5 views

Uploaded by Aysun Güven

exp

- Corrugated Plate Interceptor
- Orifice Plate
- PS 100 015 001 A4 Instrument General Specification
- Orifice
- Fundamentals of Orifice Metering
- Modelling of Metal Flow for Bearing Design
- 86 Measuring a Discharge Coefficient of an Orifice for an Unsteady Compressible Flow (1)
- Chapter 3 fluid dynamics.pdf
- IES Mechanical Sylladb
- Rev3 Bridges Summary
- PS-HP
- S-000-1360-0001V_1 General Specification for Piping
- Fluids Past Papers.pdf
- Mech3-8Cur_Syll.pdf
- Numerical Determination
- Dimensional Analysis Me.metu
- ME-220 Individual Project
- AIChE-155f
- 8 Fundamental Equation of Fluid Flow
- Relative Residence Time and Oscillatory Shear Index of Non

You are on page 1of 8

4

CALIBRATION OF AN ORIFICE PLATE FLOWMETER

MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

KING SAUD UNIVERSITY

RIYADH

Submitted By:

ID: 123456789

GROUP A

EXPERIMENT PERFORMED ON 29/01/2013

Introduction

In this experiment an orifice plate flow-meter is calibrated and the calculated coefficient

of discharge, Cd , is compared to the given value in the lab report as well as other published

data.

The orifice plate flow-meter provides a simple and low cost method for measuring the flow

rate in a pipe using the pressure drop measurement across the plate. The orifice plate is a

circular plate with a sharp square edge hole in the center inserted in a pipe. When a fluid

is allowed to flow inside the pipe, the orifice plate obstructs the flow which results in fluid

pressure loss. A schematic diagram of an orifice plate installed in a pipe with flow from left

to right is shown in figure 1. The pressure loss is dependent on the orifice diameter, pipe

diameter and the flow rate. Hence the flow rate is less than the theoretical flow rate which

would occur if there were no losses.

For ideal flow (no viscous effects) the flow rate can be calculated from Bernoullis equation,

as follows, [3],

p1 V12

p2 V22

+

+ gz1 =

+

+ gz2

(1)

2

Where, p, , V , z and g are the fluid pressure, density, velocity, elevation and acceleration

due to gravity, respectively. The subscripts 1 and 2 denote the conditions upstream and

downstream of the plate, respectively, as shown in figure 2

Since the flow is incompressible we can write the flow velocity upstream of the orifice, V1 ,

in terms of the throat velocity, V2 , using the continuity equation given in equation 2, [3],

2

A1 V 1 = A2 V 2

d2

A2

V2 = 22 V2 = 2 V2

V1 =

A1

d1

(2)

(3)

Where, = dd21 and d1 , d2 are the pipe and throat diameters, respectively. Substituting

equation 3 into equation 1 assuming the flow is horizontal (z1 = z2 = 0), we get,

"

V22 V12

= 1

2

4 #

V22 =

2 (p1 p2 )

(4)

1 4 V22 =

2 (p1 p2 )

(5)

2 (p1 p2 )

(6)

d2

d1

1

V2 = p

1 4

Since the flow rate, Q, is given by Q = AV , where A and V are the cross-section area and

average speed at any section, respectively, then we write the flow rate across the orifice plate

as follows,

A2

Q = A2 V 2 = p

1 4

2 (p1 p2 )

(7)

Equation 7, gives an expression for the maximum theoretical volume flow rate assuming ideal

flow. However, since real flows are viscous, hence, the maximum flow rate will be less than

the ideal value due to viscous losses. This is taken into account by multiplying the ideal Q

by a factor, Cd , this factor is the coefficient of discharge. Hence, we can define the coefficient

of discharge as the ratio of actual to ideal volume flow rate.

QActual = Cd QIdeal

C d A2

=p

1 4

2 (p1 p2 )

(8)

The coefficient of discharge depends on the Reynolds number based on the pipes diameter

as well as the orifice diameter to pipe diameter ratio, .

The main objective of this experiment is to determine this coefficient. In the next section,

the apparatus and techniques used to determine Cd are discussed. In section 3 the results

3

and discussion are presented, then finally conclusions are drawn in section 4

2

2.1

Apparatus

The orifice plate used is part of SOLTEQ flow-meter measurement apparatus, model FM 101,

shown in Figure 3.

