lecture quantum mechanics operators

© All Rights Reserved

8 views

lecture quantum mechanics operators

© All Rights Reserved

- ch15
- Afflux calculation.pdf
- Effect of Acids n Bases on Tensile Strength of Fibre
- metallica batman statics
- PARTICLE 2
- SITUATIE Existenta -Str. Jarului Nr21
- Anchor Block Design
- m3l5
- (2(.pdf
- Dynamic stability of slender columns with semi-rigid connections under periodic axial load-theory.pdf
- presentazione
- FREQUENCIES
- 19-12-jm-a.pdf
- Conclusion Work
- free vibration of variable stiffness composite laminate
- Ejemplo 1
- 1DOF Time Response
- Heisenberg
- ACI 350.3-06 Appendix B Seismic Loads for Liquid-Containing Rectangular RC Tank_Rev1.1_09-Nov-2014.xlsx
- Problem 4 002

You are on page 1of 3

January 24, 2011

1

1.1

Lecture 2

Parity Continued

Remember symmetry means that there is some generator that commutes with the Hamiltonian

[H, S] = 0

(1)

We also mentioned that symmetries will introduce degeneracies of quantum states. It is not necessary that

all symmetries give degeneracy, for example in harmonic oscillator potential, there is always the parity

symmetry, but there is no degenerate odd and even states.

Remember we have continuous and discrete symmetries. Last time we started a somewhat detailed

discussion of parity symmetry. Remember it is just the operation of inverting all of the spatial axes.

It was shown that this operator is both

x x. We denote the quantum mechanical operator as .

unitary and hermitian

=

1 =

(2)

This constraints the eigenvalues of the operator to be 1. By its definition we saw that parity operator

anticommutes with the position and momentum operators and commutes with the angular momentum

operator

n

o

n

o

h

i

x = 0,

p = 0,

J =0

,

,

,

(3)

We call the vectors that anticommute with parity polar vectors, and those commuting with parity pseu scalars and operators anticommuting with

pseudoscalars.

We call quantum states odd or even if their wavefunctions satisfy

(x) = (x)

(4)

And remember Y`m has parity (1)` . Suppose we have a Hamiltonian that commutes with the parity

The proof

operator, and the energy eigenstate |ni is nondegenerate, then |ni is also an eigenstate of .

1

2

is quite straightforward. Because = 1, we can see obviously that 2 (1 ) |ni is an eigenstate of the

parity operator

|ni = 1

2 |ni = 1 1

|ni

1 1

(5)

2

2

2

Because the parity operator commutes with the Hamiltonian, the above two states, by construction are

also energy eigenstates with energy En . But by assumption we know that the energy spectrum is nondegenerate, so one of the above states must be zero, the other proportional to |ni. This proves that the

state |ni is an eigenstate of the parity operator.

1

1.2

Examples

= 0, since x2

Lets see some examples. Consider simple harmonic oscillator, where we know that [H, ]

2

and p are scalars. We know the energy eigenstates to be

|0i ,

1

a )n |0i

|ni = (

n!

(6)

We know that the ground state is a gaussian, therefore even. We can also get this fact by a simple argument.

Remember the ground state is defined by a

|0i = 0, and that both a

and a

are linear combinations of x

and p, so both of them should anticommute with the parity operator. Now if we operate a

on the wave

function 0 (x) = hx|0i then we will get a differential equation which tells us that the wavefunction is even.

For the excited states we can use the anticommutation relation

|1i =

a |0i =

|0i = |1i

(7)

Now lets consider a symmetric double well potential. For simplicity we consider finite square wells.

Because it is a 1D problem we know that the energy eigenstates all have even or odd parity. If we call the

even state |Si and the odd state |Ai, then we have

|Si = |Si ,

|Ai = |Ai

(8)

and that ES < EA . This can be seen when we take the barrier in the middle to zero, then the well becomes

a infinite square well, where the antisymmetric state is the excited state. If we take the barrier to be

infinitely large, then the two states are degenerate. We can define the left and right states by taking the

symmetric and antisymmetric combinations of the two states, and these are not parity eigenstates

1

|Li = (|Si |Ai) ,

2

1

|Ri = (|Si + |Ai)

2

(9)

Now lets consider time evolution and take the initial state to be |, t = 0i = |Li, then the subsequent

states will become

1

|, t > 0i = eiES t/~ |Si eiEA t/~ |Ai |Si eit |Ai

(10)

2

So if ES 6= EA then we have tunnelling between the two states and the oscillation frequency between the

two is = (EA ES )/~.

