You are on page 1of 48

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

Senator the Hon Simon Birmingham


Federal Minister for Education and Training
Parliament Office
PO Box 6100
Senate
Parliament House
Canberra ACT 2600
---------------------The Hon. John Barilaro, MP
NSW Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Skills, and Minister for Small
Business
Ministerial Office
52 Martin Place
SYDNEY NSW 2000
registered post 26 Sept 2016
(Copy) The Hon Gabrielle Upton
NSW Attorney General
(Copy) Senator the Hon George Brandis QC
Federal Attorney General
Dear Honourable Ministers Birmingham & Barilaro
ATTENTION: Attorneys General for NSW and the Commonwealth (Copies)
INTRODUCTION
1. REPORTS 1 & 2: submitted by Charles H Norville 21 Crosby crescent Killarney Vale
2261. This 1st report is the lead off to employment disadvantages involved in the 2nd
report on criminality addressed to the highest Law Officers in Australia. I wish to inform
the Honourable Ministers that as a consequence of the official crime event I have been
denied access to mandated trade training policy to complete, I wish dispute the methods
employed by Law and Judicial Officers to deny this access as well as the overall lack of
fiduciary duty to the Australian tax payer ref @29 EXCLUSION OF THE FIDUCIARY
DUTY TO THE TAX PAYER;
a. This 1st report also has a Public Interest perspective, as well as for personal plight
2. I will show why the most powerful Training Ministers in this Nation cannot assist me
because it would be illegal for them to do so. I am not casting blame on current training
Ministers especially the Hon Simon Birmingham Federal Minister for Education who
seems to have a good handle on the issues of shonky National training agenda, which
are clearly not lucid government policy in either the 1st or 3rd World.
3. Australian Governments are wasting $Billions on bs job game regimes which of course
deny access to people like myself that are a not specifically welfare dependant -ref @40
AUSTRALIA THE REGIMES OF THE SCHOOL ZONE ECONOMY
4. This 1st report to the honourable Ministers is to also inform and to criticize the methods
used to deny me equal access to employment and denying the Australian tax payers
1 of 14

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

fiduciary duty to the cost of my VET training put at $250,000 unless proven otherwise
ref attach TAFE 1952001
5. All the time when litigating on employment issues, applying also merit, Law and Judicial
Officers covered up the criminal offence in their decisions (my thinking it was civil tort)
and in one case removing from medical evidence in the NSW IRC.
6. I continue to carry the burden of 1981 crime against me, in my employment as a
firefighter, then reinforced in 1995 by Workers Comp Law Officers which has had
devastating effects on my life as a viable member having the will to apply skills for
societys benefit but then not recognised in welfare employment regimes. A method of
COVENTRY has been employed ref att page 33-34 [sic 2nd report] I can find no lawyer
to represent me LET ME REITERATE, at least 10 Law Officers (Workers Comp
lawyers) in 1995 did not report the 1981 crime against me to police, instead I was retired
in lieu of dismissal on unrecognised Workers Comp with a family to support. NB I
thought at the time the 1981 heinous act was a civil tort as was the case with many
other Fire Brigade victims;
a. These activities have once again skewed with the outcome of Victims Rights and
Support and DPP under the NSW Justice Department it is just too expensive to
prosecute multiple offenders, but its worse when you are forced to carry the burden of
crimes committed by others NB not just emotional burden but applied punishment of
denied access to job fulfilment due to illegal retirement;
7. As a result of various ve aspects of the legal construct of VRC decisions which
included no amended decision to the VC amendment on my review submission I
returned the money by cheque to the Justice Department.
8. I am giving the Honourable Training Ministers the full scope of events that have
impeded my development as a human being. The Crown Contract of my previous
employment exposed the Fire Brigades ref @38 & 39 when you use the word expose
in government it means not good;
INITIAL REQUEST BUT NOT LIMITING
9. Both reports 1 & 2 remain Private and Confidential and I will not divulge the contents in
any way unless no reasonable explanation is forthcoming in a reasonable time for all
four recipients. But I make special pleading to the Federal Attorney to remove me from
the clutches of the NSW system of rough justice.
a. Report 1 to the Honourable Training Ministers may require different decision outcomes
in the future with any further training needs. For instance serving a prison sentence for
breach of Federal Statutory Declaration gives automatic access to the Jobs Game ref
2 of 14

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

@41, but a jury can also nullify the law;


BACKGROUND (also concerned with 2nd report to Attorneys)
10. For a victim to move on they need to be removed from the crime not to be conversely
criminalised as a means of absolving the guilt of others. Access to viable employment
could have helped. The basis on which is seen in Government mandated trade training
policies for me to complete, with the NCAT in particular also denying access on the
basis of merit ref @35 RSB:SND 14-260 # 1410508 DP Hennessy - 21 October
2014
11. I needed to redeem my skills and the former Federal Attorney General, Nicola Roxon,
advice att 2nd report pge 18, is the only advice that would seem logical in presenting
both mitigation and access under the Common Law to present a Victim Impact
Statement to a Jury of my peers which the Victims Rights & Support Act 2013 (NSW)
does not provide;
12. I demonstrate by means of analogy of various media that establishes that employment
in Australia is not merit based, I use the inference jobs game and school zone
economy. As well I dispute by way of available evidence of how my Nation of birth as a
single citizenship citizen denies me access to equal opportunity in employment by merit,
using the instruments of government and judiciary mainly in NSW but also the
Commonwealth.
ILLUSIVE LEGAL REPRESENTATION:
13. I am unable to obtain legal advice, the Law Society, the Rule Of Law Institute see no
problem where no formal charge has been laid against the perpetrators of the crime
against me in 1981 nor 1995 that the Department of Justice must be aware of. The
crimes then have conversely criminalise me because I am seen as a trouble maker
deserved of contempt of justice and denial of equal employment opportunity being
placed into retirement Coventry Ref 2nd report att pge 33-34 this letter from Fire
Brigades Doug Messenger is example of Coventry, lawyers did/do not want to
represent me to make null the pension they know that I had already tried and it
could not be done applying judicial fairness and equity, unless an extraordinary
amount of money was to be spent, maybe;
NB I AM NOT ASKING FOR THE JUST THE SIMPLE (CONTEMPTABLE) REMOVAL
OF THE PENSION FOR ACCESS TO EMPLOYMENT, THIS TIME I WOULD PREFER
LAW OFFCIERS WILL HAVE TO TAKE THE PENSION OFF ME USING THE
RULE OF LAW ref @9a;
3 of 14

