Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rev.01
PERFORMANCE DATA OF
Introduction
Hemoglobin Meter
Dual wavelength
Hemoglobin meter
based on
Micro cuvette
Specification
Hemochroma PLUS
(Marker)
(Range)
(Methodology)
(CV%)
Inter-batch <=1%
Reader-to-reader <=4%
(Correlation)
Tube blood
(Sample volume)
12 ~ 15uL
(Time)
10 sec
(Convenience)
(Storage)
1000
(Dimension)
(Weight)
230g
Remark
(Voltage)
Battery operated
12 hours working
Sleep mode function: within 5 mins.
1 12
(USB -QC)
(Output)
USB for PC
Printer with RS232 (only for printing)
Bluetooth communication
PC interface USB
RS232 data
Bluetooth
Principal of device
LED based optical system
Dual wavelength
Auto calibration
Direct absorbance
Whole blood
850nm
530nm
Detector
Optical
Sheet
Sample
Patent pending
:
: 2011 8 16
: 30-2011-0034087
:
: 2011 8 16
: 10-2011-0080964
:
: 2012-04-13
: 10-2012-0038223
Micro cuvette
Cell gap: 100-200 um
Volume: 12 15 L
Performance
data of
reader
Correlation
Reproducibility
Comparison
Result
R2 = 0.969
Slope = 0.939
Conclusion
Hemochroma PLUS shows high
correlation coefficient value
with Sysmex.
y = 0.9398x + 0.9209
R = 0.9695
N = 250
17
Methods
208 of venous blood (within 7
days after collection)
Test with 6 Hemochroma PLUS
reader
19
15
13
11
11
13
Sysmex [g/dl]
15
17
19
Ref. Appendix 1
Results
R2 = 0.9931
Conclusion
Hemochroma PLUS showed
high correlation with Sysmex
value.
R = 0.9931
N = 138
17
HemoChroma Plus[g/dl]
Methods
Internal control is in-house
control that was from
hemolized bovine blood
Hb concentration of Internal
control was tested and
validated with Sysmex.
Randomly selected reader was
tested with validated internal
control for 138 times
19
15
13
11
9
7
5
5
10
15
20
Sysmex[g/dl]
Appendix 2
Test 1
Test 2
Total
No. of
readers
tested
25
18
43
No. of
samples
49
18
67
MAX
CV%
2.40
3.81
3.81
MIN
CV%
1.42
1.36
1.36
Appendix 3
Test 1: 49 samples
5.0
CV% of reader-to-reader
(25 readers, N=49)
4.5
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
8.7 10.411.311.411.812.012.212.312.312.413.113.213.413.513.713.914.014.114.414.614.714.915.315.516.9
Appendix 3
Test 2: 18 samples
CV% of reader-to-reader
(18 reader, N=18)
5.0
4.5
4.0
3.5
CV%
3.0
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
9.3
10.5
10.9
11.1
11.8
11.9
12.2
12.3
12.8
13
13.4
Hb conc. Estimated
13.8
13.8
15.1
15.1
15.2
15.8
16.4
CV(%)
3.00%
Methods
Normal range of internal
standards 12.2, 13.1, 16.3 g/dL
were used.
Normal range of internal
standard control (n=8) was
tested 10 times repeatedly in 2
readers
2.50%
2.00%
Results
Test repeatability is showed
0.46 ~ 2.77 CV%
In samples of 13 g/dL showed
highest CV%
1.50%
Conclusion
Test repeatability was mostly
less than CV 1 %.
Max CV was 2.77%
0.50%
CV(%)
1.00%
0.00%
16.3
16.3
14.7
14.7
13.1
13.1
12.2
12.2
Appendix 7
21.0
Hemocue 301
R = 0.7325
19.0
Results
Hemochroma PLUS R2 =
0.95
Hemocue 301 R2 = 0.73
Conclusion
6 samples showed different
results in Hemocue 301.
It cause from blood status,
hemochroma PLUS is more
higher correlation in stored
blood.
hemochorma Plus
R = 0.9467
17.0
Hemoglobin[g/dl]
Methods
60 whole blood samples
were tested with
Hemochroma PLUS and
Hemocue 301
15.0
13.0
11.0
9.0
7.0
7.0
9.0
11.0
Hemocue 301
13.0
15.0
Sysmex[g/dl]
17.0
19.0
hemochroma plus
Appendix 5
Performance
Micro Cuvette
Repeatability
Reproducibility
Batch variation
Repeatability of cuvette
Methods
Samples: Internal standard,
Hb 12.1g/dL was used.
10 cuvette were tested each
6 batches
Estimate test CV%
Results
Estimated CV%: 0.5 ~ 1.3
Conclusion
Test variation of cuvette was
estimated within CV 1.3%.
Batch
Run1 Run2 Run3 Run4 Run5 Run6 Run7 Run8 Run9 Run10 AVG CV(%)
HBPXF01 12.0
12.1
12.0
12.0
12.2
12.0
12.0
12.5
12.1
12.1
12.1
1.3
HBPXF02 12.3
12.4
12.4
12.3
12.2
12.3
12.3
12.4
12.3
12.4
12.3
0.5
HBPXF03 12.8
12.4
12.8
12.3
12.7
12.8
12.8
12.8
12.8
12.8
12.7
1.5
HBPXF04 12.7
12.7
12.7
12.6
12.7
12.7
13.1
12.7
12.7
12.6
12.7
1.1
HBPXF06 12.1
12.1
12.1
12.0
12.2
12.2
12.3
12.1
12.1
12.1
12.1
0.7
HBPXF07 12.1
12.0
12.0
12.1
12.2
12.4
12.4
12.0
12.2
12.3
12.2
1.3
Purpose
Evaluation of test CV% of
same cuvette batch
1.3
HBPXF06
0.7
HBPXF04
1.1
HBPXF03
1.5
HBPXF02
0.5
HBPXF01
1.3
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
CV%
Appendix 5
Methods
Samples: Internal standard
panel .
10 cuvette were tested each
6 batches
Estimate test CV%
Conclusion
High reproducibility between
cuvette batches.
4.0
3.5
3.0
CV%
Results
Estimated CV%: 0.2 ~ 2.5
4.5
6.9
8.2
2.5
13.3
2.0
14.2
17.1
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
HBPXF01 HBPXF02 HBPXF03 HBPXF04 HBPXF06 HBPXF07
Batch No.
Appendix 5
Results
Correlation coefficient:
above than 0.99 in every
batch with Sysmax value
Conclusion
High correlation between
cuvette batches.
18.0
R = 0.9996
16.0
R = 0.9992
Hemochroma Plus (g/dL)
Methods
Samples: Internal standard
panel .
10 cuvette were tested and
calculate average,
Estimate the corrlation
coefficient value (R2)
14.0
R = 0.9993
12.0
R = 0.9995
HBPXF01
HBPXF02
10.0
HBPXF03
HBPXF04
8.0
(HBPXF01)
6.0
(HBPXF02)
(HBPXF03)
4.0
(HBPXF04)
2.0
0.0
0
10
15
20
Appendix 5