8 views

Uploaded by rohanZorba

Lecture 27

- soil and foundation hand book
- Main Presentation Ground Anchors and Anchor Systems
- Lab Report #3- Consolidation
- 0662
- INSITU GEOTECHNICAL TESTS
- Piles foundation presentation
- SANS 10400 A 2010
- Astm d4767 Cu
- geotechmanual_all_07.pdf
- Pb 286504
- Chapter 07 Solution groundwater fundamentals
- Piles Under Dynamic Loads
- CAL HS RAILWAY TM 2.3.2 Structure Design Loads
- 1French8NCEE-001072SubgradeModulus
- Piled Raft
- Embankment over swampy areas.pdf
- Taranto Tubular piles
- geoteknic
- Soil Pile Capacity
- Procurement Guidance Evaluation Criteria

You are on page 1of 13

Module 5

CONSOLIDATION (Lectures 27 to 34)

Topics

1.1 FUNDAMENTS OF CONSOLIDATION

1.1.1 General Concepts of One-dimensional Consolidation

1.1.2 Theory of One-Dimensional Consolidation

1.1.3 Relations of and for Other Forms of Initial Excess Pore Water

Pressure Distribution

1.1.4 Numerical Solution for One-Dimensional Consolidation

1.1.6 Standard One-Dimensional Consolidation Test and Interpretation

1.1.7 Preconsolidation pressure.

Compression index

1.1.9 Calculation of coefficient of consolidation from laboratory test results

Logarithm-of-time method

Square-root-of-time method

1.1.11 Constant Rate-of-Strain consolidation Tests

Coefficient of consolidation

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

1.2.2 Free-Strain Consolidation with no Smear

1.2.3 Equal-Strain Consolidation with no Smear

1.2.4 Effect of Smear Zone on Radial Consolidation

1.2.5 Calculation of the Degree of Consolidation with Vertical and Radial

Drainage

1.2.6 Numerical Solution for Radial Drainage

PROBLEMS

Chapter 5

Lecture 27

Consolidation-1

Topics

1.1 FUNDAMENTS OF CONSOLIDATION

1.1.1 General Concepts of One-dimensional Consolidation

1.1.2 Theory of One-Dimensional Consolidation

According to Terzaghi (1943), a decrease of water content of a saturated soil without replacement of the

water by air is called a process of consolidation. When saturated clayey soils-which have a low coefficient

of permeability-are subjected to a compressive stress due to a foundation loading, the ore water pressure will

immediately increase; however, due to the low permeability of the soil, there will be a time lag between the

application of load and the extrusion of the pore water and, thus, the settlement. This phenomenon is the

subject of discussion of this chapter.

1.1.1 General Concepts of One-dimensional Consolidation

To understand the basic concepts of consolidation, consider a clay layer of thickness located below the

groundwater level and between two highly permeable sand layers as shown in figure 1. If a surcharge of

intensity is applied at the ground surface over a very large area, the pore water pressure in the clay layer

will increase. For a surcharge of infinite extent, the immediate increase of the pore water pressure, , at all

depths of the clay layer will be equal to the increase of the total stress, . Thus, immediately after the

application of the surcharge.

Figure 1

=

Since the total stress is equal to the sum of the effective stress and the pore water pressure at all depth soft

the clay layer the increase of effective stress due to the surcharge (immediately after application) will be

equal to zero (i.e., = 0, where is the increase of the effective stress). In other words, at time t = 0,

the entire stress increase at all depths of the clay is taken by the pore water pressure and none b y the soil

skeleton. This is shown in figure 2a. (It must be pointed out that, for loads applied over a limited area, it

may to be true that the increase of the pore water pressure is equal to the increase of vertical stress at any

depth at time t = 0.

Figure 2 Change of pore water pressure and effective stress in the clay layer

shown in figure 1 due to the surcharge

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

After application of the surcharge (i.e., at time > 0), the water in the void spaces of the clay layer will be

squeezed out and will flow toward both the highly permeable sand layers, thereby reducing the excess pore

water pressure. This, in turn, will increase the effective stress by an amount since + = . Thus, at

time > 0,

> 0

And <

This fact is shown in figure 2b.

Theoretically, at time = , the excess pore water pressure at all depths of the clay layer will be dissipated

by gradual drainage. Thus, at time = ,

=

And = 0

This shown in figure 2c.

