- Transportation Prob
- Minimization and Maximization
- functions.pdf
- Historical Reference Crop ET Reliable for Irrigation Scheduling During Summer
- Differentiation Booklet
- Optimization GRG_ Method
- Collection of formulas of Maths
- tc-47976272-20110124-20_11_20
- Final Exam Review Spring 2011
- Mathematics IV - Advanced Algebra - Activity Sheet
- calculus-cheat.pdf
- Applications of Differentiation Handout
- paper_on_GA
- liberatore2013.docx
- MCA 454 Java Lab Assignment 1
- Optim 1 Introduction 2016
- 2016 Review (in-Sun)
- CALCULUS HOMEWORK AM
- Assessing Error Bound For Dominant Point Detection
- Linear Programming
- 3.3 - 3.6 new skool calc BC.pdf
- Prob_1_1
- STUDY OF OPTIMIZATION WITH FUZZY CONSTRAINTS
- Nonlinear Model Predictive Control UAV
- Several Variable Calculus
- Project Presentation - Effective space optimization & time reduction in part feeding activity: An overview
- OA1_06_2011en
- 1-s2.0-S0038092X16305308-main
- Lecture Notes on Differentiation MATH161.pdf
- 22 912085
- ESE_2017-NOTIFICATION.pdf
- pso.txt
- ReadMe.txt
- Fem Convergence
- FEMConvergence.ppt
- GG711c_Lec_10.pdf
- Curves of Infinity Decode if Possible
- strain-gage-rosette-theory.pdf
- Machine Learning Testing Data
- ESE Reforms Publicity
- ESE-2015 CUT-OFF.pdf
- shape_functions_1d.doc
- ESE_2017_English_Notice.pdf
- FEMConvergence.ppt
- Model_Q_Paper_ESE_2017_GS_Enggg.pdf
- Log Logdb Db
- data-reconfihsj.xlsx
- Spine
- log-logdb-db.xlsx
- biharmonic.pdf
- Omega As
- Genetic
- Technische Ondersteuning
- Final Ramp 50
- pwrflw-123
- readme.ar.txt
- HW1
- lec1_6243_2003.pdf
- A Review and Implications For

ASSIGNMENT-I

NAVEEN RAJ.R

Optimization Methods for Mechanical Design (ME7680)

Q.1

The optimum solution by trial and error was found to be,

MANG

O

DATE

0

NUMBE

R OF

MANGO

JUICES

LIME

3

1

9

TOTAL

NO. OF

JUICE

S

13

COST

145

(Pls refer attached excel macro.)

**Q.2 You are asked to minimize the stress level induced in a cuboid by a
**

tensile force. You are free to decide the dimensions of the cuboid at your

will.

Is this a valid Optimization problem? Why?

Ans: This probably is not a valid optimization problem as stress is a function of force and

area. And both the parameter can’t be without bounds. Even if we fix the tensile force and

work on it, by increasing the area under action the stress is going to decrease so without real

bound or other constraints from the physical problem, the problem is not a valid optimization

problem.

Q.3

The function to be optimized is

7773 . clearly the function is not unimodal.7070 3.As we can see. the function has two extremum points.6000 -0.6000 bound_phase = 0. of experiments: 10 enter lower bound: 1 enter upper bound: 10 extended_search = 2. From Matlab.9000 num_steps_for_interval_halving = 8 interval_halving = 3. enter no.8000 4. the restluts obtaine were.

4 According to the question time(y) taken to reach the lecture hall by me will be varying as a function of x(no. Q.6991 3. it dint lie near the minima). while Fibonacci took 10. of idli’s).6875 3.e.fibonacci = 3.still it took a lot of function evaluations as it took 8 iterations to reach a tolerance of 1e-1 The Fibonacci and the gold section methods gave a good result.8125 noum_of_func_calc_in_golsec = 11 gold_sec = 3. The bounding phase method gave values which are not even close as the function is not unimodal and the initial guess point and the initial step size taken were bad enough(i. Y=60*log(x)+500/x^2 .7723 RESULT COMPARISION: We see that the exhaustive search gave a bigger interval still the minimum point lied inside the interval. And from the given scenario. but golden section method took 11 experiments. The interval halving method gave a smaller interval with the minima in it.

1000 num_steps_for_interval_halving = 8 interval_halving = 4.0544 4.0000 4.1000 8. The interval halving method gave a smaller interval with the minima in it. as the intial guess was poor. Thus the working of bounding phase method relies on the guess value we choose.6000 bound_phase = 2. The bounding phase gives an even bigger interval.still it took a lot of function evaluations as it took 8 iterations to reach a tolerance of 1e-1 .MATLAB OUTPUT: enter no.1250 noum_of_func_calc_in_golsec = 11 gold_sec = 4. of experiments: 10 enter lower bound: 1 enter upper bound: 10 extended_search = 2.1289 fibonacci = 4.0586 4.8000 4.1276 RESULT COMPARISION: We see that the exhaustive search gave a bigger interval still the minimum point lied inside the interval.

