You are on page 1of 14



Sponsored by the American Welding Society and the Welding Research Council

All papers published in the Welding Journal's Welding Research Supplement undergo Peer Review before
publication for: 1) originality of the contribution; 2) technical value to the welding community; 3) prior
publication of the material being reviewed; 4) proper credit to others working in the same area; and 5)
justification of the conclusions, based on the work performed.
The names of the more than 170 individuals serving on the AWS Peer Review Panel are published
periodically. All are experts in specific technical areas, and all are volunteers in the program.

Heat-Affected Zone Liquation Cracking in

Austenitic and Duplex Stainless Steels
Segregation-based grain boundary liquation models are incorporated
into a mechanistic explanation of HAZ liquation cracking.


ABSTRACT. The heat-affected zone

(HAZ) liquation cracking susceptibility
of several commercial austenitic and duplex stainless steels was evaluated using
the spot Varestraint test. Test results revealed that among the austenitic stainless steels, the susceptibility to cracking
was a strong function of ferrite potential
(FP), a measure of the tendency for ferrite formation along HAZ grain boundaries adjacent to the fusion line derived
from a calculated ferrite number (FN).
Low FP heats (FP 0-1) of Type 304L were
found to be more susceptible to cracking than a Type 304 alloy with FP 8. The
HAZ liquation cracking susceptibility of
the duplex stainless steels, Ferralium 255
and Alloy 2205, was roughly equivalent
to that of the low-FP austenitic stainless
J. C. LIPPOLD is with Edison Welding Institute, Columbus, Ohio. W. A. BAESLACK III
and I. VAROL are with The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Paper presented at the 69th Annual AWS
Meeting, held April 17-22, 1988, in New
Orleans, La.

Metallographic and fractographic examination of the spot Varestraint samples revealed that cracking was characteristically intergranular in all the alloys,
but that the amount of grain boundary
liquid associated with the HAZ cracks
varied considerably. Essentially no grain
boundary liquid films could be detected
in the duplex stainless steels or the high-

HAZ Liquation Cracking
Austenitic Stainless Steel
Duplex Stainless Steel
Heat-Affected Zone
Varestraint Testing
Cracking Susceptibility
Calculated FN
Grain Boundaries
Segregation iVtechanism

FP austenitic stainless steel. Segregationbased grain boundary liquation models

are reviewed and discussed in the context of the observed cracking susceptibility.
Although the weld solidification
cracking susceptibility of austenitic
stainless steels has been studied extensively, the heat-affected zone (HAZ) l i quation cracking behavior of these alloys has received limited attention (Refs.
1-6). In addition, essentially no information exists regarding the HAZ liquation cracking susceptibility of duplex
stainless steels. The purpose of this investigation was to provide some c o m parative weldability test data for a range
of austenitic stainless steels and two duplex stainless steel alloys and to evaluate the metallurgical factors that influence HAZ liquation cracking in these alloys. In order to provide a background
for this work, a brief review of the cur1

Incoloy is a trademark of the Inco family of



rent understanding of the mechanistics

of HAZ liquation cracking is included.
HAZ Liquation Cracking
By definition, the region of the HAZ
within which liquation occurs is limited
to the partially melted zone (PMZ) and,
thus, hot cracking, or cracking resulting
from liquation, is indigenous to the PMZ
(Refs. 7, 8). Since the term hot cracking
has been generally used in the welding
literature to describe high-temperature
cracking in both the weld metal and
HAZ, its use is often ambiguous. As a
consequence, the terms weld solidification cracking and HAZ liquation cracking have been adopted here to more accurately classify weld metal and HAZ
hot cracking, respectively.
The bulk of published research devoted to HAZ liquation cracking has focused on the behavior of the austenitic
stainless steels and the nickel-based superalloys. Both alloy groups are used in
high-performance applications where
the integrity of the weld region is of critical importance and weld defects cannot generally be tolerated. Austenitic
stainless steels w h i c h have been reported to be susceptible to HAZ liquation cracking include the stabilized
grades containing titanium or niobium,
such as Type 321 (Refs. 3, 4) and Type
347 (Refs. 1, 3, 4), respectively, and
highly alloyed materials such as Incoloy'
Alloy 800 (Refs. 9-11) and A-286 (Refs.
1 1 , 12). HAZ liquation cracking has
been reported in both cast and wrought
versions of a wide variety of nickelbased alloys, including Alloy 718 (Refs.
13-15), Hastelloy X (Ref. 16), and
Udimet 700 (Ref. 1 7). These alloys have
provided the basis for many of the HAZ
liquation cracking mechanisms that
have been proposed.
Penetration Mechanism
Mechanisms used to describe HAZ liquation cracking can be divided into
t w o general categories, namely, those
that support a grain boundary penetration mechanism and those in w h i c h
grain boundary segregation is important.
The penetration mechanism for HAZ liquation cracking involves the interaction of a migrating HAZ grain boundary
with liquating matrix particles such as
carbides, sulfides, borides, etc. The metallurgical basis for this mechanism is a
phenomenon known as constitutional
liquation. Constitutional liquation was
first proposed by Savage from a strictly
theoretical standpoint in 1959. Subsequent experiments by his students (Refs.
1 8-21) proved the validity of this hypothesis.
Constitutional liquation is a nonequilibrium phenomenon associated w i t h

2-s I JANUARY 1992

the rapid heating rates experienced in

the HAZ adjacent to the fusion line. As
certain constituent particles are rapidly
heated to temperatures below the matrix solidus temperature, localized liquation occurs along the particle-matrix interface. This liquation is a consequence
of the rapid dissolution of the constituent
particle at elevated temperatures and the
resultant metallurgical reaction at the
particle/matrix interface. The amount of
liquid that forms along the interface depends on the heating rate, the dissolution kinetics of the constituent particle,
and the diffusivity of solute atoms in the
matrix. For example, if heating rates are
extremely rapid, as in the HAZ of an
electron beam or laser beam weld, particle dissolution is negligible and constitutional liquation w o u l d be m i n i mized. Conversely, if heating rates in
the H A Z are slow, as in an electroslag
w e l d , particle dissolution approaches
equilibrium conditions. Solid-state particle dissolution thus precludes the onset
of constitutional liquation. In practice,
constitutional liquation is most c o m monly observed when susceptible materials are welded using the more conventional welding processes (SMAW,
Constitutional liquation is not sufficient, a priori, to support the penetration mechanism for HAZ liquation
cracking. Since HAZ cracking is a grain
boundary phenomenon, the migration
of grain boundaries and the interaction
of these boundaries with the constituent
particles are requisites of the mechanism. (Unless, of course, constituent particles are already at grain boundary
sites.) Since grain growth is a thermally
activated process, a threshold temperature exists above which grain boundary
migration is favorable. In single-phase
materials, the locus of this temperature
generally represents the boundary of the
"true" HAZ. The rate of grain boundary
migration increases as a function of
proximity to the fusion line. In the region of the HAZ where constitutionally
liquated particles are usually observed,
grain boundaries are normally quite mobile and the likelihood of the interaction
between a boundary and particle is high.
HAZ grain boundary liquation, as defined by the penetration mechanism, requires the simultaneous occurrence of
constitutional liquation and grain
boundary migration, again assuming
that the liquating species are not already
at grain boundary sites. The penetration
of the boundary by the liquid at the particle-matrix interface either pins the
boundary or significantly slows its rate
of migration and allows uniform wetting
of the boundary by the liquid. These liquid films then serve to embrittle the HAZ
grain boundaries in the presence of sufficient mechanically and/or thermally

