Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KITAB UL FARAIDH
NOTES AND EXPLANATION MUHAMMAD NABEEL MUSHARRAF
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION: ............................................................................................................................... 2
ABOUT THIS BOOKLET: ......................................................................................................... 2
WHO IS THIS BOOKLET FOR: ............................................................................................... 2
Stay tuned for our upcoming book (InshaAllah): ................................................................. 2
ABOUT THE SUBJECT: ............................................................................................................ 2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND SOURCES: ................................................................................... 3
RECOMMENDED TEXTS TO STUDY WITH THIS BOOK:.......................................................... 4
A SINCERE REQUEST: ....................................................................................................................... 4
EXPLANATION OF AHADITH: ....................................................................................................... 5
A DUA AND AN EXPRESSION OF OUR FEELINGS ................................................................. 28
INTRODUCTION:
ABOUT THIS BOOKLET:
-
This document is a part of a bigger project that is aimed at integrating all the ahadith
on the topic of Ilm ul Faraidh (Islamic laws of inheritance) and summarizing the
rulings derived from them.
This document is neither intended to cover all the details regarding Ilm ul Faraidh nor
meant to be sufficient on its own. Accordingly, we have not defined many of the
terms used in this booklet. However, they will be adequately explained in the
complete book (inshaAllah).
The English language commentaries for Jami Tirmidhi are not very common. It
leaves students with very limited options if they do not have a grip on Arabic or
another language. In order to bridge this gap, we have prepared this commentary
which incorporate explanations from various sources.
Providing a clear explanation of the verses from the Quran, relevant ahadith, and the
practices of the companions with regard to the distribution of inheritance (and laws
driven from these)
Presenting a detailed overview of the extensions to the law made by the fuqaha with
regards to the situations not seen till the time of the companions and where they
agree or differ with each other
Introducing a VERY EASY approach towards calculating the shares of inheritance
Presenting a comparative review of inheritance laws in various religions
Providing an overview of relevant legislative aspects in selected countries
Publisher: Australian Islamic Library (InshaAllah)
Typewritten Arabic text and translation from Sunnah.com (sourced from Dar us
Salam) Caution: Some errors or ambiguous sentence structures are found in the translation
available from Dar us Salam e.g. Hadith no. 2237.
A huge collection of books on this subject can be found at Australian Islamic Librarys
website, under the section of Fiqh.
Website Address: http://www.australianislamiclibrary.org/fiqh1.html
A SINCERE REQUEST:
We have tried our best to avoid any mistakes in this book in terms of interpretations,
language, and expression. However, we accept our weakness and request you to highlight
any mistakes to us so that they can be corrected.
EXPLANATION OF AHADITH:
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2233 (Grade: Hasan)
:
"
"
.
.
.
Translation:
Abu Hurairah R.A. narrated thatthe Messenger of Allah said:
"Whoever leaves wealth, then it isfor his heirs, and whoever leavespoor dependants then it
(theresponsibility) is for me."
Abu 'Eisa said: This Hadith is Hasan Saheeh. Az-Zuhri reported it longer and more
complete than this from Abu Salamah from Abu Hurairah from the Prophet .
There are other narrations on this topic from Jabir and Anas, and the wording " "means
'wretched', i.e. a person who has nothing. For such a person, the prophet said that the
responsibility in such a case to take responsibility and spend on them lies with the prophet
.
Key points:
-
The state is responsible for assisting the poor who are not able to cater for their needs
and do not receive much in inheritance
If the legal heirs are available, the state does not forcefully acquire the estate
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2234-2235 (Grade: Daif)
:
"
.
. "
Translation:
Abu Hurairah narrated that the Messenger of Allah said: "Learn the laws of inheritance
and the Qur'an, and teach the people, for I am a mortal." (Daif)
Abu Eisa said: There is Idtirab (i.e. a type of weakness in which the hadith is narrated in
different wording by different narrators) in this Hadith.
