You are on page 1of 129

S.O.

S e - Voice For Justice - e-news weekly
Spreading the light of humanity & freedom
Editor: Nagaraja.M.R.. Vol.12..Issue.45........12/11/2016

Editorial : Unanswered Questions , Judges & Police
Judges , Police , public servants are NOT answering our following RTI Questions NOR admitting our PILs since years. Thereby , they
are aiding anti nationals , criminals. Who will prosecute these guilty judges , police & public servants ?
Traitors , Anti Nationals within judiciary & police , public service are causing more damage to our national unity , integrity and are a greater
threat to our nation than terrorists across the border. These tainted judges , police , public servants must be put behind bars first to secure
our nation.
Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.

Your’s ,
Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi.

1. PIL - CJI a Criminal ?
Case of Fence eating the crops ? Guard himself stealing ? Accountability of Judges a MUST

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice ,
# LIG 2 , No 761 , HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
.....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF
MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:
Our whole hearted respects to honest few in judiciary , parliament & public service. Our salutes to them , due to honest efforts of those few
noble persons only at least democracy is surviving in India.
A . "Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police ,
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
B . As per the preamble of the constitution of India all the people , all Indian citizens are equal in every respect , equally entitled to justice ,
equally responsible to uphold constitution . Only People , Citizens of India are supreme No Judges , No Ministers , etc are supreme. Judges ,
ministers , president etc are all public servants constitutionally mandated to SERVE the public , NOT to master over them. Even after 69
years of independence these judges , ministers have not come out of colonial hangover instead become worse treating general public as their
servants.
C . Every institution in india is directly or indirectly accountable to people , however judiciary alone is not transparent not giving accounts of it’s
actions to people.
D . Judges enjoy 5 star pay & perks , making merry at the cost of people’s money , public exchequer , but are not giving accounts of their
actions to people , not transparent to the public eye. They are not even honouring RTI applications seeking information about actions of
judges , because corrupt judges will be caught red handed.
E . Judges are not super humans nor super brains nor from moon or mars , they are ordinary mortals from the society around us and just like
us capable of doing good work as well falling prey to human lures like bribe , corruption , favoritism , etc.
F. Judges think they are sole custodians of constitution of india , in fact every citizen of india is a custodian of constitution of india.
G . Collegium of judges is nothing but a coterie , a MAFIA proof - unfit corrupt persons like dinakaran , another judge involved in mysore roost
resort sex scandal being selected by SCI collegium promoted to the apex court. It is just the tip of iceberg , behind the judicial veil of secrecy
many corrupt judges are hiding. Hereby , I challenge Honourable supreme court of india that subject to conditions I will bring to book corrupt
judges who are hiding behind the veil. Are you ready ?
H . When compared to some corrupt judges who are nothing but criminals , a drain , parasites on our public exchequer , society , the child
workers who are hard working earning less than rupees 32 a day are far better , great human beings.
I . Ofcourse when the court identifies that intentions of an act of parliament as unconstitutional , it has the right to strike it down to uphold the
supremacy of constitution. NJAC Act passed by parliament was in fact filling a legal vaccum about accountability & selection of judges and in
turn strengthening the constitution of india. But by striking down NJAC Act of government of india , supreme court of india is weakening
constitution of india , making contempt of parliament , constitution & all Indian citizens. If at all supreme court was really sincere it could have
suggested more alternatives for transparent , accountable judiciary with appropriate transparent provisions for guarding judicial
independence.
J . When government of india passed unconstitutional acts like land acquisition bill , special status to Kashmir , against uniform civil code
promoted unequal differing civil laws for various religion people and Bhopal gas victims act , nuclear energy act , etc , did it not dawn on
supreme court of india that it is the sole custodian of constitution ? then why not SCI strike down those unconstitutional parliamentary acts ?
K . It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard the constitutional rights of every Indian citizens . Since 25 years I am appealing
to SCI about issues concerning public welfare , national security , etc and as a result suffering injustices , my constitutional rights , human
rights are repeatedly violated but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made to it. Paradoxically , after these appeals for justice , I
have suffered more injustices , attempts on my life were made , physically assaulted , livelihood / jobs were denied , news publication closed ,
press accreditation denied , received threatening calls , blank calls, even to date rough elements follow us , rough elements scout near home
at mid night. Does not these indicate some ties between rough elements & SCI Judges ?
L . Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing unavailability. If at all information is not truly
available , why didn’t the CPIO TRANSFER rti application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective High
Courts , etc.
M . Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each employee including judges. If not on what basis they give
promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR can give infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking
that person to share infor mation ?
N . If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for
investigation to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into tens of pages
sometimes even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to
national security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only cover-up , WHY ? Are Judges & Police above Law ? Is Judge’s MAFIA at
play ?

O . The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to previous
RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by covering up judges & their crimes. Billions of
indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower middle class people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but
still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame to JUDGEs that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money , from
taxes paid by us still not do their constitutional duties properly.
P . When a Judge Himself Commits Crime , When a POLICE Himself robs , Murders ….
The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake it
is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same mistake. if a thief
steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-free under his patronage.
even if a police , public servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the aggrieved.
just think , if a judge himself that too apex court of the land itself commits crime - violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights & human rights of
public and obstructs the public from performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ?
it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power , criminals in public service to commit more crimes. that is exactly what is
happening in india. the educated public must raise to the occasion & peacefully , democratically must oppose this criminalization of judiciary ,
public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.
I have shown in the following attachment how justice is bought , purchased , manipulated in INDIA with actual cases. Just see the recent
examples of supreme court judges involved in sexual assault case & ROOST Resort Mysore Sex scandal involving judges , if any ordinary
fellow had committed the same crimes he would have been hauled over the coal fire. Just take another recent example of Prisoner Movie
actor sanjay dutt , TADA provisions were diluted by the judge to favour him and now he is getting parole week after week while the ordinary
convicts never get a single parole throught their sentence. What Brilliant Judges , what brilliant police sirji.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are Judges above Law & can go scot free ? Can judges cheat , rape , swindle others and go scot free without legal prosecution ? Why guilty
CJIs were not legally prosecuted in a fair & transparent manner ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , free expression & protection to life & liberty. Transparency , accountability in selection & functioning of Judges.

4. Averment:
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES &
FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects to them.
HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS –
WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT
SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT
OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS
FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND
CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN
DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN
JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
Half of former CJIs Corrupt :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/half-of-former-cjis-corrupt ,
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A – Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,
RTI & Land Golmaal
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
Why NOT 3rd degree Torture of Corrupt Doctors , Police & Judges
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.in/2015/10/why-not-3rd-degree-torture-of-doctors.html#links ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/3rd-degree-torture-by-doctors-police ,

Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi to answer the following questions
in public interest , for safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the
judiciary & police. Judges are not superior human beings , some of them have even became judges through devious means other than merit ,
integrity. Judges are public servants drawing salary & perks from public exchequer and accountable to public as any other common man is.
We salute our freedom fighters , military personnel & martyrs for all the sacrifices made by them. Let us build a strong , Secular , Democratic
India by getting rid off few corrupt elements , anti nationals , traitors among public servants , among judiciary & among police who are greater
threat to India’s unity & integrity than Pakistani terrorists or chinese military.
Information input forms part of process of one’s expression. One’s expression in any forms – written , oral , etc becomes information input to
the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information & Expression are inseparable parts & form lifeline of a democracy. That is the
reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a person’s right to expression
is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.
In a democracy , people have a right to know how the public servants are functioning. However till date public servants are hiding behind the
veil of Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public servants are
hiding their own corruption , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public servants. However
the recent delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under RTI purview & bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.
Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India , DG & IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The
information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past ,
present continuing injustices meted out to millions of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of Indian judges , police & public
servants . The information we sought would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals in public service. The information we are seeking
are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service & strengthens
our national security , national unity & integrity.
Hereby , i do request the honourable supreme court of india , for a Supreme Court monitored CBI Enquiry into this whole issue as karnataka
police are helpless , they don't have legal powers to prosecute high & mighty , constitutional functionaries. They have not even enquired the
guilty VVIPs even once however Under pressure from higher-ups they repeatedly called me the complainant to police station took statements
from me all for closing the files.
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none of them were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see how
careless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to make public all the proceedings of supreme court collegiums and
correspondence between SCI , President’s office & government of india regarding selection of judges. To make public all the eligibility criteria
followed for selection of judges and who filled what criteria , who didn’t fill which criteria and the final ranking.
(iii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india and to protect the constitutional rights of all
Indian citizens including mine.
(iv) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india , to protect the constitutional rights , human
rights of all Indian citizens including mine and to enable , facilitate all Indian citizens to perform their Fundamental Duties as per constitution.
(v) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
Read : https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---writ-of-mandamus-1 ,

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Date : 29th October 2015………………………………Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.
Place : Mysuru India……………………………………Petitioner in person

2. PIL – Why NOT 3rd degree Torture , Death Sentence to Corrupt Judges , Police & Doctors
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants , corrupt judges ,
corrupt police & corrupt doctors.
2. some unfit people based on their connections , money power , etc everything else other than MERIT , HONESTY , INTEGRITY have
become Judges , Police & Doctors. These unfit people have used criminal means for their selection and indulge in crimes by selling their
official duties for a price. Recent example : Delhi Judge Selection Examination , KPSC & VYAPAM scams.
3. These unfit judges declare rich criminals as innocents & send innocents to jail for a price. These unfit police leave criminals , file B report to
close cases , change charge sheet , change path of investigation / prosecution , fit innocents in cases using 3rd degree torture methods ,
does contract / supari killing in the name of encounters , etc all for a price. These corrupt doctors give false post mortem reports , misguiding
medico legal opinions and illegally advice police how to torture a human being without leaving any evidences.
4. Honest few in judiciary , police , health services & public services are just mute spectators , they are not raising their voice , not legally
prosecuting their corrupt colleagues. It also amounts to corroboration & a crime.
5 . Due to these type of match fixing by Judges & police many innocents are serving jail sentence behind bars & some have been hanged ,
while the rich crooks are roaming free.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are doctors , police & Judges above law ? Can Doctors , Judges & Police Commit crimes , go scot free ? Can Judges & Police intentionally
neglect ( to aid criminals ) their duties , while shamelessly drawing tens of thousands of rupees monthly salary & perks on time without fail
from public exchequer.
Is it not the duty of doctor to heal the pain of a human being rather than give pain to a human being ? is a doctor legally authorized to torture
or aid torture of a human being ?
Is it not the duty of police to uphold our law , protect public , common man rather than illegally fixing them in cases ? are police legally
authorized to subject a human being to torture ? Are not police responsible for life , health & safety of persons under their custody ?
Is it not the duty of a judge to uphold law , protect public ? is it not his duty to check the veracity of claims , reports by police , doctors giving
fake evidences , reports ? is it not duty of a judge to protect life , health & safety of persons under judicial custody or serving prison sentence
based on judicial orders ?

3. Grounds:
All Indian citizens are guaranteed with fundamental rights of life , liberty , health , safety , equitable justice under constitution of india.
All Indian citizens are guaranteed with human rights of life , liberty , health , safety , equitable justice under constitution of india as india is also
a signatory of UN Human Rights Charter.
All Human Beings are guaranteed with human rights of life , liberty , health , safety , equitable justice by virtue of their birth itself irrespective
of any constitutional bodies or statutory bodies.
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of corrupt public servants , corrupt doctors , corrupt judges , corrupt police. Request for supreme
court orders to doctors , judges & police to perform their duties properly.

4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.

b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. to constitute impartial statutory investigation committee comprising NGOs , press , police & judiciary at taluk levels to investigate cases of
3rd degree torture by law enforcement agencies . Essentially these committees must include a member from victim’s side during investigation
& prosecution. The state government must bear the cost of it’s functioning including transportation , food , remuneration at actual rate.
d. In the cases of 3rd degree torture , fake encounters , there must be provision for 2nd , 3rd medical examination , medical opinion by
doctors appointed by investigation committee.
e. when government doctors are caught giving false post mortem reports , false medical opinions they must be dismissed from service and
legally prosecuted for abetting torture , attempt to murder or murder as the case may be.
f. when police , jail staff or law enforcing personnel are caught for physically & mentally torturing a human being , an under trial or convict they
must be dismissed from service and legally prosecuted for abetting torture , attempt to murder or murder as the case may be.
g. when a judge is caught for giving biased judicial order without examining the veracity of evidences , statements , reports given by police ,
law enforcement personnel , doctors , when a judge bases his judicial orders on forced confessions taken from under trials , convicts by 3rd
degree torture methods , those judges must be dismissed from service and legally prosecuted for abetting torture , attempt to murder or
murder as the case may be.
h. when a judge fails to protect life , health , safety of a prisoner , whether under trial or convict , those judges must be dismissed from service
and legally prosecuted for abetting torture , attempt to murder or murder as the case may be.
I . as 3rd degree torture , fake encounters are pre meditated , cold blooded murders , heinous crimes , they are rarest of rare cases and
judges , police , law enforcement officials , doctors abetting , executing 3rddegree torture , fake encounters must be hanged till death. They
are worse than KASAB.
j. the state government must give government job to one from victim’s family and must pay compensation at actual living cost levels to that
family .
k. the government must recover that compensation cost from salary , pension , properties of guilty judges , police , etc as land arrears.
l. to legally prosecute under murder charges STF police , forest officials who were responsible for 3rd degree torture , encounter deaths of
tribals in MM Hills , Karnataka during operation nab veerappan.
m. to legally prosecute under murder charges judges who failed to protect the lives of under trials , convicts in operation nab veerappan.
n. to legally prosecute under murder charges government doctors who gave false post mortem reports , false medical opinions about fake
encounters , 3rd degree torture of tribals in operation nab veerappan.
o . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 10th December 2015 ………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India………………………….PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

3. PIL Before Supreme Court of USA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF USA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice ,
# LIG 2 , No 761 , HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State , India and Global American Citizens
.....Petitioners

Versus

H.E.Honourable President of USA & Others
....Respondents

Petition under BILL OF RIGHTS and Human Rights Charter
To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of USA and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the United States of America

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
a. Inequality in society , unjust laws , unjust enforcement of law is a breeding ground for frustrated youths , criminal elements , naxalites ,
terrorists. Vested foreign & domestic interests manipulate these inequalities in society to advance their vested selfish interests using these
frustrated , disillusioned youths as pawns in their power game.
b. Police & other law enforcement agencies use 3rd degree torture against people suspected of petty crimes , whereas they don’t use 3rd
degree torture against their own corrupt colleagues , Judges who aid underworld dons , big criminals earning bribe money to the tune of
Millions of dollars. In many cases of Police corruption , judicial corruption even legal prosecution is not at all done.
c. Whole MUSLIM community is painted as a terror & suspected world over. They don’t easily get jobs , rented houses , loans , etc everybody
suspects them. If you go by numbers there are many Christian terrorists in spain , Nicaragua , cuba , Ireland , etc and most importantly
masterminds of terrorism , people who sowed the seeds of terrorism in Middle East , Asia , else where are all CHRISTIANS. Does that mean
all Christians are terrorists. True most of the terrorists come from muslim community , however there are also common folk like us in the
muslim community who yearn for a honest , simple living. There are good people in all communities as there are bad people.
d. Crime is a crime , whether big or small. There is discrimination in cell allotment , labour hours , provision of food , visitors facility between
ordinary accused & rich accused persons , ordinary criminals and rich criminals within jail.
e. The police & Presiding Judge in the case are responsible for health , safety of persons both in their custody as well as safety of witnesses
outside. Many persons are subjected to 3rd degree torture while in custody , some people have died in lock up and witnesses were
threatened , murdered outside , but the respective police , judges are not legally prosecuted for murder charges.
f. The suspects who were acquitted of charges under anti terror laws & other criminal charges , who went through hell , whose family
suffered , are not paid any compensation for wrongful detention by courts of law nor the police who were responsible for wrong detention are
legally prosecuted for leveling false charges.
g. US Presidents and US government in league with US based MNCs successively poked it’s nose in the affairs of other sovereign nations ,
created rift in the peaceful countries , sowed the seeds of terrorism , aided & supported terrorists in all respects. US is a heartless butcher ,
but now preaching non violence , peace to the world.
h. US government always practices double standards take for instance industrial accident done by BP oil off US coast , US Government
extracted compensation to the maximum extent. Where as US based MNC Union carbide (now DOW Chemicals) did man slaughter in india
at Bhopal , still US government is not ordering the guilty company to pay compensation.
i. USA which is a hugely industrialized nation with population enjoying opulent life style has caused more damage to the environment resulting
in climate change. As the worst destroyer of ecology , US government is bound is bound to pay more for the repair of environment. However
US government is forcing other backward countries to share it’s own burden.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are Presidents of United States of America above Law ? Are US police , judges , other public servants above law ?
What Legal Rights Presiden of USA , US Military , US Police & US Judges have to successively violate the human rights of citizens of other
countries both within USA & outside.
how much US resources were spent from US TREASURY , to finance terrorist outfits , military juntas in other sovereign nations ?
is not Al-queda , Taliban creations of USA ?

did September 9 / 11 WTC attack truly happened by hijacked airplane or was it planned by US authorities ? see
http://www.neiu.edu/~ayjamess/hmmm.htm#Main
is racial profiling , profiling a particular community & suspecting all the muslims as terror suspects , right?
if it is right , the creators of such terrorist outfits – past presidents of USA – who were Christians makes it logical to assume whole of our
Christian community as terror suspect ?
is not use of 3rd degree torture on all type of suspects in US prisons & in the prisons of US allied countries at the behest of US authorities ,
right ? is it not violation of human rights & US laws ?
did US find any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq , which was the main reason for US attacking Iraq ?
why not US authorities use scientific interrogation techniques like polygraph , lie detector tests instead of inhuman 3rd degree torture on terror
suspects & suspects in other criminal cases ?
what legal right our President of USA have , to illegally spend billions of our dollars on inhuman , illegal acts of terrorism , military coup ,
creation , aiding & abetting of terrorists , etc , in other sovereign nations ? while we are suffering from loss of jobs ,loss of home due to natural
calamities , etc ?
Inspite of repeated appeals for justice JUDGES of SUPREME COURT of USA are mum and not taking action against terror presidents. Is it
because they owe their elevation to the highest judicial post to the US president or is it a survival act ?
Crux , Foundation of all religions is humanity , kindness & universal brotherhood. It is the preachers who misrepresent it. Terrorism created ,
aided , abetted by anybody is inhuman & wrong . Terrorism is creation of power hungry , selfish people & they must be legally punished .
Hereby , we appeal to the honorable supreme court of USA to legally prosecute Previous PRESIDENTS OF USA in the last 4 decades , for
crimes of terror , as per the present US anti-terror laws.

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , free expression & protection to life & liberty of all American citizens as per BILL of RIGHTS. Transparency ,
accountability in functioning of US President , US police & US Judiciary .

4. Averment:
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY US Presidents US JUDGES , US POLICE , US PUBLIC SERVANTS
responsible for TERROR Crimes committed in USA & Outside USA with support from US government.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of USA to consider this as a PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION for : “writ of Mandamus” and
to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to uphold the constitution of USA and to protect the constitutional rights of all
American citizens.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to legally prosecute pas presidents of USA and Incumbent President of
Government of United States of America for Terror Crimes , torture of innocents in Guantanamo , renditions , etc.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to initiate legal prosecution of police , law enforcement officials , judges
responsible for 3rd degree torture of innocents , lock-up deaths , fake encounters and to pay compensation to victims and to recover money
from personal properties of those guilty police , judges.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to order the jail authorities to stop classification of prisoners and to stop
discrimination of prisoners.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to order police & presiding judge of a case to ensure protection of life of
accused , witnesses in the case , complainant of the case.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to order DOW Chemicals to pay full compensation to victims of Bhopal Gas
Tragedy in India and initiate criminal prosecution of responsible company executives.
Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to order government of USA to pay towards the damages it has done to the
environment.

Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of USA to order government of USA to spend tax payer’s money on food safety , health
care , joblessness of American citizens than on sponsoring terrorism in other countries.
to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Date : 31st January 2016………………………………Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.
Place : Mysuru India…………………………………… Petitioner in person

4. PIL - India , Pakistan , USA sponsoring TERRORISM
Double speak of Government

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice ,
# LIG 2 , No 761 , HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
.....Petitioner

Versus

H.E.Honourable President of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF
MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion
Justices of the Supreme Court of India. The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
Our whole hearted respects to honest few in judiciary , parliament & public service. Our salutes to them , due to honest efforts of those few
noble persons only , at least democracy is surviving in India.
A . "Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.

Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police ,
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned police , judges fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals &
Freebooters.
B . As per the preamble of the constitution of India all the people , all Indian citizens are equal in every respect , equally entitled to justice ,
equally responsible to uphold constitution . Only People , Citizens of India are supreme No Judges , No Ministers , No Police , No Military , etc
are supreme. Judges , ministers , president , Police , Military etc are all public servants constitutionally mandated to SERVE the public , NOT
to master over them. Even after 69 years of independence these police , judges , ministers have not come out of colonial hangover instead
become worse treating general public as their servants.
C. Inequality in society , unjust laws , unjust enforcement of law is a breeding ground for frustrated youths , criminal elements , naxalites ,
terrorists. Vested foreign & domestic interests manipulate these inequalities in society to advance their vested selfish interests using these
frustrated , disillusioned youths as pawns in their power game.
D. I will list below various types of inequities existing in present day india even after nearly 69 years of independence.
E. People of Jammu & Kashmir , North Eastern states of India are governed by different set of laws than the rest of india.
F. There are different set of property laws , succession laws , marriage laws , etc for people of different religions.
G. Judges committing crimes against women , indulging in corruption, etc can not be legally prosecuted & punished.
H. Even after 69 years of independence , still dalits , tribal people are suffering & backward.
I. Police & other law enforcement agencies use 3rd degree torture against people suspected of petty crimes , whereas they don’t use 3rd
degree torture against their own corrupt colleagues , Judges who aid underworld dons , big criminals earning bribe money to the tune of lakhs
, crores of rupees. In many cases of Police corruption , judicial corruption even legal prosecution is not at all done.
J. Whole MUSLIM community is painted as a terror & suspected world over. They don’t easily get jobs , rented houses , loans , etc everybody
suspects them. True most of the terrorists come from muslim community , however there are also common folk like us in the muslim
community who yearn for a honest , simple living. There are good people in all communities as there are bad people.
K. Anti Terror Laws like TADA , AFSPA , etc are used with impunity without reasoning even on old people , children and whoever questions the
police , military for their actions. Ideally these laws should cover those aiding terrorists , anti nationals. However certain celebrities , police
officials themselves who hobnob with terrorists , underworld and aid their terror activities are not covered by these terror laws.
L. Constitution of India has not authorized , given powers to anybody to use 3rd degree torture against suspects , it is illegal & inhuman.
Police selectively use 3rd degree torture against suspects , innocents from poor , ordinary back grounds to extract false confessions.
Whereas they don’t use 3rd degree torture against real time , big time rich & influential criminals instead they get many facilities in the jail.
M. Crime is a crime , whether big or small. There is discrimination in cell allotment , labour hours , provision of food , visitors facility between
ordinary accused & rich accused persons , ordinary criminals and rich criminals within jail.
N. The police & Presiding Judge in the case are responsible for health , safety of persons both in their custody as well as safety of witnesses
outside. Many persons are subjected to 3rd degree torture while in custody , some people have died in lock up and witnesses were
threatened , murdered outside , but the respective police , judges are not legally prosecuted for murder charges.
O. The suspects who were acquitted of charges under anti terror laws & other criminal charges , who went through hell , whose family
suffered , are not paid any compensation for wrongful detention by courts of law nor the police who were responsible for wrong detention are
legally prosecuted for leveling false charges.
P. Tribal people who are inhabitants of forest , who are living in harmony with ecology , protecting forests since centuries are evicted by
authorities in the name of protecting forests. Same authorities give vast tracts of forest land on platter to big multinational corporations , who
in turn destroy ecology , environment.
Q. Dalits , backward class people when construct small temporary hutments on government land , those hutments are immediately razed
down , dalits evicted by police , authorities. When rich crooks illegally encroach vast tracts of government lands , lakes , canals , build huge
townships , business complexes earning crores of rupees , no action to raze down illegal buildings , evict encroachers is taken by police ,
authorities. Sadly , government is in process of enacting laws to legalize those illegal structures belonging to rich crooks.
R. Government of india to fight the proxy war of cunning , coward external enemies is indulging in the same cowardly tactics of aiding &
abetting terrorism , by the way killing many innocent civilians. Instead GOI must give a befitting military reply to enemy.
S. GOI is responsible for creation , funding , training of SALWA JUDUM , to counter naxalism in india. GOI is responsible for creation , funding
, training of counter terrorist out fits in north east india , jammu Kashmir , Pakistan and responsible for creation , funding , training of LTTE ,
Tamil terrorist outfits in srilanka. GOI poked it’s nose in the internal affairs of east Pakistan which led to creation of separate nation
Bangladesh. All these led to loss of thousands of innocent lives , GOI didn’t bother to compensate them.
T. In india , we have many unattended domestic problems , half of our population is barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day. GOI
instead of properly using the precious tax payer’s money to solve domestic problems , squandering them on funding terror outfits. No legal
prosecution of GOI Ministers responsible for these terror acts taken till date.

U. Actions were taken with impunity against sikh terrorists but in the same way actions were not taken against those responsible for sikh
massacre in delhi , else where.
V. Actions were taken with impunity against terrorists responsible for burning of Sabarmati express train were taken , but in the same way
actions were not taken against those responsible for Godhra riots in Gujarath.
W. Actions were taken with impunity against terrorists responsible for Bombay bomb blasts were taken , but in the same way actions were not
taken against those responsible for Bombay riots afterwards.
X. Many industrialists are contributing money to criminals , but no action by GOI to stop it taken till date.
Y. Government of Pakistan , china are aiding terrorists , separatists , Maoists in india. Government of USA is also indirectly aiding terrorists ,
separatists , Maoists in india through Pakistan.
Z. Whoever raises his voice against the illegalities of authorities are silenced in many ways by authorities. He will be fitted in fake cases , his
livelihood snatched away , courts with weird interpretations of law will punish him , slap contempt charges on him sending him to jail. If he is
spilling out more TRUTH he will be neutralized , murdered by intelligence agencies with the aid of criminals. Many whistle blowers , RTI
Activists , Journalists , Human Rights Activists , Crusaders have died mysteriously this way. No compensation to victims , no legal prosecution
of authorities responsible for it till date.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are all Indian citizens really equal ? Are police , judges , ministers above law ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , free expression & protection to life & liberty. Transparency , accountability in functioning of police & Judiciary .

4. Averment:
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES , POLICE , PUBLIC SERVANTS responsible for above mentioned
injustices.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to enforce uniform civil code for all Indian citizens.
(iii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india and to protect the constitutional rights of all
Indian citizens including mine.
(iv) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india , to protect the constitutional rights , human
rights of all Indian citizens including mine and to enable , facilitate all Indian citizens to perform their Fundamental Duties as per constitution.
(v) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to annul legal immunity privileges given to judges of india and make the
judges accountable for all their actions.
(vi) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to annul Article 370 of our constitution giving special status to jammu Kashmir
state and also annul laws giving special status to north eastern states of india.
(vii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to initiate legal prosecution of police , law enforcement officials , judges
responsible for 3rd degree torture of innocents , lock-up deaths , fake encounters and to pay compensation to victims and to recover money
from personal properties of those guilty police , judges.
(viii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to order the jail authorities to stop classification of prisoners and to stop
discrimination of prisoners.
(ix) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to order police & presiding judge of a case to ensure protection of life of
accused , witnesses in the case , complainant of the case.

(x) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to order GOI & state governments to give reservation , other facilities to
dalits , backward class people in turn. Then facilities will be available to wide section of dalits instead of a creamy , affluent dalit family
repeatedly getting benefits for generations , while hundreds of dalit families don’t get benefit even once in their life time.
(xi) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to order GOI & state governments to protect the forest rights of tribals over the
forest they dwell in. To legally prosecute illegal encroachers of forest , rich crooks.
(xii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to annul the land acts enacted by various state governments which goes on
to legalize illegal encroachment of government lands , lakes , canals , etc by rich crooks. To legally prosecute the illegal encroachers , rich
crooks.
(x) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to legally prosecute ministers , public servants of GOI & state governments
who aided, abetted terrorism , who created SALWA JUDUM , who aided tamil terror outfits in srilanka , who created counter terror outfits in
NEFA , J&K , Pakistan , who aided Bangladeshi separatists. To pay compensation to victims of those terrorism and to recover money from
properties of guilty ministers , guilty public servants.
(xi) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to order GOI & state governments to take impartial action against all the
criminals responsible for terror acts , riots , bomb blasts irrespective of which party they belong to or which community they belong to or if he
is a celebrity or ordinary person.
(xii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to order GOI to give a befitting military reply to enemies , crush the intruders ,
terrosists , naxalites but not to indulge in cowardly proxy war which kills innocent civilians.
(xiii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to order GOI & state governments to pay compensation to victims who were
wrongly detained , jailed by police , authorities under anti terror laws , criminal laws. To recover money from properties , salary , pension of
guilty police & judges.
(xiv) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to order RBI , GOI & state governments to rigorously monitor transactions of
commercial firms , industries for black money transactions and to keep a tab on auditors , company secretaries who aid those criminals. To
make public details of guilty industrialists , to legally prosecute them and to recover money siphoned off from them.
(xv) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on
the facts and in the circumstances of the case to remove inequalities prevailing in our law , in law enforcement & in our society as mentioned
above. By which, causes of origin for naxalism , terrorism can be erased.
(xvi) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to declare Pakistan , china & USA as terror states and order GOI to deal
accordingly with those nations and to make an appeal to UNITED NATIONS , INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE to take action against
Pakistan , china & USA for their terror crimes in india.
(xvii) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Date : 23rd January 2016………………………………Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.
Place : Mysuru India…………………………………… Petitioner in person

5. PIL – Mercy Death Plea to Honourable Chief Justice of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.
The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.
MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for
power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the
House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved
right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
2. As a result of fighting for public causes , public good I have individually sufferred numerous injustices and still sufferring injustices. My
newspaper publication was illegally closed down , my web news paper not given with press accredition , my job oppurtunities in RBI Note
press , PES Engineering college , NIE Engineering college , Mysore district court , etc snatched away illegally , I was beaten up , attempts on
my life were made even after bringing threats to my life were brought to notice of supreme court of india. See how duty duty conscious our
supreme court judges are ? all these sufferrings for public causes I have raised & to silence me.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are police & Judges above law ? Can Judges & Police Comitt crimes , go scot free ? Can Judges & Police intentionally neglect ( to aid
criminals ) their duties , while shamelessly drawing tens of thousands of rupees monthly salary & perks on time without fail from public
exchequer.

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of corrupt public servants , corrupt judges , corrupt police. Request for supreme court orders to
judges & police to perform their duties properly.

4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
Read the actual case details at following web pages involving judges & police in crimes. The criminal network , corruption net work , MAFIA of
Judges & Police is strong , whenever one of their members is accussed , others white wash , bury the case in the name of investigation.
Transparent , impartial investigation as in the case of common man is not at all done.
We respect the honest few in judiciary , police & public service. Those honest few are also becoming parties to crime by becoming silent , by
not doing their duties , by not arresting their corrupt colleagues. Their by they are covering up crime & aiding criminals to commit more crimes.
Due to these type of corrupt judges & corrupt police innocents, commoners land in jails and some are even hanged for crimes not commited
by them , while the rich crooks roam free.
The corrupt judges & corrupt police are shameless people , parasites in our society. They take tens of thousands of rupees monthly salary &
perks from our money , tax payer’s money and still don’t do their duties properly. The judges give sermons , judgements running into
hundreds of pages when their own folk is in the dock , caught for crimes they intentionally fall silent. The police use filthy language , use 3rd

degree torture against commoners , innocents when their own folk is in the dock , caught for crimes , dacoity they don’t use filthy language
nor they use 3rd degree torture . Even in fit cases where alleged Judges & Police can be given death sentence , they are spared , why ?
Please don’t send police again to my home neither refer my case to police. They don’t have practical powers to inquire high & mighty judges.
They will come to my home , call me to police station , will take a statement from me & will close the file by sending it to head quarters. This
has happened previously number of times. If you are honest in intent , Please constitute an impartial , transparent empowered Inquiry
committee to deal this case.
The judges , police & public servants intentionally delay taking action in cases and withhold giving information in time , so that evidences are
buried in time , gets destroyed and time lapse occurs resulting in the case becoming time barred. Some of PILs submitted by us are 20 years
old concerning national security and I was also eligible for free legal aid at the time of application - still the judges & police didn’t take
appropriate action however they shamelessly took thousands of rupees salary , perks from our money. Till date no justice in sight instead
more injustices meted out to me as a result of this crusade. THESE INCAPABLE JUDGES & POLICE ARE UNFIT FOR THE POSITIONS
THEY OCCUPY , IF THEY CANN’T PROVIDE JUSTICE ATLEAST GIVE ME MERCY DEATH.
I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to
police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must
be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station
for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits , rich crooks , criminals even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high
& mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to
my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the
jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake
charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.
If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If
anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents or to my family members - In such case Chief Justice of India together with the
jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as
compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be
donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property ,
etc of guilty police officials , Judges , public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see howcareless
our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which
are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. To legally prosecute the public servants who are responsible for not giving press accreditation to my web news papers , myself as a
journalist and responsible for closure of my news papers.
d. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s RPG Cables Ltd , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of criminals responsible for
late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
e. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s PES College of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of criminals
responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
f. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s National Institute of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of criminals
responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
g. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s Reserve Bank Note Nudran Pvt Ltd , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of
criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
h. To legally prosecute authorities of Mysore District Courts & Bangalore District Courts , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest
of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
i. To legally prosecute persons responsible for attempts on my life.
j. to legally prosecute judges , police & CBI officials responsible for cover-up of late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
K . To provide protection to life , liberty , livelihood , jobs of me , my family members & dependants.

l. To reopen , reinvestigate assassination case of Late PM Rajiv Gandhi.
m. To legally prosecute authorities of supreme court of india for not answering show cause notice issued to them and order them to answer
the show cause notice as well as RTI questions given to them by the petitioner.
n. To conduct an impartial , transparent supreme court monitored enquiry into cases mentioned by me.
o. To admit all PILs filed by me in larger public interest.
p. To initiate criminal prosecution of public servants , police & judges who are trying to cover up crime and criminals by denying me
information , by not taking action on our appeals , PILs.
q. To award me a compensation of RUPEES TWO CRORES towards the losses I have sufferred and injustices I am still going through for
fighting for public causes.
r. To recover compensation amount as land arrears from guilty police , guilty judges & guilty public servants individually.
s. To permit me to work in the investigation team , to assist them in investigation subject to conditions .
t . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
u. THESE INCAPABLE JUDGES & POLICE ARE UNFIT FOR THE POSITIONS THEY OCCUPY , IF THEY CANN’T PROVIDE JUSTICE
ATLEAST GIVE ME MERCY DEATH.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 16th September 2015 ………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………………...PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

6.. PIL – Justice to Human Rights Activist
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
2. As a result of fighting for public causes , public good I have individually sufferred numerous injustices and still sufferring injustices. My
newspaper publication was illegally closed down , my web news paper not given with press accredition , my job oppurtunities in RBI Note
press , PES Engineering college , NIE Engineering college , Mysore district court , etc snatched away illegally , I was beaten up , attempts on
my life were made even after bringing threats to my life were brought to notice of supreme court of india. See how duty duty conscious our
supreme court judges are ? all these sufferrings for public causes I have raised & to silence me.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are police & Judges above law ? Can Judges & Police Comitt crimes , go scot free ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of corrupt public servants , corrupt judges , corrupt police.