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

a. The Commonwealth Human Rights & Equal Opportunities Commission may have seen
me as the wrong target group being a 4th generation Single Citizenship Citizen;
b. Lets put it another way I am not going to win any tort action in NSW.
THE CONFLICT OF SUPERANNUATION LAW (reiterated in 2nd report)
14. NB RETIREMENT IS NOT MEANT TO BENEFIT EMPLOYMENT: In this 1st report
describes a plethora of evidence available that my retirement was not as may be
suggested, a windfall. Subsequent litigation determined that my retirement was for the
term of my natural life and therefore a system of Coventry by Judicial and employment
agencies, the jobs game ensued;
15.NSW SUPER LAW: I was retired in lieu of dismissal in July 1995 and enforced
mandatory medical reassessment in July 2003 the Superannuation Act 1916 (NSW),
S29 (4) (4A). This instrument expressed mandatory medical reassessment but did not
express reemployment rather implied under S50 & S51 of that Act, thus as of 2003 I
was in forced retirement for the term of my natural life confirmed by judicial litigations.
I submit that under S29 (4)(4A); S48; S49; S50; S51 Superannuation Act 1916, that my
retirement was confirmed as punishment ref 2nd report att pge 33-34 for the term of my
natural life the burden of crimes were/are upon me;
16.I am not receiving superannuation top up on my NSW State Super pension yet under
Federal Law you can go to jail unlike State Super pension members who receive the
top up, if they get caught working over the permitted hours, there is no Federal breach.
COMMONWEALTH LAW: I had to submit a Commonwealth Statutory Declaration
10 Nov 2011 stating that I would never become gainfully employed either on a full-time
or a part-time basis. I an amount from ASSET Super $4,694.45 (issued 11Nov 2011)
was private superannuation that I had accumulated from 1996 (casual employment) as I
needed it for legal advice - Turnbull Hill Lawyers ref MGC:KLA:120082;
17.CRIMINAL BREACH: However knowing that I was going to get casual work in Feb
2012 (10 days) I submitted a protest to the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal. I
breached Federal Law by breaching the Federal Statutory Declaration by being
employed.
18.A reply on my criminal breach was given to the Federal Attorney General, Nicola Roxon
her response recommended to in letter dated 20 Sept 2012 that I go to the Police if I
wanted to pursue this matter further (Ref MC12/1142) ref 2nd report att pge 18;
19.I have also committed fraud but without any guilty intent at the time with litigations
against Transgrid and Central Coast Group Training ref @34 & 35; [sic 33-35]

4 of 14

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

INTERIM CONCLUSIONS:
20.Logically the NSW Government were the responsible agency for both employment and
my reemployment on the 2003 official overturning of the reason for retirement and thus
a new certification was issued. This approach with State Pensioners is similar to that of
the Federal Government who would ensure welfare recipients are listed with an
employment agency if its good enough for them then it should be good enough for
me as applied under the Superannuation Act 1916.
a. I was regardless illegally retired 1995 due to the crime of other members and thus
conversely criminalised as punishment in a method of modern day Coventry in 2003
and confirmed at the NSW Administrative Decisions Tribunal (now NCAT) and NSW
IRC.
HISTORICAL ANALOGY WHERE CONVICTS WERE GIVEN STATUS ON
COMPLETION OF INDENTURED SERVITUDE
21.INTRODUCTION: The bright and recently risen Nation has been reduced to the global
tyranny of political correctness programming that has reduced us to a school zone
economy . is how I see it.
22.National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) 2012 titled Evolution
of Apprenticeships and Traineeships in Australia: an unfinished history . Page
11 - Among the 780 convicts who arrived in 1788 on the First Fleet, there were two
apprentices, 63 whose declared occupation was a skilled trade, and 58 who appear to
be semi-skilled ..
23.These two individual convicts had been sentenced to servitude for trivial crimes as a
result of the chaos of new technology of The Industrial Revolution, which commenced in
Britain causing great social dislocation.
24.Many convicts were either skilled tradesmen or farmers who had been convicted for
trivial crimes and were sentenced to seven years, the time required to set up the
infrastructure for the new colony. Convicts were often given pardons prior to or on
completion of their sentences and were allocated parcels of land to farm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Australia_(1788%E2%80%931850)
THE EMPLOYMENT DEMISE OF CHARLES H. NORVILLE (CHN5)
25.Charles Henry Norville and New South Wales Fire Brigades [2007] NSWIR Comm
45 (in transcript) VIZ REINSTATEMENT OF AN INJURED WORKER: DP Sams
NSWIRC saw fit with the Fire Brigades to remove medical evidence of the criminal
assault from my application of reinstatement of an injured worker and insert Workers
Comp adversarial reports, that he stated as medical referees DP Sams implements
5 of 14

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

a regime of harsh punishment against enforcing the cruel and unusual punishment as
per Doug Messenger ref2nd report att 33-34. Fire Brigades introduce tainted evidence
from the Fire Brigades vocationally corrupt testing used to renew my firefighter
candidacy (bad legal advice).
26.EXCLUSION BY COMMONWEALTH JOBS GAME. The attached: ESFS 261799
access to employment etc from Centrelink 15 Mar 2016. An updated reiteration that
affirms that non welfare recipients, as myself, are excluded from the Jobs Network
Industry, the jobs game being forced into non participation of employment. I am
mature aged which gives a much higher remuneration to employers which further
disadvantages me when engaging the employment market.
27.MY CULTURE & HERITAGE I have a family lineage in electrotechnology trades as my
father CHN4 was an RAF trained aircraft electrical and instrument fitter and grandfather
CHN3 was a founder of Breville being TAFE trained in electrical and mechanical
engineering. They had earned status on the basis of merit.
28.DENIED THE RIGHT TO DEFEND MY COUNTRY OF BIRTH - I was denied access to
become an Australian Army reservist because of the excessive vetting by the Federal
Government Employer. Female Army personnel phoned my wife (2nd marriage) to join
the Australian Army Reserve as she had also sat for the Army induction process she
declined to join the Army Reserve. Both CHN 3rd & 4th fought for Australia in WW2,
grandad on mums side operated a Vicars machine gun in Europe WW1 mum said he
was too tired to live, but he was a good soldier and did his job and was a kind man, a
printer by trade he assisted in the WW2 effort by training recruits. NB Government is
ignorant of what makes a good soldier, and what kills them as citizens The Australian
Parliament has Globalised the sovereignty of its population in favour of mass dual
citizenry which can never defend Australia. We expect our soldiers to fight for US
hegemony and the dual citizen.
29.EXCLUSION OF THE FIDUCIARY DUTY TO THE TAX PAYER The attached: Enquiry
Number -1952001 from TAFE which I requested to quantify the cost to tax payers of
VET courses that I have completed at TAFE (apart from the required capstone onsite
trade training). I assume that the TAFE courses that I have completed are costed at
$250,000 under present day costs. Without adequate response of audited amounts I
will use the $250,000 for the record.
30.The following completed vocational courses:
6 of 14

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

Certificate in Fire Engineering Dec 1990;

Statement of Attainment in Firefighting Station Management Dec 1990;

Statement of Attainment in Building Code of Australia Dec 1995;

5185 Associate Diploma in Applied Science in Building July 1996;

Statement of Attainment in Computer Databases and Spreadsheets July 1997;

Certificate in Computer Applications for the Office July 1996;

9977 Diploma of Environmental Monitoring and Technology Dec 2004;

UTE 30999 Certificate 3 in Electrotechnology Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Dec


2009; [no capstone completion]

90969 NSW Certificate 1 in Electrical Pre-Vocation Dec 2009;

9147 NSW Course in Language, Literacy & Numeracy July 2010 (superfluous)

UEE30807 Certificate 3 in Electrotechnology Electrician Dec 2012; [no capstone


completion]

31.I was one of the first if not the first TAFE qualified firefighter in Australia and
unfortunately (career wise) I was one of the least corrupt. The NSW Fire Brigades did
not recognise TAFE studies that were directly fire brigades related.
32.APPRENTICE EMPLOYMENT: I was briefly employed as an apprenticed refrigeration
mechanic until victimised under age discrimination in 2007. I then forced the NSW
Government to place me onto the Continuing Apprenticeship Programme Service
scheme (CAPS). However I was never engaged into apprenticeship employment. The
CAPS scheme didnt permit the updating of merit on further course completions so that
prospective employers were not viewing my current merit for employment. Merit is
treated with contempt by employment agencies the more the merit the older you are.

