUBLIC VS.VETERANS MANPOWER VS.A.D. Money Claims Arising From Contract Laws . CA 214 SCRA 286 (1992) DA VS. New Civil Code Cases – MERRIT VS.

VS. COMELEC 618 SCRA 32 (2010) LOKIN. Secs. Senate Art. COMELEC 705 SCRA 340 (2013) ABANG LINGKOD VS.SEMA VS. COMELEC 609 SCRA 636 (2009) TALAGA VS. House of Representative Art. “Government” in General . COMELEC 606 SCRA 258 (2009) 613 SCRA 385 (2010) MITRA VS. LEGISLATIVE DEPARTMENT (CONGRESS) 1. COMELEC 586 SCRA 210 (2009) ABAYON VS. Secs. COMELEC 729 SCRA 299 (2014) Law . JR. IX. INC. 2 (1). XVIII. Synchronized terms of office Art.A. Qualifications. HRET 622 SCRA 593 (2010) LAYUG VS. and Term of Office a. COMELEC 683 SCRA 602 (2012) QUINTO VS. Sec. 1995 Cases – BANAT VS. VI. 7941 March 3.ANNOTATION – DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY 323 SCRA 699 E.Sec. COMELEC 708 SCRA 133 (13) Annotation – CANCELLATION OF ACCREDITATION 706 SCRA 298 c.A. C. VI. Administrative Code of 1987 V. COMELEC 667 SCRA 135 (2012) ATONG PAGLAUM. COMELEC 670 SCRA 664 (2012) ALDOVINO VS. Secs.Constitutional Law 1 . COMELEC 558 SCRA 700 (2008) ALDABA VS.Defined 2. ERMITA 612 SCRA 131 (2009) AQUINO III VS. COMELEC 703 SCRA 165 ANAD VS. COMELEC 611 SCRA 137 (2009 615 SCRA 564 (2010) NAVARRO VS. Government 1. COMELEC 622 SCRA 749 (2010) ASISTIO VS.SABILI VS. 7 Fair Elections Act – R. “Government of the Philippines” . Composition. VS COMELEC 621 SCRA 285 (2010) 674 SCRA 538 (2012) AMORES VS. 2-4 b.PARTY LIST SYSTEM ACT R. COMELEC 617 SCRA 623 (2010) NAVAL VS. XVIII. 6-8 Art. HRET 612 SCRA 375 (2010) ANG LADLAD VS. Secs. 5-6 Art. COMELEC 694 SCRA 477 (2013) COCOFED VS.Defined Law . AGUIRRE 619 518 (2010) Annotation – RESIDENCY 691 SCRA 385 (2013) Apportionment / Districts Cases .Syllabus . 1-2 Page 7 . 9006) Cases . THE STRUCTURE AND POWERS OF THE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT A.

Dec. Election of Officers Art. Sec. JALOSJOS 324 SCRA 689 (2000) TRILLANES VS. VI. ACT NO 6645. Sec. ACT NO. 17 Case . PIMENTEL 556 SCRA 471 (2008) c. XI. GORDON 639 SCRA 703 (2011) (2) Other prohibitions Art. 7166 Case – TOLENTINO VS. 13 Case .JIMENEZ VS.Syllabus . 1987 REP. VI. Sec.ANNOTATION ON TERM LIMITATION 582 SCRA 774 (09) Case . Sec.LIBAN VS. 11 Law . MATHAY 18 SCRA 300 (1966) LIGOT VS. Duty to disclose Art. COMELEC 609 SCRA 636 (2009) ABUNDO VS. OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 (2013) Art. Sec. 20 4. Regular election Art. Internal Government of Congress a. Privileges. Salaries Art.Constitutional Law 1 . Disqualifications (1) Incompatible and Forbidden Offices Id. MATHAY 56 SCRA 823 (1974) b. Sec. 11 Case – PEOPLE VS. Election a.. 9 Art. 11 Cases . VI. C. PENDATUN 109 PHIL 863 (1960) d. Sec. and Disqualifications a. VI. Salaries. VI. XI.AVELINO VS.PHILCONSA VS. 8 b. Quorum Id. 16 (2) Case . GORDON 593 SCRA 68 (2009) LIBAN VS. COMELEC 729 SCRA 299 (2014) 2. Speech and Debate Clause Art. 17 (1949) Page 8 .. Sec. CUENCO 83 PHIL. DE GUZMAN 113 SCRA 31 (1982) BELGICA VS. Sec. VI.PUYAT VS. Sec 12 Id. Freedom from arrest Art. 16 (1) Case – SANTIAGO VS. XVIII. COMELEC 420 SCRA 438 (2004) 3. Sec.ALDOVINO VS. 28. Sec. Special election Art. VI. GUINGONA 298 SCRA 756 (1998) b.16 e. 10 Art. VI. Sec. Sec. Sec 17 Art. CABANGBANG 17 SCRA 876 (1966) OSMEÑA VS. 14 Case . IX.REP. COMELEC 688 SCRA 149 (2013) NAVAL VS.