4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see howcareless
our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which
are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. To legally prosecute the public servants who are responsible for not giving press accreditation to my web news papers , myself as a
journalist and responsible for closure of my news papers.
d. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s RPG Cables Ltd , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of criminals responsible for
late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
e. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s PES College of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of criminals
responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
f. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s National Institute of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of criminals
responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
g. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s Reserve Bank Note Mudran Pvt Ltd , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of
criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
h. To legally prosecute authorities of Mysore District Courts & Bangalore District Courts , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest
of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

i. To legally prosecute persons responsible for attempts on my life.
j. to legally prosecute judges , police & CBI officials responsible for cover-up of late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
K . To provide protection to life , liberty , livelihood , jobs of me , my family members & dependants.
l. To reopen , reinvestigate assassination case of Late PM Rajiv Gandhi.
m. To legally prosecute authorities of supreme court of india for not answering show cause notice issued to them and order them to answer
the show cause notice as well as RTI questions given to them by the petitioner.
n. To conduct an impartial , transparent supreme court monitored enquiry into cases mentioned by me.
o. To admit all PILs filed by me in larger public interest.
p. To initiate criminal prosecution of public servants , police & judges who are trying to cover up crime and criminals by denying me
information , by not taking action on our appeals , PILs.
q. To award me a compensation of RUPEES TWO CRORES towards the losses I have sufferred and injustices I am still going through for
fighting for public causes.
r. To recover compensation amount as land arrears from guilty police , guilty judges & guilty public servants individually.
s. To permit me to work in the investigation team , to assist them in investigation subject to conditions .
t . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 23rd July 2015 ………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India…………………….PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

7. PIL – Legal Prosecution of Government officials , Public Servants involved in Reliance Scams
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice ,
# LIG 2 , No 761 , HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
.....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Cabinet Secretary , PMO , Government of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF
MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,

Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
Our whole hearted respects to honest few in judiciary , parliament & public service. Our salutes to them , due to honest efforts of those few
noble persons only at least democracy is surviving in India.
A . "Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police ,
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
B . Loot of natural resources , telecom spectrum & public property in India and illegal aid to those criminals by government officials.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are government officials , telecom , petroleum , finance department officials , police & revenue officials who aided loot , above Law & can go
scot free ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , legal prosecution & punishment of guilty government officials and public servants .

4. Averment:
Give what action has been taken by government of india or state governments or other statutory bodies against reliance industries for it’s
irregularities in telecom , oil sector , etc.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to legally prosecute guilty officials mentioned in the above said report.
(iii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india , to protect natural resources and to protect
the constitutional rights of all Indian citizens including mine.
(iv) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to immediately keep all government officials mentioned in the above said
report under suspension from service & to take necessary steps to protect all type of evidences.
(v) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Date : 28th November 2015………………………………Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.
Place : Mysuru India…………………………………………..Petitioner in person

8. PIL – Legal Prosecution of officials involved in Bellary Mining Scam
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice ,
# LIG 2 , No 761 , HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
.....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF
MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
Our whole hearted respects to honest few in judiciary , parliament & public service. Our salutes to them , due to honest efforts of those few
noble persons only at least democracy is surviving in India.
A . "Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police ,
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
B . Loot of natural resources in Karnataka state and illegal aid to those criminals by government officials. Read Karnataka Lokayukta Mining
scam report .

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are forest officials , police & revenue officials who aided bellary mining loot , above Law & can go scot free ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , legal prosecution & punishment of guilty police , revenue , forest officials.

4. Averment:
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS MENTIONED IN THE KARNATAKA
LOKAYUKTA REPORT submitted by Justice Santosh Hegde & Shri.U.V.Singh ABOUT BELLARY MINING SCAM. IF NOT WHY ? REASONS
THEROF.
How many guilty government officials mentioned in the above report got promotions , continuing in service making it easy for them to tamper
evidences ?
What action against public servants , officials who are hushing up the case & protecting the guilty ?
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none of them were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see how
careless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to legally prosecute guilty officials mentioned in the above said report.
(iii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india , to protect natural resources and to protect
the constitutional rights of all Indian citizens including mine.
(iv) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to immediately keep all government officials mentioned in the above said
report under suspension from service & to take necessary steps to protect all type of evidences.
(v) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Date : 04th November 2015………………………………Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.
Place : Mysuru India……………………………………Petitioner in person

9. PIL - Bhopal Gas Leak
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice ,
# LIG 2 , No 761 , HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
.....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Seceretary , Government of Madhya Pradesh & Others
...Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 21 , ARTICLE 14 – 16 , ARTICLE 21 , seeking Justice , compensation and for issuance of WRIT of
MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
Our whole hearted respects to honest few in judiciary , parliament & public service. Our salutes to them , due to honest efforts of those few
noble persons only at least democracy is surviving in India.
A . "Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police ,
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
B . As per the preamble of the constitution of India all the people , all Indian citizens are equal in every respect , equally entitled to justice ,
equally responsible to uphold constitution . Only People , Citizens of India are supreme No Judges , No Ministers , etc are supreme. Judges ,
ministers , president etc are all public servants constitutionally mandated to SERVE the public , NOT to master over them. Even after 69
years of independence these judges , ministers have not come out of colonial hangover instead become worse treating general public as their
servants.
C . Union carbide plant ( UCIL ) was unsafe and indulged in unsafe work practices , maintenance was inadequate.
D . Even a local journalist through a news publication publicly brought to notice of authorities concerned perils of Bhopal gas plant , years
before the Bhopal gas leak , industrial accident occurred . He forewarned.
E . Inspite of forewarning Madhya Pradesh Industries , Factories Inspectorate departments failed to take adequate steps , allowed the UCIL
plant to run uninterrupted.
F . Inspite of forwarning Madhya Pradesh state pollution control board failed to take adequate steps , allowed the UCIL plant to run
uninterrupted.
G . Madhya Pradesh state government side by side with UCIL management is equally responsible for the Bhopal gas leak case. It failed to do
it’s statutory duties and to prevent disaster in time.
H . Even after the disaster took place , Madhya Pradesh state government and Government of India instead of legally prosecuting Mr.Warren
Anderson ( Head of UCIL) who was in custody , illegally , brazenly helped him to run away from law.
I . Even after the disaster took place , Madhya Pradesh state government failed to legally arrest and prosecute union carbide top executives.
J . Union Carbide USA head quarters wanted lucrative Indian market , cheap Indian resources , cheap Indian labor , lax Indian laws but didn’t
have the decency to respect Indian laws.
K . Government of India , Government of Madhya Pradesh failed to seek extradition of Mr. Warren Anderson and other top Union Carbide
executives from USA. They failed to get right cost & compensation from US Corporate giant & US government.
L . The government of USA and Supreme Court of USA is practicing double standards , just see the example of BP oil spillage in USA territory
by a UK based corporate giant. The government of USA & Supreme Court of USA extracted huge cost & compensation from UK based British
Petroleum , for American citizens suffering due to the oil spillage. The arrogant Government of USA & Supreme Court of USA shamelessly
perceives lives of Americans precious and others as cheap. Our spineless Indian government , supreme court of india bows , kow tows before
them.
M . The government of India & Government of Madhya Pradesh who are themselves culprits alongwith UCIL to cover up their own crimes , to
favor US multinational enacted a new law curtailing the legal rights of Bhopal gas victims , Indian citizens.
N . Shamelessly Supreme Court of India , went a step further Then Chief Justice of India Justice Ahmadi & his bench colleagues diluted the
penal charges of prosecution.

O . Till date neither Union Carbide nor DOW who took over the management of Union Carbide has paid right cost & compensation nor they
have cared about the clean up of Bhopal gas disaster site till date even after decades.
P . When Government of USA & Supreme Court of USA does not respect Indian Laws , Indian citizens why should American Citizens ,
American Corporations , American Interests in Indian territory should be protected ?

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are Multi national Corporations & it’s top executives above law ? Is the acts of our ministers , judges in aiding a criminal , fugitive to run away
from law just , legal ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , legal prosecution of guilty under ARTICLE 21 , ARTICLE 14 – 16 , ARTICLE 21 , seeking Justice ,
compensation and for issuance of WRIT of MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

4. Averment:
Give what action has been taken against culprits involved in Bhopal gas leak case till date.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to legally prosecute Madhya Pradesh state government industry department ,
factories safety & Inspectorate department and MP Pollution Control Board officials for criminal negligence of duties.
(iii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to legally prosecute the MP state government & Indian government ministers
and officials who helped fugitive Mr. Warren Anderson to run away from Indian law.
(iv) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to legally prosecute the MP state government & Indian government ministers
and officials who failed to seek extradition of Mr. Anderson and other UC top executives from USA.
(v) ) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to legally prosecute the MP state government & Indian government ministers
and officials who failed to extract appropriate compensation , costs from Union Carbide or from DOW or from counter guarantor Government
of USA till date.
(vi) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to declare void , annul the Bhopal Gas Victims Act and related enactments ,
government orders passed by both Government of India and Government of Madhya Pradesh which curtails the constitutional rights of
Bhopal gas leak victims.
(vii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to legally prosecute former chief justice of india Mr. Ahmadi & his bench
colleagues who diluted the prosecution charges against union carbide and it’s top executives.
(viii) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to order DOW Chemicals to pay the appropriate cost & compensation
towards Bhopal gas leak disaster.
(ix) Hereby , I do request the honourable supreme court of india to order Government of USA , Supreme Court of USA to respect Indian Law if
they want reciprocal respect. To order government of USA & Supreme Court of USA to extradite former top executives of Union Carbide to
India , to ensure appropriate payment of cost , compensation in the said case as government of USA happens to be a counter guarantor.
(x) To declare President of USA & Chief Justice of USA as criminals for their double standards , for aiding perpetrators of man slaughter at
Bhopal .
(xI) To order for CBI investigation into assets of Mr.Ahmadi , ministers , government officials who helped union carbide & it’s executives.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Date : 07th November 2015………………………………Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.

Place : Mysuru India…………………………………………..Petitioner in person

10. PIL – Land Mafia and Judges
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
2. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed to government of karnataka authorities , MUDA , BDA , KIADB , MCC , BBMNP , etc seeking
information regarding illegal buildings , land encroachments specifically in mysore & bangalore , they didn’t provide me information. Now one
land scam after another are tumbling out.
3. I have given certain details to authorities including judiciary , SCI regarding land , lake encroachments in mysore when encroachment was
at preliminary stage. The authories cold have stopped it , but they didn,t. Now , the hinkal lake , hebbal lake , hootagalli lake & BEML Quarters
lake have been encroached to maximum extent and criminals have made crores of rupees profit.
4. Government authorities has not given title deeds to tribals living in forest since centuries , government authorities has not given title deeds
to landless people , dalits who are cultivating on government land since decades.
5. Government authorities , police immediately evict , take suo motto action when a poor family , nomadic family just erects a hutment on
government land. The same public servants , police don’t take action when a rich crook palatial bungalow , business complex on government
land , lake bed. Cann’t they see it. , they can but are hands in glove with looters.
6. even some of the judges don’t take action when appeal for justice is made to them , to evict encroachers , to stop encroachment. It may be
quid pro quo arrangement with crooks. See how many judges have benefitted from government discretionery quota allotment of sites , illegal
judicial layout , etc.

7. The land encroachers are not poor people below poverty line , they don’t even have ability to build a pucca house. Encroachers are rich
crooks , greedy individuals with political connection. So they don’t deserve compassion.
8. Now , government of karnataka is trying to legalise illegalities in buildings , land encroachments , which gives a booster dose to criminals to
commit more crimes.
9. As per equitable law if present land encroachments are legalized , in future too government must legalize future land encroachments when
ever it takes place.
10. Prior to enactment of AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME of government of karnataka legalizing illegal constructions , land encroachments,
MUDA , BDA , MCC , KIADB officials evicted , demolished buildings of encroachers who didn’t cough up bribes. The one who paid bribes ,
their encroachments , illegal buildings survived and now getting legalized by government.
11. Now , as per equity who ever have been evicted from encroachments , who’s illegal buildings demolished must get compensation from
government. If not all encroachers must be evicted & illegal buildings must be demolished.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Is robbing another’s property right , legal ? is robbing land , lake – a public property for private , individual use right ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of land grabbing ,frauds.

4. Averment:
Covering up Land Frauds & Land Mafia . Please read details at :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-first-appeal---muda-bda-kiadb ,

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see howcareless
our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which
are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants , Government of Karnataka authorities in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Kindly read full details at following web page :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-first-appeal---muda-bda-kiadb ,

Dated : 23rd July 2015 ………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India…………………….PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

11. PIL – Death Penalty

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
We have utmost heartfelt respects to honest few in judiciary , police & public service. We SALUTE them. Our effort here is to bring errant
judges , police & public servants to book.
Democracy is relatively best form of governance, compared to monarchy , communism , dictatorship. The founding pillar of democracy is
honesty & integrity of public servants. When criminals become public servants , indulges in corrupt , criminal practices democracy fails. Such
corrupt public servants , corrupt judges , corrupt police are inside enemies , traitors and cause more damage to national security than
terrorists , naxalites or enemy armies. Which court dares to hang such corrupt judges , corrupt police ?
A. Terrorism is an inhuman act ,terrorists are inhumans , beasts , don’t deserve humane treatment. Those causing terror , aiding , abetting
terror don’t deserve humane treatment. One among those terrorists yakub memmon responsible for Bombay bomb blast rightly deserved
death sentence.
B. Dhananjay chatterjee killed an innocent little girl. He too rightly deserved death sentence.
Law Regarding death sentence is right , problem lies in it’s interpretation & enforcement . some of our corrupt judges , corrupt police , public
servants have biased view. In india , legal system can be manipulated , evidences concocted , witnesses coerced , false confessions taken
under third degree torture methods , judgement / match fixing is done. Read full details with actual cases …… A – Z of Manipulation of Indian
Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

There is every possibility of innocent persons belonging to weaker , vulnerable sections of society , who cann’t defend themselves getting
irreversible death sentence. Even if a death sentence is proved to be wrong afterwards , judges cann’t bring them back to life. Judges are
NOT Gods. That is why , Judges please don’t play GOD. Please go through following actual cases fit for death sentences , but with biased
view & under the patronage of powers that be escaped gallows.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Why death sentence to few , while not for others even though they deserve it ? Why there is a bias in awarding death sentence ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for right , unbiased prosecution , equitable justice for all.

4. Averment:
A. What action against dawood Ibrahim & tiger memmon ? what action against ministers , police , film personalities who have ties with
dawood & attended parties hosted by dawood @ gulf ? why no action against them ? why no action against persons storing arms ,
ammunition for Bombay blasts ? why tada charges were diluted for some influential criminals ? biased law enforcement.
B. Why not death sentence to those responsible for burning Sabarmati express train passengers ? biased law enforcement.
C. Why not death sentence for those master minds & tools responsible for godhra riots ? why not gujarath state government appealed to
higher court seeking death sentence to perpetrators of godhra riots ? biased law enforcement.
D. Why not death sentence to those responsible for murdering RTI activists , whistle blowers ? biased law enforcement.
E. Why not death sentence to those responsible for murdering whistle blowers satyendra dubey & IOCL Manjunath ? biased law enforcement.
F. Why not death sentence to those responsible for Bombay riots prior to Bombay bomb blasts ? in some cases state government ,
prosecution even withdrew cases against rioters , filed “B” reports closing the cases, in some cases prosecution failed to properly present
witnesses , evidences before court and in some cases failed to appeal to higher courts. biased law enforcement.
G. Why not death sentence to those responsible for sikh massacre in delhi after assassination of PM Indira Gandhi ? in some cases state
government , prosecution even withdrew cases against rioters , filed “B” reports closing the cases , in some cases prosecution failed to
properly present witnesses , evidences before court and in some cases failed to appeal to higher courts.. biased law enforcement.
H. Why not death sentence to both master minds & tools of late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case ? biased law enforcement.
I. Why not death sentence to STF police personnel who ran a place called “workshop” in MM Hills , Karnataka. STF Police personnel during
operation to nab forest brigand veerappan applied very cruel, inhuman 3rd degree torture methods on tribals , innocents to extract false
confessions at this place called workshop. Some innocents died unable to bear the torture by police. This cruel act was proved before
statutorily constituted human rights commission judge , still no death sentence to STF Police personnel , why ? biased law enforcement.
J. Why not death sentence to police officials responsible for cold blooded murders , fake encounters , lock up deaths , third degree torture of
innocents ? biased law enforcement. Refer TORTURE CHAMBERS OF INDA……https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/thirddegree-torture-of-chief-justice-of-india-karnataka-dgp-union-home-secretary , https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/torture-chambers-ofindia
K. Why not government pay compensation to civilian victims of terrorist acts , riots ? why don’t government pay appropriate respect ,
recognition , compensation to police , security , military personnel who lay down their lives in the line of duty guarding our motherland & our
brethren ?
L. Why lenient punishment to approvers in some cases , but not to yakub memmon ? Yakub memmon helped prosecution in gathering
evidences regarding Bombay bomb blast case , still no leniency by court , why ? biased law enforcement.
M. Why no action against corrupt , criminal judges & police who doesn’t do their duties , who doesn’t give information under RTI , who doesn’t
admit , hear PIL appeals thereby protecting the crimianls ? biased law enforcement. Read NOTICE TO CJI
http://www.scribd.com/doc/273722960/Wake-up-Chief-Justice-of-India , https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/pil---notice-to-cji
N. Universal Law , Indian law proclaims terrorism , aiding & abetting terrorism a crime. Why does the Indian government agencies aids &
abets counter terrorist groups in jammu Kashmir , north east states of india ? why state government & Indian government supports , aids
SALWA JUDUM a counter terrorist , anti naxalite outfit which is jointly responsible for terrorism in chattisgarh state ? why tamilnadu state
government & Indian government aided tamil terrorists in srilanka ? why Indian government is aiding terror outfits in afghanistan & Pakistan ?
why indian government supported terrorists in east Pakistan , ultimately creating Pakistan ? all these dastardly , cruel acts of indian
government has resulted in bloodshed , still resulting in loss of numerous innocent lives. Why don’t Indian government mind it’s own
business ? india has enough domestic problems to solve , why don’t the government use tax payer’s money to solve domestic problems

instead of interfering in other’s affairs resulting in bloodshed ? why NOT Death Sentence to prime minister of india & president of india at
those times responsible for authorizing aid to terrorists ? biased law enforcement.
O. Late Mr.Warren Anderson was in control of Bhopal United Carbide plant , through internal safety checks & 3rd party audits he was privy to
glaring safety lapses on part of union carbide management. Still he chose to keep mum , which resulted in Bhopal gas tragedy killing
thousands of innocents , maiming lakhs of human beings & still even new born babies in the locality are contracting ailments. Courtesy
Mr.Anderson. Such a butcher Anderson was arrested by local police under man slaughter charges , produced before court. However ministers
, government officials of both state & central governments without orders , permission from the court illegally got him out of jail arranged a
special car , special aeroplane for the culprit to escape from law. Years afterwards , a CJI of supreme court of india diluted the man slaughter
charges against Mr.Anderson. Why no death sentence to Anderson responsible for death & sufferings of lakhs of people ? why no deth
sentence to chief minister , minister , police , officials who helped Anderson escape from Indian law ? why no death sentence to CJI who
diluted charges against Anderson ? biased law enforcement.

In the backdrop of above cases , the fact is our legal system is imperfect , error prone. Therefore , it must become professional , perfect in it’s
duty first , to punish all the wrong doers. Till , such a time death penalty must be kept on hold or abolished. If it cann’t , at the least it can give
choice of death to convicts like death by sleeping pill or injection or gun shot , etc instead of medieval hanging.
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , common men & see how
careless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other
petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c . to abolish death penalty or to give choice of death to convicts.
d . To legally prosecute authorities of supreme court of india for not answering show cause notice issued to them and order them to answer
the show cause notice as well as RTI questions given to them by the petitioner.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 8th August 2015 ………………..FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India…………………….PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

12. PIL – Stop Robberies @ RBI by bank staff
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Governor , Reserve Bank of India (RBI) & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
2. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed to RBI authorities since years seeking justice regarding illegalities , irregularities in recruitment ,
currency handling , currency theft , etc @ RBI , they didn’t provide justice at all.
3. For a common man it is a herculean task to get Rs.5000 loan from a bank , but rich & connected get lakhs , crores of rupees loan quite
easily from banks , how ?
4. When a common man , farmer defaults to pay loan of few thousands of rupees bank immediately dispatches loan recovery agents /
Rowdies , seizes his property & auctions and recover their dues to last penny. Farmers are committing suicide unable to pay loans to escape
from ignominy .
5. Huge companies get crores of rupees loan from banks eventhough basically the project report itself is at fault , not viable. Siphons off
company resources by insider trading to their sister concerns although bank representatives are very much their on the board of companies.
6 . Such companies default on loan dues to bank , but no recovery agents / rowdies are sent by banks. Finally the company becomes bust.
7. Bank looses money , the company is declared as NON PERFORMING ASSET and government + bank waives off interest or else loan
itself.
8. End looser the public whose money went down the drain , profiteers – company promoters , executives and bank manager. No recovery
from their personal , family properties why ?

2. Question(s) of Law:
Is it right for banks , government to let out fraudsters without criminal prosecution ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of financial frauds.

4. Averment:
Covering up Financial Frauds. Please read details at :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rbi---robberer-s-bureau-of-india ,
https://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/2015/07/19/rbi-robberers-bureau-of-india/ ,

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see howcareless
our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which
are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants , RBI authorities in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s RBI & M/s BRBNMPL , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of criminals responsible
for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.
Kindly read full details at following web page :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rbi---robberer-s-bureau-of-india ,
https://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/2015/07/19/rbi-robberers-bureau-of-india/ ,

Dated : 23rd July 2015 ………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India…………………….PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

13. PIL – Late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
2. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed years ago to union home ministry & supreme court of india , to permit me to appear before
Honourable Jain commission of Enquiry probing late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case as well as before honourable Supreme Court of
India as an amicus curie to shed light on case , parallel investigation needed , I was not permitted.
3. Now , the Investigating Officer ( IO ) who probed the case himself is crying foul.
4. This amounts to cover-up of crimes & shielding of master minds of Rajiv assassination case by supreme court of india.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Who master minded the assassination of Late Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi assassination. When there is no justice to the family of former
prime minister , what is the fate of commoners ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of assassination.

4. Averment:
Covering up Late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination conspiracy & BOFORS SCAM
The CBI & GOI is more interested in favoring accused persons , Quattrochi & closing BOFORS Case than punishing the guilty.
The GOI & investigating authorities have failed to punish the real master minds behind the Late Prime minister Shri . Rajiv Gandhi
assassination case .
When a responsible Indian citizen volunteered to appear before the supreme court of india as an amicus curie , to give certain information
before the court relating to this assassination , he was not at all permitted. Instead he was threatened , attempts made to murder him , his
news paper was closed , his jobs were illegally snatched away , police & investigating agencies repeatedly grilled him , THE PURPOSE IS TO
SILENCE THAT PERSON . The Police failed to act upon his complaints. The Supreme Court of India Failed to admit his PIL Petitions. ALL TO
COVER UP THE POWERS THAT BE .
who are covering-up late p.m. rajiv gandhi assassination case? who are those conspirators? who are trying to silence me?
My sufferings began hand in hand with my crusade. I have raised various issues of social concern from time to time at the appropriate levels,
one of those is LATE P.M. RAJIV GANDHI ASASSINATION CASE. where-in only the tools of the conspirator’s were punished where as the
conspirators are roaming free. i have raised this topic of inequity , travesty of justice and sought a fair, proper enquiry& trial , at various
forums. but to no avail.
the conspirators were disturbed by this and tried to silence me by threatening me, physically assaulting me and even made attempts to
murder me. they prevented me from appearing before the JAIN COMMISSION OF ENQUIRY. they even manipulated the recruitment systems
to deny me the appointments in R.B.I.CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE, P.E.S. COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING MANDYA, N.I.E
MYSORE , District Court Mysore & Illegally snatched away my job in RPG Cables Ltd , Mysore . they even tried to silence me by forcibly
closing down my newspaper publications THE TESTUDO & VOICE OF CRUSADER.
my appeals for justice resulted only in police enquiries. the central intelligence bureau(I.B.) state intelligence & state police personnel
enquired me exhaustively number of times, but they never did enquire the powers that be. any way these people don’t have practical powers
to enquire such people. the highest constitutional functionaries who can order a proper enquiry, trial are keeping mum inspite of repeated
appeals. probably they are acting under the directions of conspirators. thereby they are not only covering up the crime, they are actively

sponsoring terrorism , but are also violating my fundamental/human rights & obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a
citizen of india.
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see howcareless
our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which
are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. To legally prosecute the public servants who are responsible for not giving press accreditation to my web news papers , myself as a
journalist and responsible for closure of my news papers.
d. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s RPG Cables Ltd , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of criminals responsible for
late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
e. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s PES College of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of criminals
responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
f. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s National Institute of Engineering , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of criminals
responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
g. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s Reserve Bank Note Nudran Pvt Ltd , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of
criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
h. To legally prosecute authorities of Mysore District Courts & Bangalore District Courts , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest
of criminals responsible for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
i. To legally prosecute persons responsible for attempts on my life.
j. to legally prosecute judges , police & CBI officials responsible for cover-up of late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
K . To provide protection to life , liberty , livelihood , jobs of me , my family members & dependants.
l. To reopen , reinvestigate assassination case of Late PM Rajiv Gandhi.
m. To legally prosecute authorities of supreme court of india for not answering show cause notice issued to them and order them to answer
the show cause notice as well as RTI questions given to them by the petitioner.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Kindly read full details at following web page :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/who-rae-covering---up ,
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/judges-cover-up-rajiv-assassination ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---pm-rajiv-assassination-cover-up

Dated : 20TH June 2015 ………………..FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India…………………….PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

14. PIL - Telecables Scam

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Cabinet Secretary ( Telecommunications) Government of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
2. Eventhough , certain PIJF companies were previously found to be involved in illegal practices , CPIO of DOT / BSNL is hiding information .
Thereby , he is trying to shield criminals.
3. By this action CPIO of DOT / BSNL is aiding criminals.

2. Question(s) of Law:
DOT / BSNL has paid crores of rupees to PIJF Telecable manufacturers towards purchase of cables. The money is from public exchequer ,
people’s money . That public money is swindled by cable manufacturers with tacit support of DOT / BSNL officials. Why no prosecution of
DOT / BSNL officials & cable manufacturers ? are they above law ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Accountability for public money worth crores of rupees.

4. Averment:
Private companies in their greed for money are violating norms in league with public officials. They have caused loss to the public exchequer.

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see howcareless
our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which
are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Kindly read full details at following web page :
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218 ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---telecable-scam

Dated : 13th June 2015……………………………………….. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India………………………….. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

15. PIL - Killer Noodles , Medicines of India
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Chief Secretary Government of Karnataka & Principal Secretaries , Food & Health , Government of India
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
2. Eventhough certain food products are banned & certain medicines are banned in developed nations , still they are permitted to be
manufactured & sold in india.
3. Eventhough certain food products & medicines are manufactured within stipulated limits of ingredients in developed nations , the
multinational companies cross those limits in india.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are the lives of millions of Indians cheaper , dispensable ? Are the lives of Indians cheaper than the lives of white skinned people in
developed nations.

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , protection of indian’s lives & prosecution of guilty public servants who permitted manufacturers / sellers of
killer noodles , killer colas & killer medicines.

4. Averment:
Multinational companies , private companies in their greed for money are violating norms by established international bodies and making
money by slowly killing people , by their fake food products & fake medicines. Our own corrupt central government & state government public
servants are giving licenses , clearances to those companies to carry on their illegal businesses. Who will bear the cost of loss of lives ,
damages to health of gullible public , hapless Indians ?
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none of them were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not
given. See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see how
careless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other
petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Kindly read full details at following web page :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/pil---threat-to-judge ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---killer-noodles-colas-medicines ,

Dated : 11th June 2015…………………………. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India…………………………… PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

16. PIL - Ye Judges You , everyone of us inferior subservient to CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
Accountability of Judges a MUST

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R ,
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice ,
# LIG 2 , No 761 , HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
.....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF
MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
Our whole hearted respects to honest few in judiciary , parliament & public service. Our salutes to them , due to honest efforts of those few
noble persons only at least democracy is surviving in India.
A . "Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police ,
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.

B . As per the preamble of the constitution of India all the people , all Indian citizens are equal in every respect , equally entitled to justice ,
equally responsible to uphold constitution . Only People , Citizens of India are supreme No Judges , No Ministers , etc are supreme. Judges ,
ministers , president etc are all public servants constitutionally mandated to SERVE the public , NOT to master over them. Even after 69
years of independence these judges , ministers have not come out of colonial hangover instead become worse treating general public as their
servants.
C . Every institution in india is directly or indirectly accountable to people , however judiciary alone is not transparent not giving accounts of it’s
actions to people.
D . Judges enjoy 5 star pay & perks , making merry at the cost of people’s money , public exchequer , but are not giving accounts of their
actions to people , not transparent to the public eye. They are not even honouring RTI applications seeking information about actions of
judges , because corrupt judges will be caught red handed.
E . Judges are not super humans nor super brains nor from moon or mars , they are ordinary mortals from the society around us and just like
us capable of doing good work as well falling prey to human lures like bribe , corruption , favoritism , etc.
F. Judges think they are sole custodians of constitution of india , in fact every citizen of india is a custodian of constitution of india.
G . Collegium of judges is nothing but a coterie , a MAFIA proof - unfit corrupt persons like dinakaran , another judge involved in mysore roost
resort sex scandal being selected by SCI collegium promoted to the apex court. It is just the tip of iceberg , behind the judicial veil of secrecy
many corrupt judges are hiding. Hereby , I challenge Honourable supreme court of india that subject to conditions I will bring to book corrupt
judges who are hiding behind the veil. Are you ready ?
H . When compared to some corrupt judges who are nothing but criminals , a drain , parasites on our public exchequer , society , the child
workers who are hard working earning less than rupees 32 a day are far better , great human beings.
I . Ofcourse when the court identifies that intentions of an act of parliament as unconstitutional , it has the right to strike it down to uphold the
supremacy of constitution. NJAC Act passed by parliament was in fact filling a legal vaccum about accountability & selection of judges and in
turn strengthening the constitution of india. But by striking down NJAC Act of government of india , supreme court of india is weakening
constitution of india , making contempt of parliament , constitution & all Indian citizens. If at all supreme court was really sincere it could have
suggested more alternatives for transparent , accountable judiciary with appropriate transparent provisions for guarding judicial
independence.
J . When government of india passed unconstitutional acts like land acquisition bill , special status to Kashmir , against uniform civil code
promoted unequal differing civil laws for various religion people and Bhopal gas victims act , nuclear energy act , etc , did it not dawn on
supreme court of india that it is the sole custodian of constitution ? then why not SCI strike down those unconstitutional parliamentary acts ?
K . It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard the constitutional rights of every Indian citizens . Since 25 years I am appealing
to SCI about issues concerning public welfare , national security , etc and as a result suffering injustices , my constitutional rights , human
rights are repeatedly violated but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made to it. Paradoxically , after these appeals for justice , I
have suffered more injustices , attempts on my life were made , physically assaulted , livelihood / jobs were denied , news publication closed ,
press accreditation denied , received threatening calls , blank calls, even to date rough elements follow us , rough elements scout near home
at mid night. Does not these indicate some ties between rough elements & SCI Judges ?
L . Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing unavailability. If at all information is not truly
available , why didn’t the CPIO TRANSFER rti application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective High
Courts , etc.
M . Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each employee including judges. If not on what basis they give
promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR can give infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking
that person to share infor mation ?
N . If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for
investigation to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into tens of pages
sometimes even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to
national security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only cover-up , WHY ? Are Judges & Police above Law ? Is Judge’s MAFIA at
play ?
O . The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to previous
RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by covering up judges & their crimes. Billions of
indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower middle class people toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but
still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame to JUDGEs that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money , from
taxes paid by us still not do their constitutional duties properly.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are Judges above Law & can go scot free ? Can judges cheat , rape , swindle others and go scot free without legal prosecution ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , free expression & protection to life & liberty. Transparency , accountability in selection & functioning of Judges.

4. Averment:
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES &
FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects to them.
HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS –
WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT
SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT
OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS
FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND
CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN
DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN
JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :

https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A – Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,
RTI & Land Golmaal
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
Why NOT 3rd degree Torture of Corrupt Doctors , Police & Judges
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.in/2015/10/why-not-3rd-degree-torture-of-doctors.html#links ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/3rd-degree-torture-by-doctors-police ,

Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi to answer the following questions
in public interest , for safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the
judiciary & police. Judges are not superior human beings , some of them have even became judges through devious means other than merit ,
integrity. Judges are public servants drawing salary & perks from public exchequer and accountable to public as any other common man is.

