You are on page 1of 162

Stan J.

Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200

LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS


MAJISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGE ADAM J. WITKONIS - MDJ-02-1-01
___________________________________________________

Stanley J. Caterbone :
DEFENDANT : MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016
:
:

NOTICE OF APPEAL FOR TRIAL DE NOVO

AND NOW, on this 18th day of February 2017, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE, appearing pro se,
do hereby file this NOTICE OF APPEAL FOR TRIAL DE NOVO TO THE TRAIL COURT FINDING
OF GUILTY ON FEBRUARY 13, 2017 AT THE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT, NAMED ABOVE, FOR
THE CHARGE OF LO-198-4 (LEAD) NOISE TO LOUD. ATTACHED ARE THE FOLLOWING:
1. MOTION TO DISMISS
2. IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION
I, Stanley J. Caterbone, do hereby request the court to extend in writing in a timely
manner the Court's decision on the IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION, and to the extend
necessary any filing fees that are required for the above NOTICE OF APPEAL FOR TRIAL DE
NOVO. I would also request from the PRESIDENT JUDGE OF THE LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF
COMMON PLEAS, a waiver for the NEW CELL PHONE AND ELECTRONICS POLICY, being that I,
Stanley J. Caterbone, has many current cases before this court, as a pro se litibgant and the
restriction would bear an unfair and prejudicial burden to all litigation before this COURT.

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page 1 of 90


22 Saturday February 18, 2017
Dated February 18, 2017

___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and
publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud
within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the
truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public
corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications
are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a
member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County
and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture
from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?

ACTIVE COURT CASES


J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT
OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL
LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for
Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-
49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR
HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-
0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015;
16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472 INJUNCTION re Pain
Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case No. 16-10157

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page 2 of 90


22 Saturday February 18, 2017
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page 3 of 90 Saturday February 18, 2017


U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE
LANCASTER DISTRICT
COUNTY COURTOFOF
PENNSYLVANIA
COMMON PLEAS
NOTICE OF APPEAL FOR TRIAL DE NOVO
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
for the THIRD CIRCUIT

Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief


In re: Stanley Caterbone )
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
(E.D.Pa. No. 2-16-mc-00049) )
)
)
v. )
) No. MJ-02-02101-NT-0001214-2016
)
)
)
)

AFFIDAVIT ACCOMPANYING MOTION


FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS

Affidavit in Support of Motion Instructions

I swear or affirm under penalty of perjury Complete all questions in this application and
that, because of my poverty, I cannot prepay then sign it. Do not leave any blanks: if the
the docket fees of my appeal or post a bond for answer to a question is "0," "none," or "not
them. I believe I am entitled to redress. I swear applicable (N/A)," write that response. If you
or affirm under penalty of perjury under need more space to answer a question or to
United States laws that my answers on this explain your answer, attach a separate sheet of
form are true and correct. (28 U.S.C. 1746; paper identified with your name, your case's
18 U.S.C. 1621.) docket number, and the question number.

xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Stanley J. Caterbone August
February 31,
18,2016
2017
Signed: _____________________________ Date: _____________________________
December 21, 2016

My issues on appeal are:

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
See Preceding Paragraph in THIRD CIRCUIT FULLY COMPLETED AFFIDAVIT OF
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
POVERTY of August 31, 2016.

czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
16-3283 In Forma Pauperis
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page
Page11
10
4 of 90
197
198 Wednesday August 18,
Saturday February 31, 2017
2016
1. For both you and your spouse estimate the average amount of money received from each
of the following sources during the past 12 months. Adjust any amount that was received
weekly, biweekly, quarterly, semiannually, or annually to show the monthly rate. Use
gross amounts, that is, amounts before any deductions for taxes or otherwise.

Income source Average monthly Amount expected next


amount during the past month
12 months
You Spouse You Spouse
Employment $ $ $ $
Self-employment $ $ $ $
Income from real property (such as $ $ $ $
rental income)
Interest and dividends $ $ $ $
Gifts $ $ $ $
Alimony $ $ $ $
Child support $ $ $ $
Retirement (such as social security, $ $ $ $
pensions, annuities, insurance)
Disability (such as social security, $ 1357.00 $ $ 1357.00 $
insurance payments)
Unemployment payments $ $ $ $
Public-assistance (such as welfare) $ $ $ $
Other (specify): $ $ $ $

Total monthly income: $ $ $ $


1357.00 1357.00

2. List your employment history for the past two years, most recent employer first. (Gross
monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.)

Employer Address Dates of employment Gross


monthly pay
None Pro Se Litigation $

czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
16-3283 In Forma Pauperis
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page
Page12
11
5 of 90
197
198 Wednesday August 18,
Saturday February 31, 2017
2016
$
$

3. List your spouse's employment history for the past two years, most recent employer first.
(Gross monthly pay is before taxes or other deductions.)

Employer Address Dates of employment Gross


monthly pay
$
$
$

4. How much cash do you and your spouse have? $________

Below, state any money you or your spouse have in bank accounts or in any other
financial institution.

Financial Institution Type of Account Amount you have Amount your


spouse has
Members1st checking $ 9,200.00 $
TD Ameritrade Money Market 13,000.00
$$7,000.00 $
$ $

If you are a prisoner, you must attach a statement certified by the appropriate institutional
officer showing all receipts, expenditures, and balances during the last six months in your
institutional accounts. If you have multiple accounts, perhaps because you have been in
multiple institutions, attach one certified statement of each account.

5. List the assets, and their values, which you own or your spouse owns. Do not list clothing
and ordinary household furnishings.

Home Other real estate Motor vehicle #1


(Value) $ 20,000.00 (Value) $ (Value) $ -10,000.00
1/4 Interest 1250 Fremont St Make and year: Reposession

czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
16-3283 In Forma Pauperis
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page
Page13
12
6 of 90
197
198 Wednesday August 18,
Saturday February 31, 2017
2016
2004 HYUNDAI SANTA FE $4,000.00 SANTA FE
Model:
NO LOANS
Registration #:

Motor vehicle #2 Other assets Other assets


(Value) $ (Value) $ (Value) $
Make and year:
Model:
Registration #:

6. State every person, business, or organization owing you or your spouse money, and the
amount owed.

Person owing you or your spouse Amount owed to you Amount owed to your
money spouse
Accounts Receivables - Exhibit $ 434,327.00 $
$ $
$ $
$ $

7. State the persons who rely on you or your spouse for support.

Name [or, if a minor (i.e., underage), initials only] Relationship Age

czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
16-3283 In Forma Pauperis
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page
Page14
13
7 of 90
197
198 Wednesday August 18,
Saturday February 31, 2017
2016
8. Estimate the average monthly expenses of you and your family. Show separately the
amounts paid by your spouse. Adjust any payments that are made weekly, biweekly,
quarterly, semiannually, or annually to show the monthly rate.

You Your Spouse


Rent or home-mortgage payment (including lot rented for $ 300.00 $
mobile home)
Are real estate taxes included? Yes No
Is property insurance included? Yes No
Utilities (electricity, heating fuel, water, sewer, and telephone) $ 510.00 $
Home maintenance (repairs and upkeep) $ 300.00 $
Food $ 200.00 $
Clothing $ 50.00 $
Laundry and dry-cleaning $ $
Medical and dental expenses $ 100.00 $
Transportation (not including motor vehicle payments) $ 100.00 $
Recreation, entertainment, newspapers, magazines, etc. 50.00
$ 300.00 $
Insurance (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage payments)
Homeowner's or renter's: $ 30.00 $
Life: $ $
Health: $ 145.00 $
Motor vehicle: $ 0.00 $
Other: $ 200.00 $
Taxes (not deducted from wages or included in mortgage $ $
payments) (specify):
Installment payments
Motor Vehicle: $ $
Credit card (name): $ $
Department store (name): $ $
Other: $ $
Alimony, maintenance, and support paid to others $ $

czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
16-3283 In Forma Pauperis
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page
Page15
14
8 of 90
197
198 Wednesday August 18,
Saturday February 31, 2017
2016
Regular expenses for operation of business, profession, or $ $
farm (attach detailed statement)
Other (specify): $ $
Total monthly expenses: 1,625.00 $
$ 2,432.00

9. Do you expect any major changes to your monthly income or expenses or in your assets
or liabilities during the next 12 months?

Yes No If yes, describe on an attached sheet.

10. Have you paid or will you be paying an attorney any money for services in
connection with this case, including the completion of this form? Yes No

If yes, how much? $ ____________


If yes, state the attorney's name, address, and telephone number:

11. Have you paid-or will you be paying-anyone other than an attorney (such as a paralegal
or a typist) any money for services in connection with this case, including the completion
of this form? Yes No

If yes, how much? $ ____________


If yes, state the person's name, address, and telephone number:

12. Provide any other information that will help explain why you cannot pay the docket fees
for your appeal. In Chapter 11 Reorganization Case No. 17-10615 there are listed approximatley
$140,000.00 in unsecured liabilities, the majority of which is the result of 1987
See Preceding Paragraph - AFFIDAVIT
claims of violations THAT
of civil rights, COMPLIES
anti-trust, WITH
public corruption, RULE
etc., 24(A)
stemming from
(1) the 1987 FEDERAL WHISTLEBLOWING ACTIVITIES, which began in June of 1987.
Attached is the RERORGANIZATION AND DISCLOSURE PLAN ALREADY DOCKET
IN THE ABOVE CHAPTER 11 CASE.
13. State the [city and state] of your legal residence.
Lancaster, Pennsylvania
XXXXXX
669-2163
717 _______________
Your daytime phone number: (____) 598-2200

58
Your age: ________ 16
Your years of schooling: ________
0959
[Last four digits of] your social-security number: _______

czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
16-3283 In Forma Pauperis
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page
Page16
15
9 of 90
197
198 Wednesday August 18,
Saturday February 31, 2017
2016
Case: 15-3400 Document: 003112143900 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/02/2015

! " #
$ " # % & ' ( " )( ))
! " # $ % & ' $$ !

( )* # " + # " , + ( - ./*0


(* ) + + + , +
( - .) ) /) +% *"
& ( +0
( ) * *+ .

1 ' 2 3 - 45* **0 67

( ). # " + ' $$ ! $ $1 (
8 * .//6 " ( -* .//4

1 . 2 0 2#
$ + 1 . 3 4 0

' 2 37-7 -.6 0/

' 1
1 ' . ./*0 2 37 .90 77- .7

5 "

czfbzgfzddvdvd
Case No. 16-3284
16-3283 In Forma Pauperis
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page
Page17
16
10of
of198
197
90 Wednesday August 18,
Saturday February 31, 2017
2016
COLLUSION by the Lancaster City Police Department Cost Me $16,000 Cash In a Few Weeks

%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !

((( &&" " ! & )#


# *& !" #

# +$ ,-.+

/ ! )/ $
/ "" / '0 " #&!

!!

# * (#& #

1 ) "" # " ! -2..-+.-32.4 567$,7- --8

"

# ! $ " ! % " & % % ' ( ) &" % !


' *+,-, ! " ! ) ) ' ! !! & . '
( & " % / % % ' ) % $ ' ( ) ' % ! / !
" ) ) " ' # 0 , / % !'
( " % " ' " . 1" ' " %. & ( % ! !!
"
& ! ) ' $ & ! '. ) !!' 2 % 2 3" )
" ' & ( % " % . & / " !! " " 4.
' !! ( & " % ) % % ) ! ' !! & % ! /
! ! ! " $ % ) " ' ) " ) % % ! ' '
$" ! & $ % / ' " " !! 5 % / '! . 1" '
" %. & % $ " 4 ' ) " % % $ " ' $ " )
" 63 7 % " ! . ! & ( ' ( % " $ 4
" & % % / % / !! 8 9 % / ) /.

: ) !' '! % ( ) $" " ( /" ' ! !


; !' 6 . & " %% !
( %% % " ! . 1" ! " &
!% ( < ! " ) % *+,-, ! $ ! ( 3
. & %% ! ) !! " . 1" ; !' 6 .
! % / " )$ % . =' 6 . > ; 0 4
? ? $ ( 4 $ % ' / , ( <" . =' 6< . =
' /" " & !! % ' ( 4' % $( 4 .

& " % ! " 8 /" =@A5,+B $ " ) A "!8 , !


. 1" ( !! % $ 6 . ! % / " /. !' A "!8 ! %
) " ) ) " / " $ & " ; !' " ) ! ( ( & " % /
" A "!8 4 ' " " & " % % " " )
! . & / " (! ' ) % / ' ! / % / "
!! " $ " $ " " / / ' " ) ' 4 . & $

Letter to Chris Reeser re ALLSTATE


MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 CLAIM
NOTICE OF Page11
APPEAL Page 1 of 90
4 Thursday
Saturday October18,
February 6, 2017
2016
COLLUSION by the Lancaster City Police Department Cost Me $16,000 Cash In a Few Weeks

% ) " ! /' " " %% $ " .

=' 6 . : % ' ' ! " ) " . &


% " " (! ' ' % !! ) ' " " ! 4 )
( % % % ! % $ " % ) ' % !! .
1" ' " ( % % ! ! / / . + $& !' " / ) "
" !).

1" ( / ' ! !! ; !' 63 3 . .

0 !! " !' " !) " '. ) / # 4 ) ," ) % '


/ ! ' ) ' % 5- & % % % " " !
) " ! 4 !' $ !% " ! ) % % " "! % ! "
( / ! / !! ) ' % " % " $ ' ) ( / ! %
% % $" " $ !% ( " ) ' !) . " % ) / &
% " " ! % ( " 3" & ! ) " " ! 4 / / /
( / % 4 " . & " ) % " 5 4= / ,)) ) " " ))
"
% ( " % % % < ' % % %$ "
" 4 + . <6 . % " % ' % " ) C*& ,
& ) ; !' 6 . . 0 !! D % ' / , ( "
$ ! ) 4 /! + "= ' '! . & % !'
) % ' ' C*& , % % ! " ! ! $" " % %
' ! '.

0 !! ) & " % ! !' % % " " % " "


% '% % " " ! ! ( ! % " *++ ,1 =- ) %% " "
"' ! ! ! ' . 1 % ' *++ ,1 ) % " " $ ! )
' ! / . 1 % ' & ) % $ " ' ( 4 " " " 4 ! % ) '
"
( % " ! % ( " % ' ) " . + $
C*& , ) / % $ " ! % $ ) / " ! ( '
" ! ! % " + ! ! - " ! ( % " ) " & ! /
" ' $ " " ' ! . & $ !! ! " ! "
" % ' / % ! % ( . $ & ! 6 .
" ) " ) . & ! " % ( =,1&,+ ,5 ,+1&+: + * ) !! ) ' %
) % ! " & !' ! / / % " ) " ' !
" ! " %. 9 : :; 9 9 <; 9
:: <; ;

($ ' ' ! $ ' #" ! ! ( )) =! "' 67$,7- -- (


( / 67$,7- / )) =! "' 6>$,-- -- ? ' ,--2 $
6.+$--- -- ! # / / " .-- / ? ) !""! & ? "" ? /! $
(/!#/ ! " / 6.,$3--$ ! "" )$ @ ! A

Letter to Chris Reeser re ALLSTATE


MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 CLAIM
NOTICE OF Page12
APPEAL Page 2 of 90
4 Thursday
Saturday October18,
February 6, 2017
2016
COLLUSION by the Lancaster City Police Department Cost Me $16,000 Cash In a Few Weeks

) >$ ,-.+

/ ! $ '? "" # 1 " ! -2..-+.-32.4

"

, % ' / " " 4 % % ) % ' *+,-, !


E " % % . : # " F / G % $ !% " ( 5* &5* %
$ !% !' " #&, " . + $ " % % !' ( 6 . ( ) !' '
% " $ 0&+ ,0 / ' $" " " 6 . . & $
# # ' % 5 % % " % ! ) 6 . . & " ) %
! ) " = ) - )$ ( ) & " % ' ) ! %
!! % $ ! " 4 %. & $ / ' &= 1, 6 . 0 & 0&
,-*5 , 1 * =& * +*,: &1*= #5,A*+ + ?,5 1, *+ 1 * 1 =,+1 .

$ :! !&

%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !

((( &&" " ! & )#


# *& !" #

Letter to Chris Reeser re ALLSTATE


MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 CLAIM
NOTICE OF Page13
APPEAL Page 3 of 90
4 Thursday
Saturday October18,
February 6, 2017
2016
COLLUSION by the Lancaster City Police Department Cost Me $16,000 Cash In a Few Weeks

9 9 9 9 < $ : 9 9

-BC.+CD---3 ??!# ? / ! # ! = # ! $ ! 9/! ! # !


? )) " C : 9 : 9 < : 9;
< % < E -BC.+CD---2+ :: :: 9 9 9 9

9/! ! # ! ? )) " + . 3< / ) .. < F ) #'


)) "H + . < 9? :! !#/ "" : H < 9?
:! !#/ "" : EH H << <

! !# ! !# ? + . < < ! ! ?
) E < < ,--3 ! E + . < / ) ..
)) "E 3<H < 9? :! !#/ "" : E 33H <
3 3 E

! !# ! " ! !# ? .+C# C.>3. 9 9


<

( " / ? '" ! !#! " # < G ,-.+C2+,


! / ' ) ! & : < (

'" ! ) + .< = : # '


! H + .< = : # ! ' "!# ) .H
+ . =1 H < =1 E 3 == !# ? 4 /" 4

) ! ? '" ! + . = "! ! ' & #'


H # ! H ? 4 /" 4 ..+2 ,-.+H + .
= H = E .+C.,.D "! ! ' H # ! ? ,-.+

: # ' ? " + . & 3< "! ! '


& #' H # ! ? ! !# ! H + . 3 H H
< & <

< F ) #' ? 9/ ! !# ? '" ! .+C.-.3>

Letter to Chris Reeser re ALLSTATE


MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 CLAIM
NOTICE OF Page14
APPEAL Page 4 of 90
4 Thursday
Saturday October18,
February 6, 2017
2016
COLLUSION by the Lancaster City Police Department Cost Me $16,000 Cash In a Few Weeks

%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !

((( &&" " ! & )#

& **$ *+,-

. ! $ '/ "" # 0 " ! +1,,+-,+21,3

!"

#$ % & % ' % ( %% ) (% ( (
" % &% ( * + ( ! , (

" " (( - ( ( -,- ( 4 "" # " !


+1,,+-,+21,3 * " ' !"" # " ! ! / "! 5. /
**+ !"" $ & ,62,- 7 & **$ *+,-4
% $ ( " % $
." / 0 -

$ 8! !&

%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !

((( &&" " ! & )#


# 9& !" #

5 5
+:7,-7;+++2 //!# / . ! # ! < # ! $ ! 5.! ! # ! / )) " 7
8 5 8 5 = 8 5> 1 ( 1 ? +:7,-7;+++1- 88
88 5 5 5 5
5.! ! # ! / )) " ! 2 1 5/ 8! !#. "" 8 3 1
5/ 8! !#. "" 8 ?3 3 11 1
! !# ! !# / ! 2 1 3 413 1 5/ 8!
!#. "" 8 ? 443 1 4 4
( " . / '" ! !#! " # = @ *+,-71-* ! ) ,
! - &! - %! & 8 = (
'" ! ) ! - ! 2 5. 3 1 5. ? 4 55 !# / 3 ." 3
) ! / '" ! / 3 ." 3 ,,-1 *+,-3 ! 2
5 3 5
8 # ' / " ! 2 4 3 3 1 !# 1
= A ) #' / 5. ! !# / '" ! ! 2

Letter to Chris Reeser re ALLSTATE


MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 CLAIM
NOTICE OF Page15
APPEAL Page 1 of
of95
90 August 18,
Saturday February 22, 2017
2016
Stan J. Caterbone andCOLLUSION
Advanced Media
by theGroup
Lancaster City Police Department Cost
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA

Letter
2 Harleysville
to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 ALLSTATE
PaidOF
NOTICE CLAIM Page
Page16
APPEAL Page 21of
of95
7
90 Monday
Saturday August 18,
February 22, 2017
2016
Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group COLLUSION by the Lancaster City Police Department Cost
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA

SCHEDULE OF ARTICLES STOLEN, DAMAGED OR DESTROYED


k In Progress Report As Of October 12, 2005
INSURED: Stanley Caterbone

CLAIM NUMBER: M0-599782

ITEM WHERE DATE COST TO COST TO DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ALLOWED


(Give Full Description) PURCHASED PURCHAS REPLACE REPAIR CLAIMED
ED
Dragon Naturally Speaking EBay Auction Site 25-Feb-05 55.00
xPinnacle Video Capture Radio Shack, Willow Street, PA Feb 69.99

xNEW DAZZLE DIGITAL VIDEO EBay Auction Harold Bautista 6-Jun-05 78.99
CREATOR

LeadTech Video Capture Cyberwarehouse, Lancaster, PA 14-Sep-05 169.99

Creative MP3 Player Radio Shack, Plantation, Florida 27-Apr-05 529.99

xPlantronics Bluetooth Headset Cingular, Park City, Lancaster, PA 28-May-05 85.00

Motorola Bluetooth Headset


Online Prescription Glasses Glasses Direct, Online Merchant 22-Feb-05 159.99

Wal-Mart Prescription Glasses Wal-Mart, Kennett, MO 25-Jul-05 308.00 350


Motorola Cell Phone
LESS
DEDUCTIBLE
TOTAL $1,456.95

State law requires us to include the following statement - Any person who knowingly files a statement of claim containing any
false or misleading information is subject to criminal and civil penalties.

_________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________
SIGN HERE
C-I 139nj (4101)

2 Harleysville
Letter to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
ALLSTATE
Paid CLAIM Page
Page32of
of95
7 Monday August 22, 2016

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page 17 of 90 Saturday February 18, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group COLLUSION by the Lancaster City Police Department Cost
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA

SCHEDULE OF ARTICLES STOLEN, DAMAGED OR DESTROYED Page 2

INSURED: Stanley Caterbone

CLAIM NUMBER: M0-599782

ITEM WHERE DATE COST TO COST TO DEPRECIATION AMOUNT ALLOWED


(Give Full Description) PURCHASED PURCHAS REPLACE REPAIR CLAIMED
ED
CD Rom Drive HP Desktop Cyberwarehouse, Lancaster, PA 20-May-05 129.99
Computer
AT&T Blackberry PDA EBay Auction Site 6-Apr-05 149.99
HP LaserJet 6 Toner EBay Auction Site 7-Apr-05 33.07
Compaq Keyboard Cyberwarehouse, Lancaster, PA 20-May-05 49.99

New DeLorme Earthmate GPS www.qpsworldsupply.com 25-Feb-05 126.90


Circuit Board for Magic Chef Range Willow Street, PA 25-Apr-05 69.99

Outdoor Table Broken on Oct 9, 2005 Kmart, Willow Street, PA May, 2000 200.00

2 Carton Marlboro Lights from Online 33.95


mailbox
-+

793.88
LESS
DEDUCTIBLE
TOTAL $2,913.90

State law requires us to include the following statement - Any person who knowingly files a statement of claim containing any
false or misleading information is subject to criminal and civil penalties.

_________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________
SIGN HERE
C-I 139nj (4101)

2 Harleysville
Letter to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
ALLSTATE
Paid CLAIM Page
Page43of
of95
7 Monday August 22, 2016

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page 18 of 90 Saturday February 18, 2017


Stan J. Caterbone andCOLLUSION
Advanced Media
by theGroup
Lancaster City Police Department Cost
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA

Letter
2 Harleysville
to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 ALLSTATE
PaidOF
NOTICE CLAIM Page
Page19
APPEAL Page 54of
of95
7
90 Monday
Saturday August 18,
February 22, 2017
2016
Stan J. Caterbone andCOLLUSION
Advanced Media
by theGroup
Lancaster City Police Department Cost
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA

Letter
2 Harleysville
to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 ALLSTATE
PaidOF
NOTICE CLAIM Page
Page20
APPEAL Page 65of
of95
7
90 Monday
Saturday August 18,
February 22, 2017
2016
Stan J. Caterbone and COLLUSION
Advanced Media
by the
Group
Lancaster City Police Department Cost
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA

Letter
2 Harleysville
to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 ALLSTATE
Paid CLAIM
NOTICE Page
Page21
OF APPEAL Page 76of
of
of95
7
90 Monday
Saturday August 18,
February 22, 2017
2016
Stan J. Caterbone andCOLLUSION
Advanced Media
by theGroup
Lancaster City Police Department Cost
220MeStone
$16,000
Hill Cash
Road,InConestoga
a Few Weeks
PA

Letter
2 Harleysville
to ChrisInsurance
Reeser reClaims
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 ALLSTATE
PaidOF
NOTICE CLAIM Page
Page22
APPEAL Page 87of
of95
7
90 Monday
Saturday August 18,
February 22, 2017
2016
COLLUSION by the Lancaster City Police Department Cost Me $16,000 Cash In a Few Weeks

! " # $" % & ' ($ $ % " $ ) * + ", $ ) * '


- $ .* / % " " $ , + ", $ 0

4$$ . 6$

! ""
# $ %&
6$ !*
' &
( & $-7 "1 " -1 )
$ $ * "$ '
* # $ * "$ " %
+ , -. !
*
* / 0 1 "
! & / %
1 *
. $ 2 *%
' . 3$ !
( & $ 4 5

/ 1 2

Letter to Chris Reeser re ALLSTATE CLAIM Page 9 of 95 August 22, 2016

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page 23 of 90 Saturday February 18, 2017


THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 NOTICE OF APPEAL Page 24 of 90 Saturday February 18, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

B25A (Official Form 25A) (12/11)

United States Bankruptcy Court


EASTERN District of PENNSYLVANIA

In re , STANLEY J. CATERBONE Case No. 17-10615REF


Debtor Small Business Case under Chapter 11

STAN J. CATERBONES PLAN OF REORGANIZATION, DATED FEBRUARY 7, 2017

ARTICLE I
SUMMARY

This Plan of Reorganization (the Plan) under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code The Code)
proposes to pay creditors of STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE DEBTOR (the Debtor) from PROCEEDS
FROM THE MYRIAD CLAIMS OF VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS, VIOLATIONS OF ANTI-TRUST,
VIOLATIONS OF THE RICO STATUTE, FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT RE ISC, INSURANCE CLAIMS
OF VANDALISM AND THEFTS, DAMAGES FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING, ETC., ALL OF WHICH HAVE
BEEN ACCRUING SINCE 1987. THESE CLAIMS ARE CURRENTLY IN LITIGATION IN FEDERAL
AND STATE COURTS. THESE CLAIMS HAVE ARE ALL WELL SUBSTANTIATED AND ARE
SUPPORTED WITH IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE IN THE FORM OF DOCUMENTS, AUDIO
RECORDINGS, AND VIDEOS. HOWEVER DUE TO THE HISORY OF STAN J. CATERBONE, THISE
CLAIMS HAVE BEEN POLITICIZED SINCE 1987 AND THE FBI COINTELPRO'S PRGOGRAM HAS
BEEN USED TO OBSTRUCT EFFORTS IN ALL OF THE COURTS. IT IS HIGHLY PREJUDICIAL AND
CRIMINAL TO ALLOW THIS CONDUCT TO PROCEED AND NOT ALLOW THIS REORGANIZATION
PLAN TO BE CONSUMATED FOR THE SAKE OF THE CREDITORS, WHO HAVE BEEN UNJUSTLY
PUNISHED JUST AS THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE. MANY OF THSES CASES HAVE RESULTED
IN ORDERS GRANTING PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE UNTIL THE
UNDOINFLUENCE, COMPUTER HACKING, HARASSMENT, VADALISM, ETC., IS REMOVED FROM
THE DEBTORS LIFE SO THAT THESE CLAIMS CAN BE FULLY LITIGATED WITHOUT
INTERRUPTION OR SETTLEMENTS REACHED. ALL OF THE USECURED CLAIMS IN THIS CASE
HAVE BEEN SPECIFICALLY DISPUTED DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE CLAIMS WERE THE DIRECT
RESULT OF THE VIOLATIONS OUTLINED HEREIN AND ARE NOT LEGALLY THE DEBT OF THE
DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE. IN ADDITION DUE TO THE COMPUTER HACKING TO THE
DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, MOST IF NOT ALL FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS WERE AND ARE
SUBJECT TO ERRORS AND/OR FALSE LEDGER BALANCES. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF
ACTIVE COURT CASES AND JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS WHICH SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE
PRECEEDING:

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149;
03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No.
16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for
Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States,
et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288;
06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-
1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint
against Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 1 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for
Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary
Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA
2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of
2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472
INJUNCTION re Pain Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167;
06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case
No. 16-10157

This Plan has no secured claims; and one class of of unsecured claims; and one class of
equity security holders. Unsecured creditors holding allowed claims will receive distributions, which the
proponent of this Plan has valued at approximately 100 cents on the dollar with accruing interest.
This Plan also provides for the payment of administrative and priority claims [if payment is not in full on
the effective date of this Plan with respect to any such claim (to the extent permitted by the Code or the
claimants agreement), identify such claim and briefly summarize the proposed treatment.]

All creditors and equity security holders should refer to Articles III through VI of this Plan for
information regarding the precise treatment of their claim. A disclosure statement that provides more
detailed information regarding this Plan and the rights of creditors and equity security holders has been
circulated with this Plan. Your rights may be affected. You should read these papers carefully and
discuss them with your attorney, if you have one. (If you do not have an attorney, you may
wish to consult one.)

ARTICLE II
CLASSIFICATION OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS

2.01 Class 1. All allowed claims entitled to priority under 507 of the Code (except
administrative expense claims under 507(a)(2), [gap
period claims in an involuntary case under 507(a)(3),] and
priority tax claims under 507(a)(8)).

2.02 Class 2. The claim of , to the extent allowed


as a secured claim under 506 of the Code.
[Add other classes of secured creditors, if any. Note: Section
1129(a)(9)(D) of the Code provides that a secured tax claim which
would otherwise meet the description of a priority tax claim under
507(a)(8) of the Code is to be paid in the same manner and over
the same period as prescribed in 507(a)(8).]

2.03 Class 3. All unsecured claims allowed under 502 of the Code.
[Add other classes of unsecured claims, if any.]

2.04 Class 4. Equity interests of the Debtor. [If the Debtor is an individual,
change this heading to The interests of the individual Debtor in
property of the estate.]

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 2 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

ARTICLE III
TREATMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSE CLAIMS,
U.S. TRUSTEES FEES, AND PRIORITY TAX CLAIMS

3.01 Unclassified Claims. Under section 1123(a)(1), administrative expense claims, [gap
period claims in an involuntary case allowed under 502(f) of the Code,] and priority tax claims are not in
classes.

3.02 Administrative Expense Claims. Each holder of an administrative expense claim allowed
under 503 of the Code [, and a gap claim in an involuntary case allowed under 502(f) of the Code,]
will be paid in full on the effective date of this Plan (as defined in Article VII), in cash, or upon such other
terms as may be agreed upon by the holder of the claim and the Debtor. THERE ARE NO
ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENSES CHARGED TO THIS PLAN, ONLY PRO SE BILLINGS, WHICH WILL BE
BILLED TO OTHER CASES INVOLVIING OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE CLAIMS.

3.03 Priority Tax Claims. Each holder of a priority tax claim will be paid [specify terms of
treatment consistent with 1129(a)(9)(C) of the Code]. There are no tax claims in this case.

3.04 United States Trustee Fees. All fees required to be paid by 28 U.S.C. 1930(a)(6) (U.S.
Trustee Fees) will accrue and be timely paid until the case is closed, dismissed, or converted to another
chapter of the Code. Any U.S. Trustee Fees owed on or before the effective date of this Plan will be paid
on the effective date.

ARTICLE IV
TREATMENT OF CLAIMS AND INTERESTS UNDER THE PLAN

4.01 Claims and interests shall be treated as follows under this Plan: Claims will have
equity interest in the federal and state civil actions taken to secure settlements for the above
mentioned violations; which will fund this proposed reorganization plan.

