Individual Teacher Performance Review Form

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM
MASTER TEACHER I & II (Secondary)

NAME OF EMPLOYEE: ____________________________________
POSITION:
____________________________________
REVIEW PERIOD:
____________________________________
BUREAU/CENTER/SERVICE/DIVISION: _______________________
NAME OF RATEE:
POSITION:
DATE OF REVIEW:
_________________________
_________________________
_________________________
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING

MFO
KRA's
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
WEIGHT
PER KRA
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
Delivery of
Professional
1.Participated in seminars,
100% of trainings and seminars were
Basic
Growth and
workshops, trainings or serve
participated/facillitated and re-echoed within 2
Education
Development
as facilitator within the school
Sevices
20%
year (school, district, division,
June - March
5%
weeks which were rated excellently by the

participants.
regional & national)

5%
2.Prepared reports about the school

concerns/problems, awards and
Year-round
100% of school reports were prepared and

submitted on or before due dates.
promotions
3.Participated in the planning and
implementation of training
programs in school/district/
100% of planning and implementation

Year-round
5%
training programs of the school/district/division

were participated.
division level
4.Designed training matrices for
teachers (INSET, Professional
Designed 100% of training matrices for

Twice a year
5%
teachers
Meetings, etc)
Instructional
1. Carried regular teaching load
Competence
for the grade/subject areas.
50%
100% of regular teaching load were carried out

June- March
excellently during the rating period.

15%
ACTUAL
RESULTS
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
MFO
KRA's
OBJECTIVES
TIMELINE
WEIGHT
PER KRA
2. Assisted the School Head

in implementing school programs/
100% of daily lesson plans/ logs and visual
June- March
20%
aids related to the lesson were prepared
projects
3. Obtained 75% of the students
100% of the 75% of the students attained an
attained an average of 80%

proficiency in the required
ACTUAL
RESULTS
June- March
15%
average of 80% proficiency in the required

competencies were obtained.
competencies
Instructional
1.Observed 100% of the teachers
100% of the teachers under your supervision
Supervision
every quarter
were observed, conferred immediately and

June-March
30%
10%
suggestions/ recommendations were

excellently complied with by the teacher
every quarter within the year
2.Conducted 3 mentoring/ coaching

activities and prepared
instructional materials quarterly

10%
3.Guided co-teachers in the

performance of duties and
responsibilities based from the
received coaching/mentoring services, have

improved and submitted outputs immediately
100% of the teachers under supervision
5%
were guided in the performance of duties and

responsibilities in accordance with RPMS
RPMS
4.Checked regularlythe LP/DLL of
teachers under supervision
100% of the teachers' lesson plans under your

5%
supervision were checked and reviewed

once a week
TOTAL
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
RANGE
ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000
Outstanding
3.500-4.499
Very Outstanding
2.500-3.499
Satisfactory
1.500-2.499
Unsatisfactory
Below 1.999
Poor
Approving Authority:
RATER
RATEE
PRINCIPAL/ SCHOOL HEAD
_____________________________
_____________________________
_____________________________
AVERAGE
RATING
SCORE
AVERAGE
RATING
SCORE
INCIPAL/ SCHOOL HEAD
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

RATING SCALE FOR MASTER TEACHER I & II Secondary
MAJOR FINAL
OUTCOMES
Delivery of Basic
Education Services
KEY RESULT AREA

(KRA)
OBJECTIVES
1. Participated in seminar, workshops,

KRA Professional
trainings or serve as facilitators within the
100% of trainings and seminars participated
Growth and
school year (school, district, division, regional
and re-echoed within 2 weeks
Development (20%)
& national)
2. Prepared reports about the

schoolconcerns/ problems awards and
promotions.
3. Participated in the planning and

implementation of training programs in
school/district/division level
4. Designed training matrices for teachers

(INSET, Professional meetings, etc.)
RATING SCALE
100% of school reports were prepared and

submitted
100% of the planning and implementation of

training programs of the school/ district/
division were participated
100% of training matrices for teachers were

designed within the year
E
Q
KRA Instructional
Competence (50%) 2. Prepared up-to-date, complete and
functional lesson plans/daily logs and
instructional materials
100% of regular teaching load were carried

out excellently during the rating period.
100% of daily lesson plans/logs and visual
aids related to the lesson were prepared
100%
90-99%
80-89%
Excellent evaluation were

obtained (4.00-5.00)
Very Satisfactory (3.003.99)
Satisfactory
2.99)
(2.00-
T
E
2 weeks after training