We salute our freedom fighters , military personnel & martyrs for all the sacrifices made by them. Let us build a strong , Secular , Democratic
India by getting rid off few corrupt elements , anti nationals , traitors among public servants , among judiciary & among police who are greater
threat to India’s unity & integrity than Pakistani terrorists or chinese military.
Information input forms part of process of one’s expression. One’s expression in any forms – written , oral , etc becomes information input to
the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information & Expression are inseparable parts & form lifeline of a democracy. That is the
reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a person’s right to expression
is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.
In a democracy , people have a right to know how the public servants are functioning. However till date public servants are hiding behind the
veil of Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created by british to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public servants are
hiding their own corruption , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI Act is not being followed intoto by public servants. However
the recent delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under RTI purview & bound to answer RTI request , is noteworthy.
Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President of India , DG & IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The
information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past ,
present continuing injustices meted out to millions of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal work practices of Indian judges , police & public
servants . The information we sought would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals in public service. The information we are seeking
are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service & strengthens
our national security , national unity & integrity.
Hereby , i do request the honourable supreme court of india , for a Supreme Court monitored CBI Enquiry into this whole issue as karnataka
police are helpless , they don't have legal powers to prosecute high & mighty , constitutional functionaries. They have not even enquired the
guilty VVIPs even once however Under pressure from higher-ups they repeatedly called me the complainant to police station took statements
from me all for closing the files.
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none of them were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see how
careless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
(ii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to make public all the proceedings of supreme court collegiums and
correspondence between SCI , President’s office & government of india regarding selection of judges. To make public all the eligibility criteria
followed for selection of judges and who filled what criteria , who didn’t fill which criteria and the final ranking.
(iii) Hereby , I do request the honourble supreme court of india to uphold the constitution of india and to protect the constitutional rights of all
Indian citizens including mine.
(iv) to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

Read : https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/pil---writ-of-mandamus-1 ,

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Date : 23rd October 2015………………………………Filed By : Nagaraja.M.R.
Place : Mysuru India……………………………………Petitioner in person

17. PIL - Atrocities against Dalits by Government of Karnataka & Others

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Cabinet Secretary , Government of India , Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
In Karnataka dalits are oppressed in various ways by the influential people ,
1. In the recruitment process at Karnataka State Open University , vice chancellor / vested interests recruited unfit candidates belonging to
their own community sidelining the deserving dalit candidates .
2. In the recruitment process at Mysore University , vice chancellor / vested interests recruited unfit candidates belonging to their own
community sidelining the deserving dalit candidates .
3. In the recruitment process at Hassan , Mandya , Mysore & Shimoga Medical Colleges , vested interests recruited unfit candidates
belonging to their own community sidelining the deserving dalit candidates .
4. In the recruitment process of KPSC for gazetted officers , vested interests recruited unfit candidates belonging to their own community
sidelining the deserving dalit candidates .
5. In Karnataka , many privately managed Industrial Training Institutes , Polytechnics have mushroomed and are getting state government
grant. The managements have recruited people belonging to their own communities completely disregarding the recruitment rules of the
government. Still they are enjoying government grant without any legal prosecution of those guilty.
6. The Karnataka government officials immediately evict temporary hutments built by tribals , dalits on government land and demolish those
hutments. Whereas they allow huge buildings , complexes to be built on government land by influential upper caste people. The government
has kept those illegal buildings intact for years , allowed the encroachers to earn lakhs of rupees and now in the process of regularizing those
illegal encroachments.

The honourable governor of Karnataka , instead of taking legal action and legally prosecuting the guilty has taken side with the guilty
themselves. He has approved AKRAMA SAKRAMA scheme of the government , no action was taken against vice chancellors of KSOU &
Mysore University, etc. This is nothing but indirect way of atrocities against dalits , by supporting perpetrators of atrocities.
As a result , Since years unfit people are working as KAS officers , unfit people are working in KSOU , Mysore University , Unfit people are
working in medical colleges of Madya / Hassan / Mysore / Shimoga and earning thousands of rupees monthly salary. Influential upper caste
people are earning lakhs of rupees as rent from land encroachments and are on the verge of becoming legal owners of encroached lands.
Even in other states also Dalits are oppressed. See the recent suicide of doctoral student in University of Hyderabad , few moths back we
saw dalit atrocity in IIT Chennai.
The poor dalits although talented & deserving are without seats , facilities in educational institutions , jobs , without livelihood & shelter.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are NOT Dalits , citizens of India ? Don’t Dalit’s have constitutional rights & human rights to be treated equally ? Why not criminal prosecution
of high & mighty practicing dalit atrocities ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Protection of Fundamental & Human Rights of all DALITs.

4. Averment:
Corrupt people within Government of Karnataka are violating government norms during recruitment various educational institutions and while
demolishing illegal structures. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus”
and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
(i) Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties.
(ii) To criminally prosecute government of Karnataka chief secretary & governor of Karnataka , for all the above mentioned recruitment
scandals , for their failure of duties.
(iii) To immediately evict land encroachers & prosecute them irrespective of the caste they belong to. Only eviction of dalits , tribals ,
downtrodden people & demolition of hutments belonging to them while sparing big buildings belonging to rich , influential forward caste
people should not be done.
(iv) To annul the moves by Government of Karnataka to regularize big illegal structures built by rich , influential forward caste people without
rehabilitating the evicted dalits , tribals , downtrodden. To declare it as illegal.
(v) To recover monetary gains made by the encroachers.
(vi) To terminate the services of unfit candidates selected in the above mentioned recruitment processes.
(vii) To legally prosecute the recruiting authority officials in all the above recruitments.
(viii) To make proper appointments with due consideration to dalits , backward class people in all the above institutions , as per law.
(ix) To pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
(x) To take action against those responsible for atrocities against Dalits in University of Hyderabad & IIT Chennai.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.
Kindly read full details at following web page :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/pil---dalit-atrocities-by-government-of-karnataka

Dated : 19TH January 2015……………………………………….. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India………………………….. …………………..PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

18. PIL – BANK ROBBERIES by bank executives
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Governor , Reserve Bank of India (RBI) & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
2. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed to RBI authorities since years seeking justice regarding illegalities , irregularities in recruitment ,
currency handling , currency theft , etc @ RBI , they didn’t provide justice at all.
3. For a common man it is a herculean task to get Rs.5000 loan from a bank , but rich & connected get lakhs , crores of rupees loan quite
easily from banks , how ?
4. When a common man , farmer defaults to pay loan of few thousands of rupees bank immediately dispatches loan recovery agents /
Rowdies , seizes his property & auctions and recover their dues to last penny. Farmers are committing suicide unable to pay loans to escape
from ignominy .
5. Huge companies get crores of rupees loan from banks eventhough basically the project report itself is at fault , not viable. Siphons off
company resources by insider trading to their sister concerns although bank representatives are very much their on the board of companies.
6 . Such companies default on loan dues to bank , but no recovery agents / rowdies are sent by banks. Finally the company becomes bust.
7. Bank looses money , the company is declared as NON PERFORMING ASSET and government + bank waives off interest or else loan
itself.

8. End looser the public whose money went down the drain , profiteers – company promoters , executives and bank manager. No recovery
from their personal , family properties why ?
9. Eventhough , I have repeatedly appealed to RBI authorities , Union Finance Ministry since years seeking information under RTI Act
regarding illegalities , irregularities in RBI , Various banks , RBI Note Press ( BRBNMPL ) , etc , the RBI authorities have evaded answering
our questions lest the TRUTH come out. Supreme court of India specifically Chief Justice of India were also approached to order RBI , Union
Finance Ministry to disclose information to us in public interest. But SCI , CJI also failed to do their duties.
10. The money involved here is public money , it is nobody’s papa’s money.
11. These swindled monies are finding it’s way to under world , Mafia & Terror outfits. This proves RBI Governor , Union Finance Minister and
Chief Justice of India are least bothered to safe guard PUBLIC MONEY. They are least bothered about our national security.
12. We have offered our conditional services to RBI , Union Finance Ministry & SCI to apprehend corporate criminals , to recover money while
the concerned officials have failed to do their duties. Till date RBI , SCI , Government have failed to respond to our offer.
13. We SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice once again offer our conditional services to authorities , RBI , SCI to legally
apprehend corporate criminals , tax evaders & corrupt bank executives and to recover monies from them. Are RBI , SCI & Union Finance
Ministry Ready to catch tax thieves , corporate criminals , corporate terrorists ? Are they ready to utilize our services ?
14. By , shielding corporate criminals RBI , SCI , Union finance ministry are shielding corporate criminals to continue financial aid to terrorist
outfits , underworld & mafia. Thereby , RBI Governor , Union Finance Minister & CJI , Supreme Court of India have also become parties to
those crimes , they themselves have become criminals.
15. These Huge financial frauds , swindling for years cann’t happen repeatedly for years without tacit understanding , cooperation , collusion ,
connivance of RBI GOVERNOR and UNION FINANCE MINISTER. These crimes are spared from fair , timely legal trials with tacit support of
Chief Justice of India.
16. These swindled money is destabilizing our economy , funding terrorist outfits , mafia & underworld. These are posing constant threat to
our national security , integrity.
17. By financially supporting funding of criminals , terrorists RBI GOVERNOR , UNION FINANCE MINSTER & CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA
themselves have become anti nationals , criminals , terrorists.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Is it right for banks , government to let out fraudsters , bank executives without criminal prosecution & recovery ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of financial frauds.

4. Averment:
Covering up Financial Frauds. Please read details at :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rbi---robberer-s-bureau-of-india ,
https://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/2015/07/19/rbi-robberers-bureau-of-india/ ,

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see howcareless
our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which
are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants , RBI authorities in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the below RTI questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. To legally prosecute authorities of M/s RBI & M/s BRBNMPL , who denied job opportunities to me under the behest of criminals responsible
for late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case.
d. To legally prosecute responsible bank executives & fraudsters.
e. To make it mandatory for all bank executives including board members to make their income , wealth details public every year. This must
be disclosed under RTI A ct.
f. To form a statutory mechanism to share information about creditors , debtors , borrowers , policy holders , insurers , wealth managers , etc
between all financial institutions like SEBI , RBI , IRDA , Banks , etc. Creditor , debtor information must be disclosed under RTI Act.
g. To book criminal cases of Rowdyism , goondaism against rowdy loan recovery agents & respective bank managers.
h. To reopen cases of Currency exchange scandal @ RBI Bangalore incinerator and currency theft cases @ RBI currency note press ,
Mysuru. To also legally prosecute bank executives & CBI investigating officials who shielded original criminals in these cases.
i. To order full payment of unjustly withheld salary , gratuity , pension dues , etc to victimized RBI staff Mr. Ganapathi Hariram immediately.
j. To appoint a person from lending bank to loan availing companies to monitor it’s daily financial affairs.
k. To legally prosecute RBI Governor , Chief Justice of India & Union Finance Minister for aiding fund raisers of terrorists , underworld.
l. To order Government of India to accept our conditional offer of apprehending corporate terrorists.
m. To criminal legal prosecution against promoters of fraud companies , partners in their crimes supporting company executives and bank
executives.
n. To order for recovery of money with interest & penalty , by confiscation of properties of such company promoters , their family properties ,
property of concerned bank executives and most importantly PROPERTIES OF RBI GOVERNOR , UNION FINANCE MINISTER & CJI must
be attached.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Kindly read full details at following web page :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rbi---robberer-s-bureau-of-india ,
https://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/2015/07/19/rbi-robberers-bureau-of-india/ ,

Dated : 12th March 2016 ………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

19.PIL – Denial of Super Speciality Treatment by ESIC Hospital
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Director General , Employees State Insurance Corporation , New Delhi & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:
ESIC is a statutory organization with statutory duties.
ESIC organization , it’s staff are surviving , thriving on contributions made by we the factory employees and our company managements.
ESIC officers , doctors are getting tens of thousands of rupees monthly salaries , perks , all by our contributions. We are toiling hard in
factories day & night through out the year and feeding these arrogant ESIC officials , doctors.
ESIC as per law promised certain medical services , medical facilities ( including super speciality medical treatment facilities either at esi
hospitals or in private referral hospitals ) to the factory workers in lieu of monthly insurance contribution , premium payment by factory
employees. It is a business deal or a business contract.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Is it right for ESIC officials , Doctors to deny super speciality hospital facilities to the insured persons ?
Are not ESIC officials , doctors directly responsible for premature death of insured persons , aggravation of diseases , health problems of
insured persons due to denial of super speciality health care eventhough they are entitled to it as per contract , law ?
Are not ESIC officials , Doctors violating law , business contract & rights of factory workers / insured persons ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , protection of constitutional rights , human rights , labour rights , consumer rights of factory workers , insured
persons.

4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants , ESIC officials , doctors in the present cases to perform their duties , to respect the rights of insured persons ,
factory employees.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants in the present case , to perform their duties.

b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. To legally prosecute guilty ESIC officials , Doctors who have violated rights of factory employees , insured persons.
d. To order ESIC to bear the full cost including loss of insured lives due to denial of super speciality treatment.
e. To recover such amount from salaries , pension , properties of guilty ESIC officials , doctors as land arrears , land dues to government.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 20th April 2016 …………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

20. PIL – NO AMNESTY to Black Money Launderers
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Cabinet Secretary , Government of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
2. Corruption is rampant in tax enforcement , law enforcement agencies of the government.
3. In India , a small shop owner to big industrialist have mastered the art of TAX EVASION . their teachers - some corrupt tax officials &
auditors. The black money thus created is causing inflation, feeding the mafia , underworld. Some industrialists lobby ( bribe ) with the

government & gets favourable laws enacted. This black money is the main source of funds for political parties , religious bodies & terrorist
outfits.
The recent raids by C.B.I & KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA have proved how the tax officials have become multi-millionaires. The sad part is
that some of the police officials who are on deputation to C.B.I & LOKAYUKTHA themselves are utterly corrupt.
This scourge can only be cured by corporate accountability intoto. However , all the industrialists , traders who are demanding for more
flexible labour reforms , economic reforms , infrastructure , etc are not at all concerned about their own accountability with respect to tax ,
environment , other laws. The MNCs coming to India are not coming here for best Indian talents or infrastructure alone. In their own countries
they are feeling the heat of strict environment laws , consumer laws , share holder disclosures , corporate accountability. Some of these
MNCs are being kicked out of their countries , by it's own people .These MNCs are aware that in India , by greasing the palms environment
laws , labour laws , tax laws , etc everything can be flouted , cases in courts can be dragged on for years . share holder disclosures ,
corporate transparency is minimum.
4. However when a concerned citizen complains about the crimes of guilty corporates , organizations or corrupt public servants , immediate
action is not taken. The file is kept pending for months , years together , allowing the criminals to manipulate all the evidences , records ,
ground situations. Finally even if action is taken guilty will be let out due to favorable evidences , there are chances that the concerned citizen
himself is falsely implicated & put behind bars . in all such cases all the involved parties must be subjected to lie detector tests .

2. Question(s) of Law:
Is it right for banks , tax authorities , government to let out fraudsters , guilty bank executives , guilty tax officials without criminal prosecution
& recovery ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of master minds of financial frauds / tax evasions.

4. Averment:
Covering up Financial Frauds. Please read details at :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rbi---robberer-s-bureau-of-india ,
https://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/2015/07/19/rbi-robberers-bureau-of-india/ ,

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , commonmen & see howcareless
our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which
are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants , Tax Authorities , Law Enforcement Agencies , RBI authorities in the following cases to perform their duties &
to answer the below RTI questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. To legally prosecute responsible bank executives & fraudsters.
d. To make it mandatory for all bank executives , tax officials including board members to make their income , wealth details public every year.
This must be disclosed under RTI A ct.
e. To form a statutory mechanism to share information in real time ( through computer networking) about creditors , debtors , borrowers ,
policy holders , insurers , wealth managers , etc between all financial institutions like SEBI , RBI , IRDA , Banks , State and Central
Government Tax Authorities etc. Creditor , debtor information must be disclosed under RTI Act.

f. To appoint a person from lending bank to loan availing companies to monitor it’s daily financial affairs.
g. To legally prosecute RBI Governor , Chief Justice of India & Union Finance Minister for aiding fund raisers of terrorists , underworld.
h. To order Government of India to accept our conditional offer of apprehending corporate terrorists.
i. To criminal legal prosecution against promoters of fraud companies , partners in their crimes supporting company executives and bank
executives.
j. To order for recovery of money with interest & penalty , by confiscation of properties of such company promoters , their family properties ,
property of concerned bank executives , tax officials and most importantly PROPERTIES OF RBI GOVERNOR , UNION FINANCE MINISTER
& CJI must be attached.
k. Black Money & Crime are inter twined , two faces of the same coin . Amnesty must not be given to black money launderers , it is nothing
but legalizing the crimes of big criminals & crimes which are sources of black money. Thereby , government is giving legal sanction to those
criminals to commit more crimes to accumulate black money and government itself is waiving off it’s duty to legally prosecute those black
money launderers for the crimes which are the sources of those ill gotten money. As per the constitution , government must do it’s duty to
uphold law , it cann’t waive off it’s own duties. If a government cann’t do it’s duty , it must get out of the seat.
l. Police , Government , Judges spend thousands of rupees public money to legally prosecute a small thief caught for stealing hundred rupees
, where as now letting out big time looters who have stolen millions of rupees public money , who have earned money through swindling
banks , share holders , earned money by illegal money lending , rowdyism , drug trafficking , human trafficking , etc. It is against principle of
equitable justice , law. If the government is not able to catch , prosecute these black money launderers , it is unfit to be in the seat.
m. To immediately give a stay to the moves by government of india , giving amnesty to black money launderers from 01st June 2016. Also ,
annul such laws enacted by government of India.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Kindly read full details at following web page :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rbi---robberer-s-bureau-of-india ,
https://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/2015/07/19/rbi-robberers-bureau-of-india/ ,

Dated : 14th May 2016 ………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

21. PIL - Atrocities against Dalits by Government
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Cabinet Secretary , Government of India , Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt public servants.
In India dalits , tribals are oppressed in various ways by the influential people with the aid of authorities and by authorities , police themselves.
India is a democratic country with people’s self governance. Here laws must be framed as per the wishes of people. MPs , MLAs , MLCs are
just postmans of public passing on the message of people’s aspirations in the respective houses , parliament , legislative assembly.
MPs , MLAs , MLCs don’t have legal , moral , democratic right to impose any laws much against the wishes of their own people. It is illegal.
When people in a specified area doesn’t want a bauxite mining company in their area as it affects the local ecology , their livelihood , their
health , life how can MPs , MLAs give legal sanction to establishment of such companies ? How can MPs , MLAs impose such projects on
people much against their wishes ?
These type of functioning by ruling MPs , MLAs since decades favoring the rich , suppressing the poor has given rise to various people
movements including naxalism. Ofcourse , as the act of our MPs , MLAs are illegal , some acts of these movements are also illegal. Instead
the people associated with these movements must take up non violent path for expressing their disagreements with the government actions.
The government by misusing it’s powers , police machinery is illegally arresting , torturing innocents , murdering innocents to suppress the
voices seeking justice. The government is also illegally aiding various terrorist outfits like salwa judum , salwa judum-2 , Jharkhand jan mukti
parishad , etc all to silence voices seeking justice.
The government is targeting , illegally arresting , torturing journalists , lawyers who are legally supporting the voices seeking justice. The
government has gone to the extreme of SUMMARILY DISMISSING A SITTING JUDGE as he legally did his duty & upheld the rule of law.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are NOT Dalits , Tribals citizens of India ? Don’t Dalit’s , Tribals have constitutional rights & human rights to be treated equally ? Why not
criminal prosecution of high & mighty practicing dalit atrocities, atrocities against dalits , tribals ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Protection of Fundamental & Human Rights of all DALITs & TRIBALs.

4. Averment:
Corrupt people within Government in their greed for money are framing illegal , unjust laws much against the aspirations of people. Hereby , I
do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the Government
of india and all state governments to protect the constitutional rights , human rights of all dalits , tribals in india and to strictly work , legislate
laws as per the wishes , aspirations of people.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants of government of india and all state governments in the following cases to perform their duties.

To immediately reinstate Mr. Prabhakar Gwal , Chief Judicial Magistrate , Sukma , Chattisgarh into judicial service.
To make posting at the same place , same court of Sukma , so that he can complete the cases concerning the powers that be to the logical
end.
To initiate criminal legal prosecution against district collector , police officials , public servants who directly & indirectly interfered in the judicial
duties performed by Mr. GWAL.
To initiate criminal legal prosecution against Chhattisgarh High Court Judges who instead of upholding rule of law , supporting Mr. Gwal in his
duties took sides with criminal nexus , powers that be and repeatedly transferred him and now dismissed him from service without enquiry.
To reopen all the buried cases which were dealt by Mr. Gwal and buried by transfer of judge Mr. Gwal. To take action against ministers , public
servants involved in those cases.
To initiate criminal action against sukma district collector , police officials and Chhattisgarh High Court Judges on charges of Atrocities against
DALIT Mr. Gwal who was repeatedly harassed by them.
To initiate criminal prosecution under anti terror laws , against present and past chattisgarh state government ministers , central government
ministers , other state government ministers of jharkand , bihar , Andhra Pradesh , odisha , west Bengal , etc and police officials , public
servants of those governments who were and are responsible for creation of terror outfits like SALWA JUDUM , it’s recent terror child salwa
judum – 2 , Jharkhand mukti parishad , etc. These public servants have indulged in terror acts of salwa judum , other outfits by aiding &
sponsoring it , which is against law.
To immediately annul all the laws , orders passed by government of india , other state governments authorizing land acquisition ,
establishment of big industries , mines much against the wishes , aspirations of people.
To immediately annul Imposition of big projects on people by MPs , MLAs much against the resistance of people.
To order authorities to release lawyers , journalists who are illegally detained for legally supporting people seeking justice.
To immediately arrest , legally prosecute Mr.Ajit Doval for showing contempt of court , interfering , influencing the judicial process in the name
of discussion with judges. Government itself is the biggest litigant in the country.
To pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 06th May 2016……………………………………….. FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India………………………….. …………………..PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

22. PIL – Treat Police Constables Humanely
An Appeal to National Human Rights Commission of India and Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
1. Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.
2. Hon’ble Chairman , National Human Rights Commission of India

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
Police constables are also Human Beings and must be treated as such by superior officers and all.
As every other Human Being , police constables also has got human rights of equality , dignity of labor , equitable justice.
As Indian citizens police constables has constitutionally guaranteed rights of equality , equitable justice , etc.
Police constables are appointed , trained for the very specific purpose of maintaining law , order and detecting crimes.
When police constables are treated humanely by superiors and others , they will reciprocate the same.
Police constables are always under the threat of criminals , anti nationals , mafia. But they are not paid any compensation by government
when murdered by criminals , on the lines of soldiers becoming martyr during war.
Government has enacted laws enforcing equal pay for equal work , 1 earned leave for 20 working days , maximum of 8 working hours , one
paid weekly off after 48 working hours or 6 days , for all private & public sector employees. In case of urgency over time work can be allotted
to worker with his willingness ( not forced ) at the rate of double wages. For violation of these laws , labor department officials will prosecute
guilty company executives.
Since decades , police constables are not paid equal wages in comparison to their counterparts in other states and with people of their own
rank like teachers , electric line mans , etc in our state itself. Everyday they are forced to work beyond 8 hours without any additional wages.
Leaves are not sanctioned. They are addressed by first name in vulgar language by superior officers and forced to do menial jobs by superior
officers which are not part of police manual or service rules. Those who refuse to do it are dismissed by superior officers citing indiscipline.
Day in day out every second police constables are treated inhumanely by superior officers. POLICE CONSTABLES HUMAN RIGHTS ARE
VIOLATED by superior officers since decades. These police constables work under extreme psychological stress and some police constables
vent out their anger on innocents , suspects in lock up by using 3rd degree torture methods. Some other constables have fired at their
superior officers and some have gone to the extreme of committing suicide.
In the name of discipline , job security , the doors to legal redress of grievances are shut for police constables.
Till violation of Human Rights of Police Constables are not stopped , you can not stop human rights violations by police , 3rd degree torture of
innocents , lock up deaths by police.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Is it right for senior government officials , police officers , ministers , judges to violate HUMAN RIGHTS , CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS of
Police Constables ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , protection of constitutional rights , human rights of police constables and Prosecution of guilty judges , police
officers , IAS officers , ministers.

4. Averment:
Please read following cases at website mentioned below :

http://www.livelaw.in/tamil-nadu-judge-serves-memo-female-court-staff-not-washing-innerwear/ ,
http://www.deccanherald.com/content/115594/these-cops-much-abused-bosses.html ,

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties , to respect the Human Rights , Constitutional Rights of police
constables.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the chief secretaries of all stae governments , the concerned public servants in the present case , to perform their duties.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. To legally prosecute guilty judges , police officers , IAS officers , ministers and their family members who are ill treating ( under threat )
police constables and violating their human rights , constitutional rights.
d. To immediately ban colonial era system of providing police constables as orderlies to senior government officials , judges , ministers.
e. To immediately order respective state governments to pay over time pay to all police constables with back wages , over time wages since
their appointment till date.
f. To immediately order state governments to start process of police constables recruitment.
g. To give staggered weekly off to all police constables without fail.
h. To order state governments to strictly pay equal wages for equal work to all police constables in comparison to their counter parts in other
states and state government employees of their same rank in their own states.
i. To order state governments to pay compensation to police constables who die in the line of duty on par with military compensation.
j. To order state government to constitute district committees comprising of district head of police , doctor , psychiatrist , behavior specialist
and human rights expert , providing a forum for victimized police constables to air their grievances and in turn getting counseling , grievance
redress. This will go a long way in controlling 3rd degree torture of innocents by police , lock up deaths also.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 29th April 2016 …………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

23. PIL – Ban Orderly services performed by Police Constables , others
An Appeal to National Human Rights Commission of India and Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
1. Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.
2. Hon’ble Chairman , National Human Rights Commission of India

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
Police constables are appointed , trained for the very specific purpose of maintaining law , order and detecting crimes.
Dalayaths , peons in various state & central government departments are appointed , trained for the very specific purpose of assisting their
immediate superior in official duties.
Police constables , Peons , Dalayaths are PUBLIC SERVANTS / GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS paid from public exchequer to do public duties.
Police Constables , Peons , Dalayaths are Human Beings , deserve respect by all including their superiors.
Police Constables , Peons , Dalayaths are ill treated , they are treated as SLAVES / Bonded Labourers by their superior judges , police
officers , IAS officers , Ministers , etc. They are forced to do menial jobs (other than official duties ) like clearing night soil from sewage line ,
washing under wears , clothes of officer & his family members , polishing shoes of officers , their family members , washing clothes , cooking
utensils , etc.
If the officer & his family members are suffering from PARALYSIS or any other health problems which makes them unable to perform their
own work , then they can appoint private persons by paying from their personal pockets.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Is it right for senior government officials to force ( under threat ) their subordinate officials to do officer’s personal , private work ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , protection of constitutional rights , human rights of police constables , dalayaths , peons and Prosecution of
guilty judges , police officers , IAS officers , ministers.

4. Averment:
Please read following cases at website mentioned below :
http://www.livelaw.in/tamil-nadu-judge-serves-memo-female-court-staff-not-washing-innerwear/ ,
http://www.deccanherald.com/content/115594/these-cops-much-abused-bosses.html ,

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties , to respect the rights of police constables , dalayaths , peons. To
assign proper official duties to police constables , dalayaths & peons.

That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants in the present case , to perform their duties.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. To legally prosecute guilty judges , police officers , IAS officers , ministers and their family members who are ill treating ( under threat )
police constables , dalayaths , peons.
d. To immediately ban colonial era system of providing orderlies to senior government officials.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 20th April 2016 …………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

24. PIL – Justice Delayed & Justice Denied
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Justice of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:

a. Every human being , every Indian citizen are equal and guaranteed equitable justice as their human right and Constitutional right.
b. In india mafia of powers that be and government ensure that cases drag on for years , so that poor litigant either dies before judgement day
or opts out in the middle. Due to this delaying tactics , many poor people rather suffer injustice instead of seeking justice in courts. Mafia
indirectly forces them to keep away from litigation.
c. Due to occupation induced health problems my health is deteriorating day by day , some of the PILs concerning national security , public
welfare I have filed are two decades old , still no justice in sight. Judges not even admitted the cases.
d. Actual working hours , working days for judges are less in india. Too many case adjournments , less number of judges , too many holidays
for judges like summer vacation , winter vacation , working hours less than 8 hours per day , etc.
e. Judges work less but enjoy 5 star pay & perks at public expense.
f. Due to denial of justice common people suffer injustice for more time or till their death. Say some falsely implicated persons suffer in jail for
years till their acquittal by courts , some petty criminals whose crime attracts one year imprisonment suffers in jail for ten years. Because they
are not well connected , cann’t afford hi fi advocates , bail fees.
g. Due to lethargic judiciary , some land acquisition cases drag on for years land looser suffers also the project cost escalates by hundreds
thousands of crores of rupees.
h. The lethargic Judiciary in India itself is the biggest violator of common man’s human rights , fundamental rights. It is the culprit responsible
for loss of thousands of crores of rupees to public exchequer due to project cost escalations.
i. when a common man’s human rights , human rights is violated in the form of delaying tactics by court of law , judiciary , the presiding judge
becomes a criminal and liable to pay damages to the aggrieved.
j. The central government and state government yearly spend thousands of crores of rupees unnecessarily like purchasing new cars for
ministers , renovation , interior decorations of minister’s bungalows , foreign jaunts , etc. These are all not priority one spending. Out of these
spending how many more judges could be appointed , paid salaries.
k. when compared to project cost escalations of thousands of crores of rupees caused due to case delays , is it not wise on the part of
government to appoint requisite number of judges with additional budget burden of few crores of rupees.
l. Both central and state governments are the biggest litigants in the country.
m. Government is manipulating judicial process by denying finance to appoint more judges , to create more court infrastructures.
n. We common people are imposed with time limits to mandatorily comply with, in our interactions with other public , with government
authorities , with courts itself. For our failures we common people are penalized.
0. Paradoxically , there is no mandatory time limits for judges , public servants to finish specific works concerning public. In most of the cases
they adopt delaying tactics , deny justice still they are not penalized and don’t pay any compensation to the aggrieved public.
p. Due to delaying tactics of judges , many anti national crimes , terror attacks took place and still continuing which could have been well
averted in time if judges took timely action. For helping mafia by the way of delayed justice , mafia rewards some of those judges with post
retirement postings , promotions , site allotments , etc.
q. The Judiciary has the right , authority , power to order government to allocate finance for appointing judges , setting up court infrastructure.
If the government gives ruse of no money in it’s account , courts can definitely monitor spending of government , cut down on waste , nonpriority spending of government , divert such money for appointment of judges , court infrastructure development. No need for CJI to weep
before prime minister. Judges themselves never consider the sufferings of weeping litigants. It shows the weakness of CJI and a shame to
our nation.

We once again appeal to Honourable CJI , Supreme Court of India to take action on the following PILs , to answer the show cause notice and
to order the concerned public servants to answer RTI questions. The officials of SCI don’t even have etiquette , decorum to reply to our
letters. Some of my appeals are two decades old.
Remember the basic fact you are all enjoying 5 star pay , perks at the expense of public and owe your duty to public. Are not judges drawing
huge salaries , 5 star pay , perks on time without fail , on 01st of every month? Have they forgotten to take salary in 25 years , but they keep
cases pending for 20 - 25 years. CJI weeping before Prime Minister shows the weakness of the judiciary & a shame to the nation. Judges
never consider sufferings of weeping litigants in cases. Judges themselves are responsible for long pending cases.
Don’t refer the case to police as they don’t have power , authority to enquire high & mighty people , judges & previously they have failed and
the case is to subject some police officials , judges themselves to enquiry. Referring the case to police is nothing but attempt to bury the truth ,
only supreme court monitored transparent enquiry by CBI is right.
Delaying tactics of judges is only helping the criminals , anti nationals and terrorists. Please refer below mentioned sample cases of Justice
delayed for years to innocents , sufferings of their family members. No judges , police are bothered. Are not the the respective judges , police
guilty of defaming those innocent persons , spoiling their livelihood , gross violation of their civil rights ? why not those guilty judges , police

are paying compensation to victims of their wrong actions ? But the very same guilty judges , police are SHAMELESSLY enjoying 5 star pay
perks from public exchequer for decades.
Bail system , Parole system are in favour of rich crooks in india , cases of rich crooks move at faster pace wheeas the cases of poor which
are although older still continues. Judiciary , it’s system are biased. Consider the sample cases of sanjay dutt , salman khan , jayalaita. Our
judges , Police don’t have spine to enforce rule of law on rich crooks , while they put full force , might on poor innocents.
If anything untoward happens to me or to my dependents Chief Justice of India together with jurisdiction police & District Collector will be
responsible for it.
Rot in judiciary is decades old. Honourable CJI sir , weeping is not right constitution of india has given you the authority , TAKE ACTION DO
YOUR DUTY. People , History will remember you forever with respect. Anyway you are getting very good 5 star pay & perks , will also get
decent pension after retirement from government. First forget about post retirement postings , discretionary allotment of sites , etc from
government then you can work fearlessly. Both central & state governments are biggest litigants in the country , IAS babus make wrong
application , interpretation of laws leading to litigations. Start by clearing the rotten eggs within the judiciary. When judiciary & police in a
country strictly uphold law , work impartially that country surpasses even heaven.
Do remember on the D Day , in the Court of Almighty everybody CJI , Judges , prime ministers , common man alike has to bow his head. In
who’s court there is no match fixing , no techinicalities , no vociferous hi fi advocates , no bias based on caste , religion , region , community ,
etc , only straight simple account of wrongs & rights. Guess his judgement in your case. GOD BLESS US ALL.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Is it right for judges to deny justice . is it right on the part of judges to delay justice under various ruses to common man , violate their human
rights , fundamental rights.

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , Prosecution of judges , police , public servants responsible for case delays.

