1 views

Uploaded by Majid Roshani

Tube Evaporation Heat Transfer of Refrigerant Mixtures

- Alfred-Almond CSD Building 5002
- Energy Simulation in Buiding Design
- Heater Air Conditioner
- Designing of Cold Stores and Choosing of Cooling System Elements
- Introduction 15-03-14
- Earth Air Tunnel Parameter
- Thermal Engineering
- technical report（tck)
- Ashrae Revision 2005 to 2008
- Dowtherm HT Product Brochure
- VessFire Offshore Technology White Paper
- Forster Paper
- How Does Basic Refrigeration Cycle Work
- Fabrication Of Air Conditioner Integrated With Water Cooler And Water Heater
- SI Heat 5e Chap01 Lecture Formatted
- AHRI Groundwater Assessment
- Thermal Efficiency of Building Clusters
- RER Primer White Paper
- Chapter 1 Introduction
- Heat Transfer

You are on page 1of 8

Purdue e-Pubs

International Refrigeration and Air Conditioning

Conference

1994

Mixtures

T. M. Doerr

Iowa State University

M. B. Pate

Iowa State University

Doerr, T. M. and Pate, M. B., "In Tube Evaporation Heat Transfer of Refrigerant Mixtures" (1994). International Refrigeration and Air

Conditioning Conference. Paper 291.

http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iracc/291

This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact epubs@purdue.edu for

additional information.

Complete proceedings may be acquired in print and on CD-ROM directly from the Ray W. Herrick Laboratories at https://engineering.purdue.edu/

Herrick/Events/orderlit.html

Thomas M. Doerr and Michael B. Pate, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa

ABSTRACT

Heat transfer coefficient data was taken during in-tube evaporation of five differenct refrigerant mixtures. These

and 4C.

measurements were performed in a 318" O.D. (9.7 mm) smooth copper tube at refrigerant temperatures of

Four different mass fluxes ranging from 125 to 375 kg/s-m2 were tested. On a mass basis, the five different mixtures tested

were: R-125 (40%) I R-32 (60%), R-32 (30%) I R-125 (10%) I R-134a (60%), R-134a (90%) I R-32 (10%), R-125 (44%) I

R-143a (52%) I R-134a (4%), and R-134a (75%) I R-32 (25%). The evaporative heat transfer coefficient for the mixtures

were also compared to data for R-22.

-zoe

The mixture R-32(60%) I R-125(40%) exhibited the highest heat transfer coefficients out of all the refrigerants

tested at both 4C and

when compared on both an equal mass flux and an equal cooling capacity basis. The R-321

R-125 mixture also had a lower pressure drop than R-22. The mixture R-134a(90%) I R-32(10%) had the lowest heat

transfer coefficients at both 4C and

when compared on both an equal mass flux and an equal cooling capacity basis.

In addition, this same mixture had the highest pressure drop. Except for the lowest performing refrigerant, all of the

refrigerants performed either similar or better than R-22. An evaluation of temperature effects showed that the refrigerants

had larger heat transfer coefficients at 4e than at -2C.

-zoe

_zoe

INTRODUCTION

Non-azeotropic refrigerant mixtures are being considered as potential replacements for R-22. In this study five

different refrigerant mixtures were tested for evaporation heat transfer coefficients and compared against a baseline ofR-22

data. These refrigerants were tested in an in-tube heat transfer test facility, which has been used in the past for evaporation

and condensation tests ofrefrigerants R-12, R-113, R-22, and R-134a [Eckels and Pate, 1991, Doerr, et al., 1994]. Several

problems are unique to testing non-azeotropic blends, such as a temperature glide which makes measurement of the inlet

and outlet temperatures, where the quality can vary as much as 0 to 100%, more difficult than it does for a pure refrigerant.

Heat transfer coefficient data was taken during in-tube evaporation of refrigerant mixtures in a 318" O.D. (9.7 mm)

smooth copper tube. The data were taken at temperatures of -2.0C and 4.0C. Five non-azeotropic refrigerant mixtures

were tested and compared against baseline data for R-22. Four different mass fluxes ranging from 125 to 375 kgls-m2 were

tested. On a mass basis, the mixtures tested were:

Mixture 1

Mixture 2

Mixture 3

Mixture 4

Mixture 5

R-134a (90%) I R-32 (10%)

R-134a (75%) I R-32 (25%)

R-32 (30%) I R-125 (10%) I R-134a (60%)

R-125 (44%) I R-143a (52%) I R-134a (4%)

TEST FACILITY

The test facility consists offour main parts: a refrigerant loop, a water loop, a data acquisition system, and a dual test

section. For these tests only one side of the dual test section was used. The following sections provides detailed

descriptions of the four main parts of the test facility. A schematic of the test rig is shown in Figure 1.

