3 views

Uploaded by Μιχάλης Μέντζος

Experimental Study Of Centrifugal

- 1 Fluids and their Properties.pdf
- Hydrodynamics
- A Comprehensive Mechanistic Model for Upward Two-Phase Flow in Wellbores
- B.E. (Civil Engineering) Syllabus
- Reynolds Number
- CVE334 Courseware
- Fluid Flow Rev03web
- pbr-5025
- 191264286-SpiraxSarco-The-Steam-and-Condensate-Loop-Block-1-14.pdf
- Turbulent Heat Transfer to Non-Newtonian Fluids in Circular Tubes
- Ch 4 Drilling Hydraulics
- Lecure 1 Fluid Mechanics
- 2014_Wen-Guang Li _Mechanism for Onset of Sudden-Rising Head Effect in Centrifugal Pump When Handling Viscous Oils
- a must read
- 64241
- Fluids and Thermo Revision Notes
- Section 7
- Two Phase Flow in Well-flowlines
- Section 16
- Pump preformance

You are on page 1of 14

Experimental Study of Centrifugal Pump Handling Viscous Fluid and TwoPhase Flow

G. M. Paternost, Petrobras, A. C. Bannwart, State University of Campinas, and V. Estevam, Petrobras

This paper was prepared for presentation at the SPE Artificial Lift Conference-Americas held in Cartagena, Colombia, 21-22 May 2013.

This paper was selected for presentation by an SPE program committee following review of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper have not been

reviewed by the Society of Petroleum Engineers and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material does not necessarily reflect any position of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, its

officers, or members. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this paper without the written consent of the Society of Petroleum Engineers is prohibited. Permission to

reproduce in print is restricted to an abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must contain conspicuous acknowledgment of SPE copyright.

Abstract

This paper presents an experimental study about the performance of a centrifugal pump as a function of the liquid

viscosity and intake free gas fraction. The first part evaluates a pump performance map proposed by Tulsa University Artificial

Lift Projects (TUALP) for single-phase flow using dimensionless numbers, which considers the fluid properties, flow rate,

rotational speed and pump head for a generic centrifugal pump. The second part analyses the pump performance parameters

under different liquid viscosities and free gas fractions, proposes a modification in the TUALP procedure based on well-know

dimensionless numbers, and suggests an extension of the analysis to incorporate the effect of the free gas fraction on the pump

performance.

Introduction

The flow within a centrifugal pump rarely follows the idealized model predicted by Euler equations. Among the main

hydraulic losses the frictional and shock losses stand out, the former caused by viscous dissipation within the impeller and

diffuser channels, and the latter due to local misalignment of the fluid velocity relative to the inlet of impeller and diffuser

blades. When the incoming fluid is accompanied by free gas, additional losses related to phase segregation must be taken into

account. There is currently no general model capable of predicting those losses; therefore the importance of experimental

studies is justified.

The pumping of viscous fluids reduces the head and also increases the brake power required by the pump. The

presence of free gas leads to further reduction of the head and efficiency. The degradation caused by the presence of gas spans

from a fluctuation in pressure - a phenomenon known as surging - to a gas locking condition, when the pump generates no

head and becomes economically unfeasible. Both the viscosity and the free gas effects are, evidently, geometry dependent.

Literature Review

Historically, the effects of fluid viscosity and two-phase flow on the performance of a centrifugal pump have been

studied separately because of the complexity of the flow inside the rotating curved channels. The first studies regarding liquidgas flow in pumps originated in the nuclear industry, motivated by a fundamental issue of safety (LOCA Loss of Coolant

Accident). A pioneer article dealing with the influence of gas bubbles in the pump performance was written by Minemura&

Murakami (1974), who identified that the head degradation is caused by a change of the flow pattern inside the impellers.

There are, however, restrictions to apply their results in the petroleum industry: the pumps used in the nuclear industry have

larger diameter, single stage and an axial geometry, whereas in oil wells they are relatively small, radial and with several

stages.