The SOLTEQ FM 101 flow meter apparatus consists of three different types of volume

flow-meters. It contains a Venturi type flow-meter, an orifice plate flow-meter as well as a

Rotameter. All flow-meters are connected in series. The apparatus also includes a flow control

valve that can be used to adjust the volume flow rate. Water is allowed into the apparatus

through the water inlet and is dumped through the water outlet as shown in Figure 3. The

apparatus is connected to a TQ H-10 Volumetric Bench, which contains a closed circuit water

pump. The water exiting the FM 101 module is dumped in a collection tank and is pumped

back into the water inlet.

The SOLTEQ FM 101 also contains a multi-tube manometer to measure the difference

in pressure across the Venturi and orifice plate flow-meters. The manometer has a range of

450 mm and the graduation is in 1 mm increments.

The orifice plate flow-meter, shown in Figure 4(a), is fitted with two pressure taps located

one tube diameter upstream of the orifice plate and half a tube diameter downstream the plate.

The difference in these pressures is the required p in equation 8. The tube diameter, D, is

equal to 26 mm while the orifice-meter throat diameter, DT , is equal to 16 mm. Therefore

the ratio of diameters, , is = DDT = 0.6154.

4

(b) Rotameter.

2.2

In this experiment, the SOLTEQ FM-101 was connected to the TQ H-10 Volumetric Bench.

The flow-rate was set at three different values 5, 10 and 15 L/min. This was done by adjusting

the flow control valve. The volume flow-rate value was read off the Rotameter. Before any

measurements were taken, the flow was allowed to reach a steady condition such that there are

no air bubbles in the system and all pressure readings were stable. Once the pressure readings

in the manometer were stable and all air bubbles were out, the pressure measurements were

recorded for each volume flow-rate. Each time the valve position changed, the flow was allowed

to stabilize before recording the new pressure readings. The measurements were repeated for

the 10 L/min flow-rate case for uncertainty estimates purposes. It is worth noting that

reading the water height in the manometer was difficult due to the fact that the water used

was clear and the background was white.

In this section the results will be presented and discussed. The atmospheric pressure and

temperature during the experiment were measured to be 940 1.5 mbar and 22 1 C,

respectively. Since the working fluid is water, the water temperature was measured to be

20 1 C. The water density, , and viscosity, , at this temperature were taken as

998.2 kg/m3 and 103 P a s, respectively, [2].

The pressure measurements upstream, p1 , and downstream, p2 , of the orifice plate are

shown in Table 1. Also shown in Table 1, are the average velocity U and the Reynolds

Q

4Q

=

A

D2

U D

ReU =

U=

(9)

(10)

Where, and are the water density and viscosity, respectively. Finally, using equation 8

Table 1: Pressure Measurement

Q [L/min]

5

10

15

10

p1 [mmH2 O ]

295

286

283

287

p2 [mmH2 O ]

143

220

263

218

U [m/s]

0.47

0.31

0.16

0.32

12220 8147 4973 8147

ReU

Cd

0.667 0.675 0.613 0.667

we can write the coefficient of discharge, Cd , as follows,

Q

Cd =

A2

(1 4 )

2 (p1 p2 )

(11)

Equation 11 is used to calculate the values of Cd shown in Table 1. The measured discharge

coefficient values are close to the supplied value in the lab manual of 0.63. While recording

the pressure measurements it was noticed that there are some fluctuations in the pressure

values. This might be due to the fact that the pipe length between the Venturi-meter ,and

the orifice flow-meter is too short, less than three pipe diameters. This was amplified when

the flow rate was set to 5L/min, which corresponds to a Re = 4973. This value is in the

transition region, hence the flow is not fully turbulent. To get a better reading there should

be longer pipe connecting the venturi-meter and the orifice plate or the Reynolds number

should be increased. In the next section the uncertainty in measured quantities is presented.

3.1

Uncertainty Analysis

Uncertainty analysis is performed based on two readings of the pressure difference at 10 L/min

flow-rate. The values are listed in Table 2.