Test Section

The test section consists of a horizontal test tube and a surrounding annulus. The inner tube is a 318" O.D. (9.7 mm)

copper tube which is 3.67 m long. The annulus which surrounds the tube is also 3.67 m long and is constructed of a

copper tube with a 17.2 mm inside diameter. The test tube is centered in the annulus by a series of spacers. The spacers

are constructed of three stainless steel rods spaced 120 degrees about the annulus. The spacers are held in place by a series

of industrial PG Teflon glands.

477

The test section is instrumented with temperature and pressure sensors. The temperatures are measured with

resistance type temperature probes, RTDs, which have been calibrated to an accuracy of 0.05C. The pressure is

measured with a calibrated strain-gage type pressure transducer which is accurate to 9 kPa. The pressure drop in the test

section is measured with a strain-gage type differential pressure transducer accurate to 0.2 kPa.

Refrigerant Loop

The refrigerant loop consists of an after-condenser, a positive displacement pump, an accumulator, and a boiler. The

after-condenser is a co-axial heat exchanger which condenses and subcools the refrigerant leaving the test section. The

water-glycol mixture for the heat exchanger is provided by a R-502 chilling unit. After being subcooled the refrigerant is

circulated by a positive displacement pump. The pressure in the test section is controlled by the bladder accumulator. This

accumulator also helps to dampen out pressure fluctuations that may occur in the system. The quality of the refrigerant

entering the test section is set by a heater located directly upstream of the test section. The heater is a 12.7 mm O.D. by

2.63 m long stainless steel tube heated by direct current. The heater is electrically isolated from the rest of the system by a

high pressure rubber hose. The refrigerant mass flow rate is measured by a coriolis type mass flow meter accurate to

0.15% of the mass flow rate plus 2.25e...Q5 kg/s.

Water Loop

The water loop consists of a centrifugal pump, an in-line electric heater, and a heat exchanger. The mass flow rate is

controlled by a valve that restricts the flow of water. The temperature of the water entering the test section is controlled by

an electric heater. The water mass flow rate is also measured by a coriolis type flow meter with an accuracy of 0.15% of

the mass flow rate plus 2.25e...Q4 kg/s.

Data Acquisition

Data acquisition is done with a personal computer, a 40 channel scanner, and a multimeter. The controlling program

on the personal computer is written in FORTRAN and controls the multimeter and the scanner via a IEEE-488 bus.

EXPE~ENTALPROCEDURE

The test facility is allowed to come to steady state before the final data acquisition is done. This is achieved by

setting the mass flow rates, the refrigerant quality, and the annulus water temperatures, with the latter controlling the

outlet quality. The data acquisition system then scans for temperature, mass flow rate, and pressure fluctuations. When

the fluctuations are minimal the final data acquisition program is run. Each of the channels is scanned a total of five times

while the pressure is scanned 35 times because of pressure drop fluctuations. The inlet quality is maintained between 8

and 15% and the outlet quality is kept between 80 and 85%.

DATA ANALYSES

Raw data from the data acquisition system are analyzed for each run to determine the in-tube heat transfer

coefficient and the quality. The main equations used in processing the raw data are based on energy balances. The energy

transferred in the test section is computed from an energy balance on the water side.

Qw = ~Cpw(Tw,out - Tw,in)

(1)

The quality change in the test section is determined from the energy change of the water side.

ll.X = Qw I (Mrhfg)

(2)

The refrigerant-side heat transfer coefficient is determined from an overall heat transfer coefficient and the annulusside heat transfer coefficient. The annulus-side heat transfer coefficient, h 0 , was determined by using a modified Wilson

plot technique over the range of flow rates and temperatures encountered during evaporation tests. The correlation for the

annulus side heat transfer coefficient is a resulting from the Wilson plot technique is a Dittus-Boelter type equation. The

overall heat transfer coefficient is determined from the energy balance on the test section.

(3)

478

The log mean temperature clifference is determined from the inlet and outlet temperatures on the water and refrigerant

sides.

(4)

where

(5)

(6)

Assuming the thermal resistance of the copper tubing as negligible, the refrigerant-side heat transfer coefficient is then

determined from

hI

= 1 I (1/U

- 1/h0 ) "!

