Sta 0+000

Zaky Prawira, S.T

Analysis of reinforced slopes
Input data
Project
Task : Sta 0+000
Descript. : Jalan Tol Pasuruan Probolinggo
Author : Zaky Prawira, S.T
Customer : PT. WASKITA TOLL ROAD
Date : 11/6/2016
Settings
USA - Safety factor
Materials and standards
Concrete structures : ACI 318-11
Wall analysis
Active earth pressure calculation : Coulomb
Passive earth pressure calculation : Mazindrani (Rankin)
Earthquake analysis : Mononobe-Okabe
Shape of earth wedge : Calculate as skew
Internal stability : Standard - straight slip surface
Verification methodology : Safety factors (ASD)
Safety factors
Permanent design situation
Safety factor for overturning : SFo = 1.50 [–]
Safety factor for sliding resistance : SFs = 1.50 [–]
Safety factor for bearing capacity : SFb = 2.00 [–]
Safety factor for sliding along geo-reinforcement : SFsr = 1.50 [–]
Safety factor for geo-reinforcement strength : SFst = 1.50 [–]
Safety factor for pull out resistance of geo-reinf. : SFpo = 1.50 [–]
Stability analysis
Verification methodology : Safety factors (ASD)
Safety factors
Permanent design situation
Safety factor : SFs = 1.50 [–]
Geometry of structure
Embankment height Embankment length Terrace length With Cover thickness
No.
hn[m] ln[m] lt[m] cover tc[m]
1 5.00 0.20 NO
2 3.05 3.66 2.74 NO
Material
Types of reinforcements
Type of
Name Line type Reinforcement strength Coefficient
No. reinforcement
Tult[kN/m] Rt[kN/m] Cds[–] Ci[–]
Geo Reinfox 70 kN/m2
1 user-defined 70.00 58.00 0.60 0.70
(user)

1
[GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.16.14.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol. s r.o. All Rights Reserved | www.finesoftware.eu]

42 0. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira. All Rights Reserved | www. 1 Reinforcement type : Geo Reinfox 70 kN/m2 (user) Number of reinforcements 8 Reinforcement geometry : identical length of reinforcements Reinforcement length : 10.16.54 3.00 kPa Angle of friction struc.00 ° Saturated unit weight : sat = 22.o.60 10.00 kN/m3 Angle of internal friction : ef = 0.00 ° Cohesion of soil : cef = 30.00 ° Cohesion of soil : cef = 0.-soil :  = 0.43 3.50 2.58 3.-soil :  = 10.80 10.20 10.00 6 -6.60 3.00 m Reinforcement Origin End Height from bottom Length No.00 10.57 4.eu] .00 10.46 3. reinforcement of hr[m] h[m] reinforcements 1 8 Geo Reinfox 70 kN/m2 (user) 0.00 identical length of reinforcements Reinforcement details Reinforcement No. S.52 3.60 10.00 3 -6.00 kN/m Long-term design strength Rt = 58. s r.-soil :  = 0.00 kPa Angle of friction struc.53 3.55 3.00 4 -6.00 5 -6.00 ° Saturated unit weight : sat = 20.00 kN/m Reinforcement Height of Spacing of Number Type of reinforcement first Reinforcements geometry reinforcements No.40 0.47 1.48 3.40 10.00 kN/m3   Clay1 Unit weight :  = 17.00 2 -6.00 ° Saturated unit weight : sat = 19.T Reinforcement details 1.00 Soil parameters Timbunan Unit weight :  = 20.14.20 10.60 0.00 8 -6.00 ° Cohesion of soil : cef = 20.00 kN/m3   Sand Unit weight :  = 18.00 kN/m3 2 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5. strength Tult = 70.00 kN/m3 Angle of internal friction : ef = 45.45 1.finesoftware. l 1[m] l 2[m] h[m] l[m] 1 -6.00 7 -6. Geo Reinfox 70 kN/m2 (user) Short-term char.00 kPa Angle of friction struc.50 3.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.00 kN/m3 Angle of internal friction : ef = 25.