4. Averment:
Please read details at :
Honourable Chief Justice of India TAKE ACTION
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honourable-cji-take-action ,
https://www.scribd.com/doc/312858947/Honourable-CJI-Take-Action

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties & to answer the questions.
The Petitioner has sent many letters / appeals / petitions to supreme court of india & other courts through e-mail , DARPG website & through
regular mail requesting them to consider those as PILs. But none ofthem were admitted , even acknowledgement for receipts were not given.
See How duty conscious ,our judges are & see how our judges are sensitive towards life , liberty of citizens , common men & see how
careless our judges are towards anti national crimes , crimes worth crores of rupees. That the present petitioner has not filed any other
petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the concerned public servants , Tax Authorities , Law Enforcement Agencies , RBI authorities in the following cases to perform their duties &
to answer the below RTI questions.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. To legally prosecute responsible , concerned judges , police & public servants.
d. To cancel winter , summer vacation holidays for judges.
e. To bring down the holidays of courts per year to twelve on the lines of industrial establishments.

f. To make it mandatory for judges to conduct court hearings for 8 hours per day.
g. To bring down unnecessary court adjournments.
h. to reserve precious court timings only for arguments , cross examination of litigants , witnesses.
i. to use information technology , internet for issue of notices , summons and litigants submitting documents , applications instead of wasting
court time.
j. to introduce working of courts on shift basis in the same infrastructure.
k. to appoint retired judges immediately to bring down gaps in judges requirement.
l. to order the biggest litigant government of india and all state governments to frame laws strictly in accordance with constitution.
m. to order governments to give proper training for public servants , IAS officers , KAS officers , others about law of the land.
n. to make specific public servants personally responsible for wrong applications of law while discharging their duties and to make them pay
compensation from their personal pockets.
o. to order Chief Justice of India to pay compensation of Rupees TWO CRORES to Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi editor SOS e Clarion of
Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice , towards the damages he has suffered due to delayed justice.
p. to order the respective judges , police in all cases of case delays more specifically in the below mentioned cases to pay compensation to
innocent victims. Make a guideline for compensation payment. Legally prosecute guilty judges , police.
q. to frame a guideline for bail & parole procedure. When it is violated by judges , police , jail authorities , other public servants order them to
pay compensation and legally prosecute guilty judges , police , jail officials.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 08.06.2016……… ………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

25. PIL – Scams in Public Trusts
An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:
Trusts , Associations are ideally formed , funded by noble persons to work for achieving certain noble social objectives like education to
deprived , health care to poor , etc. Ideally these trusts enjoy the faith , confidence of public and collect donations from them to achieve their
stated objectives.
Of late , many NGOs , Trusts are formed by rich cunning people , corporate bodies solely to divert the black money. They lack accountability
to the public , donors. Religious , charitable trusts which are formed to propagate religious preaching indulge in business of establishing hi fi
medical , engineering colleges earning donations to the tune of millions of rupees every year. Most of the financial transactions of these trusts
takes place by cash payments without proper documentation to by pass legal scrutiny.
Many office bearers / founders of these trusts treat their trusts as their personal fiefdoms and spend the resources of trust for their personal hi
fi lifestyles. Administrative expenses of these trusts are much more than the expenses made towards the objectives of these trusts. There are
also possibilities of siphoning off money to illegal activities.
The tax exemptions given to these trusts by government are in essence a donation made by public exchequer to the very same trust to the
tune of tax amount if enforced. Government also gives land at concessional rates to these trusts , that subsidy amount is also a donation by
public exchequer to the trust. So , naturally functioning of all religious , charitable , educational , political trusts must be brought under the
ambit of RTI. A cap on administrative expenses of trusts must be enforced. Office bearers of trusts who violate the stated objectives of trusts
must be charged for public cheating & money must be recovered from them. Such trusts should be superseded and brought under the control
of government.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Why political trusts , religious trusts lack public accountability ? are they above law ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice.

4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the chief secretaries of all state governments , the concerned public servants in the present case , to perform their duties.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. to order all type of trusts to conduct their financial transactions through banks only.
d. to order all type of trusts to make their functioning public and to disclose their activities under RTI.

e. to order trusts not to indulge in activities other than the stated objectives of trust and not to spend trust money for the puroses other than
mentioned in the objectives.
f. to put a cap on the administarative expenses , office bearers expenses of trusts.
g. to initiate criminal charges against the office bearers of trusts who have misused , diverted trust resources and recover such money from
them with penal interest.
h. to supersede all the trusts which violate law and to bring thm under the control of government.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 13th July 2016 …………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

26. PIL – Release Mr.Shashidhar
An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India & National Human Rights Commission

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
Mr.Shashidhar , President of Karnataka Police Maha sangha , Bengaluru , Karnataka was planning to stage a state wide non violent
democratic protests pressing for protection of HUMAN RIGHTS , LABOR RIGHTS , CONSTITUTIONALLY GUARANTEED FUNDAMENTAL

RIGHTS of Police Constables , pressing for equal wages on parity with state government employees of same cadre in other departments of
government of Karnataka and on parity with police of other states.
MLAs , MPs raise their own pay , perks time & again with huge jumps without any fuss. But since decades , neglecting wages of police
constables in Karnataka state.
In democracy non violent protest is a way of attracting attention of the government to an important issue. It is not a crime. We have got
independence by protests of Mahatma Gandhi & others only. It is not a crime. Even “SEPOY MUTINY” is not considered as crime by true
Indians struggling for independence. It was considered as crime only by our oppressors , occupiers Britishers & their henchmen , stooges. We
Indians must SALUTE all soldiers who participated in sepoy mutiny paving the way for independence of india. Those people who consider
sepoy mutiny as a crime are real anti Indians , anti nationals.
Solely with the purpose of silencing the voice of Mr.Shashidhar seeking justice , better wages , right working conditions for police constables ,
government of Karnataka branded him as ANTI NATIONAL put him behind bars on sedition charges. Nowhere Mr.Shashidhar has questioned
the sovereignty , integrity of our nation , our constitution.
If government of Karnataka is true in it’s intention of catching ANTI NATIONALS , they can catch many anti nationals working within the police
, judiciary & government. In india police , intelligence officials are aiding , funding , training terrorist outfits in the guise of counter terrorism like
salwa judum , terrorist outfits in jammu kasmir , noth east india. Is it not anti national , illegal ? Read details at :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/release-mr-shashidhar ,

Free Mr. Shashidhar Karnataka Police Association Chief from Jail
- A Prisoner of Conscience

In Karnataka state working conditions of police constables is dismal. Human Rights , Labour Rights , Civil Rights of police constables
themselves are grossly violated by superior officers since decades. To their repeated appeals for justice , government is pretending to be deaf
, dumb & blind since decades. Inhuman work is extracted from Police constables under the threat of job loss , disciplinary proceedings. In turn
stressed up Police Constables vent their anger on hapless innocents , people from poor backgrounds by the way of 3rd degree torture , lock
up deaths , fake encounters , etc. Till we respect , protect HUMAN Rights of Police Constables , we can not expect police constables to
respect human rights of others.
Mr.Shashidhar , President of Karnataka Police Maha Sangha demanded the government to respect the human rights of police constables and
to pay them equal wages on par with their counter parts in other states. He also planned for a peaceful protest by the way of “Mass Leave by
Police Constables”. It is perfectly within democratic frame work. However government in it’s bid to silence his voice seeking justice , illegally
arrested him and charged him under sedition charges. Government has declared him as an Anti National. In essence , Mr. Shashidhar is a
perfect democrat & a law abiding Indian National , Citizen. On the other hand government of Karnataka is anti democratic and it’s act
constitutes gross human rights violations.
If at all government of Karnataka is interested in arresting Anti Nationals and legally prosecuting them , let them introspect itself first. There
are many anti nationals supporting terrorists , underworld within the government , public service , police & judiciary. Read sample cases at
following pages.
But those Anti Nationals within police , judiciary are roaming free , why double standards by Government of Karnataka ? Hereby , we urge
Government of Karnataka to immediately release Mr. Shashidhar from prison , to drop sedition charges against him and to formulate polices ,
work conditions for police constables strictly in accordance with law.
Bottom line : As per law in India , violation of Human Rights is a crime. Successive Chief Ministers , Home Ministers of Karnataka since
decades themselves are guilty of violating human rights of Police Constables , thereby they are criminals. Who is going to dare to bell the
cats?

2. Question(s) of Law:
Is demanding equal wages , better working conditions , protection of human rights of police constables a crime ? is a non violent democratic
protest a crime ? is it anti national ? is sepoy mutiny genesis of Indian freedom struggle a crime ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice. Protection of Human Rights of Karnataka Police Constables.

4. Averment:

Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the chief secretaries of all stae governments , the concerned public servants in the present case , to perform their duties.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. to order government of Karnataka to immediately release Mr. Shashidhar from jail , to drop sedition charges against him and to pay him
compensation.
d. to order all Ministers in Government of Karnataka Cabinet & Police DGP , IGPs , SPs to read Indian history to know the importance of
sepoy mutiny in our freedom struggle and to read United Nations Human Rights Charter.
e. To order Karnataka state government to pay equal wages to all police constables in parity with Karnataka state government employees of
same cadre in other departments.
f. To order government of Karnataka to limit working hours of police constables to 8 hours a day with a paid weekly off.
g. to order government of Karnataka to immediately ban using police constables as domestic helps , orderlies by superior officers & others.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 23rd July 2016 …………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

27. PIL – Release DRINKING WATER from Mahadayi River
An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India & National Human Rights Commission

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.

OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Cabinet Secretary , Government of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
Every human being needs drinking water to survive and every Human Being has got Human Right to Live by virtue of his birth itself. Without
access to drinking water human beings cann’t survive , they will die. Therefore Human Right to Drinking water forms integral part of
Human Right to Live. United Nations has also affirmed Human Right to Safe Drinking Water to every human being.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Is not denial of Drinking water from Mahadayi / Mandovi River to people in northern Karnataka , a crime by government of india &
government of Karnataka ?
Is not police brutality against people demanding drinking water and police brutality against women , aged persons , children , pregnant
women in Navalgund , Yamanoor of Karnataka a crime by Karnataka police ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice. Protection of Human Rights of Karnataka People , specifically protection of their human rights to life &
drinking water.

4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the Union Cabinet Secretary , Government of India , chief secretaries of all state governments , the concerned public servants in the
present case , to perform their duties.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. to order government of Karnataka to ensure supply of drinking water from Mahadayi / Mandovi River to people living in northern
Karnataka .
d. to order Government of India and other riparian states to ensure drinking water to all people.
e. to order government of Karnataka , to initiate legal prosecution of Karnataka police personnel who committed excesses on women folk ,
children , aged persons in navalgund , yamanoor of Karnataka state during protest demanding water from mahadayi river.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 03rd August 2016 …………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

28 . PIL – Repeal Armed Forces Special Powers Act ( AFSPA )
An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India & National Human Rights Commission

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.

OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Cabinet Secretary , Government of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
ARMED FORCES SPECIAL POWERS ACT ( AFSPA ) which is in force in north eastern states of india , Jammu & Kashmir is grossly
violating human rights of civilians and aiding police , security personnel to commit crimes against humanity without accountability.
Even after 69 years of independence of india , government of india and state governments are using AFSPA to run day to day
administration in above mentioned states. It proves both GOI & state governments have failed to democratically connect to people. There is
historical wrongdoing at the time of annexation of these states into Indian republic. People’s opinion was not cared for at the time of
independence , whether they want to be part of Indian union or not. Decision was imposed on them not democratically made , people were
not convinced in a democratic manner. For the people of these states oppression still continues even after independence , only difference
is oppressors have changed, previously they were britishers now it is delhi based Indians. Corrupt public servants of GOI & state
governments have failed to take the government schemes to common people in earnest and failed to protect people’s democratic
rights. The MLAs , MPs , Ministers are after power not to serve people but to make money. By imposing AFSPA , GOI and state
governments are ruling with hand of terror. Police & security personnel are behaving just like terrorists , committing crimes against civilians
with impunity without accountability. It is failure of democracy.
As per media reports, tens of thousands of civilians were killed and still being killed in fake encounters , lock ups , thousands of civilians
illegally detained wrongly charged by police , security personnel. No legal prosecution of security personnel , police for their wrong doings ,
crimes. Police and security personnel are nothing but terrorists in uniform.
People are disillusioned and it is a fertile ground for raise of terrorist , separatist outfits. Some people view separatist leaders as their
saviors. This faith is also misplaced. Terrorist leaders want a separate nation so that they can become ministers in the new government
and make money by corrupt means.

Even till date , manipuris and others from north east india who are studying / working in other parts of india are looked down upon , viewed
as foreigners with suspicion and ill treated , manhandled by other Indians. They don’t view them as their brothers , fellow countrymen.
Problem also lies with the attitude of our society.
Real need of the hour is TRUE DEMOCRACY with full people’s participation and transparency , accountability in governance. When
compared to all other forms of governance DEMOCRACY is the best. However pillar stones of democracy are honesty , integrity of people’s
representatives , transparency in their actions.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are Indian Military personnel & Police above Law ? why democracy , democratic rights , human rights being denied to people of north east
india , jammu & Kashmir , since decades ? Is it not failure of governance by GOI ?

3. Grounds:
People of North eastern states of India , Jammu & Kashmir constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights and Human Rights .

4. Averment:
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the Union Cabinet Secretary , Government of India , chief secretaries of all state governments , the concerned public servants in the
present case , to perform their duties.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
d. to annul Armed Forces Special Powers Act which makes Indian Military Personnel & Police unaccountable for their actions.
e. to severely punish terrorists who are disturbing the peace in the country and on the same footing severely punish Indian Military
Personnel , Police who are committing crimes against innocent civilians under the shelter of AFSPA.
f. to order GOI not to support any terrorist outfits as part of it’s counter terrorism drive.
g. to reopen all past cases of fake encounters , lock up deaths , disappearances and illegal detention of innocent civilians.
h. to investigate all those cases by a team comprising human rights activists , local residents and to legally prosecute guilty Indian security
personnel & police.
i. to order GOI to set up a corpus to pay compensation to victims of terrorism by security personnel.
j. to dismiss guilty security personnel from duty , to recover money from their salary , pension , personal property towards the
compensation corpus.
k. to release & drop all charges against all human rights activists including Ms. Irom Sharmila.
l. to order GOI , state governments to educate people about benefits of democracy , RTI Act , filing a Public Interset Litigation ( PIL ) to seek
justice , etc.
m. to order GOI & state governments , to allocate adequate financial and other resources to these states , to set up educational
institutions , primary health centres , drinking water facilities , electic supply , roads and other basic necessities to all villages. It is being
denied since decades.
n. to order GOI & state governments , to set up transparent , accountable , vibrant lokayuktas / Vigilance commissions in north east states of
india , Jammu & Kashmir , to handle corruption charges against public servants on fast track basis.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 06th August 2016 …………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.

Place : Mysuru , India…………………….

PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

29. PIL – Release DRINKING WATER from Mahadayi River
An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India & National Human Rights Commission

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.

OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
.....Petitioner

Versus

Honourable Cabinet Secretary , Government of India & Others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
Every human being needs drinking water to survive and every Human Being has got Human Right to Live by virtue of his birth itself.
Without access to drinking water human beings cann’t survive , they will die. Therefore Human Right to Drinking water forms integral
part of Human Right to Live. United Nations has also affirmed Human Right to Safe Drinking Water to every human being.
2. Question(s) of Law:
Is not denial of Drinking water from Mahadayi / Mandovi River to people in northern Karnataka , a crime by government of india &
government of Karnataka ?
Is not police brutality against people demanding drinking water and police brutality against women , aged persons , children , pregnant
women in Navalgund , Yamanoor of Karnataka a crime by Karnataka police ?

3. Grounds:

Requests for equitable justice. Protection of Human Rights of Karnataka People , specifically protection of their human rights to life &
drinking water.

4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the Union Cabinet Secretary , Government of India , chief secretaries of all state governments , the concerned public servants in the
present case , to perform their duties.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. to order government of Karnataka to ensure supply of drinking water from Mahadayi / Mandovi River to people living in northern
Karnataka .
d. to order Government of India and other riparian states to ensure drinking water to all people.
e. to order government of Karnataka , to initiate legal prosecution of Karnataka police personnel who committed excesses on women folk ,
children , aged persons in navalgund , yamanoor of Karnataka state during protest demanding water from mahadayi river.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 03rd August 2016 …………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India……………………. PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

30. PIL – Store DRINKING WATER in Cauvery KRS reservoir
An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India & National Human Rights Commission

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.
IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner
Versus
a. Honourable Cabinet Secretary , Government of India
b. Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka
c. Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Tamilnadu
d. Justice Deepak Mishra , SCI

OF 2016

e. Justice U.U Lalit , SCI and others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.
To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1. Facts of the case:
Every human being needs drinking water to survive and every Human Being has got Human Right to Live by virtue of his birth itself.
Without access to drinking water human beings cann’t survive , they will die. Therefore Human Right to Drinking water forms integral
part of Human Right to Live. United Nations has also affirmed Human Right to Safe Drinking Water to every human being.
The said agreement regarding sharing of Cauvery water by british presidency with Rulers of Mysore Kingdom decades ago is biased in
favor of state of tamil nadu.
Even decades after independence of india , why should we stick to british era agreement instead of drawing our own mutual agreement
based on present needs.
When a judge presiding in a case even if remotely associated with any of the parties must withdraw from the case paving the way for a
neutral judge. This is to prove to the public that justice is not merely delivered but publicly shown to be delivered.
Judges are not subject experts in irrigation , engineering , rain calculation , etc. without taking the expert opinion , conducting ground
assessment judges have recently made orders to release Cauvery river water to tamilnadu state.
While sharing a river water TOP PRIORITY must be DRINKING WATER for all parties concerned. Second comes irrigation. Here too it
must be on equal footing first round of water for all parties for first crop , after completion of first round second round must commence for
all parties. However here one party is given water for two crops other is denied water even for TOP PRIRITY DRINKING let alone for crop
irrigation. It is unjust.
Lot of confusion is being created by contradictory statements made out by contesting parties , governments regarding the water stored in
their reservoirs. Till date why not SCI has deputed an impartial expert tem to assess the actual stored water in reservoirs , their actual needs ,
rain fall expected , their contingency plans in case of rain fall failure , etc. To make expert’s report public so that public in all the states will
know the truth , law & order , peace will prevail.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Is not denial of Drinking water from Cauvery river to people in Karnataka , a crime by supreme court judges Justice Deepak Mishra ,
Justice U.U . Lalit , government of india , government of Tamilnadu & government of Karnataka ?
Supreme court definitely has jurisdiction to safeguard human rights of people , to ensure drinking water to all parties but Does the supreme
court has jurisdiction to order parties to release water for irrigation , etc ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice. Protection of Human Rights of Karnataka People , specifically protection of their human rights to life &
drinking water.
4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties.

That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.
PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the Union Cabinet Secretary , Government of India , chief secretaries of all state governments , the concerned public servants in the
present case , to perform their duties.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. to order government of Karnataka to ensure supply of drinking water from Cauvery River to people living in Karnataka and thereby protect
their human rights. .
d. to order Government of India and other riparian states to ensure drinking water to all people.
e. to annul the present biased Cauvery river sharing agreement between Karnataka , tamilnadu state and to constitute expert committee to
arrive at a scientific formula to ensure drinking water to all parties concerned. To make that expert’s report public.
f. As SCI doesn’t have jurisdiction to interfere in river sharing , to order government of india to arrange a conciliatory meeting between the
parties.
FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.

Dated : 13th September 2016 …………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India…………………….

PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

31. PIL - Biased Judges , Biased Judgement in Mahadayi , Cauvery Dispute
An Appeal to Honourable Supreme Court of India & National Human Rights Commission for DRINKING WATER and EQUAL share of
water to Karnataka People

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

a. Honourable Cabinet Secretary , Government of India
b. Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka
c. Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Tamilnadu
d. Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Goa
e. Justice Deepak Mishra , SCI
f. Justice U.U Lalit , SCI and others

OF 2016

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1. Facts of the case:
Our whole hearted respects to honest few in judiciary , parliament & public service. Our salutes to them , due to honest efforts of those few
noble persons only at least democracy is surviving in India.
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police ,
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
We respect the honest few in judiciary , police , parliament and other public services. Our whole hearted respects , salutes to them. We
despise the corrupt. Sadly , criminalization of judiciary , police , politics has taken place in india. , just like the forwarning of Mr.Churchill.
Throughout this petiton the term “ JUDGE” includes all public servants performing quasi judicial & judicial functions. Judges are from the
same society which is full of corruption , favoritism , caste bias , etc. Judges are also human beings who can fall prey to lure of bribes ,
favours , etc. They are neither gods nor monks. Also , like other human beings , they also make errors. Many persons get selected as
judges based on other criteria than merit , integrity , honesty. See the scandals of KPSC , VYAPAM and mysterious supreme court
collegiums system. Total lack of transparency in functioning of judges. Even when cases of national security , crimes by judges were
brought before SCI no action , no answer to RTI questions. When life of human rights activist , journalist is under threat SCI doesn’t take
any action rather government tries to silence him by police force. When land grabbings , lake encroachments , etc were brought to the
notice of SCI at the initial stages , so that it can stop the crime. But the SCI didn’t act & let the crime happen , it is continuing till date. SCI
judges may be indirectly in league with MAFIA. Therefore , NEVER A JUDGEMENT IS ALWAYS RIGHT . Some judgements are right
and some biased.
Every human being needs drinking water to survive and every Human Being has got Human Right to Live by virtue of his birth itself.
Without access to drinking water human beings cann’t survive , they will die. Therefore Human Right to Drinking water forms integral
part of Human Right to Live. United Nations has also affirmed Human Right to Safe Drinking Water to every human being.
The said agreement regarding sharing of Cauvery water by british presidency with Rulers of Mysore Kingdom decades ago is biased in
favor of state of tamil nadu.
Even decades after independence of india , why should we stick to british era agreement instead of drawing our own mutual agreement
based on present needs of equality.
When a judge presiding in a case even if remotely associated with any of the parties must withdraw from the case paving the way for a
neutral judge. This is to prove to the public that justice is not merely delivered but publicly shown to be delivered.
Judges are not subject experts in irrigation , engineering , rain calculation , etc. without taking the expert opinion , conducting ground
assessment judges have recently made orders to release Cauvery river water to tamilnadu state.
While sharing a river water TOP PRIORITY must be DRINKING WATER for all parties concerned. Second comes irrigation. Here too it
must be on equal footing first round of water for all parties for first crop , after completion of first round second round must commence for
all parties. However here one party is given water for two crops other is denied water even for TOP PRIRITY DRINKING let alone for crop
irrigation. It is unjust.
Lot of confusion is being created by contradictory statements made out by contesting parties , governments regarding the water stored in
their reservoirs. Till date why not SCI has deputed an impartial expert team to assess the actual stored water in reservoirs , their actual
needs , rain fall expected , their contingency plans in case of rain fall failure , etc. To make expert’s report public so that public in all the states
will know the truth , law & order , peace will prevail.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Is not denial of drinking water to people of north Karnataka from mahadayi river a crime by supreme court judges ?
Is not denial of Drinking water from Cauvery river to people in Karnataka , a crime by supreme court judges Justice Deepak Mishra ,
Justice U.U . Lalit , government of india , government of Tamilnadu & government of Karnataka ?
Supreme court definitely has jurisdiction to safeguard human rights of people , to ensure drinking water to all parties but Does the supreme
court has jurisdiction to order parties to release water for irrigation , etc ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , equal share of water and drinking water at the earliest.. Protection of Human Rights of Karnataka People ,
specifically protection of their human rights to life & drinking water.

4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the Union Cabinet Secretary , Government of India , chief secretaries of all state governments , the concerned public servants in the
present case , to perform their duties.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. to order government of Karnataka to ensure supply of drinking water from Cauvery River to people living in Karnataka and thereby protect
their human rights. .
d. to order Government of India and other riparian states to ensure drinking water to all people.
e. to annul the present biased Cauvery river sharing agreement between Karnataka , tamilnadu state and to constitute expert committee to
arrive at a scientific formula to ensure drinking water to all parties concerned. To make that expert’s report public.
f. As SCI doesn’t have jurisdiction to interfere in river sharing , to order government of india to arrange a conciliatory meeting between the
parties.
g. to immediately post all the Cauvery , mahadayi , Krishna river disputes related cases to court of neutral judges of supreme court of
india who are not even remotely associated to contesting parties.
h. to criminally prosecute respective supreme court judges who have denied drinking water to people of Karnataka from mahadayi &
Cauvery rivers , for violation of human rights & fundamental rights. Make public the asset details , career growth details of theses judges &
their family members public.
i. after releasing all the water from KRS dam , In case of rain failure the water is not sufficient for drinking purposes till next monsoon.
In such case supreme court must arrange for supply of drinking water to people of Karnataka at the expense of government of india &
government of tamilnadu.
j. As per supreme court’s directive / Mahadayi Tribunal Karnataka people are not allowed to draw drinking water from mahadayi river and is
flowing to goa finally to be wasted. Supreme court must immediately arrange for supply of drinking water to people of north Karnataka at
the expense of government of india & goa.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.
Dated : 21st September 2016 …………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India…………………….

PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

32. PIL - Impeach Judges Deepak Mishra , UU Lalit for Contempt
An Appeal to H.E.Honourable President of India , Honourable Supreme Court of India & National Human Rights Commission

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.

OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

a. Honourable Cabinet Secretary , Government of India
b. Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Karnataka
c. Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Tamilnadu
d. Honourable Chief Secretary , Government of Goa
e. Justice Deepak Mishra , SCI
f. Justice U.U Lalit , SCI and others
....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 and other relevant acts OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1.

Facts of the case:

Principle “Live and Let Live” must be practiced by ALL before preaching.
Federal structure of india must be respected by all state governments. During distribution of water by judicial authorities and during
distribution of central government grants by GOI they must first keep it in mind. All states are equal.
Contempt of citizens of india (specifically people of Karnataka) by supreme court judges Deepk Mishra and UU Lalit.
Contempt of Karnataka Legislature by supreme court judges Deepak Mishra and UU Lalit.
Contempt of constitution of india and supreme court of india by judges Deepak Mishra and UU Lalit.

Violation of human rights of Karnataka people by judges Deepak Mishra and UU Lalit.
Violation of oath of office by judges Deepak Mishra and UU Lalit.
In Democratic Republic of India Constitution of india and citizens of india are supreme.
In our democracy nobody is supreme nor inferior, everybody are equals .
Various constitutional institutions are mandated by constitution , to perform specific duties within their domains .
All the constitutional bodies , all constitutional functionaries including supreme court of india , judges Deepak Mishra & UU Lalit are mandated
by constitution to serve the public NOT to master over them. They are all PUBLIC SERVANTS taking pay & perks from public exchequer
ie our public’s money.
All natural resources including river Cauvery must be shared in equitable manner by all stake holders.
Drinking water for living beings is a must for survival. It is an issue of life & death.
Therefore right to drinking water is a basic human right and must be priority number one.
For a farmer irrigation of land is a source of his family’s living. It is his Right to Livlihood.
Giving water to tamilnadu farmers to grow three crops where as denying water to Karnataka farmers to grow even a single crop is denial
of right to livelihood of Karnataka farmers.
Sharing of water between all states , all stake holders must be on an equal footing.
Human Rights must be respected by one and all including supreme court of india and judges Deepak Mishra and UU Lalit.
Without conducting physical examination of Cauvery reservoirs , taking expert observations by third parties , passing orders in a
whimsical way sitting at far away delhi is gross injustice to all stake holders of river Cauvery.
Since centuries Tamilnadu in it’s greed is over using , snatching away lions share of river Cauvery than all other stake holders. Even
during times of distress , failure of rains , they want their pound of flesh like shylock. Tamilnadu readily shares the bounty but not ready to
share the hardships. Is it federalism ? is it live let live ?
When people of Karnataka suffer hardships or die without drinking water , Supreme court of india specifically Judges Deepak Mishra , UU
Lalit and Government of Tamilnadu specifically chief minister Jayalalita are responsible , liable to pay compensation at actuals. They are
also responsible to make alternative arrangements for drinking water if the need arise. If the rain gods lets us down.
When Cauvery basin farmers of Karnataka suffer hardships or loss crops or unable to take three crops like tamilnadu counterparts ,
due to denial of Cauvery water , Supreme court of india specifically Judges Deepak Mishra , UU Lalit and Government of Tamilnadu
specifically chief minister Jayalalita are responsible , liable to pay compensation at actuals.
We people of Karnataka and government of Karnataka are paying taxes to the government of india on an equal footing with other states
including government of tamilnadu. Still for infrastructure developments , for rehabilitation during drought , natural calamities government
of Karnataka is not getting GOI grants on an equal footing with government of tamilnadu since decades. Has GOI , SCI forgotten
federalism , live let live principle in these times?
As per Constitution of India , judiciary is not mandated , authorized to adjudicate on matters relating to inter state water disputes. Judicial
involvement in this issue is unconstitutional , null and void. This basic constitutional question is pending before three judge bench of
supreme court of india. Still supreme court judges Deepak Mishra and UU Lalit are giving their whimsical orders one after another without
any sound reasoning or logic and beyond the scope of prayer in the original application before it. By these acts the said judges are
making contempt of constitution of india , contempt of supreme court of india , contempt of Indian parliament / Karnataka legislature and
contempt of citizens of india.
Our whole hearted respects to honest few in judiciary , parliament & public service. Our salutes to them , due to honest efforts of those few
noble persons only at least democracy is surviving in India.
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police ,
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
We respect the honest few in judiciary , police , parliament and other public services. Our whole hearted respects , salutes to them. We
despise the corrupt. Sadly , criminalization of judiciary , police , politics has taken place in india. , just like the forwarning of Mr.Churchill.
Throughout this petiton the term “ JUDGE” includes all public servants performing quasi judicial & judicial functions. Judges are from the
same society which is full of corruption , favoritism , caste bias , etc. Judges are also human beings who can fall prey to lure of bribes ,
favours , etc. They are neither gods nor monks. Also , like other human beings , they also make errors. Many persons get selected as
judges based on other criteria than merit , integrity , honesty. See the scandals of KPSC , VYAPAM and mysterious supreme court
collegiums system. Total lack of transparency in functioning of judges. Even when cases of national security , crimes by judges were
brought before SCI no action , no answer to RTI questions. When life of human rights activist , journalist is under threat SCI doesn’t take

any action rather government tries to silence him by police force. When land grabbings , lake encroachments , etc were brought to the
notice of SCI at the initial stages , so that it can stop the crime. But the SCI didn’t act & let the crime happen , it is continuing till date. SCI
judges may be indirectly in league with MAFIA. Therefore , NEVER A JUDGEMENT IS ALWAYS RIGHT . Some judgements are right
and some biased.
Every human being needs drinking water to survive and every Human Being has got Human Right to Live by virtue of his birth itself.
Without access to drinking water human beings cann’t survive , they will die. Therefore Human Right to Drinking water forms integral
part of Human Right to Live. United Nations has also affirmed Human Right to Safe Drinking Water to every human being.
The said agreement regarding sharing of Cauvery water by british presidency with Rulers of Mysore Kingdom decades ago is biased in
favor of state of tamil nadu.
Even decades after independence of india , why should we stick to british era agreement instead of drawing our own mutual agreement
based on present needs of equality.
When a judge presiding in a case even if remotely associated with any of the parties must withdraw from the case paving the way for a
neutral judge. This is to prove to the public that justice is not merely delivered but publicly shown to be delivered.
Judges are not subject experts in irrigation , engineering , rain calculation , etc. without taking the expert opinion , conducting ground
assessment judges have recently made orders to release Cauvery river water to tamilnadu state.
While sharing a river water TOP PRIORITY must be DRINKING WATER for all parties concerned. Second comes irrigation. Here too it
must be on equal footing first round of water for all parties for first crop , after completion of first round second round must commence for
all parties. However here one party is given water for two crops other is denied water even for TOP PRIRITY DRINKING let alone for crop
irrigation. It is unjust.
Lot of confusion is being created by contradictory statements made out by contesting parties , governments regarding the water stored in
their reservoirs. Till date why not SCI has deputed an impartial expert team to assess the actual stored water in reservoirs , their actual
needs , rain fall expected , their contingency plans in case of rain fall failure , etc. To make expert’s report public so that public in all the states
will know the truth , law & order , peace will prevail.

2. Question(s) of Law:
Is not denial of drinking water to people of north Karnataka from mahadayi river a crime by supreme court judges ?
Is not denial of Drinking water from Cauvery river to people in Karnataka , a crime by supreme court judges Justice Deepak Mishra ,
Justice U.U . Lalit , government of india , government of Tamilnadu & government of Karnataka ?
Supreme court definitely has jurisdiction to safeguard human rights of people , to ensure drinking water to all parties but Does the supreme
court has jurisdiction to order parties to release water for irrigation , etc ?
Is not denial of water from Cauvery river to farmers in Karnataka for irrigation , a crime by supreme court judges Justice Deepak
Mishra , Justice U.U . Lalit , government of india , government of Tamilnadu & government of Karnataka ? is it not denial of Right to
Livlihood of cauvery basin Karnataka farmers.

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice , equal share of water and drinking water at the earliest.. Protection of Human Rights of Karnataka People ,
specifically protection of their human rights to life , livelihood & drinking water.

4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties.

That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the Union Cabinet Secretary , Government of India , chief secretaries of all state governments , the concerned public servants in the
present case , to perform their duties.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.
c. to order government of Karnataka to ensure supply of drinking water from Cauvery River to people living in Karnataka and thereby protect
their human rights. .
d. to order Government of India and other riparian states to ensure drinking water to all people.
e. to annul the present biased Cauvery river sharing agreement between Karnataka , tamilnadu state and to constitute expert committee to
arrive at a scientific formula to ensure drinking water to all parties concerned. To make that expert’s report public.
f. As SCI doesn’t have jurisdiction to interfere in river sharing , to order government of india to arrange a conciliatory meeting between the
parties.
g. to immediately post all the Cauvery , mahadayi , Krishna river disputes related cases to court of neutral judges of supreme court of
india who are not even remotely associated to contesting parties.
h. to criminally prosecute respective supreme court judges who have denied drinking water to people of Karnataka from mahadayi &
Cauvery rivers , for violation of human rights & fundamental rights. Make public the asset details , career growth details of theses judges &
their family members public.
i. after releasing all the water from KRS dam , In case of rain failure the water is not sufficient for drinking purposes till next monsoon.
In such case supreme court must arrange for supply of drinking water to people of Karnataka at the expense of government of india &
government of tamilnadu.
j. As per supreme court’s directive / Mahadayi Tribunal Karnataka people are not allowed to draw drinking water from mahadayi river and is
flowing to goa finally to be wasted. Supreme court must immediately arrange for supply of drinking water to people of north Karnataka at
the expense of government of india & goa.
k. Immediately transfer Cauvery dispute case before supreme court bench of judges Deepak Mishra and UU Lalit , to a neutral bench of
judges till the constitutional question of judicial involvement in water dispute is settled by three judge bench of supreme court of india.
l. Initiate criminal prosecution of judges Deepak Mishra and UU Lalit for contempt of constitution , parliament , Karnataka legislature ,
supreme court of india and citizens of india. Impeach them from their judicial offices before they commit more misuses of office.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.
Dated : 02nd october 2016 …………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India…………………….

PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

33. PIL - CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDGES
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

Supreme Court of India and Government of india
....Respondents

OF 2016

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 and other relevant acts OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :
1.

Facts of the case:

The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others , public to emulate & follow. if a student makes a
mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same mistake.
if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-free under his
patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the aggrieved. just
think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the land himself commits crime - violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights & human rights
of public and obstructs the public from performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ?
it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power , criminals in public service to commit more crimes. that is exactly what is
happening in india. the educated public must raise to the occasion & peacefully , democratically must oppose this criminalization of judiciary ,
public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.
Day after day we are seeing allegations against judges in crimes against women , sex crimes , judicial orders for money , etc in the media.
There is total secrecy in the functioning of judiciary in india with regards to disciplinary proceedings , promotions and selection of judges.
We the public don’t know whether proper investigation / enquiry is done in such cases of allegations against judges , what action taken
against the guilty judges ?
Hereby , we demand code of conduct for judges with provision of criminal prosecution of violators.
Regard for the public welfare is the highest law (SALUS POPULI EST SUPREMA LEX).
No man shall be condemned unheard (AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM).
No man can be judge in his own cause (NEMO DEBET ESSE JUDEX IN PROPRIA SUA CAUSA).
An act of the Court shall prejudice no man (ACTUS CURIAE NEMINEM GRAVABIT).

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are JUDGES above law ?

3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice and legal prosecution of guilty judges to uphold rule of law in india.
I wish to state you humbly that the United States Courts have framed the following rules for judges:CANON 1: A JUDGE SHOULD UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY
An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society. A judge should maintain and enforce high standards of
conduct and should personally observe those standards, so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved. The
provisions of this Code should be construed and applied to further that objective.
COMMENTARY
Deference to the judgments and rulings of courts depends on public confidence in the integrity and independence of judges. The integrity and
independence of judges depend in turn on their acting without fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they must comply with
the law and should comply with this Code.
Adherence to this responsibility helps to maintain public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary. Conversely, violation of this Code
diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and injures our system of government under law.
CANON 2: A JUDGE SHOULD AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL ACTIVITIES
A. Respect for Law. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence
in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

B. Outside Influence. A judge should not allow family, social, political, financial, or other relationships to influence judicial conduct or judgment.
A judge should neither lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge or others nor convey or permit others
to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge. A judge should not testify voluntarily as a character witness.
C. Nondiscriminatory Membership. A judge should not hold membership in any organization that practices invidious discrimination on the
basis of race, sex, religion, or national origin.
COMMENTARY
Canon 2A. An appearance of impropriety occurs when reasonable minds, with knowledge of all the relevant circumstances disclosed by a
reasonable inquiry, would conclude that the judge’s honesty, integrity, impartiality, temperament, or fitness toserve as a judge is impaired.
Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judges. A judge must avoid all impropriety and
appearance of impropriety. This prohibition applies to both professional and personal conduct. A judge must expect to be the subject of
constant public scrutiny and accept freely and willingly restrictions that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen. Because it is
not practicable to list all prohibited acts, the prohibition is necessarily cast in general terms that extend to conduct by judges that is harmful
although not specifically mentioned in the Code. Actual improprieties under this standard include violations of law, court rules, or other specific
provisions of this Code.
Canon 2B. Testimony as a character witness injects the prestige of the judicial office into the proceeding in which the judge testifies and may
be perceived as an official testimonial. A judge should discourage a party from requiring the judge to testify as a character witness except in
unusual circumstances when the demands of justice require. This Canon does not create a privilege against testifying in response to an
official summons.
A judge should avoid lending the prestige of judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge or others. For example, a judge should
not use the judge’s judicial position or title to gain advantage in litigation involving a friend or a member of the judge’s family. In contracts for
publication of a judge’s writings, a judge should retain control over the advertising to avoid exploitation of the judge’s office.
A judge should be sensitive to possible abuse of the prestige of office. A judge should not initiate communications to a sentencing judge or a
probation or corrections officer but may provide information to such persons in response to a formal request. Judges may participate in the
process of judicial selection by cooperating with appointing authorities and screening committees seeking names for consideration and by
responding to official inquiries concerning a person being considered for a judgeship.
Canon 2C. Membership of a judge in an organization that practices invidious discrimination gives rise to perceptions that the judge’s
impartiality is impaired. Canon 2C refers to the current practices of the organization. Whether an organization practices invidious
discrimination is often a complex question to which judges should be sensitive. The answer cannot be determined from a mere examination of
an organization’s current membership rolls but rather depends on how the organization selects members and other relevant factors, such as
that the organization is dedicated to the preservation of religious, ethnic or cultural values of legitimate common interest to its members, or
that it is in fact and effect an intimate, purely private organization whose membership limitations could not be constitutionally prohibited.
CANON 3: A JUDGE SHOULD PERFORM THE DUTIES OF THE OFFICE FAIRLY, IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY
The duties of judicial office take precedence over all other activities. In performing the duties prescribed by law, the judge should adhere to
the following standards:
.A Adjudicative Responsibilities.
(1) A judge should be faithful to, and maintain professional competence in, the law and should not be swayed by partisan interests, public
clamor, or fear of criticism.
(2) A judge should hear and decide matters assigned, unless disqualified, and should maintain order and decorum in all judicial proceedings.
(3)A judge should be patient, dignified, respectful, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom the judge deals
in an official capacity. A judge should require similar conduct of those subject to the judge’s control, including lawyers to the extent consistent
with their role in the adversary process.
(4) A judge should accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, and that person’s lawyer, the full right to be heard
according to law. Except as set out below, a judge should not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications or consider other
communications concerning a pending or impending matter that are made outside the presence of the parties or their lawyers. If a judge
receives an unauthorized ex parte communication bearing on the substance of a matter, the judge should promptly notify the parties of the
subject matter of the communication and allow the parties an opportunity to respond, if requested. A judge may:
(a) initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications as authorized by law;
(b) when circumstances require it, permit ex parte communication for scheduling, administrative, or emergency purposes, but only if the ex
parte communication does not address substantive matters and the judge reasonably believes that no party will gain a procedural,
substantive, or tactical advantage as a result of the ex parte communication;
(c) obtain the written advice of a disinterested expert on the law, but only after giving advance notice to the parties of the person to be
consulted and the subject matter of the advice and affording the parties reasonable opportunity to object and respond to the notice and to the
advice received; or
(d) with the consent of the parties, confer separately with the parties and their counsel in an effort to mediate or settle pending matters.
(5) A judge should dispose promptly of the business of the court.
(6) A judge should not make public comment on the merits of a matter pending or impending in any court. A judge should require similar
restraint by court personnel subject to the judge’s direction and control. The prohibition on public comment on the merits does not extend to

public statements made in the course of the judge’s official duties, to explanations of court procedures, or to scholarly presentations made for
purposes of legal education.
Administrative Responsibilities. (1) A judge should diligently discharge administrative responsibilities, maintain professional competence in
judicial administration, and facilitate the performance of the administrative responsibilities of other judges and court personnel.
(2) A judge should not direct court personnel to engage in conduct on the judge’s behalf or as the judge’s representative when that conduct
would contravene the Code if undertaken by the judge. (3) A judge should exercise the power of appointment fairly and only on the basis of
merit, avoiding unnecessary appointments, nepotism, and favoritism. A judge should not approve compensation of appointees beyond the fair
value of services rendered.
(4) A judge with supervisory authority over other judges should take reasonable measures to ensure that they perform their duties timely and
effectively.
(5) A judge should take appropriate action upon learning of reliable evidence indicating the likelihood that a judge’s conduct contravened this
Code or a lawyer violated applicable rules of professional conduct.
Disqualification. (1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned,
including but not limited to instances in which:
(a) the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the
proceeding;
(b) the judge served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom the judge previously practiced law served during such
association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or lawyer has been a material witness;
(c) the judge knows that the judge, individually or as a fiduciary, or the judge’s spouse or minor child residing in the judge’s household, has a
financial interest in the subject matter in
controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be affected substantially by the outcome of the proceeding;
(d) the judge or the judge’s spouse, or a person related to either within the third degree of relationship, or the spouse of such a person is:
(i) a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party;
(ii) acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;
(iii) known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding; or
(iv) to the judge’s knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding;
(e) the judge has served in governmental employment and in that capacity participated as a judge (in a previous judicial position), counsel,
advisor, or material witness concerning the proceeding or has expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in
controversy.
(2) A judge should keep informed about the judge’s personal and fiduciary financial interests and make a reasonable effort to keep informed
about the personal financial interests of the judge’s spouse and minor children residing in the judge’s household.
(3) or the purposes of this section:
(a) the degree of relationship is calculated according to the civil law system; the following relatives are within the third degree of relationship:
parent, child, grandparent, grandchild, great grandparent, great grandchild, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, niece, and nephew; the listed relatives
include whole and half blood relatives and most step relatives;
(b) “fiduciary” includes such relationships as executor, administrator, trustee, and guardian;
(c) “financial interest” means ownership of a legal or equitable interest, however small, or a relationship as director, advisor, or other active
participant in the affairs of a party, except that:
ownership in a mutual or common investment fund that holds securities is not a “financial interest” in such securities unless the judge
participates in the management of the fund;
(ii) an office in an educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organization is not a “financial interest” in securities held by the
organization;
(iii) the proprietary interest of a policyholder in a mutual insurance company, or a depositor in a mutual savings association, or a similar
proprietary interest, is a “financial interest” in the organization only if the outcome of the proceeding could substantially affect the value of the
interest;
(iv) ownership of government securities is a “financial interest” in the issuer only if the outcome of the proceeding could substantially affect the
value of the securities;
(d) “proceeding” includes pretrial, trial, appellate review, or other stages of litigation.
(4) Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Canon, if a judge would be disqualified because of a financial interest in a party (other
than an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome), disqualification is not required if the judge (or the judge’s spouse or
minor child) divests the interest that provides the grounds for disqualification.
.D
Remittal of Disqualification. Instead of withdrawing from the proceeding, a judge disqualified by Canon 3C(1) may, except in the
circumstances specifically set out in subsections (a) through (e), disclose on the record the basis of disqualification. The judge may participate
in the proceeding if, after that disclosure, the parties and their lawyers have an opportunity to confer outside the presence of the judge, all

agree in writing or on the record that the judge should not be disqualified, and the judge is then willing to participate. The agreement should
be incorporated in the record of the proceeding.
COMMENTARY
Canon 3A(3). The duty to hear all proceedings fairly and with patience is not inconsistent with the duty to dispose promptly of the business of
the court. Courts can be efficient and businesslike while being patient and deliberate.

The duty under Canon 2 to act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary applies to all the
judge’s activities, including the discharge of the judge’s adjudicative and administrative responsibilities. The duty to be respectful includes the
responsibility to avoid comment or behavior that could reasonably be interpreted as harassment, prejudice or bias.
Canon 3A(4). The restriction on ex parte communications concerning a proceeding includes communications from lawyers, law teachers, and
others who are not participants in the proceeding. A judge may consult with other judges or with court personnel whose function is to aid the
judge in carrying out adjudicative responsibilities. A judge should make reasonable efforts to ensure that law clerks and other court personnel
comply with this provision.
A judge may encourage and seek to facilitate settlement but should not act in a manner that coerces any party into surrendering the right to
have the controversy resolved by the courts.
Canon 3A(5). In disposing of matters promptly, efficiently, and fairly, a judge must demonstrate due regard for the rights of the parties to be
heard and to have issues resolved without unnecessary cost or delay. A judge should monitor and supervise cases to reduce or eliminate
dilatory practices, avoidable delays, and unnecessary costs.
Prompt disposition of the court’s business requires a judge to devote adequate time to judicial duties, to be punctual in attending court and
expeditious in determining matters under submission, and to take reasonable measures to ensure that court personnel, litigants, and their
lawyers cooperate with the judge to that end.
Canon 3A(6). The admonition against public comment about the merits of a pending or impending matter continues until the appellate
process is complete. If the public comment involves a case from the judge’s own court, the judge should take particular care so that the
comment does not denigrate public confidence in the judiciary’s integrity and impartiality, which would violate Canon 2A. A judge may
comment publicly on proceedings in which the judge is a litigant in a personal capacity, but not on mandamus proceedings when the judge is
a litigant in an official capacity (but the judge may respond in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 21(b)).
Canon 3B(3). A judge’s appointees include assigned counsel, officials such as referees, commissioners, special masters, receivers,
guardians, and personnel such as law clerks, secretaries, and judicial assistants. Consent by the parties to an appointment or an award of
compensation does not relieve the judge of the obligation prescribed by this subsection.
Canon 3B(5). Appropriate action may include direct communication with the judge or lawyer, other direct action if available, reporting the
conduct to the appropriate authorities, or, when the judge believes that a judge’s or lawyer’s conduct is caused by drugs, alcohol, or a medical
condition, making a confidential referral to an assistance program. Appropriate action may also include responding to a subpoena to testify or
otherwise participating in judicial or lawyer disciplinary proceedings; a judge should be candid and honest with disciplinary authorities.
Canon 3C. Recusal considerations applicable to a judge’s spouse should also be considered with respect to a person other than a spouse
with whom the judge maintains both a household and an intimate relationship.
Canon 3C(1)(c). In a criminal proceeding, a victim entitled to restitution is not, within the meaning of this Canon, a party to the proceeding or
the subject matter in controversy. A judge who has a financial interest in the victim of a crime is not required by Canon 3C(1)(c) to disqualify
from the criminal proceeding, but the judge must do so if the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned under Canon 3C(1) or if the
judge has an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding under Canon 3C(1)(d)(iii).
Canon 3C(1)(d)(ii). The fact that a lawyer in a proceeding is affiliated with a law firm with which a relative of the judge is affiliated does not of
itself disqualify the judge. However, if “the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned” under Canon 3C(1), or the relative is known by
the judge to have an interest in the law firm that could be “substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding” under Canon 3C(1)(d)(iii),
the judge’s disqualification is required.

CANON 4: A JUDGE MAY ENGAGE IN EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITIES THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE OBLIGATIONS OF JUDICIAL
OFFICE
A judge may engage in extrajudicial activities, including law-related pursuits and civic, charitable, educational, religious, social, financial,
fiduciary, and governmental activities, and may speak, write, lecture, and teach on both law-related and nonlegal subjects. However, a judge
should not participate in extrajudicial activities that detract from the dignity of the judge’s office, interfere with the performance of the judge’s
official duties, reflect adversely on the judge’s impartiality, lead to frequent disqualification, or violate the limitations set forth below.
.A Law-related Activities.
(1) Speaking, Writing, and Teaching. A judge may speak, write, lecture, teach, and participate in other activities concerning the law, the legal
system, and the administration of justice.
(2) Consultation. A judge may consult with or appear at a public hearing before an executive or legislative body or official:
on matters concerning the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice;
(b) to the extent that it would generally be perceived that a judge’s judicial experience provides special expertise in the area; or
(c) when the judge is acting pro se in a matter involving the judge or the judge’s interest.
(3) Organizations. A judge may participate in and serve as a member, officer, director, trustee, or nonlegal advisor of a nonprofit organization
devoted to the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice and may assist such an organization in the management and investment
of funds. A judge may make recommendations to public and private fund-granting agencies about projects and programs concerning the law,
the legal system, and the administration of justice.
(4) Arbitration and Mediation. A judge should not act as an arbitrator or mediator or otherwise perform judicial functions apart from the judge’s
official duties unless expressly authorized by law.
(5) Practice of Law. A judge should not practice law and should not serve as a family member’s lawyer in any forum. A judge may, however,
act pro se and may, without compensation, give legal advice to and draft or review documents for a member of the judge’s family.
.B Civic and Charitable Activities. A judge may participate in and serve as an officer, director, trustee, or nonlegal advisor of a nonprofit civic,
charitable, educational, religious, or social organization, subject to the following limitations:
(1) A judge should not serve if it is likely that the organization will either be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come before the
judge or be regularly engaged in adversary proceedings in any court.
(2) A judge should not give investment advice to such an organization but may serve on its board of directors or trustees even though it has
the responsibility for approving investment decisions.
.C Fund Raising. A judge may assist nonprofit law-related, civic, charitable, educational, religious, or social organizations in planning fundraising activities and may be listed as an officer, director, or trustee. A judge may solicit funds for such an organization from judges over whom
the judge does not exercise supervisory or appellate authority and from members of the judge’s family. Otherwise, a judge should not
personally participate in fund-raising activities, solicit funds for any organization, or use or permit the use of the prestige of judicial office for
that purpose. A judge should not personally participate in membership solicitation if the solicitation might reasonably be perceived as coercive
or is essentially a fund-raising mechanism.
Financial Activities.
(1) A judge may hold and manage investments, including real estate, and engage in other remunerative activity, but should refrain from
financial and business dealings that exploit the judicial position or involve the judge in frequent transactions or continuing business
relationships with lawyers or other persons likely to come before the court on which the judge serves.
(2) A judge may serve as an officer, director, active partner, manager, advisor, or employee of a business only if the business is closely held
and controlled by members of the judge’s family. For this purpose, “members of the judge’s family” means persons related to the judge or the
judge’s spouse within the third degree of relationship as defined in Canon 3C(3)(a), any other relative with whom the judge or the judge’s
spouse maintains a close familial relationship, and the spouse of any of the foregoing.
(3) As soon as the judge can do so without serious financial detriment, the judge should divest investments and other financial interests that
might require frequent disqualification.
(4) A judge should comply with the restrictions on acceptance of gifts and the prohibition on solicitation of gifts set forth in the Judicial
Conference Gift Regulations. A judge should endeavor to prevent any member of the judge’s family residing in the household from soliciting or
accepting a gift except to the extent that a judge would be permitted to do so by the Judicial Conference Gift Regulations. A “member of the
judge’s family” means any relative of a judge by blood, adoption, or marriage, or any person treated by a judge as a member of the judge’s
family.
(5) A judge should not disclose or use nonpublic information acquired in a judicial capacity for any purpose unrelated to the judge’s official
duties.
.E Fiduciary Activities. A judge may serve as the executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary only for the estate, trust, or
person of a member of the judge’s family as defined in Canon 4D(4). As a family fiduciary a judge is subject to the following restrictions:
(1) The judge should not serve if it is likely that as a fiduciary the judge would be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come before
the judge or if the estate, trust, or ward becomes involved in adversary proceedings in the court on which the judge serves or one under its
appellate jurisdiction.
(2) While acting as a fiduciary, a judge is subject to the same restrictions on financial activities that apply to the judge in a personal capacity.

F. Governmental Appointments. A judge may accept appointment to a governmental committee, commission, or other position only if it is one
that concerns the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice, or if appointment of a judge is required by federal statute. A judge
should not, in any event, accept such an appointment if the judge’s governmental duties would tend to undermine the public confidence in the
integrity, impartiality, or independence of the judiciary. A judge may represent the judge’s country, state, or locality on ceremonial occasions or
in connection with historical, educational, and cultural activities.
G. Chambers, Resources, and Staff. A judge should not to any substantial degree use judicial chambers, resources, or staff to engage in
extrajudicial activities permitted by this Canon.
H. Compensation, Reimbursement, and Financial Reporting. A judge may accept compensation and reimbursement of expenses for the lawrelated and extrajudicial activities permitted by this Code if the source of the payments does not give the appearance of influencing the judge
in the judge’s judicial duties or otherwise give the appearance of impropriety, subject to the following restrictions:
(1) Compensation should not exceed a reasonable amount nor should it exceed what a person who is not a judge would receive for the same
activity.
(2) Expense reimbursement should be limited to the actual costs of travel, food, and lodging reasonably incurred by the judge and, where
appropriate to the occasion, by the judge’s spouse or relative. Any additional payment is compensation.
(3) A judge should make required financial disclosures, including disclosures of gifts and other things of value, in compliance with applicable
statutes and Judicial Conference regulations and directives.
COMMENTARY
Canon 4. Complete separation of a judge from extrajudicial activities is neither possible nor wise; a judge should not become isolated from the
society in which the judge lives. As a judicial officer and a person specially learned in the law, a judge is in a unique position to contribute to
the law, the legal system, and the administration of justice, including revising substantive and procedural law and improving criminal and
juvenile justice. To the extent that the judge’s time permits and impartiality is not compromised, the judge is encouraged to do so, either
independently or through a bar association, judicial conference, or other organization dedicated to the law. Subject to the same limitations,
judges may also engage in a wide range of non-law-related activities.
Within the boundaries of applicable law (see, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 953) a judge may express opposition to the persecution of lawyers and judges
anywhere in the world if the judge has ascertained, after reasonable inquiry, that the persecution is occasioned by conflict between the
professional responsibilities of the persecuted judge or lawyer and the policies or practices of the relevant government.
A person other than a spouse with whom the judge maintains both a household and an intimate relationship should be considered a member
of the judge’s family for purposes of legal assistance under Canon 4A(5), fund raising under Canon 4C, and family business activities under
Canon 4D(2).
Canon 4A. Teaching and serving on the board of a law school are permissible, but in the case of a for-profit law school, board service is
limited to a nongoverning advisory board.
Consistent with this Canon, a judge may encourage lawyers to provide pro bono legal services.
Canon 4A(4). This Canon generally prohibits a judge from mediating a state court matter, except in unusual circumstances (e.g., when a
judge is mediating a federal matter that cannot be resolved effectively without addressing the related state court matter).
Canon 4A(5). A judge may act pro se in all legal matters, including matters involving litigation and matters involving appearances before or
other dealings with governmental bodies. In so doing, a judge must not abuse the prestige of office to advance the interests of the judge or
the judge’s family.
Canon 4B. The changing nature of some organizations and their exposure to litigation make it necessary for a judge regularly to reexamine
the activities of each organization with which the judge is affiliated to determine if the judge’s continued association is appropriate. For
example, in many jurisdictions, charitable hospitals are in court more often now than in the past.
Canon 4C. A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of
honor, or featured on the program of such an event. Use of a judge’s name, position in the organization, and judicial designation on an
organization’s letterhead, including when used for fund raising or soliciting members, does not violate Canon 4C if comparable information
and designations are listed for others.
Canon 4D(1), (2), and (3). Canon 3 requires disqualification of a judge in any proceeding in which the judge has a financial interest, however
small. Canon 4D requires a judge to refrain from engaging in business and from financial activities that might interfere with the impartial
performance of the judge’s judicial duties. Canon 4H requires a judge to report compensation received for activities outside the judicial office.

A judge has the rights of an ordinary citizen with respect to financial affairs, except for limitations required to safeguard the proper
performance of the judge’s duties. A judge’s participation in a closely held family business, while generally permissible, may be prohibited if it
takes too much time or involves misuse of judicial prestige or if the business is likely to come before the court on which the judge serves.
Owning and receiving income from investments do not as such affect the performance of a judge’s duties.
Canon 4D(5). The restriction on using nonpublic information is not intended to affect a judge’s ability to act on information as necessary to
protect the health or safety of the judge or a member of a judge’s family, court personnel, or other judicial officers if consistent with other
provisions of this Code.
Canon 4E. Mere residence in the judge’s household does not by itself make a person a member of the judge’s family for purposes of this
Canon. The person must be treated by the judge as a member of the judge’s family.
The Applicable Date of Compliance provision of this Code addresses continued service as a fiduciary.
A judge’s obligation under this Code and the judge’s obligation as a fiduciary may come into conflict. For example, a judge should resign as a
trustee if it would result in detriment to the trust to divest holdings whose retention would require frequent disqualification of the judge in
violation of Canon 4D(3).
Canon 4F. The appropriateness of accepting extrajudicial assignments must be assessed in light of the demands on judicial resources and
the need to protect the courts from involvement in matters that may prove to be controversial. Judges should not accept governmental
appointments that could interfere with the effectiveness and independence of the judiciary, interfere with the performance of the judge’s
judicial responsibilities, or tend to undermine public confidence in the judiciary.
Canon 4H. A judge is not required by this Code to disclose income, debts, or investments, except as provided in this Canon. The Ethics
Reform Act of 1989 and implementing regulations promulgated by the Judicial Conference impose additional restrictions on judges’ receipt of
compensation. That Act and those regulations should be consulted before a judge enters into any arrangement involving the receipt of
compensation. The restrictions so imposed include but are not limited to: (1) a prohibition against receiving “honoraria” (defined as anything of
value received for a speech, appearance, or article), (2) a prohibition against receiving compensation for service as a director, trustee, or
officer of a profit or nonprofit organization, (3) a requirement that compensated teaching activities receive prior approval, and (4) a limitation
on the receipt of “outside earned income.”
CANON 5: A JUDGE SHOULD REFRAIN FROM POLITICAL ACTIVITY
A. General Prohibitions. A judge should not:
(1) act as a leader or hold any office in a political organization;
(2) make speeches for a political organization or candidate, or publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for public office; or
(3) solicit funds for, pay an assessment to, or make a contribution to a political organization or candidate, or attend or purchase a ticket for a
dinner or other event sponsored by a political organization or candidate.
B. Resignation upon Candidacy. A judge should resign the judicial office if the judge becomes a candidate in a primary or general election for
any office.
C. Other Political Activity. A judge should not engage in any other political activity. This provision does not prevent a judge from engaging in
activities described in Canon 4.
COMMENTARY
The term “political organization” refers to a political party, a group affiliated with a political party or candidate for public office, or an entity
whose principal purpose is to advocate for or against political candidates or parties in connection with elections for public office.
Compliance with the Code of Conduct

Anyone who is an officer of the federal judicial system authorized to perform judicial functions is a judge for the purpose of this Code. All
judges should comply with this Code except as provided below.
Part-time Judge
A part-time judge is a judge who serves part-time, whether continuously or periodically, but is permitted by law to devote time to some other
profession or occupation and whose compensation for that reason is less than that of a full-time judge. A part-time judge:
(1) is not required to comply with Canons 4A(4), 4A(5), 4D(2), 4E, 4F, or 4H(3);
(2) except as provided in the Conflict-of-Interest Rules for Part-time Magistrate Judges, should not practice law in the court on which the judge
serves or in any court subject to that court’s appellate jurisdiction, or act as a lawyer in a proceeding in which the judge has served as a judge
or in any related proceeding.
B. Judge Pro Tempore
A judge pro tempore is a person who is appointed to act temporarily as a judge or as a special master.
(1) While acting in this capacity, a judge pro tempore is not required to comply with Canons 4A(4), 4A(5), 4D(2), 4D(3), 4E, 4F, or 4H(3);
further, one who acts solely as a special master is not required to comply with Canons 4A(3), 4B, 4C, 4D(4), or 5.
(2) A person who has been a judge pro tempore should not act as a lawyer in a proceeding in which the judge has served as a judge or in any
related proceeding.
C. Retired Judge
A judge who is retired under 28 U.S.C. § 371(b) or § 372(a), or who is subject to recall under § 178(d), or who is recalled to judicial service,
should comply with all the provisions of this Code except Canon 4F, but the judge should refrain from judicial service during the period of an
extrajudicial appointment not sanctioned by Canon 4F. All other retired judges who are eligible for recall to judicial service (except those in
U.S. territories and possessions) should comply with the provisions of this Code governing part-time judges. A senior judge in the territories
and possessions must comply with this Code as prescribed by 28 U.S.C. §§ 373(c)(5) and (d).
Applicable Date of Compliance
Persons to whom this Code applies should arrange their financial and fiduciary affairs as soon as reasonably possible to comply with it and
should do so in any event within one year after appointment. If, however, the demands on the person’s time and the possibility of conflicts of
interest are not substantial, such a person may continue to act, without compensation, as an executor, administrator, trustee, or other fiduciary
for the estate or person of one who is not a member of the person’s family if terminating the relationship would unnecessarily jeopardize any
substantial interest of the estate or person and if the judicial council of the circuit approves.
TO SEE AUTHORITATIVE TEXT PLEASE LOG ON:- http://www.uscourts.gov/Viewer.aspx?doc=/uscourts/RulesAndPolicies/conduct/Vol02ACh02.pdf
Therefore, I understand that similar provisions be made for the Judges of the Hon’ble Courts, and the Rules be strictly adhered by the Judges
of the Hon’ble Court.

4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
government of india and constitutional bench of supreme court of india to enact / codify laws governing both official actions , private
actions of judges from munsiff level to supreme court of india.. it must also cover quasi judicial officers like revenue inspectors , excise
inspectors , district collectors who perform quasi judicial functions. The law must have provision for legal prosecution of violators , guilty
judges & their removal from office.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:

a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the Government of India , constitution bench of supreme court of india , to enact laws / codify rules governing judges & quasi judicial
officers with regards to their actions both official & private.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.
Dated : 05th october 2016 …………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India…………………….

PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

34. PIL - CODE OF CONDUCT FOR JUDGES & POLICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.

OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF
NAGARAJA . M.R
editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for Justice
# LIG 2 , No 761 ,, HUDCO First Stage , Laxmikantanagar ,
Hebbal , Mysore – 570017 , Karnataka State
....Petitioner

Versus

1.

Chief Justice of India

2.

Union Home Secretary , GOI

3.

Union Law & Justice Secretary , GOI

4.

Chief Secretaries of all states & UTs

....Respondents

PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 12 to ARTICLE 35 & ARTICLE 51A OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA FOR ISSUANCE OF A WRIT IN THE
NATURE OF MANDAMUS UNDER ARTICLE 32 & ARTICLE 226 and other relevant acts OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA.

To ,
Hon'ble The Chief Justice of India and His Lordship's Companion Justices of the Supreme Court of India.

The Humble petition of the Petitioner above named.

MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH :

1.

Facts of the case:

The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others , public to emulate & follow. if a student makes a
mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same mistake.
if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot-free under his

patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the aggrieved. just
think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the land himself commits crime - violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights & human rights
of public and obstructs the public from performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ?
it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power , criminals in public service to commit more crimes. that is exactly what is
happening in india. the educated public must raise to the occasion & peacefully , democratically must oppose this criminalization of judiciary ,
public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.
Day after day we are seeing allegations against judges and police in crimes against women , sex crimes , judicial orders for money , etc
in the media. There is total secrecy in the functioning of judiciary in india with regards to disciplinary proceedings , promotions and selection
of judges. We the public don’t know whether proper investigation / enquiry is done in such cases of allegations against judges & police ,
what action taken against the guilty judges & police ?
Read few actual cases of crimes by judges at following web pages ;
Half of former CJIs Corrupt :
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/half-of-former-cjis-corrupt ,
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges

A – Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,
JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,

RTI & Land Golmaal
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,

Why NOT 3rd degree Torture of Corrupt Doctors , Police & Judges
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.in/2015/10/why-not-3rd-degree-torture-of-doctors.html#links ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/3rd-degree-torture-by-doctors-police ,

Hereby , we demand code of conduct for judges and police with provision of criminal prosecution of violators.

Regard for the public welfare is the highest law (SALUS POPULI EST SUPREMA LEX).
No man shall be condemned unheard (AUDI ALTERAM PARTEM).
No man can be judge in his own cause (NEMO DEBET ESSE JUDEX IN PROPRIA SUA CAUSA).
An act of the Court shall prejudice no man (ACTUS CURIAE NEMINEM GRAVABIT).

2. Question(s) of Law:
Are JUDGES & POLICE above law ?
3. Grounds:
Requests for equitable justice and legal prosecution of guilty judges, police to uphold rule of law in india.
I wish to state you humbly that the United States Courts have framed the following rules for judges:CANON 1: A JUDGE SHOULD UPHOLD THE INTEGRITY AND INDEPENDENCE OF THE JUDICIARY
An independent and honorable judiciary is indispensable to justice in our society. A judge should maintain and enforce high standards of
conduct and should personally observe those standards, so that the integrity and independence of the judiciary may be preserved. The
provisions of this Code should be construed and applied to further that objective.
COMMENTARY
Deference to the judgments and rulings of courts depends on public confidence in the integrity and independence of judges. The integrity and
independence of judges depend in turn on their acting without fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they must comply with
the law and should comply with this Code.
Adherence to this responsibility helps to maintain public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary. Conversely, violation of this Code
diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and injures our system of government under law.
CANON 2: A JUDGE SHOULD AVOID IMPROPRIETY AND THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN ALL ACTIVITIES
A. Respect for Law. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence
in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.
B. Outside Influence. A judge should not allow family, social, political, financial, or other relationships to influence judicial conduct or judgment.
A judge should neither lend the prestige of the judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge or others nor convey or permit others
to convey the impression that they are in a special position to influence the judge. A judge should not testify voluntarily as a character witness.
C. Nondiscriminatory Membership. A judge should not hold membership in any organization that practices invidious discrimination on the
basis of race, sex, religion, or national origin.
COMMENTARY
Canon 2A. An appearance of impropriety occurs when reasonable minds, with knowledge of all the relevant circumstances disclosed by a
reasonable inquiry, would conclude that the judge’s honesty, integrity, impartiality, temperament, or fitness toserve as a judge is impaired.
Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judges. A judge must avoid all impropriety and
appearance of impropriety. This prohibition applies to both professional and personal conduct. A judge must expect to be the subject of
constant public scrutiny and accept freely and willingly restrictions that might be viewed as burdensome by the ordinary citizen. Because it is
not practicable to list all prohibited acts, the prohibition is necessarily cast in general terms that extend to conduct by judges that is harmful
although not specifically mentioned in the Code. Actual improprieties under this standard include violations of law, court rules, or other specific
provisions of this Code.
Canon 2B. Testimony as a character witness injects the prestige of the judicial office into the proceeding in which the judge testifies and may
be perceived as an official testimonial. A judge should discourage a party from requiring the judge to testify as a character witness except in
unusual circumstances when the demands of justice require. This Canon does not create a privilege against testifying in response to an
official summons.
A judge should avoid lending the prestige of judicial office to advance the private interests of the judge or others. For example, a judge should
not use the judge’s judicial position or title to gain advantage in litigation involving a friend or a member of the judge’s family. In contracts for
publication of a judge’s writings, a judge should retain control over the advertising to avoid exploitation of the judge’s office.
A judge should be sensitive to possible abuse of the prestige of office. A judge should not initiate communications to a sentencing judge or a
probation or corrections officer but may provide information to such persons in response to a formal request. Judges may participate in the
process of judicial selection by cooperating with appointing authorities and screening committees seeking names for consideration and by
responding to official inquiries concerning a person being considered for a judgeship.
Canon 2C. Membership of a judge in an organization that practices invidious discrimination gives rise to perceptions that the judge’s
impartiality is impaired. Canon 2C refers to the current practices of the organization. Whether an organization practices invidious
discrimination is often a complex question to which judges should be sensitive. The answer cannot be determined from a mere examination of
an organization’s current membership rolls but rather depends on how the organization selects members and other relevant factors, such as
that the organization is dedicated to the preservation of religious, ethnic or cultural values of legitimate common interest to its members, or
that it is in fact and effect an intimate, purely private organization whose membership limitations could not be constitutionally prohibited.
CANON 3: A JUDGE SHOULD PERFORM THE DUTIES OF THE OFFICE FAIRLY, IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY
The duties of judicial office take precedence over all other activities. In performing the duties prescribed by law, the judge should adhere to
the following standards:
.A Adjudicative Responsibilities.