Lea & Bearden (1980) conducted the first experimental study using electrical submersible pumps (ESP) in the oil and

gas industry. They investigated the impact of free gas into two different benches under different conditions, one using air and

water and the other diesel and CO2. They found that the performance of a pump is dependent upon the free gas fraction and the

intake pressure.

Cirilo (1998) investigated the impact of the free gas fraction, intake pressure and rotational speed on the pump

performance. It was observed that the pump capacity to handle free gas increases with higher intake pressure. The author also

found that, given a certain gas percentage, there is a point at which the pump head increases with increasing flow rate. This

point is close to the limit at which surging begins, and no additional stable points can be taken for lower liquid flow rates.

Pessoa (2000) studied the pressure increase in each stage of a centrifugal pump. He found a poor performance at the

first stage, which sometimes produced negative head. This was attributed to the fact that possibly the first stage behaves as a

mixture homogenizer. The following stages, where the performance gradually improves, are indeed responsible for increasing

the pressure of the flow.

SPE 165028

Estevam (2002) built the first prototype for visualization of the flow inside an ESP impeller. Under certain conditions

the author identified the presence of a stationary bubble in the impeller entrance, whose length increased with increasing free

gas fractions, thus limiting the operational efficiency of the pump. The author also presented a correlation to predict the pump

performance under two-phase flow based on the conservation of mass and momentum.

Barrios (2007) analyzed the flow dynamics within a centrifugal pump, building a prototype to visualize the flow

inside the impeller. The author analyzed the flow patterns, bubble behavior and operating conditions that cause surging using a

camera to capture high frequency images.

Gamboa (2008) collected experimental data from both a 22-stage ESP and a laboratory transparent prototype stage,

which allowed visualization of the two-phase flow behavior phenomena in the impellers. These included the effects of fluid

properties (gas density and surface tension) and the formation of a stagnant gas pocket associated with surging.

Trevisan (2009) was the only author that evaluated the head degradation caused by viscosity and two-phase flow

altogether. He modified the centrifugal pump used by Barrios and Gamboa, installing windows at the entrance, exit and inside

the channels of impellers to obtain images of the flow patterns for different gas fractions.

Monte Verde (2011) experimentally determined the effects of rotational speed, gas and liquid flow rates and intake

pressure on the performance of an ESP equipped with an AGH (Advanced Gas Handler), both built horizontally. The author

found that both the speed increase and the intake pressure impact in a similar way, increasing the pump capability to gas

handling. For the operational conditions tested, the AGH was inefficient.

Regarding viscous fluid flow, there are numerous correlations in the literature to predict head, flow rate and pump

efficiency, as the ones proposed by the Hydraulic Institute (1955) and Stepanoff (1957), among others. In 2009, TUALP

proposed dimensionless groups - specific capacity, specific head, specific speed and a parameter involving the fluid properties

to map the pump performance for different viscosities and rotational speeds. The correlations among these groups should be

obtained experimentally for each type of pump. This proposal is experimentally evaluated in the present study.

Test Facilities and Procedure

Fig. 1 shows the experimental facility used, which consisted of a closed circuit for liquid circulation and gas injection

upstream the test pump. A booster pump pumped the fluid from the 1.2 cubic meter separator tank to the test pump, a

vertically installed two-stage volute-type model 65330 made by Imbil Ita. The test pump was driven by a 5 HP motor

controlled by a variable speed drive (VSD). At a constant rotational speed, the liquid flow rate and the flow pressure were

controlled by a globe valve installed at the discharge of the test pump.

For the two-phase flow tests the pressure at the test pump intake was controlled through a VSD connected to the

booster pump motor. Pressurized air passed through a laminar flow element and a choke valve before entering the acrylic tube,

where the flow becomes two-phase.

The liquid coming from the booster flowed through a Coriolis meter and followed to the electric heater, which

increased the temperature and consequently reduced the viscosity of the liquid. The level of heating was controlled through the

power dissipated by the heater. Glycerin was the fluid chosen for the experiments, for which the electric heater allowed a

temperature variation from ambient up to 60 C, resulting viscosities in the 60-500 cP range. However, due to experimental

limitations, the two-phase tests required a lower viscosity which was achieved by adding water to the glycerin in a 6.8% water

fraction ratio, leading to a 25-250 cP viscosity range.