95 Clay1 3 8.T   Geological profile and assigned soils Layer No.Pt.000 Verification of complete wall Check for overturning stability Resisting moment Mres = 8470.000 Load 26.   Water influence Ground water table is not considered.88 10.29 > 1.finesoftware. All Rights Reserved | www.2 Ord. s r.000 Active pressure 78. Assigned soil Pattern [m] 1 8. Action new change [kN/m2] [kN/m2] x [m] l [m] z [m] 1 YES permanent 15. S. Name 1 Load Resistance on front face of the structure Resistance on front face of the structure is not considered.   Input surface surcharges Surcharge Mag.13 1.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.Pt.39 kNm/m Overturning moment Movr = 205. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira.50 Wall for overturning is SATISFACTORY 3 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.   Settings of the stage of construction Design situation : permanent   Verification No.00 Sand 4 .79 16.eu] .16.00 -3.70 32.000 Load 0.45 1328.03 -1.o.05 53.x Length Depth No.1 Mag.07 1.05 Timbunan 2 3.00 on terrain No.14.00 -8. Fvert App. Timbunan Terrain profile Terrain behind the structure is flat.14 kNm/m Safety factor = 41.38 1.68 5.80 10.66 1. 1 Forces acting on construction Name Fhor App.51 8.08 -2. Design [kN/m] z [m] [kN/m] x [m] coefficient Gravity force 0.

78 ° 2 = 87.89 1431. S.00 143. All Rights Reserved | www.10 kN/m Overall check .0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.19 Bearing capacity of foundation soil check Eccentricity verification Max.WALL is SATISFACTORY   Bearing capacity of foundation soil Forces acting at the centre of the footing bottom Moment Norm.-0.14.bearing capacity of found.T Check for slip Resisting horizontal force Hres = 867.10 kN/m Safety factor = 8. force Shear Force Eccentricity Stress No.00 kPa Safety factor = 0.00 Bearing capacity of foundation soil is NOT SATISFACTORY Overall verification . eccentricity of normal force e = 0.87 kN/m Shear force Q = 104.53) m Radius r = 12. soil is NOT SATISFACTORY   Global stability analysis No.58 ° Analysis has not been performed.0 mm Eccentricity of the normal force is SATISFACTORY Footing bottom bearing capacity verification Max.16. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira. 1 Paremeters of inputted slip surface Center S = (-3.33 > 1.87 104.19 kPa Bearing capacity of foundation soil Rd = 0.69 kN/m Active horizontal force Hact = 104. [kNm/m] [kN/m] [kN/m] [m] [kPa] 1 -1105.10 0.53 m Angle 1 = -46. stress at footing bottom  = 143.50 Wall for slip is SATISFACTORY Forces acting at the centre of footing bottom Overall moment M = -1105.o.0 mm Maximum allowable eccentricity ealw = 3300.89 kNm/m Normal force N = 1431.   Slope stability analysis Input data Project Settings USA .eu] .17.finesoftware. s r.00 < 2.Safety factor Stability analysis Verification methodology : Safety factors (ASD) 4 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.

05 1 -0.00 6.05 21.00 2 Clay1 0.30 -16. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira.95 4 Soil parameters .o. All Rights Reserved | www.00 17.finesoftware.effective stress state ef cef  No.00 2 -7.13 -8.16.00 0.00 30.eu] .95 21.00 18.30 -5. Interface location x z x z x z -7.95 21.95 21.00 -0. S. s r.40 -16.00 5 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.40 3.00 21. Name Pattern [°] [kPa] [kN/m3] 1 Timbunan 25.00 3 Sand 45.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.00 20.20 -5.13 -5.00 21.95 21.T Safety factors Permanent design situation Safety factor : SFs = 1.00 0.00 2.30 -8.40 -5.40 3.00 0.13 -16.74 0.95 3 -7.00 20.20 -5.40 -8.50 [–] Interface Coordinates of interface points [m] No.14.