33.TRANSGRID: In another anti-discrimination complaint against Transgrid I went onto a


training programme with an employment agency HR Solutions with Michael Wolf for
nine months May 2012 Jan 2013 which included door knocking at employers which I
have done previously anyway and then without success again on this occasion.
34.NSW NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunities Division being an apprentice
trade training entry position RSB:SND 14-260 # 1410508 DP Hennessy - 21
October 2014 - In examining the lack of fiduciary duty of apprenticeship training cost to
the tax payer by Central Coast Group Trainers (CCGT), my resume is considered
immaterial by DP Hennessy to the apprenticeship training position Hennessys
decision: Mr Norvilles addressing of the criteria is so poor that the respondent, in my
7 of 14

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

view, was justified in rejecting that application. It is not incumbent on the respondent to
go to the resume document and to extract from that document the criteria which was
required to be addressed and deduce from that resume that Mr Norville meets those
criteria
35.DOCUMENT OF SUMMARY SUBMITTED TO DP HENNESSY: During proceedings I
presented Deputy Hennessy and CCGT a case summary, with a submission which
contained inter alia the analogy of convicts of 1788 together my own Federal crime on
superannuation statutory declaration (Fed) involving the former Federal Attorney, Nicola
Roxon ref @18-19. I realise now that I have committed fraud and an appeal would
have been illegal under the Federal Statutory Declaration I signed.
36.EXCLUSION BY COMMONWEALTH: Ref: The attached: ESFS 261799 access to
employment regimes from Centrelink 15 Mar 2016. Affirms that non welfare
recipients are not included in the economy. Mature aged allow much higher
remuneration to employers which further disadvantages me when engaging the
employment market.
THE FIRE BRIGADES IS (FORMALLY) VOCATIONALLY CORRUPTION:
37.In 1991 & 1995 I submitted a report to Minister for Emergency Services and other
watchdog instruments of IAC, Ombudsman, WorkCover (and the Coroner) under Crown
Contract as a Statutory Informant on vocational corruption within the NSW Fire
Brigades. One issue is that the Fire Brigades did not recognise TAFE studies that were
directly fire brigades related.
38.THE CROWN CONTRACT The Statutory Instrument: Fire Brigades Act 1989, Part
2 Provision of fire brigades etc S6-Commissioner duty function; S7-Commissioner
authority function S10 Commissioner to Firefighter function; 69(2) viz employed by
government in service of the Crown; Superannuation Act 1916 S48 Breakdown
pensioner held to be on leave. I considered as a Statutory Instrument I had imprimatur
and previous submissions I have uploaded onto World Wide Web other instances of
Fire Brigades and Union corruption that none of the NSW watchdog bodies seem
concerned about. Although my submission on Fire Brigades secondary employment to
the AIRC (Federal) was recognised Ref PR072002 @ 6 & 140 the working hours case.
(Ref SCRIBD web site). http://www.airc.gov.au/alldocuments/PR072002.htm
INTERIM CONCLUSIONS:
39.I hold a great deal of respect and affinity to the mature aged 1788 apprenticed convicts
who were able to serve out their trivial offences and then were given the status of
gainful employment.
8 of 14

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

AUSTRALIA THE REGIMES OF THE SCHOOL ZONE ECONOMY


40. REF: Six Million Australian need to be retrained: Sydney Morning

Herald 14 April 2016. http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/six-millionaustralians-need-to-be-retrained-20160414-go68gt.html Australia's workforce at the


Knowledge Nation Summit in Sydney at the Australian Technology Park, before an
audience that included Federal Ministers Christopher Pine and Simon Birmingham,
Chief Scientist Alan Finkel and CSIRO chairman David Thodey;
a. From the article in question it was mooted that six million Australians need to be
retrained and a lead quote "Australia's economy is stuck in the Stone Age," more than
100 of the nation's leading scientists heard on Thursday [14 April 2016];
b. I could not be considered as one of the six million requiring retraining, because in the
normal sequence of my apprenticeship training, government trade training is mandated
(Ref CAPS @ 33 [sic 32]), requires my being taken up by an employer simply by
making myself available through a registered group trainer, to complete the final leg of
the training known as a capstone;
c. At the conference Mr Barrie, an entrepreneur states "We put up an ad for an office
manager and we got 350 applications in two days;
d. Mr Barrie said his first thought was, who was going to go through all the office
manager applications. His second was, who was going to retrain them.
41. REF: The ABC 4 Corners The jobs game The Governments in Australia
spends billions of dollars getting people into work through mediums that include bribing
employers to take on welfare recipients in useless training rorts. The 4 Corners
programme exposes the industry rorting of useless training which goes on unabated.
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2015/02/23/4183437.htm ;
a. Clearly the jobs network is a gaming of the employment market where merit is not an
issue, given the scale of incompetence as per the Knowledge Nation Summit above.
One could conclude that maybe all employees and employers throughout Australia
regardless of publicly funded jobs network should reapply for their positions, in step
with the Stone Age as stated at the Knowledge Nation Summit above.
42.REF: The ABC 4 Corners Future Proof
http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/stories/2016/07/04/4491818.htm - There are startling
and credible predictions that more than five million Australian jobs will simply disappear
in the next 15 years, as a result of technology. That's 40% of the jobs that exist in
Australia today. .. One part that was alluded to was the remaining 8% of jobs in
manufacturing from the 28% in 1960, to be reduced to 5% in the future a service
9 of 14

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

industry economy is not future proofing when we are selling national security assets to
other Nations that are then to be weaponised against us.
43.DISCUSSION: We owe a lot to the 1788 convicts that were separated from their
families. The Coat Of Arms of the recently risen Nation where the emu and kangaroo
cannot take a step backwards. A sovereign nation logically requires a forward quality
society not a backward quantity society. Technology demands we do more with less,
nanotechnology will make the cost of labour irrelevant.
CONCLUSIONS & PROJECTED DISCUSSION (1st & 2nd report)
44.A Nation that cannot defend itself becomes absorbed, this is historical fact that we
seem doomed to play out. It doesnt help when people like myself are excluded from
the economy;
45.My actions now I am sure have wrongly vindicated the guilty in an arbitrary approach to
my Rights as a Victim within the Justice Department. If Justice cannot be afforded me I
will take another path under the Rule Of Law:
a. What I think happened Ref 2nd report @5 The VRC made reference to SHORT
MINUTES OF ORDER at para 13 of the VRC decision and I suspect the VRC would
have known about the criminal negligence of the WC Law Officers very early in the
investigation and knew that the decision of non-payment of VC was ultra-vires in the
Civil Jurisdiction of the WC Court. But when physical evidence ref VICTIMS SERVICES
REVIEW OF DECISION is submitted they can no longer pursue non VC payment (thus

payment made) and so an amended decision would undo the investigation as


complete. The VRC then purse further illegitimate enquiry on my psychiatric fitness
outside the legal construct of decision determination. This looks highly suspicious given
the history of my WC abuse, and I rightfully make assertions to impasse created.
46.No conclusion could be drawn that I was, in the case in the Knowledge Nation Summit
ref @41, [sic 40] below the level of 6 million Australians needing retraining when there
was mandated trade training policy for me to complete my training. Rather vetting on
age etc to find reasons not to employ me regardless of merit.
47.If the 1981 crime had been reported to police in 1995, then a retirement would not have
occurred I would have had access to Workers Comp for work related stress NB
Retirement is not meant to be a profitable enterprise as demonstrated under State and
Federal superannuation instruments;
48.I am not receiving superannuation top up on my NSW State Super pension yet under
Federal Law you can go to jail unlike State Super pension members who receive the
top up, if they get caught working over the permitted hours, there is no Federal
10 of 14