Dimensional Analysis

The dimensionless numbers proposed by TUALP (Solano, 2009) were obtained from the conservation of mass and

momentum equations along with the Euler equation. The relationships between these groups must be obtained experimentally,

since it relies on the geometry of the pump, which is unique to each model. According to the author, knowledge about the

behavior of centrifugal pumps working with viscous fluids will bring significant benefits to the industry, e.g., helping

manufacturers to design more efficient pumps for viscous fluids, increasing productivity and reducing engineering risk.

The proposed dimensionless equations are presented in Eqs. 1 through 4, and the following relationships exist

between them: = f1 (Rn, ) = f2 (Rn, NS) = f3 (, NS).

Specific Head =

.......................................................................................................................... (1)

,

...................................................................................................................... (2)

,

Specific Capacity =

Specific Speed =

....................................................................................................................................... (3)

Normalized Reynolds =

.................................................................................................................... (4)

SPE 165028

Solano considered Nmanuf = 3600 rpm, which refers to the experimental curve provided by the manufacturer (water at

3600 rpm). In this article, it is 806 rpm. The tests were run at a constant specific speed considering four distinct rotational

speeds - 612, 709, 806 and 950 rpm - and different viscosities. The specific head and specific capacity measured were recorded

for each point and plotted together. This is illustrated in Fig. 2 for a specific speed of 656. The points overlap each other and a

nearly linear relationship between the specific head and the specific capacity can be noticed. The exact relationship is not

expected to be linear for low flow rates since all the Ns curves should extrapolate to zero head at zero capacity.

The procedure was repeated for other specific speeds and the results presented the same behavior from Fig. 2, as

shown in Fig. 3. Note that higher speeds present performance closer to the water curve (Rn=1).

This validates the relation = f (, Ns), proposed by Solano, which proves to be an extension of the Stepanoff

correlation. Stepanoff stated that for a certain pump at a constant speed, the head-capacity decreases when the viscosity

increases, in such a way that the specific speed remains constant at the best efficiency point. As verified above, this correlation

is not restricted to the best efficiency point.

SPE 165028

Fig. 3 - Experimental tests at different specific speeds along with water performance curve

It is possible, using a simplified derivation and well-known dimensionless numbers, to achieve the same performance

map. For a given pump design, the head and brake horsepower should be dependent upon discharge, impeller diameter,

rotational speed, fluid density, viscosity, and geometrical characteristic; therefore, the following functional relationships are

valid:

gH = f (q, d, , , , ,) and = g (q, d, , , , ) ......................................................................................... (5)

This is a straightforward application of the Buckingham theorem. For each function in Eq. 5 there are seven

variables and three primary dimensions (Mass, Length and Time), corresponding to the following dimensionless groups:

Head coefficient =

Capacity coefficient =

Power coefficient =

Geometry parameters

.............................................................................................................................. (7)

............................................................................................................................... (8)

.................................................................................................................................. (6)

............................................................................................................................ (9)

........................................................................................................................................... (10)

The efficiency is already dimensionless and is uniquely related to the other three variables:

( 3 )( 2 2 )

3 5

............................................................................................................. (11)

To simplify the handling of the resulting numbers, the parameter X was defined as the inverse of Reynolds number:

................................................................................................................................................................ (12)

where the kinematic viscosity / is used in centistokes. The other units are used in SI Metric System. The variable X

must be considered whenever viscous fluids are involved. Since the affinity laws do not hold in these cases, the specific head

and specific capacity must depend on this additional variable.

Using the SI variables presented above, the specific speed is a combination of dimensionless numbers that can be

written in a functional form:

SPE 165028

=

5

()

............................................................................................................................................... (13)

Neglecting the geometry parameters, since they are manufacturing characteristics of the pump, the following relations

are valid:

= , = , =

................................................................................................................... (14)

Fig. 4 presents the results obtained for the proposed variables, showing the same behavior as in Fig. 3.

