This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
COM POSTINGS AFFIRMED POLITICIANS RESPONDED BY ATTEMPTING TO SUBVERT THE CONSTITUTION IN VIOLATIONS
The opinions in this article are based upon Rob Brayshaw and his supporter’s without footnotes to this situation as they have all displayed or given as their own opinions.
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH TRUMPS GOVERNMENT OBSESSION WITH SECRECY Federal Judge upholds Citizen’s Constitutional Right to post public information pertaining to Florida Police on the Web
Tallahassee, June. 2010 (AN EDITORIAL)-- A website posting on Ratemycop.com contained vast quantities of “allegedly” personal public information regarding police officer Annette Pickett Garrett in Florida State. This posting can remain on the Internet after Federal Judge Richard Smoak upheld the legality of the posting on the Ratemycop.com website under the 1st Amendment. For the Third Time in Court Rulings, Rob Brayshaw, a Tallahassee Citizen, has emerged victorious from a groundless though very well-funded attack mounted by the City of Tallahassee and State Of Florida against him. In fact, this Run-Away Tallahassee Government Wasted Over $100,000.00 in the Tax Payers Money for two false criminal charges and defense of their use of an Unconstitutional 1972 Statute of 843.17. It was Unconstitutional, Outdated and A Relic! Two False Criminal Charges of “publishing an address” were dismissed in a one year period during May 2008-April 2009 among three judges, three prosecutors and four public defenders funded by the tax payers that pay these public servants to work for us. This was in the Leon County Kangaroo Court that obviously lacked knowledge of the US Constitution and Bill Of Rights. These Police Officers, Prosecutors and Judges along with their Lap-dogs in Legislature are always hugging, kissing and holding hands while jumping off a cliff together like lemons’ with government obsession of secrecy pertaining to public information. May we remind you that WE LIVE IN THE SUNSHINE STATE WITH OPEN GOVERNMENT FOR THE YEAR 2010 THAT CERTAINLY ISN’T 1972.
Infuriated by their inability to defeat Rob Brayshaw in court on false criminal charges, the cops and their cohorts in Tallahassee’s political establishment actually had the nerve to refile the false charges again after dismissal. They originally turned to the legislature for revenge against the public in 1972 with the writing of the Unconstitutional Law 843.17 even at that time. This was before the Internet, Florida Sunshine Laws, and Jury Member Lists of Names and Addresses. Many Supreme Court Cases have obviously existed in 40 years for Free Speech and Free Press Cases that would make the law completely relic and obsolete even when it had unconstitutional First Amendment Flaws as written now in the Internet Era of 2010 since 1972. Joined by police unions from all across Florida State, the police have mounted a massive lobbying campaign to help ram through a future ugly piece of customtailored special-interest legislation during the next Legislation in Session in Tallahassee.
In response to Brayshaw’s High courtroom victory, (and the lobbying of the cops), Florida State is sponsoring future legislation which would subvert the Constitution, set aside the decision of the court, and establish Secret Police in Florida State.
The Tallahassee Police again want to sponsor legislation which would effectively transform Florida’s law enforcement officers into shadowy Secret Police. The future bill provision for a new Florida Statute of 843.17 would grant the police unconstitutional benefits and special privileges; confer wholesale immunity upon them; create exceptionally broad and should have been previously non-existent as rights exclusively for their benefit; and further expand their elite status relative to the common citizenry. None of these newly-proposed rights would be afforded to any other citizens. To the contrary-- each of these so-called rights would decimate vital, historicallyconsecrated, Constitutionally-protected rights of common citizens. Passage of this unconstitutional bill of Florida Statute 843.17 again would make a complete mockery of the oath taken by Florida Police and Florida State Legislators to uphold and defend the US Constitution. Already, a grass-roots movement has sprung up by Brayshaw and his sponsors to ensure the defeat of this future plan in the making for the next elections in the Florida Legislation to defeat their plans. The Florida Police Benevolent Association stated that they would try and craft another law for their members since the ruling will stand. Unsuccessfully attempting to defend her assault on the Constitution, Annette Garrett along with the Tallahassee Police and State Attorney’s Office of Willie
Meggs offered this wholly irrelevant and baseless statement, "You don't have a First Amendment right to harass and intimidate." Don’t you work for citizens? What these individuals pretend not to realize is that Mr. Brayshaw has revealed NO demonstrable intent to harass or intimidate, notwithstanding the subjective impression of the cops. Furthermore, (and this is the crux of the matter), it is indefensible and unconstitutional to create any criminal or civil offense type of law which is grounded solely on the unpredictable, irrational, emotional response of vindictive officers to the completely benign and perfectly legal act of posting on the Internet publicly-available information regarding government employees. Constitutionally prohibited from legally defining Brayshaw’s activity as a criminal offense, they are still attempting an end-run around the 1st Amendment by inventing a brand-new criminal offense with some other law on the future books. The unconstitutional bill would always allow any hypersensitive cop who claimed to “feel intimidated” by the innocuous content of Brayshaw’s posting or any other citizen. They would file unconstitutional criminal charges against Brayshaw or any other Floridian in complete violation of any Citizen’s Free Speech and Free Press by Trampling The First Amendment Of Our Constitution. Tallahassee Police along with the State Attorney’s Office maneuver not only defeats the express intent of the 1st Amendment, it neatly strips the suspect of crucial Constitutional protections while at the same time permitting a conviction to take place upon a much lower standard of proof. Even any Malicious Intent is not based upon any “True Threat” based upon Constitutional preponderance not protected by the First Amendment as already ruled in a Federal Court of Law. For example, the 5th Amendment is applicable only to criminal, not civil defendants. Compounding this disadvantage, the defendant in a civil trial is held liable if it merely seems more likely than not that the alleged offense was committed. On the other hand, guilt on the part of a criminal defendant must be established beyond a reasonable doubt (a very difficult standard to meet). Rather than the 98-100% certainty of guilt required for a criminal conviction, a civil judgment only requires 51% certainty. For the False Charges of Rob Brayshaw, there was not even a 50% Probable Cause with the False Arrest Warrant written by Michael Edward Dilmore. Anyone could have made the posting from a wireless internet service at a home that was protected by the First Amendment and “did not constitutionally allow” any investigation by corrupt and dirty cops involved in the investigation which was baseless, weak and deminimus. Annette Garrett and Mike Dilmore (Along with all Tallahassee Officals Involved) despicable subversion of the Constitution left any potential defendants in an extremely weak position-- easy prey for the omnipotent State’s designated pinchhitters which was based on corruption of the actual facts and unconstitutional.