Note:
The hadith Hadith 2235 in Book 29 of Jami At-Tirmidhi explains further insights about the
weakness of this hadith and explain that the narrator Muhammad bin Qasim Al-Asadi is
graded as weak by Imam Ahmed Ibn Hanbal and other Muhaditheen.
Key points:
-
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2236 (Grade: Daif)
:
. "
"
"
. "
.
Translation:
"The wife of Sa'd bin Ar-Rabie came with her two daughters from Sa'd to the Messenger of
Allah and said: O Messenger of Allah !These two are daughters of Sa'd bin Ar-Rabi who
fought along with you on the day of Uhud and was martyred. Their uncle took their wealth,
without leaving any wealth for them, and they will not be married unless they have wealth.
He said: 'Allah will decide on that matter. The ayah about inheritance was revealed.
So the Messenger of Allah sent (the command) to their uncle saying: Give the two
daughters of Sa'd two thirds, and give their mother one eighth, and whatever remains, then
it is for you.'
Key points:
-
If there are two daughters, they will receive 2/3rd in the estate. This is in case there is
no son.
In case, there are daughters, wife receives 1/8th of the estate.
The uncle (fathers brother) becomes the residual heir in such a case.
For example, his share in this case was as follows:
1 (full estate) share of daughters (2/3) share of wife (1/8) = 1/8
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2237 (Grade: Sahih)
:
.
.
Translation:
A man came to Abu Musa and Salman bin Rabiah and asked them about
-
a daughter () ,
a son's daughter (
) , and a
a haqeeqi sister (
)
So they said: For the daughter is half, for the haqeeqi sister is what remains.' And they said to
him: Go to Abdullah (bin Masud) and ask him, for surely he will concur with us.'
So he went to 'Abdullah mentioning that to him and informing him what they had said.
'Abdulah said: 'If I give such a ruling, then I would have erred and not been among the
rightly-guided (on the matter). Rather, I will judge as the Messenger of Allah judged:
-
It is explained about this hadith that the opinion of Abu Musa and Salman bin
Rabiah was apparently based on the following nusoos (injunctions from the book and
the sunnah):
o Firstly, the share of the daughter (if she is the only one among the offsprings
of the deceased) is half
o Secondly, it is mentioned in the ayah about kalalah, that if a person dies
without any offsprings ( )and has a sister, than the sister gets the half. It is
possible that these companions would have considered the meaning walad to
be male offsprings only (as it was commonly used in Arabic proverbs at that
time)
o Thirdly, there is no prescribed share for the granddaughters in the Quran.
These companions made their ijtihad based on the Quran. However, when they came
to know about the Sunnah in this regard through Abdullah Ibn Masood R.A. (who
they considered more knowledgeable about this aspect than themselves, as evident
from the text of the hadith), they changed their opinion and aligned it with the
Sunnah of the messenger of Allah ( based on explanations provided in Tuhfa tul
Ahwadhi and Mirqat ul Mafateeh).
.
Hadith Reference:
( :
Translation:
Al-Harith narrated that 'Ali said: You recite this Ayah:
[and
misunderstand it that the wassiyah has to be paid before the debt]. And the Messenger of
Allah indeed judged the debt before the will, and that the children (sons and daughters)
from the same mother and father inherit [from each other], not the sons from various
mothers. The man inherits from his brother from his father, and his mother, [and] not his
brother from his father."
Another narration also conveys the same meaning.
Key points:
-
Debts are to be settled before the distribution of the estate according to the wassiyyah
(if it meets the associated legal requirements)
Children from same father and mother inherit from each other
Children from a different father or mother do not inherit from each other [in the
presence of children from the same mother and father]
.
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2240 (Grade: Hasan)
:
.
.
.
Translation:
The Messenger of Allah judged that the children (sons and daughters) from the same
mother and father inherit, not the sons from various mothers.'