induced restraint imposed during the

welding process.
Many investigators have used the
penetration model to explain HAZ hot
cracking in a variety of alloys. Duvall
and Owzarski (Refs. 14, 17) observed
the constitutional liquation of MC and
M 6 C alloy carbides and related this phenomenon to HAZ embrittlement in a variety of nickel-based superalloys. Savage and Krantz (Ref. 16) associated HAZ
hot cracking in Hastelloy X with the constitutional liquation of an M 6 C carbide.
Pepe and Savage (Refs. 20, 21) concluded that HAZ grain boundary liquation in 18 Ni maraging steels was the result of the constitutional liquation of titanium sulfide particles that formed
along rolling bands in the base material.
In the family of austenitic stainless steels,
Tamura and Watanabe (Refs. 3, 4) related HAZ embrittlement in Type 347 to
the liquation of niobium carbides.
Recent studies by Thompson, ef al.
(Ref. 1 5), on Alloy 71 8 have suggested
that the thermodynamic feasibility of
constitutional liquation reactions involving Nb-rich carbides and the kinetics of
these reactions are strongly dependent
on both the composition of the surrounding austenite matrix and the weld
thermal cycle. They have also reported
that the cracking of HAZ grain boundaries in this alloy is influenced by the
temperature range over which the Nbrich, grain boundary liquid solidifies
during the on-cooling portion of the
weld thermal cycle and compositionand temperature-dependent distribution
of the liquid along the boundaries.
Segregation Mechanism
Despite the utility of the grain boundary penetration mechanism, HAZ liquation cracking is often encountered in materials where constitutional liquation
does not, or cannot, occur. (For example, in materials that do not contain intermetallic constituents.) As a result, a
liquation mechanism has evolved that
is not dependent on the interaction of a
mobile grain boundary w i t h a liquated
constituent particle. Many single-phase
materials that are relatively free of intermetallic and constituent particles have
exhibited susceptibility to HAZ liquation cracking. In general, the location of
embrittled grain boundaries in the HAZ
of these materials is nearly identical to
that of materials w h i c h are embrittled
by the penetration mechanism. As a result, a grain boundary segregation model
that rationalizes the onset of grain
boundary liquation in the absence of
constituent particle melting is often proposed to explain HAZ liquation cracking.
The segregation model in its simplest
form provides for solute/impurity ele-

ment segregation to grain boundaries,

thereby reducing the melting temperature of the boundary relative to the surrounding matrix. Above a critical temperature during the HAZ thermal cycle,
preferential melting occurs along these
boundaries effectively embrittling a narrow region of the HAZ adjacent to the
weld fusion zone. The actual mechanism by w h i c h solute/impurity atoms
segregate to the HAZ grain boundaries
is not clear.
A possible mechanism for grain
boundary segregation invokes equilibrium diffusion, where the segregated region is localized within a few atom diameters on either side of the boundary.
This type of grain boundary segregation
is driven by the free energy difference
between a solute or impurity atom in a
matrix site vs. a grain boundary site.
Since the defect structure (in terms of
atomic misfit and dislocations) in a grain
boundary is greater than that in the adjacent matrix, a reduction in the local
free energy can be achieved by diffusion
of the atom to the boundary site. This
segregation is further enhanced when
the solute/impurity element is highly surface active and/or exhibits a low solubility in the base metal. In many of the
high-performance structural steels and
stainless steels, elements such as sulfur,
phosphorus, carbon, antimony, tin and
arsenic exhibit this behavior. The behavior of an individual element, however, is a strong function of the base
metal composition, metallurgical condition (annealed, heat treated, cold
worked, etc.) and thermal history.
An equilibrium grain boundary segregation model is most tractable when
one assumes that atomic rearrangement
occurs at a static boundary. In the HAZ
of a typical fusion w e l d , grain growth
begins above a threshold temperature
during the on-heating portion of the thermal cycle and continues up to the local
peak temperature. Under these conditions, grain boundary liquation due to
equilibrium segregation then occurs
once boundary motion has essentially
stopped during the on-cooling portion
of the thermal cycle. The HAZ embrittlement window, via this mechanism, is
thus quite narrow since the grain boundary velocity must go to zero at a temperature that is sufficient to promote melting along the boundary. From a strictly
theoretical basis, grain boundary liquation due to equilibrium segregation
would be enhanced by moderate to slow
HAZ heating and cooling rates. For the
austenitic stainless steels, this is, in fact,
what is normally observed; HAZ cracking is almost never observed in electron
beam welds or low heat input arc welding processes.
Alternatively, it has been argued that

boundary sweeping in simulated HAZ

microstructures in Alloy 800. Using analytical electron microscopy (AEM) techniques, no clear evidence for grain
boundary enrichment via a sweeping
mechanism could be detected in samples heated into the liquation temperature range and then quenched in-situ.
Instead, a microconstitutional liquation
mechanism was detected whereby submicron Ti(C,N) particles react with the
surrounding matrix and liquate. This liquation resulted in localized wetting of
the grain boundaries and a subsequent
loss in ductility, hence producing a crack
susceptible microstructure.
Another mechanism for HAZ grain
boundary segregation is described by
the pipeline diffusion theory. Since weld
solidification occurs via an epitaxial nucleation process, grain boundaries are
continuous from the fusion zone across
the fusion boundary into the HAZ. By
the nature of the solidification process,
partitioning of solute and impurity elements along the solidification grain
boundary results in solute/impurity enrichment relative to the adjacent, epitaxial HAZ boundary. This boundary
provides a diffusion pipeline for elemental segregation and subsequent enrichment of HAZ grain boundaries. Since
the rate of diffusion along grain boundaries is greatly accelerated relative to
bulk diffusion (Ref. 24), this mechanism
provides a plausible explanation for
grain boundary liquation adjacent to the
fusion boundary.
The mere occurrence of a liquation
reaction, either by constitutional or
boundary segregation-induced liquation, is not sufficient to produce a cracksusceptible microstructure. In order to
embrittle the microstructure, it is essential that the liquid species penetrate and
wet the boundary. If wetting is ineffective, liquid will exist in isolated pockets

equilibrium segregation to grain boundaries is not sufficient to support liquation in the HAZ since the segregation
field is extremely localized. As a result,
a boundary sweeping mechanism has
been described (Refs. 3, 6, 10). As grain
boundaries migrate upon heating above
the threshold grain growth temperature,
solute and/or impurity atoms are swept
into the boundaries and are dragged
along as grain growth proceeds. Again,
elements that are surface active and/or
exhibit a low solubility in the matrix
w o u l d have the highest probability of
being swept into and assimilated w i t h
the boundary. As the temperature in the
HAZ increases above the local grain
boundary melting temperature, liquation occurs and the region of the HAZ
within a critical embrittlement temperature range becomes susceptible to liquation cracking.
Duvall and Owzarski (Ref. 22) have
argued that grain boundary migration
actually results in boundary breakaway
from solute atmospheres and that the instantaneous composition of the mobile
boundary reflects the local composition
of the matrix through w h i c h it is moving. They provided metallographic evidence for this argument by showing
"ghost" grain boundaries in the HAZ at
the sites where breakaway occurred during initial boundary migration. Lippold
(Ref. 10) pointed out, however, that
while some solute elements are not mobile enough to migrate with the boundary, others are extremely mobile and
may either move with the original
boundary or be swept from the matrix
as the boundary migrates. Thus, larger,
slow-diffusing atoms remain behind to
form ghost boundaries while surface-active, fast-diffusing elements w i l l move
with the boundary.
More recently, Romig, etal. (Ref. 23),
has investigated the potential for grain

Table 1Chemical Composition of Duplex and Austenitic Stainless Steels (wt-%)
Ferralium 255

Alloy 2205





Base Metal FN (1)

Potential, FP (2)









M A286









(a) Measured using the vlagne Gage.