Ns=402

Ns=518

Ns=656

Ns=854

Water

To illustrate the map CH=f(CQ, X) some points were plotted separately to permit a clearly visualization. Fig. 5 shows

the results. As it can be noticed, the X variable can be represented by isolines which are similar to the water curve.

Additionally, it is possible to obtain an algebraic representation of the mapping CH=f(CQ, X). This is best done

through the development of a physical model where the relevant phenomena are accounted for. This is done in next section.

SPE 165028

Theoretical Model

Considering the relationships given by Eq.14, including the geometrical coefficients, and extending the analysis to the

brake horsepower and efficiency, it results:

=

=

= , , ............................................................................. (15)

= , ,

= , ,

............................................................................. (16)

.............................................................................. (17)

Separate analysis of the head and brake horsepower can be developed from basic concepts.

The pressure gain (or head) provided by the pump is defined by

cotg

= 1

where

d cotg

.

=

.......................................................................... (19)

The dissipative losses are assumed as the sum of frictional and shock losses:

The frictional loss is expressed by means of a friction factor, which can also be divided into an inertial term

(turbulent, which dominates at high flow rates) and a viscous term (dominating at low flow rates):

= ,

,

=

where =

=

+

=

+

........................................................... (21)

............................................................................................................. (22)

and = . Therefore:

................................................................. (23)

where expresses the viscous effects at high flow rates and should be considered in the range 0 < < 1. The

The shock loss is caused by a misalignment between the velocity vector and the rotor or diffuser blades. This effect

should disappear for q = q* (design flow rate, assumed shockless) and can be expressed in terms of the kinetic energies of the

rotor:

=

=

Thus:

=

1+

1

................................................................................................ (24)

........................................................................................... (25)

........................................................................................................ (26)

+

1

..................... (27)

SPE 165028

= 1

or:

= + +

+

+

......................................... (28)

........................... (29)

............................................................................................ (30)

It can be noted from Eq. 30 that the viscosity effects disappears at = 0. Losses related to leaks were not included

in the analysis. From the above derivation, the coefficients are assumed to depend only on the geometry parameters

and are constant for a given pump. These coefficients are expected to be positive except possibly . The five coefficients and

the exponent can be determined from data regression to fit the experimental head-capacity curves, provided the data cover a

wide range of CQ and X.

Brake horsepower-capacity curve analysis

The brake horsepower can be considered as the sum of

the hydraulic power transferred to the fluid

the power losses caused by the hydraulic fluid in the rotor and diffuser

the losses associated with the friction between the rotor and the surrounding fluid.

Since the sum of the two first corresponds to Eulers brake power, the following representation is suggested:

The frictional power loss caused by friction with the surrounding fluid can also be divided into two parts: one

resulting from the disk friction and another due to friction at the edge of the rotor:

= + .................................................................................................................................. (32)

The disk friction is assumed to have a viscous contribution and an inertial contribution:

= + .......................................................................................................................... (33)

Vortex generation at the edge of airfoils and blades is a well-known phenomenon. Fluid from high pressure side tends

to move to low pressure side creating dissipating part of the energy received from the blade (White, 2003). In the case of

multi-stage pumps, this effect is also influenced by the intermittency of the alignment between the rotor and diffuser blades.

Such intermittency occurs for any flow rate during two consecutive passages of the rotor blades by the point of alignment. The

dissipation caused by vortex generation can be assumed to increase with the flow rate, rotation speed and viscosity. The

following formulation in terms of viscous and inertial contributions is proposed:

= +

................................................................................................................................ (34)

Replacing the results expressed in Eq. 31 by Eqs. 19, 32, 33 and 34, it leads to:

=

+ + + +

= + + +

and dividing by :

or:

= +

+

+

+

............................................ (35)

....................................................... (36)

.............................................................. (37)

= + + + + ......................................................................................................... (38)

SPE 165028

From the derivation above, the coefficients are assumed to depend only on the geometry parameters

and are

constant for a given pump. These coefficients are expected to be positive except possibly . Again, the five coefficients can

be determined from a data regression to fit the experimental brake horsepower-capacity curves.