A./A0

(7)

EXPERUKENTALDATA

R-22 and five refrigerant mixtures were tested for heat transfer coefficients and pressure drops during evaporation at

-2C and 4C. The mass fluxes tested ranged from 125 kg/sm2 to 375 kg/sm2.

Data Results

Heat Transfer Coefficients

The different refrigerants were compared on an equal cooling capacity basis as well as an equal mass flux basis to

try to eliminate the clifferences due solely to the difference in their enthalpies of vaporization. Figures 2 and 3 shows

heat

-transfer coefficients versus mass flux for all the refrigerants at both -2.0C and 4.0C. When the refrigerants are compared

on a mass flux basis, mixture 1 performs the best having a heat transfer coefficient approximately 90% larger than R-22 for

a mass flux of 375 kg/sm2 at 4C and almost double the heat transfer coefficients ofR-22 for a mass flux of 125 kg/sm2.

Mixture 2 had the lowest performance of all the mixtures with a heat transfer coefficient almost 20% lower than R-22 at a

mass flux of 375 kg/sm2 and a heat transfer coefficient almost 10% lower than R-22 for a mass flux of 125 kg/sm2.

A summary of results is listed in Table 1 where the ratio of the heat transfer coefficients for the mixture compared to

R-22 for a mass flux of300 kg/sm2 at temperatures of 4C and -2C is presented.

TABLE 1

Ratio of Heat Transfer Coefficients to R.:22 at 300 kglsm2

Table 2 shows the ratio of the heat transfer coefficients for the refrigerants at 4C compared to -2C for a mass flux

of300 kg/s m2. All of the refrigerants tested had higher heat transfer coefficients at 4 C than at -2 C. For example, at a mass

flux of 300 kg/sm2 the heat transfer coefficient ofR-22 is approximately 12% larger at 4C than at -2C.

TABLE2

Ratio of Heat Transfer Coefficients at 4C Compared to -2C at 300 kg/sm2

An approximate cooling capacity can be defined as the mass flow rate of the refrigerant multiplied by the

refrigerants enthalpy of vaporization, which assumes a 100% quality change. Figures 4 and 5 show plots of refrigerant

heat transfer coefficients versus cooling capacity. When the refrigerants are compared on an equal cooling capacity basis,

479

then mixture 1, R-32(60%) I R-125(40%), perfonned the best, having a heat transfer coefficient almost 90% larger than

R-22 for a cooling capacity of 35 kJ/sm2 at an evaporator temperature of 4C. A comparison summary of the different

mixtures are shown in Table 3 where the ratio of the heat transfer coefficients for the mixture compared to R-22 are listed

for a cooling capacity of 45 kJ/s-m2 at temperatures of -2C and 4C. As shown in Table 3, mixture 1 has the highest heat

transfer coefficient when compared on an equal cooling capacity basis while mixture 2 has the lowest performance.

TABLEJ

Ratio of Heat Transfer Coefficients to R-22 at 45 k.Jlsm 2 Compared on an Equal Cooling Capacity Basis

It should be noted that other sources of data have shown heat transfer performances of the R-32(60%) I R-125(40%)

mixture somewhat lower than that reported in this paper. Specifically, Bivens, et al. (1993) reported that the heat transfer

performance for R-32(60%) I R-125(40%) is 50% to 60% higher than R-22. The reasons for the differences from these two

studies is still being investigated.

Pressure Drop

Pressure drop data were also taken for the refrigerant mixtures during evaporation, and the data are plotted in

Figures 6 and 7. As can be seen from the graphs, the pressure drops for mixtures 2 and 3 are greater than R-22 while the

pressure drops for mixtures 1 and 5 are less than R-22. These trends occur at both 4 and -2C. The pressure drop for

mixture 4 is the closest to R-22, with the mixture having a slightly larger pressure drop than R-22 at 4C and about the

same pressure drop as R-22 at -2C. All of the refrigerants exhibited larger pressure drops at -2C than at 4C. This trend

is probably due to the higher viscosity of the refrigerants at the lower temperature. The above comparisons are summarized

in Table 4 where the ratio of the pressure drops for the mixtures compared to R-22 are listed for a mass flux of 300 kg/sm2

at a temperature of 4C.

TABLE4

Ratio of pressure drop versus R-22 at 4C and 300 kg/s-m2

4.0C

0.88

1.29

1.22

1.10

0.66

Property Data

All of the thennodynamic and transport properties for the refrigerants used in this study were supplied by a

refrigerant manufacturer [DuPont, 1993].

