48 views

Uploaded by Anonymous AkzeMHNTUy

save

- 1 Dynamics+of+Structures 12.7
- 20150075.full
- Nuevo Metodo Para Obtener Velocidad y Desplazamiento Basado en Acelerograma Sin Condiciones Iniciales
- tv_21_2014_3_599_608
- .Nonlinear Dynamics of Mechanical Systems With Friction Contacts by HBM
- Vibration Characteristics of Double Tee Building Floors
- Paper 20
- CA Aa242b Ch2
- Free Vibe Summary
- Civil Sem-7
- Dynamics_FreeVibration
- Design Penstock
- EM71 -Some Thoughts on Vibration Reduction
- 01
- Vibration-Isolation-and-Transmissibility-by-www-engineering-me-uk.pdf
- 950464
- Variable Velocity Exponential Input Shaping for Position Controlled Robotic Systems
- 6ME4 Noise, Vibration and Harshness (Old) (1)
- Bucher and Ewins ROS
- Whats Newb fgdf
- sdof-dyn
- CPCI Design Manual 4 Errata 8-5-08
- Investigation on structural and aerodynamic characteristics of resonant type elastic flapping wing.pdf
- IRJET-Comparison of Seismic Behavior of Building with Fixed Base, Base Isolator and Shear Wall
- RSA Using Spreadsheet
- a107412101-Vibrations and Structural Dynamics_1st Mid
- My Mdv Final
- COMPARISON OF RESPONSE TO UNBALANCE OF OVERHUNG ROTOR SYSTEM FOR DIFFERENT SUPPORTS
- Mechanical Vibrations
- Eqstatic M
- CH-08-Preheating & Post heating.pdf
- 07MnMoVR steel chn786s1_t.pdf
- 2_07-modal.ppt
- AWC-DA6-Beam Formula.pdf
- AWS Level II - Advanced Welder - - Guide for the Training and Qualification of Welding Personnel.pdf
- CH-08-Preheating & Post heating.pdf
- Accumulator capacity.pdf
- Ansys-Tips.pdf
- Fasteners.pdf
- 19_BeamElements.pptx
- CHE507R.pdf
- 19_BeamElements.pptx
- Pressure Vessel Example ansys apdl.pdf
- 2 Basic-Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams.pdf
- 000632.ppt
- ISO 1940-1 Balancing.docx
- Francis runner analysis using FEM.pdf
- 978-1-58503-754-4-1 WB.pdf
- Strength Analysis of Bifurcation WienSeminar-WH-stress
- reworld20160910-dl.pdf
- Pen Stocks
- Straight through labyrinth types and influence on leakage.pdf
- Air Carbon Arc Gouging Data
- is.10210.1993 Hoist design critera.pdf
- Bolt Ddesign_2ndEditionGuide.pdf
- Beam_Examples02.pdf
- Penstocks.pdf
- Cast Materials From KSB-Data
- turbine shaft.doc

SEISMIC ANALYSIS

Hydrodynamic

pressures

**Dr Martin Wieland investigates
**

hydrodynamic pressures in penstocks,

bottom outlets, plugs of diversion tunnels

and gates of intake structures and spillways

caused by earthquakes

P

ENSTOCKS, plugs of diversion tunnels, gates in bottom Damage and failure of buried water and gas mains has been

outlets, intake structures and spillways, valves and other caused by quite a number of earthquakes. The vulnerability of these

hydromechanical components of the pressurised water system lifelines is not a new phenomenon. However, the implications of

in hydro power plants have rarely been designed for the these observations may not yet have been fully realised elsewhere.

hydrodynamic pressures, which may be caused during a strong earth- Penstocks and gates of hydro power plants are not intrinsically safe

quake. In general the hydrodynamic pressure according to Westergaard against earthquakes. Earthquakes can cause damage to penstocks

is assumed. This assumption is acceptable for gates of surface spillways, by different mechanisms as discussed below:

but not for gates located in tunnels or valves in large diameter penstocks. • Hydrodynamic pressures due to ground shaking: The magnitude

Although no case is known where a penstock has failed or been of the pressure depends on the response spectrum of the ground

damaged during a strong earthquake, the question of earthquake shaking and the natural period of the oscillating mass in the

safety still has to be addressed. As earthquakes affect all components pressurised water system.

of a hydro power plant, hydrodynamic actions also have to be checked • Relative displacements along active faults.