This gradual process of increase of effective stress in the clay layer due to the surcharge will result in a

settlement which is time-dependent and is referred to as the process of consolidation.

The theory for the time rate of one-dimensional consolidation was first proposed by Terzaghi (1925). The

underlying assumption in the derivation of the mathematical equations are as follows:

consolidation

1. The clay layer is homogeneous.

2. The clay layer is saturated.

3. The compression of the soil layer is due to the change in volume only, which, in turn, is due to the

squeezing out of water from the void spaces.

4. Darcys law valid.

5. Deformation of soil occurs only in the direction of the load application.

6. The coefficient of consolidation [equation (15)] is constant during the consolidation.

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

With the above assumptions, let us consider a clay layer of thickness 1 as shown in figure 3. The layer is

located between two highly permeable sand layers. In this case of one-dimensional consolidation, the flow

of water into and out of the soil element is in one direction only, i.e., in the z direction. This means that

, , , are equal to zero, and thus the rate of low into and out of the soil element can be given

by:

+ = rate of change of volume of soil element

(1)

Where =

(2)

we obtain

2

2 =

(3)

(4)

where is the unit weight of water. Substitution of equation (4) and (3) and rearranging gives

2

2

(5)

During consolidation the rate of change of volume is equal to the rate of change of the void volume. So,

(6)

=

(7)

Where is the volume of soil solids in the element, which is constant, and is the void ratio. So,

= = 1+ =

1+

(8)

2

2

= 1+

(9)

The change in void ratio, , is due to the increase of effective stress; assuming that these are linearly

related, then

= ( )

(10)

2

2

= 1+

=

(12)

(13)

6

Or

(14)

(15)

Equation (14) is the basic differential equation of Terzaghis consolidation theory and can be solved with

proper boundary conditions. To solve the equation, assume u to be the product of two functions, i.e., the

product of a function of z and a function of t, or

= ()

So,

(16)

= ()

And 2 = 2 = ()

(17)

(18)

= () or

()

()

()

()

(19)

The right-hand side of equation (19) is a function of z only and is independent of t; the left-hand side of the

equation is a function of t only and is independent of z. therefore, they must be equal to a constant, say- 2 .

So,

= 2 ()

(20)

= 1 cos + 2 sin

(21)

Again, the right-hand side of equation (19) may be written as

= 2 ()

(22)

= 3 exp

(2 )

(23)

= (1 cos + 2 sin )3 exp

(2 )

= (4 cos + 5 sin )exp

( 2 )

(24)

Where 4 = 1 3 5 = 2 3 .

The constants in equation (24) can be evaluated from the boundary conditions, which are as follows:

1. At time = 0, = (initial excess pore water pressure at any depth).

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

2. = 0 = 0.

3. = 0 = = 2.

Note that H is the length of the longest drainage path. In this case, which is two-way drainage condition (top

and bottom of the clay layer), H is equal to half the total thickness of the clay layer, .

The second boundary condition dictates that 4 = 0, and from the third boundary condition we get

5 sin 2 = 0

2 =

Where n is an integer. From the above, a general solution of equation (24) can be in given the form

=

=

=1

2 2

(25)

To satisfy the first boundary condition, we must have the coefficients of such that

=

=1

(26)

1

(27)

=

= 1 2

=1

sin

2 2

4

(28)

So far we have not made any assumptions regarding the variation of with the depth of the clay layer.

Several possible types of variation for are considered below.

Constant with depth. if is constant with depth i.e., if = (figure 4) referring to equation

(28),

2

0

1

sin = 2 (1 cos )

2

So, =

= 2

=1

(1 cos )

2 2

4

(29)

drainage)

Note that the term 1 cos in the above equation is zero for cases when n is even; therefore, u is also

zero. For the nonzero terms, it is convenient to substitute = 2 + 1, where m is an integer. So equation

(29) will no read

=

2

=

=0 (2 +1)

= 2

=0

[1 cos(2 + 1)]sin

(2m+1)z

2H

exp

(2 )

(2 +1)2 2

4

(30)

Where = 2 + 1 /2. At a given time, the degree of consolidation at any depth z is defined as

=

=

=1 = =

(31)

Where is the increase of effective stress at a depth z due to consolidation. From equations (30) and (31),

= 1

= 2

=0

exp

(2 )

(32)

Figure 5 shows the variation of with depth for various values of the non-dimensional time factor, ;

these curves are called isocrones.