(b) Calculated FN f r o m the WRC-88 diagram (Ref. 25).








Table 2Spot Varestraint Test Conditions

15.25 c m Cracks





2.5 cm

Spot w e l d
Top V i e w
GTAW torch




Die block

Side View

Alloy 2205
Ferralium 255
Type 304
Type 304L-1
Type 304L-2
Modified A286

Current Voltage


Weld Pool

Process: C T A W , DCEN.
Electrode: W - 2 % T h 0 2 , 30-deg angle, 2.38-mm diameter.
Torch gas f l o w rate: 30 cfh
W e l d time: 20 s
Ram delay time: 0 - 5 ms.

austenitic stainless steel alloys was

based on their ferrite potential (FP). In
this paper, the term FP is used to define
the tendency for ferrite to form in the
HAZ of austenitic and duplex stainless
steels and is determined using WRC-88
equivalents (Ref. 25). Thus, the FP represents a calculated FN but is not intended to predict the amount of ferrite
that forms in the HAZ, i.e., it serves as
an index for the potential for solid-state
ferrite formation in the HAZ. Base metal
FN and FP for the austenitic and duplex
alloys are listed in Table 1. FN values
were determined using a Magne Gage,
calibrated according to AWS procedure
Spot Varestraint Testing


Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of the spot Varestraint test.

allowing substantial solid-solid contact
along the grain boundaries. As wetting
becomes more effective, boundaries will
be uniformly coated with a thin liquid
f i l m . The wetting characteristics are a
function of the composition of liquid and
solid in contact, the crystal structure, or
structures, of the solid substrate, the relative surface free energies and the temperature. It is frequently reported that
like boundaries (for example, austeniteaustenite, ferrite-ferrite) wet much more
effectively than two-phase boundaries.
Based on this contention, Kujanpaa, ef
al. (Ref. 6), postulated that the presence
of a small amount of ferrite along austenite grain boundaries in the HAZ of an
austenitic stainless steel is effective in
reducing susceptibility to cracking relative to HAZ microstructures that were
fully austenitic. No clear metallurgical
evidence of this phenomena has been
This investigation evaluates the HAZ
liquation cracking susceptibility of three
types of stainless steels as distinguished
by their high-temperature HAZ m i -

4-s I J A N U A R Y 1992

crostructures, namely, fully ferritic, d u plex

austenitic. HAZ cracking susceptibility
.among these alloys will be discussed in
the context of the liquation mechanisms
described above.
Experimental Procedure
Four austenitic and two duplex stainless steel alloys were evaluated during
this investigation. The austenitic stainless steels were selected to represent a
broad range of alloy compositions and
liquation cracking behavior and included Type 304, two heats of Type
304L and a modified A286 alloy. The
two duplex stainless steels, Ferralium
255 and Alloy 2205, represent alloys
that have experienced widespread commercial use. All materials were obtained
in wrought form (bar or plate) in the solution-annealed condition. The chemical compositions of these alloys are
listed in Table 1. The selection of

The spot Varestraint test (Ref. 26) was

used to evaluate the HAZ liquation
cracking susceptibility of the austenitic
and duplex stainless steels. A schematic
illustration of the spot Varestraint apparatus is provided in Fig. 1. Laboratoryscale samples 1 5.25 X 2.54 X 0.64 cm
(6.0 X 1.0 X 0.25 in.) are clamped into
the test fixture, as indicated in Fig. 1. A
gas tungsten arc (GTA) spot weld is initiated, and after a preselected time, a
pneumatically actuated ram is triggered,
forcing the sample to conform to the radius of a die block. The augmented tangential strain imparted to the surface of
the test specimen is equal to approximately t/2R, where t is the specimen
thickness and R is the radius of the die
block. Augmented strains in the range
from 0.25 to 7% can be achieved by selection of the appropriate die block.
The test conditions used during this
investigation are listed in Table 2. In an
effort to maintain a relatively uniform
weld pool size, a variety of welding parameters were employed for these materials in order to compensate for differences in penetration characteristics. Despite these efforts, only a 9.0-mm-diameter ( 0.35-in.) pool could be produced
in the modified A286 alloy. At higher

heat inputs in this alloy, full penetration

of the specimen occurred and the weld
pool could not be maintained. An arc
time of 20 s was used to produce a relatively shallow temperature gradient in
the HAZ surrounding the molten pool,
thereby providing a more extensive m i crostructural region conducive to HAZ
The delay time between arc extinction and actual specimen/die block contact is perhaps the most critical parameter in the spot Varestraint test. Since
weld pool solidification begins at the instant of arc extinction, long delay times
allow significant solidification, w h i c h
may promote cracking in the fusion zone
rather than the HAZ. Selection of the appropriate delay time is particularly critical in materials that are relatively resistant to HAZ liquation cracking. For this
reason, extremely short delay times, on
the order of 0 to 5 ms, were selected to
insure cracking was concentrated in the
All samples were tested at a single
augmented strain level of 5%. This level
was required to insure cracking in all
the alloys tested. The 1 5.25-cm (6-in.)
dimension of the samples was parallel
to the rolling direction, thus resulting in
crack propagation perpendicular to the
rolling direction. Alloy 2205 was also
tested in the transverse orientation.
Following testing, HAZ cracks were
measured on the as-tested surface at 40X
magnification using a binocular microscope equipped with a filar eyepiece.
Individual crack lengths were measured
and results for each specimen reported
in terms of number of cracks, total crack
length, maximum crack length and average crack length.

^k&\ >,; J

-v ^ * "TO- _N* ^ ^ S q j f e s S g y p b ^ ^ ^ ^




W-I.-3 .wfr

Microstructural Evaluation
Metallographic samples from representative spot Varestraint specimens
(plan view) for each alloy were prepared
in order to evaluate the microstructural
features of the HAZ and relate these features to cracking susceptibility. All samples were polished through 0.05 micron
alumina and initially etched using a
mixed acid solution containing equal
parts of hydrochloric, acetic and nitric
acids. In addition, several color-etching
techniques were used in conjunction
with the duplex stainless steels. These
included: 1) a modified Murakami's
technique (Ref. 27), 2) an iron colloid
technique (Refs. 28, 29), and 3) a twostage electrolytic technique using a 10%
oxalic acid etch followed by a 2 0 %
potassium hydroxide etch.
Regions of the spot Varestraint samples containing cracks were examined
using an optical metallograph at magni-

F/g. 2 Representative base metal microstructures. A Type 304/304L; B modified A286; C duplex stainless steel (Alloy 2205). 400X.


Spot-Varestraint Test Results

at 5% Augmented Strain


Spot Varestraint Test Results


m a k e s g r a i n size m e a s u r e m e n t d i f f i c u l t
a n d d o e s n o t a l l o w for r e a d y c o m p a r i son w i t h the austenitic stainless steels.