ALL UNSECURED CLAIMS ARE UNIMPAIRED AND WILL BE PAID IN FULL UPON THE
SETTELMENTS AS OUTLINED IN ARTICLE ONE THE SUMMARY.

ARTICLE V
ALLOWANCE AND DISALLOWANCE OF CLAIMS

5.01 Disputed Claim. A disputed claim is a claim that has not been allowed or disallowed [by a
final non-appealable order], and as to which either: (i) a proof of claim has been filed or deemed filed,
and the Debtor or another party in interest has filed an objection; or (ii) no proof of claim has been filed,
and the Debtor has scheduled such claim as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated. SEE ARTICLE ONE
SUMMARY FOR THE REASON WHY ALL UNSECURED CLAIMS ARE DISPUTED.

5.02 Delay of Distribution on a Disputed Claim. No distribution will be made on account of a


disputed claim unless such claim is allowed [by a final non-appealable order].

5.03 Settlement of Disputed Claims. The Debtor will have the power and authority to
settle and compromise a disputed claim with court approval and compliance with Rule 9019 of
the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 3 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

ARTICLE VI
PROVISIONS FOR EXECUTORY CONTRACTS AND UNEXPIRED LEASES

6.1 Assumed Executory Contracts and Unexpired Leases.

(a) The Debtor assumes the following executory contracts and/or unexpired leases
effective upon the [Insert effective date of this Plan as provided in Article VII, the date of the entry of
the order confirming this Plan, or other applicable date]:

[List assumed executory contracts and/or unexpired leases.]

(b) The Debtor will be conclusively deemed to have rejected all executory contracts and/or
unexpired leases not expressly assumed under section 6.01(a) above, or before the date of the order
confirming this Plan, upon the [Insert effective date of this Plan, the date of the entry of the order
confirming this Plan, or other applicable date]. A proof of a claim arising from the rejection of an
executory contract or unexpired lease under this section must be filed no later than __________ (___)
days after the date of the order confirming this Plan.

ARTICLE VII
MEANS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PLAN
[Insert here provisions regarding how the plan will be implemented as required under 1123(a)(5) of the
Code. For example, provisions may include those that set out how the plan will be funded, as well as who
will be serving as directors, officers or voting trustees of the reorganized debtor.]

This Plan of Reorganization (the Plan) under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code The Code)
proposes to pay creditors of STAN J. CATERBONE (the Debtor) from PROCEEDS FROM THE MYRIAD
CLAIMS OF VIOLATIONS OF CIVIL RIGHTS, VIOLATIONS OF ANTI-TRUST, VIOLATIONS OF THE
RICO STATUTE, FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT RE ISC, INSURANCE CLAIMS OF VANDALISM AND
THEFTS, DAMAGES FOR PAIN AND SUFFERING, ETC., ALL OF WHICH HAVE BEEN ACCRUING
SINCE 1987. THESE CLAIMS ARE CURRENTLY IN LITIGATION IN FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS.
THESE CLAIMS HAVE ARE ALL WELL SUBSTANTIATED AND ARE SUPPORTED WITH
IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE IN THE FORM OF DOCUMENTS, AUDIO RECORDINGS, AND VIDEOS.
HOWEVER DUE TO THE HISORY OF STAN J. CATERBONE, THISE CLAIMS HAVE BEEN
POLITICIZED SINCE 1987 AND THE FBI COINTELPRO'S PRGOGRAM HAS BEEN USED TO
OBSTRUCT EFFORTS IN ALL OF THE COURTS. IT IS HIGHLY PREJUDICIAL AND CRIMINAL TO
ALLOW THIS CONDUCT TO PROCEED AND NOT ALLOW THIS REORGANIZATION PLAN TO BE
CONSUMATED FOR THE SAKE OF THE CREDITORS, WHO HAVE BEEN UNJUSTLY PUNISHED JUST
AS THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE. MANY OF THSES CASES HAVE RESULTED IN ORDERS
GRANTING PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE UNTIL THE UNDOINFLUENCE,
COMPUTER HACKING, HARASSMENT, VADALISM, ETC., IS REMOVED FROM THE DEBTORS LIFE
SO THAT THESE CLAIMS CAN BE FULLY LITIGATED WITHOUT INTERRUPTION OR SETTLEMENTS
REACHED. ALL OF THE USECURED CLAIMS IN THIS CASE HAVE BEEN SPECIFICALLY DISPUTED
DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE CLAIMS WERE THE DIRECT RESULT OF THE VIOLATIONS
OUTLINED HEREIN AND ARE NOT LEGALLY THE DEBT OF THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE. IN
ADDITION DUE TO THE COMPUTER HACKING TO THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, MOST IF
NOT ALL FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS WERE AND ARE SUBJECT TO ERRORS AND/OR FALSE LEDGER
BALANCES. THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF ACTIVE COURT CASES AND JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS
WHICH SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS THE PRECEEDING:

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 4 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of
Appeals - COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149;
03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No.
16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for
Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States,
et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288;
06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-
1751 PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint
against Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for
Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary
Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA
2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of
2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472
INJUNCTION re Pain Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167;
06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case
No. 16-10157

ARTICLE VIII
GENERAL PROVISIONS

8.01 Definitions and Rules of Construction. The definitions and rules of construction set forth
in 101 and 102 of the Code shall apply when terms defined or construed in the Code are used in this
Plan, and they are supplemented by the following definitions: [Insert additional definitions if necessary].
THE PLAIN WILL FOLLOW THE RULES OF CIVIL PROCEURE FOR FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS
AND WILL BE CONTRAINED TO THE OPINIONS AND ORDERS RESPECTIVELY. THE DEBTOR,
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, WILL BE THE SOLE ADMINISTRATOR.

8.02 Effective Date of Plan. The effective date of this Plan is the first business day following
the date that is fourteen days after the entry of the order of confirmation. If, however, a stay of the
confirmation order is in effect on that date, the effective date will be the first business day after the date
on which the stay of the confirmation order expires or is otherwise terminated.

8.03 Severability. If any provision in this Plan is determined to be unenforceable, the


determination will in no way limit or affect the enforceability and operative effect of any other provision of
this Plan.

8.04 Binding Effect. The rights and obligations of any entity named or referred to in this Plan
will be binding upon, and will inure to the benefit of the successors or assigns of such entity.

8.05 Captions. The headings contained in this Plan are for convenience of reference only and do
not affect the meaning or interpretation of this Plan.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 5 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

[8.06 Controlling Effect. Unless a rule of law or procedure is supplied by federal law
(including the Code or the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure), the laws of the State of____________
govern this Plan and any agreements, documents, and instruments executed in connection with this Plan,
except as otherwise provided in this Plan.]

[8.07 Corporate Governance. [If the Debtor is a corporation include provisions required by
1123(a)(6) of the Code.]]

ARTICLE IX
DISCHARGE

[If the Debtor is not entitled to discharge under 11 U.S.C. 1141(d)(3) change this heading to
NO DISCHARGE OF DEBTOR.]

9.01. [Option 1 If Debtor is an individual and 1141(d)(3) is not applicable]


Discharge. Confirmation of this Plan does not discharge any debt provided for in this Plan until
the court grants a discharge on completion of all payments under this Plan, or as otherwise provided in
1141(d)(5) of the Code. The Debtor will not be discharged from any debt excepted from discharge under
523 of the Code, except as provided in Rule 4007(c) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

[Option 2 -- If the Debtor is a partnership and section 1141(d)(3) of the Code


is not applicable]
Discharge. On the confirmation date of this Plan, the debtor will be discharged from any
debt that arose before confirmation of this Plan, subject to the occurrence of the effective date, to
the extent specified in 1141(d)(1)(A) of the Code. The Debtor will not be discharged from any
debt imposed by this Plan.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 6 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

[Option 3 -- If the Debtor is a corporation and 1141(d)(3) is not applicable]


Discharge. On the confirmation date of this Plan, the debtor will be discharged from any
debt that arose before confirmation of this Plan, subject to the occurrence of the effective date, to
the extent specified in 1141(d)(1)(A) of the Code, except that the Debtor will not be discharged
of any debt: (i) imposed by this Plan; (ii) of a kind specified in 1141(d)(6)(A) if a timely complaint was
filed in accordance with Rule 4007(c) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure; or (iii) of a kind
specified in 1141(d)(6)(B).

[Option 4 If 1141(d)(3) is applicable]


No Discharge. In accordance with 1141(d)(3) of the Code, the Debtor will not receive
any discharge of debt in this bankruptcy case.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 7 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

ARTICLE X
OTHER PROVISIONS

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 16-2513 is a
Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief that was filed in order to clear the way and have
the courts provide IMMEDIATE RELIEF from all illegal and criminal activities that are
OBSTRUCTION JUSTICE in order for the DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE from litigating
settlements of remedy, relief, and monetary awards which are the primary and only source of
funding for the reorganization plan. There are also a multitude of JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS,
both in the OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPLEALS AND IN
THE PENNSYLVANIA JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD relating to the same. The following is the
language used in the INJUNCTION:

I) TITLE 18 - CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURE


1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
PART I - CRIMES
CHAPTER 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

(C) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge
of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible
commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation,
supervised release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings; shall be
punished as provided in paragraph (3).

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF


The Plaintiff alleges that he has been a prisoner of the state since 1987, and that the activities
surrounding the PLAINTIFF'S life has escalated into a daily occurrence of assaults. Unfortunately while
the PLAINTIFF'S has made many in person complaints to just about every law enforcement agency, the
pleas for help and assistance have yielded nothing but more attacks to the PLAINTIFF'S person,
property, electronics, home, auto, reputation, intellectual property, and lastly his mental state-of-mind A
BRUTAL ARRAY OF PSYCHOLOGICAL TORTURE. The PETITIONER has already made claims of
COINTELPRO-like tactics in his filings in the U.S.C.A. Case No. 15-3400 against these same said actors
and perpetrators. The PETITIONER will provide evidence to support this writ and offer a final remedy and
redress in accordance with federal law.

There are six essential prerequisites that a party must establish prior to obtaining a Preliminary
Emergency Injunction For Relief:

1. that the injunction is necessary to prevent immediate and irreparable harm that cannot be
adequately compensated by damages;
2. that greater injury would result from refusing an injunction than from granting it, and,
concomitantly, that issuance of an injunction will not substantially harm other interested parties in
the proceedings;
3. that a preliminary injunction will properly restore the parties to their status as it existed
immediately prior to the alleged wrongful conduct;
4. that the activity it seeks to restrain is actionable, that its right to relief is clear, and that the wrong
is manifest, or, in other words, that it is likely to prevail on the merits;
5. that the injunction it seeks is reasonably suited to abate the offending activity; and,
6. that a preliminary injunction will not adversely affect the public interest

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 8 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

RELIEF SOUGHT BY PLAINTIFF


The PLAINTIFF seeks immediate relief from the above in the form of sanctions and fines for those
guilty of extortion and embezzlement and those withholding accounts receivables. PLAINTIFF seeks
immediate relief from the law enforcement agencies that continue abuse of process. PLAINTIFF seeks
immediate relief from public officials for obstructing justice and due process. PLAINTIFF seeks relief, in
as much as the courts are able, with regards to the harassment and torture from those known of such
crimes. The Complainant seeks relief from stalking and harassing neighbors and requires law enforcement
to make sure households can identify all occupants and prove they are entitled to the lease and or deed.
Due to the actions and criminal activity of the above named DEFENDANTS, it is reasonable to prove that
every aspect of the PLAINTIFF'S life, is subject to undo influence; harassment; torture; obstruction; etc.
thus resulting in irreparable harm and injury. This situation and set of circumstances as outlined here, and
all previous filings; reports; and statements, is a prescription for only one endgame - death or suicide.
There is no life action or activity that is immune from this horrendous HATE CRIME. The precedent and
landmark elements that make this so appalling is that the Complainant has never done anything to set
these circumstances in motion but to be right regarding International Signal & Control back in 1987; as
well as many other proclamations and forecasts. That being said, it is also widely reported that many
Targeted Individuals and Victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control are lead to death and/or suicide. The
Lancaster Community-At-Large is guilty of creating; abetting; fostering; and executing this tragedy. The
fact that local; state; and federal law enforcement induce and encourage this environment of hate is
landmark.

The Courts must consider UNJUST ENRICHMENT in this case. (Wikipedia, The Free Dictionary by
FARLEX) - A general equitable principle that no person should be allowed to profit at another's expense
without making restitution for the reasonable value of any property, services, or other benefits that have
been unfairly received and retained. Although the unjust enrichment doctrine is sometimes referred to as
a quasi-contractual remedy, unjust enrichment is not based on an express contract. Instead, litigants
normally resort to the remedy of unjust enrichment when they have no written or verbal contract to
support their claim for relief. In such instances litigants ask a court to find a contractual relationship that
is implied in law, a fictitious relationship created by courts to do justice in a particular case.

The PLAINTIFF seeks a temporary injunction until a permanent resolution to ALL ISSUES
CONTAINED HEREIN are constructed and resolved in the myriad of civil actions pending before the courts
and those actions withdrawn without prejudice awaiting resolutions.

IRREPRABLE HARM
The irreparable harm and injure that has resulted from the above circumstances includes but is not
limited to the following:

Loss of personal property and real estate.


Loss of opportunity to secure personal property, business assets, and court related assets,
information, and evidence; including when sleeping (rape drug rohypnol).
Loss of protection from law enforcement at every level; local, state, and federal.
Loss of relationships including family; friends; and professional.
Loss of time and loss of life as a normal person would know it.
Loss of freedom of movement in Downtown Lancaster Entertainment Venues and Constant and
Never Ending Threats of Physical Harm, Harassment, Over-Charging on Cost of Goods,
intimidation, discrimination, and barring from entering public places and entertainment venues,
violations of intellectual property rights, and obstruction of justice.
Loss of freedom of movement; complainant has been denied every opportunity to secure his
personal and business assets at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania making it impossible
to travel or leave for any amount of time without fear of harm.
Loss of freedom of movement may constitute false imprisonment and may invoke the federal
Habeus CORPUS laws of freedom.
Loss of female companionship, and under constant mocking for it.
Loss of business opportunities.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 9 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Loss of accounts receivables.


Loss of professional and personal reputation; especially with specific regards to honesty and
integrity.
Civil and Criminal Conspiracy to manufacture mental illness symptoms and illnesses.

The PLAINTIFF acknowledges that this PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF
may lead to a landmark decision, however, the intelligence community, the law enforcement community,
and the military industrial complex has MADE CERTAIN THESE ACTIVITES AND POLICIES REMAINED
HIDDEN FROM THE CITZENRY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND GLOBALLY AS WELL. In fact, all
things considered, the incoming TRUMP ADMINISTRATION may welcome the purging of these
technologies, and tactics of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control; which are used by other criminal elements,
including foreign nations and possibly terrorist organizations.

The Complainant seeks relief by awarding the Complainant his PRO SE BILLINGS
INVOICE. The Complainant seeks relief by awarding the Complainant SUMMARY JUDGMENT in
all cases filed before the LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS and the U.S.
DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA in REMEDY AND RELIEF for
the ARROGANCE OF BOTH THE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNITY AND THE JUDICIAL
SYSTEM FOR THE SYSTEMIC ABUSE OF PROCESS AND THE EXTREME NATURE OF THE
OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE WHICH IN ITSELF IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PUTTING THE
COMPLAINANT'S LIFE IN HARMS WAY ON A DAILY BASIS.

ATTACHED IS THE LATEST ORDER FOR CASE NO. 16-2513 BY FEDERAL MAGISTRATE KANE ON
JANUARY 31, 2017. ALSO ATTACHED IS THE LATEST LETTER FROM THE PENNSYLVANIA
JUDICIAL BOARD REGARDING 2 EXISTING JUDICIAL COMPLAINTS. Pennsylvania Judicial
Conduct Board LETTER re 2016-788 (Asworth) 2016-789 (Reinaker) February 2, 2017.

Respectfully submitted,

By: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, THE DEBTOR


The Plan Proponent

By: NONE
Attorney for the Plan Proponent

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 10 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

B25B (Official Form 25B) (12/08)

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK


INTENTIONALLY

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 11 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

B25A (Official Form 25A) (12/11)

United States Bankruptcy Court


EASTERN District of PENNSYLVANIA

In re , STANLEY J. CATERBONE Case No. 17-10615REF


Debtor Small Business Case under Chapter 11

STAN J. CATERBONES DISCLOSURE STATEMENT, DATED FEBRUARY 7, 2017


Table of Contents
[Insert when text is finalized]

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 12 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

I. INTRODUCTION

This is the disclosure statement (the Disclosure Statement) in the small business chapter 11
case of STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE DEBTOR. This Disclosure Statement contains information about
the Debtor and describes the [insert name of plan] (the Plan) filed by [the Debtor] on [insert date]. A
full copy of the Plan is attached to this Disclosure Statement as Exhibit A. Your rights may be affected.
You should read the Plan and this Disclosure Statement carefully and discuss them with
your attorney. If you do not have an attorney, you may wish to consult one.
The proposed distributions under the Plan are discussed at pages __-__ of this Disclosure
Statement. [General unsecured creditors are classified in Class __, and will receive a distribution of ___ %
of their allowed claims, to be distributed as follows _________.]

A. Purpose of This Document

This Disclosure Statement describes:

The Debtor and significant events during the bankruptcy case,


How the Plan proposes to treat claims or equity interests of the type you hold (i.e., what you will
receive on your claim or equity interest if the plan is confirmed),
Who can vote on or object to the Plan,
What factors the Bankruptcy Court (the Court) will consider when deciding whether to confirm
the Plan,
Why [the Proponent] believes the Plan is feasible, and how the treatment of your claim or equity
interest under the Plan compares to what you would receive on your claim or equity interest in
liquidation, and
The effect of confirmation of the Plan.

Be sure to read the Plan as well as the Disclosure Statement. This Disclosure Statement
describes the Plan, but it is the Plan itself that will, if confirmed, establish your rights.

B. Deadlines for Voting and Objecting; Date of Plan Confirmation Hearing

The Court has not yet confirmed the Plan described in this Disclosure Statement. This section
describes the procedures pursuant to which the Plan will or will not be confirmed.

1. Time and Place of the Hearing to [Finally Approve This Disclosure Statement
and] Confirm the Plan

The hearing at which the Court will determine whether to [finally approve this Disclosure
Statement and] confirm the Plan will take place on [insert date] , at [insert time], in Courtroom ___,
at the [Insert Courthouse Name, and Full Court Address, City, State, Zip Code].

2. Deadline For Voting to Accept or Reject the Plan

If you are entitled to vote to accept or reject the plan, vote on the enclosed ballot and return the
ballot in the enclosed envelope to [insert address]. See section IV.A. below for a discussion of voting
eligibility requirements.

Your ballot must be received by [insert date] or it will not be counted.

3. Deadline For Objecting to the [Adequacy of Disclosure and] Confirmation of


the Plan Objections to [this Disclosure Statement or to] the confirmation of the Plan must be filed with
the Court and served upon [insert entities] by [insert date].

4. Identity of Person to Contact for More Information

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 13 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

If you want additional information about the Plan, you should contact [insert name and address
of representative of plan proponent].
STAN J. CATERBONE
(717) 598-2200 TEXT OR CALL
stancaterbone@gmail.com

C. Disclaimer

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly
discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within
International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a
$1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law
enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our
communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We
continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications are a means of protecting our rights to
continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed
from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my
Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?

II. BACKGROUND

A. Description and History of the Debtor=s Business


The Debtor, STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, is AN INDIVIDUAL, A CORPORATION, A FICTICIOUS
NAME, ALL CONDUCTING BUSINESS IN THE COMMOWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA SINCE 1986
UNDER VARIOUS NAMES AND REGISTRATIONS. SEE THE FOLLOWING RESUME AND
BIOGRAPHY FOR SPECFIC DETALS.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 14 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

April 20, 2016

Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Biography

Present - Advanced Media Group, President, Owner, and Founder.

In 1987 I became a federal whistleblower for the case of local defense contractor International Signal
and Control, or ISC. ISC was a black ops program for the NSA and CIA that was convicted in 1992 for an
elaborate scheme to arm Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries with a broad array of weapons, most
notably cluster bombs. It was the third larges fraud in U.S. History at that time. I have been a victim of
organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and direct energy weapons since 2005. I had also
been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control turned into an all-out assault of
mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy; hacking of all electronic devices; vandilism and thefts of personal
property, extortions, intellectual property violations, obstruction of justice; violations of due process;
thefts and modifications of court documents; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy
devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This
assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S.
District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This assault began after
the handlers remotely trained/sychronized Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference
opposed to most other victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with the same person who
declares telepathically she is a known celebrity. Over the course of 10 years I have been telepathic with
at least 20 known persons and have spent 10 years trying to validate and confirm their identities without
success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and
the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment and act on the numerous formal complaints that are filed in
their respective offices. Most complaints are focused on the routine victimization's of a targeted individual
including but not limited to stalking, harassment, threats, vandalism, thefts, extortion, burglaries, false
imprisonments, fabricated mental health warrants or involuntary commitments, pain and torture to the
body, and most often the cause of obstruction of justice is the computer hacking.

I have a very sophisticated and authentic library of evidence of the use of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
technologies on my father and brother that dates back to the 1940's while my father was in the U.S. Navy
after he graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Florida, including an affidavit motorized and
authenticated by my father in 1996. My brother served in the U.S. Air force and was victim to LSD
experiments of the infamous MKULTRA program in the late 1960's.

In 2016 I was the AMICUS for Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane in the Pennsylvania Superior
Court Case No. 1164 EDA 2016 in the COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Kane which included perjury
charges during the alleged leaking of grand jury information. Kathleen Kane took on the Good Old Boy
network regarding judicial reform in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in an effort to rid the state of the
long standing public corruption ring that was evident from local law enforcement to Supreme Court
Justices, and everyone in between.

In 2015 I filed an amicus curie on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert who was convicted in 1992 of the
murder of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I currently am in litigation in the U.S. Third
Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa Michelle Lambert published her book titled
Corruption in Lancaster County My Story, which is available in bookstores and on Amazon.com. I am
in frequent contact with her co-author, Dave Brown of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

In 2009 I Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT BILL to
Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of Lancaster Mayor
Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of Representative Jim Guest,
who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes for years. The bill will provide
protections to individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed by surveillance, and assaulted; as well
as protections to keep individuals from becoming human research subjects, tortured, and killed by
electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices, implants, and directed energy weapons. I again

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 15 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General Assembly in 2015 and frequented the Pennsylvania
Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor; which I still do to this day.

In 2006 I began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed as "FULT" on the
NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a full service financial firm,
Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic vision for his company and the
experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering efforts in dealing with Fulton Financial. I
have been in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of Directors with regards to various
complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank acquisition and the subprime failures. I believe
that Fulton Financial needs management to become more aggressive in it's strategic planning and the
performance it expects from it's management team in order to increase shareholder value. Expanding the
footprint of the regional bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is consistent with the
expectations of shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking institutions acquired by
larger regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will see in it's local marketplace as
well as in it's regional footprint.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current litigation in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third District Court
of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the Commonwealth Court
of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. These litigations include
violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust violations, and interference of contracts relating to
several business interests. Central to this litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial
Management Group, Ltd,/FMG Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along with a Federal False
Claims Act or Federal Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC)
the $1Billion Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation
dates back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited by ISC executives for
professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of RICO Civil Complaint in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, as
docket no. 05-2288.

In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to withhold the Tourism
Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot. We also proposed
an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and Lancaster Square to all of
the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is finally under construction with a
March 2009 Opening date.

In 2005 I was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City after submission of
an essay with and application. I received the invitation from Bruce R. Lindsey, Chief Executive Officer of
the William J. Clinton Foundation.

In 2005 I began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working with such
organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global Initiative, Lancaster
Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Toms Project Hope, People to People
International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline, Schreiber Pediatric Center,
and numerous others.

In 2004 I embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment industries with an emphasis
on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and royalties in the fight against
electronic piracy. We have attempted to assist in developing new business models to address the
convergence of physical and electronic mediums; as it displaces royalties and revenues for those creating,
promoting, and delivering a range of entertainment content via wireless networks.

In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array of marketing and communication tools for wholesalers of the AIM
Investment Group and managed several communication programs for several of the company wholesalers
throughout the United States and Costa Rica. We also began a Day Trading project that lasted until 2004
with success.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 16 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

In 1999 I developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery, known as
the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan was developed in
conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the Revitalization of Downtown
Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the former Watt & Shand building.

In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to counter the effects of
the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer technologies. I attended the U.S. Sponsored Y2K symposium
and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Senate Y2K Subcommittee and Senator William
Bennett.

In 1998 I had began to administer the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit organization
promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We had provided funding
for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The 24/7 Suicide Prevention
Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable organizations and faith based charities. The
video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to schools, non profit organizations, faith based
initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational support for the prevention of suicide and to bring
awareness to mental illness problems.

In 1996 I had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that I was controller of
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., I was retained by Gallo Rosso Restaurant and Bar to computerized their
accounting and records management from top to bottom. I had also provided consulting for the
computerization of accounting and payroll for Lancaster Container, Inc., of Washington Boro. I was
retained to evaluate and develop an action plan to migrate the Informations Technologies of the Jay
Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26 Million Dollar headquarters located in West
Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. The Jay Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies
hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I was consulting on the merits of migrating to a PC based real
time networking system throughout the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group employees some 500
employees with revenues in excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.

In 1993 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for saving the
company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the company was
facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We were responsible for
implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and procedures, human resource
policies and procedures, marketing strategies, performance measurement reporting, and negotiate for the
payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company was especially problematic, since it was the lifeline to
continue work and bidding for public contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County demanded a complete
accounting of the operations in order to stave off a default on the notes and loans it was holding. We
essentially revamped the entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in profits of 3
to 4 times its previous years, and record revenues.

In 1991 I was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador Program, which was
founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to To give specialists
from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively communicate with peers,
The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face scientific, technical, and professional exchanges
throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F. Kennedy, the State Department established a non-
profit private foundation to administer the program. We were scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and
Eastern Europe to discuss printing and publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the
world.

In 1990 I had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the governments technology think
tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-authored the article Escaping the Unix
Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine DISC, then one of the leading
publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy that technology whenever you
call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types of applications involving
telecommunications.

In 1989 I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic companies

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 17 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with commercial companies,
government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies. I performed services and contracts
for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards & Technology (NIST), Department
of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency,
Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft, AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond
Buyers, and a host of others. I also was working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing
various interactive mapping technologies, which is now a major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the
premier provider of mapping software and applications for the internet and is often used in delivering
maps and directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell American
Helix, the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly. We had brokered a deal and the executives
from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to discuss the deal and perform due diligence of
the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield Industrial Park.

In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as executive producer
of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a digital format; the
first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and created the concept for the
Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the copyright and marketing formula of
the DOLBY technology trademark.

We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording industry
featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of Philadelphia was the lead
patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station Studios was the brainchild of Tony
Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown when he was 15. Tony and Power Station
Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the country, and were responsible for developing Bon
Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper,
Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones, Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station
Studios had produced the original Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was released
for distribution and was the number one Sound Track recording of its time.

Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We had
developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the Digital
Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the commercialization
of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry simultaneously with the
release of the Digital Movie.

I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the
technology, similar to the DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power Station
Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a portable medium, a
compact disc.

In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a major
banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100 million dollars.
Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations from developers across
the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to raise capital that include both debt
and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity funding through private placements, and
debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood,
California to secure financing of their postproduction Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North
Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the
midst of replacing the current loan that was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and
discussions with Drew Anton of the Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were
quickly seeking commitments for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a number of
other prominent local developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High Industries,
and the Marty Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We were constantly
told that our financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 18 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services organization
comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a stock purchase
program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new firm. FMG had financial
planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability insurance services, tax
preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we
had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices in Pennsylvania, and

several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and our
advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees from the other
professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at about $3 to $4 million.

In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the Professional
Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting departments. (See
Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were dependant on the team scouts to
travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed a strategy of video taping the camp and
the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all of the scouting departments for teams in all
three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was signed at that camp by the Ottawa Roughriders of the
CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues most prominent
quarterbacks. My brother also played 2 years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino was starting
quarterback. We were a Certified Agent for the National Football League Players Association. Gene
Upshaw, the President of the NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp, while we were at a
Conference for agents of the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article about our camp and
associated it with other camps that were questionable about their practices. Actually, that was the very
reason for our camp. We had attended many other camps around the country that were not very well
organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants, with one player coming from as
far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a professional production company
filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video. The well respected and widely
acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys, had given me support for my
camp during some conversations We had with him and said he looked forward to reviewing the tapes for
any hopeful recruits.

In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International Association
of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4 times. We had
personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial Planner, Ms. Alexandria
Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150 professionals attended the
dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center. Ms. Armstrong discussed financial
planning and how all of the professions needed to work together in order to be most effective for their
clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax
specialists, estate planners, bankers, and investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial
planning was the way of the future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue Ball National Bank to
help them develop a Financial Planning department within their bank.

In 1984 I had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of Citi Group (the
largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to help advise on the future of
Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the investment industry at large. Mr. Weil
was performing due diligence for the merger of American Express and IDS (Investors Diversified
Services). We were at that time a national leader in the company in delivering Fee Based Financial
Planning Services, which was a new concept in the investment community and mainstream investors. That
concept is now widely held by most investment advisers.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 19 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

B. Insiders of the Debtor

[Insert a detailed list of the names of Debtor=s insiders as defined in 101(31) of the United
States Bankruptcy Code (the Code) and their relationship to the Debtor. For each insider, list all
compensation paid by the Debtor or its affiliates to that person or entity during the two years prior to
the commencement of the Debtors bankruptcy case, as well as compensation paid during the
pendency of this chapter 11 case.]
THERE ARE NO INSIDERS OF THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

C. Management of the Debtor Before and During the Bankruptcy

During the two years prior to the date on which the bankruptcy petition was filed, the officers,
directors, managers or other persons in control of the Debtor (collectively the Managers) were [List
the Managers of the Debtor prior to the petition date].
THERE ARE NO DIRECTORS, MANAGERS, OR THER PERSONS, OTHER THAN THE DEBTOR, STAN
J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

The Managers of the Debtor during the Debtors chapter 11 case have been: [List Managers of the
Debtor during the Debtors chapter 11 case.] After the effective date of the order confirming the Plan, the
directors, officers, and voting trustees of the Debtor, any affiliate of the Debtor participating in a joint Plan
with the Debtor, or successor of the Debtor under the Plan (collectively the Post Confirmation
Managers), will be: [List Post Confirmation Managers of the Debtor.] The responsibilities and
compensation of these Post Confirmation Managers are described in section __ of this Disclosure
Statement.

D. Events Leading to Chapter 11 Filing


[Describe the events that led to the commencement of the Debtors bankruptcy case.]

In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone went public with allegations of fraud within International Signal and
Control, or ISC as they were commonly referred. After discussions with ISC and United Chem Con
officials (an ISC/James Guerin straw company), and as a shareholder of record since 1983 of ISC, Stan J.
Caterbone had a meeting with an ISC executive on June 23, 1987, which resulted in a 22 year legal
odyssey. The discussions involved a joint venture with his company, Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
or FMG, Ltd., but ended in disclosure of his recent public allegations of fraud. Four years later, ISC
founder and chairman James Guerin, and other officials and companies pleaded guilty to a $1 Billion
Dollar Fraud and export violations including the selling of arms through South Africa to Iraq and Sadaam
Hussein. However, money, power, influence and public corruption had been used to cover-up the activities
and Federal False Claims Act violations of Stan J. Caterbone for the next eighteen years. There ensued a
total blockade of all United States Courts for all redress and remedy available in accordance with federal,
state, and local laws. This included recovery of his business interests; intellectual property; real estate;
personal and business real property; his unblemished and impressive reputation; and his most valuable
asset - the ability to produce income. This might be legally referred to as the Right-To-Work under federal
statutes. Notwithstanding, Stan J. Caterbone has never made a bad investment or developed a business
that did not make a profit over the next 22 years. This includes two real estate properties that were
illegally seized through foreclosure proceedings.