(1) A judge should be faithful to, and maintain professional competence in, the law and should not be swayed by partisan interests, public
clamor, or fear of criticism.
(2) A judge should hear and decide matters assigned, unless disqualified, and should maintain order and decorum in all judicial proceedings.
(3)A judge should be patient, dignified, respectful, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom the judge deals
in an official capacity. A judge should require similar conduct of those subject to the judge’s control, including lawyers to the extent consistent
with their role in the adversary process.
(4) A judge should accord to every person who has a legal interest in a proceeding, and that person’s lawyer, the full right to be heard
according to law. Except as set out below, a judge should not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications or consider other
communications concerning a pending or impending matter that are made outside the presence of the parties or their lawyers. If a judge
receives an unauthorized ex parte communication bearing on the substance of a matter, the judge should promptly notify the parties of the
subject matter of the communication and allow the parties an opportunity to respond, if requested. A judge may:
(a) initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications as authorized by law;
(b) when circumstances require it, permit ex parte communication for scheduling, administrative, or emergency purposes, but only if the ex
parte communication does not address substantive matters and the judge reasonably believes that no party will gain a procedural,
substantive, or tactical advantage as a result of the ex parte communication;
(c) obtain the written advice of a disinterested expert on the law, but only after giving advance notice to the parties of the person to be
consulted and the subject matter of the advice and affording the parties reasonable opportunity to object and respond to the notice and to the
advice received; or
(d) with the consent of the parties, confer separately with the parties and their counsel in an effort to mediate or settle pending matters.
(5) A judge should dispose promptly of the business of the court.
(6) A judge should not make public comment on the merits of a matter pending or impending in any court. A judge should require similar
restraint by court personnel subject to the judge’s direction and control. The prohibition on public comment on the merits does not extend to
public statements made in the course of the judge’s official duties, to explanations of court procedures, or to scholarly presentations made for
purposes of legal education.
Administrative Responsibilities. (1) A judge should diligently discharge administrative responsibilities, maintain professional competence in
judicial administration, and facilitate the performance of the administrative responsibilities of other judges and court personnel.
(2) A judge should not direct court personnel to engage in conduct on the judge’s behalf or as the judge’s representative when that conduct
would contravene the Code if undertaken by the judge. (3) A judge should exercise the power of appointment fairly and only on the basis of
merit, avoiding unnecessary appointments, nepotism, and favoritism. A judge should not approve compensation of appointees beyond the fair
value of services rendered.
(4) A judge with supervisory authority over other judges should take reasonable measures to ensure that they perform their duties timely and
effectively.
(5) A judge should take appropriate action upon learning of reliable evidence indicating the likelihood that a judge’s conduct contravened this
Code or a lawyer violated applicable rules of professional conduct.
Disqualification. (1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned,
including but not limited to instances in which:
(a) the judge has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning the
proceeding;
(b) the judge served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom the judge previously practiced law served during such
association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or lawyer has been a material witness;
(c) the judge knows that the judge, individually or as a fiduciary, or the judge’s spouse or minor child residing in the judge’s household, has a
financial interest in the subject matter in
controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be affected substantially by the outcome of the proceeding;
(d) the judge or the judge’s spouse, or a person related to either within the third degree of relationship, or the spouse of such a person is:
(i) a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party;
(ii) acting as a lawyer in the proceeding;
(iii) known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding; or
(iv) to the judge’s knowledge likely to be a material witness in the proceeding;
(e) the judge has served in governmental employment and in that capacity participated as a judge (in a previous judicial position), counsel,
advisor, or material witness concerning the proceeding or has expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in
controversy.
(2) A judge should keep informed about the judge’s personal and fiduciary financial interests and make a reasonable effort to keep informed
about the personal financial interests of the judge’s spouse and minor children residing in the judge’s household.
(3) or the purposes of this section:
(a) the degree of relationship is calculated according to the civil law system; the following relatives are within the third degree of relationship:
parent, child, grandparent, grandchild, great grandparent, great grandchild, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, niece, and nephew; the listed relatives
include whole and half blood relatives and most step relatives;

(b) “fiduciary” includes such relationships as executor, administrator, trustee, and guardian;
(c) “financial interest” means ownership of a legal or equitable interest, however small, or a relationship as director, advisor, or other active
participant in the affairs of a party, except that:
ownership in a mutual or common investment fund that holds securities is not a “financial interest” in such securities unless the judge
participates in the management of the fund;
(ii) an office in an educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organization is not a “financial interest” in securities held by the
organization;
(iii) the proprietary interest of a policyholder in a mutual insurance company, or a depositor in a mutual savings association, or a similar
proprietary interest, is a “financial interest” in the organization only if the outcome of the proceeding could substantially affect the value of the
interest;
(iv) ownership of government securities is a “financial interest” in the issuer only if the outcome of the proceeding could substantially affect the
value of the securities;
(d) “proceeding” includes pretrial, trial, appellate review, or other stages of litigation.
(4) Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this Canon, if a judge would be disqualified because of a financial interest in a party (other
than an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome), disqualification is not required if the judge (or the judge’s spouse or
minor child) divests the interest that provides the grounds for disqualification.
.D
Remittal of Disqualification. Instead of withdrawing from the proceeding, a judge disqualified by Canon 3C(1) may, except in the
circumstances specifically set out in subsections (a) through (e), disclose on the record the basis of disqualification. The judge may participate
in the proceeding if, after that disclosure, the parties and their lawyers have an opportunity to confer outside the presence of the judge, all
agree in writing or on the record that the judge should not be disqualified, and the judge is then willing to participate. The agreement should
be incorporated in the record of the proceeding.
COMMENTARY
Canon 3A(3). The duty to hear all proceedings fairly and with patience is not inconsistent with the duty to dispose promptly of the business of
the court. Courts can be efficient and businesslike while being patient and deliberate.

The duty under Canon 2 to act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary applies to all the
judge’s activities, including the discharge of the judge’s adjudicative and administrative responsibilities. The duty to be respectful includes the
responsibility to avoid comment or behavior that could reasonably be interpreted as harassment, prejudice or bias.
Canon 3A(4). The restriction on ex parte communications concerning a proceeding includes communications from lawyers, law teachers, and
others who are not participants in the proceeding. A judge may consult with other judges or with court personnel whose function is to aid the
judge in carrying out adjudicative responsibilities. A judge should make reasonable efforts to ensure that law clerks and other court personnel
comply with this provision.
A judge may encourage and seek to facilitate settlement but should not act in a manner that coerces any party into surrendering the right to
have the controversy resolved by the courts.
Canon 3A(5). In disposing of matters promptly, efficiently, and fairly, a judge must demonstrate due regard for the rights of the parties to be
heard and to have issues resolved without unnecessary cost or delay. A judge should monitor and supervise cases to reduce or eliminate
dilatory practices, avoidable delays, and unnecessary costs.
Prompt disposition of the court’s business requires a judge to devote adequate time to judicial duties, to be punctual in attending court and
expeditious in determining matters under submission, and to take reasonable measures to ensure that court personnel, litigants, and their
lawyers cooperate with the judge to that end.
Canon 3A(6). The admonition against public comment about the merits of a pending or impending matter continues until the appellate
process is complete. If the public comment involves a case from the judge’s own court, the judge should take particular care so that the
comment does not denigrate public confidence in the judiciary’s integrity and impartiality, which would violate Canon 2A. A judge may
comment publicly on proceedings in which the judge is a litigant in a personal capacity, but not on mandamus proceedings when the judge is
a litigant in an official capacity (but the judge may respond in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 21(b)).

Canon 3B(3). A judge’s appointees include assigned counsel, officials such as referees, commissioners, special masters, receivers,
guardians, and personnel such as law clerks, secretaries, and judicial assistants. Consent by the parties to an appointment or an award of
compensation does not relieve the judge of the obligation prescribed by this subsection.
Canon 3B(5). Appropriate action may include direct communication with the judge or lawyer, other direct action if available, reporting the
conduct to the appropriate authorities, or, when the judge believes that a judge’s or lawyer’s conduct is caused by drugs, alcohol, or a medical
condition, making a confidential referral to an assistance program. Appropriate action may also include responding to a subpoena to testify or
otherwise participating in judicial or lawyer disciplinary proceedings; a judge should be candid and honest with disciplinary authorities.
Canon 3C. Recusal considerations applicable to a judge’s spouse should also be considered with respect to a person other than a spouse
with whom the judge maintains both a household and an intimate relationship.
Canon 3C(1)(c). In a criminal proceeding, a victim entitled to restitution is not, within the meaning of this Canon, a party to the proceeding or
the subject matter in controversy. A judge who has a financial interest in the victim of a crime is not required by Canon 3C(1)(c) to disqualify
from the criminal proceeding, but the judge must do so if the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned under Canon 3C(1) or if the
judge has an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding under Canon 3C(1)(d)(iii).
Canon 3C(1)(d)(ii). The fact that a lawyer in a proceeding is affiliated with a law firm with which a relative of the judge is affiliated does not of
itself disqualify the judge. However, if “the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned” under Canon 3C(1), or the relative is known by
the judge to have an interest in the law firm that could be “substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding” under Canon 3C(1)(d)(iii),
the judge’s disqualification is required.
CANON 4: A JUDGE MAY ENGAGE IN EXTRAJUDICIAL ACTIVITIES THAT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE OBLIGATIONS OF JUDICIAL
OFFICE
A judge may engage in extrajudicial activities, including law-related pursuits and civic, charitable, educational, religious, social, financial,
fiduciary, and governmental activities, and may speak, write, lecture, and teach on both law-related and nonlegal subjects. However, a judge
should not participate in extrajudicial activities that detract from the dignity of the judge’s office, interfere with the performance of the judge’s
official duties, reflect adversely on the judge’s impartiality, lead to frequent disqualification, or violate the limitations set forth below.
.A Law-related Activities.
(1) Speaking, Writing, and Teaching. A judge may speak, write, lecture, teach, and participate in other activities concerning the law, the legal
system, and the administration of justice.
(2) Consultation. A judge may consult with or appear at a public hearing before an executive or legislative body or official:
on matters concerning the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice;
(b) to the extent that it would generally be perceived that a judge’s judicial experience provides special expertise in the area; or
(c) when the judge is acting pro se in a matter involving the judge or the judge’s interest.
(3) Organizations. A judge may participate in and serve as a member, officer, director, trustee, or nonlegal advisor of a nonprofit organization
devoted to the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice and may assist such an organization in the management and investment
of funds. A judge may make recommendations to public and private fund-granting agencies about projects and programs concerning the law,
the legal system, and the administration of justice.
(4) Arbitration and Mediation. A judge should not act as an arbitrator or mediator or otherwise perform judicial functions apart from the judge’s
official duties unless expressly authorized by law.
(5) Practice of Law. A judge should not practice law and should not serve as a family member’s lawyer in any forum. A judge may, however,
act pro se and may, without compensation, give legal advice to and draft or review documents for a member of the judge’s family.
.B Civic and Charitable Activities. A judge may participate in and serve as an officer, director, trustee, or nonlegal advisor of a nonprofit civic,
charitable, educational, religious, or social organization, subject to the following limitations:
(1) A judge should not serve if it is likely that the organization will either be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come before the
judge or be regularly engaged in adversary proceedings in any court.
(2) A judge should not give investment advice to such an organization but may serve on its board of directors or trustees even though it has
the responsibility for approving investment decisions.
.C Fund Raising. A judge may assist nonprofit law-related, civic, charitable, educational, religious, or social organizations in planning fundraising activities and may be listed as an officer, director, or trustee. A judge may solicit funds for such an organization from judges over whom
the judge does not exercise supervisory or appellate authority and from members of the judge’s family. Otherwise, a judge should not
personally participate in fund-raising activities, solicit funds for any organization, or use or permit the use of the prestige of judicial office for
that purpose. A judge should not personally participate in membership solicitation if the solicitation might reasonably be perceived as coercive
or is essentially a fund-raising mechanism.
Financial Activities.

(1) A judge may hold and manage investments, including real estate, and engage in other remunerative activity, but should refrain from
financial and business dealings that exploit the judicial position or involve the judge in frequent transactions or continuing business
relationships with lawyers or other persons likely to come before the court on which the judge serves.
(2) A judge may serve as an officer, director, active partner, manager, advisor, or employee of a business only if the business is closely held
and controlled by members of the judge’s family. For this purpose, “members of the judge’s family” means persons related to the judge or the
judge’s spouse within the third degree of relationship as defined in Canon 3C(3)(a), any other relative with whom the judge or the judge’s
spouse maintains a close familial relationship, and the spouse of any of the foregoing.
(3) As soon as the judge can do so without serious financial detriment, the judge should divest investments and other financial interests that
might require frequent disqualification.
(4) A judge should comply with the restrictions on acceptance of gifts and the prohibition on solicitation of gifts set forth in the Judicial
Conference Gift Regulations. A judge should endeavor to prevent any member of the judge’s family residing in the household from soliciting or
accepting a gift except to the extent that a judge would be permitted to do so by the Judicial Conference Gift Regulations. A “member of the
judge’s family” means any relative of a judge by blood, adoption, or marriage, or any person treated by a judge as a member of the judge’s
family.
(5) A judge should not disclose or use nonpublic information acquired in a judicial capacity for any purpose unrelated to the judge’s official
duties.
.E Fiduciary Activities. A judge may serve as the executor, administrator, trustee, guardian, or other fiduciary only for the estate, trust, or
person of a member of the judge’s family as defined in Canon 4D(4). As a family fiduciary a judge is subject to the following restrictions:
(1) The judge should not serve if it is likely that as a fiduciary the judge would be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come before
the judge or if the estate, trust, or ward becomes involved in adversary proceedings in the court on which the judge serves or one under its
appellate jurisdiction.
(2) While acting as a fiduciary, a judge is subject to the same restrictions on financial activities that apply to the judge in a personal capacity.
F. Governmental Appointments. A judge may accept appointment to a governmental committee, commission, or other position only if it is one
that concerns the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice, or if appointment of a judge is required by federal statute. A judge
should not, in any event, accept such an appointment if the judge’s governmental duties would tend to undermine the public confidence in the
integrity, impartiality, or independence of the judiciary. A judge may represent the judge’s country, state, or locality on ceremonial occasions or
in connection with historical, educational, and cultural activities.
G. Chambers, Resources, and Staff. A judge should not to any substantial degree use judicial chambers, resources, or staff to engage in
extrajudicial activities permitted by this Canon.
H. Compensation, Reimbursement, and Financial Reporting. A judge may accept compensation and reimbursement of expenses for the lawrelated and extrajudicial activities permitted by this Code if the source of the payments does not give the appearance of influencing the judge
in the judge’s judicial duties or otherwise give the appearance of impropriety, subject to the following restrictions:
(1) Compensation should not exceed a reasonable amount nor should it exceed what a person who is not a judge would receive for the same
activity.
(2) Expense reimbursement should be limited to the actual costs of travel, food, and lodging reasonably incurred by the judge and, where
appropriate to the occasion, by the judge’s spouse or relative. Any additional payment is compensation.
(3) A judge should make required financial disclosures, including disclosures of gifts and other things of value, in compliance with applicable
statutes and Judicial Conference regulations and directives.
COMMENTARY
Canon 4. Complete separation of a judge from extrajudicial activities is neither possible nor wise; a judge should not become isolated from the
society in which the judge lives. As a judicial officer and a person specially learned in the law, a judge is in a unique position to contribute to
the law, the legal system, and the administration of justice, including revising substantive and procedural law and improving criminal and
juvenile justice. To the extent that the judge’s time permits and impartiality is not compromised, the judge is encouraged to do so, either
independently or through a bar association, judicial conference, or other organization dedicated to the law. Subject to the same limitations,
judges may also engage in a wide range of non-law-related activities.
Within the boundaries of applicable law (see, e.g., 18 U.S.C. § 953) a judge may express opposition to the persecution of lawyers and judges
anywhere in the world if the judge has ascertained, after reasonable inquiry, that the persecution is occasioned by conflict between the
professional responsibilities of the persecuted judge or lawyer and the policies or practices of the relevant government.
A person other than a spouse with whom the judge maintains both a household and an intimate relationship should be considered a member
of the judge’s family for purposes of legal assistance under Canon 4A(5), fund raising under Canon 4C, and family business activities under
Canon 4D(2).
Canon 4A. Teaching and serving on the board of a law school are permissible, but in the case of a for-profit law school, board service is
limited to a nongoverning advisory board.

Consistent with this Canon, a judge may encourage lawyers to provide pro bono legal services.
Canon 4A(4). This Canon generally prohibits a judge from mediating a state court matter, except in unusual circumstances (e.g., when a
judge is mediating a federal matter that cannot be resolved effectively without addressing the related state court matter).
Canon 4A(5). A judge may act pro se in all legal matters, including matters involving litigation and matters involving appearances before or
other dealings with governmental bodies. In so doing, a judge must not abuse the prestige of office to advance the interests of the judge or
the judge’s family.
Canon 4B. The changing nature of some organizations and their exposure to litigation make it necessary for a judge regularly to reexamine
the activities of each organization with which the judge is affiliated to determine if the judge’s continued association is appropriate. For
example, in many jurisdictions, charitable hospitals are in court more often now than in the past.
Canon 4C. A judge may attend fund-raising events of law-related and other organizations although the judge may not be a speaker, a guest of
honor, or featured on the program of such an event. Use of a judge’s name, position in the organization, and judicial designation on an
organization’s letterhead, including when used for fund raising or soliciting members, does not violate Canon 4C if comparable information
and designations are listed for others.
Canon 4D(1), (2), and (3). Canon 3 requires disqualification of a judge in any proceeding in which the judge has a financial interest, however
small. Canon 4D requires a judge to refrain from engaging in business and from financial activities that might interfere with the impartial
performance of the judge’s judicial duties. Canon 4H requires a judge to report compensation received for activities outside the judicial office.
A judge has the rights of an ordinary citizen with respect to financial affairs, except for limitations required to safeguard the proper
performance of the judge’s duties. A judge’s participation in a closely held family business, while generally permissible, may be prohibited if it
takes too much time or involves misuse of judicial prestige or if the business is likely to come before the court on which the judge serves.
Owning and receiving income from investments do not as such affect the performance of a judge’s duties.
Canon 4D(5). The restriction on using nonpublic information is not intended to affect a judge’s ability to act on information as necessary to
protect the health or safety of the judge or a member of a judge’s family, court personnel, or other judicial officers if consistent with other
provisions of this Code.
Canon 4E. Mere residence in the judge’s household does not by itself make a person a member of the judge’s family for purposes of this
Canon. The person must be treated by the judge as a member of the judge’s family.
The Applicable Date of Compliance provision of this Code addresses continued service as a fiduciary.
A judge’s obligation under this Code and the judge’s obligation as a fiduciary may come into conflict. For example, a judge should resign as a
trustee if it would result in detriment to the trust to divest holdings whose retention would require frequent disqualification of the judge in
violation of Canon 4D(3).
Canon 4F. The appropriateness of accepting extrajudicial assignments must be assessed in light of the demands on judicial resources and
the need to protect the courts from involvement in matters that may prove to be controversial. Judges should not accept governmental
appointments that could interfere with the effectiveness and independence of the judiciary, interfere with the performance of the judge’s
judicial responsibilities, or tend to undermine public confidence in the judiciary.
Canon 4H. A judge is not required by this Code to disclose income, debts, or investments, except as provided in this Canon. The Ethics
Reform Act of 1989 and implementing regulations promulgated by the Judicial Conference impose additional restrictions on judges’ receipt of
compensation. That Act and those regulations should be consulted before a judge enters into any arrangement involving the receipt of
compensation. The restrictions so imposed include but are not limited to: (1) a prohibition against receiving “honoraria” (defined as anything of
value received for a speech, appearance, or article), (2) a prohibition against receiving compensation for service as a director, trustee, or
officer of a profit or nonprofit organization, (3) a requirement that compensated teaching activities receive prior approval, and (4) a limitation
on the receipt of “outside earned income.”
CANON 5: A JUDGE SHOULD REFRAIN FROM POLITICAL ACTIVITY
A. General Prohibitions. A judge should not:
(1) act as a leader or hold any office in a political organization;

(2) make speeches for a political organization or candidate, or publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for public office; or
(3) solicit funds for, pay an assessment to, or make a contribution to a political organization or candidate, or attend or purchase a ticket for a
dinner or other event sponsored by a political organization or candidate.
B. Resignation upon Candidacy. A judge should resign the judicial office if the judge becomes a candidate in a primary or general election for
any office.
C. Other Political Activity. A judge should not engage in any other political activity. This provision does not prevent a judge from engaging in
activities described in Canon 4.
COMMENTARY
The term “political organization” refers to a political party, a group affiliated with a political party or candidate for public office, or an entity
whose principal purpose is to advocate for or against political candidates or parties in connection with elections for public office.
Compliance with the Code of Conduct
Anyone who is an officer of the federal judicial system authorized to perform judicial functions is a judge for the purpose of this Code. All
judges should comply with this Code except as provided below.
Part-time Judge
A part-time judge is a judge who serves part-time, whether continuously or periodically, but is permitted by law to devote time to some other
profession or occupation and whose compensation for that reason is less than that of a full-time judge. A part-time judge:
(1) is not required to comply with Canons 4A(4), 4A(5), 4D(2), 4E, 4F, or 4H(3);
(2) except as provided in the Conflict-of-Interest Rules for Part-time Magistrate Judges, should not practice law in the court on which the judge
serves or in any court subject to that court’s appellate jurisdiction, or act as a lawyer in a proceeding in which the judge has served as a judge
or in any related proceeding.
B. Judge Pro Tempore
A judge pro tempore is a person who is appointed to act temporarily as a judge or as a special master.
(1) While acting in this capacity, a judge pro tempore is not required to comply with Canons 4A(4), 4A(5), 4D(2), 4D(3), 4E, 4F, or 4H(3);
further, one who acts solely as a special master is not required to comply with Canons 4A(3), 4B, 4C, 4D(4), or 5.
(2) A person who has been a judge pro tempore should not act as a lawyer in a proceeding in which the judge has served as a judge or in any
related proceeding.
C. Retired Judge
A judge who is retired under 28 U.S.C. § 371(b) or § 372(a), or who is subject to recall under § 178(d), or who is recalled to judicial service,
should comply with all the provisions of this Code except Canon 4F, but the judge should refrain from judicial service during the period of an
extrajudicial appointment not sanctioned by Canon 4F. All other retired judges who are eligible for recall to judicial service (except those in
U.S. territories and possessions) should comply with the provisions of this Code governing part-time judges. A senior judge in the territories
and possessions must comply with this Code as prescribed by 28 U.S.C. §§ 373(c)(5) and (d).
Applicable Date of Compliance
Persons to whom this Code applies should arrange their financial and fiduciary affairs as soon as reasonably possible to comply with it and
should do so in any event within one year after appointment. If, however, the demands on the person’s time and the possibility of conflicts of
interest are not substantial, such a person may continue to act, without compensation, as an executor, administrator, trustee, or other fiduciary
for the estate or person of one who is not a member of the person’s family if terminating the relationship would unnecessarily jeopardize any
substantial interest of the estate or person and if the judicial council of the circuit approves.
TO SEE AUTHORITATIVE TEXT PLEASE LOG ON:- http://www.uscourts.gov/Viewer.aspx?doc=/uscourts/RulesAndPolicies/conduct/Vol02ACh02.pdf
Therefore, I understand that similar provisions be made for the Judges of the Hon’ble Courts, and the Rules be strictly adhered by the Judges
of the Hon’ble Court.

4. Averment:
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to the
government of india and constitutional bench of supreme court of india to enact / codify laws governing both official actions , private
actions of judges from munsiff level to supreme court of india.. it must also cover quasi judicial officers like police , revenue inspectors ,
excise inspectors , district collectors who perform quasi judicial functions. The law must have provision for legal prosecution of violators ,
guilty judges, guilty police & their removal from office.
That the present petitioner has not filed any other petition (which are admitted by courts) in any High Court or the Supreme Court of India on
the subject matter of the present petition.

PRAYER:
In the above premises, it is prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased:
a . Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as a PIL for : “writ of Mandamus” and to issue instructions to
the Government of India , all state governments and union terrirtories constitution bench of supreme court of india , to enact laws / codify
rules governing judges , police & quasi judicial officers with regards to their actions both official & private.
b . to pass such other orders and further orders as may be deemed necessary on the facts and in the circumstances of the case.

FOR WHICH ACT OF KINDNESS, THE PETITIONER SHALL BE DUTY BOUND, EVER PRAY.
Dated : 10th october 2016 …………………….FILED BY: NAGARAJA.M.R.
Place : Mysuru , India…………………….

PETITIONER-IN-PERSON

RTI Appeals Not Answered by SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - Crimes Cover-up

To ,
RTI Appellate Authority ,
O/O Chief Justice of India ,
Supreme Court of India ,
New Delhi.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.
ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN – 570017.
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will
have sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day
would come when even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the
independence of India & Pakistan. Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our

criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among
the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters.
Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing unavailability. If at all information is not
truly available , why didn’t the CPIO TRANSFER rti application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice ,
Respective High Courts , etc.
Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each employee including judges. If not on what basis they
give promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR can give infor mation about guilty judges. Why
CPIO not asking that person to share infor mation ?
If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for
investigation to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into tens of
pages sometimes even over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge themselves committ grave crimes
detrimental to national security , integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only cover-up , WHY ? Are Judges & Police above Law ?
Is Judge’s MAFIA at play ?
The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime. With
respect to previous RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by covering
up judges & their crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower middle class people
toiling hard to earn a few hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame to JUDGEs that they draw pay
& perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from our money , from taxes paid by us still not do their constitutional duties properly.
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES
& FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects
to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING
QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE
OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF
FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST
RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO
APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I
HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY
CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A – Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
JUDGEs or Brokers of Justice
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-or-brokers-of-justice ,
RTI & Land Golmaal
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rti-land-golmaal-in-karnataka ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
Hereby , we do request CPIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , Supreme Court of India , New Delhi to answer the
following questions in public interest , for safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-

nationals , criminals within the judiciary & police. Judges are not superior human beings , some of them have even became judges
through devious means other than merit , integrity. Judges are public servants drawing salary & perks from public exchequer and
accountable to public as any other common man is.
Please give following information :
Main A :
1. Please give me The address of salary disbursing officer in supreme court of india. Salary disbursing officer will be
maintaining service records of all employees of supreme court of india including judges. These records are used for
disciplinary action , promotion , transfer of judges. If not within SCI , please give the address of the outside public official
who maintains service records of supreme court judges and kindly compile information from him and give it to me orelse
transfer my RTI application to him.
2. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired supreme court judges with allegations against them and the action
taken thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution or not taking action.
3. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired high court judges with allegations against them and the action taken
thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution or not taking action.
4. Please give me the list of serving as well as retired district & taluk court judges with allegations against them and the
action taken thereof. Reasons for taking action / criminal prosecution or not taking action.
5. Some of the high courts are demanding higher RTI application fees than stipulated by law. Eventhough requisite fees
has been paid before transfer of RTI application to high courts. Please give me the details of action taken by supreme court
of india against erring high courts.
6. Give me the List of petitions with date made by Shri . Nagaraja Mysore Raghupathi alias Nagaraja M R TO SUPREME
COURT OF INDIA THROUGH POST , THROUGH E-MAIL & THROUGH website of DPG / DARPG. Action taken or not taken
with reasons thereof with respect to each petition.
7. Please give me list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court of india , to safe guard the HUMAN RIGHTS &
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS of Nagaraja M R editor of SOS e Clarion of Dalit & SOS e Voice for justice. He repeatedly appealed
to SCI highlighting violations of his human rights & fundamental rights. After appealing to SCI only editor Nagaraja M R
suffered more injustices , attempts on his life , etc , may be JUDGE’s MAFIA is in deal with outside MAFIA. Police are
helpless & practically don’t have power to question supreme court judges & other VVIPs. Did SCI constitute SCI monitored
enquiry committee with full legal authority to look into the issue.
8. Judges preach too much & practice less. They give lectures , judgements running into hundreds of pages eliciting
legality, moral virtues , humanity , etc. But cover up information leading to crimes / accountability of judges. The judges
committee like a mafia deals it within without subjecting the accussed judge to public scrutiny & public trial. It is almost
similar to a whore / bitch giving a lecture on virginity to women. To refresh your memory , Please go through following
websites to know about facts , actual cases of crimes by judges. Please give us information regarding action taken or not
taken with reasons there of with respect to each case mentioned in the following websites:
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

9. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by supreme court of india to safeguard the human rights of
prisoners , witnesses & evidences .
10. Please give me the list of actions , follow up actions taken by high courts of india to safeguard the human rights of
prisoners , witnesses & evidences .
11. Please give me the list of supreme court judges , high court judges & district / taluk judges (both serving & retired) who
received favourable allotment of sites , etc which is nothing but a form of kick back for favours shown by judge. Please
give me the list of action taken or not taken by supreme court of india with reasons thereof in each case.
12. Please give me the list of action taken against by supreme court of india against CPIO & PIO of supreme court of
india , who repeatedly failed to give me information . thereby , CPIO & PIO are covering up crimes of guilty judges , violating
RTI Act & violating human rights / fundamental rights of editor Nagaraja M R together with public.

Main B :

1 . How many judges are booked for graft , sexual crimes , crimes against women , irregularities , amassing disproportionate
wealth , failure of duty , getting illegal allotment of sites & other crimes since independence till date , yearwise ?
2. what action taken casewise ?
3. are the action taken similar to commoners , common people committing same type of crimes ?
4. did all the cases handled by tainted judges subjected to review , retrial by other honest judges ?
5. how many advocates were prosecuted by court for influencing witnesses / evidences , for tutored / concocted evidences , etc
since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
6. how many police officials / law enforcing officials were prosecuted by court for influencing , intimidating witnesses through
threats , 3rddegree torture , for concocted evidences , etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
7. how many police / law enforcement officials were prosecuted for lock-up deaths , fake encounters , illegal detention , 3 rd degree
torture , etc since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
8. in how many cases police / law enforcement officials were made to pay compensation to innocent victims who were wrongly
charged , detained & tortured , murdered by police , since independence till date , yearwise ? what action ? if not why ?
9. in some cases , on appeal judgements of higher court turns down the judgement of lower court. In how many such cases , lower
court judge is made to pay compensation to victims of their wrong judgement , since independence till date yearwise ? what
action ? if not why ?
10. how many judges have defaulted in filing their annual financial returns giving out their wealth , income details , yearwise since
independence till date ? what action ? if not why ?
11. how you are verifying the annual financial returns of judges ?
12. since independence , how many convicts have been sentenced to “death by hanging” , yearwise ?
13. how many death sentances were carried out & how many are pending ?
14. how many police officials were made to pay compensation & prosecuted for defamation , when innocents falsely charged by
police were acquitted , dropped from charges by courts ? if not why ?
15. how many lower court judges were made to pay compensation & prosecuted for defamation , when innocents wrongly
convicted by lower court , but on appeal higher courts acquitting , dropping them of charges ? if not why ?
16. are judges getting paid from public exchequer , for their expenses on liquor / alcohol , body massages , etc in their TA DA bill
while on tour , official visits , official parties hosted by judges ?
17. how many appeals for justice concerning public welfare , violation of human & fundamental rights , threat to lives / livelihood ,
etc were made to supreme court of india , by nagaraja mysore raghupathi alias nagaraja M R alias myself since 1990 till date ?
appeals were made through ordinary post , registered post , e-mail & by web through DARPG , DPG. What ACTION taken by
supreme court of india with respect to each appeal ?
18. due to negligence / connivance of supreme court judges injustices were meted out to public & public are still suffering
injustices. Crimes which could have been prevented by SC happened eventhough brought to early notice of supreme court. What
action against erring SC Judges ? if not why ?
19. I have repeatedly offered my services to supreme court of india , to apprehend criminals within judiciary , police & public
service. What action taken by supreme court of india ? if not why ?
20. in my legal struggle for justice , due to negligence / connivance of SCI judges I have suffered murder attempts on my life , job
losses , my newspaper closed , not getting press accreditation to my web news papers , threats by rowdies , police , etc. what
action against erring chief justice of india ? if not why ?
21. I repeatedly appealed to supreme court of india to permit me to appear as amicus curie before supreme court of india & jain
commission of enquiry regarding late PM Rajiv Gandhi assassination case. I was not permitted why ?
22. who are the judges covering-up Rajiv Gandhi assassination case ? what action taken ? if not why ?
23. Law is one & same for all , but law enforcement & law interpretation is not same for common people , Judges & Police ?
why ?

NOTE : PLEASE TAKE NOTE THAT YOUR CONTINUED NEGLIGENCE TO PROVIDE INFORMATION , JUSTICE TO EDITOR
NAGARAJA M R LEADS TO THE THREAT TO THE LIFE , LIVLIHOOD OF HIMSELF & HIS WHOLE FAMILY. YOU ARE LIABLE
TO PAY COMPENSATION. DON’T TRANSFER THIS CASE , APPLICATION TO POLICE THEY DON’T HAVE POWER TO ENQUIRE
JUDGES LET ALONE TAKE ACTION. PLEASE ENTRUST THE CASE TO TRANSPARENTLY CONSTITUTED SUPREME COURT
MONITORED ENQUIRY COMMITTEE TO LOOK INTO THE WHOLE ISSUE.

I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly
called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages ,
transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the
complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station
for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating
agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of
lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police , revenue officials , District Magistrate & Chief Justice of
India together with above mentioned accused public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake
charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.
If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for
ourselves , If anything untoward like hit & run cases , murder attempts , unnatural deaths , etc happens to me or to my
dependents or to my family members - In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police
officials will be responsible for it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to
survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to
Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property ,
etc of guilty police officials , guilty Judges , guilty public servants & guilty Constitutional functionaries.