00 kN/m3   Clay1 Unit weight :  = 17. All Rights Reserved | www.eu] .00 kN/m3 Stress-state : effective Angle of internal friction : ef = 25.finesoftware. s r.00 kN/m3 Stress-state : effective Angle of internal friction : ef = 45.56 6 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira.14.00 ° Cohesion of soil : cef = 0.00 ° Cohesion of soil : cef = 30.00 Soil parameters Timbunan Unit weight :  = 20.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.00 kPa Saturated unit weight : sat = 19.uplift sat s n No.00 kN/m3 Stress-state : effective Angle of internal friction : ef = 0.00 kPa Saturated unit weight : sat = 20.00 kN/m3   Rigid bodies  No.00 ° Cohesion of soil : cef = 20.16.o.00 2 Clay1 19.T Soil parameters .00 3 Sand 20. Name Pattern [kN/m3] [kN/m3] [–] 1 Timbunan 22. Name Sample [kN/m3] 1 Material of cover 23.00 kPa Saturated unit weight : sat = 22. S.00 kN/m3   Sand Unit weight :  = 18.

Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira.16 kN/m2 4 -0.finesoftware.05 6.00 0.30 -8.95 3 21.13 -16.30 -16.95 4 Reinforcements Point to the left Point to the right Length Strength No.20 -5.06 -1.00 -7.95 21. All Rights Reserved | www.13 -5.95 -7.92 -2.20 -5.13 -21.40 3.30 -16.T Assigning and surfaces Coordinates of surface points [m] Assigned No.05 2.60 10.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.00 Tp = 94.95 Timbunan -7.95 2 21.40 -21.40 -5.80 9. Surface position x z x z soil 21.00 58.95 21.00 21.30 -8.60 9.03 -0.00 1 21. Pull out resist. s r.00 Tp = 105.13 -16.80 10.00 -7.o.00 58.30 -5.40 -16.40 -8.00 Timbunan 21.08 -2.40 10.00 0.40 3.95 21.14.35 kN/m2 7 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.90 -2.95 Clay1 21. S.40 -5.40 9.00 21.30 -5.40 -16.00 58.74 0.00 -0.16.00 10.00 -0.13 -8.95 -7.95 Sand 21.77 kN/m2 2 -0.95 21.95 -7.13 -8.00 Tp = 71.97 kN/m2 3 -0.97 -0.00 58.95 21.00 Tp = 82.40 -8.10 -2.00 9.eu] .94 -1. x [m] z [m] x [m] z [m] L [m] Rt [kN/m] 1 -0.

finesoftware.18 -4.00 Tp = 150.00 Tp = 138.eu] . Type Type of action z [m] x [m] l [m] b [m]  [°] q.00 3 0.21 [m] The slip surface after optimization.40 9.85 -3.00 58.40 0. Earthquake Earthquake not included.16.20 -5. Pull out resist.11 kN/m2 Surcharge Location Origin Length Width Slope Magnitude No. Reinforcement forces Reinforcement Force [kN/m] 1 0.00 kN/m2 Surcharges No.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.00 6 0.50 Slope stability NOT ACCEPTABLE Optimization of circular slip surface (Janbu) 8 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.00 9.80 9.80 10.73 kN/m2 7 -0.00 7 0.15 -3.00 Tp = 116. Settings of the stage of construction Design situation : permanent Results (Stage of construction 1) Analysis 1 Circular slip surface Slip surface parameters x= 2.05 < 1. x [m] z [m] x [m] z [m] L [m] Rt [kN/m] 5 -0.49 [m] 1 = -45.00 2 0. f. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira. Name 1 Load Water Water type : No water Tensile crack Tensile crack not inputted.o. s r.00 58.87 -3.00 Slope stability verification (Janbu) Factor of safety = 1.54 kN/m2 6 -0.80 -5.20 9.14.43 [°] Center : Angles : z= 4. All Rights Reserved | www.00 8 0.00 5 0.13 -3. S.00 15.40 10.27 [m] 2 = 84.00 58.92 kN/m2 8 -0.00 58. q1.82 -4.70 [°] Radius : R= 13.00 Tp = 127.00 l = 21. F q2 unit 1 strip permanent on terrain x = 0.00 4 0.00 10.T Point to the left Point to the right Length Strength No.20 10.

