You are on page 1of 3

DIFFERENCES IN DECOMPOSITION RATES OF BONE, MUSCLE, AND FAT

Camille Louren N. Go
BS Biology, major in Microbiology, University of the Philippines Los Banos
Cngo1@up.edu.ph

Abstract:

Abstract should be written with 8 font size, Trebuchet MS, justified, single line spacing.
Objective, method and findings are summarized in this section.

Keywords: This section should contain maximum 5 words that are written in 8 font size and
seperated with commas.

GENERAL GUIDELINES
Extended abstracts should be written according to the below structure including the following
headings: abstract and keywords, introduction, methods, findings and argument, conclusion
and recommendations. There is flexibility as to the naming of the sections. Sub-headings can
be used when necessary.

Extended abstract shall be written in font Trebuchet MS, single line spacing and 9 font size.
Extended abstracts can contain figures, tables and/or images. Page format should be A4 page size
with margins 2.5 cm wide from the right, left, top and bottom. Extended abstracts should not
exceed 4 pages including the references and pages should not be numbered.

Authors' names must not appear anywhere in the paper when this is first submitted to the
organisers.

INTRODUCTION
The introduction section should (1) present the scope and objective of the paper and state
the problem, (2) briefly review the pertinent literature, (3) describe the methods, and (4) provide
an overview of the main results of the work.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our approach in this experiment was to determine if there is significant difference in the
decomposition rates of three different tissue types. The experiment included three types of tissue
samples acquired from pig (n=4): fat, muscle and bone. A section of pig adipose tissue still
containing the skin was used as fat samples. Pig muscle was scraped off from the bones to
separate the two tissue types. Due the unequal availability of the tissues, it was not possible to

as for the tables. Tukey post-hoc tests were used to compare which tissues are significantly different from each other. . Figures and images should be numbered (see Figure 2 for an example) and figure headers should be placed under the figure or image. they should also be numbered (see Table 2 for an example) and the table header should be placed at the top. The burial holes were prepared in such a way that the replicates are in a randomized complete block design. The samples were then put in labeled mesh bags and were sewn shut. The bags containing the samples were buried in a shallow grave within a damp soil containing a loamy sand composition. tables and images of the results (no more than two figures and two tables) may be included in the extended abstract. RESULTS The findings and arguments of the work should be explicitely described and illustrated. To compensate this. After 7 days. Decomposition rate of each tissue was then calculated using the formula: Where: The average decomposition rate of each tissue type was determined and compared. images and figures should be centered. figures and images in the form of author surname and publication date. the bags were rinsed with water and the tissues were weighed gravimetrically. figures and images should be presented right under the tables.divide the samples in equal sizes and weights. The experiment was conducted in Los Banos Laguna with a tropical climate. the samples were retrieved from each burial hole. each of the initial weights of the samples was recorded. Supporting figures. References (if any) of the tables. Following harvest. All the tables.

8 6 4 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Figure 2. (2) any exceptions to. and (5) conclusions drawn and recommendations. Header Reference: author surname and publication date CONCLUSIONS Conclusions should include (1) the principles and generalisations inferred from the results. Header Table 2. or problems with these principles and generalisations.chicagomanualofstyle. .org/tools_citationguide.html. (3) theoretical and/or practical implications of the work. REFERENCES References should be listed in alphabetical order and presented in a a format according to the Chicago Manual of Style: http://www.