Since 1987 Stan J. Caterbone has been a prisoner and enemy of the state. ISC was a Department
of Defense (DOD) Contractor and a partner with United States Intelligence Agencies since it's beginings in
the early 1970's. One of it's first contracts was Project X with the National Security Agency or NSA of Ft.
Meade, Maryland.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 20 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

In summary, the following are facts and part of the public record regarding INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL
& CONTROL OR ISC:

Once the third (3rd) largest employer in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with
over 5,000 employees.
James Guerin, founder and CEO was once the largest philanthropist to charitable
organizations in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
The ISC/Ferranti Scandal was the third (3) largest white-collar fraud within the United
States as of 1992.

The following are some of the public officials and politicians associated with ISC:

George H.W. Bush, former U.S. President, and Director of the Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA).
Robert Gates, former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and current
Secretary of Defense.
Bobby Ray Inman, former Board of Directors if ISC, former Director of the NSA, and
currently associated and directly involved with Mind Control Research organizations.
Alexander Haig, former U.S. Secretary of State, and ISC lobbyist and Board of Directors?
Joseph McDade, former Pennsylvania House of Representative and Chair of the
Appropriations Committee who was later investigated for the United Chem Con scandal.
Carlos Cardoen/Cardoen Industries, a joint venture partner with ISC and arms
merchant for the cluster bomb who eventually sold to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
Countries under U.S. sanctions.
ISC was credited with the design of the cluster bomb, and has patents filed in the U.S.
Patent Office.
In 1987 ISC completed the merger with the 3rd largest defense contractor of Great Britain,
Ferranti International; who paid $1 billion dollars for ISC and all of it's subsidiaries.
ABC News/Financial Times aired 3 episodes on ABC Nightline with Ted Koppel regarding
the ISC/CIA defense weapons; technologies; and cluster bombs to Iraq story and lead into
the allegations that then nominee for the Director of CIA Robert Gates was involved with
ISC and the selling of arms to Iraq.
ABC News 20/20 aired a story on the ISC/CIA efforts to sell cluster bombs to Saadam
Hussein and Iraq on February 1, 1991 days after the start of the Persian Gulf War I, with
the initial bombing raid destroying a cluster bomb factory built in Iraq by Carlos Cardoen.
On July 1st and 2nd of 1987 Stan J. Caterbone solicited the legal counsel of Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda for counsel regarding, FMG, Ltd., International Signal & Control
(ISC); Commonwealth Bank, etc., and was billed for his services. Joseph Roda did
absolutely nothing but refute Stan J. Caterbone's claims and would not believe him.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), Lancaster
Attorney Joseph Roda represented William Clark, ISC's in-house legal counsel, and never
mentioned any conflict to Stan J. Caterbone in 1987.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas), James
Guerin deposited $1.75 million dollars into an escrow account at Fulton Bank, Lancaster,
County.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),
Christopher Underhill of Harman, Underhill & Brubaker, represented James Guerin. In
2005 Christopher Underhill represented the Manheim Township Police Department (05-cv-
2288 U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania) CATERBONE v. Lancaster
County Prison, et. al.,.
In Clark v. Guerin (CI-1990-0074 Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas),
Philadelphia Attorney Joseph Tate represented James Guerin and ISC, and in 2007 Joseph
Tate represented Scooter Libby during his federal prosecution by U.S. Special Prosecutor
Fitzpatrick.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 21 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

THE MANIFEST OF A COVER-UP

Not only did the allegations of fraud within ISC have to be silenced at a time when merger
negotiations were ongoing with Ferranti, but all of the fraud; extortion; public corruption; burglaries; civil
rights violations; anti-trust and intellectual property right violations; lender liability torts; false arrests;
false imprisonments; as well as other civil and criminal activities had to be covered up and buried in
bureaucratic red tape. Information and findings are still being uncovered and discovered to this day.
Contrary to popular belief, up until 1996 a grand jury investigation into ISC was still ongoing. It is not
known whether it has closed or not. All of these activates constitute a RICO crime due to the pattern and
organization of the perpetrators. The pattern and source of the activities can be traced back to 1987,
with subgroups changing over time, but still engaging in the same practices. The following plan of
action was followed in order to perpetrate the cover-up:

Totally discredit Stan(ley) J. Caterbone and any and all allegations in every way
possible.
Fabricate a history of mental illness.
Fabricate a criminal record.
Attach his character and honesty with rumors and propaganda.
Extort and maintain his net worth to $ zero or load him with debts.
Keep him out of any profession and or occupation when and where possible.
Totally isolate him and disenfranchise him from his friends, colleagues, and family
into a life of solitaire.
Somehow persuade the community of Lancaster County to buy into this plan of
action through money, favors, etc.,
Always keep attorneys and anyone remotely involved with the legal community
away at times when efforts for justice are pursued.
When attempts to enter the U.S. legal system arise, isolate, harass, and extort any
monies and/or possessions of value.
Change the history of events and the truth.

THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM

For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues from court
dockets and judges. During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least twenty attorneys, some
from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of specialties. Attorneys from New York
City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited and consulted as well as a group of ex FBI
agents who specialized in white collar crime that are now globally recognized. However, the money and
influence of persons and entities that wanted these issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so
complex and convoluted, and involved such high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to
state that there was no case, or their were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the
Republican Party and the Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that
could not be influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely
unprecedented in nature and in malice.

However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv-2288. This case is
still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J. Caterbone in October of 2008 after
a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals (07-4474) in September of 2008.
The case will be continued upon the security of evidence and the cease and desist of
obstruction of justice and due process. On May 16, 2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia,
Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal. One week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for
Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading, Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 22 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

petition for protection under the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.

These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet another
round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking with Directed
Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total Mind Control.

REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND WEAPONS.


Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud within
ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to suicide. As far
back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or "remotely viewed". This
was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and never written, spoken, or typed,
was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville,
(Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show murder case), someone introduced the
term remote viewing through an email. That was the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was
researched, but that was the extent of the topic. Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a
more direct and continuous way without success.

In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy;
synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices and weapons that
usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This assault was no
coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, or
CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This assault began after the handlers
remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference opposed to most other
victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she
is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying
to validate and confirm this person without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate,
and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached
documents for more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into mental
telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program labeled MK
ULTRA and it's subprograms.

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local, state, and
federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture, trespass, thefts, and
the like began in earnest. From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment of April
2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group
had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and rest due to the forced medication by Fairmount
Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz. The psychotropic drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in
an extreme state of confusion. By the end of the summer of 2010 every social media site, including the
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and coercion
by Detective Clark Bearinger.

In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the employees of the
Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building. Then soon after the
Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking Campaign. In addition an
extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in an effort to again SILENCE Stan J.
Caterbone and Advanced Media Group. And Again, the Lancaster City Police Department took the lead
role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state and federal authorities for help and assistance,
including direct communications with the White House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the
Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S. Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District
Attorney's Office. Since August 1, 2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6)
times due to computer hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and
restored.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 23 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus Corpus
Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul Diamond was presiding
since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to be granted and the case was
stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling evidence, or lack there of. The
Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial
Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle Lambert. In fact a working theory was filed that
suggested that the East Lampeter Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment
that lead to the unfortunate murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death
claim to be filed by the Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals,
Case No. 15-3400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to
free Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.

Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated Petition for
Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in the Fairmount
Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia. However, this time there was no MANDATORY Treatment Program
Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. So Stan J. Caterbone continued filing in the
courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a desperate attempt to stop the local torture
campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On
August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far as to undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered
by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions of West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling
hours of torture and a scam of $600.00.

On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger, Officer
Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman. The Complaint contained allegations of torture
and abuse at every moment of contact. The Lancaster City Police Department were so desperate for
retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert case, that they actually broke the door in of
1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the
Lancaster County District Attorney on August 8 th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by
the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.

On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey Wright, who
dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing Privileges
in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the U.S. Postal
Service and the computer hackers.

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County community-
at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis. The community targeting
theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr. John Hall. The community
hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P.
Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.

In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45 audio


cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to 1996. The
tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.
In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J. Caterbone, was most likely a
target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001
was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.

In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National Institute of

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 24 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to find a genetic
marker for depression in the CATERBONE family. Phil interviewed all living descendants and relatives of
my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am alleging that this was a deliberate act
to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and provide plausible deniability for any linkage to
U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.

WAS THE PLAINTIFF PLACED ON TERRORIST LIST BY HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY TOM
RIDGE IN 2004?
On March 8, 2016 I was illegally detained, handcuffed and interrogated by no less than eight (8)
National Security Agency Police in the barracks of Ft. Meade Maryland with no probable cause for
approximately 2 hours. My auto was searched and sniffed by the NSA CANINE UNIT. I was interrogated
about events from 1987 to the present involving my Whistleblowing activities, my litigation, my mental
health record and my intent on why I was traveling to Washington, D.C. I was commanded not to
continue on to Washington, D.C. And was commanded not to enter any federally owned property again. I
left the barracks and proceeded home to Lancaster, PA.
In July of 2005 at a military museum (Open to the Public) on a military base I was detained and
interrogated by two (2) Defense Intelligence Agents, or DIA of the Department of Defense in Austin, Texas
for about 1 hours for no probable cause. I was asked the same questions as above and was not allowed
to leave until the agents verified that I was staying with my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, who at the time
resided in Austin, Texas. I was commanded not to ever enter a military base again.
In January of 2006 I was detained and interrogated by Homeland Security in Houston Airport upon
the return from Puerto Vallarte, Mexico after being pulled from the line for allegedly having plastic
explosives in my back pack. Of course it was fabricated and I was allowed to leave.
The Courts must consider UNJUST ENRICHMENT in this case. (Wikipedia, The Free Dictionary by
FARLEX) - A general equitable principle that no person should be allowed to profit at another's expense
without making restitution for the reasonable value of any property, services, or other benefits that have
been unfairly received and retained. Although the unjust enrichment doctrine is sometimes referred to as
a quasi-contractual remedy, unjust enrichment is not based on an express contract. Instead, litigants
normally resort to the remedy of unjust enrichment when they have no written or verbal contract to
support their claim for relief. In such instances litigants ask a court to find a contractual relationship that
is implied in law, a fictitious relationship created by courts to do justice in a particular case.

Targeted Individuals - An Overview (Taken from the following website)


http://targetedindividual.blogspot.com/

Essentially, a targeted individual has officially been declared an "enemy of the State". Your
unrelenting harassment has now entered an entirely new phase. From what was once State and most
likely federal law enforcement surveillance (for whatever reason) has now graduated to a little-known
CIA / U.S. military psychological harassment & physical torture campaign that is so extensive and
seemingly so absurd to the average American citizen, you will almost certainly be labeled as having a
mental illness and/or paranoia just for simply describing what has now become your daily reality. The only
other people that truly understand the extent of the harassment & torture are fellow targeted individuals
who have also been experiencing similar violations of their civil, constitutional and basic human rights.

"I'm being followed everywhere I go", "it seems like they are everywhere", "it's like they can read
my mind and know where I'll be"...these are the types of statements, that while actually quite accurate
(keep reading), can easily make a targeted individual appear to have lost their mind. In order for it to
make more sense, let's once again review who is now orchestrating this abuse against a targeted
individual. Our military (essentially our international police force) and our intelligence community are in
control. This harassment campaign has reached the highest levels of our government and as such, the
resources at their disposable are truly unimaginable. Is it just the military perpetrating this harassment
campaign? Of course NOT! They have simply been handed control. What this means for a targeted
individual is that EVERY law enforcement tool available from your local community watch, community

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 25 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

organizations (ie Freemasons) and "concerned citizen" types all the way up through Homeland Security
including the U.S. military have placed YOU in their cross hairs. If you are a targeted individual your
conversations are being monitored (whether inside your home, your car, your office, and obviously your
telephone), your movements and actions are constantly being monitored (whether inside your home or
out in public), your electronic correspondence is being monitored (email, websites you visit, letters you
write on your computer, etc) - you are being WATCHED! 24/7/365. Again, this isn't your local Sheriff
sitting in an "unmarked" patrol car eating his donut on a stakeout. A targeted individual has every known
(AND classified) technology being deployed, and most likely TESTED, against them. Understand it and
deal with it in a logical and sensible manner. I don't mean to alarm you, but this is the unfortunate reality
that any targeted individual now finds them self in. Maybe it's a little clearer now HOW "they" can be
everywhere you go and seem to be able to "read your mind". Targeted individuals are not crazy - but be
very careful...the perception of mental illness is one of the many traps a program like this was designed to
create. If not the actual illness itself.

So, besides an absolute abomination of a targeted individuals right to privacy, what other tactics
are being deployed against a targeted individual. The hardest to prove and the most criminal tactic used
(especially when a target has 3 young & developing children in the home such as myself) is a continuous
poisoning and torture of the target by invisible directed electromagnetic radiation. If this is a new topic to
you, it may be unclear exactly what electromagnetic radiation (EMR) is. After all, it's not exactly the kind
of topic an average American is thinking about. Well, to name a few examples, electromagnetic radiation
ranges from radio frequency waves (RF) to the more destructive & potentially deadly ionizing forms of x-
rays and gamma rays. In the lower to mid spectrum there are also radar waves, microwaves, ultraviolet
and infrared light waves.

What I noticed when this harassment campaign began for myself toward the end of 2005 was the
continuous jet plane(s) that suddenly began flying "holding patterns" for extended periods of time above
& around my home. My theory is that these planes are equipped with sophisticated radar imaging
technology. Possibly very high powered infrared imaging cameras as well. Rather than using these
electromagnetic radiation devices to "search" for something, in the case of a targeted individual these
devices are used to slowly poison and "overload" the targeted individual with continuous high doses of
directed electromagnetic radiation. Once a targeted individuals body has been properly overexposed over
a period of time (months), other portable devices may then be used to keep a target in a constant state of
agitation and dis-ease. And for the more fragile among us, maybe even death! This tactic can be the
premier form of making a target seem crazy by forcing them to report what appear to be insane
accusations against neighbors, the people "following them everywhere", planes over their home and the
government. Another obvious reason for deploying this invisible & silent torture tactic is to provoke a
targeted individual to lash out in sheer frustration and anger against the closest person (who most likely
has absolutely nothing to do with the ongoing abuse). Essentially, this is the ultimate version of
entrapment. And may even be the ultimate, basically unprovable form of a state-sanctioned murder!

COINTELPRO
COINTELPRO (a portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of covert,
and at times illegal,[1][2] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organizations.[3]
FBI records show that COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI deemed
subversive,[4] including anti-Vietnam War organizers, activists of the Civil Rights Movement or Black
Power movement (e.g., Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Black Panther Party), feminist organizations, anti-
colonial movements (such as Puerto Rican independence groups like the Young Lords), and a variety of
organizations that were part of the broader New Left.

FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover issued directives governing COINTELPRO, ordering FBI agents to
"expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, neutralize or otherwise eliminate" the activities of these movements
and especially their leaders.[5][6] Under Hoover, the agent in charge of COINTELPRO was William C.
Sullivan.[7] Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy personally authorized some of these programs.[8]
Although Kennedy only gave written approval for limited wiretapping of King's phones "on a trial basis, for

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 26 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

a month or so",[9] Hoover extended the clearance so his men were "unshackled" to look for evidence in
any areas of King's life they deemed worthy.[10]

The History of COINTELPRO


Centralized operations under COINTELPRO officially began in August 1956 with a program designed
to "increase factionalism, cause disruption and win defections" inside the Communist Party U.S.A.
(CPUSA). Tactics included anonymous phone calls, IRS audits, and the creation of documents that would
divide the American communist organization internally.[11] An October 1956 memo from Hoover
reclassified the FBI's ongoing surveillance of black leaders, including it within COINTELPRO, with the
justification that the movement was infiltrated by communists.[12] In 1956, Hoover sent an open letter
denouncing Dr. T.R.M. Howard, a civil rights leader, surgeon, and wealthy entrepreneur in Mississippi who
had criticized FBI inaction in solving recent murders of George W. Lee, Emmett Till, and other blacks in
the South.[13] When the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) was founded in 1957, the FBI
began to monitor and target the group almost immediately, focusing particularly on Bayard Rustin,
Stanley Levison, and, eventually, Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.[14]

After the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, Hoover singled out King as a major
target for COINTELPRO. Under pressure from Hoover to focus on King, Sullivan wrote:

In the light of King's powerful demagogic speech. ... We must mark him now, if we have not done
so before, as the most dangerous Negro of the future in this nation from the standpoint of communism,
the Negro, and national security.[16]

Soon after, the FBI was systematically bugging King's home and his hotel rooms, as they now were
aware that King was growing in stature daily as the leader among leaders of the Negro movement.[17]

In the mid-1960s, King began publicly criticizing the Bureau for giving insufficient attention to the
use of terrorism by white supremacists. Hoover responded by publicly calling King the most "notorious
liar" in the United States.[18] In his 1991 memoir, Washington Post journalist Carl Rowan asserted that
the FBI had sent at least one anonymous letter to King encouraging him to commit suicide.[19] Historian
Taylor Branch documents an anonymous November 21, 1964 "suicide package" sent by the FBI that
contained audio recordings of King's sexual indiscretions combined with a letter telling him "There is only
one way out for you. You better take it before your filthy, abnormal, fraudulent self is bared to the nation."
And even by 1969, as has been noted elsewhere, "[FBI] efforts to 'expose' Martin Luther King, Jr. had not
slackened even though King had been dead for a year. [The Bureau] furnished ammunition to
conservatives to attack King's memory, and...tried to block efforts to honor the slain leader." [20]

During the same period the program also targeted Malcolm X. While an FBI spokesman has denied
that the FBI was "directly" involved in Malcolm's murder, it is documented that the Bureau worked to
"widen the rift" between Malcolm and Elijah Muhammad through infiltration and the "sparking of
acrimonious debates within the organization," rumor-mongering, and other tactics designed to foster
internal disputes; which ultimately led to Malcolm's assassination.[21][22] The FBI heavily infiltrated
Malcolm's Organization of Afro-American Unity in the final months of his life. The Pulitzer Prize-winning
biography of Malcolm X by Manning Marable asserts that most of the men who plotted Malcolm's
assassination were never apprehended and that the full extent of the FBI's involvement in his death
cannot be known.[23][24]

Amidst the urban unrest of JulyAugust 1967, the FBI began "COINTELPROBLACK HATE", which
focused on King and the SCLC as well as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), the
Revolutionary Action Movement (RAM), the Deacons for Defense and Justice, Congress of Racial Equality
(CORE), and the Nation of Islam.[25] BLACK HATE established the Ghetto Informant Program and
instructed 23 FBI offices to "disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize the activities of black
nationalist hate type organizations".[26]

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 27 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

A March 1968 memo stated the program's goal was to "prevent the coalition of militant black
nationalist groups" ; to "Prevent the RISE OF A 'MESSIAH' who could unify...the militant black nationalist
movement" ; "to pinpoint potential troublemakers and neutralize them before they exercise their potential
for violence [against authorities]." ; to "Prevent militant black nationalist groups and leaders from gaining
RESPECTABILITY, by discrediting them to...both the responsible community and to liberals who have
vestiges of sympathy..."; and to "prevent the long-range GROWTH of militant black organizations,
especially among youth." Dr. King was said to have potential to be the "messiah" figure, should he
abandon nonviolence and integrationism;[27] Stokely Carmichael was noted to have "the necessary
charisma to be a real threat in this way;" as he was seen as someone who espoused a much more militant
vision of "black power."[28]

This program coincided with a broader federal effort to prepare military responses for urban riots,
and began increased collaboration between the FBI, Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency,
and the Department of Defense. The CIA launched its own domestic espionage project in 1967 called
Operation CHAOS.[29] A particular target was the Poor People's Campaign, a national effort organized by
King and the SCLC to occupy Washington, D.C. The FBI monitored and disrupted the campaign on a
national level, while using targeted smear tactics locally to undermine support for the march.[30]

Overall, COINTELPRO encompassed disruption and sabotage of the Socialist Workers Party (1961),
the Ku Klux Klan (1964), the Nation of Islam, the Black Panther Party (1967), and the entire New Left
social/political movement, which included antiwar, community, and religious groups (1968). A later
investigation by the Senate's Church Committee (see below) stated that "COINTELPRO began in 1956, in
part because of frustration with Supreme Court rulings limiting the Government's power to proceed
overtly against dissident groups ..."[31] Official congressional committees and several court cases[32]
have concluded that COINTELPRO operations against communist and socialist groups exceeded statutory
limits on FBI activity and violated constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and association.[1]

The COINTELPRO Program Exposed

The building broken into by the Citizen's Commission to Investigate the FBI, at One Veterans
Square, Media, Pennsylvania

The program was successfully kept secret until 1971, when the Citizens' Commission to Investigate
the FBI burgled an FBI field office in Media, Pennsylvania, took several dossiers, and exposed the program
by passing this material to news agencies.[33] Many news organizations initially refused to publish the
information. Within the year, Director J. Edgar Hoover declared that the centralized COINTELPRO was over,
and that all future counterintelligence operations would be handled on a case-by-case basis.[34][35]

Additional documents were revealed in the course of separate lawsuits filed against the FBI by NBC
correspondent Carl Stern, the Socialist Workers Party, and a number of other groups. In 1976 the Select
Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities of the United States
Senate, commonly referred to as the "Church Committee" for its chairman, Senator Frank Church of
Idaho, launched a major investigation of the FBI and COINTELPRO. Journalists and historians speculate
that the government has not released many dossier and documents related to the program. Many
released documents have been partly, or entirely, redacted.

The Final Report of the Select Committee castigated conduct of the intelligence community in its
domestic operations (including COINTELPRO) in no uncertain terms:

The Committee finds that the domestic activities of the intelligence community at times violated
specific statutory prohibitions and infringed the constitutional rights of American citizens. The legal
questions involved in intelligence programs were often not considered. On other occasions, they were
intentionally disregarded in the belief that because the programs served the "national security" the law did
not apply. While intelligence officers on occasion failed to disclose to their superiors programs which were

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 28 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

illegal or of questionable legality, the Committee finds that the most serious breaches of duty were those
of senior officials, who were responsible for controlling intelligence activities and generally failed to assure
compliance with the law.[1] Many of the techniques used would be intolerable in a democratic society
even if all of the targets had been involved in violent activity, but COINTELPRO went far beyond that ...
the Bureau conducted a sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of
First Amendment rights of speech and association, on the theory that preventing the growth of dangerous
groups and the propagation of dangerous ideas would protect the national security and deter violence.
[31]

Range of targets
At its inception, the program's main target was the Communist Party.[36] According to the Church
Committee:

While the declared purposes of these programs were to protect the "national security" or prevent
violence, Bureau witnesses admit that many of the targets were nonviolent and most had no
connections with a foreign power. Indeed, nonviolent organizations and individuals were targeted
because the Bureau believed they represented a "potential" for violenceand nonviolent citizens
who were against the war in Vietnam were targeted because they gave "aid and comfort" to violent
demonstrators by lending respectability to their cause.
The imprecision of the targeting is demonstrated by the inability of the Bureau to define the
subjects of the programs. The Black Nationalist program, according to its supervisor, included "a
great number of organizations that you might not today characterize as black nationalist but which
were in fact primarily black." Thus, the nonviolent Southern Christian Leadership Conference was
labeled as a Black Nationalist-"Hate Group."
Furthermore, the actual targets were chosen from a far broader group than the titles of the
programs would imply. The CPUSA program targeted not only Communist Party members but also
sponsors of the National Committee to Abolish the House Un-American Activities Committee and
civil rights leaders allegedly under Communist influence or deemed to be not sufficiently "anti-
Communist". The Socialist Workers Party program included non-SWP sponsors of anti-war
demonstrations which were cosponsored by the SWP or the Young Socialist Alliance, its youth
group. The Black Nationalist program targeted a range of organizations from the Panthers to SNCC
to the peaceful Southern Christian Leadership Conference, and included every Black Student Union
and many other black student groups. New Left targets ranged from the SDS to the InterUniversity
Committee for Debate on Foreign Policy, from Antioch College ("vanguard of the New Left") to the
New Mexico Free University and other "alternate" schools, and from underground newspapers to
students' protesting university censorship of a student publication by carrying signs with four-letter
words on them.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 29 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Examples of surveillance, spanning all presidents from FDR to Nixon, both legal and illegal, contained in
the Church Committee report:[37]

President Roosevelt asked the FBI to put in its files the names of citizens sending telegrams to the
White House opposing his "national defense" policy and supporting Col. Charles Lindbergh.
President Truman received inside information on a former Roosevelt aide's efforts to influence his
appointments, labor union negotiating plans, and the publishing plans of journalists.
President Eisenhower received reports on purely political and social contacts with foreign officials
by Bernard Baruch, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas.
The Kennedy administration had the FBI wiretap a congressional staff member, three executive
officials, a lobbyist, and a Washington law firm. US Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy received
the fruits of an FBI wire tap on Martin Luther King, Jr. and an electronic listening device targeting a
congressman, both of which yielded information of a political nature.
President Johnson asked the FBI to conduct "name checks" of his critics and members of the staff
of his 1964 opponent, Senator Barry Goldwater. He also requested purely political intelligence on
his critics in the Senate, and received extensive intelligence reports on political activity at the 1964
Democratic Convention from FBI electronic surveillance.
President Nixon authorized a program of wiretaps which produced for the White House purely
political or personal information unrelated to national security, including information about a
Supreme Court Justice.

Groups that were known to be targets of COINTELPRO operations include

communist and socialist organizations


organizations and individuals associated with the Civil Rights Movement, including Rev. Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, the
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress of Racial Equality, and
other civil rights organizations
black nationalist groups
the Young Lords
the American Indian Movement
the white supremacist groups
the Ku Klux Klan
the National States' Rights Party
a broad range of organizations labeled "New Left", including Students for a Democratic Society and
the Weathermen
almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, as well as individual student demonstrators with no
group affiliation
the National Lawyers Guild
organizations and individuals associated with the women's rights movement
nationalist groups such as those seeking independence for Puerto Rico, United Ireland, and Cuban
exile movements including Orlando Bosch's Cuban Power and the Cuban Nationalist Movement;
2nd additional notable Americans.[38]
The COINTELPRO documents show numerous cases of the FBI's intentions to prevent and disrupt
protests against the Vietnam War. Many techniques were used to accomplish this task. "These included

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 30 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

promoting splits among antiwar forces, encouraging red-baiting of socialists, and pushing violent
confrontations as an alternative to massive, peaceful demonstrations." One 1966 COINTELPRO operation
tried to redirect the Socialist Workers Party from their pledge of support for the antiwar movement.[39]

Methods

Body of Fred Hampton, national spokesman for the Black Panther Party, who was
murdered[40][41] by members of the Chicago Police Department, as part of a
COINTELPRO operation.[42][43]

According to attorney Brian Glick in his book War at Home, the FBI used four main methods during
COINTELPRO:

Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main purpose
was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and scare off potential
supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine activists as agents.
Psychological warfare: The FBI and police used myriad "dirty tricks" to undermine progressive
movements. They planted false media stories and published bogus leaflets and other publications
in the name of targeted groups. They forged correspondence, sent anonymous letters, and made
anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation about meetings and events, set up pseudo
movement groups run by government agents, and manipulated or strong-armed parents,
employers, landlords, school officials and others to cause trouble for activists. They used bad-
jacketing to create suspicion about targeted activists, sometimes with lethal consequences.[44]
Harassment via the legal system: The FBI and police abused the legal system to harass
dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave perjured testimony and
presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful imprisonment. They
discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government regulations and used conspicuous
surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand jury subpoenas in an effort to intimidate activists
and silence their supporters.[42][45]
Illegal force: The FBI conspired with local police departments to threaten dissidents; to conduct
illegal break-ins in order to search dissident homes; and to commit vandalism, assaults, beatings
and assassinations.[42] The object was to frighten or eliminate dissidents and disrupt their
movements.

The FBI specifically developed tactics intended to heighten tension and hostility between various
factions in the black militancy movement, for example between the Black Panthers, the US Organization,
and the Blackstone Rangers. This resulted in numerous deaths, among which were San Diego Black
Panther Party members John Huggins, Bunchy Carter and Sylvester Bell.[42]

Dhoruba Bin Wahad a former Black Panther, reflects on how these tactics made him feel, saying he
had a combat mentality and felt like he was at war with the government. When asked about why he
thinks the Black Panthers were targeted he said, "In the United States, the equivalent of the military was
the local police. During the early sixties, at the height of the Civil Rights Movement, and the human rights
movement, the police in the United States became increasingly militaristic. They began to train out of
military bases in the United States. The Law Enforcement Assistance Act (LEAA) supplied local police with
military technology, everything from assault rifles to army personnel carriers. In his opinion, the
Counterintelligence Program went hand-in-hand with the militarization of the police in the Black
community, with the militarization of police in America."[46]

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 31 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

The FBI also conspired with the police departments of many U.S. cities (San Diego, Los Angeles, San
Francisco, Oakland, Philadelphia, Chicago) to encourage repeated raids on Black Panther homesoften
with little or no evidence of violations of federal, state, or local lawswhich resulted directly in the police
killing many members of the Black Panther Party, most notably Chicago Black Panther Party Chairman
Fred Hampton on December 4, 1969.[42][43][47]

In order to eliminate black militant leaders whom they considered dangerous, the FBI is believed to
have worked with local police departments to target specific individuals,[48] accuse them of crimes they
did not commit, suppress exculpatory evidence and falsely incarcerate them. Elmer "Geronimo" Pratt, a
Black Panther Party leader, was incarcerated for 27 years before a California Superior Court vacated his
murder conviction, ultimately freeing him. Appearing before the court, an FBI agent testified that he
believed Pratt had been framed, because both the FBI and the Los Angeles Police Department knew he
had not been in the area at the time the murder occurred.[49][50]

Some sources claim that the FBI conducted more than 200 "black bag jobs",[51][52] which were
warrantless surreptitious entries, against the targeted groups and their members.[53]

J. Edgar Hoover

In 1969 the FBI special agent in San Francisco wrote Hoover that his investigation of the Black
Panther Party (BPP) had concluded that in his city, at least, the Panthers were primarily engaged in
feeding breakfast to children. Hoover fired back a memo implying the agent's career goals would be
directly affected by his supplying evidence to support Hoover's view that the BPP was "a violence-prone
organization seeking to overthrow the Government by revolutionary means".[54]

Hoover supported using false claims to attack his political enemies. In one memo he wrote:
"Purpose of counterintelligence action is to disrupt the BPP and it is immaterial whether facts exist to
substantiate the charge."[55]

In one particularly controversial 1965 incident, white civil rights worker Viola Liuzzo was murdered
by Ku Klux Klansmen, who gave chase and fired shots into her car after noticing that her passenger was a
young black man; one of the Klansmen was Gary Thomas Rowe, an acknowledged FBI informant.[56][57]
The FBI spread rumors that Liuzzo was a member of the Communist Party and had abandoned her
children to have sexual relationships with African Americans involved in the Civil Rights Movement.[58]
[59] FBI records show that J. Edgar Hoover personally communicated these insinuations to President
Johnson.[60][61] FBI informant Rowe has also been implicated in some of the most violent crimes of the
1960s civil rights era, including attacks on the Freedom Riders and the 1963 Birmingham, Alabama 16th
Street Baptist Church bombing.[56] According to Noam Chomsky, in another instance in San Diego, the
FBI financed, armed, and controlled an extreme right-wing group of former Minutemen, transforming it
into a group called the Secret Army Organization that targeted groups, activists, and leaders involved in
the Anti-War Movement, using both intimidation and violent acts.[62][63][64]

Hoover ordered preemptive action "to pinpoint potential troublemakers and neutralize them before
they exercise their potential for violence."[5]

Illegal surveillance

The final report of the Church Committee concluded:

Too many people have been spied upon by too many Government agencies and too much
information has been illegally collected. The Government has often undertaken the secret
surveillance of citizens on the basis of their political beliefs, even when those beliefs posed no
threat of violence or illegal acts on behalf of a hostile foreign power. The Government, operating
primarily through secret and biased informants, but also using other intrusive techniques such as

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 32 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

wiretaps, microphone "bugs", surreptitious mail opening, and break-ins, has swept in vast amounts
of information about the personal lives, views, and associations of American citizens. Investigations
of groups deemed potentially dangerousand even of groups suspected of associating with
potentially dangerous organizationshave continued for decades, despite the fact that those
groups did not engage in unlawful activity.