1 2

o> 9













Fig. 3 Spot Varestraint test results in terms of total crack length and maximum
length at 5% strain.
f i c a t i o n s up t o 5 0 0 X . These regions w e r e
also e x a m i n e d at h i g h m a g n i f i c a t i o n in
a s c a n n i n g e l e c t r o n m i c r o s c o p e (SEM)
e q u i p p e d w i t h an e n e r g y - d i s p e r s i v e
s p e c t r o m e t e r (EDS) f o r m i c r o c h e m i c a l
analysis. Selected samples w e r e also
c a r e f u l l y sectioned a n d fractured in
o r d e r to e x p o s e the l i q u a t i o n c r a c k fracture surfaces for subsequent e x a m i n a t i o n in t h e SEM.
Base Metal Microstructure
The m o d i f i e d A 2 8 6 alloy and o n e
heat o f T y p e 3 0 4 L , d e s i g n a t e d 3 0 4 L - 2 ,
w e r e f u l l y a u s t e n i t i c w i t h g r a i n sizes in
the range of A S T M 4 - 6 . The other heat
of Type 304L, designated 3 0 4 L - 1 , and

^ 0




the Type 304 alloy contained ferrite

stringers o r i e n t e d p a r a l l e l t o t h e r o l l i n g
d i r e c t i o n . T h e l e v e l of f e r r i t e as m e a s u r e d u s i n g t h e M a g n e G a g e w a s less
than FN 1 .
Color metallographic techniques all o w e d a clear distinction between the
ferrite a n d austenite in the d u p l e x stainless steels Fig. 2 . S i n c e h o t w o r k i n g
of d u p l e x stainless steel is n o r m a l l y perf o r m e d in t h e a u s t e n i t e - f e r r i t e , t w o phase r e g i o n , the resultant m i c r o s t r u c t u r e t e n d s to be s t r o n g l y o r i e n t e d a l o n g
the w o r k i n g d i r e c t i o n . W o r k i n g a n d a n n e a l i n g in the t w o - p h a s e region also
a l l o w g o o d c o n t r o l of the ferrite/austenite b a l a n c e w i t h t h e f i n a l p r o d u c t g e n erally tailored to c o n t a i n nearly equal
p r o p o r t i o n s o f these phases. T h e h i g h l y
d i r e c t i o n a l nature o f the m i c r o s t r u c t u r e


A bar chart illustrating average v a l ues o f b o t h t o t a l c r a c k length (TCL) a n d

m a x i m u m c r a c k length (MCL) at an a u g m e n t e d s t r a i n l e v e l o f 5 % is s h o w n i n
Fig. 3. N o t e t h a t A l l o y 2 2 0 5 w a s tested
both l o n g i t u d i n a l and transverse to the
rolling direction. All the other alloys
w e r e tested w i t h the s p e c i m e n axis l o n g i t u d i n a l l y o r i e n t e d to t h e r o l l i n g d i r e c t i o n . In t h i s o r i e n t a t i o n , c r a c k s w h i c h
form on the periphery of the w e l d pool
d u r i n g testing w i l l t e n d to p r o p a g a t e norm a l , o r at an a n g l e n e a r l y n o r m a l , t o the
r o l l i n g d i r e c t i o n . In m a t e r i a l s t h a t e x h i b i t c o m p o s i t i o n a l b a n d i n g , this o r i e n t a t i o n s h o u l d r e d u c e the o v e r a l l level of
c r a c k i n g relative to crack propagation
parallel t o the b a n d e d structure.
T h e m o s t c r a c k resistant o f the a l l o y s
tested w a s T y p e 3 0 4 . T h e b e h a v i o r of
t h e d u p l e x s t a i n l e s s steels w a s n e a r l y
identical and essentially equivalent to
the t w o heats of T y p e 3 0 4 L . N o t surprisingly, the modified A 2 8 6 alloy exhibited t h e largest s u s c e p t i b i l i t y t o H A Z l i quation cracking. W i t h the exception of
A l l o y 3 0 4 L - 1 , M C L a n d T C L s e r v e d as
e q u i v a l e n t measures of c r a c k i n g suscept i b i l i t y for these materials. N o t e that
s p e c i m e n o r i e n t a t i o n w i t h respect to
r o l l i n g d i r e c t i o n had little effect on
c r a c k i n g susceptibility in A l l o y 2 2 0 5 .
T h i s is p r o b a b l y t h e r e s u l t o f t h e c o m plete t r a n s f o r m a t i o n of the d u p l e x struct u r e t o ferrite in the H A Z a d j a c e n t to the
w e l d fusion boundary. This transformat i o n e f f e c t i v e l y e l i m i n a t e s a n y phase o r i e n t a t i o n residual f r o m t h e base m a t e r i a l .


i 55

200 pm

5 0 Aim

Fig. 4 HAZ cracking in Type 304 spot Varestraint sample. A SOX; B 400X. Arrows indicate ferrite along austenite grain

6-s I JANUARY 1992




9 * \

50 Mm






| j

Fig. 5 HAZ cracking in Type 304L (FP 1) spot Varestraint sample. A 50X, arrows indicate the fusion boundary; B 400X, arrows point out
crack blunting at ferrite stringers.
curred along an epitaxial solidification
grain boundary in the fusion zone.
A spot Varestraint sample of Type
304L with FP 1 (304L-1) is shown in Fig.
5. Cracking in this sample is again restricted primarily to the HAZ. The adjacent fusion zone solidified as primary
austenite and exhibits scattered ferrite
along solidification subgrain boundaries. Cracks in this alloy often took on
an irregular, stair-step appearance as
dictated by the presence of ferrite
stringers in the HAZ. Note that the crack
in the right-hand portion of Fig. 5A exhibits a distinct step. This stepwise propagation is more clearly seen in Fig. 5B.
The ferrite stringers, w h i c h are nearly
perpendicular to the austenite grain
boundaries at this location, act to arrest
the crack along one grain boundary and
transfer cracking to an adjacent boundary on the opposite side of the stringer.
Ferrite was not observed along austenite grain boundaries in the HAZ of this

Optical Microscopy
Austenitic Stainless Steels. Metallographic sections revealing the top surface (plan view) of the spot Varestraint
samples were prepared in order to determine the location and nature of HAZ
cracking. The microstructure near the
fusion boundary of a Type 304 sample
is shown in Fig. 4. The fusion zone consists of a two-phase mixture of austenite
and ferrite with a ferrite level of FN 8.
Note that the crack shown in Fig. 4A is
restricted to the HAZ with essentially no
penetration into the fusion zone. This is
a consequence of both the short delay
time employed during the test and the
high inherent resistance of the fusion
zone to weld solidification cracking. At
higher magnification (Fig. 4B), ferrite is
observed along austenite grain boundaries in the HAZ adjacent to the fusion
boundary. The ferrite is present as a thin
layer at these boundaries and extends
only 1 to 2 grain diameters away from
the fusion boundary. Also note in this
photomicrograph that cracking has oc-

The microstructure adjacent to the

fusion boundary of a Type 304L, FP 0




spot Varestraint sample is shown in Fig.

