Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/5386506
CITATIONS
DOWNLOADS
VIEWS
100
227
179
2 AUTHORS:
Carsten Pedersen
Peter Langridge
University of Copenhagen
University of Adelaide
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Abstract: Using the Aegilops tauschii clone pAsl together with the barley clone pHvG38 for two-colour fluorescence in situ
hybridization (FISH) the entire chromosome complement of hexaploid wheat was identified. The combination of the two probes
allowed easy discrimination of the three genomes of wheat. The banding pattern obtained with the pHvG38 probe containing the
GAA-satellite sequence was identical to the N-banding pattern of wheat. A detailed idiogram was constructed, including
73 GAA bands and 48 pAsl bands. Identification of the wheat chromosomes by FISH will be particularly useful in connection
with the physical mapping of other DNA sequences to chromosomes, or for chromosome identification in general, as an
alternative to C-banding.
Key words: Triticum aestivum, chromosome identification, fluorescence in situ hybridization, repetitive DNA sequences.
RCsumC : En employant comme sondes les clones pAsl de 1'Aegilops tauschii et pHvG38 de l'orge pour rCaliser une hybridation
in situ ii fluorescence (FISH) bicolore, il a CtC possible d'identifier tous les chromosomes du blC hexaploi'de. La combinaison de
ces deux sondes permet de distinguer aisCment les trois gCnomes du blC. Le motif de bandes obtenu avec la sonde pHvG38,
laquelle contient la sCquence satellite GAA, est identique au motif des bandes N chez le blC. Un idiogramme dCtaillC a CtC produit
incluant les 73 bandes GAA et les 48 bandes pAsl. L'identification des chromosomes du blC par hybridation FISH sera
particuli5rement utile pour rCaliser cargtographie physique de siquences ou encore pour l'identification chromosomique en
gCnCra1, comme alternative ii la coloration des bandes C.
Mots clels : Triticum aestivum, identification chromosomique, hybridization in situ ii fluorescence, sCquences d' ADN rCpCtCes.
Introduction
Chromosome identification by C-banding is widely used in
wheat cytogenetic research, and a standard karyotype has been
described (Gill et al. 1991). The in situ hybridization technique
provides a method to localize genes or DNA sequences
directly on chromosomes and has been used intensively for
physical mapping of repetitive DNA sequences and multicopy
and low-copy gene families in plants (Jiang and Gill 1994).
While C-banding has the advantage that all constitutive
heterochromatin is detected, in situ hybridization offers the
opportunity to relate repetitive DNA sequences to distinct
chromosomal sites. Further, two-colour or multicolour fluo-
rescence in situ hybridization (FISH) enables physical mapping of a sequence of interest and chromosome identification
using one or more repetitive sequences simultaneously. The
chromosomal distribution of several repetitive DNA families
has been studied in wheat. The DNA sequences providing the
best banding patterns by in situ hybridization to wheat chromosomes include the Aegilops tauschii clone pAs 1, which
permits identification of the D-genome chromosomes
(Rayburn and Gill 1986, 1987), the rye clone pSc 119.2, which
especially hybridizes to B-genome chromosomes (McIntyre et
al. 1990; Mukai et al. 1993), and the GAA-satellite sequence,
which has multiple hybridization sites on the B-genome chromosomes and some minor sites on A- and D-genome chromosomes (Dennis et al. 1980: Pedersen et al. 1996). However, it
has not been possible to identify the whole chromosome complement by in situ hybridization alone. Mukai et al. (1993)
combined pAs 1 and pSc119.2 for two-colour FISH and were
able to identify 17 of the 21 wheat chromosome pairs. The
hybridization pattern of the GAA-satellite sequence on barley
chromosomes has previously been studied in detail (Pedersen
et al. 1996). It was found that the GAA-satellite sequence
hybridizes to the class of heterochromatin that is stained by
N-banding. In this study we present a detailed wheat molecular karyotype based on both the GAA-satellite sequence and
the pAsl sequence, and show that together ,these two
sequences permit identification of all wheat chromosomes by
two-colour FISH.
01997 NRC Canada
FISH
The slides were incubated in 0.2 pg/mL proteinase K for 10 min at
37"C, washed twice with 2x SSC, and subsequently treated with
100 pg/mL DNase-free RNase in 2x SSC for 1 h at 37"C, washed in
2x SSC, dehydrated in ethanol, and air-dried. Chromosomal DNA
was denatured in 0.2 N HCl at 37C for 10 min, as described previously (Pedersen and Linde-Laursen 1994). The probe mixture was
denatured at 95C for 5 min and chilled on ice. About 50 pL of the
probe mixture was applied per slide, covered with a 24 x 50 mm
cover slip, sealed, and incubated in a moist chamber at 37C overnight. Cover slips were removed and the slides were washed twice in
2x SSC at 37C for 10 min, once in 0 . 2 SSC
~ at 45C for 10 min, and
once in 2x SSC at 37C before transferring to the detection buffer
(4x SSC plus 0.2% Tween 20). The slides were blocked in detection
buffer containing 5% BSA for about 15 min.