[Abu 'Eisa said:] We do not know of this Hadith except through the narration of Abu Isbaq
Children from same father and mother [haqeeqi siblings] inherit from each other
Children from a different father or mother do not inherit from each other in the
presence of haqeeqi siblings.
Note:
In the terminology of Ilm Al Faraidh, the children or offsprings can be divided in
three categories:
Same mother,different
father
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2241 (Grade: Hasan)
:
( :
.
.
. )
Translation:
Jabir Ibn Abdullah R.A. said that the Messenger of Allah came to visit me while I was ill at
(i.e., to the male, a portion equal to that of two females.)
[Abu 'Eisa said:] This Hadith is Hasan Sahih. [Shu'bah and] Ibn 'Uyainah and others
reported it from Muhammad bin Al-Munkadir, from Jabir, may Allah be pleased with him.
Key points:
-
It is important to explain here that the ayah of Surah An-Nisa (Quran 4:11) mentioned
in this hadith (as revealed in relation Jabir R.A.s situation) is also reported to have
been revealed regarding the situation of the daughters of Saad Ibn Rabi (e.g. Sunan
Abi Dawud 2891 Hasan). Moreover, in some narrations, it is mentioned that the
ayah revealed in this situation was that of Kalalah rather than the one mentioned in
this hadith (e.g. Book 29, Hadith 2242 Saheeh). The mohaditheen have given two
explanations regarding this. Hafiz Ibn Hajar A-Asqalani explain that the wording
known from Jabir R.A. is that ayah of inheritance was revealed for his situation
with no further specific about which ayah. Imam Ibn Hajar explains that the
specification about one of the two ayahs is attributed to the interpreters and
transmitters1. According to the second opinion, both the ayahs ere revealed in his
case2; however, what was closely relevant to his case was the ayah about the kalalah.
This narration is different from a number of other narrations about this event (in
Saheeh Bukhari3, Saheeh Muslim4, Sunan Abu Dawud5, and Sunan Ibn Majah6) due
to the following reason. Some of the relevant narrations mention about Jabir R.A.s
sisters7 [where their share in inheritance was the consideration]. However, the
wording in this narration seems to be unique in a way that in this he is reported to
have asked about how to distribute his wealth among his offsprings (which he did
not have any). We can accordingly consider the wording of other narrations to be
more accurate as opposed to the wording of this single narration (which is classified
This is applicable for both the narrations about this event in Saheeh Buhari (No. 6723 and 6743)
This opinion is supported by Hadith 2832in Sunan Ibn Majah which mentions both the narrations
for this event.
3 Sahih al-Bukhari 6723
4 Sahih Muslim 1616
5 Sunan Abi Dawud 2886, Sunan Abi Dawud 2887
6 Hadith 2832
7 Sahih al-Bukhari 6743, Hadith 2242
1
2
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2242 (Grade: Sahih)
:
( :
.
.
.
)
Translation:
"I was ill, so the Messenger of Allah came to visit me and found me unconscious. He came
walking, while Abu Bakr and 'Umar were with him. The Messenger of Allah performed
Wudu, then poured the remaining water on me, so I came to my senses. I said: 'O Messenger
of Allah !How shall I dispose off my wealth?' - or - 'What shall I do with my wealth?' He
did not reply anything to me [at that time]. He [i.e. Jabir R.A.] had nine sisters. [The prophet
did not reply] "until the Ayah about the inheritance was revealed:
They ask you for a legal verdict. Say: "Allah directs (thus) about Al-Kalalah."
Jabir R.A. said: "It was revealed regarding me."
Key points:
-
The guidelines about the matters of inheritance about the kalalah are available in the
verse pointed out in this hadith. Kalalah is defined as someone who neither has
ascendants nor descendants (as interpreted by the mohaditheen9).
The Qur'anic Verse makes it clear that if a person dies and leaves behind neither
parents nor children, but a single (real) sister, then the sister shall inherit half of his
wealth. In case the sisters are more than one, they shall get a share of two-third of his
wealth. If there is a brother in addition to the sister as well, the brother shall get twice
8
9
"
"
Translation:
"Give the shares of inheritance to those who are entitled to them. As for what remains, then
it is for the closest male relative.'