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995-2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :
CPIO , o/o Chief Justice of India , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733465 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ……………..………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)

RTI Appeals Not Answered by SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - Crimes Cover-up

To ,
RTI Appellate Authority ,
O/O Chief Justice of India ,
Supreme Court of India ,
New Delhi.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.
ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,

HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN – 570017.

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police ,
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned judges fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals &
Freebooters.
Eventhough the information is readily available with SCI , information was denied citing unavailability. If at all information is not truly
available , why didn’t the CPIO TRANSFER rti application to concerned departments of SCI , Ministry of Law , Justice , Respective High
Courts , etc.
Does not court administarative officer posess SERVICE REECORDS of each employee including judges. If not on what basis they give
promotions , transfers , salary , etc to judges ? The person who posess SR can give infor mation about guilty judges. Why CPIO not asking
that person to share infor mation ?
If a commonman is alleged of a petty crime he is immediately arrested , put behind bars. Police spend thousands of rupees for investigation
to prosecute that petty criminal. Judges spend hours to hear that case & prepare judgements running into tens of pages sometimes even
over & above thousand pages. Fine . When the very same police & judge themselves committ grave crimes detrimental to national security ,
integrity , etc , no arrests , no prosecution only cover-up , WHY ? Are Judges & Police above Law ?
The action of CPIO SCI amounts to cover up of judges & their crimes. Thereby , CPIO is also committing a crime. With respect to
previous RTI Appeals also CPIO & RTI First Appellate Authority SCI have repeatedly committed crimes by covering up judges & their
crimes. Billions of indians are barely sustaining on a single piece meal a day , we lower middle class people toiling hard to earn a few
hundreds of rupees but still paying tax. Is it not shame to them / shame to JUDGEs that they draw pay & perks amounting to lakhs of
rupees from our money , from taxes paid by us still not do their constitutional duties properly.
GIVE WHAT ACTION HAS BEEN TAKEN AGAINST THE GUILTY JUDGES MENTIONED IN THE BELOW MENTIONED WEB SITES &
FOLLOWING ARTICLES.
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to the honest few public servants in public service including judiciary. However, the
corrupt in public service don’t deserve respect as individuals – as they are parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the chairs they
occupy but not the corrupt individuals.
All the following articles / issues , whole articles published in the weblinks mentioned below forms part of this appeal. The
term “JUDGE”mentioned throught includes all public servants discharging judicial functions right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial
officers to Chief Justice of India.
Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages & is for sale. It is a SHAME. The persons who raise their voice seeking
justice are silenced in many ways. The criminal nexus has already attempted to silence me in many ways . If anything untoward happens to
me or to my family members , my dependents , Honourable Chief Justice of India together with jurisdictional police officer will be responsible
for it.
Hereby, we do once again offer our conditional services to the honourable supreme court of India & other government authorities, in
apprehending criminals including corrupt judges & police. Herewith , we once again appeal to the honourable supreme court of India , to
consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.
The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake
it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same mistake. if a thief
steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go scot- free under his patronage.
even if a police , public servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by the aggrieved. just think , if a
judge himself that too of apex court of the land itself commits crime - violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights & human rights of public and
obstructs the public from performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ? it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty ,
those in power , criminals in public service to committ more crimes. that is exactly what is happenning in india. the educated public must
raise to the occassion & peacefully , democratically must oppose this criminalisation of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a
RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.

Kindly go through the following articles & provide justice by giving complete truthful information to us , by publicly answering the following
questionnaire in an unambiguous manner.
The constitution of India has prescribed certain FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES to each citizens of India. It is the duty of every citizen to protect &
uphold the dignity , honour of our democratic institutions , to
protect our national integrity , to respect & protect the rights of our fellow citizens. No constitutional authority has the right to obstruct the
discharge of these duties by citizens of India. No legal privileges of constitutional functionaries is superior over the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES
OF CITIZEN'S OF INDIA.

We need rights to perform our duties. Constitution of India has guaranteed those rights as FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS to all citizens of India &
by birth itself everyone of us has secured HUMAN RIGHTS as individuals. To express ourselves , we need information , data feed back , to
ascertain whether we are getting equal opportunity , whether we are getting equitable justice , etc , we need information . so ,
basically Right To Information is an inalienable part of our fundamental rights & human rights. What RTI Act has done is fixed time limit ,
responsibilities of public servants up to certain extent. However the citizen's fundamental right & human right to seek information extends far
beyond the scope of RTI Act.
Hereby , we seek complete truthful information from supreme court of India , with respect to my RTI application appeal. HEREBY , WE ARE
ONLY SEEKING ACCOUNTABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVANTS IN PUBLIC INTEREST & JUSTICE. Hereby , we request you to register this
appeal as a PIL petition & to ascertain the stand of apex court on various matters raised in my RTI Application , in public interest & equitable
justice.
We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative assemblies. our whole hearted respects to them.
HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS –
WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT
SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT
OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS
FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND
CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN
IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN
JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A – Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
Hereby , we do request PIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , PIO , O/O H.E.Honorable President of India , PIO O/O Honorable
Speaker of Lok Sabha , PIO O/O Dy Chairman of Rajya Sabha , PIOs of Karnataka Raj Bhawan , Karnataka CMO , Union Home Ministry
GOI and DG & IG of Police of Government of Karnataka to answer the following questions in public interest , for safeguarding national
security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals , criminals within the judiciary & police.
Main A :
1.

What action you have taken against judges involved in atrocities against women , casewise ? if not, why ?

2.

What action you have taken against judges involved in land scams , casewise ? if not , why ?

3. I have shown with actual cases how manipulation / fixing takes place , from complaint filing to judicial pronouncement stage. Are the
judges & police , above law ?
4.

I have numerous PILs , RTI appeals before supreme court of india. But they were not registered , not honoured , why ?

5. To my legal notice / show cause notice / damage payment notice to supreme court of india & chief justice of india , till date I have not
received the reply , why ?
6.

Is it not the duty of supreme court of india to protect the life & liberty of all Indian citizens ?

7.

Is it not the failure of supreme court of india, when it failed to protect the life of a complainant ?

8.

By negligence of their duties , are not supreme court judges aiding & abetting criminals , anti nationals & terrorists ?

9. While crores of Indians are barely surviving on a single piece meal a day , people dying due to starvation , supreme court judges are
getting salary & perks amounting to lakhs of rupees from the same suffering public / public exchequer. Are not those duty shirking judges
ashamed ?

10. What action you have taken against judges involved in hushing up late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
11. Why the supreme court of india didn’t allow me to appear before it in the said case of late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case ?
12. Why the supreme court of india didn’t protect my life , my job oppurtunities , my newspaper from the wrath of criminal nexus ?
13. When even cable TV journalists , web journalists are getting PRESS / MEDIA accreditation , my web news papers , myself are not
getting PRESS accreditation since 9 years , why ?
14. Are the supreme court judges hand in gloves with the criminal nexus ?
Main B :
You have not taken appropriate action to my previous RTI requests , Numerous appeals for justice & police complaints. You have not replied
to show-cause notice also. Your inaction has helped the criminals in manipulating & destroying evidences.
Your inaction / delay in performing your duties not only amounts to denial of information , but amounts to violation of our fundamental &
human rights , cover-up of crimes , aiding & abetting criminals . The criminal nexus tried to silence me in many ways. Is not these acts of
your’s a crime in itself ?
If your acts of crime cover-ups , information / evidence cover-ups , aiding & abetting criminals , silencing a crusader is just & legal. The same
type of acts of crimes performed by other citizens will also be legal ?
Main C :
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all constitutional institutions & to the honest few in public service. Contempt of
constitutional institutions , citizens of India is being made by the corrupt persons in constitutional positions themselves. This is an appeal to
the honest few in public service , constitutional positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to book.
1.
does the action of MPs , MLAs taking money / receiving favors from vested interests , to formulate policy decisions , to raise
questions in parliament / legislative bodies or to abstain from voting legal ?
2.

why transparent , fair investigation is not done in such cases ?

3.
just remember , the vulgar acts of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state legislature & how some MLAs vulgarly behaved with
Ms.Jayalalita in state legislature , years ago. Are these type of vulgar actions by MPs & MLAs legal ? does not these constitute contempt of
the house by MPs & MLAs themselves ?
4.
all the people’s representatives from panchayath member to president of India must read ABCD Of Democracy provide along
with.since independence of India till date , MPs & MLAs are forcing projects on people against the wishes of people , formulating policies
against the wishes of people. Are not such projects , government policies & Laws , undemocratic & illegal ?
5.

is the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of affidavits submitted by electoral candidates ?

6.

how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false affidavits ? are all the violators prosecuted?

7.

are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits yearly to vigilance authorities ? defaulters , violators how many ?

8.

what legal action taken against violators , defaulters , for giving false affidavits ?

9.

who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by MPs , MLAs ?

10.
the agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih & kin raises even during the time of severe drought , floods , fall in prices
of agricultural products , their companies register increase in turnover / profits even during recession , the trusts / NGOs set up by them
receive huge donations. Are all these income legal ?
Main D :
1.
we do once again offer our conditional services to the government of india , all state governments & supreme court of india , in
apprehending tax evaders , land grabbers , corrupt police , corrupt judges , corrupt public servants , labor law violators , etc. whom the the
government officials , vigilance authorities have failed to apprehend. Why the authorities , courts , supreme court of India , are not ready to
utilize our service ? are they afraid of being caught ?
2.
the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving information / records to us in many cases. So in the issues / cases
raised by us , the clause of time bar doe not apply. Are these delaying tactics of public servants , courts legal ?
3.

why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous police complaints made by us ?

4.
why DG & IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts to seek legal sanction for prosecution of VVIPs
( mentioned in our complaint ) , from union & state home ministries ?
5.
the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the supreme court of India & national human rights commission
has failed to undo the injustices , why ? is it because it is not a high profile case ? is it because it is not hi-fi , does not get image ratings ,
TRPs ?

6.
the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites & terrorists , by their delaying tactics & denial of information , records. What
action has been taken against such anti-national elements in public service ?
7.
how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights Activist , Mysore (editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit & SOS evoice for justice) to Karnataka police , to national human rights commission to supreme court of India till date ? what action taken with respect
to each complaint ?
8.
the delay in taking action by public servants with respect to following cases has resulted in more crimes , destruction /
manipulation of evidences , records and more injustices to commonman. Why the authorities did not take timely action against criminals in
following cases ?
SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-…
DEALS IN COURTS & POLICE STATIONS READ :
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html ,
ACCUSED Chief Justice of India
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of…
,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of…
CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF
INDIA http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI –
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE –
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE –
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE –
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218
MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
are you ready to catch tax thieves ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
reliance industry where is accountability ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
crimes at infosys campus
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ ,

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214
crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ ,
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
crimes of land mafia in India
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ ,
http://landscam.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
currency thefts in RBI Press
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80
killer colas & killer medicines of India
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/ ,
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201
HONOR OF INDIAN PALIAMENT FOR SALE
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale
Persecuted IROM SHARMILA of Puttaparthi AP – pushpa kolasani on hunger strike in anantapur district jail Andhra Pradesh
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-puttaparthi-ap
9.
how many judges are caught by authorities for doing improper , immoral & illegal acts , since independence till date ? what
action taken in each case ?
10.

what action taken against copy cat judges caught red handed while copying in public examination in Andhra Pradesh ?

11.

have you reviewed all the previous judicial decisions taken by such judges of doubtful integrity & honesty ?

12.

is it not the duty of government & supreme court of India , to protect the fundamental rights & human rights of all Indian citizens ?

13.
why the government & supreme court of India has failed to protect the fundamental rights & human rights of me & those
mentioned in my complaint ?
14.

how many former CJIs , supreme court & high court judges have disproportionate wealth ?

15.
Your denial of information to my previous RTI requests amounts to suppression of evidence , hiding crimes , what action against
erring public servants ?
16.
why my previous RTI requests or part there of was not transferred to appropriate authorities and information given to me in a
consolidated form ?

Main E :
Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake encounters ?
Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3 rd degree torture on prisoners ?
Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals & backstabs our motherland , it’s national security ?
Q4. Don’t the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare , law & order ?
Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants , industrialists , etc in the media . Then why not police taking any
action with respect to them ?
Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional functionaries , public servants in the media. Instead of wasting
money , killing time by prolonging formation of parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public
servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth & provide timely justice ?
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take action against the rich & mighty crooks. Where as
if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this
double standard ?
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT , the public servants don’t give full , truthfull
information. Still , police / courts don’t take action against those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an “amicus curie” before jain commission of enquiry or supreme court of india probing late prime
minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by snatching away my job oppurtunities in government service, by
physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false fix-ups in cases & by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police & intelligence personnel about this case , but the culprits were not enquired even

once , why ?
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police responsible for it ?
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses & all parties involved , both during case & afterwards ?
Q14. How do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel & increase in their family’s wealth year after year ?
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS officer , police verification is mandatory. While appointing
to sensitive defense establishments , research institutes in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check
candidate’s background. However is there no background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs , MLAs , , who are privy to national
secrets ? why ?
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential allegations that close relative of one of the front running
candidates have swindled public money by their bank , misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india , more than half the population are poor , people are starving
to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded & aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI
has funded & aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these terrorist outfits have murdered
thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI just & legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has
GOI paid any compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has funded & aided couter terrorist groups , is it right & legal ?
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained & funded “salwa judum” to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres
are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is this action of government just & legal ?
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there are no problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being
slapped against innocents , even children. In M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous
charges of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent political, film , sports personalities
who have links with underworld , anti national elements & attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else
where. But these hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld & fully knowing well the criminal objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms &
ammunition in his home , which were intended for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is charged
with illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to farmers who use illegal home made guns to scare away animals , birds in
their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty & rich ?
Q23. Law is one & same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it differentially between rich & poor ? why this
differentiation ?
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international criminal syndicate selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia
mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at consumer disputes
redressal forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all it’s products come with IMEI number only & stated that the product in
dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS , Mysore are not their’s as it doesn’t have IMEI numbers. Further nokia
stated they don’t have any business relationship with either tata indicom or it’s dealer. However the tata indicom dealer stated that indeed his
products are genuine , first hand products , but doesn’t have IMEI numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with tata company is selling
illegal nokia mobile hand sets & cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are without IMEI numbers best buy
for criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police are doing
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file “B” report , when after certain time limit no leads
are found in investigation ?
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to investigate case properly , so that either the case can be closed
with “B” report or the prosecution fails to prove the case in court ?
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court , when the prosecution fails ?
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order acquitting mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious big time rich criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news
paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without
any basic requirements ?
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG & IG of police , government of Karnataka on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint
was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan Mysore on same day, even copies were given to police & intelligence personnel ?
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain constitutional functionaries , so that they are not burdened
with frivolous court cases & can concentrate on their constitutional duties. But these privileges doesn’t cover the individual actions of those
public servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law enforcement / police department is
bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission & home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to
destroy evidences. Is it right & legal ?
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it cover ?
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted constitutional functionaries ?
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other people’s representatives are facing criminal charges ?
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges , yearwise since 1987 ? how many of them were
eventually convicted ?
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have contacts with underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf countries , else where ?
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other people’s representatives are wanted by police in various cases . but shown in the police records as
absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the house as usual ?
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public office before naturalization ?
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign origin ?
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin & while they are on foreign tour , from national security
perspective ?
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?

Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya swamy alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhi’s family
received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that culprit party comes to power all the cases involving it’s
partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse prosecution fails to prove it’s case & prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot
case involving shiv sainiks & others , when shiv sena – BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the cases against it’s partymen were
withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just & legal ?
Q48.what damages has been done to india’s national security due to mole in the PMO, as alleged by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?
Q49. What action by the government ?
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ?
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fix-ups , , who suffer in jail for years & acquitted by courts upon
finding them as not guilty ?
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty police officers who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake
encounters & 3rd degree torture ?
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who were responsible for gross human rights violations ,
3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in forest brigand veerappan’s territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ?
if not why ?
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my “fundamental duty” hereby do offer my conditional services to GOI & GOK to apprehend corrupt public
servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they suffer more & even their family members
suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the government provide insurance coverage to police & their family members on the lines of
defense forces ?
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable & his family ?
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily work beyond 8 hours of duty ?
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human rights ?
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING , LIVING SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS
REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING ACCORDING TO W.H.O NORMS ?
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc under the control of police department ?
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings & subtly insisting the poor to tow the line of rich or else face the
consequences , is it right & legal ? this happens mostly in real estate matters.
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his various kidnappings ?
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis about public servants involvement ?
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about misuse of office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff
court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ? if not why ?
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended with their resignation from services or his superior judge
not allotting him any judicial work ?
Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ?
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty judges to review , to undo past unjust judgements ?
Q78. how ? if not why ?
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including the wealth in the name of judge’s family members ?
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn affidavits to the higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what action is initiated against lower court judge for making
unjust judgement & meating out injustice ?
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the accussed – judges are not subjected to tests
like “poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc” , in the interest of justice & truth ?
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the members of “Karnataka state government judicial department
house building co-operative society”. Then how come , many judges including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this society
& allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said society at said society’s – judicial layout , yelahanka ,
Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons , clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the whole thing
grossly illegal ?
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or state government or government agency is one of the
parties. How many judges or their family members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol pumps , etc
by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3 rd degree torture by police , is not the judge of the respective court which
is handling that tortured person’s case responsible for it ?
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges & the police officers for committing 3 rd degree torture , on charges of
attempt to murder & murder ? if not why ?
Q89. registrar , Mysore district & sessions court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide
notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003. Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit
ranking for the post of peon.

Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in that court from the public vide notification
no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.
Q91. when a person doesn’t get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or judicial custody , is not the respective judge
dealing that person’s case responsible for it ? what action ?
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food & medical care to prisoners ?
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for periods far exceeding the legally stipulated sentence
periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one year , the judge finds him guilty of offence & gives him 3 months sentence. What about
the excess punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal , excess punishment of the convict ? what action against the
judge in such cases ?
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years & finally the judge finds them as innocents & acquits them of the charges. What about the
prison sentence , the innocent has already served ? is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ? remedy ?
what action against the judge ?
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions & the actions arising out of misuse of office ?
Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges & their personal actions as individuals ?
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional functionaries supreme ?
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ?
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors of states , members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes – scheduled caste , scheduled tribe , other backward classes , minorities & women
are their in supreme court , state high courts & subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures .
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of judges & to check corruption in judiciary ?
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ?
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official meetings , parties , at the tax payer’s expense ?
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill & claimed traveling allowance ?
Q106. what action has been taken against – selectors ie Karnataka high court judges & newly selected women judges involved in roost resort
scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?
Q107. when common people / tax payers & even government employees are not getting proper health care from government at government
hospitals. Is it right & just to provide premium health care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in India , abroad ,
all at tax payer’s expense ?
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their health , mental faculties & mental balance in the midst of all
work pressures , emotional tensions ?
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public interest litigations ?
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing “amicus curie” in a case ?
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an “amicus curie” in late P.M Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination case , was not
considered by the court ?
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting evidences . why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in
all such cases ?
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion , before providing legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy
person’s rights violation ?
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both during hearing of the case & afterwards ?
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody / judicial custody / prison sentence right ? what
action ?
Q118. when the corrupt police officer & government prosecution advocate together cover-up evidences , conducts improper investigation
intentionally to fail the case – to cover-up rich crooks , high & mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government advoctes , tax officials , officials of licensing authorities , to
ensure proper & fair prosecution of cases against rich & mighty ?
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the honourable supreme court of India ?
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers ,
land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do offer my free services to honourable supreme
court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are you – the honourable court ready to utilize it ?
Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of India , through government of india’s on-line grievance
system ( DPG & DARPG ) :
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 , DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 ,
DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 , DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/2006/80162 , DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 , DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08043 , DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 , DPG/M/2007/80003 ,
DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 , DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 ,
DPG/M/2007/80055 , DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are available at following web pages
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw
what are the status of those appeals ?
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes – rape , attempt to murder , swindling government money ,

untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag , sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for books ,
prime real estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours along with family in the name of official work , etc. by this
way , judges themselves are making contempt of court , constitution of India & citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour of the
judiciary , constitution of India & citizens of India ? please answer.
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemen’s family as being given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen &
their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans , etc ?
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with defense forces.
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term , abusing them with vulgar words wrong ?
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with vulgar words wrong ?
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ?
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an innocent person of criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in
jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be innocent ?
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police personnel & pay it as compensation to victims of police failures
& atrocities ?
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin naturalized by marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to
occupy any constitutional office ?
Q133. during british rule in india & various other british colonies , criminal cases were foisted against our freedom fighters in India & other
british colonies. After india’s independence what happened to those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it continue
with the prosecution ?
Q134. in how many cases GOI & other state government continued with the prosecution AGAINST OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or it’s colonies , to face prosecution after India gained independence ? HAS GOI
RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as per my RTI request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to
your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 , why ?
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti request , he transferred my application to others , in
turn they transferred the application to some others. Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home secretary
has got copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will he send me a consolidated reply to my present RTI
request ?
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen how defense advocate mr. R.S.ANAND & prosecution
advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences &
prosecution stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery of justice , there being numerous such
advocates in practice ?
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout more than the Prime Minister himself over the government of
India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the cabinet , to hold the
cabinet meeting of union ministers ?
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or president of India , etc ?
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article 21) ?
Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators & parliamentarians by the constitution of India?
a) Inside the House b) Outside the House
Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like
a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India
c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC
e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.
Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned constitutional functionaries ?
a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.
b) Cover both their official & personal actions.
Q146. Are the privileges defined & codified ?
Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?
Q148. Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the constitution, above the privileges of the constitutional
functionaries or equal or below ?
Q149. Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be equated to the House of commons in England which is considered to be a superior court
and court of records ?
Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary, be equated to the functioning of the House of
commons and House of Lords in England ?
Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or court and causing contempt of the house or court by
raising the issues of accountability of constitutional functionaries ?

Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify the Judicial orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples
representatives & executive ? does not it amount to infringement of Judicial powers & contempt of the court by the House.
Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional duties of a constitutional functionary or equal in
importance to it ?
Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the name of constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of
official’s secret act & go unaccountable for his actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges
Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court & Supreme court Judges and other constitutional functionaries not willing to
codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?
Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the legislature and Parliament out of tax payer’s money, they get their
pay, perks & lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles. Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian
is above or more valid in a democracy ?
Q157. Judges & Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers. Out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks
& lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat of
judge / constitutional functionary is above (more
valid) in a democracy ?
Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that vacuum till such time that the legislature or parliament acts
provide a solution by performing its role by enacting proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?
Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own cause, is it not worse for the members of the legislature
and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?
Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a citizen, protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?
Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect to numerous cases of injustices reported in Media ?
Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the Public Interest Litigation” ? In some cases, the Public or
the person representing them is unable to afford the high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.
Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. & giving free legal aid ?
Q164. Communication – free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why the constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right
to Information of Citizens ?
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice. P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all
internal departmental enquiries against approximately 200 judges , is it just & legal ? give me the names of accused judges & description of
charges against them ?
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer. F1/RTI/A91/2007.
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high court honble Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court
of India) just on assuming offices within hours scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time no
human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital decision in such short time? Who are those 200+ judges
facing enquiry ?
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge without conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates
of hearings (which happens to be government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into the previous
judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings?
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence of alchohol , as it limits the functioning of his senses &
brain. That is why the acts & sayings of drunkards , committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the police
officers after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects & produce those suspects at the residences of
magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken
police & judges work properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them & to issue judicial orders. Are these
actions of police & judges in drunken state legal ?
Q 172 . What action has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty police officials who changed the charge sheet against union
carbide officials ?
Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district magistrate , state ministers & central ministers who fully aided the
criminals – Union Carbide official Mr. Anderson to escape law , to jump bail & flee the country without court’s permission ?
Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to their contempt of court & for aiding a criminal to escape ?
Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who changed the legal clause under which the guilty should be tried ?
what action has been taken against the CJI who became an official of the trust belonging to the criminal ?
Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided to withdraw cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal
gas tragedy ?

Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department & pollution control board officials who have failed in their duties ,
inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?
Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided the quantum of compensation money to favour the criminal
although they don’t have right to do so ?
Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court , Chief Justice of India , state police officials , public prosecutors
& Central Bureau of Investigation officials who kept quite all along and didn’t press for the extradition of the criminal Mr.Anderson , for
producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial court ?
Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials & people’s representatives who became part of Operation Crime
Hush Up & aided criminals responsible for ghastly murders of thousands & maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak Tragedy?
Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt labour / pollution control board officials HUMAN BEINGS ?
Q 182 Why police are not registering my complaint against CJI & other VVIPS ,Even after years ?
Q 183 don’t the police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal jurisdiction to register the case against these VVIPs ? or just
because the criminals happens to be VVIPs ,they are not booked by police? If the said police don’t have legal jurisdiction to book these
VVIPs , they should have transferred the complaint to those authorities who have jurisdiction & authority to book & prosecute these
VVIPs , but not done so , why ?
Q 184 are not all these actions , of VVIPs & police amounting to cover up of crimes & criminals ? are not these cover ups itself is a
crime ?
Q 185. Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts of justice . however my appeals for justice concerning
public welfare , national security sent through post , e-mail to supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest litigation , why ?
does not these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals?
Q 186 Are not the honourable chief justice of india together with the jurisdictional police & Revenue district magistrate responsible to
protect the fundamental & human rights of people ? why the CJI , Mysore DC & Jurisdictional Police have failed to protect the fundamental
& human rights of people including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered at the hands of the criminal nexus Honourable CJI ,
Mysore revenue district magistrate & jurisdictional police are together responsible , if anything untoward happens to me or to my family
members or to my dependents the quartet – Honourable Chief Justice of India , Honourable District Magistrate , Mysore , Honourable Police
Commissioner of Mysore city & Circle Inspector of police , vijayanagar police station , mysore will be responsible .
These corrupt parasites will feel , understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same manner. Let us pray to almighty – In whose
Court of justice MATCH FIXING is not there & every body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths
nothing less nothing more.
YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995-2015 .
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE FULL INFORMATION:
CPIO , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.
FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733465 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ……………..………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)
Justice T.S.Thakur RESIGN from Judicial Service
To,
Shri Justice T S Thakur ,
Honourable Chie Justice of India ,
No.5 , Krishna Menon Marg ,
New Delhi – 110011.

Honourable Sir,
Subject : Honourable Chief Justice of India Resign from judicial service
Read the following articles it shows the ugly face , criminal face of Indian Police & Indian Judges. Ofcourse , there are honest few in police
service & judiciary , but their numbers are dwindling day by day. Their voices are muted. A crime can happen without the knowledge of police ,
but a crime cann’t continue for years without the knowledge , connivance of local police.

Inspite of repeated appeals , show cause notices by our publication to you , you have not replied let alone take action. You & your office staff
lack decorum , etiquette , duty consciousness of replying to letters. You are making contempt of citizens of india. But remember the basic fact
that you are enjoying 5 star pay , perks at the expense of public.
Throughout this petition & in our past appeals , the term “JUDGE” includes all public servants right from revenue inspector , officials
performing quasi judicial functions right up to chief justice of india.
In the following articles we have clearly shown how justice is delayed & justice manipulated in india. SCI & CJI is not even bothered about
health conditions , life of applicants. I am suffering from health problems caused by my previous occupation at M/s RPG Cables Ltd and am in
my final days , authorities , SCI , CJI is not bothered to give justice inspite of my repeated appeals for more than a decade.
Following two examples , actual cases highlighting the judicial delays :
1. In Mysore ideal Jawa Factory , company was locked out. Huge amounts were outstanding to banks , suppliers , employees. The land
usage , alienation could have been converted from industrial use to commercial to get higher market price and then auctioned. We appealed
for same to authorities including SCI , but they didn’t heed. It was auctioned off for lesser price , proceeds earned was far less to fully pay
outstanding amounts to banks , suppliers and employees. They were only paid less amounts , thus public banks , suppliers , employees were
cheated of their rightful dues. Afterwards the new buyer got the alienation , converted it from industrial use to commercial usage , demolished
factory building built huge residential complex and earned crores of rupees profit.
2. In mysore BEML quarters lake & Hebbal lake are encroached. In the beginning itself , I have appealed to authorities , SCI , CJI to stop the
encroachments. District magistrate at that time threatened me. Even some citizens groups led protest marches. Nobody was botherd. Today
both lakes are encroached , huge buildings , factories are functioning.
It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard the constitutional rights , fundamental rights of every Indian citizen . Since 25 years
I am appealing to SCI about issues concerning public welfare , national security , etc and as a result suffering injustices , my constitutional
rights , human rights are repeatedly violated but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made to it. Paradoxically , after these appeals
for justice , I have suffered more injustices , attempts on my life were made , physically assaulted , livelihood / jobs were denied , news
publication closed , press accreditation denied , received threatening calls , blank calls, even to date rough elements follow us , rough
elements scout near home at mid night. Does not these indicate some ties between rough elements & SCI Judges ?
Mr.T.S.Thakur , You personally as CJI is responsible for protection of our whole family & must ensure protection of our whole family. Please
don’t send police once again to our home , they lack practical powers , failed previously to enquire high & mighty. They are only interested in
taking my statement & closing the case. I have given enough statements to police , IB. Based on those statements , a supreme court
monitored CBI enquiry is appropriate, to prosecute corrupt public servants.
1. Why not police are given enough powers to summon , enquire high & mighty VVIPs ? Why my decade old complaint to DGP is not acted
upon ?
2. Why the enquiry of higher executive in M/s RBI Curreny Note Press (BRBNMPL) , PES Engineering College , NIE , RPG Cables , Mysore
District Court is not done ? These people illegally denied me job opportunities under the behest of criminals , if they are enquired they will
point to the criminal behind.
3. Why the enquiry of concerned judges is not made , who are denying information and delaying to act upon our PILs , under whose behest ?
If enquired these judges will spill the beans about criminals behind.
I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to
police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must
be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station
for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of
one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members
like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police , revenue
officials , District Magistrate & Chief Justice of India together with above mentioned accused public servants will be responsible for it. Even if
criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.
If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If
anything untoward like hit & run cases , murder attempts , unnatural deaths , etc happens to me or to my dependents or to my family
members - In such case Mr.T.S.Thakur , Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for
it , in such case the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is
eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must
be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , guilty Judges , guilty public servants &
guilty Constitutional fuctionaries.
You are delaying taking action with respect to PILs , appeals made by us concerning public welfare , national security, loss to public
exchequer , etc. Where as courts have enough time to hear trivial cases of cricket boards , etc. When you cann’t work without fear or favour
of criminals inside & outside government , you are unfit for the post . Your continuation in office only serves your self interest not the country.
Hereby , we request you to RESIGN from the position of chief justice of india and to pave the way for may be to a person who can work ,
uphold law. But you can still continue in office as a burden on public exchequer , society as some of the previous CJIs did.

We are witnessing unfit people being selected as judges by collegiums , public service commissions. Till rot in judiciary is cleared , judges
lack moral , legal right to prosecute , punish others. Only when we have honest persons in judiciary , police service then alone we can clean
criminals in judiciary , police service , government. Then alone we will get RAM RAJYA , a just society envisioned by our constitution framers.
Against common people , you judges make harsh comments , strict enforcement of law , police cruelly treat commoners , use 3rd degree
torture on commoners. Whereas against rich crooks , mafia you judges & police fail , lack spine to uphold law. You are zeroes before rich
crooks , valor of judges , police is only before commoners. Still if you have little sense of duty take action on following PILs , previous appeals
for justice by us , reply to our show cause notices , issue writ of mandamus to concerned public servants to give full truthful information to our
following & previous RTI applications.

You have failed in your constitutional duties as Chief Justice of India. It will be better if you resign from judicial services immediately, it will be
good for the society the nation as a whole. or else you can continue in service as a burden on the public exchequer , the society as some of
previous CJIs did.
Still now also you can change your work style and sincerely do your duties upholding rule of law IMPARTIALLY. Please read the details at
following web pages :
Justice Thakur RESIGN
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/justice-t-s-thakur-resign ,
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/supreme-court-apologise-to-public ,
Rot in judiciary is decades old. Honourable CJI sir , weeping is not right constitution of india has given you the authority , TAKE ACTION DO
YOUR DUTY. People , History will remember you forever with respect. Anyway you are getting very good 5 star pay & perks , will also get
decent pension after retirement from government. First forget about post retirement postings , discretionary allotment of sites , etc from
government then you can work fearlessly. Both central & state governments are biggest litigants in the country , IAS babus make wrong
application , interpretation of laws leading to litigations. Start by clearing the rotten eggs within the judiciary. When judiciary & police in a
country strictly uphold law , work impartially that country surpasses even heaven.
Do remember on the D Day , in the Court of Almighty everybody CJI , Judges , prime ministers , common man alike has to bow his head. In
who’s court there is no match fixing , no technicalities , no vociferous hi fi advocates , no bias based on caste , religion , region , community ,
etc , only straight simple account of wrongs & rights. Guess his judgement in your case. GOD BLESS US ALL.
Jai Hind. Vande Mataram.

Date : 07.07.2016………………..Your’s sincerely ,
Place : Mysuru………………………..Nagaraja.M.R.

Police Complaint against CJI
To,
H.E. Honourable President of India ,
Rashtrapathi Bhawan ,
New Delhi.

Honourable Sir ,
Subject : Police Complaint against Honourable Chief Justice of India
I have sent numerous appeals to CJI , SCI through post , e mail , web since 1993 regarding crimes , specific crime cases , no action by CJI or
SCI. In some criminal cases which has been brought to their earlier notice , CJI & SCI could have prevented it , prevented the crimes from
happening , but they didn’t. They let the crime happen & let it continue till date. They might have received something in return for favoring the
criminals. Let the almighty give dog’s death to such former CJIs and their family members who thrive like PARASITES on BRIBEs & Public
Money without properly doing public duties. CJI is not answering our RTI questions properly nor admitting , acting on our PILs. He is not even
replying to our show cause notices. It is nothing but individual failure of duties by previous CJIs and present CJI Justice. T.S.THAKUR.
Previous CJIs and Present CJI Justice T.S.THAKUR are taking huge salaries , enjoying 5 star life style out of tax payments made by we the
common people , public , child labourers. Have the previous CJIs , Present CJI Justice T.S.THAKUR sincerely done their constitutional duties
to earn it ? Money not earned will be either stolen or donation or alms.