As it gives a better result in fewer number of experiments done.1*x)*(1-(x/100)))]+[1000/((. but golden section method took 11 experiments. According to the problem. Q.1*x))]+[1000/((. while Fibonacci took 10.5 From the above problems we find that FIBONACCI method is better than the others. The Fibonacci and the gold section methods gave a good result. the time taken(y)in seconds . So let us use the same for this problem. Y=[(1000/(. to complete the race is.1*x)*(1-(x/100)^2))] MATLAB OUT PUT: .

- Transportation ProbUploaded bySuvam
- Minimization and MaximizationUploaded byCarlos Gorian
- functions.pdfUploaded byDeni Redha
- Historical Reference Crop ET Reliable for Irrigation Scheduling During SummerUploaded bykcrameidref
- Differentiation BookletUploaded byHaw Ming X
- Optimization GRG_ MethodUploaded byDeepak Sharma
- Collection of formulas of MathsUploaded bySarungDaudpoto
- tc-47976272-20110124-20_11_20Uploaded byÖztürk Gökal
- Final Exam Review Spring 2011Uploaded byKirby Hu
- Mathematics IV - Advanced Algebra - Activity SheetUploaded byRemalyn Quinay Casem
- calculus-cheat.pdfUploaded byjvaneeden
- Applications of Differentiation HandoutUploaded byUmesh Krishna
- paper_on_GAUploaded byAnirudh Vemula
- liberatore2013.docxUploaded byharish
- MCA 454 Java Lab Assignment 1Uploaded bysankulsybca
- Optim 1 Introduction 2016Uploaded byGerardo Valencia
- 2016 Review (in-Sun)Uploaded byYohana Kedang
- CALCULUS HOMEWORK AMUploaded byblue_l1
- Assessing Error Bound For Dominant Point DetectionUploaded byAI Coordinator - CSC Journals
- Linear ProgrammingUploaded bysudersanaviswanathan
- 3.3 - 3.6 new skool calc BC.pdfUploaded bySaher Saher
- Prob_1_1Uploaded bymiguelgtturbo
- STUDY OF OPTIMIZATION WITH FUZZY CONSTRAINTSUploaded bySam Ghosh
- Nonlinear Model Predictive Control UAVUploaded bySohibul Hajah
- Several Variable CalculusUploaded byPiyush Gupta
- Project Presentation - Effective space optimization & time reduction in part feeding activity: An overviewUploaded bySanyo Chillachi
- OA1_06_2011enUploaded byprocess8
- 1-s2.0-S0038092X16305308-mainUploaded byAhmed Hassan
- Lecture Notes on Differentiation MATH161.pdfUploaded byalchemist
- 22 912085Uploaded byAhmed Samir

- ESE_2017-NOTIFICATION.pdfUploaded byNaveen Raj
- pso.txtUploaded byNaveen Raj
- ReadMe.txtUploaded byNaveen Raj
- Fem ConvergenceUploaded byNaveen Raj
- FEMConvergence.pptUploaded byNaveen Raj
- GG711c_Lec_10.pdfUploaded byNaveen Raj
- Curves of Infinity Decode if PossibleUploaded byNaveen Raj
- strain-gage-rosette-theory.pdfUploaded byNaveen Raj
- Machine Learning Testing DataUploaded byNaveen Raj
- ESE Reforms PublicityUploaded byNaveen Raj
- ESE-2015 CUT-OFF.pdfUploaded byNaveen Raj
- shape_functions_1d.docUploaded byNaveen Raj
- ESE_2017_English_Notice.pdfUploaded byNaveen Raj
- FEMConvergence.pptUploaded byNaveen Raj
- Model_Q_Paper_ESE_2017_GS_Enggg.pdfUploaded byNaveen Raj
- Log Logdb DbUploaded byNaveen Raj
- data-reconfihsj.xlsxUploaded byNaveen Raj
- SpineUploaded byNaveen Raj
- log-logdb-db.xlsxUploaded byNaveen Raj
- biharmonic.pdfUploaded byNaveen Raj
- Omega AsUploaded byNaveen Raj
- GeneticUploaded byNaveen Raj
- Technische OndersteuningUploaded byNaveen Raj
- Final Ramp 50Uploaded byNaveen Raj
- pwrflw-123Uploaded byNaveen Raj
- readme.ar.txtUploaded byNaveen Raj
- HW1Uploaded byNaveen Raj
- lec1_6243_2003.pdfUploaded byNaveen Raj
- A Review and Implications ForUploaded byNaveen Raj