You are on page 1of 14

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM

Name of Employee : _____________________ Name of Rater : JULIET A.
MAGALLANES, Ed.D.
Position : Education Program Supervisor Position : Chief EPS-CID
Review Period : ____________________________ Date of Review :
___________________________
Region / Division: Region IX- Zamboanga del Sur

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION
MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.
1. Division 1.1 Assisted in the 5-Outstanding
Plans enhancement and Assisted in the  100% assistance to
Preparation, Implementation of the enhancement of the DEDP DEDP and SIP Monthly
Monitoring  Performed 4 specified
Division Education through the following:
and activities with
Evaluation Development Plan Served as member of the
supporting
(DEDP) and SIP. Division Planning team documents
Implemented activities
based on learning area /
program assigned
Assisted in the review /
assessment of SIP/AIP
on assigned surrogate
qualci with TA report.
 Prepared & submitted
Monthly Monitoring report
on SIP/AIP
Implementation.
4-Very Satisfactory  Performed 3 activities Quarterly
 Assisted 80-89% in the with complete reports
enhancement of the
DEDP/SIP

2 Prepared action 5-Outstanding Jan. – June 2016 Plan on assigned area Prepared Specific action of instruction and assisted in the plan on assigned area of preparation. TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE. instruction and special implementation and project or program evaluation of AIPs. 3-Satisfactory   Performed 3 Semester  Assisted 70-79% in the activities with enhancement of the incomplete reports DEDP/SIP 2-Unsatisfactory   Performed 2 Annually Assisted 60-69% in the activities with enhancement of the DEDP/ complete report 1-Poor  Assisted 59% and below in Performed 1 activity Annually the enhancement of the with reports DEDP/SIP DEDP/SIP 1.-Dec. improvement of teacher/staff teaching techniques development and school and strategies and facilities Jan. coordinated projects/programs and Prepared guidelines on activities on matters pertaining to curriculum curriculum development. 2016 school facilities Provided technical development in public assistance on and private schools improvement of teaching . implementation.

. 4-Very Satisfactory Jan. strategies Provided technical inputs on school physical facilities TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE. 2.10 monthly instructional prepared and  Every 10th day of the and teachers / schools per supervisory plan submitted succeeding month Monitoring month.December 4 activities undertaken supported with reports Jan.December 3-Satisfactory 3 activities undertaken supported with reports Jan.December Only one activity undertaken supported with report 2.  Submitted consolidated and Instructional and .... Development /improvement in both public and private schools.December 2-Unsatisfactory 2 activities undertaken supported with reports 1-Poor Jan.1 Conducted 5-Outstanding Instructional instructional  Prepared and submitted  All requirements Supervision supervision to 8 .

Evaluation Monitoring report to CID Office every 10th day of the succeeding month TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.Very Satisfactory  3 requirements met Every 15th day of the  80-89% instructional with complete succeeding month supervision conducted reports. 3-Satisfactory  70-79% instructional  2 requirements met Every 17th day of the supervision conducted with complete succeeding month 2-Unsatisfactory reports  60-69% instructional supervision conducted 1-Poor  1 requirement met Every 20th day of the  59% and below instructional with incomplete succeeding month supervision conducted report  1 requirement met Every 25th day of the with no reports succeeding month 2.  Conducted pre and post conference with school heads and teachers  Conducted classroom observation to 6 to 10 teachers / schools 4.2 Provides technical 5-Outstanding assistance (field 100% technical assistance technical asistance) to provided to school heads  10 school heads Monthly school heads on on conduct of process provided technical instructional observation assistance .

teachers on lesson 100% orientation provided to  20 teachers planning teachers on lesson oriented on lesson planning/ log sheets plan/ log sheet preparation preparation 4-Very Satisfactory 80-89% technical assistance provided to school heads on conduct of process  8 school heads Monthly observation with provided technical supporting documents assistance 80-89% orientation provided to teachers on lesson planning/ log sheets preparation  16 teachers 3-Satisfactory oriented on lesson 70-79% technical assistance plan/ log sheet provided to school heads preparation on conduct of process observation with supporting documents  6-7 school heads Monthly 70-79% orientation provided provided technical to teachers on lesson assistance planning/ log 2-Unsatisfactory 60-69% technical assistance  12-14 teachers provided to school heads oriented on lesson on conduct plan/ log sheet preparation  4-5 school heads Monthly provided technical . supervision and TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

assistance TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE. of process observation with supporting documents 60-69% orientation provided to teachers on lesson 10-11 teachers oriented planning/ log sheets on lesson plan/ log preparation sheet preparation 2-Unsatisfactory 59% and below technical  3 and below school assistance provided to heads provided Monthly school heads on conduct technical of process observation assistance with supporting documents 59% and below orientation 9 and below teachers provided to teachers on oriented on lesson lesson planning/ log plan/ log sheet sheets preparation preparation .

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE. .

. TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

. TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE. .

TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE. .

. TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

. TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.

. TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATION MFO KRA OBJECTIVES TIMELINE WEIGHT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ACTUAL RESULT SCORE QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T AVE.