As Americans, we should not be required to care if ANYONE, let alone any cop, feels intimidated or harmed when we engage in Constitutionallyprotected activity. If the activity itself is legal, we cannot and should not be held responsible for anyone else’s subjective high emotional response to our actions as a citizen. Police Officers certainly need a tougher skin than the public citizens considering their line of work for handling what they do. Without question, it is perfectly legal to post publicly-available information on the Internet especially when Officers like Mike Dilmore and Annette Garrett place such information in public domain for the world to see with their own websites. Whether or not someone is alarmed or intimidated by that information, in the absence of any threats, is not the responsibility or concern of the individual posting the information. To hold otherwise is to defy rationality and cede control of society to the emotional vagaries of specially selected individuals. For all we know, Tallahassee Police Officers Annette Garrett or Mike Dilmore are craven, sniveling cowards who would break down in tears if they suspected that you wrote their name and phone number in a bathroom stall. If Tallahassee’s bill passes, Garrett and Dilmore can arrest you again just for intimidating them and these officers have less protection (not more than citizens) to the First Amendment! They work for us and paid by tax payers dollars as public servants. Another problem with this proposed law is the matter of intent for subjective thought-policing. Absent a clear statement of intent from the suspect himself, it is COMPLETELY IMPOSSIBLE to ascertain the motive of anyone who is doing what Brayshaw did by merely posting any name, address or phone number as American’s do everyday without any false arrest. Note that Brayshaw has never issued any threats, nor encouraged his readers to engage in any illegal activities. To the contrary-- he has consistently maintained that the website posting represented a joke or an effort to humanize the cops and foster accountability among their ranks by illustrating some of the innumerable characteristics they share in common with the rest of society. Under these circumstances, how can anyone who is not privy to Rob Brayshaw’s innermost unexpressed thoughts determine whether the information was being posted in order to encourage police accountability, or in order to intimidate the cops? However, intimidation is certainly not a crime as declared as a matter of Federal Law in Federal Court . What’s more, it’s exceedingly obvious that ANY serious attempt to foster accountability with the ranks of police officers will INEVITABLY be interpreted by the cops as intimidation or police harassment as a matter of citizen rights. That being the case, are we required to refrain from all activities which might possibly annoy any police officer, no matter how hypersensitive, hypochondriacal, or paranoid? If Tallahassee’s future bill becomes law, no one will dare take the risk. Law-abiding citizens will be dissuaded from exercising their 1st Amendment freedoms out of fear that vindictive police officers, slavering
with eagerness to wield their newly-granted private censorial powers, will slap them with false state-sanctioned criminal charges or lawsuits for any complaint. Passage of Tallahassee’s bill will bring us under the nightmarish jurisdiction of Orwell’s 1984, in which common citizens live in constant, mortal fear of being accused of virtually-undefined thought-crimes. As in the novel, it will be nearly impossible to mount any possible defense, because no means are available to disprove the charges. What evidence can be used to disprove the allegation that an impermissible thought was contemplated; or an undesired emotion was engendered in another; or an otherwise acceptable action was undertaken for an unacceptable reason? The presumptions are all in favor of the accuser, while the defendant faces the futile task of proving a negative. Tallahassee has overthrown the quintessential American doctrine, and replaced it with a perversion: Guilty until proven innocent especially based on the low and corrupt police standards of Officers like Annette Pickett Garrett (Badge #640) and Michael Edward Dilmore (Badge #694) by attempting to use an Unconstitutional Florida Statute that didn’t even apply to the “Constitutionally Protected Actions” of Rob Brayshaw. Neither the City of Tallahassee nor their designated stand-ins should be permitted to punish us for the entirely speculative possibility that we may be harboring impermissible thoughts or acting upon unacceptable motives that proves nothing. The citizens of Florida should respond to this outrage with a phrase that these cops themselves have long used as an unofficial motto: This is America, you dirt bags! If you don’t like it, move to China (as they act towards us with no privacy)! Yet another problem with this bill is that it was written specifically to target Brayshaw or any of the minorities protesting among local government’s wrongful actions, while deliberately ignoring numerous other entities that engage in activity that is indistinguishable from Brayshaw. As mentioned in the first article in this series, Brayshaw obtained all the information on the website posting from a wide variety of public sources, including internet court files, telephone books, and government records. Additional information could have been obtained from commercial information-brokerage firms for a small fee paid available to anyone. However, under Tallahassee’s proposed law, NONE of the Public sources utilized by Brayshaw in compiling his data for a posting would be exposed to any liability or false criminal charges whatsoever. Brayshaw alone would be hung out to dry, despite the fact that his activities are indistinguishable from the activities of the officially acceptable commercial parties. This outcome conclusively reveals the inherently despicable, arbitrary, and unfair nature of Tallahassee’s special-interest legislation and self-serving police officers that don’t protect and serve. Fortunately, Brayshaw, vows that he will not acquiesce to the imposition of this indefensible law. Says Brayshaw, I will challenge that future bill in federal
court before the ink by the legislation dries if there’s any question of unconstitutionality. This is with or without the support of the ACLU.