Table 2: Pressure Measurement for uncertainty estimates at Q = 10 L/min

Run

1

2

p

Sp

p1 [mmH2 O ] 286 287 286.5 0.707

p2 [mmH2 O ] 220 218 219 1.414

Where, p and Sp are the mean and standard deviation of the measured pressures, respecS

tively. The uncertainty in the measured pressure is given by Up = t/2, pn , Where t is the

t-distribution and = 0.05 is the level of significance, and = n 1, where n = 2 is the

number of observations. Hence, the uncertainties in the upstream and downstream pressures

6

Sp

0.707

Up1 = t0.05,1 1 = 12.706 = 6.35 mm H2 O

n

2

Sp2

1.414

Up2 = t0.05,1 = 12.706 = 12.71 mm H2 O

n

2

(12)

(13)

(14)

s

UCd =

Cd

UQ

Q

2

Cd

Up

p1 1

2

Cd

Up

p2 2

2

(15)

The uncertianty in the measured flow-rate is taken to be 4% F ull Scale, such that Q =

0.88 L/min. Using equation 11 and the calculated pressure and flow-rate uncertainties we

can evaluate the uncertainty in Cd as UCd = 0.075.

Since in general the discharge coefficient is a function of the Reynolds number, Re, a plot of

the measured Cd versus the Reynolds number is shown in Figure 5. Also shown in the figure

is a curve fit for experimental data reported in the literature versus Re as given by equation

16, [1]. The length L1 and L2 are the pressure taps locations upstream and downstream,

respectively. In this case, L1 = d1 and L2 = d2 .

Cd = 0.5959 + 0.0312

2.1

0.1840 + 0.0029

L1

+0.0900

D

"

2.5

106

Re

!0.75

4

L2

3

0.0337

4

(1 )

D

(16)

The measured coefficient of discharge is Cd = 0.67 0.075 while the value supplied in the lab

manual is 0.63. This is about 6% difference. However, the measured values are within 4.5%

from the empirical relation given by equation 16 for Q = 10, 15 L/min while the difference

is 8% for the case Q = 5 L/min. This is probably due to the low Reynolds number which is

in the transition region. To get higher accuracy we need to make more measurements with

more accurate pressure transducers.

Conclusions

In this work the discharge coefficient of an orifice plate flow-meter was estimated at three

values of flow rate, Q = 5, 10 and 15 L/min. The measured values were compared with the

values obtained from the lab manual and from a curve fit of empirical data. The following

conclusions are made,

The mean coefficient of discharge was estimated to be Cd = 0.67 0.075

The difference between current measured Cd and values in the literature are within

experimental uncertainty

Main source of uncertainty is the unsteadiness in pressure measurement. This is due to

the fact that the Reynolds number is in the transition region for low values of flow rates

The variation in Cd versus the Reynolds number follows the curve fit of empirical data

in the literature

The results can be improved if a more accurate manometer is used as well as more data

points are taken

Using a very light dye in the water would improve will eliminate human reading errors

References

[1] Emperical fit for cd : www.brighthubengineering.com/.

[2] Water properties: www.engineeringtoolbox.com/.

[3] Robert W. Fox Alan T. McDonald Philip J. Pritchard. Fluid Mechanics. John Wiley &

Sons, eighth edition, 2012.

[4] Thomas G. Beckwith Roy D. Marangoni John H. Lienhard V. Mechanical Measurements.

Addison Wesley, fifth edition, 1993.