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

Statutory Declaration. The 1788 mature aged convict apprentices did not have these
issues.
49.I have breached a Federal Statutory Declaration as well as committing fraud against
Transgrid and Central Coast Group Training because it was/is illegal for me to work
although I did not realise the fraud against these two companies at the time;
50.For a victim to move on they need to be removed from the crime not to be conversely
criminalised as a means of absolving the guilt of others;
51.Carried forward to report 2 to Attorneys.
Signed:
Charles H. Norville; date: 26 Sept 2016
Encl
666.tar.feathers@gmail.com

ATT page 12: TAFE enquiry 1952001 to inquire about the cost of my courses;
ATT page 13: Centrelink enquiry ESFS 261799 on exclusion of employment regimes

11 of 14

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

12 of 14

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

13 of 14

1st REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN TRAINING MINISTERS

14 of 14

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

1 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

Senator the Hon George Brandis QC


Federal Attorney General
PO Box 143 Albion DC Qld 4010
The Hon Gabrielle Upton, MP
NSW Attorney General
GPO Box 5341, Sydney NSW 2001

registered post 26 Sept 2016

(Copy) Senator the Hon Simon Birmingham


Federal Minister for Education and Training
(Copy) The Hon. John Barilaro, MP
NSW Minister for Regional Development, Minister for Skills, and Minister for Small
Business
REF: Reassessment form under Victims Rights and Support Regulation 2013, Part 5,
Division 3 - 170483D ~ submitted 22 Aug 2016 with returned cheque att 2nd report
REF: Invitation to the review of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW)
Dear Attorneys General the Commonwealth and NSW
ATTENTION: Ministers Birmingham & Barilaro (Copies)
Special REF former Federal AG, Nicola Roxon (Ref MC12/1142) attached page 18
INTRODUCTION Charles H Norville 21 Crosby crescent Killarney Vale 2261
1. IMPRIMATUR OF 2nd REPORT: There is an invitation from the NSW Department of Justice
that gives rise to the 1st and 2nd reports, following: The NSW Department of Justice is
conducting a review of the Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 (NSW). Interested
individuals and organisations are invited to make submissions to the review http://www.victimsservices.justice.nsw.gov.au/
a. It is not my place to lecture the most Senior Law Officers of Australia on the Rule Of
Law vs the Rule by Law and dissent of the Common Law by adversarial elements
especially with regard to Superannuation Law ref @39 & 87;
2. A review of the Victims Rights Tribunal decision 11 Aug 2014 was sent 18 Sept 2014 to
the VICTIMS SERVICES REVIEW OF DECISION. VC Lawyers Napier Keen, stated
that the review was unlikely to be successful and they will not represent me to review
the decision not to pay Victims Compensation (VC). The VRC stated that I had already
received a civil settlement in 1996 Workers Compensation Court which exceeded the
VC amount which had no stipulated base amount in the decision but this was reversed
on review and an amount of $9,483.06 was eventually deposited into my account 1st Oct
2015 but without an amended decision.
3. An amount of $516.94 was a payment to the NSW Public Trustee because the VRC did
not know my new address, although they had my email and mobile number;
4. The VRC did not provide an amended decision and when a reassessment under
transition provisions of the Victims Rights & Support Act (VR&SA) allowed. I thus
2 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

returned, and for other reasons, the amount by cheque to the NSW Dept of Justice
170483D on 22 Aug 2016 with the reassessment form with an alternative request for a
de-novo of the criminal investigation being incomplete.
5. UPDATE: no1 -30 Aug 2016 VRC response by phone in brief Victims Services on
receiving the cheque insist that the amount will be returned with possible additional
amount I refused this. The VS Officer was not interested in my request for a de-novo
of the investigation;

no2 I received 18 Sept VRC letter dated 30 Aug 2016 the VRC

states that I had nominated the following compensable injuries: Psychological or


Psychiatric Disorder or psychiatric disorder: Category 2: chronic disorder that is severely
disabling This latest endeavour by the VRC is consistent with the Fire Brigades, Doug
Messengers overturning of HealthQuest certified wellbeing July 2003 similar to the VRC
now overturning its own legal construct of its decision, 11 Aug 2014. Doug Messenger
denying access to employment att pge 33-34; NB this is looking like the 1995 illegal
retirement again, so the Government can declare arbitrarily reports 1 and 2 as rants of
someone with a personality disorder. I advise that the Honourable Ministers and
Attorneys to look up my profile before believing in the bureaucratic mischief makers.
A CASE FOR DE-NOVO OF INVESTIGATION
a. The basis why the investigation into criminal events should be de-novo is the lack of
legal construct of decisions by the VRC decisions determinations. The VRC must
also realise that they should have had evidence of the criminal deception by the Law
Officers of 1995 and that doesnt look good for so called Victims Rights and Support;
b. Firstly an amendment of the VC amount was made without an accompanied
amendment to the original decision the original decision lacking as well the base VC
amount which was deduced as encompassed into the WC commutation in Mar 1996.
c. In the now second turn around, to invite my own insanity, I would not expect this to
be allowed within current reassessment construct, again a lack of legislative
instrument and I did not ask for such in the previous review. There was decision
originally made 4th Oct 2011, on my psychological and psychiatric health by
Authorised Report Writer, Pamela Costantini, .that Mr Norville has managed to
cope reasonably well and he has not suffered from a DSM-IV condition;
d. no 2 is simply a re-run of the 1995 retirement decision of my having a purported
Personality Disorder which was never diagnosed by any authorised practitioner and
continually contested and this is core of my current submissions as the retirement
would not have occurred being illegally contrived by WC Law Officers in 1995 who
should have reported the 1981 crime to Police. I initially contested the false
diagnosis before Deputy Hennessys decisions Norville v State Authorities

3 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

Superannuation Trustee Corporation (2005) NSW ADT 137: Hennesseys


reasons for decision: There is obviously some room for debate about whether or not
Dr Milton was making a diagnosis of paranoid personality disorder but certainly his
opinion was that the material was consistent with a finding that Mr Norville had such
a disorder. So it is not strictly correct to say that no one else came up with that
diagnosis; Rod Milton an expensive Forensic Psychiatrist, he was not a treating
doctor but an adversarial doctor ref @46;
e. THIS IS WHAT I THINK HAPPENED: The VRC made reference to SHORT
MINUTES OF ORDER at para 13 of the VRC decision and I suspect the VRC would
have known about the criminal negligence of the WC Law Officers very early in the
investigation and knew that the decision of non-payment of VC was ultra-vires in the
Civil Jurisdiction of the WC Court. But when physical evidence ref VICTIMS
SERVICES REVIEW OF DECISION is submitted they can no longer pursue non VC

payment (thus payment made) and so an amended decision would undo the
investigation as complete. The VRC then purse further illegitimate enquiry on my
psychiatric fitness outside the legal construct of decision determination. This looks
highly suspicious given the history of my WC abuse, and I rightfully make assertions
to the impasse created.
INITIAL REQUEST BUT NOT LIMITING
6. Both reports 1 & 2 remain Private and Confidential and I will not divulge the contents in
any way unless no reasonable explanation is forthcoming in a reasonable time for all
four recipients. But I make special pleading to the Federal Attorney to remove me from
the clutches of the NSW system of rough justice asap.
THE REVIEW 18 SEPT 2014 OF THE VRC DECISION 11 Aug 2014
7. In the review submission Ref VICTIMS SERVICES REVIEW OF DECISION I gave
physical evidence of the criminal conspiracy by Workers Comp Law Officers, my lawyers
in 1995-6 who had contracted out of the WC Jurisdiction to implement my retirement in
lieu of dismissal for personal gain to remain in the WC Jurisdiction instead of reporting
the crime to NSW Police that I had detailed to my lawyers 1 May 1995 in Garfield
Barwick Chambers ref THE CRIMINAL OMISSION BY LAW OFFICERS 1995 @20-25; ref
att pge 19-29;
8. My retirement in lieu of dismissal would not have occurred if Police had been informed in
1995 and I would have also have received WC rehabilitation.
9. NB it took a special task force for major NSW Police investigation in Nov 2010 before a
conclusion of an obvious crime was finally determined in Aug 2014 on the balance of