Thereby CJI is aiding criminals , anti nationals , terrorists and underworld mafia. Hereby , I do appeal to you take action against the erring CJI
and accord legal sanction to criminally prosecute chief justice of india and to transfer the complaint to respective jurisdiction police for
investigation & legal prosecution. Thank You.

Date : 23.04.2016……………………………………………………………………………… Your’s Sincerely,
Place : Mysuru………………………………………………………………………………………Nagaraja.M.R.

SHOW CAUSE Notice to Honourable Chief Justice of India Justice T S Thakur

We the sufferers of Injustices , suffering public WISH DOG’S DEATH TO CORRUPT JUDGES , CORRUPT POLICE & THEIR FAMILY
MEMBERS WHO THRIVE ON BRIBES. In the court of Almighty , God there is no match fixing , we pray to that almighty to give dog’s death ,
death , suffering due to accident , kidney problem , heart problem , etc to corrupt judges , corrupt police & their family members who
shamelessly thrive on bribes , looted public money. They must not have sudden death , they must suffer for months before death. Then alone
they will realize the pain of the public.
We whole heartedly salute honest few , honest judges , honest police & honest public servants who are tirelessly upholding rule of law inspite
of many obstacles , threat to themselves. We pray to almighty to give strength , health , wealth , longevity to such honest persons.
I have sent numerous appeals to CJI , SCI through post , e mail , web since 1993 regarding crimes , specific crime cases , no action by CJI or
SCI. In some criminal cases which has been brought to their earlier notice , CJI & SCI could have prevented it , prevented the crimes from
happening , but they didn’t. They let the crime happen & let it continue till date. They might have received something in return for favoring the
criminals. Let the almighty give dog’s death to such former CJIs and their family members who thrive like PARASITES on BRIBEs & Public
Money without properly doing public duties.
It is nothing but individual failure of duties by previous CJIs and present CJI Justice. T.S.THAKUR. Previous CJIs and Present CJI Justice
T.S.THAKUR are taking huge salaries , enjoying 5 star life style out of tax payments made by we the common people , public , child
labourers. Have the previous CJIs , Present CJI Justice T.S.THAKUR sincerely done their constitutional duties to earn it ? Money not earned
will be either stolen or donation or alms.
One of the favors enjoyed by Judges for favoring criminal nexus of ruling politicians , tacitly aiding the crimes of ruling government is the
discretionary allotment of sites to judges by the government.
I don’t know whether secretariat staff of CJI office & DARPG / DPG officials are forwarding my appeals for justice , e-mails to you or not. They
will be held accountable for their lapses if any. This notice is against the repeated failure of constitutional duties & indirect collusion with
criminals by previous CHIEF JUSTICEs OF INDIA. Notice is served against them , to the office of CJI , NOT personally against you. At the
individual level I do whole heartedly respect Honourable Justice Shri T S Thakur .
Please refer two my appeals for justice through DARPG ;
DLGLA/E/2013/00292
DEPOJ/E/2013/00679
In india democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic freedom RIGHT TO INFORMATION & EXPRESSION , is not honoured by
the government,as the information opens up the crimes of V.V.I.Ps & leads to their ill-gotten wealth. The public servants are least bothered
about the lives of people or justice to them. these type of fat cats , parasites are a drain on the public exchequer . these people want ,wish me
to see dead , wish to see HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH closed . so that, a voice against injustices is silenced forever , the crimes of V.V.I.Ps
closed , buried forever.
To my numerous appeals , HRW’s appeals to you ,you have not yet replied. It clearly shows that you are least bothered about the lives of
people or justice to them .it proves that you are hell bent to protect the criminals at any cost. you are just pressurising the police to enquire me
,to take my statement, to repeatedly call me to police station all with a view to silence me.all of you enjoy “legal immunity privileges” ,why
don’t you have given powers to the police / investigating officer to summon all of you for enquiry ?or else why don’t all of you are not
appearing before the police voluntarily for enquiry ?at the least why don’t all of you are not sending your statement about the case to the
police either through legal counsel or through post? you are aiding criminals ,by denying me job oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE
PRESS mysore , city civil court ,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc & by illegally closing my newspaper.
there is a gross, total mismatch between your actions and your oath of office. this amounts to public cheating & moral turpitude on your part.
1.you are making contempt of the very august office you hold.
2.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.
3.you are making contempt of citizens of india.

4.you are sponsoring & aiding terrorism & organized crime.
5.you are violating the fundamental & human rights of the citizens of india and of neighbouring countries.
6.you are violating & making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER to which india is a signatory.
7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a citizen of india.
8. As a result of your gross negligence of constitutional duties you have caused me damages / losses to the tune of RUPEES TWO CRORE
ONLY.
Read full case details at :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/chief-justice-terror-links
you are hereby called upon to Pay damages to me and SHOW-CAUSE within 30 days , why you cann’t be legally prosecuted for the above
mentioned crimes .
If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages ,
transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer
of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits
are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to
me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above
mentioned accussed public servants , Chief Justice of India & Jurisdictional District Magistrate will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus
levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors
of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare
Fund. afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty judges , police
officials , public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries. Thanking you. Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.

Date : 23.04.2016……………………………………………...your’s sincerely,
Place : Mysore , India………………………………………….Nagaraja M R

RTI APPEAL NOT ANSWERED BY DOT / BSNL

To ,
Shri. L.K. Govil ,
GM (Coordination) & RTI Appellate Authority ,
BSNL Corporate office ,
Room No .27 , IR Hall , Eastern Court Complex ,
Jan Path Road , New Delhi – 110001.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.
ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN – 570017.

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police ,
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned DOT officials fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals &
Freebooters. To my previous RTI requests & appeals they tried covering – up crores worth SCAM by transferring application from one to
the other at the end by denying information to me, Does not the DOT possess information with respect to tenders given by it to suppliers.
Is it not the duty of DOT QUALITY Circle to monitor the supplies from suppliers ? Then who has got it ? why don’t you transfer the RTI
application to that authority or ask for information from them ?
We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME
WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION
SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL
STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL
RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL
FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING
TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS.
M/s Karnataka Telecables Ltd , Mysore renamed as M/s RPG Telecom Ltd again renamed as M/s RPG Cables Ltd once again renamed
as M/s KEC International , Mysore used to manufacture PIJF & OFC telecables and supplied it to department of telecommunications ,
government of india , Indian Railways and GAIL , PGCIL of Ministry of Petroleum . DOT used to pay hundreds of crores of rupees from
public exchequer to buy these cables . There is also one more company by name M/s Concepta Cables Ltd , Mysore belonging to the
same industrial group supplying PIJF & OFC telecables to DOT. As a public , as a citizen of india and as a tax payer I want to know
whether those crores of rupees from public exchequer are well spent.
1. How many times the above said companies were blacklisted by DOT , Supreme Court of India and other quasi judicial bodies ,
casewise ?
2.

What action taken by DOT & judicial bodies against the above companies , casewise ?

3.

How many cable kms of cable supplied by above companies , were rejected by DOT from the field yearwise , since 1986 ?

4.

Did the above companies replace all the cables rejected by DOT & make good all the losses , yearwise ?

5.

If not , why ?

6.

What action taken by DOT , casewise ?

7.

How many cable kms of cables supplied by above companies were accepted on deviation by DOT yearwise ? on what basis ?

8.

Has the DOT authorised usage of recycled materials in the manufacture of cables ?

9.

If yes , on what basis ?

10. Did DOT authorize outsourcing of cable manufacturing process by above companies to third parties , casewise ?
11. How many cable kms of telecom cables supplied by above companies have failed during usage within the warranty period ,
yearwise ?
12. Did the above companies honour warranty contract in all such cases ?
13. If not why , casewise ?
14. What action by DOT , casewise ?
15. Who maintains records of DOT / BSNL tenders given out to Suppliers specifically with respect to tenders given to M/s Karnataka
Telecables Ltd , M/s RPG Telecom Ltd , M/s RPG Cables Ltd , M/s Concepta Cables Ltd & M/s KEC International Ltd ?
16. How may rejections / adverse reports , deviations found in the supplies made by above companies by DOT / BSNL Quality Circle ?
17. What action taken against BSNL / DOT officials who are trying to cover-up the scam inspite of my repeated appeals & RTI requests ?
YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995-2015 .
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :
CPIO , BSNL HQ , New Delhi.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733463 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ……………..………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.
PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)

RTI APPEAL NOT ANSWERED BY RBI

To ,
RTI Appellate Authority ,
O/O Honourable Governor ,
Reserve Bank of India ,
Central Office Building , Shahid Bhagat Singh Marg ,
Mumbai – 400 001

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN – 570017.

"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police ,
RBI Officials , public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned public servants fall among the category of churchill’s men –
Rogues , Rascals & Freebooters. RBI Officials are denying me information under one pretext or the other and covering-up SCAM worth
crores of rupees.

We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME
WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION
SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL
STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL
RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL
FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING
TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS.

HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. WITH RESPECT TO CASE NO old CC34 / 1989 & NEW NO
SC436/1991 AT 21
ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE

CHARGE SHEETED OFFICER MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE
CHARGE SHEET NO staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985
Amended charge sheet staff no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985

1. Why didn't you notice the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 & 79 till the mid of 1979 ?
2. This crime came to light only due to anonymous phone calls of good Samaritans to authorities , but not due to your inspection . is
your inspection division working properly ?
3. why there is no security check up of officers during entry & exit out of premises ?
4. why there is no individual weighment , individual statement of value of bags of reissuable notes & bags of note meant for destruction , after
sorting is done, why they are not tallied with total weight , value of notes issued for sorting ?
5. Immediately after noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all the employees of those sections ?
6. why did not you take steps to preserve3 & protect respective documents relating to such high profile crime ?
7. why didn't you immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed & waited till 1983 ?
8. Why RBI has left out , so many officers ( who worked in the same sections for more period than accused officers ) from domestic enquiry ?
9. why CBI also failed to put those people in the charge sheet before the court ?
10. is it because they were in favorable terms with the vested interests ?
11. did the CBI dance to the tune of vested interests in RBI while preparing charge sheet & during investigation , instead of independent
investigation ?
12. those left out probables from the charge sheet might have caused the destruction of evidences / records. During the course of
domestic enquiry / court proceedings , it has been recorded that some records have been destroyed. Are not CBI & RBI responsible for
destruction of evidences , aiding true criminals get away ?
13. in normal times , what is the period specified in RBI regulations for preserving old documents / records ?
14. after noticing such a high profile crime the RBI must have taken utmost care to preserve such old records for indefinite time , for producing
before courts of law as & when demanded. But it didn't , why ?
15. does not this point to connivance of higher authorities of RBI , with the criminals ?
16. RBI authorities have conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead of individual enquiries , is it not detrimental to the rights of defense ?
17. RBI authorities have stated that court proceedings & domestic enquiry are independent of each other & are not binding on one another.
However RBI authorities straight away took on record of domestic enquiry the court statements , evidences , but didn't honour the order of
same court of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?
18. The alleged crime was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was framed in mid 1985 , why this long delay ?
19. didn't this facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy , manipulate evidences ?
20. as stated before court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note packet were missing , who is responsible for it ?
21. has the CBI conducted enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher officers - S.N.RAZDAN , W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA & others , if
not why ?
22. is it not due to inefficiency , negligence of duty by such high ranking managers , that such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?
23. what disciplinary action RBI has taken against the inefficient , negligent higher officials ?
24. whatever internal rules an organization makes must be within the line of law. If such internal laws of the organization are violative of law ,
fundamental rights of employees , such internal rules become illegal. Are not the way of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?
25. as per RBI pension regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct any loss caused to the bank , from the pension of RBI employee if
the misconduct of employee is proved in judicial proceedings . even though mr.G.Hariram came out clean from the court , why RBI has
denied his pension ?
26. judicial courts of law are appellate authorities over & above , domestic enquiry committees & judicial orders supersedes the
domestic enquiry proceedings. Still RBI showed contempt of court & didn't reinstate mr..G.Hariram into service , why ?

27. even if an employee's misconduct causing loss to the bank is proved , before denying him pension (towards making up loss to the bank) ,
previous sanction of the central board of RBI must be taken. But in mr.G.Hariram's case , pension was denied in full without taking previous
sanction of the central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?
28. RBI alleged that mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000 to the bank & recovered it from his provident fund dues. There
was nothing left over to recover , still RBI completely denied pension to mr.G.Hariram , why ?
29. ideally, domestic enquiry findings / disciplinary actions should be completed first , then the employee can appeal to appropriate court of
law. In mr.G.Hariram's case , CBI & RBI failed to prove the charges in court of law , as a result court discharged him from the charges. To
cover-up it's failures RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much beyond court orders date & gave findings indicting mr..G.Hariram.
does the enquiry officer of domestic enquiry think that he is over & above the court of law ? is it not illegal & contempt of court ?
30. ideally , RBI authorities should have appealed to higher court against lower court order discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But it was
not done , why ?
31. did the RBI pay interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension period ?
32. the undue delay in filing charge sheet , consequent destruction of key evidences , dishonour / contempt of court orders , undue haste
in giving findings , dismissal , denial of of pension without central board's sanction , all point towards criminals within RBI higher management.
What disciplinary action has been taken against
J.P.AWASTHI, S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF & others ? if not why ?
33. why charge sheet was amended? Is it legal ?
34. did the charge sheet was amended to falsely implicate mr..G.Hariram , by including cancelled note vault in the charge sheet ?
35. does not this itself show that it is not statement of actual happenings / facts , but a cunning ploy to mislead investigation towards fixed
innocents from actual criminals ?
36. is it true that that only 5% of sample inspection is done out of bundled verified defective note packets ?
37. is not the conduct of joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted officers illegal ?
38. how come such an important evidence 22nd note packet went missing ?
39. is it because it may point towards real criminals ?
40. as per the statement of management witness / inspection head / expert mr.vijendra rao , the notes of earlier dates have been
removed from packets made into new bundles , right ?
41. as per his statement , entire certificates , seals of some asst treasurers are there , who didn't work at all on that day is not it ?
42. does not it show that some body else was misusing the seals , putting some innocents seals over the notes ?
43. does it not show that , crime has taken place at verification section ?
44. does it not show involvement of some asst treasurers ?
45. why asst treasurers have not been charge sheeted ?
46. why inspection of RBI Bangalore office was not done between 1975 & 1979 ?
47. is it not true that you failed to produce all records showing internal inspection / audits , during domestic enquiry & court proceedings ?
48. your expert mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are smudged , he has stated some seal marks appears to be so & so. He
has clearly nowhere stated that this seal mark is exactly this , so he himself is not 100% sure ?
49. your expert nowhere said that 100% sure this seal mark is this , on that day this seal was issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn't it ?
50. your expert says during 1975 , he didn't notice3 any fraud. However approver says fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no action
has been taken ?
51. why you didn't produce all records of all persons , who have specifically worked in alleged sections , the registers of those departments
with daily activity report containing seal nos , packet nos , bag nos , etc ?
52. are not their chances of some criminals putting the seal marks of innocent officers over the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?
53. your expert is not 100% sure of seal mark , your records are not there to prove the presence of charge sheeted officers in the
alleged sections , neither your expert nor your records are 100% sure on what date , at what stage , by whom crime was committed , isn't it ?
54. is not the charge sheet amounting to higher ups picking up officers they dislike & falsely implicating them ?
55. is it not cunning ploy of higher ups to divert attention from original criminals ?
56. why no action was taken against currency officer of 1977-79 mr.J.Mitra ? why his pension , super annuation benefits were not withheld ?

57. what is your justification , supporting evidence , records for picking up only three officers including mr.G.Hariram for legal prosecution and
leaving the majority of probables ?
58. why you have dropped charges against five asst treasurers ? why you didn't even conduct domestic enquiry against them , let alone legal
prosecution ?
59. Is it RBI's & CBI's way of fair play & justice ?
60. as inly 5% sampling of verified note bundles are done , there are more possibilities of rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed 95%
lot , isn't it ?
61. you have left out so many officers who worked in those sections, some of whom even became management witnesses , instead of
being charge sheeted by the management, is it fair play & legal ?
62. who are the bank employees , from whom you have recovered the alleged bank loss of Rs.220000 ?
63. were all of them charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted , dismissed & their pension , gratuity withheld ?
64. you don't have any internal statuotary records to prove that mr.G.Hariram worked in those departments , except a currency
officer's office note dated just on the eve of charge sheet years after the alleged crime ? does it not prove that this note has been
concocted just to fix mr.G.Hariram ?
65. where as you have records of other officials attendance in those departments , but not charge sheeted them why ?
66. three officers of staff grade A daily work in three sections out of 40 officers , why you have picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of 1095
working days , he has worked for only 223 days in those sections , still those officers who worked for more days in those sections are not
charge sheeted why ? the approver , the management expert witness , shift registers , V2 registers , Destruction certificates , Form CD 55 ,
etc , nobody , no records were able to say on what date , at what stage , by whom crime took place , also they were unable to say on what
date at what stage crime was committed by mr.G.Hariram ? is it not futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI
higher authorities to fix innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?
67. the management expert witnesses said , the most probable place of crime is punching / Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where
asst treasurers were joint custodians . they were not enquired & let off why ?
68.
the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution of defaced note packets. Where as the management expert witness say substitution
of defaced notes only ? is not there difference between loss of one number of note & 100 number of notes ?
69.
as per the normal course of duty , staff officers does not count notes in each bundles , but they just count the number of bundles
only. Is not there chances of inserted note bundles or bundles containing less number of notes going unnoticed ? is it not the failure of
statuotary system of work practices ?
70.

does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI & CBI were hell bent to fix mr.G.Hariram & to shield the original criminals ?

Questions with respect to other cases :
71.

how do you monitor the work of bank officials nominated as directors of companies which have availed bank loans ?

72.

how do you monitor the work of companies , in which banks have invested ?

73.
how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of certain bank officials , who work in shares investment / equity funds
section , etc ?
74.
inspite of project reports by bank officials , over assessment of collateral securites /
value of debtor companies by bank officials , the loans become NPAs & full value cann't be realized in the market by selling off the assets of
debtor companies also. In such cases , what action is taken against erring bank officials who collude with criminal industrialists for availing
higher amount of loan than
permissible ?
75.

give bankwise specific figures of NPAs.

76.
give names of industrial groups / promoters whose companies have become NPAs , so that public can be aware of them , before
investing in new companies promoted by them.
77.

is not collection of loan from debtors of bank through rowdies / recovery agents , illegal ?

78.

why not criminal complaints filed against bank mangers for aiding , abetting rowdism , murdering people ?

79.
if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans of Rs. 10000 from commoners is right , what would you do to a promoter of
a debtor company to recover loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ? but debtors of crores of rupees is let off coolly by banks , why ?
80.

what is the exact amount of loss caused to the exchequer by karim lala telgi who printed fake stamp papers ?

81.

what action has been taken against those involved ?

82.
have you taken action against all those mentioned by telgi during narco analysis test , if not why ? is it because they are powerful &
bigwigs ?

83.

how you are controlling the illegal finance activities , money lending by individuals , pawn brokers & chit fund companies ?

84.

how you are monitoring the receipt of public donations , foreign donations by many NGOs ?

85.

how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies , pawn brokers , individuals you have booked for illegal finance activities ?

Questions relating to RBI CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE
86. who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at security press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?
87. who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for what criminal roles ?
88. how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?
89. who is responsible for installing, operating & supervising the security set-up in R.B.I ?
90. how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are accounted for in inward stores & while issuing for printing ?
91. how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process are accounted for?
92. How the finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?
93. Who keeps physical figures & possession of goods, inventory of all the above?
94. How the scrap paper is disposed off ?
95. From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?
96.

Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of stores assistant in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?

97.

give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process assistant at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?

98.
give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process assistants & maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the year
1996-1998 ?
99.

is not RBI & BRBNMPL authorities created by statutory laws , fully funded by public money ie from government exchequer ?

100. still why BRBNMPL & RBI refused to answer my previous information request as per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons will come
out of cubboard ?
101. what action initiated against the SBI branch Bangalore & SBI Overseas branch for loss of cheque / draft amounting to crores of rupees
? if not why ?
102. give me specific figures bank wise with respect to loss caused to the bank by loss of cheques or demand drafts , etc ?
103. how RBI is containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs causing huge losses to the banks to the tune of crores of rupees ?
104. what action taken against the RBI officials who are covering up crimes inspite of my repeated appeals & RTI requests ?

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995 - 2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :
CPIO , C/o PCGM and Secretary , Secretary’s Department , Reserve Bank of India , 16 th floor, Central Office Building , Shahid Bhagat
Singh Marg , Mumbai – 400 001

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733466 for rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ……………..………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)

RTI APPEAL PRICIPAL SECRETARY CMO GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA NOT ANSWERING

To,
Shri. Dr.Sindhe Bhimsen Rao . H ,
RTI APPELLATE AUTHORITY & CPIO ,
Additional Secretary to Chief Minister ,
Room No 236 , 2nd Floor ,
Vidhana Soudha , Bangalore – 560001.

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.
ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN – 570017.

Please go through the some of actual criminal cases of land grabbings enclosed herewith.
"Power will go to the hands of rascals, , rogues and freebooters. All Indian leaders will be of low calibre and men of straw. They will have
sweet tongues and silly hearts. They will fight among themselves for power and will be lost in political squabbles . A day would come when
even air & water will be taxed." Sir Winston made this statement in the House of Commons just before the independence of India & Pakistan.
Sadly , the forewarning of Late Winston Churchill has been proved right by some of our criminal , corrupt people’s representatives , police ,
public servants & Judges. Some of the below mentioned officials fall among the category of churchill’s men – Rogues , Rascals &
Freebooters. To my previous RTI requests & appeals they tried covering – up crores worth SCAM by transferring application from one to
the other at the end by denying information to me, Does not the Revenue department possess information ?
We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME
WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS – WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION
SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL
STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING PEOPLE’S FUNDAMENTAL
RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL
FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING
TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN
LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

Main A :
1. The land encroachments & illegal buildings and it’s continued existence since years is not possible without tacit , covert
support of jurisdictional revenue officials. What disciplinary action has been taken against concerned officials with respect to each
case of land encroachment & illegal buildings , case wise ?
2.

If not , why ?

3.

Is not “land AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME” itself illegal ?

4.

Is not the move of government of Karnataka to legalise land encroachments & illegal buildings , in itself illegal ?

5. Till date in some cases of land encroachers are evicted & some buildings violating building byelaws demolished , you could have
spared them to enjoy the benefit of land akrama sakrama scheme. Why you didn’t spare them ?
6.

Is this scheme applicable for only chosen few ?

7.

Does this scheme also benefit rich people above BPL ?

8.

Does this scheme also benefit big land developers , land developing companies ?

9. To my previous RTI appeals to MUDA , BDA only partial information was given , conveniently hiding the truth. Is it not violation of
RTI act ?
10. Does not hiding information about land crimes , in itself also a crime ?
11. I have shown in detail some land crimes in Karnataka. What action by government of Karnataka , casewise ?
12. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
13. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
14. Does not hiding a land crime , embolden land grabber to commit more land crimes ?
15. What action taken against BDA , MUDA & Revenue department officials who are covering crores worth land scams inspite of my
repeated appeals & RTI Requests ?

Main B : RTI QUESTIONS Mysore DC , COMMISSIONER OF MUDA ( MYSORE URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ) &
COMMISSIONER OF MCC ( MYSORE CITY CORPORATION ) ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the mysore city's comprehensive city development
plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the authorities ?
4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?
6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site & commercial site
? if not why ?
7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws – no set off , no parking space , no
emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action
status report yearwise ?
9. how much of MUDA's / MCC's / GOVERNMENT's lands , sites , buildings & houses have been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers
since 1987 ?
10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report
yearwise ?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just
through MUDA's / MCC's resolution instead of of reallotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list ,
after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?
12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what
is the procedure followed ?
13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing societies
, real estate firms among them are legally authorized by MUDA , MCC , GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since 1987 till date ?
14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies & illegal real estate firms ? if not
why ?

15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms & housing societies who have violated MUDA norms ,
layout plans , etc ? if not why ?
16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc
keeping high in the mind safety of people first. MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the
building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators & legalizing those
violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are totally neglected by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT . When public people die , suffer
injuries / accidents – say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a
business complex as the complex doesn't have a parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road
resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports
persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?
18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building
temporary huts , MUDA / AUTHORITIES with the help of police razes down those huts & evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when
cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA , MCC / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build big complexes earning
thousands of rupees monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even files police complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation
by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by MUDA / MCC GOVERNMENT ?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise
figures ?
22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES recovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?
24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals – tresspassers ? if not why ?
25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient time to bidders about it's auction schedules ?
26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?
27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?
28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers & selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real
estate agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging
to village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the
villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by MUDA
MCC or other land developers ?
31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?
32. in & around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent
structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The
authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out
advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the movement of
service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures under
& surrounding HT lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures
yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?
34. in & around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA & private developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is
directly let into lake , ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by MUDA , MCC & other developers , housing societies ?
36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the
sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment & creating

public health hazard ? how the MUDA / MCC is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around mysore city ? what action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against
them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .
38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non agricultural
purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private
industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB's
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?
40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA's / MCC's CDP & KIADB's industrial area development plan ? violations how
many ?
42. is the MUDA & KIADB revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers &
Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?
43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar's report on land grabbings in mysore ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in
front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if
not why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase
of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?
46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for alienation ?
47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government ,
banks , employees were cheated off their dues & the private firm made huge profits. is this auction & alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will
use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the
stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by MUDA , MCC or government in such cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by MUDA , MCC & government action
taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?
50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by MUDA , MCC or authorities , on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till
date ?
51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given media publicity ? if not why ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC / REVENUE officials & their family members , who have land
acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the
said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?
54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public auction ?
55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period
?

Main C : RTI – QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ( BDA ) , COMMISSIONER , BRIHATH
BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE ( BBMP ) & CHAIRMAN , KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD ( KIADB)
ARE AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the Bangalore city's comprehensive city
development plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the authorities ?

4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to commercial , what norms are followed by BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do you deprive people of civic amenities ?
6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference between civic amenity site &
commercial site ? if not why ?
7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building bye-laws – no set off , no parking space , no
emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the
action status report yearwise ?
9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , buildings & houses have been illegally occupied by criminal
tresspassers since 1987 ?
10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide
status report yearwise ?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has legalized , regularized such illegal occupation
just through BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT ` s resolution instead of of re-allotting the same through public notification to the next
senior most in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?
12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites , houses , etc to the illegal
occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?
13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have mushroomed , Land allotments of how many housing
societies , real estate firms among them are legally authorized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since 1987 till
date ?
14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing societies & illegal real estate
firms ? if not why ?
15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms & housing societies who have violated BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?
16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities , parking space , emergency fire exit , etc
keeping high in the mind safety of people first. BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on
the building byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators & legalizing those violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are totally
neglected by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT. When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents – say during a fire tragedy in a
complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex doesn't have a
parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not
the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands , sites , houses to renowned
sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?
18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from these out of turn allotments by BDA / BBMNP
/ KIADB / GOVERNMENT? specific figures yearwise since 1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT sites
building temporary huts , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT with the help of police razes down those huts & evicts the poor by brute
force. Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees &
build big complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or authorities not even files police
complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine. Why this double standard by BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ?
yearwise figures ?
22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal occupation ? status report yearwise since
1987 ?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT arecovered the rents earned by illegal
occupation ?
24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals – tresspassers ? if not why ?

25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient time to bidders about it's auction schedules ?
26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?
27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose mentioned in the project plan ?
28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers & selling it at a premium , by way making
profits just like a real estate agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for the usage of whole village , lands belonging
to village temples. Some villagers have donated their personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the
villagers are stake holders , owners of such lands. When BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay
compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other land developers ?
31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created till date ?
32. in & around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per Indian electricity act , no permanent
structures should be under the HT lines. However there are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The
authorities Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of those
areas spending lakhs of taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line.
Are all these structures under & surrounding HT lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific
figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise ?
34. in & around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & private developers , the sewage
water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & other developers , housing
societies ?
36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate developers , housing societies are dumping the
sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment & creating
public health hazard ? how the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report yearwise since
1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around bangalore city ? what action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .
38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by private real estate developers for non
agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to
private industries , multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie
conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is it within the KIADB's comprehensive
industrial area development plan ?
40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before alienation of such
lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT's industrial area development plan ?
violations how many ?
42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real
estate developers & Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?
43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar's report on land grabbings in mysore ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in
front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if
not why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any pre-qualification to bidders that after purchase
of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only industries can participate in the bidding process ?
46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for alienation ?

47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's newspaper . no action , why ? as a result , the government ,
banks , employees were cheated off their dues & the private firm made huge profits. is this auction & alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at preferrential rates , for the reason that they will
use it for public / social welfare. however many of the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the
stated public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT in such cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?
50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT, on what legal grounds ? ATR
since 1987 till date ?
51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given media publicity ? if not why ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT officials & their family members , who
have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities ?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in
turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly to others ?
54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of lease period , without public
auction ?
55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to the lessee before the expiry of
lease period ?
56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide BDA allotment letter no: 310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt
11/08/1978.
57. why BDA didn't file police complaint to evict encroachers?
58. why BDA didn't inform the descendents of original allottee about the cancellation of their allotment ?
59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?
60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal encroacher just by the resolution of BDA committee legal ?
61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , first it must have informed the original allottee about cancellation of allotment allowing
them sufficient time to reply with public notice in news papers , then they should have allotted the said house to the senior most in the waiting
list. But BDA has just allotted the house to an illegal encroacher by the resolution of BDA committee. Is it legal ?
62. BDA officials gave half truths to my RTI request & stated that the said file concerning this issue cann't be found ie lost . is it legal ?
63. has the BDA filed police complaint regarding theft of file from the record room ? HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF BDA PLEASE
REFER THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE.
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO YEAR 1995 - 2015 .

PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER WHO FAILED TO GIVE INFORMATION :
PIO , CHIEF MINSTER’S OFFICE , GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA , VIDHANA SOUDHA , BANGALORE.

FEES PAID : IPO 16G 733464 for Rupees TWENTY only

DATE : 28.03.2015 ……………..………………………NAGARAJA.M.R.

PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA….. ……………………….( APPLICANT)

DECLARATION
Name : ...........................NAGARAJA.M.R.
Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE
- 570017 INDIA
Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S - e – Voice For Justice
Periodicity : WEEKLY
Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB
Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions either for ourselves or on behalf of other
organizations / individuals .
Monetary gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my websites or web news paper or otherwise.
Owner/editor/printer/publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.
Nationality : INDIAN
Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice is donated to JSS Medical
College , Mysore

( Donation No. 167 dated 22 / 10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of

criminal nexus , my body must be handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes of medical students.
Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e – clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-e-Voice for Justice are donated to Mysore Eye
Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over to Mysore
Eye Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye transplantation to the needy.
Home page :
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/sosevoiceforjustice/ ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper / ,
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice / ,
http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com/ ,
http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com ,
http://paper.li/f-1368369249

Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,
UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479
Cell : 91 8970318202

It is the duty of Supreme Court of India to Protect , Guard the constitutional rights , fundamental rights of every Indian citizen .
Since 25 years I am appealing to SCI about issues concerning public welfare , national security , etc and as a result suffering
injustices , my constitutional rights , human rights are repeatedly violated but SCI is mum even when repeated appeals were made
to it. Paradoxically , after these appeals for justice , I have suffered more injustices , attempts on my life were made , physically
assaulted , livelihood / jobs were denied , news publication closed , press accreditation denied , received threatening calls , blank
calls, even to date rough elements follow us , rough elements scout near home at mid night. Does not these indicate some ties
between rough elements & SCI Judges ?

I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to
police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must
be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station
for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of
one sided questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members
like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police , revenue
officials , District Magistrate & Chief Justice of India together with above mentioned accused public servants will be responsible for it. Even if
criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.

If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If
anything untoward like hit & run cases , murder attempts , unnatural deaths , etc happens to me or to my dependents or to my family
members - In such case Chief Justice of India together with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for it , in such case
the government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the
criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be recovered by
GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police officials , guilty Judges , guilty public servants & guilty
Constitutional fuctionaries.

Date : 04.11.2016

……………………Your’s sincerely ,

Place : Mysuru , India ……………………………Nagaraja M R

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTICTION
WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. OF 2016

IN THE MATTER OF:

Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi ,
Editor , SOS e Clarion of Dalit and SOS e Voice for Justice ,
# LIG2 , No 761 , HUDCO First stage,
Laxmikantanagar , Hebbal , Mysuru – 570017
Karnataka State……………………. ……………….Petitioner

Vs

Chief Justice of India and Others……………. …….Respondents

AFFIDAVIT

I, Nagaraja Mysuru Raghupathi ( NAGARAJA.M.R.) S/O Late Raghupathi M R aged about 45 years R/O #
LIG 2 , No 761, HUDCO First stage , Laxmikantanagar , Hebbal , Mysuru – 570017 , Karnataka State , do hereby solemnly affirm and
declare as under:
1. That I am the Applicant (in person) herein as also the sole Petitioner (in person) in all the accompanying Writ Petitions , PILs , RTI
Appeals , Show Cause Notice , Police complaint , Declaration and as such I am fully conversant with the facts and circumstances and
therefore competent to depose this Affidavit.
2. That the contents of all the instant applications , PILs , RTI Appeals , Show Cause Notice , Police Complaint , Declaration are true
and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
3. The Copies / Pictures of Identity proofs submitted below refers to my Identity.
4. I have digitally signed the whole file put together as one.

Nagaraja.M.R.
DEPONENT

VERIFICATION:
VERIFIED that the contents of the foregoing affidavit are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
No part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therefrom.
VERIFIED at Mysuru on this day 04th November of 2016
Nagaraja.M.R.
DEPONENT

Edited, printed , published owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ # LIG-2 No 761,HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,

OPP WATER WORKS , LAXMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL ,MYSURU – 570017 KARNATAKA INDIA
Cell : 91 8970318202
Home page :
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/sosevoiceforjustice/ , http://groups.google.co.in/group/hrwepaper / ,
http://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice / , http://evoiceofhumanrightswatch.wordpress.com / ,
http://naghrw.tripod.com/evoice/ ,
http://e-voiceofhumanrightswatch.blogspot.com ,
http://paper.li/f-1368369249 ,
Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,
http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw
A Member of Amnesty International