You are on page 1of 6

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT


---------------------------------
ht

Civil Action. 07-11437-DPW


tp

PAUL L. MUCKLE, ET AL.


Plaintiffs, Appellants,
:

V.
//t

FREMONT INVSTMENT AND LOANS,


ASC/WELLS FARGO, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATES,
he

S.G. MORTGAGE SBAC, THE ENTIRE MORTGAGE INDUSTRY,


THE SECURITIES/ DIVIDENT INDUSTRY, ET AL.
re

Defendants, Appellees
--------------------------------------------
&
al

Civil Action - 09-10678-DPW


re

PAUL L. MUCKLE,
Plaintiff, Appellant.
vo

V.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
lu

PRES. BARACK H. OBAMA, PRES. GEORGE W. BUSH,


tio

TIMOTHY GEITHNER, HENRY M. PAULSON JR., WILLIAM H.


DANOLDSON, THE GOVERNORS OF ALL 50 STATES, ET, AL.
na

Defendants, Appellees
r

APPELLANTS NOTICE OF APPEALS


ie

They did not heed the trumpets, now here comes the broadside!
s .n

Now comes the appellants in the above entitled matter and triumphantly declares,

“The battles have been joined”. After three years of fighting for and being constantly
in
g.

denied my efforts to join ALL of the defendants in one single suit on one single
co

battlefield, charging them all with mortgage and securities fraud against the People of the

United States of America, the Honorable Judge Douglas P. Woodlock has played into
m

Muckle‟s hands and did it on his own accord, by joining civil-action numbers 07-11437 –
DPW and 09-10678-DPW in the very same opinion. They have now been legally joined;

what god has joined, let no other gods lay asunder unless it is legally impermissible.
ht

Thank you, O honorable One! Great job; I knew you was on the side of Good, (God) all
tp

along.; You just did not know it, but WE did.


:

The Appellants now serves NOTICE OF APPEAL of their intent to appeal the order
//t

of the judge in granting Summary Judgment to the Defendants, and in among other
he

digressions, for dismissing both of the complaints without first conducing any type of
re

evidentiary hearing.
al

„In an appeal from a dismissal and a motion for summary judgment on a complaint
re

involving Constitutional questions, Appellate Courts generally defer to the sound


vo

discretion of the trial judge. In exercising this discretion, the Appellate Court must

determine whether the motion for summary judgment, and complaint raises a “substantial
lu

issue” that would require an evidentiary hearing. The Appeals Court must also consider
tio

the adequacy of the Appellant in showing that there was a “substantial issue” meriting a
na

trial, and/or an evidentiary hearing. In the two cases mentioned above, the plaintiffs
r

raised “several substantial issues” meriting a trial, or in the least, an evidentiary hearing.
ie

In these two present cases, the trial judge held no such evidentiary hearing to justify his
s

“treasonous rulings” against his own American people; therefore, the Appeals Court have
.n

no record to go on except the judge‟s own unprecedented opinions that are not rooted in
in
g.

the language of the United States Constitution. For that alone, the Appeals Court can only
co

go on the merits of the complaints, the evidence presented, and the adequacy of the

plaintiffs in showing that laws were broken and injury was sustained. Because of the
m

judge‟s own actions in allowing the case to proceed this far with Muckle representing
himself and his mother, Plaintiff Irene H. Wood, he has already lost the “Standing” battle.

He does not validly say why he reversed himself; his reasoning is quite flawed.
ht

As I informed the Honorable One back in 2007, this case was going to be historical,
tp

and he was going to make history. I gave him a choice to choose which side he wanted to
:

be on. He chose wrong. I told him that history will judge him. He doubted me and took
//t

me for a joke. Yet he has done what I had predicted. This appeal is historical. Due to the
he

fact that the two cases are now joined in Appeal, never in written history of mankind has
re

one man, a pro se litigant without a college degree, and only four years of schooling,
al

taken two presidents, three treasury secretaries, two SEC chiefs, fifty governors of fifty
re

states, and the entire mortgage and securities industry into a court of law, in the very
vo

same case, and on the very same battlefield, charging them with criminal and civil

infractions against all the People of the United States of America. Muckle has called out
lu

Goliath! Now that Goliath has more defenders backing him up, will he cower and run
tio

away from me again like he did on Judge Woodlock‟s battleground?


na

If Goliath has any --- [sic], and he stands and fight like a man, it is going to be
r

historic, a momentous legal bloodbath, the greatest one for the history books. Never in
ie

the history of man has such a battle been waged in a court of law. Is the Appellate Court
s .n

for the First Circuit equipped to even handle the case which will be spoken about for
in

thousands of years to come, or are they gonna kick it to the Supreme Ones without facing
g.

Muckle in a fair debate? Are they going to run away from Muckle too? It is as if people

crumble when they hear Muckle‟s voice. Everyone is afraid to face little Muck in a fair
co

debate; his simple layman‟s wisdom put the wisdom of the wise men to foolishness.
m
The day the two clashes, will be the day that America will be free from the financial

Oligarchs.
ht

Seeing, yet they do not see, hearing yet they do not hear the Revolution has begun!
tp

This Revolution will not be televised; cameras are not allowed in the federal Appellate
:

Courts. This is a Revolution by Civil Action. WE ARE RECAPTURING OUR


//t

COUNTRY FROM THE TREACHEROUS HANDS OF THE FINANCIAL


he

OLIGARCHS! The Honorable members of the Appeals court are encouraged to join the
re

revolt. “Soon we will find out who are the Real Revolutionaries, because I do not want
al

the people to be tricked by mercenaries.” The rallying cry shall be “Remember 1812-
re

1815 British/Nathan Rothschild-American War. I have come to seek revenge! I humbly


vo

ask the members of this Court to give me pass and clear my way.

The defendants did not heed the trumpets in the District Court, let this serve as a notice
lu

that, „now comes the “broadside”‟


tio

As the Honorable One likes to say, “Hope is eternal.”


na

Respectfully submitted,
r

Paul L. Muckle,
ie

____________________________________
s .n
in

Irene H. Wood
g.

____________________________________
co
m
m
co
g.
in
s.n
rie
na
tio
lu
vo
re
al
re
he
://t
tp
ht
m
co
g.
in
s.n
rie
na
tio
lu
vo
re
al
re
he
://t
tp
ht