for all hydromechanical components. It may be argued that in the • Support movements due to earthquake-triggered slides.

pressurised water system the water hammer is already investigated • Rock falls on penstocks on the surface in steep terrain.

and the emergency shut-down of a penstock may cause the maximum • Dynamic forces in penstock due to support movements and

hydrodynamic pressures. As discussed in the subsequent sections, the deformations of rigid anchor points.

hydrodynamic pressures due to valve regulation are larger than those • Dynamic soil pressures in buried penstocks; imposed (quasi-static)

due to earthquakes in long penstocks or pressure tunnels with a deformations due to soil liquefaction, differential settlements and

natural period of vibration of the water of several seconds. However, creep movements of slopes, etc.

in relatively short penstocks with fundamental eigenfrequency of the It is evident from the above list that the seismic actions, which can

oscillating water mass in the range of the dominant frequencies of the cause damage to a penstock, cover a wide spectrum. To ignore the

earthquake ground motion, the situation may be the opposite. earthquake action because it may not have been considered in the

**18 OCTOBER 2005 INTERNATIONAL WATER POWER & DAM CONSTRUCTION
**

p18_24_WP_Oct05_Seismic_CD 10/10/05 11:47 am Page 19

SEISMIC ANALYSIS

**Anticlockwise from above: Figure 1: Rock falls caused by 1990 Manjil earth-
**

quake at Seﬁd Rud buttress dam site: access road to dam crest littered with

rocks (inset), and overturning of ﬁrst transmission line tower due to rock fall;

Figure 2: Punctured fuel pipeline due to rock fall caused by 1990 Manjil

earthquake in Iran

Figure 3: Horizontal sliding bearings of the Trans Alaska pipeline at the Denali

fault crossing

Figure 4: Leakage from damaged gate of intermediate level spillway of Seﬁd Rud

buttress dam following the 1990 Manjil earthquake in Iran (radial gates not visible)

**example, during the 1990 Manjil earthquake in Iran, one of the two
**

radial gates of the intermediate level spillway of the Sefid Rud

buttress dam was damaged due to hydrodynamic forces resulting

from a mass oscillation of the relatively short intake tunnel. One of

the arms of the radial gates buckled and one of the trunnion plates

cracked (Jalalzadeh, 2000). Due to the deformations, the damaged

gate could not be operated after the earthquake and was leaking.

So what should be done in order to improve the seismic safety of

a penstock? First, it is necessary to identify the type of seismic hazard

(see list on p18) and the weak elements in a penstock.Such checks

are not very costly and it is worthwhile to perform them in the

context of an overall safety assessment involving other hazards from

the natural and man-made environment.

In order to minimise the potential damage in the case of failure of

a penstock, the proper functioning of valves during and after an

earthquake must be guaranteed. Thus, the seismic safety of these

devices shall be carefully checked and assessed.

The rock fall and landslide hazard is best assessed together with an

past would not be an acceptable argument. Also, to simply declare experienced geologist, who is familiar with the local conditions. The best

the earthquake action on a penstock as an acceptable risk, does not protection of a penstock against rock falls is by burying the penstock.

comply with today’s state of knowledge practice, particularly in view Anchor points in potentially unstable slopes need special solutions.

of the fact that rather sophisticated dynamic analyses are already Of course, the best solution would be to avoid such locations.

carried out for the seismic design of dams. However, for high head penstocks in the mountains, the slopes are

In mountainous regions the main hazard is from rock falls and mass generally very steep with slope angles up to 45°, which exceeds the

movements. For example, during the 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake in friction angle of the slope wash or the weathered rock, therefore, the

Taiwan (magnitude 7.5) and the 1990 Manjil earthquake in Iran (mag- slope stability of supports is a general problem. Earthquake damage

nitude 7.6) several thousand rock falls have occurred (Figures 1 and 2). can be accepted when, due to the release of the water in the penstock,

Therefore, rock falls and mass movements have to be expected and people are not affected and damage to the environment and

appropriate action shall be taken in the design of penstocks (soil cover, property is limited and the economical losses can be covered by

concrete protection, pressure shaft instead of surface penstock etc.). insurance. Earthquake alarm systems, which allow the automatic

Fault crossings may require special solutions, as shown in the shut-down of a penstock and the installation of additional valves in

examples in Figure 3, where the Trans Alaska pipeline is crossing long penstocks, may be more effective than designing a penstock for

the Denali fault. During the magnitude 7.9 Denali earthquake of 3 the worst seismic actions (Griesser et al., 2004).

