You are on page 1of 6
Test report No. 161 22335/1.2.0 e Date of report Customer Order Specimen Contents Ulster Prot Dipl Ing dose Sch ‘Teodor Git Si, P5 tones Resenhe Fenster Tiren @ Fassaden Werkstoffe Zubehor ROSENHEIM 15 december 1999 SCHUCO International KG Karolinenstrae 1-15 D-33609 Bielefeld Determination of the airborne sound insulation of a facade _ element with fixed glazing according to the German standard DIN 52210 and DIN EN ISO 717-1 (Aptitude testing I for DIN 4109) Facade element with fixed glazing of the product designation FW 60™ 1. Definition of task 2 Test specimen 3 Test procedure 4 Test results 5 Information for use of Lf.t. test reports — Measurement sheet (1 page) ‘Annex (1 page) ‘Telefon (0 80 31) 261-0, ‘Sparkasse Rosenteim: ee Teletar (08031) 261.200 fo 38 2 (82 111 50000) ‘mall Ino@itrocarnom do Pocscheckamt Munch: Iitpaltwreaitosento se Kio, 2849 26-80" (BLZ 700100 60) DaP-F00808-0+97.00, Page 20f4 ° Test report 161 22335/1.2.0e of 15 december 1999 Company _ SCHUCO International KG, D-33609 Bielefeld ROSENHEIM 1 Definition of task The if. Rosenheim was charged by SCHUCO International KG, D-33609 Bielefeld, to determine the airborne sound insulation according to DIN 52210 and DIN EN ISO 717-1 of a facade element with fixed glazing of the product designation .FW 60™. This test serves for the evidence of aptitude for the requirements stated in DIN 4109 (aptitude test 1) 2 Test specimen Specimen Facade element System name Fweo" Frame material Aluminium profile with thermal break, untreated surface Frame Exterior dimensions 1230 mm x 1480 mm Mullion cross-section 150,5mm x= 60mm Transom cross-section 126,5mm x 60mm Glazing Insulating glass unit Designation / Type Phonstop 36/42 Visible pane dimensions 1110 mm x 1360 mm Pane construction 42/20/4 (mm) Total thickness: 36 mm Filling in pane space 47% Asgon, 12% SF, (according to if.t. analysis) Glass sealing exterior and interior with sealing profiles Vapour pressure balance __ by profiles in mullions The facade element with fixed glazing can be seen in cross-section in the measurement sheet and in the annex, ‘Specimen collection Production of the specimens by the customer regarding the necessary dimensions. Delivery of specimen 29 november 1999 Date of test 30 november 1999 3. Test procedure The test specimen was mounted into the test opening of the partition wall of the window test rig P-F according to DIN 52210-02:1984 using a mounting frame which was weighted with lead. It was butt jointed as prescribed for installation type 2, it was wedged and secured and was opened and closed several times. The connecting joints were completely stuffed with plastic foam and sealed on both sides with plastic sealant of type Perennator 2001 S grey. Page 30f4 ® Test report 161 22336/1.3.0e of 15 december 1999 Company _ SCHUCO International KG, D-33609 Bielefeld ROSENHEIM For measuring the airborne sound insulation a test noise was generated using a dodecahedron loudspeaker in the source room. With a two-channel measurement system for building acoustics the sound level difference between the sound level L, in the source room and the sound level L, in the receiving room was measured at least at two positions of the loudspeakers according to DIN 52210-1:1984-08. The microphones automatically moved through the room on a circular path. Two measurements of the reverberation were carried out in the receiving room using two positions of loudspeaker and microphone each. The reverberation times T were achieved by taking the arithmetic average. The equivalent area of absorption A is calculated using the volume V of the receiving room as follows: A=0,63 x m From the measurement values and the test area S of the test specimen the sound reduction index R is calculated following the function: s R=L,-L,+10-lg> dB 2 las The measurement was carried out using the following equipment: Apparatus Type Producer Integrating measurement device Type Nortronic 840 —_Norsonic-Tippkemper Microphone-preamplifier Type 1201 Norsonic-Tippkemper Microphone Type 1220 Norsonic-Tippkemper Pistonphone Type 4220 Briel & Kjeer Loudspeaker dodecahedron Type 228,96 Ohm —_Norsonic-Tippkemper Amplifier Type 235,100 W _Norsonic-Tippkemper Rotating microphone Type 231-N-360 _Norsonic-Tippkemper In three year intervals the i.f.1. attends to comparing measurements at the Physikalisch- Technische Bundesanstalt (Federal institution for physical-technical affairs) at Braun- schweig. The sound level meter of the acoustic measurement system is regularly calibrated at the Eichamt (Office of weights and measures) at Dortmund. The complete measuring arrangement is calibrated at the beginning of a sound level measurement. The if. Rosenheim is included as no. “BAY 18" into the “list of bodies for testing, surveillance and certification according to the land’s building directive” issued by the DIBt. 4 Test results 4.1. Tested and calculated values The values of the measured airborne sound reduction index of the tested facade element with fixed glazing are drawn-up in the diagram of the annexed data sheet as a function of the frequency and are given in the following table: xmaurirrsRovexTevonzzies@23361306 dor Page ofa e Test report 161 22335/1.20e of 15 december 1999 Company _ SCHUCO Intemational KG, D-33609 Bielefeld OO ROSENHEIM finkz | 50 63 80 | 100 125 160 | 200 250 315 | 400 500 _630 RindB | 37,1 31,8 326| 27,1 293 22,4 | 256 297 345] 379 41,2 41,2 finHz | 800 1000 1250 | 1600 2000 2500 | 3150 4000 _5000 RindB | 401 409 419/458 481 480| 456 47.3 506 From that the weighted sound reduction index Ry according to DIN EN ISO 717-1: 1997-01 can be calculated for the frequency range from 100 Hz to 3150 and the spectrum adaption terms C and Cy: Ry (CiC,) = 44 (-2;-6) dB According to DIN EN ISO 717-1:1997-01 further spectrum adaptation terms result from that Ceosiso -2 dB Creo.s000. -1 dB Ceosooo = -1 dB 6 0B Cysoos00 = -6 dB Crsosoo = -6 dB Cy soaso For the evidence of aptitude according to DIN 4109 is valid: Tested value Rw, 41dB and _— calculated value Ry, =39dB The characteristic values Ry» and Ry» as well as the required margin between laboratory measurements and in-situ measurements (2 dB) correspond to DIN 4109 : 1989-11. 42 Vali ity of test results The values given in this test report are only valid for the specimen described in item 2. General conclusions for the construction and other functional details may not be drawn from this test report. 5 Information for use of i.f.t. test reports Regulations for the use of test reports are given in the enclosed information sheet Conditions and information for use of if. test reports for publication and commercial purposes" i.f.t, Rosgfieim 15 dece¢nbgr 1999 (9. Dept. Sound insulation Dr. Rolf Schumacher Sound insulation index acc. to DIN 52210 - 3 Customer: SCHUCO International KG, D-33609 Bielefeld Aptitude testing I for DIN 4109 Test ace. to DIN §2210-03-E1-L-P.F-2 Date of test 30 november 1999 Areaoftest —1,25mx 1,50 m= 1,88 m2 Laboratory _Tworleaf conerete wall, partion wall DIN §2210-2: 1984 Testnoise Pink noise Volumes of Vs = 109,93 testrooms — Ve= 101,33 Max possible Rwmax = 62.48 sound reduction (related to test area) Mounting Window builtin butt jointed to test- conditions opening and secured with wedges, Connecting joints completely stuffed with plastic foam and sealed with plastic seatants on both sides. Rua = Rye — 2 dB Weighted sound reduction indices Ry, Tested value Rup 1 dB (according to if.t. analysis) gram Rif) Calculated value Rye = 3948 Specimen Facade element with fixed glazing Frame material Aluminium profile for facades Window system FW 60" Dimensions 1230 mm x 1480 mm Glazing Insulating glass unit Phonstop 36/42 Pane construction 12/20/4 (mm) Filling in space 47% Argon, 12% SF curve of reference —— measurement curve 60 50 ing sound index R in 4B 40 30 20 10 125250 500 1000 2000 Frequency f in Hz Test report No.: 161 22335/1.2.0 6 i.f.t, Rosenheim, 15 december 1999 fad of testing Wha Dr. Rolf Schumacher ROSENHEIM, ‘Annex Page 1 of 1 @ Test report 161 22335/1.2.0e of 16 december 1999 Company _ SCHUCO international KG, D-33609 Bielefeld ROSENHEIM Soe} Note ‘This annex was composed using documents of the customer. There was no complete examination for technical conectness. usaurnnrsenovexrenstcznszzsastae doc