4 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

probabilities to avoid the major expense of a criminal prosecution of the perpetrators,


no conviction no tort, no tort no justice;
THE VICTIMS RIGHTS DETERMINATION on the available evidence
10.The criminal determination 11 Aug 2014 on the balance of probabilities that the
applicant is a primary victim of an act of violence pursuant to section 20 of the Act. I find
section 19 of the Act is established in so far as an incident has occurred during the
commission of an offence that involves violent conduct against the applicant that has
resulted in injury to the person
11.The decision 11 Aug 2016 . The lump sum payment already received exceeded
that which is available under the relevant recognition category The original decision
makes no payment and then a payment on review (submitted 18 Sept 2014) is made
without an amended decision;
12.Police under Task Force SIME 2010 warned me that the NSW Fire Rescue (formally Fire
Brigades) and their Union would vigorously defend the accused Firemen, there was
never any intention to prosecute anyone given mainly the extreme cost to government;
a.

Task Force SIME revealed the many criminal assaults by the Fire Brigades that were
I presume as assumed grotesque civil torts;

13.Under Police Task Force SIME 2010, The Police Prosecutor refused to hand over
evidence to my VC lawyers Napier Keen and I dont know what evidence was shown to
the VRC to make their determination;
a.

Even at the point of belated investigation (2010) the Government Law Officers
decided on a suppression of the truth - so much for the Charter of Victims Rights;

14.My VC Lawyers Napier Keen were not going to get involved in this stating to me:
a.

Dec 2012 We are pursuing a victims compensation claim for you only;

b.

29 Aug 2014 (on VRC decision 11 Ag 2014) we are of the view that the review
would be unsuccessful we would be unable to do this for you.

15.What is known as explained to me by police in interview is that all those involved made
admission to their involvement at the time of the incident at Stanmore Fire Station 1981,
but none declared responsibility for specific criminal deeds. There was also
corroborating witnesses who knew of my plight after the incident;
16.The NSW Govt Departments I fear will continue to punish me for the term of my natural
life, with the assistance of: HealthQuest; State Super; Health Care Complaints
Commission; WorkCover; ICAC; Ombudsman; NCAT (ADT); NSWIRC.;
17. DISCUSSION: The VRC looking as though they are in concert with Law and Judicial
Officers in avoiding the criminal context of the SHORT MINUTES OF ORDER as per

5 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

VRC decision 14 Aug 2015 and as previously submitted Ref VICTIMS SERVICES REVIEW
OF DECISION 18 Sept 2015.

18. I suspect that NSW Lawyers have always seen the writing on the wall after numerous
emails and phone discussions to attract a lawyer what we have is proforma law for
needy. In declining to assist me, as with The Law Society and Rule Of Law Institute
finding a good lawyer in NSW will be like finding a needle in hay stack;
19. The Victims Rights and Support Act 2013 is an oxymoron to the Rule Of Law of Victims
Rights. There is no provision for me to make a victims impact statement because I am
only a victim on the balance of probabilities. It was ethically proper to return the goaway money to the NSW Justice Department.
THE CRIMINAL OMISSION BY LAW OFFICERS 1995
20.On 1981 I was criminally assaulted by Fire Brigades members on B Platoon at
Stanmore. Regardless of the grotesque nature of the crime Im lead to believe (as many
other firemen) that the crime was a civil tort over the years by Law Officers and Judicial
Officers, who should have known better;
21.On 26 Aug 1994 I go onto unrecognised Workers Compensation for second time for the
injuries of work related stress, the first claim for stress was 16/2/93 26/3/93. I had to go
on welfare to care for my family;
22.On 28 Oct 1994 I sign the WC lawyers PK Simpson retainer agreement, which specified
as follows inter alia;
The solicitor shall not investigate negligence proceedings as I do not wish to spend any
funds on that investigation;
23.On 1 May 1995 in the evening, I attend with a meeting with my Workers Compensation
solicitors PK Simpson, Jeffrey Elia, Gabrielle, and one other and barrister, Vaughn
Jurisich at Garfield Barwick Chambers in the City of Sydney;
a. As per personal diary ledger Ref VICTIMS SERVICES REVIEW OF DECISION;
24.They hear and see my emotional release of what I have stated as a grotesque assault
against me by Fire Brigades members this was probably Post Traumatic Stress release
which I had done previously with psychologist Dr Nicholas Marlowe;
25.At the time and in conclusion of my emotional release barrister Vaughn Jurisich states I
will get them referring to the Fire Brigades and I was thinking of this statement that he
may mean also get the individual members in question as well as the Fire Brigades. I am
not told that what I divulged was a criminal offence;
26.On 2 May 1995 report from my treating psychologist Dr Nicholas Marlowe is sent to
Jeffrey Elia of PK Simpson Workers Compensation solicitors and with respect of the said

6 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

assault, inter alia, During his first year he was subjected to humiliating bastardisation
ritual and victimisation;
27.1 June 1995 an WC amendment to an Workers Compensation is sent to Messer
Hickson, Lakeman & Holcombe solicitors acting for the GIO and Fire Brigades and with
respect of the said assault states @ (i) On 26 April 1991 applicant was assaulted by
other employees apart from the wrong year meant to be 1981 not 1991 there is no
mention of criminal assault, which should have been reported to Police, and I dont
remember the specific 26 April date;
28.12 May 1995 I submit a 26 page Chronology under the instruction of Jeffrey Elia of
PK Simpson and on page 19, I outline details of the assault as follows;
a. At page 22 of 26 page Chronology I informed Union Secretary, John Slade on 9
Sept 2987; on 2 Oct 1987 Slade informs Chief Officer, Bill Reay & Personnel Officer;
29.On 1 June 1995 PK Simpson send a letter to the State Authorities Superannuation
Trustee Corporation (state super) and obtain a response dated 7 June 1995, I obtained
under Freedom Of Information (FOI) which requested benefits payable on resignation
and invalidity contracting out of the Workers Comp jurisdiction viz S48; S29(4) (4a)
Superannuation Act 1916;
a.

The Fire Brigades also initiate moves to retire me or rather according to Doug
Messenger confirming punishment att pge 33-34.