Tallahassee Police Officer Annette Garrett stops at nothing in her frighteningly obsessive efforts to persecute Brayshaw. This all started based upon a petty and baseless trespass investigation while he was working as the property manager.
Officer Annette Garrett is the one Officer who’s claims failed suits against Brayshaw for any criminal charges that were unconstitutional and baseless. She originally and unsuccessfully sought a false trespassing charge and then also two false criminal charges as misdemeanors from Brayshaw in recompense for “alleged damages” caused to her by the website posting of having her name, address and phone number republished as she displayed to the world already. Presumably enraged by Brayshaw’s victory, Garrett was resorted to filing charges again in favor of Tallahassee’s Unconstitutional Statute for the second time and it was even outside of the Speedy Trial Period that had ended four months prior. Annette Garrett basically made this emotional plea to the State Attorney’s Office: "But when I take the uniform off and go home, I should be afforded the same privileges and freedoms as everyone else, and have the right to feel safe." Unfortunately, Annette Garrett’s Basic statement is typical of the specious drivel spouted by many police officers. They consistently attempt to portray themselves as selfless, put-upon martyrs in the service of some noble cause. It’s a transparent ploy that fools none but the most gullible, willfully uninformed members of society. Garrett’s false testimony in police reports regarding Rob Brayshaw serves as an object lesson regarding the veracity of police testimony in general: nine times out of ten, cops will swear to tell the truth, then lie with well-practiced professionalism when they take the witness stand like criminals. In reality, of course, this Unconstitutional Law would not grant police the same privileges and freedoms as everyone else. As American citizens, the police ALREADY possess the same privileges and freedoms as everyone else. In fact, the cops already possess many ADDITIONAL privileges and freedoms which are unavailable to anyone else, and which they do not deserve at all because some cops are just plain dirty, dishonest and crooked to watch often on the news and in the media. The Statute Garrett is lobbying for by using it as a criminal offense would grant the cops yet another set of unique, undeserved special rights. If Annette Garrett or Mike Dilmore were being truthful when they claim to want the same rights and privileges as the rest of us, then of necessity they must either
be in favor of granting us additional rights, or of giving up some of their own heightened rights as police officers. But as everyone knows, they are not in favor of either option- their statements are merely a carefully calculated, dishonest sound-bite. Clearly, Annette Garrett and Mike Dilmore’s TRUE objective is the creation of a whole new package of special privileges formulated exclusively for the cops in violations of the United States Constitution to trample on citizens. Beyond the obvious falsity of Annette Garrett’s primary claim, what are we to make of Garrett’s pathetic plea that she should have the right to feel safe? Contrary to Garrett’s allegation, there is no such thing as the right to feel safe. For example, none of us feel safe when flying on a commercial passenger plane. And for good reason-- planes frequently crash, killing all their occupants. As concerned citizens, what can we do? Our alleged right to feel safe is being violated! Surely the airlines are breaking the law? Let’s throw them all in jail-- or sue them, at least! In reality, the airlines are neither culpable nor liable, because they have not caused any actual harm. You have no right to punish them simply because you don’t feel safe. Only if they actually cause you harm you can you expect them to be punished with criminal charges and/or reasonably sued with a civil lawsuit and that would be with good reason. Similarly, your alleged right to feel safe, is violated every time you drive a car. Driving a car is many times more dangerous than flying, and incalculably more dangerous than being any police officer. Police are great at Propagandas for making up problems that don’t even exist like an address re-published from the phone books. But there’s no one you can legally sue, and no one is prosecuted, because no harm has been done. It’s dangerous just stepping outside of one’s own house everyday for being hit by a drunken citizen or even a law enforcement officer like Sheriff David Harvey as an accident. We Citizens in Tallahassee have unfortunately lost two Great Officers in the last ten years in a decade. Sergeant Dale Green was killed during a burglary of doing his job. Michael Saunders was unfortunately killed most recently by a drunk driver. These are two officers that weren’t chasing addresses “re-published from the phone books”. The publishing of any address of public record is obviously not the weapon deployed in the City. While the deaths of these officers are a major tragedy, two officers lost doesn’t seem very high for numbers in a ten year period for a police department that employs over 350 at a time for the public. It would seem that selling Avon Products would be equally as dangerous if not more dangerous for being out and about in the City. The Florida Statute of 843.17 for criminal charges were completely laughable. However, it’s also scary that these alleged “professionals” that work for the citizens to protect and serve us as thugs with badges.