05 47.75 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 46 5.eu] .88 85.89 16.28 15.06 13.78 10.27 NOT ACCEPTABLE 11 4.86 6.48 7.30 3.06 75.31 NOT ACCEPTABLE 49 3.62 12.22 ACCEPTABLE 4 1.86 ACCEPTABLE 36 2.53 ACCEPTABLE 13 -8.68 434.67 7.80 ACCEPTABLE 5 8.52 ACCEPTABLE 6 3.74 5.48 13.77 5. S.75 20.66 ACCEPTABLE 33 4.43 3.94 27.74 ACCEPTABLE 23 -8.21 12.27 NOT ACCEPTABLE 41 -1.48 13.85 1.42 ACCEPTABLE 19 -0.25 .27 NOT ACCEPTABLE 45 2.T Center Radius No.01 ACCEPTABLE 9 -2.37 4.13 .10 6.30 1.86 ACCEPTABLE 9 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.32 27.18 13.19 NOT ACCEPTABLE 18 -16.34 5.11 32.37 4.28 1.37 4.96 19.48 13.37 4.53 13.64 14.44 1.27 4.27 9.27 1.48 13.66 15.48 5.43 ACCEPTABLE 27 -2. All Rights Reserved | www.01 1.20 12.01 ACCEPTABLE 10 3.48 13.84 3.20 NOT ACCEPTABLE 16 3.43 6.14.41 14.86 6.32 7.72 18.25 ACCEPTABLE 32 -3.82 10.08 NOT ACCEPTABLE 50 3.48 13.95 15.33 14.43 31.75 5.04 4.11 NOT ACCEPTABLE 44 6.finesoftware.18 13.14 NOT ACCEPTABLE 39 3.98 79.90 1.14 ACCEPTABLE 47 0. Solution not found 3 -13.00 4.84 125.58 ACCEPTABLE 22 -5.87 16.31 4.o.70 6.46 4.18 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 37 2.64 17.05 1.07 9.15 NOT ACCEPTABLE 34 8.22 16.00 79.41 1.03 ACCEPTABLE 12 7.47 ACCEPTABLE 21 8.45 3.18 3.88 2.28 1.14 3.72 14.59 ACCEPTABLE 31 -3.65 7.41 39.58 482.28 11.83 1.12 4.20 20.15 ACCEPTABLE 24 1.71 4. Solution not found 25 2.43 5.46 4.74 3.66 54.23 70.25 ACCEPTABLE 43 3. FS Verification x [m] z [m] R [m] 1 2.23 20.41 26.83 7. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira.75 3.18 1.91 4.57 1.36 12.97 ACCEPTABLE 28 4.28 1. Solution not found 2 2.79 85.72 10.43 5.74 37.47 ACCEPTABLE 15 1.28 20.13 .19 ACCEPTABLE 42 0.00 4.02 14.70 15.24 ACCEPTABLE 14 -16.83 ACCEPTABLE 38 3.16.28 1.07 2.63 1. s r.81 3.28 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 26 -15.23 NOT ACCEPTABLE 7 8.12 ACCEPTABLE 20 4.69 5.71 34.69 17.20 1.89 6.10 20.40 39.15 118.41 4.33 20.34 34.97 5.58 1.68 7.98 16.03 ACCEPTABLE 30 8.15 3.01 13.62 37.44 ACCEPTABLE 29 4.11 15.43 ACCEPTABLE 40 6.10 4.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.25 NOT ACCEPTABLE 17 3.38 1.73 32.33 4.15 12.41 8.07 ACCEPTABLE 8 -27.69 32.95 1.55 ACCEPTABLE 48 2.24 16.38 1.21 ACCEPTABLE 35 -206.