30.I was retired on 5 July 1995 by HealthQuest for a personality disorder which no doctor
has ever diagnosed. I was retired in lieu of dismissal on unrecognised Workers
Compensation and on welfare to support my family at the time;
31.In March 1996 at the Workers Compensation Court the barrister acting for PK Simpson,
Mr Vaughn Jurisich questions me in front of the Judge There was a lot of stress being
caused, there was allegations of victimisation and matters of that nature, is that right .
32.I stated to the question by Mr Jurisich Thats correct and was true with respect of most
of the harassment issues listed being a Statutory Informant against Fire Brigades
corruption, but greatly allusive of the assault that all Law Officers knew including the
responding, Messer Hickson, Lakeman & Holcombe solicitors acting for the GIO and Fire
Brigades. I conclude deception of a criminal nature by at least 10 Law Officers;
33. Just prior to the actual Court hearing of March 1996 I signed the consent agreement for
the second injury and within the SHORT MINUTES OF ORDER it states 26 August
1996 which is the declared date of the injury and an amount of $30,000 Commutation is
agreed and to as well [sic agreed to] which was barely meant to cover lost wages;
34.I had been retired (5 July 1995) on an amount of app $730 fortnight from a salary of app
$1,183 fortnight (40% reduction) as per State Super document to PK Simpson 7 June

7 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

1995 as of the 26 May 1995 [sic 26 May employment exit point];


35. 26 April 1996, a document obtained under FOI with contrary Fire Brigades advice that
the Commutation was not approved for the second 26 Aug 1994 injury but rather for a
closed period for the first the injury 16/2/93 26/3/93 this indicates a problem in the
Workers Comp due process ref pge 29;
36. [NB FOI to access some state super docs was denied due to legal privilege by ADT
Judicial Officer DP Hennessy]
THE CONFLICT OF SUPERANNUATION LAW
37. NB RETIREMENT IS NOT MEANT TO BENEFIT EMPLOYMENT: In this 1st [sic 2nd]
report describes a plethora of evidence available that my retirement was not as may be
suggested, a windfall. Subsequent litigation determined that my retirement was for the
term of my natural life and therefore a system of Coventry by Judicial and employment
agencies, the jobs game ensued;
38. NSW SUPER LAW: I was retired in lieu of dismissal in July 1995 and was given
documentation to enforce belatedly in July 2003 a medical reassessment under the
Superannuation Act 1916 (NSW), S29 (4) (4A). This instrument expressed mandatory
medical reassessment but did not express reemployment implied under S50 & S51 of
that Act, thus as of 2003 I was an enforced retirement for the term of my natural life. I
submit that under S29 (4)(4A); S48; S49; S50; S51 Superannuation Act 1916 I submit
that under this Act I was thus registered for employment as well as reemployment with
the NSW Government Ref 2nd report att pge 33-34;
39. I am not receiving superannuation top up on my NSW State Super pension yet under
Federal Law you can go to jail unlike State Super pension members who receive the top
up, if they get caught working over the permitted hours, there is no Federal Statutory
Declaration to prosecute.
40. COMMONWEALTH LAW: I had to submit a Commonwealth Statutory Declaration 10
Nov 2011 stating that I would never become gainfully employed either on a full-time or
a part-time basis. The amount from ASSET super $4,694.45 (issued 11Nov 2011) was
private superannuation that I had accumulated from 1996 (casual employment) as I
needed it for legal advice Turnbull Hill Lawyers ref MGC:KLA:120082;
41. CRIMINAL BREACH: However knowing that I was going to get casual work in Feb 2012
(10 days) I submitted a protest to the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal. I breached
Federal Law by breaching the Federal Statutory Declaration by being employed. I have
hence committed a breach of Federal Statute which has also consequently lead to
fraudulent behaviour in attempting to gain employment with Trandsgrid and Central Coast
Group Training (CCGT);
8 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

42. A reply on my Federal breach was given to the Federal Attorney General, Nicola Roxon
and in her response recommended to me in a letter dated 20 Sept 2012 that I go to the
Police if I wanted to pursue this matter further (ref MC12/1142 att pge 18);
43. UNINTENTIONAL FRAUD: I committed a breach of Federal Statutory Declaration 10
Nov 2011, which has consequently lead to fraudulent behaviour in attempting to gain
employment with Trandsgrid (above) and Central Coast Group Training (CCGT). CCGT
have a copy of the submission to Hennessy, NCAT, on my Federal breach of my Stat
Dec. I did not realise at the time that I had done anything wrong.
44. With the anti-discrimination complaint against Transgrid I went [sic as agreed outcome]
onto a training programme with an employment agency HR Solutions with Michael Wolf
for nine months May 2012 till Jan 2013 which included door knocking at employers
which I have done previously anyway and then without success. I was not aware I was
doing anything wrong with either Transgrid nor Central Coast Group Training;

THE MALFEASANT JUDICIARY


THE ADT & NCAT under JP Hennessy
45. Deputy Hennessys decisions Norville v State Authorities Superannuation
Trustee Corporation (2005) NSW ADT 137 For FOI changes to the retirement
documents, which are monumentally flawed in various parts of the ADT document(s)
handed down using one of the adversarial Workers Comp doctors, Dr Milton and none
of my own medical referees I sought to have the HealthQuest document changed
from Personality Disorder to Work Related Stress. No medical practitioner ever made
a diagnosis of Personality Disorder.
46. Hennesseys reasons for decision: There is obviously some room for debate about
whether or not Dr Milton was making a diagnosis of paranoid personality disorder but
certainly his opinion was that the material was consistent with a finding that Mr
Norville had such a disorder. So it is not strictly correct to say that no one else came
up with that diagnosis; Rod Milton an expensive Forensic Psychiatrist was a
adversarial Workers Comp doctor, as trial by voodoo, he was not a treating doctor;
47. Hennessey orders were to make no changes to HealthQuest document (lacking in
substance) but then she orders change to a Fire brigades document slip of physical
incapacity to psychological unfitness;
48. Apart from the my clinical psychology, Dr Nicholas Marlowes report stating the
assault detail and the 26 page Chronology HealthQuest and Hennessey reviewed
the detail by Dr Rod Milton a forensic psychiatrist, Milton states;
9 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

49. There was some bastardisation there in which his clothes were stripped off and his
pubic hair shaved, and he suffered various other indignities. Dr Rod Milton is a
Forensic Psychiatrist who should have queried what is seen as a crime event.
Instead he goads me in an attempt to distress me on the bastardisation and quoted
that must have been rude. Milton was an expensive adversarial Workers Comp
doctor, but he was also a high profile Forensic Psychiatrist and with any suspicion of a
crime should have advised lawyers eg this needs to be reported to police and btw
pay him his workers compensation, treat Mr Norville with some respect give him
rehab [NSW IRC DP Sams uses Rod Miltons report in his determination excluding
treating doctors such Dr Nicholas Marlowes & Dr Howards reports];
50. Hennessy had the criminal assault accounts in her procession as did many NSW
Government Health & Law Officer & Judicial Officers. The respondent State Super
(SASTC) clearly had FOI information confirming this criminally of fraudulent retirement
because Hennessy should have been able to view this legal privilege documents,
which was denied me.
a. Although the 2003 fitness to return to reemployment was determined, Hennessys
determination (2005) seriously damages any chance of employment via employment
agency vetting including the NSW Government Premiers Dept eg att pge 33-34;
51. NSW NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunities Division being an
apprentice trade training entry position RSB:SND 14-260 # 1410508 DP
Hennessy - 21 October 2014 Mr Norvilles addressing of the criteria is so poor that
the respondent, in my view, was justified in rejecting that application. It is not
incumbent on the respondent to go to the resume document and to extract from that
document the criteria which was required to be addressed and deduce from that
resume that Mr Norville meets those criteria ref @36 [sic 34] 1st report.
THE NSW IRC under JP Sams
52. Charles Henry Norville and New South Wales Fire Brigades [2007] NSWIR
Comm 45 (in transcript) DP Sams NSWIRC saw fit with the Fire Brigades to
remove medical evidence from my application of reinstatement of an injured worker
and insert Workers Comp adversarial reports, that he stated as medical referees as
well as tainted evidence from the Fire Brigades vocationally corrupt testing used to
renew my firefighter candidacy (bad advice from my proforma lawyer Coventry).
53. What was appalling was the issue of my opposition to Fire Brigades Institutionalised
Freemasonry raised specifically by the Fire Brigades, counsel. (In paraphrase) DP