Experimental results

It was performed a numerical regression of Eq.30 to fit the experimental data. For this purpose, the kinematic

viscosity in parameter X was evaluated in centistokes. The resulting coefficients were a0 = 0.223513, a1 = 0, a2 = 0.732976, a3

= 2726.25, a4 = 0 and n = 0, and Fig. 6 shows the results of Eq. 30 compared to the experimental data. Most of the evaluated

points presented errors lower than 10%, showing quite satisfactory agreement with data. Thus, a CH=f(CQ, X) map which is

quadratic in CQ and linear in X provides a good representation of the pump behavior.

Fig. 7 shows the full map from the adjusted Eq. 30 extrapolated to the entire range. Note that CH tends to the water

head coefficient when CQ approaches zero. This happens because no flow occurs at this point also known as shut off

condition - and therefore there is no friction loss, so the viscosity has no impact. It can be concluded that fluid viscosity has

little or no influence in the CQ-quadratic nature of Eq. 30; however, viscosity strongly limits the maximum flow rate that the

pump may reach.

Ns

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

50

40

30

20

10

0

(water)

Fig. 7 Head-capacity map for the tested pump according to Eq. 30 with fitting coefficients

The same fitting procedure was repeated for the power coefficient equation, represented by Eq. 38, in which the

following constants were obtained through numerical regression to experimental data: b0 =0.000618632, b1 = 0.0000263855,

SPE 165028

b2 = 0.319631, b3=0.00445414 and b4 = - 28.1499. Fig. 8 presents the results obtained compared to the experimental data.

Similar to the previous case, the majority of the points have an error lower than 10%, showing satisfactory agreement.

Fig. 9 shows the efficiency map determined from Eqs. 11, 30 and 38 extended to the full range. The observed

behavior is quite consistent with the expectations for a centrifugal pump.

Because of the high viscosity of the liquid, which resulted low flow rates, the first liquid-gas experiments resulted in

laminar flow which favored the coalescence of the bubbles right before the test pump intake. This is due to the parabolic shape

of the velocity profile. The closer to the pipe axis the higher the flow velocity, resulting in a lateral pressure force for a bubble

positioned in the flow field, as represented in Fig. 10. This velocity difference creates a force towards the center of the pipe,

causing all injected bubbles to move towards the center of the tube and merge, forming a larger bubble.

The diameter of the resulting bubble was well above the critical diameter and according to Estevam (2002) this

causes premature surging and gas lock of the pump. Fig. 11 shows a picture of this phenomenon, where it is possible to

visualize the bubbles heading to the center of pipe, the occurrence of coalescence and the larger bubble formed.

Therefore, because of the limitation of the facility to increase the liquid flow rate to reach turbulent flow, it was

necessary to reduce the viscosity of the liquid by adding water to the glycerin, as mentioned earlier.

10

SPE 165028

V1

V1>V2

V2

Resulting

force to the

center

Coalescence

center of the tube

The first tests with two-phase viscous flow concerned the impact caused by different viscosities and free gas fractions

in the pump head. For these experiments, the rotational speed and liquid flow rate were kept constant and the viscosity was

reduced by increasing the fluid temperature through the electric heater.

Fig. 12 shows the results for dimensionless two-phase head relative to single-phase water head as a function of the

viscosity for different inlet no-slip gas fractions. It is evident that higher viscosities result in higher degradation for the same

gas fraction. For low viscosities, the turbulence increases the bubble breakup rate and consequently the bubbles become

smaller, resulting in better performance of pump. High viscosities results in coalescence and formation of a stationary bubble

at the impellers entrance. This is the reason why the pump tolerated only small inlet gas-fractions ( 1%) without surging.

SPE 165028

11

Fig. 12 Two-phase head ratio relative to single-phase water as a function of viscosity for different gas fractions

The following analysis had the objective to evaluate if the proposed single-phase flow dimensionless groups are also

valid under two-phase flow using mixture properties. For single phase flow and constant rotational speed, the variable X is

linearly dependent on the fluids kinematic viscosity i.e. = . However, for two-phase flow inside a centrifugal pump

the dependence between the kinematic viscosity and the void fraction is unknown. The reason to expect that the void fraction

effect can be incorporated in the parameter X lies in the fact that, under conditions the pump operates with a homogeneous

mixture of dispersed bubbles, the pump degradation caused by the presence of gas is similar to when operating with a high

viscous fluid, as it was presented in Fig. 12.