Simply put, there is no law that grants any American the right to feel safe. Florida Statute 843.17 is a major false sense of security for anyone based on information all ready all over the place on the internet in a digital world for 2010. This isn’t 1972 now when the dumb and poorly written law was written over 40 years ago that didn’t contain any required threat in the writing of it by the Florida Legislature making it Unconstitutional. Just for the sake of argument, let’s pretend for a moment that Garrett’s invocation of a right to feel safe wasn’t completely specious. If such a right truly existed, what could we do to secure its fulfillment for Officer Annette Garrett or Officer Mike Dilmore involved in the case for false criminal charges as declared in Federal Court? It actually took three officers to come to court for an address. Perhaps an armed police officer should be assigned to provide them with aroundthe-clock protection for each of them? Having their address in the phone book is a major threat. It’s been there for years and in the public domain as dangerous. (Of course they deserve such “Special Police” protection as coddled officers, even though it’s unavailable to any other citizens, because they are so Special and Needy). (They should all be wearing Pink Snuggies as their new uniforms.) How would you feel about that, Mr. Dilmore or Ms. Annette Garrett? Would an armed police officer help to make you feel safe at home for the re-publishing of your address by that of a citizen or even any commercial business? Since that doesn’t exist now, it must be the civil duty of Rob Brayshaw and all other Tallahassee Citizens to do a 24-hour patrol on your home daily. This is to protect you and your family just because you have your address published in the phone book and on the web that existed solely by your own actions of disclosure to the public. This must put you in major danger with the phone books and other directories while being a cop as a matter of public records in the public domain. Oops, wait a minute.. You ARE an armed police officer! Highly experienced Investigators even that should be exposed to run to and protect us as the citizens! And yet even with your guns and equipment, and your allegedly extensive training, and your supposedly well-honed instincts, and your virtually instantaneous access to zealous and overwhelming backup and resources, and your ability to dial 911 in case of emergencies, you still feel unsafe by the publishing of your home addresses? Don’t people need it to find your address? Then please tell us, Ms. Garrett and Mr. Dilmore, how the rest of us should feel, who frequently have no access to any of your defensive assets. What about OUR right to feel safe? Even on juries, you publish and Expose Every Citizen Address.
You park our tax payer’s vehicles in your driveways personally marking yourselves as police officers to the public with personal advertising at home. How are we to feel when we see hypocritical and egotistical self-serving cops such as yourself lobbying for increased restrictions on handgun ownership? How are we to feel when we must walk through a bad part of town bereft of the ability to effectively defend ourselves against deadly force? How are we to feel when we dial 911 for assistance and the cops do not show up until at least 45 minutes after the violent crime has taken place? How are we to feel when we regularly see cops convicted of all manner of felonies and violent crimes? How are we to feel when we realize that such criminal cops are armed to the teeth, and that we would be completely at their mercy if you and the police unions have your way? How are we to feel when a cop like you, secure in the knowledge that he is virtually immune from any accountability, unjustifiably treats us like crap? How are we to feel when we realize that we have no reasonable and effective recourse for such official mistreatment, not even-- should you and your ilk have your way-- the ability to exercise our Constitutional rights under the 1st Amendment? Many of us citizens don’t have family members nor ourselves are any “Black Belts” in the martial arts like many police officers and their family members. How are we to feel when we realize that YOU, Ms. Garrett and Mr. Mike Dilmore, are one of the evil of Nazi types responsible for this unacceptable state of affairs for attacking the tax payers that pay you that you work for and answer to? You have less legal protections of major criticisms as a public servant as part of your job than any other citizen as a matter of Federal Law and court decisions. Also, When government and law enforcement compiles databases full of our personal information don’t they always tell us citizens that only dishonest people have anything to fear? Practice what you preach! The charges were laughable and it’s even very scary that you call yourselves “professional” police officers that serve and protect the public. Tallahassee police aren’t living up to high standards based upon the death of a drug informant under their own watch and putting any citizen in jail for the mere re-publishing of an address. Rob Brayshaw is certainly entitled to his strongly-held opinions regarding the lack of care of Tallahassee Police for their duty as sworn to uphold. Things could be done much better. I’ll tell you how we feel, Dilmore and Garrett. We feel worried, scared, and exceedingly angry. So leave us alone. If you are too scared to be a cop, find yourself another job because the public should have open access to you. Do not persist in these attempts to subvert the Constitution of the United States and trample the Bill Of Rights to our Citizens. Do Cops Deserve Special Rights in Violation of the First and Fourteenth Amendments? IN A PIG’S EYE AS IN UNDER NO CONDITION, NOT AT ALL!