- Corrugated Plate InterceptorUploaded byDavid Lambert
- Orifice PlateUploaded bychemeng2004
- PS 100 015 001 A4 Instrument General SpecificationUploaded byEdison Bayazid
- OrificeUploaded bymoha323
- Fundamentals of Orifice MeteringUploaded byScotchWhisky82
- Modelling of Metal Flow for Bearing DesignUploaded byLucian Dragos
- 86 Measuring a Discharge Coefficient of an Orifice for an Unsteady Compressible Flow (1)Uploaded byKayla Dollente
- Chapter 3 fluid dynamics.pdfUploaded bySusana Vadillo
- IES Mechanical SylladbUploaded byRuby Smith
- Rev3 Bridges SummaryUploaded byAnonymous CPEha1db7U
- PS-HPUploaded byWon Jang
- S-000-1360-0001V_1 General Specification for PipingUploaded byLuong Anh
- Fluids Past Papers.pdfUploaded byAnushaBheenuck
- Mech3-8Cur_Syll.pdfUploaded byG0utham
- Numerical DeterminationUploaded byenrique.riera7693
- Dimensional Analysis Me.metuUploaded bysagarshiwakoti
- ME-220 Individual ProjectUploaded byMohamed Maher
- AIChE-155fUploaded byHarsha
- 8 Fundamental Equation of Fluid FlowUploaded byKit Meng Lim
- Relative Residence Time and Oscillatory Shear Index of NonUploaded bysunilpatil.043827
- Impact of a Jet.docxUploaded byConniefer Choi
- Storm Service Report 16-127-01Uploaded byJefferson Leonardo Cruz
- BA00301PEN_1916.pdfUploaded byarisprakesa
- Measure SheetUploaded bymtsh
- 4810b00nUploaded byRizky Muhammad
- HW_Ch14Uploaded byLadyminchin Dela Cruz
- Rocket Series 6Uploaded byvinodtiwari808754
- Ies SyllabusUploaded byMani Kumar
- file_14Uploaded bytata_77
- sistem irigasi rawa.pdfUploaded byUmar Dani Anshory

- Thermal Fluid ManualUploaded byAysun Güven
- lab3.docUploaded byAysun Güven
- Venturi Lab.pdfUploaded byAmirhosein605334
- Lab 2-Venturi MeterUploaded byNorsilah CLah
- Asee-midwest 0008 6430aaUploaded byAysun Güven
- ejcUploaded byAysun Güven
- FF-theory.pdfUploaded byAbdulrazzaqAL-Maliky
- Venturimeter LAB ReportUploaded byJames Roy
- 04 FLOW METERS.docUploaded byAysun Güven
- Formal Report 1Uploaded byAysun Güven
- presentation.pptxUploaded byAysun Güven
- NotesUploaded byAysun Güven
- Ashrae Handbook-hvac Systems and EquipmentUploaded byAzad Raza
- 574358_634225477945037500Uploaded byAysun Güven

- Rupture Disk EquationsUploaded byMehta Mehul
- IIFCO.xlsUploaded bySajal Kulshrestha
- ResEng Flame Ch6Uploaded byCaleb Jonatan Montes Velarde
- Production ForecastingUploaded bymanish.7417
- Physics-1- Molecular Physics and ThermodynamicsUploaded bynour
- Pure SubstancesUploaded byMemey La
- Dicussion Mass Correction[115]Uploaded byakmalina
- section 3 thermodynamicsUploaded bynkosana2
- PHE-06Uploaded byMishthi Mukherjee
- Thermodynamic CycleUploaded byjfdj_898jgkgf
- NR 220803 Fluid MechanicsUploaded bySrinivasa Rao G
- Slides 1Uploaded byalex dorik
- Incipient Cavitation of Freon-114 in a Tunnel VenturiUploaded byelilazar2
- Alcor - Introduction to Cyrogenics.pdfUploaded byDJSeidel
- Tutorium Refrigeration SolutionUploaded bywanpudin
- Dastek.pptUploaded byNur Hidayanti
- ME 200 - Lecture 7_BW_workingUploaded bycorey6
- Normal SchokUploaded byMuthuvel M
- XSteam Excel v2Uploaded byasifbabu
- Chapter 5 - Single Phase Systems NotesUploaded byMduduzi Magiva Mahlangu
- Calculation of Relief Rate Due to External Heat Input for Dense Phase FluidsUploaded byphantanthanh
- 3. VCR Cycle.pdfUploaded byDeepanguran j r
- OrificesUploaded byRoman Krautschneider
- FISIKA 1_KELAS B_GRUP 4(1)Uploaded byfarid
- List of Formula for Relief Valve Sizing Equation.docxUploaded byfatihah
- More on Phase Diagrams 2005Uploaded byCris Reven Gibaga
- Kinetic Particle TheoryUploaded byestherlimrh
- 4699023909751416325 - Thermo pptUploaded byFaizan Ahmed
- MA2003 Teaching Plan Sem1 2016-2017Uploaded bySamuel Xiao
- Chapter 4 States of Matter AS LEVEL NOTESUploaded byArsln