Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Assessment Identity
In society we have been assessing and evaluating each other, our skills, knowledge and development, for years.
This practice has continued, and been adapted into, the formal education seen in schools today. Assessment
involves gathering information about a students learning and progress, recording, interpreting and evaluating the
information, and then communicating the results back to the student and their parents (Whitton, Barker,
Nosworthy, Sinclair & Nanlohy, 2010; Woolfolk & Margetts, 2013). It is often referred to as the central aspect of
teaching and learning (Readman & Allen, 2013). There are three major approaches to assessment. Assessment for
learning involves using the information gathered in an assessment to inform future teaching and learning.
Assessment as learning involves using the information gathered in an assessment to aid students in becoming
conscious of their learning and progress. Assessment of learning involves using the information gathered in
assessment to summarise what a student knows at a given time (Krause, 2010; Readman & Allen, 2013; Woolfolk
& Margetts, 2013). Assessment in the classroom should include all three approaches to assessment. There are also
three different types of assessment. Diagnostic assessments are usually completed early in the teaching and
learning program, and are used to discover what knowledge and skills students have about a current topic.
Formative assessments are completed throughout the teaching and learning program and are used to aid planning
and adapt the teaching and learning program to suit the needs of the students. Summative assessments are usually
completed at the end of a teaching and learning program and involve collecting evidence to determine a students
progress and achievement (Readman & Allen, 2013; Whitton et al, 2010; Woolfolk & Margetts, 2013) [see AITSL
standard 5.1 (Education Services Australia, 2014)]. Often a teachers professional assessment identity is guided
by standards set by their country, state, or school, or their own personal experiences. It is important that teachers
develop their own specific professional assessment identity that will guide their assessment practices in their
classroom, and that they can modify and develop this as they gain experience.
Readman and Allen (2013) state assessment is central to learning. Teaching is a continuous cycle of planning,
assessment and learning activities, with the student in the centre (Butt, 2010). As teachers we have no
understanding of what a student knows and doesnt know, and therefore what to teach them. This is where
assessment comes in. It allows teachers to assess a students prior knowledge and skills to determine what the
student needs to learn. Once the student has been taught they are then assessed again to determine what they have
achieved, how effective the teaching was and what the student can now progress with. This knowledge allows for
the next set of learning activities and assessments to be planned, and the cycle continues (Butt, 2010). The
relationship between assessment and learning enables the teaching to be targeted at the students learning needs
and allows for assessment to be continuous and
therefore more meaningful to the student.
Assessment should be about supporting,
encouraging and engaging students in learning
(Readman & Allen, 2013). Through effective
feedback of assessment results students can be
encouraged, supported and motivated to continue
to learn (Readman & Allen, 2013). Using
assessment and planning strategies that engage
students, for example using an inquiry learning
program (Skamp, 2012) which follows the students
interests, motivates students to learn and develops
a healthy attitude towards assessment (Readman
& Allen, 2013). Overall assessments allow for both
teacher and student reflection on the teaching and
learning that is occurring so that future teaching
and learning can occur.
Teaching, Planning and Assessment Cycle Adapted from Butt (2010)
Assessment needs to be meaningful and worthwhile to both the student and the teacher. By
implementing the constructive alignment approach to teaching and learning tasks (Readman
& Allen, 2013), learning outcomes and assessments it can be assured that assessment is an
assimilated aspect of the teaching and learning process. The constructive alignment approach
is supported by the constructivist view of how children learn. This theory states that children
construct knowledge by using previous experiences to make sense of new experiences
(McDevitt et al, 2013; Readman & Allen, 2013; Woolfolk & Margetts, 2013). It is closely linked
to social constructivism, whereby children work together to construct meaning from shared
experiences (McDevitt et al, 2013; Readman & Allen, 2013; Woolfolk & Margetts, 2013).
Constructive alignment is also supported by the teaching, learning and assessment cycle, as
assessment becomes an integrated aspect of teaching and learning.
Assessment needs to be authentic, involving tasks that relate to real life situations (Readman
& Allen, 2013; Woolfolk & Margetts, 2013). Authentic assessment allows for students to apply
their knowledge to situations they may find outside of the classroom. This is also a positive
way to build up students motivation towards assessment. Assessment needs to be continuous,
and students should be given regular feedback on how they are progressing so that they can
reflect on their learning (Butt, 2010; Readman & Allen, 2013) [see AITSL standard 5.2
(Education Services Australia, 2014)]. Assessment can often be seen as meaningless to
students without constructive feedback (Butt, 2010; Readman & Allen, 2013; Whitton et al,
2010). Overall, assessment should be a highly integrated part of teaching and learning that
allows for both student and teacher reflection, involving authentic tasks and constructive
feedback to make it worthwhile for everyone involved.
EXAMPLE 1.1 Authentic Assessment
While I was undertaking my previous practicum I created a small diagnostic assessment to
determine the students understanding of fractions before planning several lessons to rectify
any misconceptions that were raised. My aim was the create questions that could apply to
students lives, making the assessment more meaningful and authentic to them. Below are a
couple of the questions I used for Year 4 focusing on the calculation of money:
1.Sally wanted to get an apple for the canteen. She had $2.30, and the apple cost $1.25. How
much money would she have received in change?
2.Adam went to the shops with $20. He wanted to buy two Pokemon figurines. One of the
figurines was $11.99. The other figurine was on sale for $5.99. Did Adam have enough
money to buy both figurines?
Assessment Literacy
Assessment literacy is an important principle in regards to assessment practices. It is essential
teachers have a large knowledge of assessment skills, attitudes and practices that they can
implement within their classrooms (Readman & Allen, 2013). Teachers with assessment
literacy often have better classroom practices (Popham, 2009) that assess students both
formally and informally (Whitton et al, 2010). It is a requirement that teachers are assessment
literate, and this includes using a variety of assessment strategies to assess students (Ewing,
2010) [see AITSL standard 5.1 (Education Services Australia, 2014)]. Examples of formal
assessments that are ideal to use in the classroom include portfolios, quizzes, and reports
(Readman & Allen, 2013). Examples of informal assessments that are ideal to use in the
classroom include observations and anecdotal records (McDevitt et al, 2013). Using a variety
of assessments within the classroom allow students to show their knowledge and skills in a
variety of different ways and contexts, therefore providing the teacher, student and parents
with a more accurate evaluation of the students development.