6. Again, cracking is restricted to the
HAZ and is associated w i t h austenite
grain boundaries. At higher magnification (Fig. 6B), cracking is observed to
occur along a wide, diffuse boundary.
This boundary spreading is due to localized melting in close p r o x i m i t y to
the fusion boundary. Note that adjacent grain boundaries do not appear
to exhibit localized melting.
The HAZ microstructure of modified
A286 spot Varestraint samples was dramatically different from the other
austenitic stainless steels. As shown in
Fig. 7, cracks do not initiate at the f u sion boundary but, rather, are separated from the fusion boundary by a
partially melted zone (PMZ). This PMZ
exhibits extensive liquation both
inter and i n t r a g r a n u l a r l y . The large
a m o u n t of l i q u i d a v a i l a b l e in the
PMZ acts to e f f e c t i v e l y heal any
cracks that f o r m in this r e g i o n . This
healing effect is apparent at the crack
tip shown in Fig. 7B. HAZ grain boundary liquation was extensive in the


: ' ; v ^ \ f f i



.* y*

' '

, . ! ' : , ; . ; . T / > > . . . -!.-.--,

\ '

> \

I 200 Mm

J ^ /^u


. . - ' - '



50 /urn

Fig. 6 HAZ cracking in Type 304L (FP 0) spot Varestraint sample,A 50X, arrows indicate the fusion boundary; B 400X, arrows show a
widened, liquated grain boundary.


modified A 2 8 6 alloy up to 10 to 20
grain diameters from the fusion boundary (nearly 1 mm). The extent of liquation correlated well with the maximum
crack length measured on the sample
surface and the high overall crack susceptibility as determined by total crack
length Fig. 3.
Duplex Stainless Steels
HAZ liquation cracking in the duplex
stainless steels was restricted to a narrow region adjacent to the fusion boundary. Again, precise control of the ram
delay time was critical for restricting
cracking to the HAZ. Color metallographic techniques were used to reveal
the nature of cracking in the Ferralium
255 HAZ, as shown in Fig. 8. The twostage electrolytic technique (Fig. 8A) was
helpful in revealing both the fusion
boundary and the intergranular nature
of the HAZ cracks. Note that significant
microstructural modification has occurred in the H A Z relative to the base
material Fig. 2. At peak temperatures,
the microstructure adjacent to the HAZ
transforms almost entirely to ferrite. Oncooling, austenite precipitates both inter
and intragranularly, but the structure remains primarily ferritic. At higher magnification and using a colloidal iron
technique (Fig. 8B), a crack at the edge
of the fusion boundary is shown to coincide w i t h austenite along the ferrite
grain boundary. Close inspection of this
photomicrograph reveals that austenite
is present on opposing sides of the crack,
indicating that cracking does not occur
along the ferrite/austenite interface.
Rather, the austenite forms on-cooling
on the crack surfaces.
HAZ cracking in an Alloy 2205 spot
Varestraint specimen is illustrated in Fig.
9. Similar to Ferralium 255, transformation to ferrite HAZ occurred adjacent to

the fusion boundary with subsequent

precipitation of austenite on-cooling. In
general, the transformation region in the
Alloy 2205 HAZ was narrower than that
in Ferralium 255. A l l cracks were restricted to this transformation region and
extended only 1- to 2-grain diameters
away from the fusion boundary. At high
magnification (Fig. 9B), the coincidence
of HAZ cracks and grain boundary
austenite is again apparent with austenite appearing to precipitate on the crack
The fracture surfaces of H A Z liquation cracks from Alloy 2205, Ferralium
255 and Type 304L (FP 0) spot Varestraint samples were examined in the
SEM to evaluate differences in cracking
behavior. Type 304 specimens were not
examined due to difficulties in obtaining
adequate samples. Cracks in this alloy
were extremely small and could not be
successfully isolated for sectioning. The
surface of liquation cracks sectioned
from welds in the duplex stainless steels
are shown in Fig. 10. The morphology
was clearly intergranular and relatively
smooth, consistent with the presence of
extremely thin liquid films. There is also
evidence of austenite precipitation, thus
corroborating the metallographic observations. In contrast, HAZ liquation crack
surfaces in the Type 304L (FP 0) specimen (Fig. 11) exhibited a more irregular,
nearly dendritic appearance, indicative
of a greater quantity of liquid along the
boundary prior to cracking.

The results obtained during this investigation have provided a quantitative
measure of HAZ liquation cracking in
duplex stainless steels relative to

austenitic stainless steels of variable ferrite potential (FP). In addition, the metallurgical evaluation of the spot Varestraint samples used to generate these
data has provided some insight into the
mechanisms of HAZ liquation cracking
in both duplex and austenitic stainless
Relative Cracking Susceptibility
The use of simulative weldability
tests, such as the spot Varestraint test,
facilitates the assessment of weld cracking susceptibility in engineering alloys.
The test is appealing in that it provides
a quantitative measure of susceptibility
that can be readily compared to other
materials tested under the same, or similar test conditions. Some caution must
be exercised in the evaluation of test results, however, since the conditions
under which the materials are tested vary
significantly from those experienced
during actual welding fabrication. Thus,
the absolute value of TCL or MCL, as reported in Fig. 3, has little practical significance. Rather, spot Varestraint testing provides a good relative measure of
HAZ liquation cracking susceptibility.
In general, the HAZ cracking susceptibility of austenitic stainless steels as determined by the spot Varestraint test has
correlated well with actual fabrication
behavior. (Ref. 30)
Based on the results of spot Varestraint tests, the HAZ liquation cracking
susceptibility of duplex stainless steels
can be expected to be intermediate between austenitic alloys with a FP greater
than 3 and those with FP 0. In practice,
austenitic stainless steels of the former
type are extremely resistant to HAZ liquation cracking. Even under the extreme restraint conditions imposed in
the Varestraint test, the extent of cracking is severely limited in these alloys;



v- -**v


*\ if


r '. Ik- ,".., <_.i./__.-?;

200 Mm

50 pm



Fig. 7 HAZ cracking in modified A286 spot Varestraint sample. A SOX, arrows indicate fusion boundary; B 400X, arrows demarcate a
backfilled region at the crack.

8-s I J A N U A R Y 1 9 9 2


H'g. 8 H A Z cracks in a Ferralium 255 spot Varestraint sample. A WOX, two-stage electrolytic
ary; B 400X, iron colloid technique, arrows point out austenite on opposing crack faces.

etch, arrows indicate the fusion


it 8 1

t- HI



3_B '


F/g. 9 H A Z cracking in SAF 2205 spot Varestraint sample. A 50X, arrows indicate the fusion boundary; B 400X.


Pig, 70 Fracture surface morphology of HAZ liquation cracks in duplex stainless steels. A Ferralium 255; B Alloy 2205. 500X.

essentially no cracking occurs until augmented strains exceed 2 % (Ref. 30). In

contrast, austenitic stainless steels with
FP 0 have been problematic with respect
to HAZ liquation cracking particularly
in alloys containing Ti, Nb, or high levels of C, S, P and B. (Refs. 1 -6). Numerous instances of cracking during fabrication have been reported in a variety
of product forms and conditions. Under
Varestraint testing conditions, alloys
with FP 0 exhibit HAZ liquation cracks
at even the lowest levels of augmented
strain, i.e., 0.25% (Ref. 30).
In practice, few instances of HAZ liquation cracking in duplex stainless
steels have been reported. This is partially due to the somewhat restricted use
of these materials, particularly in applications where restraint levels are ex-

treme, and to the generally low i m p u rity levels that are maintained in these
alloys. Based on the Varestraint data
generated during this investigation, it is
likely that these steels will exhibit a good
overall resistance to HAZ liquation
cracking under low to moderate restraint
conditions. As weld restraint becomes
more severe or if material composition
is not carefully controlled to minimize
impurities, cracking in these alloys may,
in fact, be significant.
Cracking Mechanisms
In stainless steels, the factors that influence HAZ liquation cracking can be
identified and categorized as either compositional or microstructural in nature.
Compositional factors include the ferrite

potential (FP) and impurity content while

microstructural effects include grain size,
nature and distribution of precipitates
and second phases, and base material
homogeneity. The complex thermal-mechanical history of the HAZ and an inadequate understanding of metallurgical
behavior at temperatures in the vicinity
of the material solidus complicate the
definition of a precise mechanism for
HAZ liquation cracking. These issues will
be discussed in the following sections in
the context of the microstructural observations reported previously.
Penetration Mechanism
Of the alloys evaluated during this investigation, only modified A286 exhibited apparent constitutional liquation

Fig. 7 7 Fracture surface morphology of an HAZ liquation crack in Type 304L (FP 0). A 500X; B 7500X.