100%
Prepared school reports

with no error
3-5 days before due date
On due date
100%
90-99%
80-99%
Acted as Over-allChairman
Acted as Co-Cahirman
Acted as Committee
Chairman
T
E
4 times
100%
3 times
90-99%
2 times
80-99%
3 weeks
90-99%
with 1-2 errors
4 weeks
80-89%
with minor errors
Prepared training matrices Prepared training matrices Prepared training matrices

with no error
with 1-2 errors
with minor errors
2 weeks before due date
E
Q
T
E
Q
100
Excellent
330 minutes
100
Excellent
90-99.99
Very Satisfactory
310-320
90-99.99
Very Satisfactory
80.89.99
Satisfactory
280-300
80-89.99
Satisfactory
180 days
140-179 days
120-139 days
T
1. Carried regular teaching load for the
grade/ subject areas.
MAJOR FINAL
OUTCOMES
KEY RESULT AREA

(KRA)
OBJECTIVES
E
3. 80% of the students attained an average

of 75% proficiency in the required
competencies
Delivery of Basic
Education Services
100% of the 80% of the students attained an

avrage of 75% proficiency in the required
competencies were obtained
1. Observed 100% of the teachers every

quarter
100
90-99.99
80.89.99
80% of the students

75-79% of the students
attained an average of 75% attained an average of attained an average of 75%
proficiency in the required
75% proficiency in the proficiency in the required
competencies
required competencies
competencies
Every Quarter
3 Quarters
2 Quarters
Observed 100% of the

teachers under your
supervision
Observed 90-99% of the

teachers under your
supervision
Observed 75-89% of the

teachers under your
supervision
100% suggestions/
recommendations given
have been excellently
demonstrated/ complied
with
90-99% suggestions/
with
75-89% suggestions/
with
2. Conducted 3 mentoring /coaching

activities and prepared instructional materials received coaching/ mentoring services, have
available quarterly
improved and submitted outputs immediately
T
KRA Instructional
Supervision 30%

were observed, conferred immediately and
suggestions/ recommendations were
excellently complied with by the teacher every
quarter within the year
RATING SCALE
3
Conferred with the teacher

immediately after the
2 days after the
a day after the observation
observation
observation
100% of the teachers

under your supervision
received mentoring/
coaching services
90-99% of the teachers

received mentoring/
coaching services

received mentoring/
coaching services
MAJOR FINAL
OUTCOMES
KEY RESULT AREA

(KRA)
OBJECTIVES
3. Guided co-teachers in the performance of 100% of the teachers under your supervision
duties and responsibilities based from the
were guided and submitted the output with no
RPMS
error on time

have improved

have improved

have improved
RATING SCALE
3
Submitted the TQC outputs

Submitted the TQC
Submitted the TQC outputs
in 5 days after the conduct outputs in 10 days after
in 15 days after the
of the TQC
the conduct of the TQC
conduct of the TQC
90-99% of the number

100% of the number of
teachers under your
teachers under your
teachers under your
supervision were
supervision were evaluated
supervision were evaluated
evaluated based from the
based from the RPMS
based from the RPMS
RPMS

accomplished the IPCRF
with no error
Submitted the IPCRF

outputs on time
Submitted the IPCRF

Submitted the IPCRF
outputs a day after the due outputs two days after the
date
due date
All lesson plans were

checked and reviewed
once a week
90-99% of the lesson 75-89% of the lesson plans

plans were checked and
were checked and
reviewed once a week
Submitted the MTs

accomplishment log on
time
100% of the teachers' lesson plan under your

4. Checked regularly lesson plans of
supervision were checked and reviewed once
teachers in the assigned grade/subject area
a week