In most cases, however, we need to obtain the average degree of consolidation for the entire layer. This is

given by

=

(1/ ) 0 (1/ ) 0

(1/ ) 0

(33)

The average degree of consolidation is also the ratio of consolidation settlement at any time to maximum

consolidation settlement. Note, in this case, that = 2 = .

Combining equations (30) and (33),

= 1

= 2

=0 2

exp

(2 )

(34)

Figure 6 Variation of average degree of consolidation (for conditions given in figs. 4, 7, 8, and 9)

Terzaghi suggested the following equations for to approximate the values obtained from equation (34):

10

For = 0 53%:

For = 53 100%:

% 2

100

(35)

(36)

Sivaram and Swamee (1977) gave the following equation for varying from 0 to 100%:

%

100

(4 /)0.5

= [1+(4 /)2.8]0.179

(37)

(/4)( %/100)2

Or = [1(

(38)

5.6 0.357

%/100) ]

Equations (37) and (38) give an error in of less than 1% for 0%< < 90% and less than 3% for

90%< < 100%.

Table 1 Variation of [equation (34)

%

0

10

20

30

35

40

45

50

55

0

0.008

0.031

0.071

0.096

0.126

0.159

0.197

0.238

%

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

0.287

0.342

0.403

0.478

0.567

0.684

0.848

1.127

It must be pointed out that, if we have a situation of one-way drainage as shown in figure 7a and b,

equation (34) would still be valid. Note, however, that the length of the drainage path is equal to the total

thickness of the clay layer.

Figure 7 Initial excess pore pressure distribution-one way drainage, constant with depth

Dept. of Civil Engg. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur

11

Linear variation of . The linear variation of the initial excess pore water pressure, as shown in figure 8,

may be written as

= 1 2

(39)

Figure 8 linearly varying initial excess pore water pressure distribution-two-way drainage

= 1 2

=1 0

1 2

2 2

4

(40)

The average degree of consolidation can be obtained by solving equations (40) and 33):

= 1

= 2

=0 2

exp

(2 )

12

This is identical to equation (34), which was for the case where the excess pore water pressure is constant

with depth, and so the same curves as given in figure 6 can be used.

Sinusoidal variation of . Sinusoidal variation (figure 9) can be represented by the equation

= 3 2

(41)

The solution for the average degree of consolidation for this type of excess pore water pressure distribution

is of the form

= 11

2

4

(42)

13

- soil and foundation hand bookUploaded byMREFAAT
- Main Presentation Ground Anchors and Anchor SystemsUploaded byMirza Waqar Baig
- Lab Report #3- ConsolidationUploaded bythulf
- 0662Uploaded bylim kang hai
- INSITU GEOTECHNICAL TESTSUploaded bylenana
- Piles foundation presentationUploaded bySaad Iqbal
- SANS 10400 A 2010Uploaded byRaul Lirola Lopez
- Astm d4767 CuUploaded byMahesh Jallu
- geotechmanual_all_07.pdfUploaded byAgam Elfarabie
- Pb 286504Uploaded byjinesh shah
- Chapter 07 Solution groundwater fundamentalsUploaded byAbu Naser
- Piles Under Dynamic LoadsUploaded byB S Praveen Bsp
- CAL HS RAILWAY TM 2.3.2 Structure Design LoadsUploaded bystructural engineer 02
- 1French8NCEE-001072SubgradeModulusUploaded byAbdelkader Gamal
- Piled RaftUploaded byAnonymous bVFHov
- Embankment over swampy areas.pdfUploaded byernestnsabimana74
- Taranto Tubular pilesUploaded byNitaiGauranga108
- geoteknicUploaded byNurali Mamen
- Soil Pile CapacityUploaded bymayuresh
- Procurement Guidance Evaluation CriteriaUploaded bymchkpp
- 7-Deep Foundations 1Uploaded byAsad Hafudh
- M-TECH GEOTECH SYLLABUSUploaded bySUNILKHUNTIA1988
- APT Shoring Drawings From Various ProjectUploaded byBinSayeed
- 2005 Lab.pdfUploaded byRonald Macazana
- V 7 i 2201209171384215866Uploaded byRatulKumarMajumdar
- Braced CutsUploaded byDipak Borsaikia
- Soil & FoundationsUploaded byChristian Nicolaus Mbise
- Tranche 2 Implementation Consultants TORUploaded bySujat
- 0013805000Uploaded byThắng Hồ
- c-2Uploaded byDGW