Solution not found 97 3.37 4.04 4.78 ACCEPTABLE 98 2.53 5. Solution not found 87 2.36 3.21 NOT ACCEPTABLE 61 2.03 4. Solution not found 60 1.00 12.55 1.95 17.08 15.21 3.98 4.55 1.80 6.78 ACCEPTABLE 57 -228.65 ACCEPTABLE 54 3.78 580. Solution not found 78 2.28 1.48 13.T Center Radius No. Solution not found 70 2.34 777.30 NOT ACCEPTABLE 67 1.48 13.65 ACCEPTABLE 66 0.41 .96 .35 5.62 5. Solution not found 82 1.79 5.19 13.62 1.43 .75 13.99 .47 14.73 13.71 15. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira.12 ACCEPTABLE 81 2.13 .57 ACCEPTABLE 73 2.75 13.70 ACCEPTABLE 53 1. Solution not found 63 3.93 ACCEPTABLE 58 2. Solution not found 52 -0.48 13. Solution not found 72 -265.75 .07 6.44 12.74 13.18 NOT ACCEPTABLE 62 2.89 15. FS Verification x [m] z [m] R [m] 51 4.01 5.95 14.16.69 5.40 1.48 4.42 1.51 .72 6.45 14.92 .81 15.28 1.88 7.39 5.58 14.39 11.56 13.48 13.11 NOT ACCEPTABLE 84 1.04 6.37 4.08 NOT ACCEPTABLE 55 4. Solution not found 75 1. Solution not found 88 3.81 5.93 ACCEPTABLE 86 2.36 7.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.82 7.97 . All Rights Reserved | www.63 5.45 7. Solution not found 79 3. Solution not found 89 -241.08 NOT ACCEPTABLE 80 3.61 14.01 810. Solution not found 64 4.94 4. Solution not found 95 2. Solution not found 96 2.10 6.54 12.48 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 93 3.09 11.o.50 3.97 3.97 697.92 13.11 NOT ACCEPTABLE 10 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.45 3.41 4.97 697.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 99 3.78 3.05 .87 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 74 3. Solution not found 83 2. Solution not found 71 3.41 .07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 94 2. Solution not found 77 2.45 8.28 .28 .91 1.81 5.17 12.14.26 1.42 1.65 4. Solution not found 100 2.09 626.45 13. Solution not found 69 1.84 13.19 855.35 .84 651.78 4.40 .74 6.04 ACCEPTABLE 91 -240.37 4.30 5. Solution not found 65 3.63 13.80 12.71 3.80 12.62 14.74 13.82 2.29 .44 ACCEPTABLE 90 -260.28 1.74 7.69 13.07 8.26 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 59 3.92 3.79 3.09 626.finesoftware.11 13.28 580.51 9.09 11.17 1.21 1.95 651.20 .28 1.33 .68 . s r.25 1.85 5. S.38 4.11 14.14 NOT ACCEPTABLE 76 2.66 ACCEPTABLE 92 2.04 9.07 3.33 3.79 1. Solution not found 85 2.15 NOT ACCEPTABLE 56 -230.02 4.40 1.00 822.27 NOT ACCEPTABLE 68 1.48 13.67 .24 1.96 13.38 .14 14.eu] .76 .41 .40 12.