Garrett, Dilmore and their ilk must realize that Free Speech is the most legal and least harmful means of expressing displeasure and dissents. If these despots succeed in prohibiting Free Speech and Free Press, then those who oppose their policies and actions may resort to other, less desirable means of expressing their discontent which could cause serious problems for them among the “Real Criminals”. Luckily for you, Rob Brayshaw isn’t a criminal for approaching the situation with complaints and lawsuits for legal avenues as a personal option and civil right. The people that you should worry about are the “Real Criminals” that you could have possibly pushed too far in your line of work by Trampling their Constitutional Rights without any justification like your Unconstitutional Law of Florida Statute 843.17. Rob and Stephanie Brayshaw definitely got pushed by the City Of Tallahassee and The State because of the “Connected Network” that tramples the “Supreme Law”. When every avenue of dissent is effectively criminalized, the very outraged members of society for whom abject submission to tyranny is not an option will feel little incentive to refrain from violence. Just being mad and irate about Illegal, Wrongful and Poorly Handled Tallahassee Police Officer Actions like the Brayshaw’s Family is certainly not a crime at all by the citizens. Public Feedback is exactly what improves a police officer’s poor and sorry job performances with complaints and lawsuits as the only LEGAL RECOURSE. People have every right to file complaints and lawsuits against another that feel legally wronged from and are compelled to do so. Such patriots are not magically transformed by arbitrary, unconstitutional legislative fiat into spineless marionettes content to swallow their anger and follow the wrongful dictates of the State. Forget that! Far from it-repression of Free Speech or Free Press will only lead to greater, if temporarily better hidden, opposition to these authoritarian, Anti-American fascists. Dissidents, realizing that they will be exposed to punishment no matter how slight and inoffensive their rebellion, will perhaps feel justified in giving violent vent to their rage, while damning the possible consequences with the police having the lack of a Real Internal Affairs for Human Resources. They really are just a joke as a cover-up to the Tallahassee cops that don’t do anything unless forced by the public and the media like in the Rachel Hoffman Case. This is being written as a protection to all of us as American Citizens because venting is always important to everyone and very harmless. Anyone can be pushed and pushed too far by City Unlawful, City Injustice. We guess the people who print the phone books should all go to jail for publishing public information of an address. Oh yes and also the people at the newspapers who publish the names and addresses of people who are arrested. And of course they are also guilty of publishing the names and addresses of people who are born and die, no permission is granted there either. Oh and then there are the lists of people who graduate from school that are printed in the papers. Did the paper get permission from each of them for every case as required previously by Florida Statute 843.17 for a name, address or phone number?
While some of these things may not get published in the papers for Tallahassee, it does happen across the States in America making the cases ridiculous for Rob Brayshaw for biased and selective prosecution. We can only imagine the loss to the Hoffman Family without any justice to them. It doesn’t matter at all that their daughter was a drug dealer when she was murdered. She was a Tallahassee Citizen and supposedly sent out by TPD Officers with $13,000 in cash to buy drugs and a gun from the bigger fishes in the pond in the drug world. This is while under Police Protection and care with their personal responsibility to protect her. The operation was poorly botched and a bad operation while other officers with TPD were chasing an address publishing from the phone books as legally re-published from public record. Tallahassee Police Officers Annette Garrett and Mike Dilmore had no legal or constitutional right to investigate “constitutionally protected actions” from an address publishing on the internet resulting in false arrest from six weeks prior. In fact, they had no reason as police to step foot on the Brayshaw property considering safety is of no concern when the publishing was no longer listed and safety was not any issue. You can’t legally prosecute any Free Speech or Free Press unless it’s a clear threat not based upon merely re-publishing public information that the public may need for legal purposes like serving legal process or protest. Certainly Public Information republished is not any matter of National Security as it wasn’t Classified and it was certainly legally obtained by the government and private sources themselves like the Leon County Website and The Phone Directories.
Local media refuses to grant proportional coverage to Brayshaw’s victory for the dismissal of criminal charges! Some Media in the cop’s pocket?
When the City of Tallahassee announced it had filed false criminal charges against Brayshaw for the second time, the story received extensive coverage in media outlets in the local papers and news stations. To judge from the Tallahassee Police media reporting, Brayshaw’s website posting was a font of pure evil for the mere “re-publishing of an address” that would quickly lead to the complete destruction of Southern Civilization if the public knew that police officers had their names, addresses and phone numbers in the public domain of the phone books as had been for years even on the Leon County Court’s own website. True to their reputation as pathetic lap-dogs, NONE of the local media outlets would re-publish the address listed on the website, even after the legality of the posting was upheld in Federal Court with Honorable Judge Richard
Smoak. Rather than allowing their readers to examine the controversy of the postings on their own by providing the mere publishing of a name, address and phone number from the phone books, the editors manipulated the entire debate by presenting thinly-veiled one-sided diatribes against Rob Brayshaw. Any Free Speech Advocate, Professional Attorney or Legal Scholar knew the case was Silly in violation of the Constitution for First Amendment, Due Process and Equal Right Protections to all citizens simply all over-looked by the Good Ol’ Boy Network of Biased and Political Connections of Tallahassee Corruption. People write “unauthorized biographies” of people all the time and they don’t have to like them for their actions like Brayshaw’s major criticism of Garrett and Dilmore. Celebrities are in the public eye with their family members and they all have names, addresses and their phone numbers published if legally obtained and shared from public information on Star Maps. The media bias was even more obvious when Tallahassee’s False Criminal Charges were defeated twice. The meager coverage devoted to Brayshaw’s victory for dismissals of two false criminal charges failed to even vaguely approximate the exhaustive coverage accorded to the initial announcement of the false suits for criminal charges. Only a single local paper of the Tallahassee Democrat covered the news of Brayshaw’s defeat of Tallahassee, and they buried the one-paragraph story near the bottom of a multi-item Local Digest column.