CONCLUSION

The mixture R-32(60%) I R-125(40%) exhibited the highest heat transfer coefficients out of all the refrigerants

tested at both 4C and -2C when compared on both an equal mass flux and an equal cooling capacity basis. The R-32/

R-125 mixture also had a lower pressure drop than R-22. The mixture R-134a(90%) I R-32(10%) had the lowest heat

transfer coefficients at both 4C and -2C when compared on both an equal mass flux and an equal cooling capacity basis.

In addition, this same mixture had the highest pressure drop. Except for the lowest performing refrigerant, all of the

refrigerants performed either similar or better than R-22. Also of special note, all of the refrigerants had larger heat

transfer coefficients at 4C than at -2C.

480

REFE RENC ES

Eckels, S.J. and M.B. Pate. "In-tube evaporation and conden

sation of refrigerants -lubricant mixtures of HFC-134a and

CFC-12." ASHR AE Transactions 97-2 (1991).

Private communications withE I. DuPont de Nemours & Compa

ny, Inc, (1993).

Doerr, T., S.J. Eckels, and M.B. Pate. "In-tube condensation

heat transfer of refrigerant mixtures." ASHR AE

Transactions, June meeting, Orlando, Florida (1994).

Bivens, D.B, A. Yokozeki, V.Z. Geller, M.E. Paulaitis. "Trans

port properties and heat transfer of alternatives for R502

and R-22" ASHRAE/NIST Refrigerants Conference, August 1993.

Financial support for this project was provided by E.I. DuPont

de Nemours & Company, Inc. The assitance of D.B.

Bivens and A. Yokozeki ofDuP ont in developing the program

concept and evaluating test results is greatly appreciated.

i Ch,t,e~

:<-502 [

1./o.;;,~/C:Iycol I,

: S torc.ge Ta..nk :

I

'

I~

i low

,'1e~er

I

I

A~CUr10.lo.

'

Oil

Cr.c.rg~ng

: Sto. -,;ion

tor

Ref~-'"':gernnt

, =-,t-:er I

i__!

'-

,0"'

481

o~

legond

1-~

u_

n 22

"

MIX1UAE I

fo.AIXTUnE 2

MIXriJF'IE 3

MIXl"Um:t

MIXTUtlE 5

00

IL

Ill

a:

'"

u.

...;:j~

"'

06

04

02 -

300

200

100

MASS

Figure l

<00

ru IX (kiJI!;:m~2)

o4

I2

D

h

leoond

R-22

Ml><runE 1

MIXTIJRE 2

MIXTURE 3

1.0

MIXTUR~.

MIXTURE 5

oe

0,6

0.4

02

"10"

legem!

12

"

n22

;. .ux.Tune'

MIXTURE 2

I0

"

MIXTURE 3

MIXT\Jn~ 4

MIXTUR~

/

/

/

/

/

/llo

00

/

/

/

~/

0.6

0.4

02

00

100

200

~ASS

300

400

500

rt.lJX (1<1JISIIIA2)

482

"10 ~

~-----------------------------

--------,

12 -

'0 -

oa

06 -

o .

Ll!gond

(]