Sec 21 Case – ARROYO VS. 863 (1960) (suspension for 15 months) SANTIAGO VS. VILLEGAS 56 SCRA 714 (1974) FIELD VS.ASTORGA VS.UNITED STATES VS. 16 (3) Id. HR COMMITTEES 575 SCRA 170 (2008) DELA PAZ VS. Sec. PONS 34 PHIL.”) (5) Congressional Record Art. 27 (1) (c) Yeas and nays on the repassing of a bill vetoed by the President (d) Yeas and nays on any question at the request of 1/5 of members present (Art. 16 (4). Rules of proceedings Id. Journal and Congressional Records Art. PENDATUN 109 PHIL. PURISIMA 562 SCRA 251 (08) (2) Probative value of the journal Case . 729 (1916) (3) Matters required to be entered in the Journal (a) Yeas and nays on third and final reading of a bill Art. par. Sessions (1) Regular sessions Art.Constitutional Law 1 . 36 L. Discipline of members Id. 294 (1891) (it is not competent for the appellants to show from the journals that the enrolled bill contained a section that does not appear in the enrolled act in the custody of the State Dept. VI. VI. 26 (2) (b) Veto message of the President Art. Sec. Sec. VI. Sec. Sec.ARROYO VS. Sec. 16 (5) Page 9 . Enrolled Bill Theory Cases . QUEZON 46 PHIL. DE VENECIA 277 SCRA 268 (1997) FARIÑAS VS.c.. 2 5. 16 (4) (1) The Enrolled Bill Theory Cases . VI. SANDIGANBAYAN 356 SCRA 636 (2001) e. Sec. VI. Sec.ALEJANDRINO VS. 83 (1924) OSMEÑA VS. EXECUTIVE 417 SCRA 503 (2003) ABAKADA VS.Syllabus . SENATE COMMITTEE 579 SCRA 521 (2009) d.. ED.. 16 (3) Cases . CLARK. Sec. DE VENECIA 277 SCRA258 (1997) GARCILLANO VS.. 15 Id. 16 [4]) (e) Summary of Proceedings (4) Journal Entry Rule v.

CUENCO. 10-11 Art. Sec. VI. 201 SCRA 792 (1991) d. Independence of the Electoral Tribunals Case . VII. HRET 393 SCRA 231 (2002) b. XVII. HRET 283 SCRA 520 (1997) GARCIA VS. VI.BONDOC VS. VII. 15 Art.JURISDICTION 692 SCRA 717 a. CRUZ AND FELICIANO TO BE RELIEVED AS MEMBERS OF THE HRET. COMELEC 674 SCRA 530 (2012) ATONG PAGLAUM VS. 166 SCRA 651 (1988) PIMENTEL VS..ANGARA VS. COMELEC 708 SCRA 188 (2013) Annotation . HRET 610 SCRA 733 (2010) Page 10 . 17 and 19 Cases – BARBERS VS. COMELEC 667 SCRA 135 (2012) JALOSJOS VS. sec. INOCENTES 16 SCRA 379 (1966) (2) Special sessions Id. Powers Cases . 103 PHIL. Sec. COMELEC 460 SCRA 569 (2009) FERNANDEZ VS. COMELEC 699 SCRA 522 (2013) 708 SCRA 197 (2013) TANADA VS. Par.Syllabus . Nature of Function Case. 4 (Choosing the President) Id. VII. 1(1) (Amending the Constitution) (b) Voting jointly Art. RESOLUTION DATED MARCH 19. HRET 312 SCRA 353 (1999) e. VII. 23(1) (Declaring a state of war) Art. 18 par. Judicial Review of decisions of Electoral Tribunals Case . sec.Constitutional Law 1 . 1991 c. COMELEC 603 SCRA 692 (2009) 616 SCRA 443 (2010) ABAYON VS. Sec. Sec. 3 (3) Joint sessions (a) Voting separately Art. COMELEC 694 SCRA 477 (13) REYES VS. HRET 612 SCRA 375 (2009) LAYUG VS. HRET 608 SCRA 733 (2009) MENDOZA VS. Secs.LIBANAN VS. Sec. SET.TAÑADA VS.. 9 (Confirming the nomination of a Vice-President) Art. Secs. Sec.Case – GUEVARA VS. Electoral Tribunal Art. 11. 18 (to revoke or extend martial law or suspension of privilege of habeas corpus) 6. PINEDA. 4 (Determining the President’s temporary disability) Id. ELECTORAL COMMISSION 63 PHIL. 1051(1957) ABBAS VS. Composition Cases. 139 (1946) REQUEST OF JUSTICES MELENCIO HERRERA.MARTINEZ VS.

CIREVENUE 602 SCRA 159(2009) GUTIERREZ VS. Sec. 4(3) Art. 1 Case – CITY OF DAVAO VS. Secs. Sec. SOJ 716 SCRA 237 Exception to Non-Delegation Doctrine Delegation to the President Art. HRET 614 SCRA 793 (2010) VILANDO VS.. HYPERMIX 664 SCRA 666 (2012) VIVAS VS. 29 Cases – NAZARETH VS. VI. 23(2) & Sec.Constitutional Law 1 . III (Bill of Rights) Art. HRET 393 SCRA 231 (2002) 8. OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 (2013) ARAULLO VS. XIV. DBM 616 SCRA 1 (2010) COCOFED VS. Secs.SANDOVAL VS. VI. ERMITA 583 SCRA 428 (2009) FORT BONIFACIO VS. HRET 656 SCRA 17 (2011) 7.. 18 and 19 Cases . General plenary powers Art. Sec. REPUBLIC 663 SCRA 514 (2012) COMM OF CUSTOMS VS. GONZALES 214 SCRA 789 (1991) AND 219 SCRA 326 (1993) PIMENTEL VS. Limitations on the legislative power (1) Substantive limitations (a) Express substantive limitations Art. 25 and 28 Art. MONTEMAYOR 629 SCRA 178 (2010) 1. OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 (2013) DISINI VS. 28 (2) Delegation to the people Art. VI. MONETARY BOARD OF BSP 703 SCRA 290 (2013) BELGICA VS. Sec. Commission on Appointments Art. Sec. VI. VILLAR 689 SCRA 385 (2013) BELGICA VS. Sec. Powers of Congress A. RTC – 467 SCRA 280 (2005) 1.GUINGONA VS. 30 Id. AQUINO III 728 SCRA 1 (2014) Id. VI.Syllabus . Prohibition against delegation of legislative power Cases – REVIEW CENTER VS. Page 11 . 31 (b) Implied substantive limitations Doctrine of Non-Delegation of Powers applicable in all branches of Government Case – FLORES VS.