10 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

Sams would find offense to my comment that Institutionalised Freemasonry turns


good men into useful idiots, but I state to Sams in defence that my Great Grandfather
CHN2 would be appalled at the Fire Brigades Freemasonry practices not being
performed properly. CHN2 was a Master Mason and I have (nine) 9 of his
parchments, the transcript provided to VRC on this debacle does not suggest that I
considered my Great Grandfather Norville CHN2 a useful idiot. I am not clubie; pubie;
Jesuit; or Freemason (in transcript -REF: VICTIMS RIGHTS REVIEW OF DECISION).
THE OMBUDSMAN under the care of Bruce Barbour & others
Ombudsman: C/2001/7725 &7727 Re Mr Y Piga 22 Oct 2001; R/01/234 Re Bruce
Barbour, Ombudsman 7 Oct 2001.
54. Mr Barbour states inter alia: I have read My Pigas decision and other material on file
This refers to the 26 page Chronology and the retirement which the Ombudsman
see nothing wrong with. Senior Investigation Officer Piga states except in those
rare cases where the opinion is clearly so unreasonable that no reasonable person
would have given it. I do not believe this office is in a position to make that decision in
this instance so that the Ombudsman has no problem with the criminal assault
either.
Ombudsman: C/2013/6251 Investigation Officer Patrick Trieu 5 Sept 2013
55. In 2013 the process of dealing with the VRC via Napier Keen the Police having done
their investigation 2010, I send once more to the Ombudsman but prior to the official
outcome decision by VRC viz 11 Aug 2014, once again the 26 page Chronology and
following email detail sent 22 Aug 2013:
56. The following attachments in the email
The following attachments
26 page chronology ref Bastardisation @ page 19 ...in order of responsibility;
o @ page 22 ~ 9.9.87; 2.10.87 re reporting bastardisation to Chief Officer Bill Reay;
Personnel Office Alan Grunsell; Union Secretary John Slade;
Treating psychiatrist Dr Mark Howard ref 26 page summary @ para 4;
Treating psychologist Dr Marlowe ref Bastardisation @ para 2;
GIO psychiatrist Milton re bastardisation @ 11;
Ombudsman 221001 (C/2001/7725 & 7727) re 26 page chronology @ para 2nd page

57. The response by the Ombudsman Investigation Officer 5 Sept 2013 Ref C/2013/6251
officer Patrick Trieu states inter alia While I note your allegations about being
victimised, harassed or discriminated against, I cannot find any clear evidence of
wrong administrative conduct on the part of a NSW government agency that warrants
any action by this office.
58. INTERIM CONCLUSION: Quite apart from the specific bias, these people deal with the

11 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

law they must know what a crime looks like. Lawyers steer clear of litigants of this
nature, like myself, knowing that the of Coventry has displaced the Rule Of Law.
HISTORICAL ANALOGY WHERE CONVICTS WERE GIVEN STATUS ON
COMPLETION OF INDENTURED SERVITUDE
59. National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) 2012 titled
Evolution of Apprenticeships and Traineeships in Australia: an unfinished
history . Page 11 therein - Among the 780 convicts who arrived in 1788 on the
First Fleet, there were two apprentices, 63 whose declared occupation was a skilled
trade, and 58 who appear to be semi-skilled ..
60. These two individual convicts had been sentenced to servitude for trivial crimes as a
result of the chaos of the new technology of The Industrial Revolution, which
commenced in Britain causing great social dislocation.
61. Many convicts were either skilled tradesmen or farmers who had been convicted for
trivial crimes and were sentenced to seven years, the time required to set up the
infrastructure for the new colony. Convicts were often given pardons prior to or on
completion of their sentences and were allocated parcels of land to farm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Australia_(1788%E2%80%931850) ;
62. The 1788 convicts serving their apprenticed servitude that gave them the skills to
prosper and to be gainfully employed after serving their sentence. Instead I am to be
retired for the term of my natural life in Coventry for a crime committed by others and
prohibited from gainful employment.
THE CHRONOLOGY OF CRIME
In 1981 the criminal assault occurs and is corroborated (belief of civil tort CT)
63. On 9 Sept 1987; 2 Oct 1978 the criminal assault is expressed to the Chief Officer, Bill
Reay; Personnel Officer Alan Grunsell; Union Secretary John Slade; (belief CT) Ref
26 Page Chronology pages 19 & 22 therein;
64. In the early 90s consultation with my clinical psychologist Dr Nicholas Marlowe I
express the criminal assault {CT};
65. On 16 Nov 1994 Dr Rod Milton, a Forensic Psychiatrist report in sent to Fire
Brigades OH&S physician, John Pearce, the assault is described at para 11 [which
is given to DP Hennessy ADT and DP Sams NSWIRC (as well as Dr Marlowes report
to Sams which he removed from evidence)] {CT}
66. On 1 May 1995 the criminal assault is expressed in detail to my WC Lawyers in
Garfield Barwick Chambers {CT};

12 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

67. On 2 May 1995 my WC Lawyers obtain Dr Marlowes report expressing the criminal
assault. {CT};
68. On 12 May I give my WC Lawyers the 26 page Chronology detailing the assault and
the names of those involved Ref 26 Page Chronology pages 19 & 22 {CT};
Law Officers do not inform Police of crime and I am retired in lieu of dismissal 5 July
1995 and restored on 7 July 2003 {CT};
69. Law Officers deceive Workers Comp Court Mar 1996 that assault occurred {CT};
70. From 1995 to 2013 I submitted the 26 page Chronology and other medical reports to
Government Law Officers and HCCC, State Super, HealthQuest and Judicial Officers.
{CT};
71. In 2010 Task Force SIME investigates criminal assault on many Fire Brigades
members, by which time I realise the crimes committed by Fire Brigades. VC
Lawyers, Napier Keen are engaged etc {crime not prosecuted -CNP};
72. On 11 Aug 2014 Victims Rights Commission determine and confirm on balance of
probabilities criminal assault against me. But deny Compensation {CNP}
73. On 18 Sept 2014 appeal and sent review along with physical evidence to VRC {CNP}
74. On 1 Oct 2015 Victims Compensation deposited money into bank account and no
amended decision is forwarded.
75. On reflection I realise I am being set up yet again for another white wash to be
maintained on a criminalised existence for the term of my natural life.
76. I use the official reassessment of Victims Compensation form to submit a request to
de-novo investigation I return cheque to Justice Dept on 22 Aug 2016.{CNP}
77. UPDATE: No1-30 Aug phone call VRC/Justice Dept inform them of impending reports
1 & 2 {CNP} No2- 30 Aug letter VRC/Justice Dept to query sanity to overturn original
decision 14 Aug 2014 ref @5 {CNP};
78. CONCLUSION: no conviction no tort, no tort no justice {CNP};
DISCUSSION & RECOMMENDATIONS
79. In 1995 at least 10 Law Officers benefited from the criminal conspiracy by not
reporting the 1981 crime to NSW Police. In doing so they maintain their monopoly
for legal costs within the Workers Comp Jurisdiction, and contract out of the Workers
Comp Jurisdiction through a retirement that has now been established as being
condonation for a 1981 crime by the NSW Justice Departments Victims Rights
Commission possibly the reason for not issuing an amended decision of VRC
review ref @4;
80. I was placed in a position of being illegally retired by those responsible for crimes I