November 2002, signiﬁcant horizontal fault movements occurred In the subsequent sections the earthquake-induced hydrodynamic

at this location. Due to the sliding bearings, the fault movements pressures in penstocks are discussed, which for low head schemes

could be absorbed without major damage and with a very short can greatly exceed the hydrostatic pressures. These pressures may

interruption of the pipeline operation (Sorenson and Meyer, 2003). not only jeopardise the safety of the penstock but also the gates and

Besides the penstocks, the gates of spillways, bottom outlets, valves located in relatively short intake tunnels and penstocks,

intakes etc. can also be affected by high hydrodynamic forces. This respectively. Moreover, the plugs in closed diversion tunnels may

is the case when the gate is located in a pressure tunnel or shaft. For experience very high hydrodynamic forces during an earthquake.

**WWW.WATERPOWERMAGAZINE.COM OCTOBER 2005 19
**

p18_24_WP_Oct05_Seismic_CD 10/10/05 11:48 am Page 21

SEISMIC ANALYSIS

**H YDRODYNAMIC PRESSURES IN PENSTOCKS DUE
**

TO EARTHQUAKE ACTION

The hydrodynamic pressures in penstocks can be characterised by the

one-dimensional wave equation, which can be expressed as follows:

(1)

**where c is the wave propagation velocity of a pressure wave in an
**

elastic pipe (depending on the flexibility of the pipe and the

embedment, c varies between ca. 1000 to1300m/s), subscripts ‘t’

and ‘x’ denote partial derivation with respect to time and space, x

is the coordinate along the pipe axis and u(x,t) is the time-dependent

displacement of the elastic ﬂuid in direction of the pipe axis.

In case of an earthquake ground acceleration üg(t) in direction of

the pipe axis, the relative acceleration utt has to be replaced by the

total acceleration, which is the sum of the ground acceleration and

the relative acceleration, i.e. the wave equation takes the following

Fig. 5: Typical acceleration response spectra (5% damping) for a peak ground

form:

acceleration agd (return period: 475 years) and different soil types A (rock) to

F according to Eurocode 8 (2004)

(2)

**The hydrodynamic pressure, p(x,t), can be obtained from the following üg(t): ground acceleration in direction of pipe axis.
**

relationship, assuming the ﬂuid in the pipe being an elastic material:

The eigenfrequencies of the pressure system are as follows:

(3)

(10)

where E = c2 represents the equivalent modulus of elasticity of the

water and the elastic pipe and is the mass density of water (1000 The fundamental frequency (n=1) can be taken as f1 = c/(4L).

kg/m3).

In a penstock with the length L, which is closed at one end and The maximum of u n(t) can be obtained directly from the

terminates at the surface of a reservoir or surge chamber, the acceleration response spectrum, Sa(fn, n), i.e.

hydrodynamic pressure due to a ground excitation can be determined

with the mode superposition method (Clough and Penzien, 1975). (11)

Accordingly, the modes of vibration Xn(x) (subscript n denotes the

n-th mode) can be expressed as follows (note: x = 0 at the free surface Using equation 3 the hydrodynamic pressure at the ﬁxed end (x = L)

end of the pipe): of the n-th mode of vibration can be obtained in an analogous way.

(4) (12)

The modes of vibration satisfy the following orthogonality relationship: By substituting equation 11 and the expressions for fn and dn in

equation 12, we obtain the following maximum n-th pressure at the

ﬁxed end of the pipe:

(13)

(5)

The total hydrodynamic pressure at the closed end of the pipe can

Using u(x,t) = ∑ Xn(x) un(t) we obtain from equation 4 be obtained by using the the following standard superposition

method (SRSS-method) for the modal maxima:

(6)

(14)

where un(t) represents the n-th modal coordinate.

By substituting equation 6 into equation 2, multiplication with If only the contribution of the ﬁrst mode is taken into account then

Xn(x), introduction of a viscous damping term and integration along we obtain the following maximum hydrodynamic pressure at the

ther whole pipeline, the following equations of motion result: ﬁxed end:

(7) (15)

**where n: n-th damping ratio In case of a pipe (or tunnel) ﬁlled with an incompressible ﬂuid where
**

n: n-th circular frequency of oscillating ﬂuid in pipe in rad/s the ﬂexibility of the pipe is not accounted for, we obtain

(16)

**(8) where ao is the peak ground acceleration. This means the total mass
**

in the pipe (or tunnel) behaves like a rigid body and the maximum

dn: n-th modal partizipation factor, inertia force is equal the total mass of water in the pipe of length L

multiplied with the peak ground acceleration.