Stay tuned for further developments.
If Tallahassee and their coalition of some corrupt cops and politicians succeed in subverting the Constitution again, thereby forcing the legal re-publishing of cops addresses off the internet by our Citizens, Rob Brayshaw will offer information to overseas hosts where the content of All Tallahassee Police Officers (Names, Addresses and Phone Numbers) will be duplicated in Dissent for Equal Rights of the 1st and 14th Amendments for Political Protest. They should have all their information published because they work for us and do many crimes as well. Any freedom-loving individuals located overseas who are willing to mirror these names, addresses and phone numbers of Tallahassee Police Officers should contact Rob Brayshaw. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. These Police Officers are our Public Servants and paid by our Tax Payers Dollars. They need to be held to higher standards than that of the public citizens by having their names, addresses and phone numbers re-published for legal reasons as it was republished legally by Rob Brayshaw. Florida has “Florida Sunshine Laws” regarding government activities for how citizen’s tax payer’s money is being spent and these public officials answer to the citizens. Spending over $100,000 on a case for an address republished from the phone books is completely unacceptable to any citizen standard that isn’t biased.
The issue of police accountability is certainly political and of legitimate public interest. Sheehan, 272 F. Supp. 2d at 1139 n.2, 1145. The publication of truthful personal information about police officers is linked to the issue of police accountability through aiding in achieving service of process, researching criminal history of officers, organizing lawful pickets, and other peaceful and lawful forms of civic involvement that publicize the issue. These Corrupt Nazi Actions might win the battle, but they will lose the war. They can have their names, addresses and phone numbers published like the rest of us with no unconstitutional and illegal protections in Florida. The internet can certainly over-ride any illegal objections with publishings in foreign countries ON GOOGLE. What started out as a joke publishing for police monitoring the Ratemycop.com website should have been over-looked by the Florida authorities after removing the “protected posting” that didn’t even have legal authority for removal from the web in itself. This is because they have No Authority to Trample Constitutional Rights that became Serious Issues in America as a Matter of Federal Law. This is in which Brayshaw won the ultimate federal decision that his actions were “constitutionally protected” by the First Amendment and no arrest was legally warranted by TPD. If publishing any name, address or phone number was a crime, All Americans would be criminals. It was really just Vindictive and Petty by Dirty Cops to Target and Arrest Rob Brayshaw with a Selective Prosecution that was Unenforceable under any legal terms because they can’t handle the Truth. The Truth is that they aren’t Protecting and Serving and Doing Their Jobs as Paid to Do While the Citizens Fend For Themselves Like Rachel Hoffman. There’s absolutely nothing personal against someone’s family members like Mike Dilmore or Annette Garrett or her “Scrappy” the Dog, it’s merely the fact that some cops aren’t doing their jobs as a matter of citizen opinion that is certainly entitled to them as one’s own opinion. (Many People Agree with these opinions that aren’t cops or individuals with political ties with the bias of the Blue Wall and Code Of Silence.) Making false claims against any citizen of safety issues and harassments as a police officer for expressing one’s opinions is certainly ridiculous when it costs the public citizens well over $100,000 based upon FALSE CHARGES THAT HAD ABSOLUTELY NO LEGALITY. THERE’S A SERIOUS PROBLEM WHEN ANY AMERICAN HAS TO FILE A FEDERAL LAWSUIT AGAINST THE CITY AND STATE JUST TO EXPRESS THE LEGALITY OF ONE’S PERSONAL OPINIONS. The First Amendment Protects Anonymity of a Speaker, Major Criticisms of Public Officials and the “Re-publishing” of their Public Information that isn’t Classified or any Matter of National Security in the Public Domain Already.