with no error
Submitted the MTs

accomplishment log

with no error
Submitted the MTs

accomplishment log once
every end of the month
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
RANGE
ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000
Outstanding
3.500-4.499
Very Outstanding
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
RANGE
ADJECTIVAL RATING
2.500-3.499
Satisfactory
1.500-2.499
Unsatisfactory
RANGE
Below 1.999
ADJECTIVAL RATINGS
ADJECTIVAL RATING
Poor
SCALE
2
70-79.99%
Below 70
Unsatisfactory
1.99)
(1.00-
Poor (0-0.99)
5 weeks
70-79.99%
6 weeks or more
Below 70%

with major revision
Needs total revision
1-5 days after due date
2 weeks or more after due

date
70-79.99
Below 70
Acted as Co- Committee

Chairman
Acted as Committee
Member
Once
70-79.99%
Never
Below 70
Prepared training matrices

with major revision
Needs total revision
On due date
Late submission
70.79.99
Unsatisfactory
240-260
70-79.99
Unsatisfactory
below 70
Poor
below 240
below 70
Poor
100-119 days
below 100 days
SCALE
2
70.79.99
below 70

attained an average of
75% proficiency in the
60% of the students

attained an average of
75% proficiency in the
1 Quarter
At the end of the school

year only
Observed 65-74% of the Observed 64% and below

teachers under your
of the teachers under your
supervision
supervision
65-74% suggestions/
with
64% suggestions/
with
Conferred with the teacher Conferred with the teacher

3 days after the
beyond 4 days after the
observation
observation
51-74% of the teachers 50% of the teachers under

under your supervision your supervision received
received mentoring/
mentoring/ coaching
coaching services
services

50% and below of the
teachers under your
have improved
supervision have improved
SCALE
2
Submitted the TQC

outputs in 20 days after
the conduct of the TQC
Submitted the TQC

outputs a month after the
conduct of the TQC

69% of the number
teachers under your
teachers under your
supervision were
supervision were
evaluated based from the evaluated based from the
RPMS
RPMS
51-74% of the teachers 50% of the teachers under
your supervision
accomplished the IPCRF accomplished the IPCRF
with no error
with no error
Submitted the IPCRF
Submitted the IPCRF
outputs three days after outputs four or mored days
the due date
after the due date
65-74% of the lesson

plans were checked and
50% of the lesson plans

were checked and
Submitted the MTs

Submitted the MTs
accomplishment log once accomplishment log once

Individual Teacher Performance Review Form

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Individual Teacher Performance Review Form

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

MASTER TEACHER I & II (Secondary)

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING

100% of trainings and seminars were

workshops, trainings or serve

participated/facillitated and re-echoed within 2

as facilitator within the school

year (school, district, division,

weeks which were rated excellently by the

regional & national)

2.Prepared reports about the school

100% of school reports were prepared and

100% of planning and implementation

training programs of the school/district/division

Designed 100% of training matrices for

1. Carried regular teaching load

for the grade/subject areas.

100% of regular teaching load were carried out

excellently during the rating period.

2. Assisted the School Head

aids related to the lesson were prepared

excellently during the rating period.

3. Obtained 75% of the students

100% of the 75% of the students attained an

attained an average of 80%

average of 80% proficiency in the required

1.Observed 100% of the teachers

100% of the teachers under your supervision

were observed, conferred immediately and

suggestions/ recommendations were

2.Conducted 3 mentoring/ coaching

100% of the teachers under your supervision

3.Guided co-teachers in the

received coaching/mentoring services, have

were guided in the performance of duties and

100% of the teachers' lesson plans under your

supervision were checked and reviewed

PRINCIPAL/ SCHOOL HEAD

INCIPAL/ SCHOOL HEAD

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

KEY RESULT AREA

1. Participated in seminar, workshops,

2. Prepared reports about the

3. Participated in the planning and

4. Designed training matrices for teachers

100% of school reports were prepared and

100% of the planning and implementation of

100% of training matrices for teachers were

100% of regular teaching load were carried

Excellent evaluation were

Very Satisfactory (3.003.99)

2 weeks after training

Prepared school reports

3-5 days before due date

1-2 days before due date

Prepared training matrices Prepared training matrices Prepared training matrices

6-8 days before due date

3-5 days before due date

KEY RESULT AREA

3. 80% of the students attained an average

100% of the 80% of the students attained an

1. Observed 100% of the teachers every

80% of the students