- ##1Uploaded byrohanZorba
- Shape Code CalculatorUploaded byrohanZorba
- DRG-AKA-165709-00155_RT_140519Uploaded byrohanZorba
- CV Naresh TyagiUploaded byrohanZorba
- AUploaded byrohanZorba
- Doc1Uploaded byrohanZorba
- 132357-ATK-SCH-EAC-000001 - RT_131017Uploaded byrohanZorba
- Paternity Leave Requisition RohanTyagiUploaded byrohanZorba
- NovemberUploaded byrohanZorba
- requirements.txtUploaded byrohanZorba
- Resume Rohan TyagiweweUploaded byrohanZorba
- 134307-APB-SCH-EOH-200003Uploaded byrohanZorba
- Result Summary - STUploaded byrohanZorba
- Result Summary - ST4Uploaded byrohanZorba
- 001 R0 RNT Design of Closed PortionUploaded byrohanZorba
- 002-RB-RNT-DESIGN OF INTEGRAL PIERS AND PILES.xlsxUploaded byrohanZorba
- 001 R0 SSC Earth PressureUploaded byrohanZorba
- G334Q97ApplicationForm.pdfUploaded byrohanZorba
- Stsaip Asa Drg Eac 000081Uploaded byrohanZorba
- New Microsoft Word DocumentUploaded byrohanZorba
- New Microsoft Word Document.docxUploaded byrohanZorba
- L3SIG11303_2G05Uploaded byrohanZorba
- L2TRK2049 -Cant and Curve OverthrowUploaded byrohanZorba
- New Microsoft Word Document.docxUploaded byrohanZorba
- LIST of BRS-SC Drawings.pdfUploaded byrohanZorba
- Tyagi Rohan - January 2017Uploaded byrohanZorba
- Tyagi Rohan - January 2017Uploaded byrohanZorba

- DIN 2393-2Uploaded byYalavarthi Chandrasekhar
- Chemistry 4thUploaded bybawcock
- Biogeochemical Cycles Ppt (1)Uploaded byd g
- aluminium weldUploaded byAnush Swaminathan
- Full Aperture Optical Polishing Process_Overview and ChallengesUploaded byrajkpal3542
- Algae WWT Biodiesel 5Uploaded byshortk06
- CalorimetryUploaded byHannah Yuson
- Journal for Electroplating Industries2Uploaded bySunny Trivedi
- the strength of cain linksUploaded byeduarvesan1597
- Civil Engineering Project TitlesUploaded byShamsUlislam
- Shaft Seal CatalogUploaded bySadiza Nasution
- RCC32R Rigorous Ribbed Slabs.xlsUploaded byCioabla Bogdan
- The Invitro Effect of 2% Chlorhexidine on DentinhardnessUploaded byDaniel Iriarte
- SemiconductorsUploaded byMaría González Domínguez
- Series A 72Uploaded byAnonymous cGM3hW
- A Bistable Shape Memory Microswitch With High Energy DensityUploaded byTerence Deng
- Chemistry 1 - Class XIIUploaded bySunil Nahata
- 1-s2.0-S209526861730513X-mainUploaded byeugie
- 2CV.4.8_ProceedingsUploaded bySyarif Hidayat
- rapid tooling ppt.pptUploaded byRavi Parikh
- SAIC-L-2014 Rev 0Uploaded bysa
- Chemistry Jan2012 unit-4 QPUploaded byAkila Rahman
- RTS Chemistry SPM Question Bank Chapter 5Uploaded bydobbybibi
- Sustainbility Textbook 3Uploaded byJavier Solano
- Panduan Triple RinsingUploaded byAurudy
- Paper for Aero India 09Uploaded byGuru75
- The FlowTube SystemUploaded bySalvador Parra Fernandez
- ch14Uploaded bySingAnn
- A-review-of-the-hardened-mechanical-properties-of.pdfUploaded byIngeniero Estructural
- Prevention and Control of Weld DistortionUploaded byhitbalsara