The ratio between the maximum hydrodynamic pressures of the

compressible and incompressible ﬂuid, characterised by K, can be

(9) determined as follows:

**WWW.WATERPOWERMAGAZINE.COM OCTOBER 2005 21
**

p18_24_WP_Oct05_Seismic_CD 10/10/05 11:49 am Page 22

SEISMIC ANALYSIS

**for soil type A and a vibration period of 3.64 s (spectrum value:
**

0.264 for 5% damping). For an undamped pressure oscillation the

5% damped response spectrum has to be multiplied by = 1.414

according to equation 18. Therefore, we obtain

**p1,max = 8 x 1000 kg/m3 x 1000 m x 1.414 x 0.264 x 3 m/s2
**

/ 3.142 = 0.91 MPa or 9.1 bar

This maximum hydrodynamic pressure is independent of the head

or the average slope of the penstock. Therefore, for high head

penstocks with a hydrostatic pressure of several MPa’s, a maximum

dynamic pressure of about 1 MPa is not a serious concern. However,

for low head penstocks with static pressures in the order of the

dynamic pressure – this applies mainly to pipes in relatively flat

terrain – the hydrodynamic pressure has to be checked carefully. For

penstocks with a length of say 3000m the natural period of

vibration is three times that of the 1000 m long one and increases

to 10.9 s. For this period the spectrum acceleration drops to

roughly 1/9 of that of the 1000m long pipe as the tail of the response

spectrum is proportional to one over the square of the period. This

results in a hydrodynamic pressure of ca. 0.1 MPa or 1 bar.

The maximum hydrodynamic pressure of the second mode of

vibration (n=2) with a period of vibration of T2 = 4L/(3c) = 1.212 s

can be determined from equation 13 (spectrum value for 1.212 s for

soil type A in Fig. 5: 0.825):

p2,max = 8 x 1000 kg/m3 x 1000 m x 1.414 x 0.825 x 3 m/s2

Fig. 6: Typical examples of short penstocks in an arch dam (Bhumiphol dam, /(9 x 3.142) = 0.32 MPa (3.2 bar)

Thailand, above) and rockﬁll dam (Atatürk dam, Turkey, above, top)

Similarly, for the third mode of vibration we obtain (period of

vibration: 0.727 s, spectrum value: 1.375):

(17)

p3,max = 8 x 1000 kg/m3 x 1000 m x 1.414 x 1.375 x 3 m/s2

If the design response spectra shown in Figure 5 are used, then the

maximum spectrum ampliﬁcation factor for the absolute acceleration /(25 x 3.142) = 0.19 MPa (1.9 bar)

s = Sa,max/a0 varies between 2.5 (soil type A: rock) and 3.5 (soil type

E) for a damping ratio of 5%. However, the damping ratio of the From these numerical values it can be seen that the maximum hydro-

pressure oscillations in a penstock is usually less than 5%. For seismic dynamic pressures decrease with increasing mode number despite the

design purposes a damping ratio of about 2% may be assumed. The fact that the response spectrum is still increasing for periods down to

effect of the damping ratio on the elastic acceleration response 0.4 s. This is due to the fact that the hydrodynamic pressures are

spectra can be approximated by the following correction factor inversely proportional to (2n-1)2, where n is the mode number.

(Eurocode 8, 2004): Finally the total hydrodynamic pressure has to be calculated using

the SRSS superposition of the modal maxima according to equation

(18) 14. Thus for the ﬁrst three modes we obtain:

2 2 2 1/2

The response spectra for 5% damping have to be multiplied by the ptot = (0.91 + 0.32 + 0.19 ) = 0.98 MPa (9.8 bar)

above factor for periods exceeding 0.15 s (soil type A). In the case

of an undamped pressure oscillation, we obtain = 1.414. By comparing the total hydrodynamic pressure of the ﬁrst three

Therefore, for a rock foundation (s = 2.5) we obtain a maximum modes with that of the ﬁrst mode we can note that the total pressure

K-value of 2.9 (equation 17) for the undamped penstock. This is only 8% larger than that of the ﬁrst mode contribution. In view

means that the maximum hydrodynamic pressure in a compressible of the different assumptions made, this is a negligible difference.

liquid in a penstock can be more than twice as large as in an Therefore, for most applications it is sufﬁcient to include only the

incompressible one. In the case of soil type E (s = 3.5) we obtain a contribution of the ﬁrst mode.

maximum value of K of 8x3.5x1.41/3.142 = 4.0.