Key points:
-
The hadith also establishes the basis of priority in male residual heirs based on the
closeness of their relationship with the deceased.
It is also pointed out that from among the residual heirs, the closest male relative gets
the residual share. So there has to be a level of prioritization among the residual heirs
and it is not expected that the residual estate would be distributed among them
equally or in some proportion. The closest relative blocks all others after him from
receiving any shares from the inheritance.
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2245 (Grade: Daif)
:
" . " " . "
"
. . "
Translation:
A man came to the Prophet and said: 'My son died, so what do I inherit from him?'
He said: 'For you is a sixth.' When he turned to leave,he called him and said: 'For you is
another sixth.' So when he turned to leave , he called him saying: 'The last sixth is
consumable for you.'
In the explanation of this hadith, the Muhaditheen explain that the first 1/6 was the
right of the grandfather as one of the Zawil Furoodh (i.e those whose shares have been
specifically explained). The second 1/6 was as an Asaba (i.e. the residual heir), as in
this case, the deceased had two daughters (who received 2/3rd) and he had no sons.
The two shares (of 1/6 each) were given to him with a gap to ensure that people do
not think that the right of father is 1/3 (whereas 1/3 in this case was because of two
separate one sixths.)
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2246 (Grade: Sahih)
:
.
.
. .
.
Translation:
A grandmother - the mother of a mother, or the mother of a father - came to Abu Bakr and
she said: 'a son of my son' - or, 'a son of my daughter died, and I have been informed that
there is a right (from the wealth) for me in the Book.' So Abu Bakr said: 'I do not find that
there is a right for you in the Book, and I haven't heard that the Messenger of Allah judged
anything for you [regarding such a matter]. I shall ask the people.' So, Al-Mughirah bin
Shu'bah testified that the Messenger of Allah gave her (case) a sixth. He said: 'And who
heard that along with you?' He said: 'Muhammad bin Maslamah." He said: "So he gave her a
sixth. Then the other grandmother who was left behind came to 'Umar." Sufyan said: "And
Ma'mar said to me, in addition, from Az-Zuhri - and I do not remember it to be from AZuhri, rather I remember it to be from Ma'mar - that 'Umar said: 'If the two of you are [alive]
together [at the time of distribution of the estate] then it is for both of you, and whichever of
you is alone with it (the sixth), then it is for her.'
Key points:
-
Paternal and maternal grandmothers are entitled to 1/6th of the estate. If both of
Translation:
A grandmother came to Abu Bakr to ask him about her inheritance. He said to her, 'There is
nothing for you in the Book of Allah and there is nothing for you in the Sunnah of the
Messenger of Allah . So ,return until I ask the people. So he asked the people and AlMughirah bin Shu'bah said: 'I was present when the Messenger of Allah gave her (case) a
sixth.' So he said: 'Was anyone else with you?' Muhammad bin Maslamah stood to say the
same as what Al-Mughirah bin Shu'bah said. So Abu Bakr implemented that for her." Then
the other grandmother came to 'Umar bin Al-Khattab to ask him about her inheritance. He
said: 'There is nothing in the Book of Allah for you, but there is that sixth. So if the two of
you are together then it is for both of you, and whichever of you remains), then it is for her.'"
Key points:
-
Paternal and maternal grandmothers are entitled to 1/6th of the estate. If both of
them are alive, then they share it among them. If not, whoever is alive, she takes all
of the 1/6th.
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2248 (Grade: Daif)
:
Translation:
The Messenger of Allah gave the first grandmother, along with her son, a sixth for them to
consume while her son was living.
[Abu 'Eisa said:] We do not know of this hadith to be Marfu' except through this route. Some
of the Companions of the Prophet gave the grandmother, along with her son inheritance,
and some of them did not give her inheritance.