10-s I J A N U A R Y 1992

and subsequent grain boundary penetration. As is evident in Fig. 7, the constitutional liquation of Ti-rich carbides
(Ref. 12) provides a large quantity of liquid for grain boundary penetration and
wetting. In the vicinity of the fusion line,
essentially all the grain boundaries show
evidence of liquid and at higher magnification a second-phase, identified as a
Laves phase (Ref. 12), forms upon resolidification of the boundary on-cooling.
It is significant that this highly liquated
region of the H A Z does not exhibit
cracking. It is proposed that this immunity is the result of crack healing by excess grain boundary liquid and backfilling of liquid from the adjacent weld
pool. This healing effect is particularly
apparent at the tip of the crack shown
in Fig. 7B.
Perhaps the most interesting observation from Fig. 7A is that cracking is most
prevalent in the region of the HAZ
slightly removed from the fusion line
where only partial grain boundary liquation is evident. This behavior is not
unique to modified A286 and has been
reported previously for Incoloy Alloys
903 and 909 (Refs. 3 1 , 32) and Alloy
718 (Ref. 15). There are several possible explanations for this behavior.
1) The crack-susceptible region is sufficiently remote from the weld pool that
significant liquid backfilling of cracks is
not possible.
2) Grain boundary liquation occurs
on a more localized scale than is apparent with optical microscopy and, in fact,
all the boundaries are liquated.
3) Liquation, and subsequent cracking, only occurs along boundaries that
have intersected a constitutionally l i quated particle.
4) Localized grain boundary strains
are much higher in this region than in
the mushy zone adjacent to the fusion
5) Crack initiation may occur in the
heavily constitutionally liquated region
with propagation proceeding along
nonliquated boundaries via a l i q u i d metal embrittlement mechanism.
Despite the considerable study that
has been devoted to alloys that are susceptible to cracking via a constitutional
liquation/grain boundary penetration
mechanism, many of the significant aspects of this mechanism remain a mystery. It is apparent, however, that the
constitutional liquation of intermetallic
constituents is an essential component
of the cracking in the modified A286
alloy evaluated in this study and in many
other engineering alloys reported in the
literature. Development of a more precise description of the penetration mechanism of HAZ liquation cracking requires a more thorough treatment of the
issues enumerated above.

Segregation Mechanism
H A Z liquation cracking in the absence of a liquating particle relies on a
mechanism whereby grain boundary
melting is promoted by a localized variation in composition relative to the surrounding matrix. This variation is driven
by segregation of solute and impurity elements at high temperature. Several concepts commonly used to rationalize such
a mechanism were reviewed in the introduction. In this study, metallographic
and fractographic observations suggest
that HAZ liquation cracking in both the
duplex and 300-series stainless steels
occurs by a segregation mechanism.
This is supported by the fact that no liquating particles were observed in the
HAZ and the liquid films along HAZ
grain boundaries in the spot Varestraint
samples were either extremely thin (Figs.
5B and 6B) or essentially undetectable
Figs. 4B and 12.
Previously, Kujanpaa, etal. (Ref. 6),
noted the relationship between weld ferrite content and HAZ liquation cracking. The rationale was that ferrite along
HAZ grain boundaries inhibits wetting
by liquid films and limits diffusion of impurity elements. Another important effect of ferrite formation along austenite
grain boundaries is the restriction of
grain growth. This effect is apparent
when comparing Type 304 (FP 8) and
Type 304L (FP 0) Figs. 4A and 6A.
The onset of ferrite precipitation at
the austenite grain boundaries tends to
anchor those boundaries, preventingfurther growth and producing a relatively
fine-grained region at the fusion bound-

ary. The inverse relationship between

grain size and cracking susceptibility has
been demonstrated previously (Refs. 13,
1 5, 33) and may be rationalized based
on both a strain accommodation and liquid distribution argument. As the grain
boundary area increases (smaller grain
size), the fraction of the total strain accommodated by a single boundary decreases. Below some critical level of
strain the boundary will not crack, where
this level is determined by the nature of
the boundary with regard to metallurgical character and orientation. In addition, as grain size decreases for a fixed
volume percent of liquid, the boundary
liquid film becomes much thinnerordiscontinuous, both of which increase resistance to cracking.
The extent of ferrite precipitation is a
function of the ferrite potential. As it increases above approximately FP 3, the
tendency for ferrite formation increases
with a progressive decrease in the initial precipitation temperature, as dictated by the phase diagram. Ferrite formation at lower temperatures w o u l d
have a more potent effect on restriction
of grain growth. At high levels (greater
than FP 20), the HAZ becomes fully ferritic and approximates the situation encountered w i t h the duplex stainless
steels. Thus, austenitic stainless steels in
the composition range from FP 3-20
would be expected to be more resistant
to HAZ liquation crack formation than
steels with FP 0 based solely on a grain
size effect. It is likely, however, that
other factors are involved.
Another important consideration relates to the boundary affinity for solute

"- *':$&

50 M-m
Fig. 12 Representative HAZ liquation crack in a duplex stainless steel (Ferralium 255). Note
the austenite that has precipitated along the grain boundary on-cooling from the crack- susceptible temperature range. 400X


Grain Boundary Sweeping

Dissolution of second phases

and intermetallics on-heating

. s

s S////A


Grain boundary migration

^^n\\\\\\\\\%^Assimilation of melting point

depressant elements

Boundary melting

Fig. 13 Schematic illustration of grain boundary sweeping in the weld heat-affected zone.

Pipeline Diffusion from the Fusion Zone

S-L Interface

Partitioning during weld


Diffusion along epitaxial

boundary "pipeline"

Boundary melting

Fig, 14 Schematic illustration of pipeline diffusion from the fusion zone to weld heataffected zone.

12-s I J A N U A R Y 1 9 9 2

and/or impurity atoms and, subsequently, the nature of liquid films that
may form along these boundaries. The
difference in wetting characteristics between austenite-austenite and austenite-ferrite boundaries is often quoted as
a major factor influencing liquation
cracking of stainless steels and has been
used by Kujanpaa ,etal., (Ref. 6) in his
rationale for the effect of ferrite potential on cracking susceptibility. Although
this hypothesis can be supported on a
strictly theoretical basis (Ref. 34), there
is no experimental evidence of w h i c h
the authors are aware that supports this
contention. This may, in part, be the reason for its popularity. It is possible that
other aspects of the grain boundary, such
as diffusivity, trapping potential for solute/impurities, orientation and m o b i l ity, are far more important than boundary wetting characteristics.
It is interesting to note, when examining the HAZ microstructures of the alloys tested in this study, that no evidence
of liquid films can be found in Type 304
(FP 8) and the duplex stainless steels
(Figs. 4B, 10 and 12). (In the duplex
stainless steels, direct observation may
be somewhat obscured by the precipitation of grain boundary austenite.) If the
boundary wetting theory alone was invoked, then some liquid should be observed, perhaps as discrete pockets
rather than as a boundary f i l m . In the
absence of this, it is reasonable to conclude that the volume of liquid that
forms along ferrite-austenite and ferriteferrite boundaries is probably far less
than that at austenite-austenite boundaries given equivalent levels of impurities. Thus, the issues of boundary diffusion, affinity, orientation and mobility
would seem to be equally important aspects of the mechanism for HAZ liquation cracking in these alloys.
Grain boundary segregation driven
by boundary mobility or sweeping offers a possible explanation for HAZ grain
boundary liquation. This phenomenon,
illustrated schematically in Fig. 13, is
supported by the fundamental work of
Kasen (Ref. 35), and Hillert and Purdy
(Ref. 24). They have shown that segregation to moving boundaries may be
several orders of magnitude greater than
attributable to equilibrium behavior and
that diffusion within the moving boundary is considerably greater than that
along a static boundary. The latter point
is also supported by the work of Smidoda, ef al. (Ref. 36), who showed that
the difference in diffusivity between migrating and static boundaries in aluminum was almost four orders of magnitude at temperatures near the solidus.
In the weld HAZ, the extent of grain
boundary mobility is primarily dependent on the distribution of intermetallic