If a pressure tunnel is located in the body of a massive concrete

dam (e.g. oriﬁce spillway in arch dam) then the hydrodynamic pres- E XAMPLE 2: 130 M LONG PRESSURE TUNNEL

sure must be calculated using the so-called ﬂoor response spectrum Determine the maximum hydrodynamic pressure in a 130m long

at the location of the pressure tunnel rather than the acceleration pressure tunnel with the following properties: rock site with a peak

response spectrum of the ground motion. ground acceleration of 0.3g (3m/s2); wave propagation velocity in

the elastic pipe of c=1300m/s, damping ratio of 5%, mass density

of water of 1000kg/m3. The fundamental period of vibration

E XAMPLE 1: 1000 M LONG PENSTOCK according to equation 10 is T1 = 1/f1 = 4L/c = 0.4 s. The maximum

Determine the maximum hydrodynamic pressure in a 1000 m long hydrodynamic pressure of the ﬁrst mode of vibration is obtained

penstock with the following properties: rock site with a peak ground from equation 15 using the response spectrum shown in Figure 5

acceleration of 0.3 g (3m/s2); wave propagation velocity in the for soil type A and a vibration period of 0.4 s (spectrum value: 2.5

elastic pipe of c=1100 m/s, damping ratio of 0%, mass density of for 5% damping). Therefore, we obtain

water of 1000 kg/m3. The fundamental period of vibration according

to equation 10 is T 1 = 1/f 1 = 4L/c = 3.64 s. The maximum pmax = 8 x 1000 kg/m3 x 130 m x 2.5 x 3 m/s2 / 3.142 =

hydrodynamic pressure of the ﬁrst mode of vibration is obtained

from equation 15 using the response spectrum shown in Figure 5 0.79 MPa (7.9 bar)

**22 OCTOBER 2005 INTERNATIONAL WATER POWER & DAM CONSTRUCTION
**

p18_24_WP_Oct05_Seismic_CD 10/10/05 11:49 am Page 24

SEISMIC ANALYSIS

The maximum hydrodynamic pressure is of the same order as that • The high hydrodynamic pressures act during a relatively short

of the 1000m long penstock in Example 1. If zero damping would period of time, i.e. for a sinusoidal oscillation with a period of 5 s

be assumed then the maximum hydrodynamic pressure would reach the duration of high dynamic pressures is roughly 2 s in each cycle.

11.2 bar, which is more than that in Example 1. For short penstocks • In the case of extreme events with very low probability of occurrence

with small head or gates and plugs in relatively short tunnels, this average strength values may be taken into account together with

dynamic pressure is quite important. The example is selected in such load and safety factors of 1.0 if no speciﬁc regulations and guidelines

a way that for the given response spectrum the hydrodynamic pressure exist for such design situations.

would become a maximum, i.e. if the pressure tunnel is longer or • Local plastiﬁcation in ductile steel elements is acceptable as long

shorter than 130m then the hydrodynamic pressure will decrease. as the safety-relevant gates are still operable after the earthquake.

The contributions of the higher modes of vibration play a smaller This applies mainly to structural elements subjected to high

role in this example than in Example 1 as the spectrum values of the flexural stresses where, e.g., a small plastiﬁed zone in a ﬂange does

rock response spectrum do not increase further if the periods of not cause any signiﬁcant deformations, which would impair the

vibration decrease to below 0.4 s (in Example 2 the spectrum values serviceability of a gate.

of the 2nd and 3rd modes were larger than those of the 1st mode).. Using the above concepts – if applicable - then penstocks or gates,

In an incompressible pipe or tunnel the maximum hydrodynamic which have been designed for a safety factor of 1.8 should also be

pressure acting on a gate or valve is given by equation 16. able to cope with the increased stresses due to earthquake-induced

Accordingly in Example 1 we get a maximum dynamic pressure of hydrodynamic pressures. In any case a check of the seismic stresses

and deformations is necessary.

pmax = 1000 kg/m3 x 1000 m x 3 m/s2 = 3 MPa (30 bar)

and in Example 2 we obtain C ONCLUSIONS

Penstocks and other elements of the pressurised water system in hydro

pmax = 1000 kg/m3 x 130 m x 3 m/s2 = 0.39 MPa (3.9 bar). power plants have seldom been designed for earthquake action.