Key points:
-
In the opinion of Ibn Mas'ud, 'Umar, and Abu Musa Ash'ari, even in the presence of
the deceased person's father, the grandmother would be the recipient of inheritance.
Qadi Shuraih, Hasan and Ibn Sirin concur with this opinion.
Uthman, 'Ali, and Zaid bin Thabit , however, are of the view that in the given
situation [i.e. when the father of the deceased is alive], the grandmother would not
get anything from the deceased person's wealth. Imam Ishaq and Ahmad Ibn Hanbal
concur with Ibn Mas'ud's position while Imam Shfi'i, Ath-Thawri, Al-Awza'i are in
agreement with the view held by 'Uthman .
The opinion of the majority of the fuqaha in this regard is that in the presence of
father of the deceased, grandmother would not inherit. They present the following
reasons for their opinion:
It may be possible that the father of the deceased would have been ineligible
to receive inheritance (e.g. a non-believer, a murderer, a slave etc.)
The share that is mentioned in this hadith could be out of mutual agreement
and as an Ihsan (which is allowed if all heirs agree on terms and amounts of
distribution)
This reference could be for maternal grandmother (as the same word is used
for both the grandmothers) and she could have been given the inheritance in
the presence of her son.
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2249 (Grade: Hasan)
:
"
.
.
. "
Translation:
" 'Umar bin Al-Khattab sent me with a letter to Abu'Ubaidah (saying) that The Messenger of
Allah(S.A.W) said : 'Allah and His Messenger are responsible for the one who has no patron.
And the maternal uncle inherits from the one who has no heirs.'"
Key points:
-
According to this hadith, maternal uncles belong to a group of heirs called zawil
Arham. This group neither has prescribed shares (unlike Zawil Furoodh) nor do they
become a residual heirs (unlilke Asabah). This group can only receive shares in
inheritance when zawil furoodh and asaba are not alive or are not illegible to become
heirs (as highlighted in this hadith).
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2250 (Grade: Hasan)
:
"
. "
Translation:
" 'Umar bin Al-Khattab sent me with a letter to Abu'Ubaidah (saying) that The Messenger of
Allah(S.A.W) said : 'Allah and His Messenger are responsible for the one who has no patron.
And the maternal uncle inherits from the one who has no heirs.'"
Key points:
-
This hadith, though it has a few weaknesses in some of the chains of transmission,
also reinforces the point mentioned in the previous hadith, i.e. maternal uncles )who
belong to zawil arham) inherit when zawil furoodh and asaba are not present or none of
them is eligible.
With regards to the inclusion of maternal aunt and paternal aunt in the zawil arham,
Among the four schools of thought, hanafis and hanbalis consider zawil arham to be
the heirs whereas shafiis and malikis do not consider them to be the heirs.
Those who consider zawil arham to be the heirs cite the following to support their
opinion:
It is also found in a hadith where the inheritance was given to the nephew
who is neigther among zawil furoodh nor among the asaba. This, accordingly,
also indicates that a third category of heirs does exist (which is classified by
scholars as zawil arham).
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2251 (Grade: Hasan)
:
"
" . . "
. "
.
Translation:
'Aishah narrated that a freed slave of the Prophet fell from foilage on a date-palm and
died. So the Prophet said: "See if he has any heirs." They said: "No." He said: "Pay it to
someone among the people of the town."
Key points:
-
Those who free the slaves can inherit from them in certain cases (Al-Mughni, v.9,
p.215). But as the Prophets of Allah do not inherit any money or wealth from anyone,
the Messenger of Allah took nothing from whatever was left behind by his freed
This hadith also explains that in similar situations, the estate has to go to the needy
people of ones town.
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2252 (Grade: Hasan)
:
.
Translation:
Ibn 'Abbas R.A. narrated that a man died during the time of the Messenger of Allah and
he did not leave any heirs except for a slave that he had freed. So the Prophet gave him his
inheritance. [Abu 'Elsa said:] This Hadlth is Hasan. What is acted upon regarding this topic according to the people of knowledge - is that when a man dies and he leaves no relatives
behind, then his inheritance is placed into the Muslims' Bayt Al-Mal.