To justify this fact, consider first the case when the fluid at the pump intake consists of a swarm of small diameter

bubbles ( < ) dispersed throughout the liquid. Using the expression proposed Ishii-Zuber (1979) to represent the

viscosity of a liquid with non-coalescent micro bubbles (with ), the homogeneous two-phase X would be:

..................................................................................................................................................... (39)

...................................................................................................................................... (40)

where is the average void fraction inside the impellers. This expression of satisfies the expectation that an

increase in the void fraction increases the parameter X and degrades the performance of the pump. For a situation of small

bubbles and small void fractions, the phase segregation inside the pump can be neglected and the void fraction assumed to be

equal to the no-slip inlet void fraction (i.e. = ). However, for bubbles larger than the critical size, as in our experiments

with viscous fluids, bubble coalescence and phase segregation inside the pump occur immediately inside the impeller channel.

The intensity of phase segregation is related to the centripetal-gravity acceleration ratio. Thus it can be expected for

deformable bubbles.

The experiments were performed to obtain the specific capacity and specific head for the same specific speeds and

rotational speeds of the single phase flow experiments and different gas fractions. Fig. 13 shows the two-phase (red dots) data

overlapped with single phase (blue dots).

12

SPE 165028

To determine how the variable X should be modified to incorporate the free gas effect, Eq. 30 can be written as

presented in Eq. 41, fitted with the coefficients obtained from single-phase flow:

. .

.

............................................................................................................................ (41)

where the head coefficient CH and capacity coefficient CQ are obtained from Eqs. 6 and 7 considering two-phase flow

data, as presented in Eq. 42 and 43. The inlet no-slip void fraction was used for convenience, i.e.:

=

=

....................................................................................................................................... (42)

.......................................................................................................................................... (43)

, where =

SPE 165028

13

is shown in Fig. 15, where an attempt was made to incorporate the effect of the

centripetal force (Fc) relative to the inlet gravity field (Fg), which is believed to cause a gas fraction increase inside the pump.

Fig. 15 Two-phase parameter X as a function of the inlet no-slip gas fraction corrected by the centripetal force

Based on the results of Fig. 15 the following correlation is proposed for two-phase flow with deformable bubbles at

inlet, which coefficients must be obtained experimentally for each pump model:

= 1 +

where

+

........................................................................................................................... (44)

CONCLUSIONS

1. It was found that the dimensionless groups proposed by Solano (2009) are able to translate the combined effect of

rotational speed and viscosity, while demonstrating that the Stepanoff correlation is also valid beyond the best

efficiency point.

2. Based on the Solanos proposal, it is possible to obtain a similar operation map using dimensionless numbers already

known from literature.

3. Considering the Eulers equation and theoretical losses in the pump, along with experimental data, it was possible to

obtain quadratic equations that can represent, with good agreement, the head, break horsepower and efficiency of the

pump as a function of the capacity coefficient and the Reynolds number.

4. The presence of laminar flow at the pump intake is extremely detrimental to its performance. This leads to a

coalescence of the bubbles in the center of the pipe, forming a large bubble that causes the phenomenon of gas

locking.

5. For a given gas fraction, higher liquid viscosities result in less turbulence, which results in less bubbles breakups.

Consequently larger bubbles are formed, severely impacting the performance of the pump.

6. It was observed the behavior of the proposed dimensionless groups under the presence of gas. A relationship between

the two-phase experimental data, the liquid data and the gas fraction was identified, allowing to estimate the head

degradation.