13 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

did not commit but was forced to carry the burden of those crimes;
81. The criminal negligence by Law Officers, is seen by other Law Officers as a no go
zone of Coventry for which for watchdog Law Officers such as the Ombudsman and
ICAC are complicit;
82. Similarly the Judicial decisions are manifestly corrupted by the removal of evidence
of criminal assault and completely incompetent decisions a no go NSW Jurisdiction
zone for me;
83. 26 April 1996, document I obtained under FOI with contrary Fire Brigades advice
that the Commutation was not approved for the second 26 Aug 1994 injury but
rather for a closed period for the first the injury 16/2/93 26/3/93 indicates a
problem in the Workers Comp due process ref pge 29;
84. The Superannuation Law is logically not meant to be a profitable enterprise also ref
Superannuation Act 1916 as is also the case under Federal Law;
85. If retirement pension had been required it would have been issued under S48
Breakdown pensioner held to be on leave and reassessment under S29 (4) (4A) &
reemployment under S49, S50 & S51 Superannuation Act 1916, and not for the term
of my natural life being similar for welfare recipients having to register with an
agency the NSW Government logically were responsible for my reemployment;
86. It is obvious to the Justice Department that the restoration feature of the
Superannuation Act 1916 S48 & S29(4) (4a) is not simply a legal fiction, put as legal
argument in NSW IRC (DP Sams) that required reemployment either by the Fire
Brigades or another NSW Government Department NB via State Super;
87. I am not receiving superannuation top up on my NSW State Super pension yet under
Federal Law you can go to jail unlike State Super pension members who receive the
top up, if they get caught working over the permitted hours, there is no Federal
Statutory Declaration to prosecute, which also has me committing fraud on two
occasions seeking redress for age discrimination;
a. The reason for my not receiving the top up in my State Pension as other members is
that I am not entitled to it if I have been declared fit as per July 2003 fitness
assessment under S29 (4) (4a) S50 Superannuation Act 1916;
88. Regardless I am forbidden to work for the term of my natural life thus being placed
in an unenviable position of committing illegal acts whilst carrying the burden for
others crimes in 1981 and 1995 and consequently being criminalised;
89. I am a current victim in a process of Coventry sanctioned by Government Law and
Judicial Officers: excerpt from Grose's The Dictionary of the Vulgar Tongue 1811: The
person sent to Coventry is considered as absent; no one must speak to or answer any

14 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

question he asks, except relative to duty, under penalty of being also sent to the same
place the heralded statement by Doug Messenger proves the Fire Brigades practice
of cruel and usual punishment was given sanction by Law and Judicial Officers;
90. HOWEVER I SHOULD BE RESTORED TO A POSITION I WOULD HAVE BEEN AT IF THE
CIRCUMSTANCES OF CRIME HAD BEEN REPORTED BY LAW OFFICERS IN 1995;

91. I have made both 1st and 2nd reports Private and Confidential and include the
condition of response ref @6. I request that the current Federal Attorney General,
Senator George Brandis QC, provide me a safe transition to be prosecuted for
breach of the Federal Statutory Declaration, NB There are issues as well with the
fraud against Transgrid and CCGT, and I can find no one to represent me and under
the Australian Constitution I can receive counsel:
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (The Constitution) 1900 - S80 Trial by jury:
provides: S80 - The trial on indictment of any offence against any law of the
Commonwealth shall be by jury, and every such trial shall be held in the State where the
offence was committed, and if the offence was not committed within any State the trial
shall be held at such place or places as the Parliament prescribes;
92. I would ask that the State Attorney General Hon Gabrielle Upton, MP, notify the
Department of Justice asap, of my reports, as per ref @1 review of Victims Rights;
93. The only legal advice that appears adequate was given to me was from Australias
former most senior Law Officer, Attorney General, Nicola Roxon, with respect of my
Federal breach ref page 18 to go to a police station;
THE REASONS FOR FEDERAL PROSECUTION
94. In practical terms by mitigating my crime I can present my Victims Impact Statement
to a jury in a Federal Court under the Constituted Jury system;
95. The Victims Rights and Support under NSW Justice System by all account of their
deleterious behaviour will not prosecute Law Officers who did not report the crime to
police in 1995, which caused an illegal retirement in lieu of dismissal, therefore being
punished for crimes committed against me;
96. The 1788 mature aged apprenticed convicts were allowed to contribute to society
after their servitude I expect nothing less if serving a sentence for the Federal
breach.
Signed:
Charles H. Norville; date: 26 Sept 2016
666.tar.feathers@gmail.com
Encl

15 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

ATTACHMENTS:
Page 17 VR&CA 2013 VC assessment form to de-novo with inter alia notation of cheque
attachment;
Page 18 Letter of advice from former Federal Attorney General to report to police;
Page 19 PK Simpson Cost Agreement Terms and Conditions nb para 12 not to
investigate negligence;
Page 20 PK Simpson Orders and Awards from Workers Comp Court dated 15 Mar 1996;
Page 21 PK Simpson cover sheet to WC Orders dated 28 Oct 1996;
Page 22 Front page to WC Consent Orders stipulating date from 26 Aug 1994 as per Mar
1996;
Page 23 signed Consent Orders of legislative inclusions of WC Consent dated as per Mar
1996;
Page 24 Cover sheet to Short Minutes Of Orders dated 15 Mar 1996;
Page 25 The Commencement of WC Proceedings, the preamble with PKS barrister, V.
Jurisich;
Page 26 Page 1 Transcript by PKS barrister V. Jurisich NB victimisation and ie no
criminal assault;
Page 27 Page 2 Transcript by Jurisich 2nd page and Judge makes orders and I stand
down;
Page 28 Page 3 Transcript Jurisich asks for set time for matter to be certified;
Page 3 Transcript cont Judge states to get consent from other side, to put it in, and Judge
will initial it;
Page 29 24 April 1996 Fire Brigades WC section only accept 1st claim in 1993 and decline
the above 2nd claim for 1994 in medical advice an indication of confusion of due
process.
Page 30-31 State Super informs Fire Brigades, Personnel Officer Doug Messenger of
restored fitness from retirement 7 July 2003 and seeking advice on reemployment letter
dated 12 Aug 2003;
Page 32 State Super letter 5 Mar 2004 indicating various hindrances by Fire Brigades,
Doug Messenger on reemployment;
Page 33-34 Fire Brigades, Doug Messenger response dated 17 Aug 2004: refutes
medical fitness creating extrajudicial and adversarial approach to unemploy me. This is
Rule by Law by institutionalised corruption.

16 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

17 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

18 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

19 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

20 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

21 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

22 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

23 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

24 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

25 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

26 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

27 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

28 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

29 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

30 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

31 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

32 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

33 of 34

2nd REPORT TO AUSTRALIAN ATTORNEY GENERALS

34 of 34