From:To:Cc:Subject:
TCA: VF-300 types
Date:
Wednesday, March 05, 2008 4:33:18 PM
Importance:
High
FYI, let us know if you need more justification. Thanks,
From:
Sent:
Wednesday, March 05, 2008 2:30 PM
To:
Subject:
FW: VF-300 types
Importance:
High
I sent this out to on the 29
th
. Let me know what else he needs on it.
From:
Sent:
Friday, February 29, 2008 1:51 PM
To:
Cc:
Subject:
RE: VF-300 types
Importance:
High
I could not get your PDF to allow me to alter/edit. I generated a clone spreadsheet with theinformation you requested. Please let me know if something doesn’t look correct or make sense. Thestations have also scrubbed the information.
From:
Sent:
Thursday, February 28, 2008 8:48 AM
To:
Cc:
Subject:
FW: VF-300 types
All,
(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)
(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)
We are reaching out to each of your sectors to verify what type of vehicle fencedesign you require in your AOR’s. I’ve attached a spread sheet that identifies map IDand planned mileage. Would you please fill in the block that stipulates fence type andsend it back to me. Please keep in mind that the design should be operationallydriven. If you anticipate that your vehicle fence may need to incorporate pedestrianfence in the future because of operations then VF-1 (rail on post) should be selectedover VF-2 (Normandy style). Consequently if the terrain is harsh and rocky, severelysloped, sandy soil, etc. then VF-2 may be the best choice. You guys know your area’s better than most, so we are depending on your input to ensure you get whatyou need for your sectors. Lastly, I will need a brief justification for the designs you picked (VF-1 or VF-2) for each map ID, as well as why VF was preferred over PF or no fencing in thoseareas,for future GAO audits. Thanks
(A)SOSOffice of Border PatrolTactical Infrastructure Branch1300 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,Washington, D.C. 20229CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail, including any attachments, is for the sole use of theintended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. Parts of this document may contain sensitive securityinformation that is controlled under the provisions of 49 CFR 1520. If you are not the intendedrecipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
(b) (6)(b) (6)
Map IDSBI Project #LocationCongressional DistrictPlanned Contingency MileagePlanned Core MileageMilitary Mileage Left to constructComm. Mileage Left to constructExisitng Mobile Vehicle FenceExisitng Fixed Vehicle Fence22-Feb Cum. Actual MileagePerfFence Type
DV-12202-1/AJOCabeza Prieta7015.54000015.54SundtVF-1,Rail-on-PostDV-3a1023-4/AJO7015.4809.7404.84.8Comm. TBDVF-1DV-3b1023-5/AJO70.410.40000Military TBDVF-1EV-12204-1/SONSonoita814.817.8307.307.3OJSVF-2, NormandyDV-4a1024-3/CAGTohono O'Odham Nation719.36019.36000Comm. TBDVF-1, VF-2DV-4b1024-4/CAGTohono O'Odham Nation712.943.8403.42.56OJSVF-1, VF-2FV-1a2203-1/DGLDouglas East8220000OJSVF-1FV-1b2203-2/DGLDouglas East86.7810.66017.44000Comm. TBDVF-1/VF-2DV-22205-1/AJOSierra De La Nariz71.5201.52000Comm. TBDVF-1DV-52206-1/TUC73.0303.03000Comm. TBDVF-1Justifications; 1) The original EA called for TVB (mobile Vehicle Fence), 2) this is a mostly Forest Service land and is a remote area. Justifications; 1) Remote area with little-to-no infrastructure south or north. 2) VF-2 to be used where terrain dictates.Justifications; 1) Remote area with little-to-no infrastructure south or north. 2) VF-2 to be used where terrain dictates.
Tucson Sector: Vehicle Fence 300 Locations and Comments
Justifications; 1) The TON will not permit Pedestrian Fence, VF-1/2 as the terrain permits. Justifications; 1) The TON will not permit Pedestrian Fence, VF-1/2 as the terrain permits. Justifications; 1) Remote area with little-to-no infrastructure south or north. 2) VF-2 to be used where terrain dictates.Justifications; 1) Remote area with little-to-no infrastructure south or north. 2) VF-2 to be used where terrain dictates.Justifications; 1) remote location, 2) Wildlife concern of the wilderness with Pedestrian fence, 3) community input.Justifications; 1) Different Districts prefer different styles (Bollard vs. Rail-on-Post), 2) The TON will not permit Pedestrian Fence.Justifications; 1) Different Districts prefer different styles (Bollard vs. Rail-on-Post), 2) The TON will not permit Pedestrian Fence.
(b) (6)(b) (6)(b) (6)
Reward Your Curiosity
Everything you want to read.
Anytime. Anywhere. Any device.
No Commitment. Cancel anytime.