Groups and individuals have been assaulted, repressed, harassed and disrupted because of their
political views, social beliefs and their lifestyles. Investigations have been based upon vague
standards whose breadth made excessive collection inevitable. Unsavory, harmful and vicious
tactics have been employedincluding anonymous attempts to break up marriages, disrupt
meetings, ostracize persons from their professions, and provoke target groups into rivalries that
might result in deaths. Intelligence agencies have served the political and personal objectives of
presidents and other high officials. While the agencies often committed excesses in response to
pressure from high officials in the Executive branch and Congress, they also occasionally initiated
improper activities and then concealed them from officials whom they had a duty to inform.

Governmental officialsincluding those whose principal duty is to enforce the lawhave violated or
ignored the law over long periods of time and have advocated and defended their right to break
the law.

The Constitutional system of checks and balances has not adequately controlled intelligence
activities. Until recently the Executive branch has neither delineated the scope of permissible
activities nor established procedures for supervising intelligence agencies. Congress has failed to
exercise sufficient oversight, seldom questioning the use to which its appropriations were being
put. Most domestic intelligence issues have not reached the courts, and in those cases when they
have reached the courts, the judiciary has been reluctant to grapple with them.[65][66]

Post-COINTELPRO operations

While COINTELPRO was officially terminated in April 1971, critics allege that continuing FBI actions
indicate that post-COINTELPRO reforms did not succeed in ending COINTELPRO tactics.[67][68][69]
Documents released under the FOIA show that the FBI tracked the late David Halberstama Pulitzer
Prize-winning journalist and authorfor more than two decades.[70] "Counterterrorism" guidelines
implemented during the Reagan administration have been described as allowing a return to COINTELPRO
tactics.[71][pages needed] Some radical groups accuse factional opponents of being FBI informants or
assume the FBI is infiltrating the movement.[72]

The IG report found these "troubling" FBI practices between 2001 and 2006. In some cases, the
FBI conducted investigations of people affiliated with activist groups for "factually weak" reasons. Also,
the FBI extended investigations of some of the groups "without adequate basis" and improperly kept
information about activist groups in its files. The IG report also found that FBI Director Robert Mueller III
provided inaccurate congressional testimony about one of the investigations, but this inaccuracy may have
been due to his relying on what FBI officials told him.[73]

Several authors have accused the FBI of continuing to deploy COINTELPRO-like tactics against
radical groups after the official COINTELPRO operations were ended. Several authors have suggested the
American Indian Movement (AIM) has been a target of these operations.

Authors such as Ward Churchill, Rex Weyler, and Peter Matthiessen allege that the federal
government intended to acquire uranium deposits on the Lakota tribe's reservation land, and that this
motivated a larger government conspiracy against AIM activists on the Pine Ridge reservation.[74][75]
[76][77][78] Others believe COINTELPRO continues and similar actions are being taken against activist
groups.[78][79][80] Caroline Woidat says that, with respect to Native Americans, COINTELPRO should be
understood within a historical context in which "Native Americans have been viewed and have viewed the

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 33 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

world themselves through the lens of conspiracy theory."[81] Other authors argue that while some
conspiracy theories related to COINTELPRO are unfounded, the issue of ongoing government surveillance
and repression is real.[82][83]

References

2. "I. Introduction and Summary" (PDF). Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans - Church
Committee final report. United States Senate website. II. United States Government. 1976-04-26.
p. 10. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-04-18. Retrieved 2014-07-15.
Wolf, Paul. "COINTELPRO: The Untold American Story". Archive.org. World Conference Against
Racism, Durbin SA.
Jalon, Allan M. (2006-03-08). "A break-in to end all break-ins; In 1971, stolen FBI files exposed
the government's domestic spying program.". Los Angeles Times. Tribune Company. Archived from
the original on 2013-12-03. Retrieved 2014-07-15.
Jeffreys-Jones, Rhodri (208). The FBI. Yale University Press. p. 189. ISBN 9780300142846.
COINTELPRO Revisited - Spying & Disruption - IN BLACK AND WHITE: THE F.B.I. PAPERS
"A Huey P. Newton Story - Actions - COINTELPRO". PBS. Archived from the original on 2010-11-
18. Retrieved 2008-06-23.
Weiner, Tim (2012). Enemies : A History of the FBI (1st ed.). New York: Random House.
ISBN 9781400067480., p. 196. "Sullivan would become Hoover's field marshal in matters of
national security, chief of FBI intelligence, and commandant of COINTELPRO. In that top secret and
tightly compartmentalized world, an FBI inside of the FBI, Sullivan served as the executor of
Hoover's most clandestine and recondite demands."
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 233. "RFK knew much more about this surveillance than he ever
admitted. He personally renewed his authorization for the taps on Levison's office, and he
approved Hoover's request to tap Levison's home telephone, where King called late at night several
times a week."

Herst, Burton (2007) Bobby and J. Edgar, p. 372.


Herst (2007), pp. 372374
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 195
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 198. "On October 2, 1956, Hoover stepped up the FBI's long-standing
surveillance of black civil rights activists. He sent a COINTELPRO memo to the field, warning that
the Communist Party was seeking to infiltrate the movement."
David T. Beito and Linda Royster Beito, Black Maverick: T.R.M. Howard's Fight for Civil Rights and
Economic Power (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2009), 148, 15459.
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 200.
Gage, Beverly (2014-11-11). "What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals". The New York
Times. Retrieved 2015-01-09.
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 235.
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 236. "The bugs got quick results. When King traveled, as he did
constantly in the ensuing weeks, to Washington, Milwaukee, Los Angeles, and Honolulu, the Bureau
planted hidden microphones in his hotel rooms. The FBI placed a total of eight wiretaps and
sixteen bugs on King."
Taylor Branch, Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963-1965 (Simon & Schuster, 1999), p.
524-529
Adams, Cecil M. (2003-05-02). "Was Martin Luther King, Jr. a plagiarist?". Washington Post.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 34 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Retrieved 2006-06-06.
Taylor Branch, Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963-1965 (Simon & Schuster, 1999) p.
527-529
Taylor Branch, Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963-1965 (Simon & Schuster, 1999), p.
243
Gregory Kane, "FBI should acknowledge complicity in the assassination of Malcolm X" The
Baltimore Sun, May 14, 2000
Toure "Malcolm X: Criminal, Minister, Humanist, Martyr" The New York Times, June 17, 2011
James W. Douglass "The Converging Martyrdom of Malcolm and Martin" Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.
Lecture, Princeton Theological Seminary, March 29, 2006
"Guide to the Microfilm Edition of FBI Surveillance Files: Black Extremist Organizations, Part 1"
Lexis-Nexis
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 271.
"The FBI Sets Goals for COINTELPRO" American Social History Project, City University of New York
Rob Warden "Hoover Rated Carmichael As 'Black Messiah'" Chicago Daily News, Feb 10, 1976
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 272. "Some 1,500 army intelligence officers in civilian clothing
undertook the surveillance of some 100,000 American citizens. Army intelligence shared all their
reports over the next three years. The CIA tracked antiwar leaders and black militants who
traveled overseas, and it reported back to the FBI. The FBI, in turn, shared thousands of selected
files on Americans with army intelligence and the CIA. All three intelligence services sent the
names of Americans to the National Security Agency for inclusion on a global watch list; the NSA
relayed back to the FBI hundreds of transcripts of intercepted telephone calls to and from suspect
Americans."
McKnight, Last Crusade, pp. 2628. "By March the Hoover Bureau's campaign against King was
virtually on a total war footing. In a March 21 'urgent' teletype, Hoover urged all field offices
involved in the POCAM project to exploit every tactic in the bureau's arsenal of covert political
warfare to bring down King and the SCLC."
"Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans".
United States Senate. Retrieved 2010-12-01.
See, for example, Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 (1984); Rugiero v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, 257 F.3d
534, 546 (2001).[dead link]
http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/1971/
"A Short History of FBI COINTELPRO", Albion Monitor, Retrieved July 13, 2007. Archived
September 28, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.

Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 293


The COINTELPRO Papers - Documents from the FBI's Secret Wars Against Dissent in the United
States by Ward Churchill & Jim Vander Wall. South End Press.
Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans, Final Report of the Senate Committee to Study
Governmental Operations with respect to Intelligence Activities
Various Church Committee reports reproduced online at ICDC: Final Report, 2A; Final Report,2Cb;
Final Report, 3A; Final Report, 3G. Various COINTELPRO documents reproduced online at ICDC:
CPUSA; SWP; Black Nationalist; White Hate; New Left; Puerto Rico. Archived January 13, 2013, at
the Wayback Machine.
Blackstock, Nelson. COINTELPRO: The FBI's Secret War on Political Freedom, Pathfinder, New York.
1975. p. 111.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 35 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Michael Newton. Famous Assassinations in World History: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO, p. 205.


ISBN 1610692853
THE CHICAGO CRIME SCENES PROJECT: FRED HAMPTON
The FBI'S Covert Action Program to Destroy the Black Panther Party
FBI Secrets: An Agent's Expose. M. Wesley Swearingen. Boston. South End Press. 1995. Special
Agent Gregg York: "We expected about twenty Panthers to be in the apartment when the police
raided the place. Only two of those black nigger fuckers were killed, Fred Hampton and Mark
Clark."
Ward Churchill (2002), Agents of Repression (Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars Against
the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement ed.), South End Press, ISBN 978-
0896086463, OCLC 50985124, 0896086461
"Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to
Intelligence Activities-Book III" [The Church Report], US Senate, 1976
Bin Wahad, Dhoruba. Still Black, Still Strong. Semiotext, 1993, pp. 18-19
Brown, Elaine. A Taste of Power: A Black Woman's Story. New York: Doubleday, 1992, pp. 204-06
Paul Wolf, "COINTELPRO", ICDC
"Former Black Panther freed after 27 years in jail". CNN. Archived from the original on 2010-11-
18. Retrieved April 30, 2010.
In re Pratt, 82 Cal

Alexander Cockburn; Jeffrey St. Clair (1998). Whiteout: The CIA, Drugs and the Press. Verso.
p. 69. ISBN 978-1-85984-139-6.
FBI document, 19 July 1966, DeLoach to Sullivan re: "Black Bag" Jobs.

[1]
FBI document, 27 May 1969, "Director FBI to SAC San Francisco", available at the FBI reading
room.

FBI document, 16 September 1970, Director FBI to SAC's in Baltimore, Detroit, Los Angeles, New
Haven, San Francisco, and Washington Field Office. Available at the FBI reading room.
Gary May, The Informant: The FBI, the Ku Klux Klan, and the Murder of Viola Luzzo, Yale University
Press, 2005.
"Jonathan Yardley". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2010-11-18. Retrieved
April 30, 2010.
Joanne Giannino. "Viola Liuzzo". Dictionary of Unitarian & Universalist Biography. Archived from
the original on 2010-11-18. Retrieved 2008-09-29.
Kay Houston. "The Detroit housewife who moved a nation toward racial justice". The Detroit News,
Rearview Mirror. Archived from the original on 1999-04-27.
"Uncommon Courage: The Viola Liuzzo Story". Archived from the original on 2007-08-13.
Mary Stanton (2000). From Selma to Sorrow: The Life and Death of Viola Liuzzo. University of
Georgia Press. p. 190.
Noam Chomsky, "Triumphs of Democracy", Excerpted from Language and Responsibility
Watergate and the Secret Army Organization - msg#00404 - culture.discuss.cia-drugs
1972
"Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans Book II, Final Report of the Select Committee

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 36 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

to Study Governmental Operations with respect to Intelligence Activities United States Senate
(Church Committee)". United States Senate. Retrieved May 11, 2006.
"Tapped Out Why Congress won't get through to the NSA.". Slate. Retrieved May 11, 2006.
David Cunningham. There's Something Happening Here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI.
University of California Press, 2005: "However, strong suspicions lingered that the program's
tactics were sustained on a less formal basissuspicions sometimes furthered by agents
themselves, who periodically claimed that counterintelligence activities were continuing, though in
a manner undocumented within Bureau files."; Hobson v. Brennan, 646 F.Supp. 884 (D.D.C.,1986)
Bud Schultz, Ruth Schultz. The Price of Dissent: Testimonies to Political Repression in America.
University of California Press, 2001: "Although the FBI officially discontinued COINTELPRO
immediately after the Pennsylvania disclosures "for security reasons," when pressed by the Senate
committee, the bureau acknowledged two new instances of "Cointelpro-type" operations. The
committee was left to discover a third, apparently illegal operation on its own."
Athan G. Theoharis, et al. The FBI: A Comprehensive Reference Guide. Greenwood Publishing
Group, 1999: "More recent controversies have focused on the adequacy of recent restrictions on
the Bureau's domestic intelligence operations. Disclosures of the 1970s that FBI agents continued
to conduct break-ins, and of the 1980s that the FBI targeted CISPES, again brought forth
accusations of FBI abuses of powerand raised questions of whether reforms of the 1970s had
successfully exorcised the ghost of FBI Director Hoover."
The Associated Press, "FBI tracked journalist for over 20 years". Toronto Star. November 7, 2008.
Retrieved November 23, 2008.
Bud Schultz, Ruth Schultz. The Price of Dissent: Testimonies to Political Repression in America.
University of California Press, 2001: "The problem persists after Hoover."The record before this
court," Federal Magistrate Joan Lefkow stated in 1991, "shows that despite regulations, orders and
consent decrees prohibiting such activities, the FBI had continued to collect information concerning
only the exercise of free speech."
Mike Mosedale, "Bury My Heart," City Pages, Volume 21 - Issue 1002, 16 February 2000
"FBI Probes of Groups Were Improper, Justice Department Says". The San Jose Mercury News.
September 20, 2010. also reported at democracynow.org, 21 September 2010
Churchill, Ward, and Jim Vander Wall, (1990), The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from the FBI's
Secret Wars Against Domestic Dissent, Boston: South End Press, pp. xii, 303.
Churchill, Ward; and James Vander Wall. Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars against the
Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement, 1988, Boston, South End Press.
Weyler, Rex. Blood of the Land: The Government and Corporate War Against First Nations.
Matthiessen, Peter, In the Spirit of Crazy Horse, 1980, Viking.
Woidat, Caroline M. "The Truth Is on the Reservation: American Indians and Conspiracy Culture",
The Journal of American Culture 29 (4), 2006, pp. 454467
McQuinn, Jason. "Conspiracy Theory vs Alternative Journalism", Alternative Press Review, Vol. 2,
No. 3, Winter 1996
Horowitz, David. "Johnnie's Other O.J.", Front Page Magazine.com, September 1, 1997.
Woidat, Caroline M. "The Truth Is on the Reservation: American Indians and Conspiracy Culture",
The Journal of American Culture 29 (4), 2006. pp. 454467
Berlet, Chip. "The X-Files Movie: Facilitating Fanciful Fun, or Fueling Fear and Fascism? Conspiracy
Theories for Fun, Not for False Prophets", 1998, Political Research Associates
Berlet, Chip; and Matthew N. Lyons. 1998, "One key to litigating against government prosecution
of dissidents: Understanding the underlying assumptions", Parts 1 and 2, Police Misconduct and

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 37 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Civil Rights Law Report (West Group), 5 (13), (JanuaryFebruary): 145153; and 5 (14), (March
April): 157162.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 38 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

CIA Mind Control Experiments


Declassified Documents Reveal Sex Abuse, and More

Taken from the website:


(http://www.wanttoknow.info/mind_control/cia_mind_control_experiments_sex_abuse)

Tragic, heartbreaking mass murders in recent years have spread fear and panic among the general
public. Yet some are questioning if there isn't more than meets the eye with these cruel and bizarre
events. Is it conceivable that there might be a deeper agenda here?

This essay presents undeniable evidence that secret government mind control programs
have created assassins out of unsuspecting citizens.

The astonishing excerpts below, taken verbatim from declassified CIA documents, reveal detailed
mind control experiments in highly secret, government-sponsored experiments. Through hypnosis, drugs,
and electric shock, CIA clinicians fractured personalities and induced multiple personality disorder (MPD)
also called dissociative identity disorder (DID).

These top secret experiments were successful in creating Manchurian Candidates or


super spies programmed to carry out assassination, terrorist acts, sexual favors, and more
without conscious knowledge of what they were doing. The army of Manchurian Candidates created
may have played a key, hidden role in world politics.

To verify this startling information, links are provided to scanned images of the original CIA
documents. Instructions are also available here to order any of these documents directly from the CIA
using the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

Though dating from the 1950s and 60s, these revealing documents were not released for decades
for reasons of "national security." The U.S. government claims mind control experiments are no longer
being carried out, yet how can we know? The existence of these programs was denied for decades, and
certainly any recent documents would be classified secret under the rubric of "national security."

A trusted CIA informant I know assures me that these programs are ongoing. These disturbing
methods are used by various countries in clandestine operations around the world. Many might prefer not
to look at these ugly wounds to the soul of our nation and world. Yet if we avoid or ignore them, they are
likely to grow and fester.

CIA document and page number: 190684, pp. 1, 4


Title: Outline of Special H Cases
Date: 7 January 1953
Page 1, Page 4

In a general request for volunteers [deleted names] volunteered for H [hypnosis] experimentation and
were originally tested on 21 May 1951. Both girls, at this time, were nineteen years of age. These
subjects have clearly demonstrated that they can pass from a fully awake state to a deep H controlled
state via the telephone, via some very subtle signal that cannot be detected by other persons in the room,
and without the other individuals being able to note the change.

It has been shown clearly that physically individuals can be induced into H by telephone, by receiving
written matter, or by the use of code, signal, or words. Control of those hypnotized can be passed
from one individual to another without great difficulty. It has also been shown by
experimentation with these girls that they can act as unwilling couriers for information
purposes, and that they can be conditioned to a point where they believe a change in identity on their
part even on the polygraph.

Note: This document shows that CIA experimenters were successful in hypnotizing young women (19

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 39 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

years old in this case) to do things they would not do normally without any memory afterward, sometimes
even unwillingly. Though they volunteered, these women were thus programmed to be Manchurian
Candidates or super spies with no knowledge of what these men were doing to them.

CIA document and page number: 17395, p. 18


Title: ESP Research
Date: Unknown
Link to view image of original: Click here

Learning models will be instituted in which the subject will be rewarded or punished for his overall
performance and reinforced in various ways by being told whether he was right, by being told what the
target was, with electric shock etc. ... In other cases drugs and psychological tricks will be used
to modify his attitudes. The experimenters will be particularly interested in disassociative states, from
the abaissement de niveau mental to multiple personality in so-called mediums, and an attempt will be
made to induce a number of states of this kind, using hypnosis.

Note: This document provides proof that the CIA was was using drugs and electric shock in attempting to
induce MPD (multiple personality disorder). Though this document uses the masculine "he" to describe the
subject, other documents show that most of the subjects used were young women who volunteered. The
subjects were not informed about the deeper aspects and implications for which they were being trained.
If you view the original, you will also find interesting information on ESP experiments.

CIA document and page number: 190691, p. 1, 2


Title: Hypnotic Experimentation and Research
Date: 10 February 1954
Link to view image of original: Page 1, Page 2

A posthypnotic of the night before (pointed finger, you will sleep) was enacted. Misses [deleted] and
[deleted] immediately progressed to a deep hypnotic state with no further suggestion. Miss [deleted]
was then instructed (having previously expressed a fear of firearms in any fashion) that she
would use every method at her disposal to awaken miss [deleted] (now in a deep hypnotic
sleep), and failing this, she would pick up a pistol nearby and fire it at Miss [deleted]. She was
instructed that her rage would be so great that she would not hesitate to "kill" [deleted] for
failing to awaken.

Miss [deleted] carried out these suggestions to the letter including firing the (unloaded pneumatic pistol)
gun at [deleted] and then proceeding to fall into a deep sleep. After proper suggestions were made, both
were awakened and expressed complete amnesia for the entire sequence. Miss [deleted] was again
handed the gun, which she refused (in an awakened state) to pick up or accept form the operator. She
expressed absolute denial that the foregoing sequence had happened.

Miss [deleted] felt reluctant about participating further since she expressed her doubt as to any
useful purpose in further attendance. The Operator thereupon proceeded in full view of all other subjects
to explain to Miss [deleted] that he planned to induce a deep state of hypnosis now. The reaction was as
had been expected. Miss [deleted] excused herself to make a telephone call (defense mechanism?). Upon
her return a very positive approach was adopted by the operator whereupon a deeper, much deeper state
of hypnosis was obtained.

Immediately a posthypnotic was induced that when the operator accidently dropped a steel ball in his
hand to the floor ... Miss [deleted] would again go into hypnosis. Miss [deleted] then advised that she
must conclude her work for the evening. She arose to adjust her hair before the mirror. The ball was
dropped and she promptly slumped back into the chair and back into hypnosis. It is the opinion of the
operator the Miss [deleted] if properly trained (positive approach) will continue to improve.

Note: Here we have proof that these women could be converted into unsuspecting and even unwilling
assassins. They could be programmed to assassinate anyone and would do so without any conscious

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 40 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

knowledge afterward. Note also the questionable status of "volunteer" implied. Though these women
originally volunteered, unwillingness to continue could be manipulated by the men running the program.

CIA document and page number: 190527, pp. 1, 2


Title: SI and H Experimentation
Date: 25 September 1951
Link to view images of original: Page 1, Page 2
Note: SI stands for sleep induction and H for hypnosis

Prior to actually beginning the more complex experiments, several simple post H were worked with
both of the girls participating. The first major experiment of the evening was set up as follows
without previous explanation to either [deleted] or [deleted]. Both subjects were placed in a very
deep trance state and while in this state, the following instructions were given:

(A) [Deleted] was instructed that when she awakened, she was to procede to [deleted] room. She was
told that while there, she would receive a telephone call from an individual whom she would know only as
"Joe". This individual would engage her in a normal telephone conversation. During this conversation,
this individual would give her a code word and upon mentioning the code word, [deleted]
would go into a deep SI [sleep induction] trance state, but would be "normal" in appearance
with her eyes open.

[Deleted] was then told that upon the conclusion of the telephone conversation, she would procede to the
ladies room where she would meet a girl who was unknown to her. She was told that she would strike up
a conversation with this girl and during the conversation she would mention the code word "New York" to
this other girl, who, in turn, would give her a device and further instructions which were to be carried out
by [deleted]. She was told that after she carried out the instructions, she was to return to the Operations
Room, sit in the sofa and go immediately into a deep sleep.

(B) [Deleted] was instructed that upon awakening, she would proceed to [deleted] room where she would
wait at the desk for a telephone call. Upon receiving the call, a person known as "Jim" would engage her
in normal conversation. During the course of the conversation, this individual would mention a code word
to [deleted]. When she heard this code word, she would pass into a SI trance state, but would not close
her eyes and remain perfectly normal and continue the telephone conversation. She was told that upon
conclusion of the telephone conversation, she would then carry out the following instructions:

[Deleted] being in a complete SI state at this time, was then told to open her eyes and was shown an
electric timing device. She was informed that this timing device was an incendiary bomb and was
then instructed how to attach and set the device. After [deleted] had indicated that she had learned
how to set and attach the device, she was told to return to a sleep state and further instructed that upon
concluding the aforementioned conversation, she would take the timing device which was in a briefcase
and proceed to the ladies room.

In the ladies room, she would be met by a girl whom she had never seen who would identify herself by
the code word "New York." [Deleted] was then to show this individual how to attach and set the
timing device and further instructions would be given the individual by [deleted] that the
timing device was to be carried in the briefcase to [deleted] room, placed in the nearest empty
electric-light plug and concealed in the bottom, left-hand drawer of [deleted] desk, with the
device set for 82 seconds and turned on.

[Deleted] was further instructed to tell this other girl that as soon as the device had been set and turned

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 41 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

on, she was to take the briefcase, leave [deleted] room, go to the operations room and go to the sofa and
enter a deep sleep state. [Deleted] was further instructed that after completion of instructing the other
girl and the transferring to the other girl of the incendiary bomb, she was to return at once to the
operations room, sit on the sofa, and go into a deep sleep state.

For a matter of record, immediately after the operation was begun it was noted that a member of the
charforce was cleaning the floor in the ladies room and subsequently, both [deleted] and [deleted] had to
be placed ... once again in a trance state and instructions changed from the ladies room to Room 3. It
should be noted that even with the change of locale in the transfer point, the experiment was carried off
perfectly without any difficulty or hesitation on the part of either of the girls. Each girl acted out their part
perfectly, the device was planted and set as directed and both girls returned to the operations room, sat
on the sofa and entered a deep sleep state. Throughout, their movements were easy and natural.

Note: You will note the frequent use of "girls" (young women) in these programs. Do you think the men
in charge, having complete hypnotic control of these women, might have at times taken advantage of
them sexually? Yet this would never enter the official documentation, with the one major exception below.

CIA document and page number: 140393, p. 1


Title: [Deleted]
Date: 9 July 1951
Link to view image of original: Click here

On 2 July 1951 approximately 1:00 p.m. the instruction began with [deleted] relating to the student
some of his sexual experiences. [Deleted] stated that he had constantly used hypnotism as a
means of inducing young girls to engage in sexual intercourse with him. [Deleted], a
performer in [deleted] orchestra, was forced to engage in sexual intercourse with [deleted] while
under the influence of hypnotism. [Deleted] stated that he first put her into a hypnotic trance and
then suggested to her that he was her husband and that she desired sexual intercourse with him.

Note: This document shows that an instructor being used by the CIA took advantage of his skill in
hypnosis to sexually abuse young women without their having any knowledge of being abused. How
many CIA hypnotists did likewise? Do you think a man involved in these programs might take
advantage of a beautiful, young woman knowing she would not remember afterward?
Note that for some reason this document is not available in the CIA's three CD set and must be
ordered individually at this link. See the What You Can Do section at the end of this page for
suggestions on how we can stop this abuse.

CIA document and page number: 17441, p.8


Title: Continuation of Studies of Hypnosis and Suggestibility
Date: Unknown
Link to view image of original: Click here

Preliminary clinical research during 1955-56 has yielded promising leads in terms of
knowledge of how hypnotizability can be influenced by pharmacological means.
Experiments involving altered personality function as a result of environmental manipulation (chiefly
sensory isolation) have yielded promising leads in terms of suggestibility and the production of
trance-like states. There is reason to believe that environmental manipulations can affect
tendencies for dissociative phenomenon to occur.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 42 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Note: "Dissociative phenomenon" refers to the ability of a person's consciousness to leave and a
new consciousness enter, thereby facilitation the creation of "alter" or multiple personalities.
Besides hypnosis, drugs and electric shocks were developed as means to facilitate the creation of
Manchurian Candidates.

CIA document and page number:17748, pp. 1, 2, 4, 6-9


Title: Report of Inspection of MKULTRA
Date: 26 July 1963
Link to view images of original: Page 1, Page 2, Page 4, Page 6, Page 7, Page 8, Page 9.

It was deemed advisable to prepare the report of the MKULTRA program in one copy only, in view of
its unusual sensitivity. The MKULTRA activity is concerned with the research and development of
chemical, biological, and radiological materials capable of employment in clandestine operation to
control human behavior. MKULTRA was authorized by then Director of Central Intelligence [DCI],
Allen W. Dulles, in 1953.

The concepts involved in manipulating human behavior are found by many people both within and outside
the Agency to be distasteful and unethical. Nevertheless, there have been major accomplishments both in
research and operational employment. Some MKULTRA activities raise questions of legality implicit in the
original charter. A final phase of testing of MKULTRA products places the rights and interests of
U.S. citizens in jeopardy. Public disclosure of some aspects of MKULTRA activity could induce
serious adverse reaction in U.S. public opinion. The DCI's memorandum ... exempted MKULTRA from
audit.

Over the ten-year life of the program many additional avenues to the control of human behavior have
been designated by the TSD management [Technical Services Division - under which MKULTRA operated]
as appropriate to investigation under the MKULTRA charter, including radiation, electro-shock, various
fields of psychology, psychiatry, sociology, and anthropology, graphology, harassment substances, and
paramilitary devices and materials.

TSD initiated a program for covert testing of materials on unwitting U.S. citizens in 1955. TSD has
pursued a philosophy of minimum documentation in keeping with the high sensitivity of some of the
projects. The lack of consistent records precluded use of routine inspection procedures and raised a
variety of questions concerning management and fiscal controls.

There are just two individuals in TSD who have full substantive knowledge of the program and
most of that knowledge is unrecorded. In protecting both the sensitive nature of the American
intelligence capability to manipulate human behavior, they apply "need to know" doctrine to
their professional associates and to their clerical assistants to a maximum degree.

Note: Why did only two people have full substantive knowledge of the program? Could it be that sex
abuse and political manipulations behind the scenes were so severe that no one was to be trusted? Do
you think we could trust those two individuals? CIA Director Richard Helms, upon hearing there would be
a Congressional investigation, ordered the destruction of all documents from these unethical and at times
illegal mind control programs in 1973. He did not realize, however, that incriminating evidence remained
in the financial files of the agency, which are what you read here. We can only imagine what secrets the
destroyed documents held.

CIA document and page number: 87624, p. 3, 4 (also appended to 17748, p. 32, 33)
Title: Two Extremely Sensitive Research Programs
Date: 3 April 1953
Link to view images of original: Page 3, Page 4

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 43 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Approximately 6% of the projects are of such an ultra-sensitive nature that they cannot and should
not be handled by means of contracts which would associate CIA or the Government with the work
in question.

We intend to investigate the development of a chemical material which causes a reversible non-toxic
aberrant mental state, the specific nature of which can be reasonably well predicted for each individual.
This material could potentially aid in discrediting individuals, eliciting information, implanting
suggestion and other forms of mental control.

In a great many instances the work in field (a) must be conducted by individuals who are not and should
not be aware of our interest. In all cases dealing with field (b), it is mandatory that any connections with
the Agency should be known only to an absolute minimum number of people who have been specifically
cleared for this purpose.

Experience has shown that qualified, competent individuals in the field of pharmacological, physiological,
psychiatric and other biological sciences are most reluctant to enter into signed agreements of any sort
which connect them with this activity since such a connection would jeopardize their professional
reputations. Even internally in CIA, as few individuals as possible should be aware of our
interest in these fields and of the identity of those who are working for us. At present, this
results in ridiculous contracts, with cut-outs, which do not spell out the scope or intent of the
work.

Note: In the three CD set, this document is found appended to document 17748 on pp. 30 to 37.

CIA document and page number: 190885, p. 1


Title: None Given
Date:1 January 1950
Link to view image of original: Click here

Drug Project - A project in the isolation and synthesis of pure drugs for use in effecting psychological
entry and control of the individual.

Drugs and electricity - Research work on the effects of lysergic acid [LSD] on animals. Use of electric
shock and the encephalograph in interrogation. Particular emphasis on the detection and prior use
of electric shock and the 'guaranteed amnesia' resulting from electric shock.

Hypnosis - Investigation of the possibilities of hypnotic and post-hypnotic control.

CIA document and page number: 140394, pp. 2, 3 (not available in CD set, order individually
here)
Title: Interview with [Deleted]
Date: 25 February 1952
Link to view full text of both pages: Click here

Q: What are your experiences in general with hypnotism?