SENATE COMMITTEE 541 SCRA 456 (2008) NERI VS. XVIII. COMELEC 723 SCRA 170 (2014) 2. Call special election for President and Vice President Art. VII. 10 F. Sec. VII. Act as board of canvassers for Presidential and Vice Presidential elections . SENATE COMMITTEE 549 SCRA 77 (2008) 564 SCRA 52 (2008) GARCILLANO VS. 32 Delegation to local governments Case – UMALI VS. ERMITA 488 SCRA 1 (2006) GUDANI VS. VII. Prohibition against passage of irrepealable laws (2) Procedural limitation ANNOTATION.SENATE BLUE RIBBON VS. Legislative investigations Art VI. VII. Confirm certain appointments Art.Syllabus . Sec. COMELEC 432 SCRA 269 (2004) E.The Legislative Process 669 SCRA 611 (2012) Art VI.VII. par. Concur in Treaties Art. ZAMORA 342 SCRA 449 (2000) Annotation – VISITING FORCES AGREEMENT 342 SCRA 522 Case – SUPLICO VS. 19 H. SENATE 673 SCRA 611 (2012) D. 18 G.Constitutional Law 1 . 21 Cases. Sec. 9 and Sec. VII. Art. 25. 4. 1987 Constitution Case – BAYAN VS. Secs. sec. PURISIMA 562 SCRA 251 (2008) B. Question hour Art VI. Sec. 4 Case – BRILLANTES VS. ERMITA 488 SCRA 1 (2006) C. Sec. 21 (through the Senate) CF: Sec. SENGA 498 SCRA 671 (2006) IN RE: SABIO 504 SCRA 704 (2006) STANDARD CHARTERED VS. Sec. MAJADUCON 407 SCRA 356 (2004) SENATE VS. 16 I. Sec. Sec. HR COMMITTEES 575 SCRA 170 (2008) PHILCOMSAT VS. Approve Presidential Amnesties Art.Art. 26-27 Case – ARROYO VS DE VENECIA 291 SCRA 433 (1998) ABAKADA VS. 22 Case – SENATE VS. VII. NEDA 558 SCRA 329 (2008) Page 12 . Revoke or extend suspension of privilege of habeas corpus or declaration of martial law Art.

XI. SENATE 676 SCRA 563 (2012) (1) Who are subject to impeachment Art. HR COMMITTEE ON JUSTICE 643 SCRA 198 (2011) (4) Consequence of impeachment Id. NMMP. VI. ROMULO 578 SCRA 438 (2009) J. 123 SCRA 569 (1953) TATAD VS. JUDGES ASSOCIATION VS. INC. sec. par. XI. 3(1)-(6) Case – FRANCISCO VS. sec. sec. 26(1) Cases . SECRETARY 281 SCRA 330 (1997) 282 SCRA 337 (1997) FARIÑAS VS. Power of impeachment Case – CORONA VS. XII. sec. 23 Case – DAVID VS.PHIL. the title or the text of a statute? Cases . VS.CRUZ VS. Sec.Syllabus . EXECUTIVE 417 SCRA 503 (2003) REMMAN ENT. 2 (3) Procedure for impeachment Id. 425 SCRA 44 (2003) GUTIERREZ VS. VI. 2 9. VI. COMELEC 595 SCRA 477 (2009) Which should control.NICOLAS VS. Legislative process Requirements as to bills (1) As to titles of bills Art. Power with regard to the utilization of natural resources Art. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 678 SCRA 614 (2012) 714 SCRA 611 (2014) (2) Grounds for impeachment Art. 11. sec. OCHOA 721 SCRA 146 (2014) (2) Requirements as to certain laws Origin of Bills – Case – ABAKADA VS..Constitutional Law 1 . PRBRE 715 SCRA 293 (2014) IMBANG VS. Declaration of war and delegation of emergency powers Art. COMELEC 336 SCRA 188 (2000) BANAT VS. sec. MACAPAGAL-ARROYO 489 SCRA 160 (2006) (PP 1017 . MOJICA – 452 SCRA 714 (2005) GONZALES VS. PARAS. Sec. PRADO 227 SCRA 703 (1993) DE GUZMAN VS. Be judge of the President’s physical fitness or capacity Art.Declaration of State of National Emergency) K.. 4 L. DESIERTO 356 SCRA 108 (2001) M. 2 Case – OFFICE VS. 3(7) Case – ESTRADA VS. EXECUTIVE 469 SCRA 1 (2005) Page 13 .