and second phases and the metallurgical nature of the base material. In stainless steels, most base materials are provided in the solution-annealed condition, but may contain various carbides,
nitrides, sulfides, etc. As these particles
dissolve at temperatures approaching
the alloy solidus, grain growth occurs
and the remnant solute/impurity elements from the dissolution may be swept
into the boundary. Rapid boundary diffusion insures that the boundary concentration equilibrates. As this concentration exceeds some critical level in its
instantaneous temperature field, boundary melting will occur as depicted in Fig.
Coupled to this treatment of grain
boundary segregation is the pipeline diffusion theory, as illustrated in Fig. 14.
Due to the epitaxial nature of weld solidification, grain boundaries in the HAZ
are contiguous with solidification grain
boundaries in the fusion zone. As a consequence of solute partitioning during
solidification in concert w i t h rapid
boundary diffusion, solute and impurity
elements can be rapidly transported
down the boundary pipeline into the adjacent HAZ. Thus, elements such as sulfur, phosphorus, boron, titanium, silicon and niobium, which are known to
partition to the solidification boundaries
of austenitic stainless steels, may rapidly
diffuse into the adjacent HAZ grain
It is suggested that this mechanism is
not an alternative to the boundary
sweeping mechanism, but rather that the
two operate coincidental ly.
The existence of this grain-boundary
pipeline, thus, allows rapid transport of
weld metal impurities to the HAZ grain
boundaries and may explain the cracking of relatively clean base metals
welded with filler metals of higher impurity content. The local equilibration
of grain boundary composition via rapid
diffusion may also explain why HAZ
cracks are often observed to propagate
into the fusion zone, or, conversely, how
fusion zone cracks span the fusion
boundary, terminating in the HAZ. An
example of this behavior in the current
study is shown in Fig. 1 5.
Another, often overlooked, effect is
that of boundary orientation. In examining spot Varestraint samples of the FP
1 and FP 0 austenitic stainless steels, it
is immediately apparent that only a small
fraction of the boundaries exhibit liquation and only some fraction of these are
cracked. Thus, it seems likely that
boundary orientation plays some role in
the liquation phenomenon and subsequent cracking process. In studies of segregation in copper alloys, Michael and
Williams (Ref. 37) showed via analytical electron microscopy (AEM), that so-

Fig. 15 HAZ/fusion zone crack along epitaxial grain boundary in Type 304 (FP 8) spot Varestraint sample. 400X.
lute segregation was extremely sensitive
to grain boundary energy, as influenced
by its local crystallography. For example, they showed that twin boundaries,
w h i c h are known to have low interfacial energy relative to grain boundaries,
had no detectable segregation. This may
explain the absence of liquation along
twin boundaries in Figs. 5B and 6B and
the somewhat random nature of grain
boundary liquation along other grain
boundaries. This same argument can of
course be applied to higher FP austenitic
stainless steels and the duplex stainless
steels. In the former case, the grain
boundary energy will be influenced by
the presence of a second phase.
In contrast to the grain boundary penetration mechanism discussed earlier,
considerable conjecture and speculation still exist regarding the issues contributing to grain boundary liquation in
the absence of a liquating particle. The
lack of fundamental high temperature
phenomenological data for common engineering alloys is the major impediment
to the development of a more concise
segregation-based liquation mechanism.
In the context of the discussion in this
paper, the information necessary to
more rigorously define and formulate
such a mechanism must include the following:
1) Diffusion coefficients for both static
and mobile grain boundaries in ferritic
(BCC) and austenitic (FCC) materials.
These coefficients should be applicable
at temperatures approaching the solidus
for elements such as sulfur, phosphorus,
boron, titanium, niobium and silicon.
2) A thorough phenomenological
treatment of grain boundary sweeping
that considers the influence of crystal

structure, solute and impurity content,

intermetallic and second phase constituents, and prior metallurgical condition (cold worked vs. annealed, for instance).
3) The influence of grain boundary
energy and local crystallographic orientation on segregation and subsequent
liquation of both like- and dissimilarphase boundaries.
4) The behavior of liquid films along
high-temperature grain boundaries with
respect to both wetting characteristics
and influence on boundary mobility.
5) The mechanics of crack initiation
and propagation along liquated boundaries including the influence of liquid
film thickness and capacity for liquid
penetration along solid grain boundaries
(v/z. a viz., liquid metal embrittlement).
6) Strain accommodation and localization in polycrystalline materials at
high temperature, including a treatment
of the influence of grain boundary liquid films.
The HAZ liquation cracking susceptibility of selected austenitic and duplex
stainless steels was evaluated and compared using the spot Varestraint w e l d ability test. These test results and metallograph ic/fractographic observations
were then used as the basis for a more
general discussion of the HAZ liquation
cracking phenomenon. The results of the
weldability tests established a strong correlation between the composition-dependent ferrite potential (FP) and cracking susceptibility, with austenitic stainless steels of low or negligible FP exhibiting the highest susceptibility. The


b e h a v i o r of d u p l e x stainless steels w a s
intermediate between the low-FP and
i n t e r m e d i a t e - F P (FP 8) a u s t e n i t i c s t a i n less steels. T h e highest c r a c k i n g suscept i b i l i t y w a s o b s e r v e d in a h i g h l y
a u s t e n i t i c , m o d i f i e d A 2 8 6 a l l o y that u n d e r w e n t c o n s t i t u t i o n a l l i q u a t i o n a n d exhibited considerable H A Z grain b o u n d ary l i q u a t i o n .
C r a c k i n g in the T y p e 3 0 4 , T y p e 3 0 4 L ,
A l l o y 2205 and Ferralium 255 alloys
c o u l d n o t be a t t r i b u t e d t o t h e c o n s t i t u tional liquation p h e n o m e n o n . Alternatively, the mechanism of H A Z liquation
c r a c k i n g in these a l l o y s i n v o l v e s segreg a t i o n of m e l t i n g p o i n t depressant a l l o y
and/or i m p u r i t y elements to H A Z grain
b o u n d a r i e s . A l t h o u g h the precise e x p l a n a t i o n o f t h i s p r o c e s s is n o t p o s s i b l e
based o n the current u n d e r s t a n d i n g of
the m e t a l l u r g y o f h i g h - t e m p e r a t u r e g r a i n
boundaries, a potential mechanistic app r o a c h is discussed, i n c l u d i n g the i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f t h e issues g e r m a n e t o t h e
d e v e l o p m e n t of a segregation-based l i quation cracking mechanism.
The authors w o u l d like to a c k n o w l edge the W e l d i n g Research C o u n c i l a n d
Edison W e l d i n g Institute for p r o v i d i n g
f i n a n c i a l s u p p o r t for this w o r k . T h e g e n erosity of Haynes Alloys International,
K o k o m o , Ind., Sandvik AB, Sweden, and
Sandia N a t i o n a l Laboratories, Liverm o r e , Calif., for p r o v i d i n g the F e r r a l i u m
2 5 5 , A l l o y 2 2 0 5 a n d m o d i f i e d A 2 8 6 , res p e c t i v e l y , is also a p p r e c i a t e d .
1. Thomas, R. D., Jr. 1 984. H A Z Cracking in thick sections of austenitic stainless
steelspart II. Welding Journal 63(12):355-s
to 368-s.
2. Lundin, C. D., Lee, C. H., M e n o n , R.,
and Osorio, V. 1 988. Weldability evaluations
of modified 316 and 347 austenitic stainless
steels: part l preliminary results. Welding
Journal 67(2):35-sto 46-s.
3. Tamura, H,, and Watanabe, T. 1973.
Mechanism of liquation cracking in the weld