A: I have been a professional hypnotist for at least 15 years. At present, I am employed on a very
confidential basis two days a week.

Q: Can you obtain information from an individual, willing or unwilling, by hypnotism?

A: Definitely, yes. Many of the medical cases I work on are involved in obtaining personal,
intimate information, and through hypnotism, I have been quite successful in obtaining this. If
an individual refuses to co-operate with hypnosis, the doctors with whom I work use drugs,
always sodium amytal.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 44 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Q: How far do you think individuals could be controlled by hypnosis?

A: This is a very difficult subject. Post-hypnotics will last twenty years and will be very strong if re-
enforced from time to time.

Q: Have you ever had any experience with drugs?

A: Yes, many times. I have worked with doctors using sodium amytal and pentothal and have obtained
hypnotic control after the drugs were used. In fact, many times drugs were used for the purpose of
obtaining hypnotic control.

Q: Do you have any ideas that hypnotism could be used as a weapon?

A: Yes, I have thought about this often. It could certainly be used in obtaining information from
recalcitrant people particularly with drugs. It could be used as a recruiting source for special types of
work. A good hypnotist running hypnotic shows for entertainment would pick up a great many
subjects, some of whom might be exceptionally good subjects for us. These subjects could
easily be tabbed and put to use.

Q: Have you ever been able to produce hypnosis without an individual's knowledge?

A: Yes, through the relaxing technique and on rare occasions [I've] been able to produce hypnotism
against a person's will. However, you cannot count on this and to attempt to attach an individual who did
not want to be hypnotized alone would be almost an impossible task. In that type of case, I would use
sodium amytal and/or sodium pentothal.

Q: How effective are post-hypnotics; over what distances and time can they be effective?

A: Properly used post-hypnotics will last twenty years. They can be made more effective by re-
enforcement from time to time. Post-hypnotics are not affected at all by time or travel or distance away
from the person who placed the post-hypnotic. As a rule, post-hypnotics should be 100% effective in good
subjects.

Q: Can individuals be made to do things under hypnosis that they would not otherwise?

A: Individuals could be taught to do anything including murder, suicide, etc. I do believe that
you could carry out acts that would be against an individual's moral feelings if they were
rightly, psychologically conditioned.

Note: Individuals can be hypnotized without their knowledge. They can be programmed to commit
murder, suicide, and much more. Think about the implications. How many "suicides" of important
people we've heard in the news were not really suicides? How many murders were committed by
people who didn't even realize they were assassins? How much has this technology been used to
manipulate world politics? Think about the Kennedys, Martin Luther King, Jr., and possibly those
involved with 9/11 and other major terrorist attacks. Note this document is not available in the
three CD set and must be ordered individually at this link.

CIA document and page number: 140401, pp. 6, 7 (not available in CD set, order individually
here)
Title: Special Research, Bluebird
Date: 1 January 1952 (approximate)
Link to view full text of both pages: Click here

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 45 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Set out below are specific problems which can only be resolved by experiment, testing and
research.

Can we obtain control of the future activities (physical and mental) of any given individual, willing
or unwilling by application of SI [sleep induction] and H [hypnosis] techniques?
Can we create by post-H control an action contrary to an individual's basic moral principles?
Can we in a matter of an hour, two hours, one day, etc., induce an H condition in an unwilling
subject to such an extent that he will perform an act for our benefit?
Could we seize a subject and in the space of an hour or two by post-H control have him
crash an airplane, wreck a train, etc.?
Can we by H and SI techniques force a subject (unwilling or otherwise) to travel long distances,
commit specified acts and return to us or bring documents or materials?
Can we guarantee total amnesia under any and all conditions?
Can we "alter" a person's personality?
Can we devise a system for making unwilling subjects into willing agents and then transfer that
control to untrained agency agents in the field by use of codes or identifying signs?
Is it possible to find a gas that can be used to gain SI control from a gas pencil, odorless, colorless:
one shot, etc.?
What are full details on "sleep-inducing machine"?
How can sodium A or P or any other sleep inducing agent be best concealed in a normal
or commonplace item, such as candy, cigarettes, liquer, wines, coffee, tea, beer, gum
water, aspirin tablets, common medicines, coke, tooth paste?
Can we, using SI and H extract complicated formula from scientists, engineers, etc., if unwilling?

Note: Reading all of the declassified CIA documents listed in this essay suggests that the answer to
most, if not all of the questions above appears to be yes. Note that sleep inducing agents were
being placed in candy, aspirin, Coke, and more. Think about the implications if even just a few of
the men in these programs decided to use such things outside of the office to manipulate others for
their personal benefit. It's time that this information be made public so we can all be aware of
what's going on and work to stop the abuses. Note for some reason this document is not available
in the three CD set and must be ordered individually at this link.

Science Digest Article, pp. 44 - 53 (Not a CIA document, but related to the mind control
programs)
Title: Hypnosis Comes of Age
Date: April 1971
Link to view full text of article: Click here

Psychologist G. H. Estabrooks reminisces about his long career as a hypnotist. Dr. Estabrooks discusses
how he "programmed" American spies with hypnosis and how he helped businessmen and students with
his skills. Dr. Estabrooks is a Rhodes Scholar. He took his Doctorate at Harvard ('26), and has authored
many articles and books on clinical hypnosis and human behavior.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 46 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

One of the most fascinating but dangerous applications of hypnosis is its use in military intelligence. This
is a field with which I am familiar through formulating guidelines for the techniques used by the United
States in two world wars. I was involved in preparing many subjects for this work during World War II.

One successful case involved an Army Service Corps Captain whom we'll call George Smith. Captain Smith
had undergone months of training. He was an excellent subject but did not realize it. I had removed
from him, by post-hypnotic suggestion, all recollection of ever having been hypnotized. Outside
of myself, Colonel Brown was the only person who could hypnotize Captain Smith. This is "locking." I
performed it by saying to the hypnotized Captain: "Until further orders from me, only Colonel Brown and I
can hypnotize you. We will use a signal phrase 'the moon is clear.' " The system is virtually foolproof.

By the 1920's, not only had they learned to apply post-hypnotic suggestion, [they] also had
learned how to split certain complex individuals into multiple personalities like Jeckyl-Hydes.

During World War II, I worked this technique with a vulnerable Marine lieutenant I'll call Jones. Under the
watchful eye of Marine Intelligence, I spilt his personality into Jones A and Jones B. Jones A, once a
"normal" working Marine, became entirely different. He talked communist doctrine and meant it. He was
welcomed enthusiastically by communist cells, was deliberately given a dishonorable discharge by the
Corps (which was in on the plot) and became a card-carrying party member.

The joker was Jones B, the second personality, formerly apparent in the conscious Marine. Under
hypnosis, this Jones had been carefully coached by suggestion. Jones B was the deeper personality, knew
all the thoughts of Jones A, was a loyal American, and was "imprinted" to say nothing during conscious
phases. All I had to do was hypnotize the whole man, get in touch with Jones B, the loyal American, and I
had a pipeline straight into the Communist camp.

Note: This article shows that in the 1920s, U.S. military intelligence had already developed the
capability to cause split personalities. The created super spy or Manchurian Candidate has been a
reality for nearly a century, yet very few people know anything about it. These unknowing spies
could plant bombs, provide sexual favors, and even assassinate top political leaders. Consider that
many countries and key powerful, elite groups have had and used this technology for many
decades. Watch the movie Manchurian Candidate to see how real it is.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 47 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

E. Significant Events During the Bankruptcy Case


[Describe significant events during the Debtors bankruptcy case:

Describe any asset sales outside the ordinary course of business, debtor in possession
financing, or cash collateral orders.
Identify the professionals approved by the court.
Describe any adversary proceedings that have been filed or other significant litigation that
has occurred (including contested claim disallowance proceedings), and any other
significant legal or administrative proceedings that are pending or have been pending
during the case in a forum other than the Court.
Describe any steps taken to improve operations and profitability of the Debtor.
Describe other events as appropriate.]
THERE WAS ONLY LITIGATION EXPENSES AND THE RECEIPT OF SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY
BENEFITS FROM 2008 TO THE PRESENT.

F. Projected Recovery of Avoidable Transfers [Choose the option that applies]

[Option 1 If the Debtor does not intend to pursue avoidance actions]


The DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE does not intend to pursue preference, fraudulent
conveyance, or other avoidance
actions.

[Option 2 If the Debtor intends to pursue avoidance actions]


The Debtor estimates that up to $0. may be realized from the recovery of fraudulent,
preferential or other avoidable trans$0. may be realized from the recovery of fraudulent,
transfers. While the results of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty
and it is possible that other causes of action may be identified, the following is a summary of the
preference, fraudulent conveyance and other avoidance actions filed or expected to be filed in this case:
Transaction Defendant Amount Claimed
[Option 3 If the Debtor does not yet know whether it intends to pursue avoidance actions]

The Debtor has not yet completed its investigation with regard to prepetition transactions. If you
received a payment or other transfer within 90 days of the bankruptcy, or other transfer avoidable under
the Code, the Debtor may seek to avoid such transfer.

G. Claims Objections
Except to the extent that a claim is already allowed pursuant to a final non-appealable order, the
Debtor reserves the right to object to claims. Therefore, even if your claim is allowed for voting
purposes, you may not be entitled to a distribution if an objection to your claim is later upheld. The
procedures for resolving disputed claims are set forth in Article V of the Plan.

H. Current and Historical Financial Conditions


The identity and fair market value of the estate=s assets are listed in Exhibit B. [Identify source
and basis of valuation.]

The Debtor=s most recent financial statements [if any] issued before bankruptcy, each of which
was filed with the Court, are set forth in Exhibit C.
[The most recent post-petition operating report filed since the commencement of the Debtors
bankruptcy case are set forth in Exhibit D.] [A summary of the Debtors periodic operating reports
filed since the commencement of the Debtors bankruptcy case is set forth in Exhibit D.]

III. SUMMARY OF THE PLAN OF REORGANIZATION AND TREATMENT OF


CLAIMS AND EQUITY INTERESTS

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 48 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

A. What is the Purpose of the Plan of Reorganization?

As required by the Code, the Plan places claims and equity interests in various classes and
describes the treatment each class will receive. The Plan also states whether each class of claims or
equity interests is impaired or unimpaired. If the Plan is confirmed, your recovery will be limited to
the amount provided by the Plan.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS REORGANIZATION AND DISCLOSURE PLAN IS TO FORMALIZE THE
INTENT OF THE LITIGATION OF THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, AND TO ERMARK A
CERTAIN PORTION OF THE FUTURE SETTELMENTS FOR THE CREDITORS NAMED HEREIN.

B. Unclassified Claims
Certain types of claims are automatically entitled to specific treatment under the Code. They
are not considered impaired, and holders of such claims do not vote on the Plan. They may, however,
object if, in their view, their treatment under the Plan does not comply with that required by the Code.
As such, the Plan Proponent has not placed the following claims in any class:
NO CLAIMS APPLY

1. Administrative Expenses
Administrative expenses are costs or expenses of administering the Debtor=s chapter 11 case
which are allowed under 507(a)(2) of the Code. Administrative expenses also include the value of
any goods sold to the Debtor in the ordinary course of business and received within 20 days before the
date of the bankruptcy petition. The Code requires that all administrative expenses be paid on the
effective date of the Plan, unless a particular claimant agrees to a different treatment.
ALL PLAN COSTS ARE BORNE BY THE DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, AS A PRO SE LITIGANT.
THERE ARE NO PAID OR UNPAID PROFESSIONALS THAT CONTRIBUTE TO THIS CHAPTER 11
BANKRUPTCY FILING.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 49 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

The following chart lists the Debtor=s estimated administrative expenses, and their proposed
treatment under the Plan:
THERE WILL BE NO ADMINSTRATIVE EXPENSES CHARGED TO THIS BANKRUPTCY. THE
DEBTOR, STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, HANDLES ALL OF THE EXPENSES AS PRO SE BILLINGS
AND HAS RECENTLY CHARGED THEM TO DIRECTOR JAMES, COMEY OF THE FBI.

Paid in full on the effective date of the Plan Other administrative expenses Paid in full on the effective date
of the Plan or according to separate written agreement Office of the U.S. Trustee Fees Paid in full on the
effective date of the Plan
ANY EXPENSES TAKEN BY THE OFFICE OF THE US TRUSTEE IS LEGAL EXTORTION, CONSIDING
THE CIRCUMSTANCES AND WILL BE CONTESTED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT OF THE LAW.

2. Priority Tax Claims


Priority tax claims are unsecured income, employment, and other taxes described by
507(a)(8) of the Code. Unless the holder of such a 507(a)(8) priority tax claim agrees otherwise, it
must receive the present value of
THERE ARE NO PRIORITY TAX CLAIMS. THE DEBTOR HAS NOT HAD ANY TAXABLE INCOME
SINCE 2002.

C. Classes of Claims and Equity Interests


The following are the classes set forth in the Plan, and the proposed treatment that they will
receive under the Plan:
1. Classes of Secured Claims
Allowed Secured Claims are claims secured by property of the Debtor=s bankruptcy estate (or
that are subject to setoff) to the extent allowed as secured claims under 506 of the Code. If the value
of the collateral or setoffs securing the creditors claim is less than the amount of the creditors
allowed claim, the deficiency will [be classified as a general unsecured claim].
THERE ARE NO SECURED CLAIMS

The following chart lists all classes containing Debtor=s secured prepetition claims and their
proposed treatment under the Plan:
THERE ARE NO SECURED CLAIMS

2. Classes of Priority Unsecured Claims


Certain priority claims that are referred to in 507(a)(1), (4), (5), (6), and (7) of the Code are
required to be placed in classes. The Code requires that each holder of such a claim receive cash on
the effective date of the Plan equal to the allowed amount of such claim. However, a class of holders
of such claims may vote to accept different treatment.
THERE ARE NO PRIORITY UNSECURED CLAIMS

The following chart lists all classes containing claims under 507(a)(1), (4), (5), (6), and
(a)(7) of the Code and their proposed treatment under the Plan:
THERE ARE ONLY ONE CLASS OF UNSECURED CLAIMS

4. Class[es] of Equity Interest Holders


THERE ARE ONLY 4 SHAREHOLDERS WITH 4,000 SHARES TOTAL TO THE 996,000 OWNED BY
THE DEBTOR FOR ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, Ltd., THE OTHER COMPANIES THAT THE DEBTOR,
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE HAD REGISTERED AND INCORPORATED ARE FOR FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT GROUP, LTD., AND IT'S SUBSIDIARIES AND THE DEBTOR HAD NOT RESEARCHED
THE CURRENT OWNERSHIP. THE DEBTOR IS THE SOLE REGISTRANT IN 1986.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 50 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

The Plan, in Exhibit 5.1, lists all executory contracts and unexpired leases that the Debtor will
assume under the Plan. Assumption means that the Debtor has elected to continue to perform the
obligations under such contracts and unexpired leases, and to cure defaults of the type that must be
cured under the Code, if any. Exhibit 5.1 also lists how the Debtor will cure and compensate the other
party to such contract or lease for any such defaults.
If you object to the assumption of your unexpired lease or executory contract, the proposed
cure of any defaults, or the adequacy of assurance of performance, you must file and serve your
objection to the Plan within the deadline for objecting to the confirmation of the Plan, unless the Court
has set an earlier time.
All executory contracts and unexpired leases that are not listed in Exhibit 5.1 will be rejected
under the Plan. Consult your adviser or attorney for more specific information about particular
contracts or leases.
If you object to the rejection of your contract or lease, you must file and serve your objection to
the Plan within the deadline for objecting to the confirmation of the Plan.
[The Deadline for Filing a Proof of Claim Based on a Claim Arising from the Rejection of a
Lease or Contract Is . Any claim based on the rejection of a contract or lease will be barred if
the proof of claim is not timely filed, unless the Court orders otherwise.]
THERE ARE NONE

G. Tax Consequences of Plan


Creditors and Equity Interest Holders Concerned with How the Plan May Affect Their Tax
Liability Should Consult with Their Own Accountants, Attorneys, And/Or Advisors.
The following are the anticipated tax consequences of the Plan: [List the following general
consequences as a minimum: (1)Tax consequences to the Debtor of the Plan; (2) General tax
consequences on creditors of any discharge, and the general tax consequences of receipt of plan
consideration after confirmation.]
NONE

IV. CONFIRMATION REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES


To be confirmable, the Plan must meet the requirements listed in 1129(a) or (b) of the Code.
These include the requirements that: the Plan must be proposed in good faith; at least one impaired
class of claims must accept the plan, without counting votes of insiders; the Plan must distribute to
each creditor and equity interest holder at least as much as the creditor or equity interest holder would
receive in a chapter 7 liquidation case, unless the creditor or equity interest holder votes to accept the
Plan; and the Plan must be feasible. These requirements are not the only requirements listed in 1129,
and they are not the only requirements for confirmation.

A. Who May Vote or Object


Any party in interest may object to the confirmation of the Plan if the party believes that the
requirements for confirmation are not met.
Many parties in interest, however, are not entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. A
creditor or equity interest holder has a right to vote for or against the Plan only if that creditor or equity
interest holder has a claim or equity interest that is both (1) allowed or allowed for voting purposes and
(2) impaired.

In this case, the Plan Proponent believes that classes are impaired and that holders of
claims in each of these classes are therefore entitled to vote to accept or reject the Plan. The Plan
Proponent believes that classes are unimpaired and that holders of claims in each of these
classes, therefore, do not have the right to vote to accept or reject the Plan.
1. What Is an Allowed Claim or an Allowed Equity Interest?
Only a creditor or equity interest holder with an allowed claim or an allowed equity interest has
the right to vote on the Plan. Generally, a claim or equity interest is allowed if either (1) the Debtor
has scheduled the claim on the Debtor=s schedules, unless the claim has been scheduled as disputed,

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 51 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

contingent, or unliquidated, or (2) the creditor has filed a proof of claim or equity interest, unless an
objection has been filed to such proof of claim or equity interest. When a claim or equity interest is
not allowed, the creditor or equity interest holder holding the claim or equity interest cannot vote
unless the Court, after notice and hearing, either overrules the objection or allows the claim or equity
interest for voting purposes pursuant to Rule 3018(a) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.
The deadline for filing a proof of claim in this case was .
[If applicable The deadline for filing objections to claims is______.]

2. What Is an Impaired Claim or Impaired Equity Interest?


As noted above, the holder of an allowed claim or equity interest has the right to vote only if it
is in a class that is impaired under the Plan. As provided in 1124 of the Code, a class is considered
impaired if the Plan alters the legal, equitable, or contractual rights of the members of that class.

3. Who is Not Entitled to Vote


The holders of the following five types of claims and equity interests are not entitled to vote:

holders of claims and equity interests that have been disallowed by an order of the
Court;
holders of other claims or equity interests that are not allowed claims or allowed
equity interests (as discussed above), unless they have been allowed for voting
purposes.
holders of claims or equity interests in unimpaired classes;
holders of claims entitled to priority pursuant to 507(a)(2), (a)(3), and (a)(8) of the
Code; and
holders of claims or equity interests in classes that do not receive or retain any value
under the Plan;
administrative expenses.

Even If You Are Not Entitled to Vote on the Plan, You Have a Right to Object to the
Confirmation of the Plan [and to the Adequacy of the Disclosure Statement].

4. Who Can Vote in More Than One Class


A creditor whose claim has been allowed in part as a secured claim and in part as an unsecured
claim, or who otherwise hold claims in multiple classes, is entitled to accept or reject a Plan in each
capacity, and should cast one ballot for each claim.

B. Votes Necessary to Confirm the Plan


If impaired classes exist, the Court cannot confirm the Plan unless (1) at least one impaired
class of creditors has accepted the Plan without counting the votes of any insiders within that class, and
(2) all impaired classes have voted to accept the Plan, unless the Plan is eligible to be confirmed by
Acram down@ on non-accepting classes, as discussed later in Section [B.2.].

1. Votes Necessary for a Class to Accept the Plan


A class of claims accepts the Plan if both of the following occur: (1) the holders of more than
one-half (1/2) of the allowed claims in the class, who vote, cast their votes to accept the Plan, and (2)
the holders of at least two-thirds (2/3) in dollar amount of the allowed claims in the class, who vote,
cast their votes to accept the Plan. A class of equity interests accepts the Plan if the holders of at least
two-thirds (2/3) in amount of the allowed equity interests in the class, who vote, cast their votes to
accept the Plan.

2. Treatment of Nonaccepting Classes


Even if one or more impaired classes reject the Plan, the Court may nonetheless confirm the
Plan if the nonaccepting classes are treated in the manner prescribed by 1129(b) of the Code. A plan
that binds nonaccepting classes is commonly referred to as a Acram down@ plan. The Code allows the
Plan to bind nonaccepting classes of claims or equity interests if it meets all the requirements for

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 52 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

consensual confirmation except the voting requirements of 1129(a)(8) of the Code, does not
Adiscriminate unfairly,@ and is Afair and equitable@ toward each impaired class that has not voted to
accept the Plan.

You should consult your own attorney if a Acramdown@ confirmation will affect your claim or
equity interest, as the variations on this general rule are numerous and complex.

C. Liquidation Analysis
To confirm the Plan, the Court must find that all creditors and equity interest holders who do
not accept the Plan will receive at least as much under the Plan as such claim and equity interest
holders would receive in a chapter 7 liquidation. A liquidation analysis is attached to this Disclosure
Statement as Exhibit E.

D. Feasibility
The Court must find that confirmation of the Plan is not likely to be followed by the
liquidation, or the need for further financial reorganization, of the Debtor or any successor to the
Debtor, unless such liquidation or reorganization is proposed in the Plan.
1. Ability to Initially Fund Plan
The Plan Proponent believes that the Debtor will have enough cash on hand on the effective
date of the Plan to pay all the claims and expenses that are entitled to be paid on that date. Tables
showing the amount of cash on hand on the effective date of the Plan, and the sources of that cash
are attached to this disclosure statement as Exhibit F.

2. Ability to Make Future Plan Payments And Operate Without Further Reorganization
The Plan Proponent must also show that it will have enough cash over the life of the Plan to
make the required Plan payments.
The Plan Proponent has provided projected financial information. Those projections are listed
in Exhibit G.

The Plan Proponents financial projections show that the Debtor will have an aggregate annual
average cash flow, after paying operating expenses and post-confirmation taxes, of $ . The final
Plan payment is expected to be paid on .
[Summarize the numerical projections, and highlight any assumptions that are not in accord with
past experience. Explain why such assumptions should now be made.]
THERE WILL BE NO CASHFLOW UNTIL SETTELMENTS ARE REACHED. THERE WILL BE NO
DISTRIBUTIONS TO THIS BANKRUPTCY PLAN UNTIL 100% OF THE THE DEBTOR, STAN J.
CATERBONE, PRO SE, PRO SE BILLINGS AND ACCOUNTS RECIEVABLES ARE COLLECTED IN
FULL.

You Should Consult with Your Accountant or other Financial Advisor If You Have Any
Questions Pertaining to These Projections.

V.EFFECT OF CONFIRMATION OF PLAN

A. NO DISCHARGE OF DEBTOR [If the Debtor is not entitled to discharge pursuant to 11


U.S.C. 1141(d)(3) change this heading to NO DISCHARGE OF DEBTOR.]
[Option 1 If Debtor is an individual and 1141(d)(3) is not applicable]

Discharge. Confirmation of the Plan does not discharge any debt provided for in the Plan until
the court grants a discharge on completion of all payments under the Plan, or as otherwise provided in
1141(d)(5) of the Code. Debtor will not be discharged from any debt excepted from discharge under
523 of the Code, except as provided in Rule 4007(c) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 53 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

[Option 2 -- If the Debtor is a partnership and 1141(d)(3) of the Code is not


applicable]
Discharge. On the effective date of the Plan, the Debtor shall be discharged from any debt that
arose before confirmation of the Plan, subject to the occurrence of the effective date, to the extent
specified in 1141(d)(1)(A) of the Code. However, the Debtor shall not be discharged from any debt
imposed by the Plan. After the effective date of the Plan your claims against the Debtor will be limited
to the debts imposed by the Plan.

[Option 3 -- If the Debtor is a corporation and 1141(d)(3) is not applicable]


Discharge. On the effective date of the Plan, the Debtor shall be discharged from any debt that
arose before confirmation of the Plan, subject to the occurrence of the effective date, to the extent
specified in 1141(d)(1)(A) of the Code, except that the Debtor shall not be discharged of any debt (i)
imposed by the Plan, (ii) of a kind specified in 1141(d)(6)(A) if a timely complaint was filed in
accordance with Rule 4007(c) of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, or (iii) of a kind
specified in 1141(d)(6)(B). After the effective date of the Plan your claims against the Debtor will
be limited to the debts described in clauses (i) through (iii) of the preceding sentence.

[Option 4 If 1141(d)(3) is applicable]


No Discharge. In accordance with 1141(d)(3) of the Code, the Debtor will not receive any
discharge of debt in this bankruptcy case.

B. Modification of Plan
The Plan Proponent may modify the Plan at any time before confirmation of the Plan.
However, the Court may require a new disclosure statement and/or revoting on the Plan.
[If the Debtor is not an individual, add the following: AThe Plan Proponent may also seek to modify the
Plan at any time after confirmation only if (1) the Plan has not been substantially consummated and (2)
the Court authorizes the proposed modifications after notice and a hearing.@]
[If the Debtor is an individual, add the following: AUpon request of the Debtor, the United
States trustee, or the holder of an allowed unsecured claim, the Plan may be modified at any time after
confirmation of the Plan but before the completion of payments under the Plan, to (1) increase or
reduce the amount of payments under the Plan on claims of a particular class, (2) extend or reduce the
time period for such payments, or (3) alter the amount of distribution to a creditor whose claim is
provided for by the Plan to the extent necessary to take account of any payment of the claim made
other than under the Plan.@]

C. Final Decree

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 54 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Once the estate has been fully administered, as provided in Rule 3022 of the Federal Rules of
Bankruptcy Procedure, the Plan Proponent, or such other party as the Court shall designate in the Plan
Confirmation Order, shall file a motion with the Court to obtain a final decree to close the case.
Alternatively, the Court may enter such a final decree on its own motion.

VI. OTHER PLAN PROVISIONS

[Insert other provisions here, as necessary and appropriate.]

Respectfully submitted,

By: STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE, THE DEBTOR


The Plan Proponent

By: NONE
Attorney for the Plan Proponent

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 55 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

EXHIBITS

INTERNET LINKS OF INTEREST

ERIC COHEN AND ROBERT BERUBE, Federal Public Defender for Esteban Santiago, Ft. Lauderdale Shooter,
INVOICE AND FEE SCHEDULE January 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337072519/ERIC-COHEN-Federal-Public-Defender-for-Esteban-
Santiago-Ft-Lauderdale-Shooter-INVOICE-AND-FEE-SCHEDULE-January-20-2017

STAN CATERBONE NAMED AMICUS FOR KATHLEEN KANE Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 3575
EDA 2016 FRIDAY JANUARY 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337120127/STAN-CATERBONE-NAMED-AMICUS-FOR-
KATHLEEN-KANE-Superior-Court-of-Pennsylvania-Case-No-3575-EDA-2016-FRIDAY-JANUARY-20-
2017

WHISTLEBLOWERS KAREN STEWART AND STAN CATERBONE A Candid Discussion of Electronic


Harassment Protocols, January 11, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336256943/WHISTLEBLOWERS-KAREN-STEWART-AND-STAN-
CATERBONE-A-Candid-Discussion-of-Electronic-Harassment-Protocols-January-11-2017

The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking Program


https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/surreptitious-reincarnation-cointelpro-cops-program-stan-
caterbone

Video: Media Blacks Out Edward Snowdens Talk On COINTELPRO & History Of Mass Surveillance
http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-media-blacks-out-edward-snowdens-talk-on-cointelpro-
history-of-mass-surveillance/224222/

Letters: Snowden deserves pardon by John and Bonnie Raines, Philadelphia of the Citizens Commission to
Investigate the FBI in 1971
http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20170119_Letters__Snowden_deserves_pardon.html

Legal Implications of the Soviet Microwave Bombardment of the U.S. Embassy


https://www.scribd.com/document/336787302/Legal-Implications-of-the-1959-Soviet-Microwave-
Bombardment-of-the-U-S-Embassy-January-17-2017

Congressman Robert Walker Pleading July 7 1991 Important


https://www.scribd.com/document/270267368/Congressman-Robert-Walker-Pleading-July-7-
1991-Important

That time the CIA was convinced a self-proclaimed psychic had paranormal abilities
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/01/19/that-time-the-cia-was-
convinced-a-self-proclaimed-psychic-had-paranormal-abilities/?
postshare=8421484844095309&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.b487b6ae00e7

Obama's most enduring legacy may be the establishment of the modern US surveillance state
http://www.businessinsider.com/obamas-most-enduring-legacy-the-modern-us-surveillance-state-
2017-1

The Extortion of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pa by COINTELPRO PROGRAMS January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336832214/The-Extortion-of-220-Stone-Hill-Road-Conestoga-
Pa-by-COINTELPRO-PROGRAMS-January-17-2017

AMG LEGAL SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE Mastered on April 16, 1991 at Commadore Inc., January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787897/AMG-LEGAL-SYSTEMS-PROTOTYPE-Mastered-on-April-16-1991-at-
Commadore-Inc-January-17-2017

Stan J. Caterbone, Controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., 1993 to 1998 January 17, 2017

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 56 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

https://www.scribd.com/document/336787739/Stan-J-Caterbone-Controller-of-Pflumm-Contractors-Inc-1993-to-
1998-January-17-2017

Sam Lombardo and Raolph Mazzochi Charlotte Street Proposal by Advanced Media Group and Stan J.
Caterbone January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787416/Sam-Lombardo-and-Raolph-Mazzochi-Charlotte-Street-Proposal-by-
Advanced-Media-Group-and-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-17-2017

B2B Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16, 2017


https://www.scribd.com/document/336787303/B2B-Consulting-From-1999-to-2002-January-16-2017

1999 Excelsior Place Business Plan by Stan J. Caterbone January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336719627/1999-Excelsior-Place-Business-Plan-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-16-
2017

Stan J. Caterbone AIM MUTUAL FUNDS Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336738750/Stan-J-Caterbone-AIM-MUTUAL-FUNDS-Consulting-From-1999-to-
2002-January-16-2017

Pro Financial Group Brochure and Eastern Regional Free Agent Camp by Stan J. Caterbone January 16,
2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336704842/Pro-Financial-Group-Brochure-and-Eastern-Regional-Free-Agent-
Camp-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-16-2017

STAN J. CATERBONE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP JOINT VENTURE WITH DALE HIGH January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637179/56-STAN-J-CATERBONE-ADVANCED-MEDIA-GROUP-JOINT-VENTURE-
WITH-DALE-HIGH-January-15-2017

Institutional Investors Mortgage Banking Business Development of 1987 January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637178/58-Institutional-Investors-Mortgage-Banking-Business-Development-
of-1987-January-15-2017

1987 JOINT VENTURE - Tony Bongiovi, Power Station Studios, and Flatbush Films with Stan J. Caterbone
January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637176/55-1987-JOINT-VENTURE-Tony-Bongiovi-Power-Station-Studios-and-
Flatbush-Films-with-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-15-2017

STAN J. CATERBONE'S Financial Management Group, Ltd., Anti-Trust Litigation File of October 17, 2015
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637173/57-STAN-J-CATERBONE-S-Financial-Management-Group-Ltd-Anti-
Trust-Litigation-File-of-October-17-2015

FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence Agencies November 12, 2016

https://www.scribd.com/document/329761557/FALSE-IMPRISONMENT-AND-ILLEGAL-INTERROGATIONS-by-U-S-
Intelligence-Agencies-and-U-S-Sponsored-Mind-Control-EVIDENCE-November-2-2016

Scribd

Letter REQUEST for COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to President Obama, November 15, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone and Conflicts With the Trump Administration - Monday November 14, 2016 | False Claims Act |
Military

STAN J. CATERBONE and the DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE Documents and Evidence of Conspiracy to .... Saturday
November 12, 2016

Feds Probe Fulton Bank and 3 Other Subsidiary Banks of Fulton Financial With Stan J. Caterbone Civil Actions and
Mind Control Research of Monday November 9, 2016 | Robert Gates

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 57 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Letter to James Comey, Director of FBI Re Cointelpro Used to Obstruct Justice Monday November 28, 2016 | Federal
Bureau Of Investigation | Central Intelligence Agency

VITALLY IMPORTANT - LETTER and DOCUMENT to Cappello & Noel, LLP of Santa Barbara, CA Friday November 25,
2016

Report of Douglas F Gansler/Kathleen Kane on Misuse of Commonwealth Email Systems November 22, 2016 Published
by ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP |

Pro Se Legal Representation In The United States | Motion In United States Law

Lancaster Mayor Rick Gray Says There is Room for Improvement in Police Communication - CATERBONE v. Lancaster
City Police Bureau, et.al., November 22, 2016 | Central Intelligence Agency

Chapter 12 - ROHYPNOL AND SATELLITE and Chapter 11 - NEIGHBORS FROM HELL, from Satellite Terrorism in
America, by Dr. John Hall Copyright 2009
| J. Edgar Hoover | Federal Bureau Of Investigation

JIM GUERIN, FOUNDER OF ISC, FAREWELL LETTER OF 1989 December 26, 2016 | Justice | Government
CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON Candidate for JUDGESHIP and His 1987 EFFORT FOR MY GUARDIANSHIP Friday December
16, 2016

ANOTHER LANCASTER COVER-UP THE SALE OF THE MASONIC HALL IN THE CITY OF LANCASTER, by The Advanced
Media Group, December 15, 2016 | Fraternal Service Organizations

Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com TOTALS and MONTHLY From May of 2016 to January
2017 - January 10, 2017

My Friend and Colleague Soleilmavis Liu of China a Victim of Mind Control Living in China Who Started Peacepink-
August 28, 2016

TD Ameritrade TRADEKEEPER PROFIT-LOSS FOR 2004 TRADES and 2017 FULTON STOCK January 9, 2017

POLICE INCIDENT REPORTS OF PHYSICAL ASSAULTS FOR STAN J. CATERBONE 2005 TO 2016 January 6, 2017

Judiciaries

UPDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS re CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Department US District Court Case 08-cv-
08982 December 28, 2016

Section 504 Of The Rehabilitation Act | Rehabilitation Act Of 1973

UPDATED - EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as Targeted Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control and Related Hearings and Lectures, December 27, 2016

Torture

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 58 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Exhibit A B Copy of Proposed Plan of Reorganization

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 59 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Exhibit B B Identity and Value of Material Assets of Debtor

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 60 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Exhibit C B Prepetition Financial Statements


(to be taken from those filed with the court)

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 61 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Exhibit D B [Most Recently Filed Postpetition Operating Report][Summary of Postpetition


Operating Reports]

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 62 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Exhibit E Liquidation Analysis


Plan Proponents Estimated Liquidation Value of Assets
Assets

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 63 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

Exhibit F Cash on hand on the effective date of the Plan


Cash on hand on effective date of the Plan:
Less B

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 64 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

B25B (Official Form 25B) (12/08) Cont. 24


Exhibit G B Projections of Cash Flow and Earnings for Post-Confirmation Period

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 65 of 66 February 7, 2017


DEBTOR STANLEY J. CATERBONE, PRO SE

17-10615 CHAPTER 11 REORGANIZATION PLAN Page 66 of 66 February 7, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &

Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200

LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS


MAJISTERIAL DISTRICT JUDGE ADAM J. WITKONIS - MDJ-02-1-01
___________________________________________________

Stanley J. Caterbone :
DEFENDANT : MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016
:
:

MOTION TO DISMISS

AND NOW, on this 9th day of February 9, 2017, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE, appearing pro
se, do hereby file this MOTION TO DISMISS THE CHARGE OF LO-198-4 (LEAD) NOISE TO
LOUD. THE DEFENDANT WILL SUCCESSFULLY ARGUE THAT THE ABOVE CHARGE IS:

PREJUDICIAL AND RETALIOTORY

UNFOUNDED WITH NO EVIDENCE

LODGED IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE ONGOING PROGRAM OF HARASSMENT,


STALKING, VANDALISM, ETC., BY THE OCCUPANTS OF 1252 FREMONT STREET,
NEXT DOOR NEIGHBORS

FORMAL COMPLAINTS HAVE BEEN FILED REGARDING THE HARASSMENT


PROGRAM OF 1252 FREMONT STREET SINCE 2006.