R22

MIXTURE 1

02

MIXTURE 2

MIXTURE 3

MIXTURE~

MIXTURES

50r-------------~-------------------------

--------------------,

- Alfred-Almond CSD Building 5002Uploaded byphisitlai
- Energy Simulation in Buiding DesignUploaded byDustin White
- Heater Air ConditionerUploaded byCostiSimionescu
- Designing of Cold Stores and Choosing of Cooling System ElementsUploaded bymarzola699
- Introduction 15-03-14Uploaded byaj_ee_n293
- Earth Air Tunnel ParameterUploaded bySubrato Nath
- Thermal EngineeringUploaded byDaniel Ayala
- technical report（tck)Uploaded byTan Chun Keat
- Ashrae Revision 2005 to 2008Uploaded byWilfredo Nool Madronio
- Dowtherm HT Product BrochureUploaded byTahir Mahmood
- VessFire Offshore Technology White PaperUploaded byMahesh
- Forster PaperUploaded bySaif Evony
- How Does Basic Refrigeration Cycle WorkUploaded byIsmael Llamelo Perez
- Fabrication Of Air Conditioner Integrated With Water Cooler And Water HeaterUploaded byEditor Ijasre
- SI Heat 5e Chap01 Lecture FormattedUploaded by張仁佑
- AHRI Groundwater AssessmentUploaded byMaxmore Karumamupiyo
- Thermal Efficiency of Building ClustersUploaded byAbu Talha Farooqi
- RER Primer White PaperUploaded byBasil Oguaka
- Chapter 1 IntroductionUploaded byRenu Sekaran
- Heat TransferUploaded byMosab Mohamed Ahmed
- Report_NO._79-4[1]Uploaded bybmaych
- jutnalUploaded byArifRahman
- Energy%20in%20the%20BalanceUploaded bytigin
- Lecture notes on basic principle of heat and mas transferUploaded byMeruert Karim
- HeatTransferSystemsCalculation.pdfUploaded byjoshua surbakti
- Muscle Temperature Transients Before, During, And After ExerciseUploaded byAnonymous ZSmSZErTqt
- Gas–Solid Flow and Heat Transfer in Fluidized Beds With Tubes Effects of Material Properties and Tube Array SettingsUploaded byShahabuddin Suzan
- jergRefUploaded byAce Miadz
- Effect of Furniture and Partitions on the Surface Temperatures in an Office Under Forced FlowUploaded byhaschere
- Grade 6 Science Practice (SPK School)Uploaded byDita Listyani Pribadi SDK Banda

- Heat Load CalculationUploaded byGourang Paul
- 139675955-HVAC-Heat-LoadUploaded byMajid Roshani
- 270179477 Air Handling UnitUploaded byMajid Roshani
- 111104086-Air-Handling-Unit.pdfUploaded byMajid Roshani
- NB_AHUUploaded bySMBEAUTY
- Daikin Fan CoilsUploaded bySMBEAUTY
- Artigo8Uploaded byMajid Roshani
- 10Uploaded byMajid Roshani
- ECPEN13-410_Fan Coil Units With BLDC Technology_UK Version_tcm511-291488Uploaded byMajid Roshani
- Evaporating Heat Transfer of R22 and R410A in 9.52 Mm Smooth AndUploaded byMajid Roshani
- تهویه تونلی و محاسباتUploaded byMajid Roshani

- CHAPTER 1 AUploaded byFatinnnnnn
- 11. Air ConditioningUploaded byMohammed Ahmed Khan
- Mass and Heat Transfer Analysis of Mass Cont Actors and Heat Ex Changers (Cambridge Series in Chemical Engineering)Uploaded byKaliyaram Viswambaram
- HVAC Mid Exam ReviewUploaded byvoch007
- [2] Inverse geometric optimization for geometry of nanofluid-cooled microchannel heat sink.pdfUploaded byAhmadFaiz
- Passive and Active Building Energy SystemsUploaded byMrigya Gupta
- Solar Chimney2Uploaded byanujsadani
- 21712_04a.pdfUploaded byGaettan Katamba
- rir-ifas.pdfUploaded byAwanish singh
- Application of CNT Nanofluids in a Turbulent HEUploaded byKhalid Siddiqui
- Heat Transfer Inquiry LabUploaded byAnis
- JNIN-7RMNRX_R0_EN.pdfUploaded byFELIXDEJ
- CHE463_180_533 (1)Uploaded byFarah Mustapha
- heat flux sensorsUploaded byskanya93
- ASHRAE Symposium AC-02!9!2 Cooling Tower Model-Hydeman & TaylorUploaded bysajuhere
- Shading Device Design AlternativeUploaded byTokamanis Harris
- Heat Super FinalUploaded byolescoot
- 1-s2.0-S1364032116304361-main(1).pdfUploaded byMuhammad Hashir Muhammad Hashir
- Charging and Td Chart PlusUploaded byFaquruddin Ali
- Thermal analysis of Helical Baffle in Heat ExchangerUploaded byIjsrnet Editorial
- Table of Contents-Heat Transfer Calculations-Myer KutzUploaded bypvr2k1
- design exp3 final hthcv 9th team7Uploaded byapi-452435135
- Fouling FactorsUploaded byprasw
- Lecture 5Uploaded byAvinnaash Suresh
- Heat Load Calculation PsychometricUploaded byahmaborashed
- ME259LectureSlides2.pptUploaded byFan Yang
- HVAC Cooling Load Procedure Guideline Lo0Uploaded byapi-3858025
- HMT EME504 Lession PlanUploaded bystkmrt007
- FenestrationUploaded byDaniel Gnanaselvam
- Chapter03.pdfUploaded byymailio