It’s only nature just like the Founding Fathers of this Country for dissent of using Anonymity as speakers or publishers with aliases for major criticisms of their government as the majority and them being a minority of disfavorable opinions protected by the First Amendment. It makes perfect sense to deny knowledge of any postings when one feels that they are being harassed and threatened to their family by “out of control cops” that have no legal authority to the frivolous and petty no-nothing investigation in the first place. People publish names, addresses and phone numbers everyday and they don’t have their personal constitutional and civil rights trampled by receiving a home invasion in the morning that has no relevance from an event six weeks ago from before then based upon public opinions and public information. These things get shared on the internet everyday by everyone in which police logic is all citizens are criminals but they don’t all get prosecuted. Take us all out of our homes and no one will be paying you! The Brayshaw’s over-paid on their taxes before this non-sense because of a tax fraud employer as determined by the IRS. The Two-Month Investigation to a Property Manager doing their job was very petty, ridiculous and biased just like Officer Annette Garrett involved in this case as well. Causing a possible five-minute disruption to an apartment for safety and property concerns at the same time (unlike this investigation or charges for six weeks later after a publishing) has no comparison at all. They were not sleeping at the time and they were harassing the tow truck driver that called the manager out of bed and to the property in the first place. They didn’t admit the facts of the case because the police were called out because of them. Rob was just doing his job and looking out for any concerns to the property and the residents as notified that an unknown male ran into the apartment. Under Florida Law 83.53, A Property Manager can have their personal concerns of the safety of residents and property when called at home under the actions. Not the Same as Six Weeks Prior with no safety concern based upon an address “re-published from the phone books” for one’s personal opinions to a poorly handled police case. A Twomonth false investigation with no criminal charges warrants an Apology instead of your Guilty and Take it as a Gift! Only a Judge Or Jury Member could possibly have any authority for that type of assertion with a trial. It’s not based upon a police officer’s poorly investigated and poorly written reports that didn’t include all witnesses based upon false police reports. Citizens have every right to disclose where police live at their home addresses if they have concerns of certain police officers that work for the public with their transparency and accountability of their wrongful actions. There must be a reason why Dick and Andrea Duffy feel the same way as well with a lawsuit in the court system against Officer Annette Garrett with Circuit Judge James Shelfer on the case. It’s because she over-steps her power and authority with abuse of the badge while having no legal authority to do so as shown in Federal Court for an Unconstitutional Law. This Unconstitutional law as written didn’t even apply to the constitutionally protected actions as stated by Federal Judge Richard Smoak. The mere publishing of any name, address or phone number cannot be deemed
“malicious enough” without any TRUE THREAT to warrant any criminal charges to be legally upheld. The “Imaginary Garrett Case” was never there for any legal justification and it certainly was never there for the second time charged outside of the speedy trial period in violation of Constitutional Rights to an American Citizen. We don’t live in Nazi, Germany and Judge Smoak stated this loud and clear in his personal opinion of Federal Ruling. This case was a landmark in America specifically for the few dirty, arrogant, egotistical, hypocritical and self-serving cops in America that feel that they are above the law with this ridiculous “Us Vs. Them Mentality”. There was no trace of any computer to anyone specifically which is still speculation based upon a wireless internet. Even Annette Garrett replied in the internet postings without honesty in her police reports about her personal involvements on the web. Generally and as the Majority, Police Officers are loved but they can become the enemy to the citizens that pay them. This is especially when they start harassing citizens and trampling constitutional rights without any substantial justification besides “Good Ol’ Boy Network” which is strictly biased and constitutional violations that would never reasonably fly in any Federal Court. It was the Police that should have better handled tax payer’s funds. Attempting to move these types of cases forward absent any true threat is completely absurd and ridiculous. Rob Brayshaw is strongly opinionated but has never threatened anyone. There is a current Federal Court Case scheduled in August this Summer. Hal Turner worked as an FBI Agent previously as a highly-trained government employee with a great record to his country in this line of work. He was arrested for publishing federal judges personal information on the internet with maps, home addresses and other information with statements that they “Deserved to Die”. He claims that he is protected by the First Amendment and it was just his opinion. Anyway, this case is much more serious and questionable than the Rob Brayshaw case for Free Speech and Free Press because Rob Brayshaw has never threatened anyone. Brayshaw’s postings were so far apart between days and hours that they really couldn’t be combined to other postings for a mere address publishing. However, the absolute worst that could have possibly been interpreted by any police officer, prosecutor or judge would be Rob Brayshaw stating that Annette Garrett is a rude, abusive and unprofessional police officer that lives at this home address. It would seem that the public does have a right to know as she works as a public servant and paid by the tax payer’s dollars to work for us. Her job is to protect and serve the public. That is hardly prosecutable for any crime for the most extreme interpretation of the matter. This is especially to warrant two officers (Mike Dilmore and Sonya Bush) coming to someone’s home in the morning over one month after the publishing which is obviously of no threat at all but strictly police harassment of Citizens.