A concrete example of this comes from organic molecules, for example NH3 . If we take the hydrogen

atoms to be in the same plane, then the nitrogen atom can be either above or below the plane. Because

there is some energy difference between them, these will oscillate with frequency = 24 MHz.

Recall our discussion of tunnelling using the WKB approximation. When the well is symmetric and

barrier is very large, then the probability for tunnelling will be exponentially small, and the energy difference

EA ES will also be exponentially small.

Suppose now we have an asymmetric double well. If we neglect tunnelling, we can use |Li and |Ri as

a basis with energies L and R . Any state can be written as

|i = cL |Li + cR |Ri

(11)

Now we want to account for tunnelling effects. We modify our Hamiltonian to have a slight off-diagonal

perturbation hL|H|Ri = I. It is easy to diagonalize this 2 2 Hamiltonian

E 2 (L + R ) E + (L R |I|2 ) = 0

(12)

with energies

r

(L R )2

L + R

E=

+ |I|2

(13)

2

4

Now that we have the expression, lets consider two limits. First consider |L R | I then the energies

are approximately

I2

(14)

E = L,R + O

|L R |2

On the other hand when |L R | I then the energies become

L + R

E=

|I| + O

2

|L R |2

I2

!

(15)

In both cases we always have E1 E0 2 |I|. So even if the energies L and R crosses at some point,

the above two states will never cross, and always separated by energy at least 2 |I|. This is called the

Wigner-von Neumann noncrossing rule.

Suppose we have a spin 1/2 particle in a magnetic field B = (Bx , Bz ). The Hamiltonian is

Bz Bx

H = 2B B S = 2B (Bx Sx + Bz Sz ) = ~B

(16)

Bx Bz

If we compare this Hamiltonian with the one above for asymmetric double well, we find them to be the

same form. The correspondence is

|L R | 2~B Bz ,

I ~B Bx

(17)

The states are in 1-1 correspondence as the above case. We know that this corresponds to spin precession

around the magnetic field, which is in analogue with the oscillation between the two potential wells. These

two phenomena are mathematically the same.

- ch15Uploaded byYamaneko Shin
- Afflux calculation.pdfUploaded byAnonymous 2bHiuA
- Effect of Acids n Bases on Tensile Strength of FibreUploaded byShubhangi
- metallica batman staticsUploaded bynsk2242278
- PARTICLE 2Uploaded byharsimu
- SITUATIE Existenta -Str. Jarului Nr21Uploaded byemil_tase949
- Anchor Block DesignUploaded byrameshb308
- m3l5Uploaded byapi-3696315
- (2(.pdfUploaded byisraaahmed12
- Dynamic stability of slender columns with semi-rigid connections under periodic axial load-theory.pdfUploaded bypuppyarav2726
- presentazioneUploaded byokochafly
- FREQUENCIESUploaded byanthony_obiora
- 19-12-jm-a.pdfUploaded byAaryan Sharma
- Conclusion WorkUploaded byAndrey Guilherme
- free vibration of variable stiffness composite laminateUploaded byAdnan Ahmed
- Ejemplo 1Uploaded byBaltasar Chente Conde Cuamatzi
- 1DOF Time ResponseUploaded byDavid Lo
- HeisenbergUploaded byrahmawatirais
- ACI 350.3-06 Appendix B Seismic Loads for Liquid-Containing Rectangular RC Tank_Rev1.1_09-Nov-2014.xlsxUploaded byNelson Echeverria
- Problem 4 002Uploaded byIhab El Aghoury
- Engg.cw Date Sheet(29 Aug2016)Uploaded byMuhammad Sohail Tariq
- 4.237-M.Sc_.-PhysicsUploaded byRajkumar Muthumanickam
- Mathcad FDNUploaded bybagmass
- dftr pstkUploaded byudin
- BH-8.00Uploaded byNaveen Chodagiri
- 00790___77d1ef61e09d15e637d4fbe8ed162f85Uploaded bySupriya
- Analysis of well foundationUploaded byvijay
- Preheting Burners CalcUploaded bysaudiman
- HORZ-VFD[1]Uploaded bySrutha Keerthi
- Bernardini Et Al - ANIDIS - AggregatiUploaded byfra