sec. VII. 28 Art.BRILLANTES VS. Initiative and Referendum. SOUTHWING 482 SCRA 673 (2006) b. “If any bill shall not be returned by the President within ten days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him.Constitutional Law 1 . OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 (2013) ARAULLO VS. EXECUTIVE 469 SCRA 1 (2005) c. AQUINO III 728 SCRA 1 (2014) (b) Tax laws Art. MACARAIG. sec. COMELEC 432 SCRA 269 (2004) ATITIW VS. in like manner as if he had signed it.Syllabus . 27 Compare 1935 Const. PCGG 299 SCRA 744 (1998) LUNG CENTER VS. 200. sec. XIV. JR. Act. 4(3) (4) Cases .(a) Appropriation laws Art. June 18. 136 SCRA 27 (1985) Same. 191 SCRA 452 (1990) BENGZON VS. The President’s veto power Qualified versus Absolute Veto Messaged veto versus Pocket Veto No “pocket veto” in the Philippines.GONZALES VS. DE VENECIA 291 SCRA 433 (1998) TOLENTINO VS. Rep.S.” Art. sec. unless the Congress by their adjournment prevent its return in which case it shall not be a law. VI. TUVERA. 26(2) Case . QUEZON CITY 433 SCRA 119 2004) EXECUTIVE VS. GUINGONA. 208 SCRA 133 (1992) PCA VS. Art. 1987 10. sec. ZAMORA 471 SCRA 329 (2005) BELGICA VS. Const. COMELEC 262 SCRA 492 (1996) SANTIAGO VS. 22 Art. sec. Art. Procedure for the passage of bills Art.ALVAREZ VS.YMCA vs. VI. 4. SECRETARY 235 SCRA 630 (1994) and 249 SCRA 628 (1995) ABAKADA VS. 6735. VI.. the same shall be a law. 20 Cases . secs. Effectivity of laws Civil Code. PURISIMA 562 SCRA 251 (2008) d. 7 of U. VI. COMELEC 270 SCRA 106 (1997) Page 14 . 252 SCRA 695 (1996) ARROYO VS. COMELEC 237 SCRA 279 (1994) SBMA VS. OCHOA 710 SCRA 1 (2013) Legislative Veto – ABAKADA VS. VI. No. Aug. 146 SCRA 446 (1986) Executive Order No. sec. I. DRILON. ENRIQUEZ 235 SCRA 506 (1994) BELGICA VS. What is a pocket veto? Art.TAÑADA VS. CA 298 SCRA 83 (1998) CHAVEZ VS. 2 Cases . 24-25 Cases . 1989 Cases – GARCIA VS. resolution of motion for reconsideration.

ELMA 494 SCRA 53 (2006) 517 SCRA 336 (2007) FUNA VS. VS. VS. election. EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT 1. B.B. SENATE COMMITTEE 549 SCRA 77 (2008) 564 SCRA 52 (2008) Annotation – 549 SCRA 402 / 588 SCRA 687 EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE 619 SCRA 669 (2010) c. sec. 6 Executive Privilege : Cases – AKBAYAN VS. 4 and 5 Case – SANTIAGO VS. IX. 12 Exceptions to rule prohibiting executive officials from holding additional positions: (1) Vice President as member of the Cabinet (Art. A. sec. IX. sec. VIII.Syllabus . MACAPAGAL 454 SCRA 142 (2005) ANNOTATION ON TERM LIMITATION 582 SCRA 774 (09) b. VII. DESIERTO – 353 SCRA 452 (2001) 356 SCRA 108 (2001) ANNOTATION – SUCCESSION OF MACAPAGAL-ARROYO 353 SCRA 587 (2001) (1) At the beginning of term Art. Privilege and salary Art. Prohibitions Art. 13 Case . sec. COA 437 SCRA 655 (2004) BITONIO VS. 2. VII. AQUINO 558 SCRA 468 NERI VS. 2 Art. 7 Id.CLU VS. COA 425 SCRA 437 (2004) PUBLIC INTEREST VS. 2) (2) Secretary of Justice as members of Judicial and Bar Council (Art. AGRA 691 SCRA 196 (2013) Compare prohibitions against other officials Art. 3. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 194 SCRA 317 (1991) NATIONAL AMNESTY COMM. The President a. sec. VIII. 10 (2) During term Page 15 . term and oath Art. sec. 13 Art.. Qualifications. sec. JR. 8(1) (3) Ex officio positions d. par. sec. Succession Case – ESTRADA VS. VI. VII. COMELEC 424 SCRA 277 (2004) POE. VII.Constitutional Law 1 . secs. RAMOS 253 SCRA 559 (1996) TECSON VS. sec. sec. 7 Art. VII.

VII. 8 Id. COURT OF APPEALS 200 SCRA 271 (1991) JOSON VS. X. ERMITA 618 SCRA 488 (2010) (3) General supervision of local governments and autonomous regions Art. AGUIRRE 336 SCRA 201 (2000) BITO-ON VS. EXECUTIVE 531 SCRA 583 (2007) BANDA VS. sec 16 Cases . COMELEC 295 SCRA 157 (1998) e. ZAMORA 360 SCRA 718 (2001) SECRETARY VS.MARCOS VS.Art.. DIRECTOR GENERAL 487 SCRA 623 (2006) REVIEW CENTER VS. Removal Art. sec 10 (3) In case of temporary disability Art. sec. sec. sec.Syllabus . VII. MANGLAPUS 177 SCRA 668 and 178 SCRA 760 (1989) OPLE VS. secs.. 1 and 17 Cases . DENR EMPLOYEES 409 SCRA 359 (2003) CONSTANTINO VS. VII. 2-3 f. TIDCORP 692 SCRA 359 (2013) Cases – BUKLOD VS. GAITE 646 SCRA 309 (2011) MANALANG VS. XI. ENDRIGA 496 SCRA 13 (2006) MMDA VS. AQUINO III 728 SCRA 1 (2014) (2) Control of executive department Art. VII. VII. CUISIA 472 SCRA 505 (2005) RUFINO VS. secs. ERMITA 583 SCRA 428 (2009) ARAULLO VS. FERNANDEZ 350 SCRA 732 (2001) NATIONAL LIGA VS. 4 Id. MABALOT 378 SCRA 128 (2002) DENR VS. PAREDES 439 SCRA 130 (2004) Annotation – SUPERVISION & CONTROL 350 SCRA 742 (4) Power of appointment Page 16 . 11-12 Case – BORJA VS.Constitutional Law 1 . VIRON 530 SCRA 341 (2007) ANAK MINDANAO VS.GANZON VS. 17 Qualified Political Agency Case – ANGELES VS. Powers and Function of the President (1) Executive Power Art. TORRES 293 SCRA 141 (1998) KMU VS. secs. TORRES 290 SCRA 279 (1998) PIMENTEL VS. sec.