Earthquakes can cause substantial hydrodynamic forces in penstocks

We have to keep in mind that the slope of a penstock or pressure and pressure tunnels. Depending on foundation conditions (soil type)

tunnel does not have any effect on the maximum hydrodynamic and length of a penstock or pressure tunnel the maximum hydro-

pressure caused by an earthquake. dynamic pressures are up to 1 MPa for a peak ground acceleration

Furthermore, during pressure oscillation no negative pressures are of 0.3g. These dynamic pressures are not a problem for high head

possible. If such pressures are calculated based on the linear analysis penstocks in steep terrain as they amount to less than 20% of the

presented above then nonlinear processes would change the nature hydrostatic pressures in a penstock with a head of 500m. However,

of the oscillations. These phenomena are not discussed in this paper. in pipes in rather flat terrain with low head, the maximum

hydrodynamic pressures can be of the same magnitude as the

hydrostatic ones.

CONCLUSIONS DRAWN FROM NUMERICAL EXAMPLES High dynamic pressures are also expected in short pressure tunnels

Based on the above illustrative numerical examples the following located within the body of a dam, where at the location of the tunnel

conclusions may be drawn regarding the hydrodynamic pressures: a higher acceleration response is expected than on the ground.

• The hydrodynamic pressures in short penstocks (typical situation: However, the main seismic hazard for long surface penstocks in

dam with power house at the base of the dam, see Figure 6) and short mountainous regions results from mass movements and rock falls.

pressure tunnels can be quite high during strong earthquake In steep terrain large numbers of rock falls can be triggered by strong

shaking. In this case resonance-like pressure oscillations can devel- earthquakes. This was, for example, the case during strong

op under earthquake shaking, i.e. the lowest eigenfrequency of the earthquakes in Taiwan (1999) and Iran (1990).

pressurised water system is in the range of the dominant frequencies The analysis procedure discussed in this paper can be used to

of ground shaking. In this case the assumption of an incompressible determine the maximum hydrodynamic pressures in penstocks at

ﬂuid leads to an underestimate of the hydrodynamic pressures. the location of closed valves, the dynamic pressures acting on valves,

• In penstocks with a length of several hundred meters, the lowest gates and plugs installed in penstocks, pressure tunnels and

eigenfrequency of the pressurised water system is far below the diversion tunnels respectively. IWP & DC

dominant frequencies of ground shaking. In this case the maximum

hydrodynamic pressures in a compressible ﬂuid are below those

of an incompressible ﬂuid. Dr. Martin Wieland, Chairman, ICOLD Committee on

• The contributions of higher modes of vibration of the pressurised Seismic Aspects of Dam Design, Electrowatt-Ekono Ltd.

water system are relatively small and may be neglected. (Jaakko Pöyry Group), Hardturmstrasse 161, CH-8037

• The maximum hydrodynamic pressures depend on the shape of Zurich, Switzerland

the acceleration response spectrum. In the case of long penstocks

the fundamental period of vibration is of the order of several Tel. 076 356 28 62; Fax 044 355 55 61; E-mail:

seconds, which is beyond that of most buildings and bridges. Thus martin.wieland@ewe.ch

spectrum values result, which are rather low. Moreover, the design

response spectra given in building codes may be rather inaccurate References

in that range of periods. Therefore, the design response spectra Clough R.W., Penzien J. (1975): Dynamics of structures, McGraw-Hill, Inc., USA

used for such analyses have to be reviewed carefully. Eurocode 8 (2004): Design of structures for earthquake resistance, Part 2:

Bridges, European Standard, prEN 1998-2:200X, Draft 5, June 2004

PENSTOCKS AND GATES IN PRESSURE TUNNELS Griesser L., Wieland M, Walder R. (2004): Earthquake detection and safety

system for oil pipelines, Pipeline & Gas Journal, December

In the seismic design and safety check of penstocks and gates and

valves in pressure tunnels, the following items have to be taken into Jalalzadeh A.A., Fouladi N.C. (2000): Measures on gated spillway of

Seﬁdrud and Marun dams – case studies, Q.79-R.37, Proc. 20th Int.

consideration:

Congress on Large Dams, ICOLD, Beijing, China, September 19-22, 2000

• The design earthquake (DE) or safety evaluation earthquake (SEE)

occurs very seldom, i.e. every 475 years when the DE is used. Sorenson S.P., Meyer K.J. (2003): Effect of the Denali Fault Rupture on the

However, for safety-relevant elements like the bottom outlet, which Trans-Alaska Pipeline, Proc. Sixth U.S. Conference and Workshop on

Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, ASCE Technical Council on Lifeline

must function after an earthquake, the SEE with a return period

Earthquake Engineering, Long Beach, CA, August

of say 10,000 years has to be taken into account.

