You are on page 1of 21

Smiths policies on education

should be adopted, with particular


reference to Exeter
University Discuss
Ollie Ekins, Harriet Kurzynski and Maiwand Nangyal

Overview

Background
Outline of policies
Advantages and disadvantages of policies
Application of policies to Exeter University
Conclusion

Background of:

5 June 1723 - born in Kirkcaldy


1726 - abducted by gypsies
1737 - Glasgow university at 14
1740 - Oxford university at 17
1748 - Edinburgh university professor in
rhetoric
1751 - Glasgow university professor in moral
philosophy, logic, literature and rhetoric
1759 - published Theory of Moral Sentiments
1764 - personal tutor to son of Duke of
Buccleuch
1773 - 1776 - studied in London with old
friends, wrote majority of WoN
1776 published The Wealth of Nations. Ideas
filtered into the real life economy in the 19th
Century
1778 appointed Commissioner of Customs in
Edinburgh (salary of 600)
17 July 1790 died in Edinburgh

Smiths policies on education


1. Endowments should not be used for lecturers salaries and should instead be
invested into the university itself

2. Public vs private schools - Smith promoted private schools since less Govt
intervention and more sustainability was needed.

3. Free market of professors - idea that salary is based on ability to attract students.

Policy 1 - Removal of endowments for lecturers income


and the adoption of the Scottish system of HE

Endowments are donations from individuals for


investments into universities, with the goal of gaining a
return from it.

In Smiths time:

Around Smiths time the endowments to Oxford served as


the professors income, meaning their salary was
independent from their university or from students fees.
Smith was hugely critical of this, claiming that because of
this payment structure, professors had given up the
pretence of teaching.

Policy 1 - Removal of endowments for lecturers income


and the adoption of the Scottish system of HE
Smiths policy -Scotlands university education vs Englands:

Smith felt that Scottish higher education system was superior to the endowment
driven English system
Scottish lecturers had fairly small salaries and depended on the students that
they attracted for their course, for the majority of their income. Students also
paid honoraria to specific lecturers- an incentive based system
Smith felt that England and the rest of Europe should indeed adopt this Scottish
system
Endowments should be spent on universitys infrastructure instead

Advantages with application to Exeter


- Lecturers will be held accountable by the students to provide the best
learning possible, leading to high student satisfaction and a better
reputation for Exeter

- Honoraria means that the best lecturers will still have high incomes and
so do not need to worry about the removal of endowments. Best
lecturers will remain at Exeter and so will world class teaching

- Investment in infrastructure will mean better facilities for students and


teaching. University will rise up the rankings in terms of research quality
in the long term

Disadvantages with application to Exeter


- Teachers will be more insecure about their jobs, and will
look to leave. Departments may become short staffed and
so Exeter may end up with less qualified teachers

- May lead to a contest of popularity between lecturerssome lecturers may have good relations with the students,
but not actually be good at teaching. Students are also not
mature enough to choose their courses. This will lead to a
drop in exam performances for Exeter students and
therefore a fall in rankings and reputation

Question#1
Should endowments be mainly used to fund lecturers
salaries or should it be spent elsewhere?
A- It should be used to fund teachers only

B- It should be used to fund other aspects of the university and not fund the lecturer's
salaries
C- It should be a mixture, and the best lecturers salaries should be financed by the
endowments

Policy 2 - Public vs private schools


During Smiths time:

Government provided funding for public schooling


Very few private schools

Smiths policy:

Thought there should be more private education to free up expenditure for the
government

Advantages

Opportunity cost- government saving from education expenditure

Private schools profit motive incentive to improve

More to spend on University investments & justice, defence, infrastructure

Better quality education; increasing demand (shifts right)

Long run- arguably more university applicants

providing more income; facilities, research, teaching

Disadvantages

Education would not be available to all

Schooling & university would become elitist institutions


Counteracts Smiths belief

Government bursaries
Increased competition for public school places

Quality of education not necessarily improved via private provision

Corruption

People may relocate to where education is free

Some children may not receive proper education

diminish skills set, unemployment may increase

During Smiths time very few private schools

Could have created a monopoly


Set their own prices
Consumer exploitation consumer surplus

Question#2
What is the biggest disadvantage of the private
provision of schools?
A-Education will not be available to everyone, the poor will be excluded
B-Private education may not necessarily improve the quality of teaching
C- Creation of a monopoly and an elitist group within the education sector
D-Public schools will become more oversubscribed and so their level of teaching will
fall

Policy 3 - Free market of professors


Before Smith:
Salaries of professors were fixed - low quality of teaching
and low incentive to improve (as stated by Smith at
Oxford university).
Smiths policy:
Make professors salaries performance-based; based
purely on the number of students they were able to
attract.
Very significant benefits arising from this theory, but there
are also some drawbacks.

Advantages (with reference to Exeter University)

Encourages professors to increase


their teaching quality to attract
more students.

Exeter attracts the best lecturers


around the world, increasing
reputation for teaching quality.

Reduction in X-inefficiency

Exeter - more competition between


workers, again lead to higher teaching
quality within the institution.

Advantages (with reference to Exeter University) cont.

Consequences for Exeter University:

Rise up the rankings (nationally and globally)

Off the back of this, higher funding from third party


groups and sponsors, meaning university capital
accumulation.

Advantages (with reference to Exeter University) cont.

Consequences for Exeter University:

Attract more undergraduate and postgraduate


students

Problem with this is UK has hubs (London,


Birmingham, Manchester)

Disadvantages (with reference to Exeter University)

May discourage lecturers to


teach as their salary is not likely
to be fixed year on year.
At Exeter, this may lead to poorer
performing students and degrees,
and the university could therefore
fall in the rankings.

Tense working atmosphere


between workers due to more
competition to attract students
- unpleasant working
environment.

Exclusion of poor people from


attending lectures due to high fees.

Contradicts Smiths belief of education


being available to all.

Counterproductive as it leads to:

Increased unskilled labour


Larger inequality gap.

Disadvantages (with reference to Exeter University) cont.


Other consequence for Exeter:

Analysis:

Fixed fees of 9,000 - Smith would not


support this due to differences in teaching
qualities between universities.
E.g. Exeter teaching quality < Cambridge
teaching quality, so fees adjusted
accordingly.
Consequence -> pupils pay lower fees ->
reduction in professors salaries -> reduction in
professors at Exeter University -> reduction in
quality of teaching.

Argued cycle of decline. Hence


could be reason for fixed fee
instead of variable fee.
But 9k too much and
contradict Smith - excludes
poor from accessing university.

Questions #3
Should a free market system of lecturers be applied to
Exeters Economics degree?
A- It should be applied because it will improve the teaching standards dramatically.
B- It should be applied because the students deserve to choose their lecturers/courses
because they will be paying the themselves
C-It should not be applied, students will not know who the best lecturer/course is
within a short period of time
D- It should not be applied, John Maloney is the best lecturer in the department, and
so his course would be oversubscribed and many people would be left out of the
lectures

Conclusion

Practicality of Smiths policies must be questioned


Endowments should be used to finance other aspects of the university such as
infrastructure and for scholarships to students, rather than for used solely for
lecturers income.
Increasing private education not practical

still require government spending- bursaries


& would not be available to all elitist institution