sec. secs. sec. ELMA 494 SCRA Page 17 . sec. VALENZUELA 298 SCRA 408 (1998) DE RAMA VS.. IX. XVIII. COMMISSION ON APPOINTMENTS 177 SCRA 259 (1992) (B) Upon recommendation of the Judicial and the Bar Council (a) Members of the Supreme Court and all other courts Art. B. sec. and consuls Art. 16 (b) Ambassadors. VII. OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT 678 SCRA 614 (2012) 714 SCRA 611 (2014) (F) Limitations on appointing power of the President Art. MATEO A. sec. 3) (D) Appointment solely by the President (Art. 13 and 15 Case . 1 (2) (e) Regular Members of the Judicial and Bar Council Art. VII. 16 (c) Officers of the armed forces from the rank of colonel and naval captain Art. sec. ENDRIGA 496 SCRA 13 (2006) (E) Power to Remove by the President Case . VII. 1 (2) Id. sec. SISTOZA 312 SCRA 239 MATIBAG VS. VII.GONZALES VS. TORRES 311 SCRA 733 (1999) RUFINO VS. sec. 9) (C) Appointment of the Vice President as member of the Cabinet (Art.RA 7941 Case – QUINTOS-DELES VS. ERMITA 472 SCRA 587 (05) (a) Heads of Departments Art. sec. XI. sec. BENIPAYO 380 SCRA 49 SORIANO VS. VII. CA 353 SCRA 94 (2001) PUBLIC INTEREST VS. sec.MANALO VS.(A) With consent of Commission on Appointments Cases .IN RE: HON. VII.Syllabus . 16) (a) Those whose appointments are not otherwise provided by law (b) Those whom he may be authorized by law to appoint Case – BERMUDEZ VS.Constitutional Law 1 . 9 (b) Ombudsman and Deputies (Art. VIII. public ministers. C. VIII. D. 7 . LISTA 399 SCRA 437 (2004) PIMENTEL VS. sec 8 (2) (f) Sectoral Representatives Art. 1 (2) Id. 16 (d) Chairman and Members of the Constitutional Commissions Art..

202 SCRA 378 (1991) PEOPLE VS.Syllabus . SALONGA. C. absence or any other cause. III. JBC 615 SCRA 666 (2010) 618 SCRA 639 (2010) BETOY VS. Code of 1987. sec. VII. BOARD OF DIRECTORS 658 SCRA 420 (2011) (F) Interim or Recess Appointments Art. 250 SCRA 581 (1995) IN RE: TORRES. VERA. 19 Art. GONZALES.TESORO VS. In no case shall a temporary designation exceed one (1) year. 251 SCRA 709 (1995) PEOPLE VS. appointment to which is vested in him by law. VII. sec. 14-16 (5) Executive clemencies Art. 172 SCRA 160 (1989) (G) Temporary Designations Adm. 17 The President may designate an officer already in the government service or any other competent person to perform the function of all office in the executive branch. 85 PHIL. GORDON 593 SCRA 68 (2009) DE CASTRO VS. 65 PHIL 56 (1987) (b) Pardon distinguished from parole Cases . secs.PEOPLE VS. CA.DRILON VS. CASIDO 269 SCRA 44 (1997) PEOPLE VS. or (b) there exists a vacancy. sec. COMELEC 673 SCRA 651 (2012) (a) Pardon distinguished from probation Case . IX. 642 (1940) (d) Effects of Pardon Page 18 . sec.. sec.BARRIOQUINTO VS. FERNANDEZ. SALLE JR.53 (2006) LIBAN VS. Bk. 2 Case – CONCEPCION BAUTISTA VS. VI. par. 16. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS 68 PHIL 154 (1939) TORRES VS. when: (a) The officer regularly appointed to the office is unable to perform his duties by reason of illness. 152 SCRA 272 (1987) (c) Pardon distinguished from amnesty Case .Constitutional Law 1 .5 Cases . 19 Art. VII. PATRIARCA 341 SCRA 464 (2000) MAGDALO VS. (H) Limitations on appointing power of Acting President Art.