THE RADIO IN QUESTION WAS ACCESSABLE AND COMPLETELY OPERABLE BY


ANYONE THAT ENTERED THE BACKYARD AND PATIO OF THE DEFENDANT. THE
ELECTRICAL POWER CORD WAS ALWAYS PLUGGED INTO AN EXTENSION CORD
RUNNING IN THROUGH THE KITCHEN WINDOW AND PLUGGED IN. ANYONE
COULD HAVE PLAYED THAT RADIO IN THE EARLY MORNING IN QUESTION AND
WITH THE PATIO BEING CLOSED-IN EXCEPT A DOORWAY, THE PERPETRATORS
WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN VISIBLE TO ANYONE IN EITHER THE BACK ALLEY, OR
THE ADJACENT YARDS.

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 1 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Dated February 9, 2017

___________/S/____________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP

Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
stancaterbone@gmail.com
717-528-2200

Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and
publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud
within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the
truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public
corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications
are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a
member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County
and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture
from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?

ACTIVE COURT CASES


J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals - COMPLAINT
OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re ALL FEDERAL
LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for
Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-
49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751 PETITION FOR
HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal Case No. CP-36-SA-
0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA 2015; 1519 MDA 2015;
16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472 INJUNCTION re Pain
Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case No. 16-10157

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 2 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 3 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

JURISDICTION

ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED IN MOTION TO DISMISS

1. Judicial Misconduct
2. Selective and Retaliatory Discrimination under the 1990 Disabilities Act
3. Using the Courts for Political Vendettas
4. Attempted Extortion of Real Monies
5. Libel and Slander
6. Collusion of COINTELPRO-LIKE Tactics with Law Enforcement

The Court MUST consider the leqal circumstances surrounding my Whistleblowing activities
and the Federal False Claims Act filing of the APPELLANT as it relates to the past 28 years and the
myriad of violations of the Lancaster County District Attorney. The APPELLANT will argue that it is
wholly unfair and unconstitutional not to grant the APPELLANT In Forma Pauperis Status. The
APPELLANT has filed ample evidence of a pattern and relentless cycle of earning and accumulating
capital and assets, as well building substantial worth through his business interests, only to have
it all extorted through an elaborate civil and criminal scheme to defruad. Therefore any
attempt to subject the APPELLANT to more court related fees is only a continuation of
that same said fraud.

Consideration MUST be given to Pederson v. South Williamsport Area School District,


where the courts interpreted due process, as Essentially fundamental fairness is exactly what due
process means. Furthermore, the United States District Courts in Perry v. Coyler (1978, 524 F
2d. 644) have concluded the following: Even the probability of unfairness can result in a
defendant being deprived of his due process rights. The focus of these claims are recorded in
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 05-2288 and 06-4650. In
addition the Petioner is the MOVANT in the Lisa Michelle Lambrerrt Case and recently filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment, 04-2559, which was recently appealed to the Third Circuit Court
of Appeals. The preceding cases have been preserved by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in
case no. 07-4474, see attached.

The prosecutorial misconduct the the APPELLANT has been subject to has violated his
constitutional rights, but more importantly the abuse or process has prevented the APPELLANT
from completing a wealth of claims in both state and federal Courts. 1983 Civil Rights Acts and
18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the scheme of protecting
constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations to obtain redress, to provide
for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations when state criminal proceedings are

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 4 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to strike a balance between protection of
individual rights from state infringement and protection from state and local government from
federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241, 242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5,
15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982, 1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.

A case can be made for a RICO violation as defined in the case of United States v. Holck,
389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple conspiracies by the
following: Governments, without committing variance between single conspiracy charges in an
indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at continuing core conspiracy which
attracts different members at different times and which involves different subgroups committing
acts in furtherance of an overall plan. This illustrates the legal analysis of the 1987 conspiracy to
cover-up my International Signal & Control, Plc., whistle blowing activities.

The DEFENDANT HAS 29 False Arrests in the County of Lancaster dating back to 1987,
which under Pennsylvania Law, constitute a conspiracy that may be proved by circumstantial
evidence that is by acts and circumstances sufficient to warrant an inference that the unlawful
combination has been in front of facts formed for the purpose charged. See Walcker v. North
Wales Boro, 395 F. Supp. 2d. 219. In the same case the following was supported: Arrestees
allegations that the township (Conestoga) and its police officers were acting in concert and
conspiracy and with the purpose of violating arrestees constitutional rights by subjecting him to
unreasonable force, arrest, search, and malicious prosecution and the two (2) or more officers
acted together in throwing arrestee to the ground (April 5 th, 2006 and August 4th, 2006) and
forcing him to take two (2) blood tests and holding him in custody. The preceding pleaded civil
conspiracy claims under Pennsylvania Law.

In order to state a claim for civil conspiracy and a cause of action under Pennsylvania Law,
a plaintiff must allege that two (2) or more persons agree or combine with lawful intent to
do an unlawful act or to do an otherwise lawful act by unlawful means, with proof of malice
with intent to injure the person, his/her property and or business. In the case of United
States v. Holck, 389 F. Supp. 2d. 338, criminal responsibility defines single or multiple
conspiracies by the following: Governments, without committing variance between single
conspiracy charges in an indictment and its proof at trial may establish existence at
continuing core conspiracy which attracts different members at different times and which
involves different subgroups committing acts in furtherance of an overall plan. 1983 Civil
Rights Acts and 18 U.S.C.A. Acts state the following: The underlying purpose of the
scheme of protecting constitutional rights are to permit victims of constitutional violations
to obtain redress, to provide for federal prosecution of serious constitutional violations
when state criminal proceedings are ineffective for purpose of deterring violations and to

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 5 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

strike a balance between protection of individual rights from state infringement and
protection from state and local government from federal interference, 18 U.S.C.A. 241,
242; U.S.C.A. Const. Art. 2, 53; Amend. 13, 14, 5, 15, 2: 42 U.S.C.A. 1981-1982,
1985, 1988, Fed. Rules Civil Proc. Rule 28, U.S.C.A.

Under RICO, a person or group who commits any two of 35 crimes27 federal crimes and
8 state crimeswithin a 10-year period and, in the opinion of the US Attorney bringing the case,
has committed those crimes with similar purpose or results can be charged with racketeering.
Those found guilty of racketeering can be fined up to $25,000 and/or sentenced to 20 years in
prison. In addition, the racketeer must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business
gained through a pattern of "racketeering activity." The act also contains a civil component that
allows plaintiffs to sue for triple damages. When the U.S. Attorney decides to indict someone
under RICO, he has the option of seeking a pre-trial restraining order or injunction to prevent the
transfer of potentially forfeitable property, as well as require the defendant to put up a
performance bond. This provision is intended to force a defendant to plead guilty before
indictment. There is also a provision for private parties to sue. A "person damaged in his business
or property" can sue one or more "racketeers." There must also be an "enterprise." The
defendant(s) are not the enterprise, in other words, the defendant(s) and the enterprise are not
one and the same. There must be one of four specified relationships between the defendant(s)
and the enterprise. This lawsuit, like all Federal civil lawsuits, can take place in either Federal or
State court. http://www.dealer-magazine.com/index.asp?article=481

1
Where RICO laws might be applied
Although some of the RICO predicate acts are extortion and blackmail, one of the most
Successful applications of the RICO laws has been the ability to indict or sanction individuals for
their behavior and actions committed against witnesses and victims in alleged retaliation or
retribution for cooperating with law enforcement or intelligence agencies. The RICO laws can be
alleged in cases where civil lawsuits or criminal charges are brought against individuals or
corporations in retaliation for said individuals or corporations working with law enforcement, or

1References

RICO Suave (http://www.snopes.com/language/acronyms/rico.asp) . Snopes.com: (21 December


2004). Retrieved on 2006-03-26. 1.
External links
RICO Act from Cornell University'sU. S. Code database
(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_96.html) Detail of Tanya
Andersen's claim against Atlantic Records (http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2005/10/oregon-
riaa-victim-fights-back- sues.html) Retrieved from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and_Corrupt_Organizations_Act Categories: Articles with
weasel words | United States federal legislation | Organized crime terminology

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 6 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

against individuals or corporations who have sued or filed criminal charges against a defendant.
Anti-SLAPP (strategic lawsuit against public participation) laws can be applied in an attempt
to curb alleged abuses of the legal system by individuals or corporations who utilize the courts as
a weapon to retaliate against whistle blowers, victims, or to silence another's speech. RICO could
be alleged if it can be shown that lawyers and/or their clients conspired and collaborated to
concoct fictitious legal complaints solely in retribution and retaliation for themselves having been
brought before the courts. These laws also apply to victims of clergy abuse where statute of
limitations has run out.

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 7 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Stan J. Caterbone/Advanced Media Group Biography

Present - Advanced Media Group, President, Owner, and Founder.

In 1987 I became a federal whistleblower for the case of local defense contractor International
Signal and Control, or ISC. ISC was a black ops program for the NSA and CIA that was convicted
in 1992 for an elaborate scheme to arm Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries with a broad
array of weapons, most notably cluster bombs. It was the third larges fraud in U.S. History at
that time. I have been a victim of organized stalking since 1987 and a victim of electronic and
direct energy weapons since 2005. I had also been telepathic since 2005. In 2005 the U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy; synthetic telepathy;
hacking of all electronic devices; vandilism and thefts of personal property, extortions, intellectual
property violations, obstruction of justice; violations of due process; thefts and modifications of
court documents; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices and weapons
that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This assault was
no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District
Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This assault began after
the handlers remotely trained/sychronized Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main
difference opposed to most other victims of this technology is that I am connected 24/7 with the
same person who declares telepathically she is a known celebrity. Over the course of 10 years I
have been telepathic with at least 20 known persons and have spent 10 years trying to validate
and confirm their identities without success. Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate,
and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment and act
on the numerous formal complaints that are filed in their respective offices. Most complaints are
focused on the routine victimization's of a targeted individual including but not limited to stalking,
harassment, threats, vandalism, thefts, extortion, burglaries, false imprisonments, fabricated
mental health warrants or involuntary commitments, pain and torture to the body, and most often
the cause of obstruction of justice is the computer hacking.

I have a very sophisticated and authentic library of evidence of the use of U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control technologies on my father and brother that dates back to the 1940's while my father was
in the U.S. Navy after he graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Florida, including an
affidavit motorized and authenticated by my father in 1996. My brother served in the U.S. Air
force and was victim to LSD experiments of the infamous MKULTRA program in the late 1960's.

In 2016 I was the AMICUS for Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane in the Pennsylvania
Superior Court Case No. 1164 EDA 2016 in the COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. Kane
which included perjury charges during the alleged leaking of grand jury information. Kathleen
Kane took on the Good Old Boy network regarding judicial reform in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania in an effort to rid the state of the long standing public corruption ring that was
evident from local law enforcement to Supreme Court Justices, and everyone in between.

In 2015 I filed an amicus curie on behalf of Lisa Michelle Lambert who was convicted in 1992 of
the murder of Laurie Show, both of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. I currently am in litigation in the
U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals and in February of 2016 Lisa Michelle Lambert published her
book titled Corruption in Lancaster County My Story, which is available in bookstores and on
Amazon.com. I am in frequent contact with her co-author, Dave Brown of Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania.

In 2009 I Proposed an ORGANIZED STALKING AND DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS HARASSMENT


BILL to Pennsylvania House of Representative Mike Sturla (Lancaster, Pennsylvania) and City of
Lancaster Mayor Richard Gray in 2009. The draft legislation is the work of Missouri House of
Representative Jim Guest, who has been working on helping victims of these horrendous crimes
for years. The bill will provide protections to individuals who are being harassed, stalked, harmed
by surveillance, and assaulted; as well as protections to keep individuals from becoming human
research subjects, tortured, and killed by electronic frequency devices, directed energy devices,

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 8 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

implants, and directed energy weapons. I again reintroduced the bill to the Pennsylvania General
Assembly in 2015 and frequented the Pennsylvania Capitol trying to find support and a sponsor;
which I still do to this day.

In 2006 I began his role as an Activist Shareholder for Fulton Financial, which is listed as "FULT"
on the NASDAQ stock exchange. As a founder of Financial Management Group, Ltd., a full service
financial firm, Stan J. Caterbone has drawn upon the success in developing the strategic vision for
his company and the experience gained in directing the legal affairs and public offering efforts in
dealing with Fulton Financial. I have been in recent discussions with the Fulton Financial Board of
Directors with regards to various complaints dealing with such issues as the Resource Bank
acquisition and the subprime failures. I believe that Fulton Financial needs management to
become more aggressive in it's strategic planning and the performance it expects from it's
management team in order to increase shareholder value. Expanding the footprint of the regional
bank has not yielded an increase to the bottom line that is consistent with the expectations of
shareholders. Lancaster County has seen several local banking institutions acquired by larger
regional banks, thus increasing the competition Fulton Financial will see in it's local marketplace as
well as in it's regional footprint.
In 2005 I, as a Pro Se Litigant filed several civil actions as Plaintiffs that are in current litigation
in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the United States Third
District Court of Appeals, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, The Pennsylvania Superior Court, the
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, The Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania. These litigations include violations of intellectual property rights, anti-trust
violations, and interference of contracts relating to several business interests. Central to this
litigation is the Digital Movie, Digital Technologies, Financial Management Group, Ltd,/FMG
Advisory, Ltd., and its affiliated businesses along with a Federal False Claims Act or Federal
Whistleblowers Act regarding the firm of International Signal and Control, Plc., (ISC) the $1Billion
Dollar Fraud and the Export violations of selling arms to South Africa and Iraq. This litigation dates
back to 1987. Stan J. Caterbone was a shareholder of ISC, and was solicited by ISC executives for
professional services. The Federal False Claims Act is currently part of RICO Civil Complaint in the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and the Third Circuit Court of
Appeals, as docket no. 05-2288.

In 2005 Advanced Media Group/Project Hope filed a Civil Action in the Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County against Drew Anthon and the Eden Resort Inn for their attempts to withhold the
Tourism Tax and Hotel Tax that supports the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center & Marriot.
We also proposed an alternative plan to move the Convention Center to the Hotel Brunswick and
Lancaster Square to all of the major stakeholders. The Lancaster County Convention Center is
finally under construction with a March 2009 Opening date.

In 2005 I was selected to attend the Clinton Global Initiative in New York City after
submission of an essay with and application. I received the invitation from Bruce R. Lindsey, Chief
Executive Officer of the William J. Clinton Foundation.

In 2005 I began our philanthropic endeavors by spending our energies and working with such
organizations as; ONE.org, Livestrong.org, WoundedWarriors.org, The Clinton Global Initiative,
Lancaster Convention Center Authority, Lancaster Chamber of Commerce, Toms Project Hope,
People to People International, GlobalWarming.org, Contact Lancaster/24 Hour Suicide Hotline,
Schreiber Pediatric Center, and numerous others.

In 2004 I embarked on our past endeavors in the music and entertainment industries with an
emphasis on assisting for the fair and equitable distribution of artists rights and royalties in the
fight against electronic piracy. We have attempted to assist in developing new business models to
address the convergence of physical and electronic mediums; as it displaces royalties and
revenues for those creating, promoting, and delivering a range of entertainment content via
wireless networks.

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 9 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

In 2000 to 2002 I developed an array of marketing and communication tools for wholesalers of
the AIM Investment Group and managed several communication programs for several of the
company wholesalers throughout the United States and Costa Rica. We also began a Day Trading
project that lasted until 2004 with success.
In 1999 I developed a comprehensive business plan to develop the former Sprecher Brewery,
known as the Excelsior Building on E. King Street, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania. This plan was
developed in conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic Development Plan for the
Revitalization of Downtown Lancaster and the Downtown Lancaster Convention Center for the
former Watt & Shand building.

In 1999 I contributed to the debate, research, and implementation of strategies to counter the
effects of the global Y2K threat to the worlds computer technologies. I attended the U.S.
Sponsored Y2K symposium and Conference in Washington, D.C. hosted by the Senate Y2K
Subcommittee and Senator William Bennett.

In 1998 I had began to administer the charity giving of Toms Project Hope, a non-profit
organization promoting education and awareness for mental illness and suicide prevention. We
had provided funding for the Mental Health Alliance of Lancaster County, Contact Lancaster (The
24/7 Suicide Prevention Hotline), The Schreiber Pediatric Center, and other charitable
organizations and faith based charities. The video "Numbers Don't Lie" have been distributed to
schools, non profit organizations, faith based initiatives, and municipalities to provide educational
support for the prevention of suicide and to bring awareness to mental illness problems.

In 1996 I had done consulting for companies under KAL, Inc., during the time that I was
controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., I was retained by Gallo Rosso Restaurant and Bar to
computerized their accounting and records management from top to bottom. I had also provided
consulting for the computerization of accounting and payroll for Lancaster Container, Inc., of
Washington Boro. I was retained to evaluate and develop an action plan to migrate the
Informations Technologies of the Jay Group, formally of Ronks, PA, now relocated to a new $26
Million Dollar headquarters located in West Hempfield Township of Lancaster County. The Jay
Group had been using IBM mainframe technologies hosted by the AS 400 computer and server. I
was consulting on the merits of migrating to a PC based real time networking system throughout
the entire organization. Currently the Jay Group employees some 500 employees with revenues in
excess of $50 Million Dollars per year.

In 1993 I was retained by Pflumm Contractors, Inc., as controller, and was responsible for saving
the company from a potential bankruptcy. At that time, due to several unpaid contracts, the
company was facing extreme pressure from lenders and the bonding insurance company. We were
responsible for implementing computerized accounting, accounting and contract policies and
procedures, human resource policies and procedures, marketing strategies, performance
measurement reporting, and negotiate for the payment of unpaid contracts. The bonding company
was especially problematic, since it was the lifeline to continue work and bidding for public
contracts. The Bank of Lancaster County demanded a complete accounting of the operations in
order to stave off a default on the notes and loans it was holding. We essentially revamped the
entire operation. Within 3 years, the company realized an increase in profits of 3 to 4 times its
previous years, and record revenues.

In 1991 I was elected to People to People International and the Citizen Ambassador Program,
which was founded by President Dwight D. Eisenhower in 1956. The program was founded to To
give specialists from throughout the world greater opportunities to work together and effectively
communicate with peers, The Citizen Ambassador program administers face-to-face scientific,
technical, and professional exchanges throughout the world. In 1961, under President John F.
Kennedy, the State Department established a non-profit private foundation to administer the
program. We were scheduled to tour the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe to discuss printing and
publishing technologies with scientists and technicians around the world.

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 10 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

In 1990 I had worked on developing voice recognition systems for the governments technology
think tank - NIST (National Institute for Standards & Technology). I co-authored the article
Escaping the Unix Tar Pit with a scientist from NIST that was published in the magazine DISC,
then one of the leading publications for the CD-ROM industry. Today, most all call centers deploy
that technology whenever you call an 800 number, and voice recognition is prevalent in all types
of applications involving telecommunications.

In 1989 I had founded Advanced Media Group, Ltd., and was one of only 5 or 6 U.S. domestic
companies that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's. We did business with commercial
companies, government agencies, educational institutions, and foreign companies. I performed
services and contracts for the Department of Defense, NASA, National Institution of Standards &
Technology (NIST), Department of Defense, The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
(DARPA), and the Defense Mapping Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, (CIA), IBM, Microsoft,
AMP, Commodore Computers, American Bankers Bond Buyers, and a host of others. I also was
working with R.R, Donnelly's Geo Systems, which was developing various interactive mapping
technologies, which is now a major asset of Map Quest. Map Quest is the premier provider of
mapping software and applications for the internet and is often used in delivering maps and
directions for Fortune 500 companies. We had arranged for High Industries to sell American Helix,
the manufacturer of compact discs, to R.R. Donnelly. We had brokered a deal and the executives
from Donnellys Chicago headquarters flew to Lancaster to discuss the deal and perform due
diligence of the manufacturing facility located in the Greenfield Industrial Park.

In 1987 Power Station Studios of New York and Tony Bongiovi retained me as executive
producer of a motion picture project. The theatrical and video release was to be delivered in a
digital format; the first of its kind. We had originated the marketing for the technology, and
created the concept for the Power Station Digital Movie System (PSDMS), which would follow the
copyright and marketing formula of the DOLBY technology trademark.

We had also created and developed marketing and patent research for the development and
commercialization of equipment that we intended to manufacture and market to the recording
industry featuring the digital technology. Sidel, Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot, P.C. of
Philadelphia was the lead patent law firm that We had retained for the project. Power Station
Studios was the brainchild of Tony Bongiovi, a leading engineering genius discovered by Motown
when he was 15. Tony and Power Station Studios was one of the leading recording studios in the
country, and were responsible for developing Bon Jovi, a cousin. Power Station Studios clients
included; Bruce Springsteen, Diana Ross, Cyndi Lauper, Talking Heads, Madonna, The Ramones,
Steve Winwood, and many others. Tony and Power Station Studios had produced the original
Sound Track for the original Star Wars motion picture. It was released for distribution and was
the number one Sound Track recording of its time.

Tony Bongiovi was also active in working and researching different aerospace technologies. * We
had developed and authored a Joint Venture Proposal for SONY to partner with us in delivering the
Digital Movie and its related technologies to the marketplace. The venture was to include the
commercialization of technologies, which Tony Bongiovi had developed for the recording industry
simultaneously with the release of the Digital Movie.

I also created the concept for the PSDMS trademark, which was to be the Trademark logo for the
technology, similar to the DOLBY sound systems trademark. The acronyms stand for the Power
Station Digital Movie System. Today, DVD is the mainstay for delivering digital movies on a
portable medium, a compact disc.

In 1987 I had a created and developed FMG Mortgage Banking, a company that was funded by a
major banking firm in Houston Texas. We had the capability to finance projects from $3 to $100
million dollars. Our terms and rates were so attractive that we had quickly received solicitations
from developers across the country. We were also very attractive to companies that wanted to
raise capital that include both debt and equity. Through my company, FMG, we could raise equity
funding through private placements, and debt funding through FMG Mortgage Banking. We were

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 11 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

retained by Gamillion Studios of Hollywood, California to secure financing of their postproduction


Film Studio that was looking to relocate to North Carolina. We had secured refinancing packages
for Norris Boyd of and the Olde Hickory and were in the midst of replacing the current loan that
was with Commonwealth National Bank. We had meetings and discussions with Drew Anton of the
Eden Resort, for refinancing a portion of his debt portfolio. We were quickly seeking commitments
for real estate deals from New York to California. We also had a number of other prominent local
developers seeking our competitive funding, including Owen Kugal, High Industries, and the Marty
Sponougle a partner of The Fisher Group (owner of the Rt. 30 Outlets). We were constantly told
that our financing packages were more competitive than local institutions.

In 1986 I had founded Financial Management Group, Ltd (FMG); a large financial services
organization comprised of a variety of professionals operating in one location. We had developed a
stock purchase program for where everyone had the opportunity for equity ownership in the new
firm. FMG had financial planners, investment managers, accountants, attorneys, realtors, liability
insurance services, tax preparers, and estate planners operating out of our corporate
headquarters in Lancaster. In one year, we had 24 people on staff, had approximately 12 offices in
Pennsylvania, and

several satellite offices in other states. We had in excess of $50 million under management, and
our advisors were generating almost $4 million of commissions, which did not include the fees
from the other professionals. We had acquired our own Broker Dealer firm and were valued at
about $3 to $4 million.

In 1985 I developed the Easter Regional Free Agent Camp, the first Free Agent Camp for the
Professional Football industry; which was videotaped for distribution to the teams scouting
departments. (See Washington Post page article of March 24, 1985) Current camps were
dependant on the team scouts to travel from state to state looking for recruits. We had developed
a strategy of video taping the camp and the distributing a copy, free of charge to the teams, to all
of the scouting departments for teams in all three leagues FL, CFL and WFL. My brother was
signed at that camp by the Ottawa Roughriders of the CFL, and went on to be a leading receiver
while J.C. Watts was one of the leagues most prominent quarterbacks. My brother also played 2
years with the Miami Dolphins while Dan Marino was starting quarterback. We were a Certified
Agent for the National Football League Players Association. Gene Upshaw, the President of the
NFLPA had given me some helpful hints for my camp, while we were at a Conference for agents of
the NFL. The Washington Post wrote a full-page article about our camp and associated it with
other camps that were questionable about their practices. Actually, that was the very reason for
our camp. We had attended many other camps around the country that were not very well
organized and attracted few if any scouts. We had about 60 participants, with one player coming
from as far away as Hawaii. We held the camp at Lancaster Catholic, with a professional
production company filming the entire camp, while I did the editing and produced the video. The
well respected and widely acclaimed professional football scout, Gil Brandt, of the Dallas Cowboys,
had given me support for my camp during some conversations We had with him and said he
looked forward to reviewing the tapes for any hopeful recruits.

In 1985 I was elected Vice President of the Central Pennsylvania Chapter of the International
Association of Financial Planners, and helped build that chapter by increasing membership 3to 4
times. We had personally retained the nationally acclaimed and nationally syndicated Financial
Planner, Ms. Alexandria Armstrong of Washington D.C.; to host a major fundraiser. More than 150
professionals attended the dinner event that was held at the Eden Resort & Conference Center.
Ms. Armstrong discussed financial planning and how all of the professions needed to work
together in order to be most effective for their clients. We attracted a wide variety of professionals
including; brokers, lawyers, accountants, realtors, tax specialists, estate planners, bankers, and
investment advisors. Today, it has become evident that financial planning was the way of the
future. In 1986 executives approached us from Blue Ball National Bank to help them develop a
Financial Planning department within their bank.

In 1984 I had helped to develop strategic planning for Sandy Weill, former President of Citi Group

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 12 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

(the largest banking entity in the U.S). We were one of several associates asked to help advise on
the future of Financial Planning and how it would impact the brokerage and the investment
industry at large. Mr. Weil was performing due diligence for the merger of American Express and
IDS (Investors Diversified Services). We were at that time a national leader in the company in
delivering Fee Based Financial Planning Services, which was a new concept in the investment
community and mainstream investors. That concept is now widely held by most investment
advisers.

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 13 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

THE COURTS AND THE UNITED STATES LEGAL SYSTEM

For 18 years, (from 1987 until 2005) it has always been fairly easy to keep these issues
from court dockets and judges. During these years Stan J. Caterbone had solicited at least twenty
attorneys, some from large firms with national recognition in their respective fields of specialties.
Attorneys from New York City to Santa Barbara and San Diego California were visited and
consulted as well as a group of ex FBI agents who specialized in white collar crime that are now
globally recognized. However, the money and influence of persons and entities that wanted these
issues silence always prevailed. The issues were so complex and convoluted, and involved such
high profile politicians and U.S. agencies, it was far easier to state that there was no case, or their
were no claims that would result in remedy or redress. Between the Republican Party and the
Department of Defense, the CIA and the NSA, there was not an attorney that could not be
influenced. The obstruction of justice and due process in this case is most likely unprecedented in
nature and in malice.

However in 2005 that all changed when Stan J. Caterbone appeared as a pro se litigant
representing himself, without any counsel, in the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. The Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or case no. 05-cv-
2288. This case is still not settled and has been withdrawn by plaintiff Stan J. Caterbone
in October of 2008 after a successful ruling in the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals
(07-4474) in September of 2008. The case will be continued upon the security of
evidence and the cease and desist of obstruction of justice and due process. On May 16,
2005 at the Federal Courthouse in Philadelphia, Stan J. Caterbone filed the case under seal. One
week later in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania in Reading,
Pennsylvania, again appearing as pro se, Stan J. Caterbone filed a petition for protection under
the Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Code, in case no. 05-23059.