24 OCTOBER 2005 INTERNATIONAL WATER POWER & DAM CONSTRUCTION

- 1 Dynamics+of+Structures 12.7Uploaded byHelber Garcia
- 20150075.fullUploaded byAndré Biscaya
- Nuevo Metodo Para Obtener Velocidad y Desplazamiento Basado en Acelerograma Sin Condiciones InicialesUploaded bycontrerasc_sebastian988
- tv_21_2014_3_599_608Uploaded byGyanashekar K Shekar
- .Nonlinear Dynamics of Mechanical Systems With Friction Contacts by HBMUploaded byGerald Sequeira
- Vibration Characteristics of Double Tee Building FloorsUploaded byHugo Verissimo
- Paper 20Uploaded byho-fa
- CA Aa242b Ch2Uploaded byRipani King Street
- Free Vibe SummaryUploaded byAnandan Ponnusamy
- Civil Sem-7Uploaded byFullMoon N R
- Dynamics_FreeVibrationUploaded byEko Feri Budi
- Design PenstockUploaded bysunchitk
- EM71 -Some Thoughts on Vibration ReductionUploaded byChad Hunt
- 01Uploaded byAbdul Khaliq Khan
- Vibration-Isolation-and-Transmissibility-by-www-engineering-me-uk.pdfUploaded byalfavector
- 950464Uploaded byuamiranda3518
- Variable Velocity Exponential Input Shaping for Position Controlled Robotic SystemsUploaded byTony Ngo
- 6ME4 Noise, Vibration and Harshness (Old) (1)Uploaded byडॉ. कनिष्क शर्मा
- Bucher and Ewins ROSUploaded byC V CHANDRASHEKARA
- Whats Newb fgdfUploaded byHumayun Nawaz
- sdof-dynUploaded byAnkur Kurmi
- CPCI Design Manual 4 Errata 8-5-08Uploaded byMahmoud Shaker
- Investigation on structural and aerodynamic characteristics of resonant type elastic flapping wing.pdfUploaded byMary Lum
- IRJET-Comparison of Seismic Behavior of Building with Fixed Base, Base Isolator and Shear WallUploaded byIRJET Journal
- RSA Using SpreadsheetUploaded byCY Lee
- a107412101-Vibrations and Structural Dynamics_1st MidUploaded byanjaiah_19945
- My Mdv FinalUploaded bykk
- COMPARISON OF RESPONSE TO UNBALANCE OF OVERHUNG ROTOR SYSTEM FOR DIFFERENT SUPPORTSUploaded byIAEME Publication
- Mechanical VibrationsUploaded byguptaranjeet40
- Eqstatic MUploaded byRamchandra

- CH-08-Preheating & Post heating.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- 07MnMoVR steel chn786s1_t.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- 2_07-modal.pptUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- AWC-DA6-Beam Formula.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- AWS Level II - Advanced Welder - - Guide for the Training and Qualification of Welding Personnel.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- CH-08-Preheating & Post heating.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- Accumulator capacity.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- Ansys-Tips.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- Fasteners.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- 19_BeamElements.pptxUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- CHE507R.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- 19_BeamElements.pptxUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- Pressure Vessel Example ansys apdl.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- 2 Basic-Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- 000632.pptUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- ISO 1940-1 Balancing.docxUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- Francis runner analysis using FEM.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- 978-1-58503-754-4-1 WB.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- Strength Analysis of Bifurcation WienSeminar-WH-stressUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- reworld20160910-dl.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- Pen StocksUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- Straight through labyrinth types and influence on leakage.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- Air Carbon Arc Gouging DataUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- is.10210.1993 Hoist design critera.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- Bolt Ddesign_2ndEditionGuide.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- Beam_Examples02.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- Penstocks.pdfUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- Cast Materials From KSB-DataUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy
- turbine shaft.docUploaded byAnonymous AkzeMHNTUy