Syllabus . 21 Case – CONSTANTINO VS. PONCE ENRILE. 23 (2) (8) Contracting and guaranteeing foreign loans Art. 1. 34 (1940) FELOBELLO VS.LLAMAS VS. sec. VII. 18 Art. GONZALES 152 SCRA 272 (1987) (f) Does pardoning power apply to administrative cases? Case . 13 Art. 170 SCRA 190 (1989) (e) Sanctions for violations of conditional pardons Case . FACTORAN. OFFICE 462 SCRA 265 (2005) Page 19 . 20 Art. EXECUTIVE 342 SCRA 449 (2002) PIMENTEL VS. 441 (1941) LACUNA VS.21 Case – BAYAN VS. SENGA 498 SCRA 671 (2006) FORTUN VS. VIII. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY 202 SCRA 844 (1991) (g) Who may avail of amnesty Case – PEOPLE VS. 42 SCRA 448 (1971) Overruled Cases . GARCIA. VI. VII.CRISTOBAL VS. ZAMORA 338 SCRA 81 (2000) LACSON VS. LABRADOR. III.TORRES VS. 24 SCRA 780 (1968) MONSANTO VS. 121 SCRA 472 (1983) IBP VS. CUISIA 472 SCRA 505 (2005) (9) Power over foreign affairs (a) Treaty making Art. MACAPAGAL-ARROYO 489 SCRA 160 (2006) GUDANI VS. MACAPAGAL-ARROYO 668 SCRA 504 (2012) (7) Emergency Powers Art.GARCIA-PADILLA VS. EXECUTIVE 421 SCRA 656 (2004) DAVID VS. sec. Sec. sec.Cases .LANSANG VS. VII.Constitutional Law 1 . 71 PHIL. PATRIARCA 341 SCRA 464 (2000) (6) Powers of Commander-in. Sec.Chief Art. par. 2 Affirmed: Case . 72 PHIL. ABES. PEREZ 357 SCRA 756 (2001) SANLAKAS VS. XII. sec. sec. PALATINO.

par. sec 3. VII.QUA CHEE GAN VS. sec. sec. 3 Id. sec. sec. sec. 22 Case – ARAULLO VS.GLORIA VS. MACAPAGAL-ARROYO 670 SCRA 664 (2012) SAEZ V..GARCIA VS. Prohibitions Art... 208 SCRA 133 (1992) (d) Emergency powers Art. VII. 23 (b) Preparation and submission of the budget Id. sec 27 Case . secs. sec. DEPORTATION BOARD.6 c. VI. (12) Power over legislation (a) Message to Congress Art. VI.BENGZON VS. EXECUTIVE SEC. Privilege and salary Art. term and oath Art. secs. AQUINO III 728 SCRA 1 (2014) (c) Veto power Art. XI. DEPORTATION BOARD. CEMENT 465 SCRA 532 (2005) (13) Immunity from suits Cases . VII. 3. Qualifications... 211 SCRA 219 (1992) SOUTHERN CROSS VS. sec.. sec.. GMA 660 SCRA 98 (2011) LOZADA VS.. CA 338 SCRA 5 (2000) RODRIGUEZ VS. sec. 2-3 f. 28 (2) Case . sec. VII. 13 Id. VI. Removal Art. par. Succession Art. Functions (1) Right of succession Art.Constitutional Law 1 . DRILON. 5 b. 2 d.Syllabus . VII. 2 Page 20 . election. sec. 9 SCRA 27 (1963) GO TEK VS. 4 Id. 23 (2) (e) Fixing of tariff rates Art. VII. 8 and 11 (2) Membership in Cabinet Art.Treaty distinguished from executive agreements (b) Deportation undesirable aliens Cases . 9 e. SCHEER 421 SCRA 468 (04) 2.S GMA 681 SCRA 686 (2012) Vice President a. VII. 79 SCRA 17 (1976) DOMINGO VS.

sec. 85 PHIL. MEER. ALBA. Removal Art. Fiscal autonomy Art.IN RE : RAUL M. 4 SC Resolution No. MALONES 604 SCRA 499 (2009) HENRY PANAY VS. Appointment and qualifications Art. 93 PHIL. XI. sec. par. Composition Art. VIII. VIII. XVIII. VIII. 11 Id.DE LA LLANA VS.. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. VIII. Security of Tenure Art. 2 Case . sec. 160 SCRA 771 (1988) f. 2-89 Cases . sec. 2 Case.. 17 Cases . sec. DAVID. sec 2.. Jurisdiction Judicial Power ANNOTATION – SUPREME COURT 358 SCRA 829 Cases – ONGSUCO VS. ELMA 517 SCRA 336 (2007) CITY OF TAGAYTAY VS. sec. VIII. JBC 615 SCRA 666 (2010) 618 SCRA 639 (2010) RE: SENIORITY AMONG FOUR APPOINTMENTS 631 SCRA 377 (2010) c.. NLRC 604 SCRA 362 (2009) TAN SR VS. 9 Case – IN RE: VALENZUELA 298 SCRA 408 (1998) DE CASTRO VS. GUERRERO 600 SCRA 33 (2009) b. COMELEC 689 SCRA 97 92013) PAGCOR VS. VIII. GONZALES. sec. 6 not exempt from income tax Case. THUNDERBIRD 720 SCRA 178 (2014) (1) Art. XV. sec. 11 Art. 8 (5) Id. sec.PERFECTO VS. 7 (1) Id. THE JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT 1. 112 SCRA 294 (1982) e. VIII. 17 Art.Syllabus . The Supreme Court a. MATSURA 688 SCRA 263 (2013) GIRON VS. 1 (2) Id.Constitutional Law 1 . 696 (1953) Compare 1973 Const. 3 Case – CSC VS.C. 152 SCRA 284 (1987) d. sec. sec. Salary Art. sec. 5 Page 21 . 522 (1950) ENDENCIA VS. DEPARTMENT 464 SCRA 115 (2005) RE: CLARIFYING 481 SCRA 1 (2006) RE: COA OPINION 678 SCRA 1 (2012) g.NITAFAN VS.PUBLIC INTEREST VS. Art. sec.