- Astronomy.pdfUploaded byJose
- 8Uploaded byJose
- 7Uploaded byJose
- 5Special RelativityUploaded byJose
- Diving Into ROOTUploaded bybasitharmonik
- 750.WilsonsReview.pdfUploaded byJose
- 3Uploaded byJose
- 2 Special Rel.Uploaded byJose
- Cosmic EvolutionUploaded byJeremiah Nayosan
- An Illustrated Guide Relativity 1Uploaded byJose
- Big bang 2.pdfUploaded byJose
- Trigger - 5pagsUploaded byJose
- https://es.scribd.com/upload-document?archive_doc=249407660&escape=false&metadata=%7B%22context%22%3A%22archive_view_restricted%22%2C%22page%22%3A%22read%22%2C%22action%22%3Afalse%2C%22logged_in%22%3Atrue%2C%22platform%22%3A%22web%22%7DUploaded byJose
- Text Book - 11pags - Root Users GuideUploaded byJose
- Galaxy formation.pdfUploaded byJose
- BBC Focus the Theory of Nearly Everything 2016Uploaded byJose
- Great Climate ExperimentUploaded byJose
- Natural Units 3Uploaded byJose
- Operator lesson PowerPoint.pdfUploaded byJose
- Double WellUploaded byJose
- Posible 3Uploaded byJose
- LUUploaded byJose
- Lu Tri DiagonalUploaded byJose
- eaa-wimps-machos.pdfUploaded byJose
- Apperture NADAUploaded byJose
- Varios casos antenas https://es.scribd.com/document/322912974/EM-Waves-R-S-ShevgaonkarUploaded byJose

- Vectors MatricesUploaded bySanjeev Neo Jaiswal
- Work Chapter TestUploaded byEpay Castañares Lascuña
- Local Orthogonality Provides Better Upper Bound for Hardy's Nonlocality - Subhadipa Das, Manik Banik, Md. Rajjak Gazi, Ashutosh Rai, Samir KunkriUploaded byCambiador de Mundo
- Rec9 SolutionsUploaded byVipin Gupta
- 2013-example-03Uploaded byeouahiau
- prob.pdfUploaded bySatkas Dimitrios
- Modern Physics and the Energy Conservation Objection to Mind-body DualismUploaded byK.Ramachandran
- XII_Mathematics_MS_2018-19.pdfUploaded bySushant Bagul
- Fisika Nonlinear 2Uploaded byYuliana Yui ChLove
- [Chew, G.F.] S-Matrix Theory of Strong InteractionsUploaded byratallix
- 41_Bastos_Ferreira_TorresUploaded byNuno Bastos
- The search for Primordial Quark Nuggets among Near Earth AsteroidsUploaded byardeegee
- lkm 3 dan 4Uploaded byJATI
- 5.1 ParabolaUploaded byRamchandra Murthy
- Chapter 22 Electric FieldsUploaded byShaker Ullah Chowdhury
- Paramagnetic Half SpinsUploaded byNikhil Nehra
- interstellarUploaded byapi-285241095
- GraphingGraphing on Sphere on SphereUploaded byAlex Karadimos
- Planck Constant - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaUploaded byd_richard_d
- From Fundamentals to Applications – Quantum Electrodynamics, Strong Fields, Ion-Matter InteractionsUploaded byMutrexcz
- Lee J.M. Introduction to smooth manifolds - errata.pdfUploaded byPetr Ivankov
- MATH F111 Handout.docxUploaded byPiyush Palawat
- 09_OlivierThomas_CNAM_ManlabUploaded byVan Nghi Nguyen
- [Iurato & Ruta] on the Role of Virtual Work in Levi-Civita's Parallel TransportUploaded byCaio Viega
- Parallel universeUploaded byNishant Madanagopal
- Wolfson Eup3 Ch36 Test BankUploaded byifghelpdesk
- The mathematical theory of black holes. Mathematical connections with some sectors of String Theory and Number Theory (2010)Uploaded byMichele Nardelli
- Phy c 10003 Exam Answers 2011Uploaded byDilshan Jayasuriya
- Lecture 2Uploaded byMahesh Gahlot
- IGCSEFM MatrixTransformations Exercises 2Uploaded bynancyjayapala

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.