For detection of biotin-labelled and digoxigenin-labelled probes
simultaneously, the slides were first incubated with 5 pg/mL
ExtrAvidin-FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) (Sigma) in detection
buffer with 5% BSA and 1 pg/mL monoclonal anti-digoxigenin
(Boehringer Mannheim). After washing, the slides were incubated
with 5 pg/mL biotinylated Anti-avidin (Sigma) and 5 pg/mL antimouse Ig digoxigenin (Boehringer Mannheim). The third incubation
was with 5 pg/mL ExtrAvidin-FITC and 5 pg/mL anti-digoxigenin
rhodamine (Boehringer Mannheim). Each incubation was done in a
moist chamber at 37C for 45 min and this was followed by washing
the slides 3 times in detection buffer. After the final washing step, the
slides were dehydrated in 70 and 100% ethanol (3 min each) and airdried. The slides were mounted in an antifade solution (Krenik et al.
1989) containing 0.4 pg/mL 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole(DAPI),
or both DAPI and propidium iodide (0.25 pg/mL) when only FITC
detection was used.
591
Fig. 1. FISH to metaphase chromosomes of the ph2a deletion mutant of 'Chinese Spring'. (a)The pAsl probe detected with rhodamine (red)
viewed with a dual filter permitting observation of the yellow FITC signals. (b) The pHvG38 probe detected with FITC (yellow-green). The
strongest pAsl signals (red) are also visible. (c) Chromosomes counterstained with DAPI. Scale bars = 10 pm. Fig. 2. FISH to chromosomes
of 'Chinese Spring' with pHvG38 detected with FITC.The chromosomes are counterstained with propidium iodide. Scale bar = 10 pm.
Fig. 3. Idiograrn of chromosomes of 'Chinese Spring' wheat showing the locations of pAsl (red bands) and pHvG38 (green bands) on drawn
chromosomes side by side with FISH photographs of the same chromosomes. Chromosomes hybridized with the GAA-satellite sequence
(pHvG38) and counterstained with propidium iodide are on the right of the drawn chromosomes, while two-colour FISH photographs with both
probes are shown pairwise on the left of chromosomes 4A, 5A, 7A, lB, 3B, 6B, 7B, and 2D. The pAsl sites detected with FITC (green) or
rhodarnine (red) are all on the left. Chromosomes are drawn after Gill et al. (1991).
I I:,
NOR
Acknowledgement
The work was supported by a grant from the Danish Agricultural and Veterinary Research Council to C.P.
References
Badaeva, E.D., Friebe, B., and Gill, B.S. 1996. Genome differentiation in Aegilops. l . Distribution of highly repetitive DNA
sequences on chromosomes of diploid species. Genome, 39: 293306.
Dennis, E.S., Gerlach, W.L., and Peacock, W.J. 1980. Identical polypyrimidine-polypurine satellite DNAs in wheat and barley.
Heredity, 44: 349-366.
Endo, T.R., and Gill, B.S. 1984. Somatic karyotype, heterochromatin distribution, and nature of chromosome differentiation in
common wheat, Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell. Chromosoma,
89: 361-369.
Gill, B.S., Friebe, B., and Endo, T.R. 1991. Standard karyotype and
nomenclature system for description of chromosome bands and
structural aberrations in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Genome, 34:
830-839.
Heslop-Harrison, J.S., Hamson, G.E., and Leitch, I.J. 1992. Reprobing of DNA:DNA in situ hybridization preparations. Trends
Genet. 8: 372-373.
Jiang, J., and Gill, B.S. 1994. Nonisotopic in situ hybridization and
plant genome mapping: the first 10 years. Genome, 37: 7 17-725.
Krenik, K.D., Kephart, G.M., Offord, K.P., Dunnette, S.L., and
Gleich, G.J. 1989. Comparison of anti-fading agents used in
immunofluorescence. J. Immunol. Methods, 117: 91-97.
McIntyre, C.L., Pereira, S., Moran, L.B., and Appels, R. 1990. New
Secale cereale (rye) DNA derivatives for the detection of rye
chromosome segments in wheat. Genome, 33: 635-640.
Mukai, Y., Nakahara, Y., and Yamamoto, M. 1993. Simultaneous
discrimination of the three genomes in hexaploid wheat by multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization using total genomic and
highly repeated DNA probes. Genome, 36: 4894.94.
Olin-Fatih, M., and Heneen, W.K. 1992. C-banded karyotypes of
Brassica campestris, B. oleracea, and B. napus. Genome, 35:
583-589.
Pan, W.H., Houben, A., and Schlegel, R. 1993. Highly effective cell
synchronization in plant roots by hydroxyurea and amiprophosmethyl or colchicine. Genome, 36: 387-390.
Pedersen, C., and Linde-Laursen, I. 1994. Chromosomal locations of
four minor rDNA loci and a marker microsatellite sequence in
barley. Chromosome Res. 2: 65-7 1.
Pedersen, C., Rasmussen, S.K., and Linde-Laursen, I. 1996.
Genome and chromosome identification in cultivated barley and
related species of the Triticeae (Poaceae) by in situ hybridization
with the GAA-satellite sequence. Genome, 39: 93-104.
Rayburn, A.L., and Gill, B.S. 1986. Molecular identification of the
D-genome chromosomes of wheat. J. Hered. 77: 253-255.
Rayburn, A.L., and Gill, B.S. 1987. Isolation of a D-genome specific
repeated DNA sequence from Aegilops tauschii. Plant Mol. Biol.
Rep. 4: 102-109.
Wiegant, J., Wiesmeijer, C.C., Hoovers, J.M.N., Schuuring, E.,
d'Azzo, A., Vrolijk, J., and Tanke, H.J. 1993. Multiple and
sensitive fluorescence in situ hybridization with rhodamine-,
fluorecein-, and coumarin-labeled DNAs. Cytogenet. Cell Genet.
63: 73-76.