Nomenclature

An

b

CH

CP

CQ

d

Fc

Fg

g

Channel height, L, m

Head Coefficient

Power Coefficient

Capacity Coefficient

Impeller diameter, L, m

Centripetal force, ML/T2, kg.m/s2

Gravity field, ML/T2, kg.m/s2

Gravity acceleration, L/T2, m/s2

14

SPE 165028

H

k(Li/d)

Li

N

Ns

ns

p

q

q*

r1

r2

rm

Rn

X

Ws

Greek

P

a

References

Pump head, L, m

Function that includes all lengths, areas and area ratios

Geometrical characteristic, L, m

Rotational speed, rpm

Specific Speed

Specific Speed (SI units)

Pressure, M/LT2, Pa

Total flow rate, L3/T, m3/s

Shockless (design) flow rate, L3/T, m3/s

Rotor inlet radius, L, m

Rotor outlet radius, L, m

Mean radius of rotor, L, m

Normalized Reynolds

Inverse of Reynolds number

Break horsepower, ML2/T3, W

Pressure difference, M/LT2, Pa

void fraction

Pump efficiency

Inlet no-slip void fraction

Dynamic viscosity, M/LT, Pa.s

Liquid dynamic viscosity, M/LT, Pa.s

Kinematic viscosity, L2/T, cSt

Density, M/L3, kg/m3

Liquid density, M/L3, kg/m3

Specific
Head

Specific
Capacity

Angular velocity, rad/s

Barrios, Lissett J. Visualization and Modeling of Multiphase Performance inside an Electrical Submersible Pump. PhD

Thesis, University of Tulsa, Oklahoma, 2007.

Cirilo, R. Air-Water Flow Through Electrical Submersible Pumps. MS Dissertation, University of Tulsa, 1998.

Estevam, Valdir. Uma Anlise Fenomenolgica da Operao de Bomba Centrfuga com Escoamento Bifsico. PhD Thesis,

State University of Campinas UNICAMP, Campinas, 2002.

Gamboa, Jose. Prediction of the Transition in Two-Phase Performance of an Electrical Submersible Pump. PhD Thesis,

University of Tulsa, Oklahoma, 2008.

Hydraulic Institute. Hydraulic Institute Standards for Centrifugal, Rotary & Reciprocating Pumps. 14th Edition, 1983.

Hydraulic Institute. Effects of Liquid Viscosity on Rotodynamic (Centrifugal and Vertical) Pump Performance. Dec 2010.

Ishii, M. ; Zuber, N. Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows. AIChE Journal, vol. 25,

No. 5, pp. 843-855, 1979.

Lea, J. F.; Bearden, J.L. Effect of Gaseous Fluids on Submersible Pump Performance. SPE 9218, 1980.

Monte Verde, W. Estudo Experimental de Bombas de BCS Operando com Escoamento Bifsico Gs-Lquido. MS

Dissertation, State University of Campinas, Campinas, 2011.

Murakami, M.; Minemura, K. Effects of Entrained Air on the Performance of a Centrifugal Pump. Bulletin of the JSME,

Vol. 17, No. 110, August 1974.

Prado, M. G. Bombeio Centrfugo Submerso Avanado. Course Notes, Rio de Janeiro, 2007.

Rodrigues, Rui Francisco Pessoa. Experimental Investigation of Two-Phase Flow Performance of Electrical Submersible

Pump Stages. MS Dissertation, University of Tulsa, Oklahoma, 2001.

Solano, Edgar. Viscous Effects on the Performance of Electro Submersible Pumps (ESPs). MS Dissertation, University of

Tulsa, Oklahoma, 2009.

Stepanoff, A. J. Centrifugal end Axial Flow Pups Theory, Design and Application. 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons,

New York, 1957.

Trevisan, Francisco E. Modeling and Visualization of Air and Viscous Liquid in Electrical Submersible Pump. PhD

Thesis, University of Tulsa, Oklahoma, 2009.

White, Frank M. Fluid Mechanics, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill.