VIII. 7 h. 14. DARAPA 646 SCRA 200 (2011) REPUBLIC VS. par. JBC 676 SCRA 579 (2012) BCDA VS. VIII. 7 Cases . VII. RAMONEDA-PITA 696 SCRA 155 (13) IN RE: REQUEST FOR GUIDANCE 708 SCRA 502 (2013) (2) Temporarily assign judges to other stations in the public interest Art. PET 651 SCRA 239 (2011) (5) Art. Congressional power over jurisdiction of Supreme Court Art. sec. 2. sec. XII. VIII. 4. PEOPLE 660 SCRA 235 (2011) LORZANO VS. 2 (practice of professions) Art. REYES 699 SCRA 217 (2013) REPUBLIC VS. A. VI. DE GUZMAN 652 SCRA 101 (11) CUA VS. sec. sec. DESIERTO 295 SCRA 470 (1998) i. No quasi-judicial and administrative work of judges Art. 5(6) j. DE CASTRO 542 SCRA 125 (08) MAKALINTA VS. GACOTT 689 SCRA 452 (2013) Art. Administrative powers (1) Supervision of lower courts Case . sec. GACOTT 246 SCRA 52 (1996) (5) Appointment of officials and employees of entire judiciary Art. sec. sec. VIII.Constitutional Law 1 . par. sec. IX. OMBUDSMAN 361 SCRA 395 FUENTES VS. ORTIGAS 717 SCRA 601 (2014) (3) Art.3 (4) Art. TABAYAG 665 SCRA 38 (2012) CHAVEZ VS. sec. 30 Cases – FIRST VS. SECRETARY 301 SCRA 96 (1999) k. OMBUDSMAN 368 SCRA 36 (2001) ADAJAR VS. 12 Page 22 . VIII. CA 237 SCRA 519 (1994) FABIAN VS. 18. par. VIII.CAOIBES VS. VII.TECSON VS. DEVELOS 475 SCRA 361 (2005) CSC VS. sec. 11 Case – PEOPLE VS. par. VIII. 3 Case – ECHEGARAY VS. par. 18. Rule Making Art. 5 (5) Case – IN RE: IBP ELECTIONS 696 SCRA 8 (2013) YLAYA VS. 5(3) (3) Order a change of venue or place of trial to avoid miscarriage of justice Art. sec. sec. 5(4) (4) Discipline of judges Art. COMELEC 424 SCRA 277 (2004) LEGARDA VS.Syllabus . VII. 1 Art. sec.Cases - ABALOS VS.

Manner of sitting and votes required Art. VIII. VIII. sec. 11 Id.Constitutional Law 1 . sec. 18.. 112 SCRA 294 (1982) d. 13-14 Cases – MANGELEN VS.Cases . XVIII. Mandatory period for deciding Page 23 . sec. 7(1) (2) Id. VIII. 7 (1997 Rules on Civil Procedure) Rule 125.. Salary Art. 3 (2000 Rules on Criminal Procedure) Case – LEAGUE OF CITIES VS. Qualifications and appointment Art. 166 SCRA 246 (1988) CHAVEZ VS. 4 Rule 56. sec. Congressional power to reorganize and security of tenure Art. VIII. PEOPLE 630 SCRA 42 (2010) o. sec. 15 Art. sec. 12-14 Cases – OCA VS. 2.DE LA LLANA VS. SANDIGANBAYAN 628 SCRA 502 (2010) LUMANOG VS.YNOT VS IAC. 15 g. JBC 676 SCRA 579 (2012) l. Requirements as to decisions Art. sec.RE: SENIORITY AMONG FOUR APPOINTMENTS 631 SCRA 377 (2010) b. VIII. CA. Requirements as to preparation of decisions Art. VIII. GACOTT 246 SCRA 52 (1996) e. par. 11 Case – PEOPLE VS. sec. Jurisdiction Art.Syllabus . COMELEC 608 SCRA 636 (2009) AM-99-1-09 SC n. 3 Art. sec. 9 Case. 16 m. VIII. 2 . sec. secs. secs. 215 SCRA 230 (1992) GERMAN MACHINERIES VS. 10 c. ALBA. ENDAYA 444 SCRA 323 (2004) PEOPLE VS. Removal Art. sec. VIII.. Report on the judiciary Art. sec. sec. par. 8(5) Id. FUENTES III 692 SCRA 429 (2013) IN RE: CARBONELL 700 SCRA 806 (2013) RE: CASES OF JUDGE BALUNA 704 SCRA 415 (2013) Lower courts a. sec 1 Case . 148 SCRA 659 (1987) f. VIII.IN RE JUDGE RODOLFO MANZANO. Mandatory period for deciding cases Art. VII. VIII. 2 Cases . sec.