These acts of entering the United States legal system with these issues triggered yet
another round of attempts to keep these cases from the courts and judges - Organized Stalking
with Directed Energy Devices and Weapons, built on a foundation of mental telepathy or total
Mind Control.

REMOTE VIEWING; ORGANIZED STALKING; DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND


WEAPONS.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of fraud
within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary person to
suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was being read, or
"remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only known to him, and
never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while soliciting the counsel of
Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie
Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote viewing through an email. That was
the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was researched, but that was the extent of the
topic. Remote Viewers may have attempted to connect in a more direct and continuous way
without success.

In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental telepathy;
synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy devices and weapons
that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the targeted victim. This assault was
no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the filing of the federal action in U.S. District
Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This assault began after
the handlers remotely trained Stan J. Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference
opposed to most other victims of this technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is connected 24/7 with
a person who declares that she is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of Kennett Missouri.
Stan J. Caterbone has spent 3 years trying to validate and confirm this person without success.
Most U.S. intelligence agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and
the U.S. Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached documents for more information.

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 14 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control program
labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group had to again return to local, state,
and federal courts. Again the obstruction of due process, the local gang stalking, torture, trespass,
thefts, and the like began in earnest. From the fabricated Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric
Commitment of April 2010 by Detective Clark Bearinger, until January of 2015, Stan J. Caterbone
and Advanced Media Group had been in seclusion and in a state of rehabilitation and rest due to
the forced medication by Fairmount Behavioral Hospital and Dr. Silvia Gratz. The psychotropic
drugs reduce your motor skills and put you in an extreme state of confusion. By the end of the
summer of 2010 every social media site, including the www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
website was taken off-line due to the intimidation and coercion by Detective Clark Bearinger.

In May Stan J. Caterbone had again endured the Attacks and Torture from the
employees of the Lancaster County Courthouse, and the Lancaster County Government Building.
Then soon after the Residents of Lancaster County engaged in a massive Organized Stalking
Campaign. In addition an extreme Computer Hacking Campaign was initiated and executed in
an effort to again SILENCE Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group. And Again, the
Lancaster City Police Department took the lead role. As usual Stan J. Caterbone summoned state
and federal authorities for help and assistance, including direct communications with the White
House, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and
Kathleen Kane, The Pennsylvania State Police, the Pennsylvania General Assembly, several U.S.
Congressmen, and of course the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office. Since August 1,
2015 the Geek Squad had performed diagnostics and repairs six (6) times due to computer
hacking. On at least 2 occasions the entire hard drive had to be wiped clean and restored.

On June 23, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone was named MOVANT in the 2014 Habeus
Corpus Petition by Lisa Michelle Lambert, Case No. 14:02559 in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania after filing an Amicus on the case. Judge Paul
Diamond was presiding since it's filing in 2014. However, the Petition was not able to
be granted and the case was stalled on jurisdictional law based on new and compelling
evidence, or lack there of. The Amicus was filed to cure that deficiency with direct
witness corroboration to the Prosecutorial Misconduct and Innocence of Lisa Michelle
Lambert. In fact a working theory was filed that suggested that the East Lampeter
Police Department engaged in a strategy of Entrapment that lead to the unfortunate
murder in 1991. This, would of course, allow a wrongful death claim to be filed by the
Show family. The case is now before the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 15-
3400. There are three (3) questions that the Third Circuit may rule on; whether to free
Lisa Michelle Lambert, or grant her her Habeus Corpus, and whether to grant Summary
Judgment to Stan J. Caterbone in all civil actions in both state and federal courts.

Two weeks later, on July 9, 2015, Detective Clark Bearinger filed another fabricated
Petition for Involuntary Psychiatric Commitment. And again Stan J. Caterbone endured 7 days in
the Fairmount Behavioral Hospital in Philadelphia. However, this time there was no MANDATORY
Treatment Program Ordered by the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. So Stan J.
Caterbone continued filing in the courts for assistance and resolution. In August, in a desperate
attempt to stop the local torture campaign, another Emergency Injunction was filed in the
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. On August 6, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone went so far as to
undertake a Professional Polygraph Test administered by Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions of
West Chester, Pennsylvania. The test ended up being 4 grueling hours of torture and a scam of
$600.00.

On July 9th , 2015 a Private Criminal Complaint was filed against Detective Clark Bearinger,
Officer Williams, Officer Binderup, and 2 unidentified patrolman. The Complaint contained
allegations of torture and abuse at every moment of contact. The Lancaster City Police

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 15 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Department were so desperate for retaliation from the Amicus filing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
case, that they actually broke the door in of 1250 Fremont Street in order to execute the
fabricated 302 petition. The Complaint was denied by the Lancaster County District Attorney on
August 8th . The Complaint is now under a Petition for Review by the Lancaster County Court of
Common Pleas.

On August 17, 2015 another Emergency Injunction for Relief was filed in the Lancaster
County Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 15-06985. The Injunction was heard by Judge Jeffrey
Wright, who dismissed it as frivolous. An appeal, MD 1561, is pending in the Superior Court of
Pennsylvania.

In addition, by September 26, 2015 Stan J. Caterbone had been granted Electronic Filing
Privileges in the local, state, and federal courts. This should alleviate the fraud and abuses of the
U.S. Postal Service and the computer hackers.

In 2015 Stan J. Caterbone identifies a trend that suggests that the Lancaster County
community-at-large was subject to either community targeting or community hypnosis. The
community targeting theory is supported by experts Jullianne McKinney, Cheryl Welsh, and Dr.
John Hall. The community hypnosis theory is supported by direct personal relationships with the
Amazing Kreskin, Samuel P. Caterbone and Stan J. Caterbone.

In September of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone begins to digitize a library of approximately 45


audio cassette tapes from his father, Samuel P. Caterbone. The tapes range in date from 1971 to
1996. The tapes prove an identical targeting campaign against both Samuel P. Caterbone and
Stan J. Caterbone. In addition the tapes confirm that Steven P. Caterbone, brother of Stan J.
Caterbone, was most likely a target dating back to the early 1960's. In addition, the death of
Samuel P. Caterbone on July 20, 2001 was confirmed to be that of murder, not natural causes.

In the early 1990's Dr. Phillip Caterbone, brother, had been solicited by the National
Institute of Health, or NIH in Washington, D.C., for a fellowship to research and catalog a study to
find a genetic marker for depression in the CATERBONE family. Phil interviewed all living
descendants and relatives of my father, Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., and took blood samples. I am
alleging that this was a deliberate act to continue the cover story of mental illness to distract and
provide plausible deniability for any linkage to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control.

WAS THE PLAINTIFF PLACED ON TERRORIST LIST BY HOMELAND SECURITY SECRETARY


TOM RIDGE IN 2004?
On March 8, 2016 I was illegally detained, handcuffed and interrogated by no less than
eight (8) National Security Agency Police in the barracks of Ft. Meade Maryland with no probable
cause for approximately 2 hours. My auto was searched and sniffed by the NSA CANINE UNIT. I
was interrogated about events from 1987 to the present involving my Whistleblowing activities,
my litigation, my mental health record and my intent on why I was traveling to Washington, D.C.
I was commanded not to continue on to Washington, D.C. And was commanded not to enter any
federally owned property again. I left the barracks and proceeded home to Lancaster, PA.
In July of 2005 at a military museum (Open to the Public) on a military base I was
detained and interrogated by two (2) Defense Intelligence Agents, or DIA of the Department of
Defense in Austin, Texas for about 1 hours for no probable cause. I was asked the same
questions as above and was not allowed to leave until the agents verified that I was staying with
my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone, who at the time resided in Austin, Texas. I was commanded not
to ever enter a military base again.
In January of 2006 I was detained and interrogated by Homeland Security in Houston
Airport upon the return from Puerto Vallarte, Mexico after being pulled from the line for allegedly
having plastic explosives in my back pack. Of course it was fabricated and I was allowed to
leave.

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 16 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

The Courts must consider UNJUST ENRICHMENT in this case. (Wikipedia, The Free
Dictionary by FARLEX) - A general equitable principle that no person should be allowed to profit at
another's expense without making restitution for the reasonable value of any property, services,
or other benefits that have been unfairly received and retained. Although the unjust enrichment
doctrine is sometimes referred to as a quasi-contractual remedy, unjust enrichment is not based
on an express contract. Instead, litigants normally resort to the remedy of unjust enrichment
when they have no written or verbal contract to support their claim for relief. In such instances
litigants ask a court to find a contractual relationship that is implied in law, a fictitious relationship
created by courts to do justice in a particular case.

Targeted Individuals - An Overview (Taken from the following website)


http://targetedindividual.blogspot.com/

Essentially, a targeted individual has officially been declared an "enemy of the State". Your
unrelenting harassment has now entered an entirely new phase. From what was once State and
most likely federal law enforcement surveillance (for whatever reason) has now graduated to a
little-known CIA / U.S. military psychological harassment & physical torture campaign that is so
extensive and seemingly so absurd to the average American citizen, you will almost certainly be
labeled as having a mental illness and/or paranoia just for simply describing what has now
become your daily reality. The only other people that truly understand the extent of the
harassment & torture are fellow targeted individuals who have also been experiencing similar
violations of their civil, constitutional and basic human rights.

"I'm being followed everywhere I go", "it seems like they are everywhere", "it's like they
can read my mind and know where I'll be"...these are the types of statements, that while actually
quite accurate (keep reading), can easily make a targeted individual appear to have lost their
mind. In order for it to make more sense, let's once again review who is now orchestrating this
abuse against a targeted individual. Our military (essentially our international police force) and
our intelligence community are in control. This harassment campaign has reached the highest
levels of our government and as such, the resources at their disposable are truly unimaginable. Is
it just the military perpetrating this harassment campaign? Of course NOT! They have simply been
handed control. What this means for a targeted individual is that EVERY law enforcement tool
available from your local community watch, community organizations (ie Freemasons) and
"concerned citizen" types all the way up through Homeland Security including the U.S. military
have placed YOU in their cross hairs. If you are a targeted individual your conversations are being
monitored (whether inside your home, your car, your office, and obviously your telephone), your
movements and actions are constantly being monitored (whether inside your home or out in
public), your electronic correspondence is being monitored (email, websites you visit, letters you
write on your computer, etc) - you are being WATCHED! 24/7/365. Again, this isn't your local
Sheriff sitting in an "unmarked" patrol car eating his donut on a stakeout. A targeted individual
has every known (AND classified) technology being deployed, and most likely TESTED, against
them. Understand it and deal with it in a logical and sensible manner. I don't mean to alarm you,
but this is the unfortunate reality that any targeted individual now finds them self in. Maybe it's a
little clearer now HOW "they" can be everywhere you go and seem to be able to "read your mind".
Targeted individuals are not crazy - but be very careful...the perception of mental illness is one of
the many traps a program like this was designed to create. If not the actual illness itself.

So, besides an absolute abomination of a targeted individuals right to privacy, what other
tactics are being deployed against a targeted individual. The hardest to prove and the most
criminal tactic used (especially when a target has 3 young & developing children in the home such
as myself) is a continuous poisoning and torture of the target by invisible directed electromagnetic
radiation. If this is a new topic to you, it may be unclear exactly what electromagnetic radiation
(EMR) is. After all, it's not exactly the kind of topic an average American is thinking about. Well, to
name a few examples, electromagnetic radiation ranges from radio frequency waves (RF) to the
more destructive & potentially deadly ionizing forms of x-rays and gamma rays. In the lower to
mid spectrum there are also radar waves, microwaves, ultraviolet and infrared light waves.

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 17 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

What I noticed when this harassment campaign began for myself toward the end of 2005
was the continuous jet plane(s) that suddenly began flying "holding patterns" for extended
periods of time above & around my home. My theory is that these planes are equipped with
sophisticated radar imaging technology. Possibly very high powered infrared imaging cameras as
well. Rather than using these electromagnetic radiation devices to "search" for something, in the
case of a targeted individual these devices are used to slowly poison and "overload" the targeted
individual with continuous high doses of directed electromagnetic radiation. Once a targeted
individuals body has been properly overexposed over a period of time (months), other portable
devices may then be used to keep a target in a constant state of agitation and dis-ease. And for
the more fragile among us, maybe even death! This tactic can be the premier form of making a
target seem crazy by forcing them to report what appear to be insane accusations against
neighbors, the people "following them everywhere", planes over their home and the government.
Another obvious reason for deploying this invisible & silent torture tactic is to provoke a targeted
individual to lash out in sheer frustration and anger against the closest person (who most likely
has absolutely nothing to do with the ongoing abuse). Essentially, this is the ultimate version of
entrapment. And may even be the ultimate, basically unprovable form of a state-sanctioned
murder!

COINTELPRO
COINTELPRO (a portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of
covert, and at times illegal,[1][2] projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political
organizations.[3]
FBI records show that COINTELPRO resources targeted groups and individuals that the FBI
deemed subversive,[4] including anti-Vietnam War organizers, activists of the Civil Rights
Movement or Black Power movement (e.g., Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Black Panther Party),
feminist organizations, anti-colonial movements (such as Puerto Rican independence groups like
the Young Lords), and a variety of organizations that were part of the broader New Left.

FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover issued directives governing COINTELPRO, ordering FBI agents
to "expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, neutralize or otherwise eliminate" the activities of these
movements and especially their leaders.[5][6] Under Hoover, the agent in charge of COINTELPRO
was William C. Sullivan.[7] Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy personally authorized some of
these programs.[8] Although Kennedy only gave written approval for limited wiretapping of King's
phones "on a trial basis, for a month or so",[9] Hoover extended the clearance so his men were
"unshackled" to look for evidence in any areas of King's life they deemed worthy.[10]

The History of COINTELPRO


Centralized operations under COINTELPRO officially began in August 1956 with a program
designed to "increase factionalism, cause disruption and win defections" inside the Communist
Party U.S.A. (CPUSA). Tactics included anonymous phone calls, IRS audits, and the creation of
documents that would divide the American communist organization internally.[11] An October
1956 memo from Hoover reclassified the FBI's ongoing surveillance of black leaders, including it
within COINTELPRO, with the justification that the movement was infiltrated by communists.[12]
In 1956, Hoover sent an open letter denouncing Dr. T.R.M. Howard, a civil rights leader, surgeon,
and wealthy entrepreneur in Mississippi who had criticized FBI inaction in solving recent murders
of George W. Lee, Emmett Till, and other blacks in the South.[13] When the Southern Christian
Leadership Conference (SCLC) was founded in 1957, the FBI began to monitor and target the
group almost immediately, focusing particularly on Bayard Rustin, Stanley Levison, and,
eventually, Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.[14]

After the 1963 March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom, Hoover singled out King as a
major target for COINTELPRO. Under pressure from Hoover to focus on King, Sullivan wrote:

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 18 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

In the light of King's powerful demagogic speech. ... We must mark him now, if we have
not done so before, as the most dangerous Negro of the future in this nation from the standpoint
of communism, the Negro, and national security.[16]

Soon after, the FBI was systematically bugging King's home and his hotel rooms, as they
now were aware that King was growing in stature daily as the leader among leaders of the Negro
movement.[17]

In the mid-1960s, King began publicly criticizing the Bureau for giving insufficient attention
to the use of terrorism by white supremacists. Hoover responded by publicly calling King the most
"notorious liar" in the United States.[18] In his 1991 memoir, Washington Post journalist Carl
Rowan asserted that the FBI had sent at least one anonymous letter to King encouraging him to
commit suicide.[19] Historian Taylor Branch documents an anonymous November 21, 1964
"suicide package" sent by the FBI that contained audio recordings of King's sexual indiscretions
combined with a letter telling him "There is only one way out for you. You better take it before
your filthy, abnormal, fraudulent self is bared to the nation." And even by 1969, as has been
noted elsewhere, "[FBI] efforts to 'expose' Martin Luther King, Jr. had not slackened even though
King had been dead for a year. [The Bureau] furnished ammunition to conservatives to attack
King's memory, and...tried to block efforts to honor the slain leader." [20]

During the same period the program also targeted Malcolm X. While an FBI spokesman has
denied that the FBI was "directly" involved in Malcolm's murder, it is documented that the Bureau
worked to "widen the rift" between Malcolm and Elijah Muhammad through infiltration and the
"sparking of acrimonious debates within the organization," rumor-mongering, and other tactics
designed to foster internal disputes; which ultimately led to Malcolm's assassination.[21][22] The
FBI heavily infiltrated Malcolm's Organization of Afro-American Unity in the final months of
his life. The Pulitzer Prize-winning biography of Malcolm X by Manning Marable asserts that most
of the men who plotted Malcolm's assassination were never apprehended and that the full extent
of the FBI's involvement in his death cannot be known.[23][24]

Amidst the urban unrest of JulyAugust 1967, the FBI began "COINTELPROBLACK HATE",
which focused on King and the SCLC as well as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee
(SNCC), the Revolutionary Action Movement (RAM), the Deacons for Defense and Justice,
Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), and the Nation of Islam.[25] BLACK HATE established the
Ghetto Informant Program and instructed 23 FBI offices to "disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or
otherwise neutralize the activities of black nationalist hate type organizations".[26]

A March 1968 memo stated the program's goal was to "prevent the coalition of militant
black nationalist groups" ; to "Prevent the RISE OF A 'MESSIAH' who could unify...the militant
black nationalist movement" ; "to pinpoint potential troublemakers and neutralize them before
they exercise their potential for violence [against authorities]." ; to "Prevent militant black
nationalist groups and leaders from gaining RESPECTABILITY, by discrediting them to...both the
responsible community and to liberals who have vestiges of sympathy..."; and to "prevent the
long-range GROWTH of militant black organizations, especially among youth." Dr. King was said to
have potential to be the "messiah" figure, should he abandon nonviolence and integrationism;[27]
Stokely Carmichael was noted to have "the necessary charisma to be a real threat in this way;" as
he was seen as someone who espoused a much more militant vision of "black power."[28]

This program coincided with a broader federal effort to prepare military responses for
urban riots, and began increased collaboration between the FBI, Central Intelligence Agency,
National Security Agency, and the Department of Defense. The CIA launched its own domestic
espionage project in 1967 called Operation CHAOS.[29] A particular target was the Poor People's
Campaign, a national effort organized by King and the SCLC to occupy Washington, D.C. The FBI
monitored and disrupted the campaign on a national level, while using targeted smear tactics
locally to undermine support for the march.[30]

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 19 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Overall, COINTELPRO encompassed disruption and sabotage of the Socialist Workers Party
(1961), the Ku Klux Klan (1964), the Nation of Islam, the Black Panther Party (1967), and the
entire New Left social/political movement, which included antiwar, community, and religious
groups (1968). A later investigation by the Senate's Church Committee (see below) stated that
"COINTELPRO began in 1956, in part because of frustration with Supreme Court rulings limiting
the Government's power to proceed overtly against dissident groups ..."[31] Official congressional
committees and several court cases[32] have concluded that COINTELPRO operations against
communist and socialist groups exceeded statutory limits on FBI activity and violated
constitutional guarantees of freedom of speech and association.[1]

The COINTELPRO Program Exposed

The building broken into by the Citizen's Commission to Investigate the FBI, at One
Veterans Square, Media, Pennsylvania

The program was successfully kept secret until 1971, when the Citizens' Commission to
Investigate the FBI burgled an FBI field office in Media, Pennsylvania, took several dossiers, and
exposed the program by passing this material to news agencies.[33] Many news organizations
initially refused to publish the information. Within the year, Director J. Edgar Hoover declared that
the centralized COINTELPRO was over, and that all future counterintelligence operations would be
handled on a case-by-case basis.[34][35]

Additional documents were revealed in the course of separate lawsuits filed against the FBI
by NBC correspondent Carl Stern, the Socialist Workers Party, and a number of other groups. In
1976 the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence
Activities of the United States Senate, commonly referred to as the "Church Committee" for its
chairman, Senator Frank Church of Idaho, launched a major investigation of the FBI and
COINTELPRO. Journalists and historians speculate that the government has not released many
dossier and documents related to the program. Many released documents have been partly, or
entirely, redacted.

The Final Report of the Select Committee castigated conduct of the intelligence community
in its domestic operations (including COINTELPRO) in no uncertain terms:

The Committee finds that the domestic activities of the intelligence community at times
violated specific statutory prohibitions and infringed the constitutional rights of American citizens.
The legal questions involved in intelligence programs were often not considered. On other
occasions, they were intentionally disregarded in the belief that because the programs served the
"national security" the law did not apply. While intelligence officers on occasion failed to disclose to
their superiors programs which were illegal or of questionable legality, the Committee finds that
the most serious breaches of duty were those of senior officials, who were responsible for
controlling intelligence activities and generally failed to assure compliance with the law.[1] Many
of the techniques used would be intolerable in a democratic society even if all of the targets had
been involved in violent activity, but COINTELPRO went far beyond that ... the Bureau conducted a
sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of First Amendment
rights of speech and association, on the theory that preventing the growth of dangerous groups
and the propagation of dangerous ideas would protect the national security and deter violence.
[31]

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 20 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Range of targets
At its inception, the program's main target was the Communist Party.[36] According to the Church
Committee:

While the declared purposes of these programs were to protect the "national security" or
prevent violence, Bureau witnesses admit that many of the targets were nonviolent and
most had no connections with a foreign power. Indeed, nonviolent organizations and
individuals were targeted because the Bureau believed they represented a "potential" for
violenceand nonviolent citizens who were against the war in Vietnam were targeted
because they gave "aid and comfort" to violent demonstrators by lending respectability to
their cause.
The imprecision of the targeting is demonstrated by the inability of the Bureau to define
the subjects of the programs. The Black Nationalist program, according to its supervisor,
included "a great number of organizations that you might not today characterize as black
nationalist but which were in fact primarily black." Thus, the nonviolent Southern Christian
Leadership Conference was labeled as a Black Nationalist-"Hate Group."
Furthermore, the actual targets were chosen from a far broader group than the titles of the
programs would imply. The CPUSA program targeted not only Communist Party members
but also sponsors of the National Committee to Abolish the House Un-American Activities
Committee and civil rights leaders allegedly under Communist influence or deemed to be
not sufficiently "anti-Communist". The Socialist Workers Party program included non-SWP
sponsors of anti-war demonstrations which were cosponsored by the SWP or the Young
Socialist Alliance, its youth group. The Black Nationalist program targeted a range of
organizations from the Panthers to SNCC to the peaceful Southern Christian Leadership
Conference, and included every Black Student Union and many other black student groups.
New Left targets ranged from the SDS to the InterUniversity Committee for Debate on
Foreign Policy, from Antioch College ("vanguard of the New Left") to the New Mexico Free
University and other "alternate" schools, and from underground newspapers to students'
protesting university censorship of a student publication by carrying signs with four-letter
words on them.

Examples of surveillance, spanning all presidents from FDR to Nixon, both legal and illegal,
contained in the Church Committee report:[37]
7. President Roosevelt asked the FBI to put in its files the names of citizens sending telegrams
to the White House opposing his "national defense" policy and supporting Col. Charles
Lindbergh.
8. President Truman received inside information on a former Roosevelt aide's efforts to
influence his appointments, labor union negotiating plans, and the publishing plans of
journalists.
9. President Eisenhower received reports on purely political and social contacts with foreign
officials by Bernard Baruch, Eleanor Roosevelt, and Supreme Court Justice William O.
Douglas.
10. The Kennedy administration had the FBI wiretap a congressional staff member,
three executive officials, a lobbyist, and a Washington law firm. US Attorney General Robert
F. Kennedy received the fruits of an FBI wire tap on Martin Luther King, Jr. and an
electronic listening device targeting a congressman, both of which yielded information of a
political nature.
11. President Johnson asked the FBI to conduct "name checks" of his critics and
members of the staff of his 1964 opponent, Senator Barry Goldwater. He also requested

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 21 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

purely political intelligence on his critics in the Senate, and received extensive intelligence
reports on political activity at the 1964 Democratic Convention from FBI electronic
surveillance.
12. President Nixon authorized a program of wiretaps which produced for the White
House purely political or personal information unrelated to national security, including
information about a Supreme Court Justice.

Groups that were known to be targets of COINTELPRO operations include

communist and socialist organizations


organizations and individuals associated with the Civil Rights Movement, including Rev. Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr. and others associated with the Southern Christian Leadership
Conference, the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, the Congress
of Racial Equality, and other civil rights organizations
black nationalist groups
the Young Lords
the American Indian Movement
the white supremacist groups
the Ku Klux Klan
the National States' Rights Party
a broad range of organizations labeled "New Left", including Students for a Democratic
Society and the Weathermen
almost all groups protesting the Vietnam War, as well as individual student demonstrators
with no group affiliation
the National Lawyers Guild
organizations and individuals associated with the women's rights movement
nationalist groups such as those seeking independence for Puerto Rico, United Ireland, and
Cuban exile movements including Orlando Bosch's Cuban Power and the Cuban Nationalist
Movement;
2nd additional notable Americans.[38]
The COINTELPRO documents show numerous cases of the FBI's intentions to prevent and
disrupt protests against the Vietnam War. Many techniques were used to accomplish this task.
"These included promoting splits among antiwar forces, encouraging red-baiting of socialists, and
pushing violent confrontations as an alternative to massive, peaceful demonstrations." One 1966
COINTELPRO operation tried to redirect the Socialist Workers Party from their pledge of support
for the antiwar movement.[39]

Methods

Body of Fred Hampton, national spokesman for the Black Panther Party, who was
murdered[40][41] by members of the Chicago Police Department, as part of a
COINTELPRO operation.[42][43]

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 22 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

According to attorney Brian Glick in his book War at Home, the FBI used four main methods
during COINTELPRO:

Infiltration: Agents and informers did not merely spy on political activists. Their main
purpose was to discredit and disrupt. Their very presence served to undermine trust and
scare off potential supporters. The FBI and police exploited this fear to smear genuine
activists as agents.
Psychological warfare: The FBI and police used myriad "dirty tricks" to undermine
progressive movements. They planted false media stories and published bogus leaflets and
other publications in the name of targeted groups. They forged correspondence, sent
anonymous letters, and made anonymous telephone calls. They spread misinformation
about meetings and events, set up pseudo movement groups run by government agents,
and manipulated or strong-armed parents, employers, landlords, school officials and others
to cause trouble for activists. They used bad-jacketing to create suspicion about targeted
activists, sometimes with lethal consequences.[44]
Harassment via the legal system: The FBI and police abused the legal system to harass
dissidents and make them appear to be criminals. Officers of the law gave perjured
testimony and presented fabricated evidence as a pretext for false arrests and wrongful
imprisonment. They discriminatorily enforced tax laws and other government regulations
and used conspicuous surveillance, "investigative" interviews, and grand jury subpoenas in
an effort to intimidate activists and silence their supporters.[42][45]
Illegal force: The FBI conspired with local police departments to threaten dissidents; to
conduct illegal break-ins in order to search dissident homes; and to commit vandalism,
assaults, beatings and assassinations.[42] The object was to frighten or eliminate
dissidents and disrupt their movements.

The FBI specifically developed tactics intended to heighten tension and hostility between
various factions in the black militancy movement, for example between the Black Panthers, the US
Organization, and the Blackstone Rangers. This resulted in numerous deaths, among which were
San Diego Black Panther Party members John Huggins, Bunchy Carter and Sylvester Bell.[42]

Dhoruba Bin Wahad a former Black Panther, reflects on how these tactics made him feel,
saying he had a combat mentality and felt like he was at war with the government. When asked
about why he thinks the Black Panthers were targeted he said, "In the United States, the
equivalent of the military was the local police. During the early sixties, at the height of the Civil
Rights Movement, and the human rights movement, the police in the United States became
increasingly militaristic. They began to train out of military bases in the United States. The Law
Enforcement Assistance Act (LEAA) supplied local police with military technology, everything from
assault rifles to army personnel carriers. In his opinion, the Counterintelligence Program went
hand-in-hand with the militarization of the police in the Black community, with the militarization of
police in America."[46]

The FBI also conspired with the police departments of many U.S. cities (San Diego, Los
Angeles, San Francisco, Oakland, Philadelphia, Chicago) to encourage repeated raids on Black
Panther homesoften with little or no evidence of violations of federal, state, or local lawswhich
resulted directly in the police killing many members of the Black Panther Party, most notably
Chicago Black Panther Party Chairman Fred Hampton on December 4, 1969.[42][43][47]

In order to eliminate black militant leaders whom they considered dangerous, the FBI is
believed to have worked with local police departments to target specific individuals,[48] accuse
them of crimes they did not commit, suppress exculpatory evidence and falsely incarcerate them.
Elmer "Geronimo" Pratt, a Black Panther Party leader, was incarcerated for 27 years before a
California Superior Court vacated his murder conviction, ultimately freeing him. Appearing before
the court, an FBI agent testified that he believed Pratt had been framed, because both the FBI

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 23 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

and the Los Angeles Police Department knew he had not been in the area at the time the murder
occurred.[49][50]

Some sources claim that the FBI conducted more than 200 "black bag jobs",[51][52] which
were warrantless surreptitious entries, against the targeted groups and their members.[53]

J. Edgar Hoover

In 1969 the FBI special agent in San Francisco wrote Hoover that his investigation of the
Black Panther Party (BPP) had concluded that in his city, at least, the Panthers were primarily
engaged in feeding breakfast to children. Hoover fired back a memo implying the agent's career
goals would be directly affected by his supplying evidence to support Hoover's view that the BPP
was "a violence-prone organization seeking to overthrow the Government by revolutionary
means".[54]

Hoover supported using false claims to attack his political enemies. In one memo he wrote:
"Purpose of counterintelligence action is to disrupt the BPP and it is immaterial whether facts exist
to substantiate the charge."[55]

In one particularly controversial 1965 incident, white civil rights worker Viola Liuzzo was
murdered by Ku Klux Klansmen, who gave chase and fired shots into her car after noticing that
her passenger was a young black man; one of the Klansmen was Gary Thomas Rowe, an
acknowledged FBI informant.[56][57] The FBI spread rumors that Liuzzo was a member of the
Communist Party and had abandoned her children to have sexual relationships with African
Americans involved in the Civil Rights Movement.[58][59] FBI records show that J. Edgar Hoover
personally communicated these insinuations to President Johnson.[60][61] FBI informant Rowe
has also been implicated in some of the most violent crimes of the 1960s civil rights era, including
attacks on the Freedom Riders and the 1963 Birmingham, Alabama 16th Street Baptist Church
bombing.[56] According to Noam Chomsky, in another instance in San Diego, the FBI financed,
armed, and controlled an extreme right-wing group of former Minutemen, transforming it into a
group called the Secret Army Organization that targeted groups, activists, and leaders involved in
the Anti-War Movement, using both intimidation and violent acts.[62][63][64]

Hoover ordered preemptive action "to pinpoint potential troublemakers and neutralize them
before they exercise their potential for violence."[5]

Illegal surveillance

The final report of the Church Committee concluded:

Too many people have been spied upon by too many Government agencies and too much
information has been illegally collected. The Government has often undertaken the secret
surveillance of citizens on the basis of their political beliefs, even when those beliefs posed
no threat of violence or illegal acts on behalf of a hostile foreign power. The Government,
operating primarily through secret and biased informants, but also using other intrusive
techniques such as wiretaps, microphone "bugs", surreptitious mail opening, and break-ins,
has swept in vast amounts of information about the personal lives, views, and associations
of American citizens. Investigations of groups deemed potentially dangerousand even of
groups suspected of associating with potentially dangerous organizationshave continued
for decades, despite the fact that those groups did not engage in unlawful activity.