heat-affected zone of austenitic stainless

steels. Trans. JWRI 4(1 ):30.
4. Tamura, H., and Watanabe, T. 1974.
Study on the behavior of grain boundary at
heat-affected zone of SUS 347 and SUS 321
austenitic stainless steels. Trans. JWRI
5. Robinson, J. L., and Scott, M. H. 1980.
Liquation cracking during the w e l d i n g of
austenitic stainless steels and nickel alloys.
Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London, A295:105.
6. Kujanpaa, V. P., D a v i d , S. A., and
White, C. L. 1987. Characterization of heataffected zone cracking in austenitic stainless
steel welds. Welding Journal 66(8):221-s.
7. Savage, W . F., Nippes, E. F., and Szekeres, E. S. 1976. A study of w e l d interface
phenomena in a low-alloy steel. Welding
Journal 55(9):260-s.
8. Baeslack, W . A. Ill, Lippold, J. C , and
Savage, W . F. 1 979. U n m i x e d zone formation in austenitic stainless steel weldments.
Welding Journal 58(6):168-s.
9. King, J. F., and Reed, W . R., Jr. 1976.
Weldability testing of Alloy 800. ORNL Report No. TM-6276.
10. Lippold, J. C. 1 983. A n investigation
of heat-affected zone hot cracking in A l l o y
800. Welding Journal 62(1 ):1 -s.
1 1 . Blum, B. S., and W i t t , R. H. 1963.
Heat-affected zone cracking in A286 w e l d ments. Welding Journal 42(8):365-s.
12. Brooks, J. A. 1974. Effect of alloy modifications on HAZ cracking of A286 stainless
steel. Welding Journal 53(11) :517-s.
13. Thompson, E. C. 1 969. Hot cracking
studies of Alloy 71 8 weld heat-affected zones.
Welding Journal 48(2):70-s.
14. D u v a l l , D. S., and O w z a r s k i , W . A.
1967. Further heat-affected zone studies in
heat-resistant nickel alloys. Welding Journal
15. Thompson, R. C , and G e n c u l u , S.
1983. Microstructural evolution in the HAZ
of Inconel 71 8 and correlation with the hot
ductility test. Welding Journal 62:377-s.
1 6. Savage, W. F and Krantz, B. M. 1966.
An investigation of hot cracking in Hastelloy
X. Welding Journal 31 (1 ):1 3-s.
1 7. Owzarski, W . A., D u v a l l , D. S., and
Sullivan, C. P. 1966. A model for heat-affected zone cracking in nickel base superalloys. Welding Journal 45(4):145-s.
18. Dudley, R. H. 1962. An experimental
investigation of the constitutional liquation
hypothesis. Ph.D. thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, N.Y.
19. Aronson, A. N. 1963. Constitutional


This subcommittee w i l l prepare a series of documents to provide recommended
practices for joining all types and forms of stainless steels. Initially, the Subcommittee will
prepare a guide to joining austenitic stainless steel sheet metal. Later documents will cover
ferritic, martensitic, duplex and precipitation hardening stainless steels in sheet, plate, bar
and cast product forms as well as austenitic stainless steels in product forms other than sheet
metal. The documents will describe the alloys and give typical uses, material preparation,
joint designs, joining parameters, postweld treatments, and precautions. All forms of arc
welding, resistance welding, electron and laser beam welding and brazing will be included
in each document. Persons interested in working with the Subcommittee should contact:
Leonard P. Connor
AWS Headquarters
800-443-9353, Ext. 299

14-s I JANUARY 1992

liquation in the iron-iron carbide system, M.S.

thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy,
20. Pepe, J. J., and Savage, W . F. 1967.
Effects of constitutional liquation in 18-Ni
maraging steel weldments, Welding Journal
2 1 . Pepe, J. J., and Savage, W . F. 1 9 7 0 .
The w e l d heat-affected zone of the 18-Ni
maraging steels. Welding Journal 49(12)
22. D u v a l l , D. S., and O w z a r s k i , W . A.
1 966. Technical note: behavior of solute at
mobile heat-affected zone grain boundaries.
23. Romig, A. D., Lippold, J. C , and Cieslak, M . J. 1988. An analytical electron microscope investigation of the phase transformations in a simulated heat-affected zone in
Alloy 800. Met. Trans. I9A:35.
24. Hillert, M., and Purdy, G. R. 1978.
Chemically induced grain boundary migration. Acta Met. (26):333.
25. Siewert, T. A., M c C o w a n , C. N., and
Olson, D. L. 1988. Ferrite number prediction
to 100 FN in stainless steel weld metal. Welding Journal 67(l2):289-s.
26. G o o d w i n , G. M., Savage, W . F., and
Nippes, E. F. 1977. Effects of minor elements
on hot cracking tendencies of Inconel 600.
Welding Journal 56(8):238-s.
27. Nelson, D. E., Baeslack, W. A. Ill, and
Lippold, J. C. 1985. Characterization of the
weld structure in a duplex stainless steel using
28. Ginn, B. J. 1985. A technique for determining austenite ferrite ratios in welded
duplex stainless steels. TWI Research Bulletin, 26(11).
29. Varol, I., Baeslack, W . A. Ill, and Lippold, J. C. 1989. Characterization of weld solidification cracking in a duplex stainless
steel. Metallography 23(1) 19.
30. Unpublished data generated by the
authors at Edison Welding Institute and The
O h i o State University from 1986 to 1 989.
3 1 . Baeslack, W. A., Ernst, S. C , and Lippold,
J. C. 1 988. Heat-affected zone cracking in a
cobalt-free, low-expansion superalloy. Journal Mat. Sci. Letters, 7:1204.
32. Baeslack, W. A., Ernst, S. C , and Lipp o l d , J. C. 1989. W e l d a b i l i t y of a highstrength, low-expansion superalloy. Welding
Journal 68(10):418-s.
33. Radhakrishnan, B., and Thompson, R.
G. 1990. The kinetics of intergranular liquation in the HAZ of Alloy 71 8. Recent Trends
in Welding Science and Technology, eds. S.
A. David and J. M. Vitek, ASM International,
Materials Park, Ohio.
34. Borland, J. C. 1 960. The generalized
theory of super-solidus cracking in welds and
castings. British Welding Journal 7:508.
35. Kasen, M. B. 1972. Some observations
of boundary segregation during grain growth
annealing of ultrahigh purity aluminum. Acta
Met. 20:105.
36. Smidoda, K., Gottschalk, W., and
Gleiter, H. 1978. Diffusion in migrating i n terfaces. Acta Met. 26:1 833.
37. M i c h a e l , J. R., and W i l l i a m s , D. B.
1984. An analytical electron microscope
study of the kinetics of the equilibrium segregation of bismuth in copper. Met. Trans.