Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Opportunity
Threats
SO
ST
Aggressive advertisement to
combat prospective companies to
enter the market
The utilization of the companys
brand to entice customers
Optimum use of the distribution
chain to maximize profits
WO
WT
Look for alternative innovative
technology that costs less.
Develop products with different
price levels
The integration of customer
lifestyle in product development
to retain customers
Adidas
return
on
equity
increased
from
9.9014.61percent
5.0
Return on invested capital increased from 9.90 to 13.03 percent
6.0
Revenue
increased
compared
to
the
previous
year
3.0
Total= 14.0
Industry Position
Deregulation
provides
geographic
and
product
freedom
4.0
Deregulation increases competition in sports and apparel industry
5.0
Deregulation by certain countries makes it easier for adidas to expand
3.0
Total= 13.0
Stability Position
Competitive Position
Adidas
has
the
largest
market
world-wide
-2.0
Competitors such as Nike are becoming a threat to the company
-4.0
Adidas has a large market share which means that it has large customer base
-3.0
Total = -9.0
Conclusion
SP Average is -15.0/3 = -4
CP Average is -9.0/3 = -3
IP Average is 13.0/3 =4.33
FP Averageis 14.0/3 =4.67
Directional Vector Coordinate x axis = -3 + (4.33) = +1.33
Directional Vector Coordinate y axis = -5 + (4.67) = -.66
Adidas should pursue Competitive Strategies
Since Adidas is competing in an unstable environment it must be wary of
what its competitors is up to. By unstable, we pertain to the competitors that
also have a big market share and directly affect the operation of Adidas. As
they continuously compete with Adidas, Adidas is forced to adjust its
strategies to effectively combat its competitors strategies as Adidas wants to
retain or even increase its market share.
To understand the Boston matrix, you need to understand how market share and
market growth interrelated.
Market share is the percentage of the total market that is being serviced by your
company measured either in the revenue terms or unit volume terms.
This strategy is totally based on the market share of the product and the growth of
the market. It is a typical strategy where the companies should have products with
high growth in large markets and also products that have low growth but can
generate more cash for the company. Based on such combinations of this matrix,
there are four dimensions for this model based on which the companies can
understand how much cash is being generated and consumed. There are four
categories that a company can divide its products based on the BCG Growth matrix.
They are cash cows, stars, problem child and dog.
Alternative 2
attractiven
ess
Total AS
weight
Total AS
0.6
20%
4.0 up
0.8
0.8
20%
4.0
0.8
0.4
10%
4.0
0.4
0.4
20%
2.0
0.4
0.8
20%
1.0 down
0.2
0.4
10%
100%
4.0
0.4
0.2
10%
2.0
0.2
n
Change in
consumer
lifestyle
Technological
innovation
Threats
Growing
power of
customers to
set prices
Financial
slowdown
New
competitors
entering the
market
SUM WEIGHT
SUM
ATTRACTIVEN
ESS SCORE:
20%
2.0
0.4
20%
2.0
0.4
20%
4.0
0.8
20%
2.0 down
0.4
10%
2.0
0.2
10%
2.0
0.2
20%
3.0
0.6
20%
3.0
0.6
20%
3.0
0.6
20%
3.0
0.6
100%
100%
6.2
>
5.4
Source:
http://www.ukessays.com/essays/marketing/adidas-focuses-onsports-and-the-brand-specialises-marketing-essay.php
http://knowledgeforall79.blogspot.com/2012/05/space-matrixexample.html
http://financials.morningstar.com/ratios/r.html?t=ADDYY
http://ycharts.com/companies/ADDYY/debt_equity_ratio