Several website postings of the JusticeFiles.Org, Whosarat.com and the Nuremberg Files seemed much more controversial in nature for free speech and free press than a mere address publishing. And these sites were all constitutionally protected among Federal Court Decisions and still on the web today. Rob Brayshaw does not intice violence to others or even threaten anyone based upon a mere address publishing or publishing so-called personal information. It wasn’t personal or classified when it was obtained based upon the officer sharing it with the public for legal reasons and serving of process. With that being said, Rob Brayshaw doesn’t have any resemblance to the Hal Turner Case. The relevance is that Hal Turner has had two mistrials already on criminal charges for publishing names, home addresses and personal information about Federal Judges. This is while he stated that “They deserve to die” on a website posting. Rob Brayshaw would never say this in his own opinions for anyone. He feels that he is owed an apology by the City Of Tallahassee and State Of Florida while wanting to Goad them to action as a legal right as an American Citizen. There is a difference in one’s opinions. However, one has to question this Hal Turner case as any American citizen on the fact that it could be a constitutionally-protected statement as he stated that “they deserve to die” that he claims to hold as his opinion. Publishing any Public Information is not illegal or any crime. In fact, it helps open government for discussion and robust debates with legal processes. Giving an opinion is not a crime as long as it’s not a clear and present danger of a threat. The fact is that Hal Turner is Innocent until proven Guilty. The Man worked for the FBI with a vast record and knowledge of the law that did much good for the country as explained on the internet. He has already been declared for having two mistrials on the charges. The majority of jury members have already favored his innocence based upon the First Amendment on two occasions with the third trial scheduled again with a delay for August. This is certainly a run-away American Government with the tax payers paying the bills based upon an alleged “Free Speech or Free Press” Crime. It’s completely ridiculous and absurd to prosecute any American Citizen like Rob Brayshaw for their free speech and free press based upon public information that is legally obtained and shared with public opinions about especially public servants. If public servants can’t take criticisms as they have the least protection from them as ordinary citizens, they need to find another line of work. This is especially when the information doesn’t include any possible perception of any reasonable threat from a reasonable point of view. This is besides statements of a rude, abusive and unprofessional police officer just abusing their power and authority as a privilege given to them. This is to work for the public while shielded by their political ties and their buddies as the Blue Wall or The Code Of Silence. It would be rare that another Officer would report the wrongful actions of another because when one
Officer looks bad, so does the Whole Department which cover-up is their solution just like in the Rachel Hoffman case. Even the bad officers as “spoiled apples” corrupt the good that keep their mouths shut about wrongful actions of their buddies because it can affect everyone in the Department with fear of retributions for speaking out about them. We feel that the Chief Of Police, FDLE and Internal Affairs are basically all working together as one opinion. Their opinion would always be the same unless someone of reasonable authority dislikes a certain Officer with enough people in power to do so for putting them in their place with disciplinary measures including dismissals. Many complaints are just swept under the carpet with no actions being taken at all as a matter of politics for who know’s who with their political connections. The Rob Brayshaw Story is a perfect example of things that the City of Tallahassee and State Of Florida with their Public Officials should not do. They basically all hold hands together with hugging and kissing while jumping off a cliff as lemons’’ into government secrecies without any questions to others of doing so. These are certainly not the leaders that our citizens need in government with their “Out of Control” Dictatorships and Trampling upon American Constitutional Rights. They really need to be more diverse instead of sharing the same brain. Politics and Good Ol’ Boy Government at it’s finest because the criminalization of any Mere Address Publishing is contrary to a Democratic and Free Society. Home Addresses of Public Officials are used every day to serve legal process. When this type of information gets criminalized or censored, it seems like corruption to the tax payers by government officials paid by the public. It’s every American’s Constitutional Right to write a complaint letter or book about someone that includes their names, addresses and phone numbers with public officials. This is especially being with no exceptions to the Constitution in which the Constitution primarily applies to Government Officials. Tallahassee Citizens, All Americans and Especially Public Officials Paid to Do So should risk their well-being everyday while exercising their personal Constitutional and Civil rights with their civic responsibility to America to defeat these types of tyrant actions in violation of the 1st and 14th Amendments in a Federal Ruling By Honorable Federal Judge Richard Smoak. Accepting Free Speech and Free Press that we Deplore as much as we Admire is exactly what Defeats America having a Tyrant Government Regime in America just like the one of Nazi, Germany.
THE FEDERAL JUDGE MADE THE RIGHT DECISION! Everyone below Federal Judge Richard Smoak among the Leon County Court did not make the right decisions for trampling constitutional rights with no legal right and that’s a matter of Federal Law without any arguments with No Appeal. The Case Ruling Stands and Unappealed. It would be great if Officer’s didn’t abuse their Power and Authority as given to them as a privilege for working to the public as they need to Protect and Serve the public as paid to do. The Police Have the Right to Protect and Serve Citizens as their First Priority as they claim. And, after that, they need to protect The Constitutional and Civil Rights of Our Citizens that do pay them. CITIZENS HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND POLICE OFFICERS HAVE PRIVELIGES. PRIVELIGES CAN BE REMOVED MORE EASILY THAN AMERICAN RIGHTS AS DEFINED IN THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS. THE PRIVELIGE OF FLORIDA STATUTE 843.17 WAS REMOVED BECAUSE IT WASN’T EVEN USED CORRECTLY AS ANY LAW. WE LIVE IN AMERICA AS STATED BY JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK! WIRED MAGAZINE HAS HAILED THE CASE AS “THE DUMBEST CAES EVER” BECAUSE POLICE DIDN’T HAVE THE RIGHT OF ANY SUBSTANTIAL JUSTIFICATION TO INTERFERE WITH FREE PRESS!
This action might not be possible to undo. Are you sure you want to continue?
We've moved you to where you read on your other device.
Get the full title to continue reading from where you left off, or restart the preview.