201 SCRA 210 (1991) b.Art. COA 432 SCRA 126 (2004) Page 24 . 16 Cases . sec. 85 PHIL. 93867. 85 PHIL. VERA.Syllabus . B. The Judicial and Bar Council Art. 3 5. IX.Constitutional Law 1 . G. 2 Impeachment Art. B. B. 18. NO. par. sec.NACIONALISTA PARTY VS. sec. IMPERIAL. 2 f. Appointment of personnel of CSC Art. sec. VIII. 231 SCRA 211 (1994) D. sec. XVIII. 8 Case . Composition and qualifications of Commissioners Art. sec. IX. IX. Automatic release of appropriations for the judiciary Art. Appointment and term of office of Commissioners. 13. 15 Art. 2(1) For definition of “government owned or controlled corporations with original charters. THE CONSTITUTIONAL COMMISSIONS 1. ASUNCION. 101 (1949) BRILLANTES VS. secs. CSC 605 SCRA 61 (2009) h. MONSOD. JBC 696 SCRA 496 (2013) 4. sec. IX. 96 PHIL. XII. LIM 724 SCRA 433 (2014) c. VIII. 1990 NP VS.CAYETANO VS.DE CASTRO VS. Disqualifications Art.REPUBLIC VS. JBC 615 SCRA 666 (2010) 618 SCRA 639 (2010) CHAVEZ VS. CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION a. Rule against reappointment Art. ANGELO BAUTISTA. 149 (1951) REPUBLIC VS. 4 d. g. 12. 1 (1) Art.3 e. Powers – Case – BARCELONA VS.” See Art. VII. Salary Art. 1(2) Cases. Court Martial Case .R. 17 Art. sec. LORENZO 316 SCRA 570 (1999) 3. COA 347 655 (2000) c. IX. NLRC 277 SCRA 528 (1997) HDMF VS. sec. 2 Case. XVIII. DEC. sec. sec. sec. IX. XI.14 Case – ADAO VS. A. A. YORAC.JUCO VS. Appeal – CAPABLANCA VS. Scope of the civil service Art. sec. VIII. 770 (1955) GAMINDE VS. JBC 676 SCRA 579 (2012) CHAVEZ VS. A.

COA 703 SCRA 501 (2013) FUNA VS. COA 718 SCRA 402 (2014) a. COMELEC (1ST DIVISION) 603 SCRA 292 (2009) CAGAS VS. A. sec. 17 e.Syllabus . IX. COMELEC 663 SCRA 644 (2012) JALOSJOS VS. TEJANO 604 SCRA 147 (2009) 2. sec. Rule against reappointment Art. 2 g. a. sec. IX. 3 Art. REPUBLIC 663 SCRA 514 (2012) VERZOSA VS. COMELEC 699 SCRA 522 (2013) 703 SCRA 197 (2013) 3. 1 (1) Art. 2 b. A. MANILA OFFICE 715 SCRA 247 (2015) TESDA VS. VILLAR 670 SCRA 579 (2012) FUNA VS. C. Disqualifications Art. CARAGUE 665 SCRA 124 (2012) DELOS SANTOS VS. XVIII. 1(2) c. par. sec. VII. A. Appeal Case . D.GANCES VS. Salary Art. COMELEC 674 SCRA 530 (2012) LOKIN JR VS. IX. A. XVIII. IX.Constitutional Law 1 . Appointment And term of commissioners Art. par. A. VII. 1(1) Art. sec. sec. Appointment and term of office of Commissioners. IX. sec. IX. Composition and qualifications of Commissioners Art. 259 SCRA 99 (1996) COMMISSION ON AUDIT Powers – Cases – VELOSO VS. IX. 3 Art. sec. sec. COMELEC 693 SCRA 605 (2013) ATONG PAGLAUM VS. Salary Art. sec. COMELEC 674 SCRA 538 SEVILLA VS. 2 f. 1 (2) c. XI. Appointment of COA personnel Art. sec. 4 d. COA 661 SCRA 563 (2011) COCOFED VS. 4 d. sec. IX.PNB VS. CA. IX. Impeachment Art. 17 Page 25 . sec. sec. Appointment of personnel Art. COMELEC 694 SCRA 477 (2013) REYES VS. COA 656 SCRA 767 (2011) AGRA VS. 2 d. 13. Composition and qualifications Art. 12. D. C. COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS Cases – BARRO VS.

Art. 1 2.Syllabus . XVII.GONZALES VS. PROPOSAL Art. sec. 1.GONZALES VS. By the people through initiatives Art. 2 f. THEORIES REGARDING THE POSITION OF A CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION IN OUR SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT Case . 50 SCRA 30 (1972) Art. par. 6735. 4. By Constitutional Convention Art. COMELEC. JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE AMENDING PROCESS Cases . 5 &9(b) Case . COMELEC. 21 SCRA 774 (1967) TOLENTITNO VS. In case of amendments proposed through initiative Art. 4. 2 3. XVII. COA 305 SCRA 512 (1999) REBLORA VS.e. IX. COMELEC 270 SCRA 106 (1997) B. Act No. sec. In case amendments proposed by Congress or Convention Art. 2 Rep. 1.GONZALES VS. 3 3. Impeachment Art. 41 SCRA 702 (1967) JAVELLANA VS. Appeal – REYES VS.SANTIAGO VS. XVII. RATIFICATION 1. sec. secs. COMELEC. 21 SCRA 774 (1967) 1. A. XVII.. sec. SUPRA 2. EXECUTIVE SECRETARY. VIII. par. par. sec. XV Case . but the initiative on Constitution will be called by COMELEC C. 2 g. By Congress Art. XVII. SECS. XI. Disqualifications Art. 41 SCRA 701 (1971) D. sec. XVII. COMELEC. Plebiscite to be called by Congress and supervised by COMELEC. sec. AFP 698 SCRA 727 (2013) VI.Constitutional Law 1 . sec. THE AMENDING PROCESS A.TOLENTINO VS.1935 Const. 1-2 Case . COMELEC. 1 consti 1 syllabus - Page 26 .