Key points:
-
Qadi Shuraih and Tawus hold the view that, if the master has not left behind any
heir except for a slave whom he had freed, then the freed slave will get his
inheritance just as the master inherits the freed slave, if the latter leaves behind no
heirs. But the view of the majority of the fuqaha is that in such a case the inheritance
shall go to Bait Al-Maal (public treasury of a Muslim state), as explained in Tuhfat AlAhwadhi. The ulema who recommend for the estate to be deposited in the bayt al maal
(in such a situation) explain that for the cases such as the one mentioned in this
hadith, the freed slave was given a share in inheritance because he was needy and
deserving.
It can be said that the needy and the poor who are closer to the deceased should be
considered first at the time of distribution of estate. In another situation (as
mentioned in the previous hadith i.e. Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2251),
when the deceased did not leave any heirs (nor a deserving free slave), the estate was
distributed to the people of the town of the deceased as they were deserving and
closer to the deceased.
Hadith Reference:
)Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2253 (Grade: Saheeh
:
" .
"
.
.
.
" .
"
Translation:
said: "The Muslim does not inherit Usamah bin Zaid narrated that the Messenger of Allah
]from the disbeliever, nor the disbeliever from the Muslim. " [Sahih
(The rest of the discussion in the text about this hadith deals with various chains which is
)beyond the scope of the current topic.
Key points:
We learn from this hadith that the Muslims and non-Muslims cannot inherit from
each other. This aspect is further explained with the next hadith.
Hadith Reference:
)Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2254 (Grade: Saheeh
:
" .
"
Translation:
" The people of two religions do not inherit from each other." This hadith is ghareeb and we
People from any Millah (Arabic: - a group following the same religion or a
group that is considered to be one entity based on some aspect) inherit only from
their own millah or group. Many of the jurists and scholars from the shafiis, hanafis,
and hanbalis consider the disbelievers to be one group and say that .
Therefore, according to them, all disbelievers can inherit from each other irrespective
of their religion as they are one millah because of kufr which is a common factor
among them). This is the explanation provided by Imam Ibn Al Hajr Asqalani n Fath
ul Bari. However, the view of Imam Malik is that and he accordingly
considers each religion to be a separate millah. By this interpretation, Jews and
Christians (and people of other faiths) cannot inherit from each other, but only from
the people of their own faith.
In modern days, those who do not adhere to any faith can also be considered a millah
and can be treated as a separate millah.
With regards to apostates ( ), it is an ijma of the fuqaha that they do not inherit
from the Muslims. However, there is a difference of opinion regarding if Muslims
can receive the inheritance from the apostates. Imam Malik and many other scholars
believe that the Muslims do not inherit from the apostates. However, Hanafis (and
some other fuqaha) rule that the wealth that the apostates acquire during their time as
Muslims would be inherited whereas that which they acquired after irtidad
(becoming apostate) will not be inherited by Muslims.
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2255 (Grade: Hasan)
:
"
. "
.
.
.
.
Translation:
Aba Hurairah R.A. narrated that the Prophet said: "The murderer will not inherit." [Abu
Scholars of religion are unanimous in their view that an intentional murderer will
not inherit from the victim. Similarly, most of the scholars hold the view that even
the person responsible for manslaughter will not inherit from the victim.
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2256 (Grade: Saheeh)
:
.
.
.
Translation:
'Umar said: 'The blood-money is upon the 'Aqilah, and the wife does not inherit anything
from the blood-money of her husband.' So Ad-Dahhak bin Sufyan Al-Kilabi informed him
that the Messenger of Allah wrote to him, [saying] to give the wife of Ashyam Ad-Dababi
the inheritance from her husband's blood-money.'