Groups and individuals have been assaulted, repressed, harassed and disrupted because of
their political views, social beliefs and their lifestyles. Investigations have been based upon
vague standards whose breadth made excessive collection inevitable. Unsavory, harmful
and vicious tactics have been employedincluding anonymous attempts to break up

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 24 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

marriages, disrupt meetings, ostracize persons from their professions, and provoke target
groups into rivalries that might result in deaths. Intelligence agencies have served the
political and personal objectives of presidents and other high officials. While the agencies
often committed excesses in response to pressure from high officials in the Executive
branch and Congress, they also occasionally initiated improper activities and then
concealed them from officials whom they had a duty to inform.

Governmental officialsincluding those whose principal duty is to enforce the lawhave


violated or ignored the law over long periods of time and have advocated and defended
their right to break the law.

The Constitutional system of checks and balances has not adequately controlled
intelligence activities. Until recently the Executive branch has neither delineated the scope
of permissible activities nor established procedures for supervising intelligence agencies.
Congress has failed to exercise sufficient oversight, seldom questioning the use to which its
appropriations were being put. Most domestic intelligence issues have not reached the
courts, and in those cases when they have reached the courts, the judiciary has been
reluctant to grapple with them.[65][66]

Post-COINTELPRO operations

While COINTELPRO was officially terminated in April 1971, critics allege that continuing FBI
actions indicate that post-COINTELPRO reforms did not succeed in ending COINTELPRO tactics.
[67][68][69] Documents released under the FOIA show that the FBI tracked the late David
Halberstama Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and authorfor more than two decades.[70]
"Counterterrorism" guidelines implemented during the Reagan administration have been described
as allowing a return to COINTELPRO tactics.[71][pages needed] Some radical groups accuse
factional opponents of being FBI informants or assume the FBI is infiltrating the movement.[72]

The IG report found these "troubling" FBI practices between 2001 and 2006. In some
cases, the FBI conducted investigations of people affiliated with activist groups for "factually
weak" reasons. Also, the FBI extended investigations of some of the groups "without adequate
basis" and improperly kept information about activist groups in its files. The IG report also found
that FBI Director Robert Mueller III provided inaccurate congressional testimony about one of the
investigations, but this inaccuracy may have been due to his relying on what FBI officials told him.
[73]

Several authors have accused the FBI of continuing to deploy COINTELPRO-like tactics
against radical groups after the official COINTELPRO operations were ended. Several authors have
suggested the American Indian Movement (AIM) has been a target of these operations.

Authors such as Ward Churchill, Rex Weyler, and Peter Matthiessen allege that the federal
government intended to acquire uranium deposits on the Lakota tribe's reservation land, and that
this motivated a larger government conspiracy against AIM activists on the Pine Ridge reservation.
[74][75][76][77][78] Others believe COINTELPRO continues and similar actions are being taken
against activist groups.[78][79][80] Caroline Woidat says that, with respect to Native Americans,
COINTELPRO should be understood within a historical context in which "Native Americans have
been viewed and have viewed the world themselves through the lens of conspiracy theory."[81]
Other authors argue that while some conspiracy theories related to COINTELPRO are unfounded,
the issue of ongoing government surveillance and repression is real.[82][83]

References

1. "I. Introduction and Summary" (PDF). Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans -
Church Committee final report. United States Senate website. II. United States

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 25 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Government. 1976-04-26. p. 10. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2014-04-18.


Retrieved 2014-07-15.
Wolf, Paul. "COINTELPRO: The Untold American Story". Archive.org. World Conference
Against Racism, Durbin SA.
Jalon, Allan M. (2006-03-08). "A break-in to end all break-ins; In 1971, stolen FBI files
exposed the government's domestic spying program.". Los Angeles Times. Tribune
Company. Archived from the original on 2013-12-03. Retrieved 2014-07-15.
Jeffreys-Jones, Rhodri (208). The FBI. Yale University Press. p. 189.
ISBN 9780300142846.
COINTELPRO Revisited - Spying & Disruption - IN BLACK AND WHITE: THE F.B.I. PAPERS
"A Huey P. Newton Story - Actions - COINTELPRO". PBS. Archived from the original on
2010-11-18. Retrieved 2008-06-23.
Weiner, Tim (2012). Enemies : A History of the FBI (1st ed.). New York: Random House.
ISBN 9781400067480., p. 196. "Sullivan would become Hoover's field marshal in matters
of national security, chief of FBI intelligence, and commandant of COINTELPRO. In that top
secret and tightly compartmentalized world, an FBI inside of the FBI, Sullivan served as the
executor of Hoover's most clandestine and recondite demands."
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 233. "RFK knew much more about this surveillance than he
ever admitted. He personally renewed his authorization for the taps on Levison's office,
and he approved Hoover's request to tap Levison's home telephone, where King called late
at night several times a week."

Herst, Burton (2007) Bobby and J. Edgar, p. 372.


Herst (2007), pp. 372374
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 195
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 198. "On October 2, 1956, Hoover stepped up the FBI's long-
standing surveillance of black civil rights activists. He sent a COINTELPRO memo to the
field, warning that the Communist Party was seeking to infiltrate the movement."
David T. Beito and Linda Royster Beito, Black Maverick: T.R.M. Howard's Fight for Civil
Rights and Economic Power (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 2009), 148, 15459.
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 200.
Gage, Beverly (2014-11-11). "What an Uncensored Letter to M.L.K. Reveals". The New
York Times. Retrieved 2015-01-09.
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 235.
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 236. "The bugs got quick results. When King traveled, as he
did constantly in the ensuing weeks, to Washington, Milwaukee, Los Angeles, and Honolulu,
the Bureau planted hidden microphones in his hotel rooms. The FBI placed a total of eight
wiretaps and sixteen bugs on King."
Taylor Branch, Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963-1965 (Simon & Schuster,
1999), p. 524-529
Adams, Cecil M. (2003-05-02). "Was Martin Luther King, Jr. a plagiarist?". Washington
Post. Retrieved 2006-06-06.
Taylor Branch, Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963-1965 (Simon & Schuster,
1999) p. 527-529
Taylor Branch, Pillar of Fire: America in the King Years 1963-1965 (Simon & Schuster,
1999), p. 243
Gregory Kane, "FBI should acknowledge complicity in the assassination of Malcolm X" The

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 26 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Baltimore Sun, May 14, 2000


Toure "Malcolm X: Criminal, Minister, Humanist, Martyr" The New York Times, June 17,
2011
James W. Douglass "The Converging Martyrdom of Malcolm and Martin" Dr. Martin Luther
King Jr. Lecture, Princeton Theological Seminary, March 29, 2006
"Guide to the Microfilm Edition of FBI Surveillance Files: Black Extremist Organizations,
Part 1" Lexis-Nexis
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 271.
"The FBI Sets Goals for COINTELPRO" American Social History Project, City University of
New York
Rob Warden "Hoover Rated Carmichael As 'Black Messiah'" Chicago Daily News, Feb 10,
1976
Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 272. "Some 1,500 army intelligence officers in civilian clothing
undertook the surveillance of some 100,000 American citizens. Army intelligence shared all
their reports over the next three years. The CIA tracked antiwar leaders and black militants
who traveled overseas, and it reported back to the FBI. The FBI, in turn, shared thousands
of selected files on Americans with army intelligence and the CIA. All three intelligence
services sent the names of Americans to the National Security Agency for inclusion on a
global watch list; the NSA relayed back to the FBI hundreds of transcripts of intercepted
telephone calls to and from suspect Americans."
McKnight, Last Crusade, pp. 2628. "By March the Hoover Bureau's campaign against King
was virtually on a total war footing. In a March 21 'urgent' teletype, Hoover urged all field
offices involved in the POCAM project to exploit every tactic in the bureau's arsenal of
covert political warfare to bring down King and the SCLC."
"Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of
Americans". United States Senate. Retrieved 2010-12-01.
See, for example, Hobson v. Wilson, 737 F.2d 1 (1984); Rugiero v. U.S. Dept. of Justice,
257 F.3d 534, 546 (2001).[dead link]
http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/1971/
"A Short History of FBI COINTELPRO", Albion Monitor, Retrieved July 13, 2007. Archived
September 28, 2007, at the Wayback Machine.

Weiner, Enemies (2012), p. 293


The COINTELPRO Papers - Documents from the FBI's Secret Wars Against Dissent in the
United States by Ward Churchill & Jim Vander Wall. South End Press.
Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans, Final Report of the Senate Committee
to Study Governmental Operations with respect to Intelligence Activities
Various Church Committee reports reproduced online at ICDC: Final Report, 2A; Final
Report,2Cb; Final Report, 3A; Final Report, 3G. Various COINTELPRO documents
reproduced online at ICDC: CPUSA; SWP; Black Nationalist; White Hate; New Left; Puerto
Rico. Archived January 13, 2013, at the Wayback Machine.
Blackstock, Nelson. COINTELPRO: The FBI's Secret War on Political Freedom, Pathfinder,
New York. 1975. p. 111.
Michael Newton. Famous Assassinations in World History: An Encyclopedia. ABC-CLIO, p.
205. ISBN 1610692853
THE CHICAGO CRIME SCENES PROJECT: FRED HAMPTON
The FBI'S Covert Action Program to Destroy the Black Panther Party

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 27 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

FBI Secrets: An Agent's Expose. M. Wesley Swearingen. Boston. South End Press. 1995.
Special Agent Gregg York: "We expected about twenty Panthers to be in the apartment
when the police raided the place. Only two of those black nigger fuckers were killed, Fred
Hampton and Mark Clark."
Ward Churchill (2002), Agents of Repression (Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars
Against the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement ed.), South End Press,
ISBN 978-0896086463, OCLC 50985124, 0896086461
"Final Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to
Intelligence Activities-Book III" [The Church Report], US Senate, 1976
Bin Wahad, Dhoruba. Still Black, Still Strong. Semiotext, 1993, pp. 18-19
Brown, Elaine. A Taste of Power: A Black Woman's Story. New York: Doubleday, 1992, pp.
204-06
Paul Wolf, "COINTELPRO", ICDC
"Former Black Panther freed after 27 years in jail". CNN. Archived from the original on
2010-11-18. Retrieved April 30, 2010.
In re Pratt, 82 Cal

Alexander Cockburn; Jeffrey St. Clair (1998). Whiteout: The CIA, Drugs and the Press.
Verso. p. 69. ISBN 978-1-85984-139-6.
FBI document, 19 July 1966, DeLoach to Sullivan re: "Black Bag" Jobs.

[1]
FBI document, 27 May 1969, "Director FBI to SAC San Francisco", available at the FBI
reading room.

FBI document, 16 September 1970, Director FBI to SAC's in Baltimore, Detroit, Los
Angeles, New Haven, San Francisco, and Washington Field Office. Available at the FBI
reading room.
Gary May, The Informant: The FBI, the Ku Klux Klan, and the Murder of Viola Luzzo, Yale
University Press, 2005.
"Jonathan Yardley". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 2010-11-18.
Retrieved April 30, 2010.
Joanne Giannino. "Viola Liuzzo". Dictionary of Unitarian & Universalist Biography. Archived
from the original on 2010-11-18. Retrieved 2008-09-29.
Kay Houston. "The Detroit housewife who moved a nation toward racial justice". The
Detroit News, Rearview Mirror. Archived from the original on 1999-04-27.
"Uncommon Courage: The Viola Liuzzo Story". Archived from the original on 2007-08-13.
Mary Stanton (2000). From Selma to Sorrow: The Life and Death of Viola Liuzzo.
University of Georgia Press. p. 190.
Noam Chomsky, "Triumphs of Democracy", Excerpted from Language and Responsibility
Watergate and the Secret Army Organization - msg#00404 - culture.discuss.cia-drugs
1972
"Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans Book II, Final Report of the Select
Committee to Study Governmental Operations with respect to Intelligence Activities United
States Senate (Church Committee)". United States Senate. Retrieved May 11, 2006.
"Tapped Out Why Congress won't get through to the NSA.". Slate. Retrieved May 11,
2006.

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 28 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

David Cunningham. There's Something Happening Here: The New Left, the Klan, and FBI.
University of California Press, 2005: "However, strong suspicions lingered that the
program's tactics were sustained on a less formal basissuspicions sometimes furthered
by agents themselves, who periodically claimed that counterintelligence activities were
continuing, though in a manner undocumented within Bureau files."; Hobson v. Brennan,
646 F.Supp. 884 (D.D.C.,1986)
Bud Schultz, Ruth Schultz. The Price of Dissent: Testimonies to Political Repression in
America. University of California Press, 2001: "Although the FBI officially discontinued
COINTELPRO immediately after the Pennsylvania disclosures "for security reasons," when
pressed by the Senate committee, the bureau acknowledged two new instances of
"Cointelpro-type" operations. The committee was left to discover a third, apparently illegal
operation on its own."
Athan G. Theoharis, et al. The FBI: A Comprehensive Reference Guide. Greenwood
Publishing Group, 1999: "More recent controversies have focused on the adequacy of
recent restrictions on the Bureau's domestic intelligence operations. Disclosures of the
1970s that FBI agents continued to conduct break-ins, and of the 1980s that the FBI
targeted CISPES, again brought forth accusations of FBI abuses of powerand raised
questions of whether reforms of the 1970s had successfully exorcised the ghost of FBI
Director Hoover."
The Associated Press, "FBI tracked journalist for over 20 years". Toronto Star. November
7, 2008. Retrieved November 23, 2008.
Bud Schultz, Ruth Schultz. The Price of Dissent: Testimonies to Political Repression in
America. University of California Press, 2001: "The problem persists after Hoover."The
record before this court," Federal Magistrate Joan Lefkow stated in 1991, "shows that
despite regulations, orders and consent decrees prohibiting such activities, the FBI had
continued to collect information concerning only the exercise of free speech."
Mike Mosedale, "Bury My Heart," City Pages, Volume 21 - Issue 1002, 16 February 2000
"FBI Probes of Groups Were Improper, Justice Department Says". The San Jose Mercury
News. September 20, 2010. also reported at democracynow.org, 21 September 2010
Churchill, Ward, and Jim Vander Wall, (1990), The COINTELPRO Papers: Documents from
the FBI's Secret Wars Against Domestic Dissent, Boston: South End Press, pp. xii, 303.
Churchill, Ward; and James Vander Wall. Agents of Repression: The FBI's Secret Wars
against the Black Panther Party and the American Indian Movement, 1988, Boston, South
End Press.
Weyler, Rex. Blood of the Land: The Government and Corporate War Against First Nations.
Matthiessen, Peter, In the Spirit of Crazy Horse, 1980, Viking.
Woidat, Caroline M. "The Truth Is on the Reservation: American Indians and Conspiracy
Culture", The Journal of American Culture 29 (4), 2006, pp. 454467
McQuinn, Jason. "Conspiracy Theory vs Alternative Journalism", Alternative Press Review,
Vol. 2, No. 3, Winter 1996
Horowitz, David. "Johnnie's Other O.J.", Front Page Magazine.com, September 1, 1997.
Woidat, Caroline M. "The Truth Is on the Reservation: American Indians and Conspiracy
Culture", The Journal of American Culture 29 (4), 2006. pp. 454467
Berlet, Chip. "The X-Files Movie: Facilitating Fanciful Fun, or Fueling Fear and Fascism?
Conspiracy Theories for Fun, Not for False Prophets", 1998, Political Research Associates

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 29 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Berlet, Chip; and Matthew N. Lyons. 1998, "One key to litigating against government
prosecution of dissidents: Understanding the underlying assumptions", Parts 1 and 2,
Police Misconduct and Civil Rights Law Report (West Group), 5 (13), (JanuaryFebruary):
145153; and 5 (14), (MarchApril): 157162.

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 30 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

INTERNET LINKS OF INTEREST

ERIC COHEN AND ROBERT BERUBE, Federal Public Defender for Esteban Santiago, Ft. Lauderdale
Shooter, INVOICE AND FEE SCHEDULE January 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337072519/ERIC-COHEN-Federal-Public-Defender-for-
Esteban-Santiago-Ft-Lauderdale-Shooter-INVOICE-AND-FEE-SCHEDULE-January-20-2017

STAN CATERBONE NAMED AMICUS FOR KATHLEEN KANE Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No.
3575 EDA 2016 FRIDAY JANUARY 20, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/337120127/STAN-CATERBONE-NAMED-AMICUS-FOR-
KATHLEEN-KANE-Superior-Court-of-Pennsylvania-Case-No-3575-EDA-2016-FRIDAY-JANUARY-20-
2017

WHISTLEBLOWERS KAREN STEWART AND STAN CATERBONE A Candid Discussion of Electronic


Harassment Protocols, January 11, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336256943/WHISTLEBLOWERS-KAREN-STEWART-AND-
STAN-CATERBONE-A-Candid-Discussion-of-Electronic-Harassment-Protocols-January-11-2017

The Surreptitious Reincarnation of COINTELPRO with the COPS Gang-Stalking Program


https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/surreptitious-reincarnation-cointelpro-cops-program-stan-
caterbone

Video: Media Blacks Out Edward Snowdens Talk On COINTELPRO & History Of Mass Surveillance
http://www.mintpressnews.com/video-media-blacks-out-edward-snowdens-talk-on-cointelpro-
history-of-mass-surveillance/224222/

Letters: Snowden deserves pardon by John and Bonnie Raines, Philadelphia of the Citizens
Commission to Investigate the FBI in 1971
http://www.philly.com/philly/opinion/20170119_Letters__Snowden_deserves_pardon.html

Legal Implications of the Soviet Microwave Bombardment of the U.S. Embassy


https://www.scribd.com/document/336787302/Legal-Implications-of-the-1959-Soviet-
Microwave-Bombardment-of-the-U-S-Embassy-January-17-2017

Congressman Robert Walker Pleading July 7 1991 Important


https://www.scribd.com/document/270267368/Congressman-Robert-Walker-Pleading-July-7-
1991-Important

That time the CIA was convinced a self-proclaimed psychic had paranormal abilities
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2017/01/19/that-time-the-cia-was-
convinced-a-self-proclaimed-psychic-had-paranormal-abilities/?
postshare=8421484844095309&tid=ss_tw&utm_term=.b487b6ae00e7

Obama's most enduring legacy may be the establishment of the modern US surveillance state
http://www.businessinsider.com/obamas-most-enduring-legacy-the-modern-us-surveillance-
state-2017-1

The Extortion of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pa by COINTELPRO PROGRAMS January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336832214/The-Extortion-of-220-Stone-Hill-Road-
Conestoga-Pa-by-COINTELPRO-PROGRAMS-January-17-2017

AMG LEGAL SYSTEMS PROTOTYPE Mastered on April 16, 1991 at Commadore Inc., January 17,
2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787897/AMG-LEGAL-SYSTEMS-PROTOTYPE-Mastered-
on-April-16-1991-at-Commadore-Inc-January-17-2017

Stan J. Caterbone, Controller of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., 1993 to 1998 January 17, 2017

https://www.scribd.com/document/336787739/Stan-J-Caterbone-Controller-of-Pflumm-
Contractors-Inc-1993-to-1998-January-17-2017

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 31 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Sam Lombardo and Raolph Mazzochi Charlotte Street Proposal by Advanced Media Group and Stan
J. Caterbone January 17, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336787416/Sam-Lombardo-and-Raolph-Mazzochi-
Charlotte-Street-Proposal-by-Advanced-Media-Group-and-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-17-2017

B2B Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16, 2017


https://www.scribd.com/document/336787303/B2B-Consulting-From-1999-to-2002-January-
16-2017

1999 Excelsior Place Business Plan by Stan J. Caterbone January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336719627/1999-Excelsior-Place-Business-Plan-by-Stan-J-
Caterbone-January-16-2017

Stan J. Caterbone AIM MUTUAL FUNDS Consulting From 1999 to 2002 January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336738750/Stan-J-Caterbone-AIM-MUTUAL-FUNDS-
Consulting-From-1999-to-2002-January-16-2017

Pro Financial Group Brochure and Eastern Regional Free Agent Camp by Stan J. Caterbone
January 16, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336704842/Pro-Financial-Group-Brochure-and-Eastern-
Regional-Free-Agent-Camp-by-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-16-2017

STAN J. CATERBONE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP JOINT VENTURE WITH DALE HIGH January 15,
2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637179/56-STAN-J-CATERBONE-ADVANCED-MEDIA-
GROUP-JOINT-VENTURE-WITH-DALE-HIGH-January-15-2017

Institutional Investors Mortgage Banking Business Development of 1987 January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637178/58-Institutional-Investors-Mortgage-Banking-
Business-Development-of-1987-January-15-2017

1987 JOINT VENTURE - Tony Bongiovi, Power Station Studios, and Flatbush Films with Stan J.
Caterbone January 15, 2017
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637176/55-1987-JOINT-VENTURE-Tony-Bongiovi-
Power-Station-Studios-and-Flatbush-Films-with-Stan-J-Caterbone-January-15-2017

STAN J. CATERBONE'S Financial Management Group, Ltd., Anti-Trust Litigation File of October 17,
2015
https://www.scribd.com/document/336637173/57-STAN-J-CATERBONE-S-Financial-
Management-Group-Ltd-Anti-Trust-Litigation-File-of-October-17-2015

FALSE IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence Agencies November


12, 2016

https://www.scribd.com/document/329761557/FALSE-IMPRISONMENT-AND-ILLEGAL-
INTERROGATIONS-by-U-S-Intelligence-Agencies-and-U-S-Sponsored-Mind-Control-EVIDENCE-
November-2-2016

Scribd

Letter REQUEST for COMMUTATION of the Sentence of Lisa Michell Lambert to President Obama,
November 15, 2016
Stan J. Caterbone and Conflicts With the Trump Administration - Monday November 14, 2016 |
False Claims Act | Military

STAN J. CATERBONE and the DEPARTMENT of DEFENSE Documents and Evidence of Conspiracy
to .... Saturday November 12, 2016

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 32 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

Feds Probe Fulton Bank and 3 Other Subsidiary Banks of Fulton Financial With Stan J. Caterbone
Civil Actions and Mind Control Research of Monday November 9, 2016 | Robert Gates
Letter to James Comey, Director of FBI Re Cointelpro Used to Obstruct Justice Monday November
28, 2016 | Federal Bureau Of Investigation | Central Intelligence Agency

VITALLY IMPORTANT - LETTER and DOCUMENT to Cappello & Noel, LLP of Santa Barbara, CA
Friday November 25, 2016

Report of Douglas F Gansler/Kathleen Kane on Misuse of Commonwealth Email Systems


November 22, 2016 Published by ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP |

Pro Se Legal Representation In The United States | Motion In United States Law

Lancaster Mayor Rick Gray Says There is Room for Improvement in Police Communication -
CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Bureau, et.al., November 22, 2016 | Central Intelligence
Agency

Chapter 12 - ROHYPNOL AND SATELLITE and Chapter 11 - NEIGHBORS FROM HELL, from Satellite
Terrorism in America, by Dr. John Hall Copyright 2009
| J. Edgar Hoover | Federal Bureau Of Investigation

JIM GUERIN, FOUNDER OF ISC, FAREWELL LETTER OF 1989 December 26, 2016 | Justice |
Government
CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON Candidate for JUDGESHIP and His 1987 EFFORT FOR MY
GUARDIANSHIP Friday December 16, 2016

ANOTHER LANCASTER COVER-UP THE SALE OF THE MASONIC HALL IN THE CITY OF LANCASTER,
by The Advanced Media Group, December 15, 2016 | Fraternal Service Organizations

Usage Statistics for www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com TOTALS and MONTHLY From May of


2016 to January 2017 - January 10, 2017

My Friend and Colleague Soleilmavis Liu of China a Victim of Mind Control Living in China Who
Started Peacepink- August 28, 2016

TD Ameritrade TRADEKEEPER PROFIT-LOSS FOR 2004 TRADES and 2017 FULTON STOCK January
9, 2017

POLICE INCIDENT REPORTS OF PHYSICAL ASSAULTS FOR STAN J. CATERBONE 2005 TO 2016
January 6, 2017

Judiciaries

UPDATED STATEMENT OF FACTS re CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police Department US District


Court Case 08-cv-08982 December 28, 2016

Section 504 Of The Rehabilitation Act | Rehabilitation Act Of 1973

UPDATED - EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as Targeted Individuals of U.S.


Sponsored Mind Control and Related Hearings and Lectures, December 27, 2016

Torture

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 33 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


42 U.S. Code 1983 - Civil action for deprivation of rights

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 34 of 70 Thursday February 9, 2017


United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?490294791050398-L_1_0-1
Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document42
37U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16 Page
1983 - Civil What30Gives
action of deprivation
for 69Them TheofRight?
rights
CLOSED,SPECIAL

United States District Court


Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:08-cv-02982-MAM

CATERBONE et al v. LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU et al Date Filed: 06/18/2008


Assigned to: HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN Date Terminated: 07/11/2008
Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act Jury Demand: None
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Plaintiff
STANLEY J. CATERBONE represented by STANLEY J. CATERBONE
1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
717-669-2163
Email: scaterbone@live.com
PRO SE

Plaintiff
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP represented by ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
c/o STANLEY J. CATERBONE
1250 FREMONT STREET
LANCASTER, PA 17603
717-427-1821
PRO SE

V.
Defendant
LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU

Defendant
SECTOR 9 OF THE LANCASTER CITY
BUREAU OF POLICE

Defendant
KEITH SADDLER
LANCASTER CITY BUREAU OF POLICE
CHIEF

Defendant
RICK GRAY
LANCASTER CITY MAYOR

Defendant
CITY OF LANCASTER

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016
J. Caterbone City
Allstate PoliceTO
MOTION
Property Dept.
DISMISS Page
Claim Page10
Page 30of
35 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Thursday February
Friday, 29, 2016
9, 2016
April 15, 2017

1 of 2 11/7/2015 5:56 AM
United States District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania https://ecf.paed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?490294791050398-L_1_0-1
Case 5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document42
37U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16 Page
1983 - Civil What31Gives
action of deprivation
for 69Them TheofRight?
rights

Date Filed # Docket Text


06/18/2008 1 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE.(ti, )
(Entered: 06/26/2008)
07/11/2008 2 ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS
GRANTED. THIS COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED, WITH LEAVE TO FILE AN AMEDNED
COMPLAINT WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THIS ORDER. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE
THIS CASE STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON
7/10/2008.7/11/2008 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(ap, ) (Entered: 07/11/2008)
07/11/2008 3 COMPLAINT against LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, SECTOR 9 OF THE LANCASTER
CITY BUREAU OF POLICE, KEITH SADDLER, RICK GRAY, CITY OF LANCASTER, filed by
STANLEY J. CATERBONE, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP.(ap, ) (Entered: 07/11/2008)
07/22/2008 4 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE..(ap, ) (Entered:
07/22/2008)
07/25/2008 5 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IS GRANTED. THE
PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE HIS AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS OF THE
DATE OF THIS ORDER. IF PLAINTIFF DOES NOT DO SO, THIS COMPLAINT WILL BE
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDMENT, THE CLERK
SHALL NOT MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT.SIGNED BY
HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 7/25/08.7/28/08 ENTERED AND COPIES
MAILED.(ah) (Entered: 07/28/2008)
09/25/2008 6 MOTION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE filed by STANLEY J. CATERBONE. with
EXHIBITS..(ap, ) (Entered: 09/26/2008)
10/10/2008 7 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO WITHDRAW WITHOUT PREJUDICE IS GRANTED; THIS
CASE SHALL REMAIND CLOSED STATISTICALLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A.
MCLAUGHLIN ON 10/10/2008.10/10/2008 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE.(ap, )
(Entered: 10/10/2008)

PACER Service Center


Transaction Receipt
11/07/2015 05:55:41
PACER
am6446:3514696:0 Client Code:
Login:
Search 2:08-cv-
Description: Docket Report
Criteria: 02982-MAM
Billable
1 Cost: 0.10
Pages:

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016
J. Caterbone City
Allstate PoliceTO
MOTION
Property Dept.
DISMISS Page
Claim Page11
Page 31of
36 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Thursday February
Friday, 29, 2016
9, 2016
April 15, 2017

2 of 2 11/7/2015 5:56 AM
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
4237U.S.
3 Filed
Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
What32
1983 - Civil 1 of
action of33
for
Gives 69
deprivation of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate Police Dept.
Property Claim Page
Page1232of 189 Thursday December 29, 2016
2016
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 MOTION TO DISMISS Page 37 ofof7069 Friday,
Thursday April 15,
February 9, 2017
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
4237U.S.
3 Filed
Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
1983 - Civil
What 33
2 of
action of33
for
Gives 69
deprivation of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page13
Page 33of
38 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
4237U.S.
3 Filed
Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
1983 - Civil
What 34
3 of
action of33
for
Gives 69
deprivation of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page14
Page 34of
39 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
4237U.S.
3 Filed
Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
1983 - Civil
What 35
4 of
action of33
for
Gives 69
deprivation of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page15
Page 35of
40 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
4237U.S.
3 Filed
Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
1983 - Civil
What 36
5 of
action of33
for
Gives 69
deprivation of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page16
Page 36of
41 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
4237U.S.
3 Filed
Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
1983 - Civil
What 37
6 of
action of33
for
Gives 69
deprivation of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page17
Page 37of
42 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
4237U.S.
3 Filed
Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
1983 - Civil
What 38
7 of
action of33
for
Gives 69
deprivation of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page18
Page 38of
43 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
4237U.S.
3 Filed
Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
1983 - Civil
What 39
8 of
action of33
for
Gives 69
deprivation of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page19
Page 39of
44 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
4237U.S.
3 Filed
Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
Page
1983 - Civil
What 40
9 of
action of33
for
Gives 69
deprivation of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page20
Page 40of
45 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 41
10
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page21
Page 41of
46 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 42
11
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page22
Page 42of
47 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 43
12
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page23
Page 43of
48 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 44
13
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page24
Page 44of
49 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 45
14
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page25
Page 45of
50 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 46
15
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page26
Page 46of
51 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 47
16
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page27
Page 47of
52 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 48
17
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page28
Page 48of
53 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 49
18
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page29
Page 49of
54 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 50
19
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page30
Page 50of
55 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 51
20
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page31
Page 51of
56 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 52
21
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page32
Page 52of
57 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 53
22
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page33
Page 53of
58 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 54
23
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page34
Page 54of
59 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 55
24
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page35
Page 55of
60 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 56
25
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page36
Page 56of
61 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 57
26
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page37
Page 57of
62 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 58
27
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page38
Page 58of
63 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 59
28
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page39
Page 59of
64 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 60
29
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page40
Page 60of
65 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 61
30
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page41
Page 61of
66 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 62
31
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page42
Page 62of
67 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 63
32
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page43
Page 63of
68 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case 2:08-cv-02982-MAM
5:15-cv-03984-JCJ Document
Document
4237
3U.S.Filed
Code04/15/16
07/11/08 Page
1983 - Civil 64
33
action
What of deprivation
for
Gives 69
33 of rights
Them The Right?

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
J. Caterbone City
Allstate
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016 Police
TODept.
Property
MOTION Claim Page
DISMISS Page44
Page 64of
69 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Friday,
Thursday 29,9,
April 15,
February 2016
2016
2017
Case
Case5:15-cv-03984-JCJ
2:08-cv-02982-MAMDocument
Document
4237U.S.
7 Filed
Filed
Code04/15/16
10/10/08 Page
Page
1983 - Civil What65
1Gives
action of deprivation
for 69
1 Them TheofRight?
rights

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STANLEY J. CATERBONE : CIVIL ACTION


ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP :
v. :
:
LANCASTER CITY POLICE BUREAU, et al.: NO. 08-2982

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of October, 2008, upon

consideration of plaintiffs Motion for Withdraw Without

Prejudice (Doc. No. 6), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiffs Motion for Withdraw Without Prejudice is

GRANTED; and

(2) This case shall remain CLOSED statistically.


BY THE COURT:

/S/ MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN, J.

CATERBONE
Stan v. Lancaster
MJ-02101-NT-0001214-2016
J. Caterbone City
Allstate PoliceTO
MOTION
Property Dept.
DISMISS Page
Claim Page45
Page 65of
70 189
ofof
7069 Thursday December
Thursday February
Friday, 29, 2016
9, 2016
April 15, 2017