- 1 Fluids and their Properties.pdfUploaded byUmer Abbas
- HydrodynamicsUploaded byIustin Cristian
- A Comprehensive Mechanistic Model for Upward Two-Phase Flow in WellboresUploaded byfanziskus
- B.E. (Civil Engineering) SyllabusUploaded bydarthbne
- Reynolds NumberUploaded bylallu24
- CVE334 CoursewareUploaded bySamuelShinaAyodele
- Fluid Flow Rev03webUploaded byaizatmarican
- pbr-5025Uploaded byPamela Hancock
- 191264286-SpiraxSarco-The-Steam-and-Condensate-Loop-Block-1-14.pdfUploaded bysudhakarrajam2002
- Turbulent Heat Transfer to Non-Newtonian Fluids in Circular TubesUploaded byjdgh1986
- Ch 4 Drilling HydraulicsUploaded bySaravin Selhvadurai
- Lecure 1 Fluid MechanicsUploaded byAhmed Naeem
- 2014_Wen-Guang Li _Mechanism for Onset of Sudden-Rising Head Effect in Centrifugal Pump When Handling Viscous OilsUploaded byGuilherme Antunes
- a must readUploaded bySarkodie Kwame
- 64241Uploaded byamdeva
- Fluids and Thermo Revision NotesUploaded byScott Kinley
- Section 7Uploaded byHAFIZ IMRAN AKHTER
- Two Phase Flow in Well-flowlinesUploaded byMario Enrique Vadillo Sáenz
- Section 16Uploaded byHAFIZ IMRAN AKHTER
- Pump preformanceUploaded byvkumaran
- linear-stability-analysis-and-numerical-simulation-of-miscible-two-layer-channel-flow.pdfUploaded bysafaat
- 372_NO06_ReynoldsEqUploaded byfab1991
- Fluid FlowUploaded bygovimano
- FluidUploaded bykalaivananmek
- Hyd Dynamic Lub PrinciplesUploaded bysivajirao70
- Experimental - Bubble columnUploaded bylrodriguez_892566
- Internal Viscosity 2018Uploaded byDon MacInnes
- Turbulence in Fluids_2Uploaded byErvin Hadzic
- PortfolioUploaded byJohn Lane
- J.M. Redondo et al- Laboratory and Numerical Models of Richtmeyer-Meshkov and Rayleigh-Taylor InstabilitiesUploaded byMallamax

- toe questUploaded byrameshbabu_1979
- 51992_CV Pak Wono.docxUploaded byKharisma
- PETSOC-86!04!02 Skin Factor and Flow Efficiency in Wells ProUploaded byMiguel Angel Gonzales
- Oceanic and Continental CrustUploaded byMernie Grace Dionesio
- Marine Chart Work (D.a.moore)Uploaded byPawan Kumar
- Quantum Relativity.pdfUploaded byAnonymous lKMmPk
- econometrics_I definitions , theorems and factsUploaded byshere0002923
- Solutions to Levi Applied Quantum Mechanics 2nd EdUploaded bySam Johnson
- SP7020M00D01-000--aUploaded bypetervoca
- Introduction to Average ValueUploaded byRebecka Kermanshahi Peterson
- 9702_w18_qp_11Uploaded byHaris Rashid
- Tesla Symp06 CorumUploaded byNO,NO,NO 2 status QUO
- 1607.08368.pdfUploaded byRoger Dante Ripas Mamani
- Helical Coil SpringUploaded bygovimano
- 0124759610 Experimental Physics- UltrasonicUploaded byCalin Truta
- LAND -- Barker Speaks.pdfUploaded byMiguel Prado
- FDA Componentes Empaques AlimentosUploaded byPatricia Rodriguez
- Cat 4Uploaded byPraveen Kumar
- DefinitionUploaded byNingTyas Saga
- Use of UhpfrcUploaded bySathya
- Fouriour seriesUploaded byHerberT
- Enhancement of heat transfer on Engine Cylinder BlockUploaded byIRJET Journal
- ExponentsUploaded bypeter sum
- Infilled Frames.Uploaded bySujay Raghavendra N
- Simulation of Roll Passes for Section RollingUploaded byMostafaGaber
- Rapid Method for the in-field Analysis of AmphetaminesUploaded bydmar5
- Sika Fume HRUploaded bythe pilot
- 1Uploaded bythavamani
- CFD Lab ManualUploaded bycoool_imran
- Backward Stochastic Differential Equation, Nonlinear Expectation and Their ApplicationsUploaded bymeko1986