Key points:
-
Umer R.A. initially thought that the widows do not receive inheritance from the
blood-money of their husbands. However, after knowing the information mentioned
in this hadith, he changed his opinions. Now the fuqaha unanimously agree that the
deceased wife shall be the inheritor of her husband's blood-money.
The term Aqilah in this hadith refers to the members of a clan from the father's side
that are responsible for the payment of blood-money on behalf of the murderer.
However, according to a decision by Umer R.A., it is understood that other entities
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2257 (Grade: Saheeh)
:
.
Translation:
The Messenger of Allah judged in the case of a woman's fetus from Banu Libyan which
miscarried [because of a stone being hurled at her by another women] the a Gurrah male or
female slave be given to her. Then the woman about whom the Ghurah was judged Gurrah
herself died. So the Messenger of Allah judged that her inheritance was for her children
and her husband, and that her blood-money was on her 'Asabah.
Key points:
-
Giving a Ghurah slave in payment to the lady who had a miscarriage was prescribed
for the lady whose act resulted in the death of the fetus. This was to be paid by her
asaba.
Regarding rest of the hadith, there are various interpretations, as summarized below.
o
The women who had a miscarriage also died herself later on. In this case, her
inheritance was given to her heirs. Whereas, Asaba of the women whose
action resulted in the murder had to pay the blood-money.
In either case, we know that Asaba are required to pay the blood-money, however, if
there are any heirs because of them, there are no residuary shares of inheritance,
Asaba do not receive any share (as in this case).
As slaves do not exist any more, scholars have recommended that 1/20 of the whole
diyyah be paid by some whose action results in the death of fetus of any women.
Scholars have mentioned this amount to be 500 Dirhams.
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2258 (Grade: Hasan)
:
. "
"
. " "
Translation:
It is narrated from Tamim Ad-Dar R.A. who said: "I asked the Messenger of Allah ' What is
the Sunnah regarding a man among the people of who accepts Islam at the hand of a man
among the Muslims?' So the if Messenger of Allah said: 'He is the closest of the people to
him in his life and his death.'" (Hasan)
Key points:
-
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2259 (Grade: Hasan)
:
"
. "
.
Translation:
Inheritance between the father and his children is established through lineage. No
such relationship is established or recognized between the fornicator and his
illegitimate child in Islam. As such, neither of them can inherit from the other.
It is important to understand here that this ruling is regarding the child born out of
Zina and his or her biological father. Neither father (and his relatives) nor the child
born out of Zina (and his or her heirs) inherit from each other. Scholars explain that
this remains the case even if the fornicator marries the women with whom he did
Zina that led to the birth of the child.
However, the child and his or her mother can inherit from each other.
It is also important to clarify here that the child born out of wedlock, like every other
child, he or she is born sinless; it does not carry the stigma of the sin of the father or
mother or both. A basic principle in Islamic justice is that no one bears the blame for
anothers fault. A child born as a result of an illegitimate relationship suffers no
adverse discrimination on account of his parents sin.
Hadith Reference:
Jami At-Tirmidhi Book 29, Hadith 2260 (Grade: Daif)
:
. "
"
Translation:
The Messenger of Allah said: "The one who inherits the Wala is the one who inherits the
wealth."
Key points:
-
If a freed slave meets his death and leaves behind neither heirs nor 'Asabah, then his
inheritance shall go to the one who sets the slave free (if he or she is alive) or his or
her progeny (if he or she is not alive and if the progency consists of those who fall
under the category of asaba bi-nafsihi and are males).
. "
"
Translation:
The Messenger of Allah said: "The woman collects three inheritance: Whomever she freed,
whomever she found, and the child for which she made Li'an."
Key points:
-
In the first case, according to the majority of the companions and jurists, if a
woman frees a slave and he dies without leaving behind any legal heir or
'Asabah, then the woman shall inherit from him.
In the third case, if a father disowns the child through lian, then the ties of
inheritance between the child and that man break; however, the mother in
this case remains to be a heir.
Ya Allah! Ya Rabbana!