46 ACCEPTABLE 146 2. Solution not found 125 2.59 5.56 5.96 .08 NOT ACCEPTABLE 129 2.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.T Center Radius No.88 .09 NOT ACCEPTABLE 110 2.46 13. Solution not found 148 2.90 12.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 117 3.28 1.25 .66 . Solution not found 105 3.26 3.89 13.72 3.88 .38 4. Solution not found 113 2.19 5. Solution not found 120 1.61 1.71 13.07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 141 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 134 3.27 12.75 12.93 .79 .27 1.35 ACCEPTABLE 135 2.97 5. Solution not found 106 3.95 .91 13.24 4.90 6.84 13. Solution not found 103 3.81 13.22 12. Solution not found 145 2.24 13.81 5. S.27 1.20 4.69 .38 4.10 NOT ACCEPTABLE 102 2.56 4.28 13.82 13.75 .60 12.84 ACCEPTABLE 107 2.o.63 12. All Rights Reserved | www.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 149 2.70 1.56 14.76 .40 ACCEPTABLE 138 2. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira.93 ACCEPTABLE 104 2. Solution not found 132 2.70 5.93 4.29 3.81 2.79 1.48 4.38 4.59 1.15 . Solution not found 114 2.14.12 4.86 3.56 2.81 4.66 12.99 13.92 13.30 2.07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 140 2. Solution not found 144 2.81 2.54 12.46 13.30 2.43 5.59 13. Solution not found 123 2.27 12.03 4.eu] .93 5.46 13.01 12.63 5.73 14.46 ACCEPTABLE 143 2.76 13.85 12.11 4.46 13.74 12.66 4.07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 133 2.54 5.55 .10 13.49 .59 12.17 3. Solution not found 108 1.12 .07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 118 3.32 1.79 ACCEPTABLE 116 2.83 12.29 1.02 3. s r.41 12.68 1.39 1.05 13. FS Verification x [m] z [m] R [m] 101 2.07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 121 2.52 3. Solution not found 147 2.07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 150 2.16 12.49 .36 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 136 2.51 3.08 6.64 3.98 12.27 1.30 4.52 3.46 13.73 1.57 13.53 3.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 111 3.27 1.73 ACCEPTABLE 119 2.52 4.37 14.08 NOT ACCEPTABLE 122 2.77 1.13 13.24 4.30 1.59 3.34 1.56 2.81 14.38 12.31 .96 2.06 4.83 1. Solution not found 128 3.08 NOT ACCEPTABLE 109 2.13 3.finesoftware.83 4.62 13.17 4.16.11 13.60 3.93 1.52 1.32 14.20 .07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 112 2. Solution not found 139 1.40 NOT ACCEPTABLE 124 2.66 13.80 4. Solution not found 115 3.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 11 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.82 .04 12. Solution not found 126 2.34 13. Solution not found 142 2.07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 131 2.56 3.59 .32 2.78 3. Solution not found 127 2.07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 137 2.89 13.87 4.27 1.39 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 130 2.

88 3.00 11.28 1.33 13.55 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 153 2.16.78 2.95 ACCEPTABLE 159 2.55 746.46 NOT ACCEPTABLE 182 2.71 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 180 2.14 12.26 13. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira.56 13.09 12.74 13.95 ACCEPTABLE 156 2.42 1.07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 175 2.02 700.34 1.09 12.00 9.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 177 2.55 746.58 1.94 1. All Rights Reserved | www.03 ACCEPTABLE 168 2.27 1.45 3.60 13.51 13.19 13.46 4. Solution not found 160 2.84 13.98 13.99 ACCEPTABLE 165 2.04 1.45 3.48 3.07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 154 2.50 1.07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 161 2.46 13.38 4.46 4.27 1.51 1.57 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 186 2.06 12.87 725.27 13.04 13.50 ACCEPTABLE 188 2.94 .77 10.27 1.29 4.54 13.03 ACCEPTABLE 173 2.64 1. Solution not found 169 2.47 4.78 . Solution not found 193 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 152 2.44 4.30 4.30 1.18 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 178 2.46 4.25 770. s r.27 1.82 13.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.26 5.31 1.91 12.01 .06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 184 2.10 .65 13.48 1.28 ACCEPTABLE 197 -249.27 1.54 13.03 ACCEPTABLE 164 2.53 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 158 2. Solution not found 189 2.78 731.99 12.T Center Radius No.07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 185 2.58 4. S.o.65 12.48 3.42 NOT ACCEPTABLE 179 2.78 12.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 200 2.79 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 171 2.94 1.44 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 194 2.30 5.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 157 2.91 12.13 1.05 ACCEPTABLE 196 -252.32 1.24 700.14 13.70 13.32 4.07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 172 -253.12 1.46 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 195 -249.53 3.52 13.26 4. Solution not found 166 2.56 1.29 1.19 12.55 10.32 4.38 4.08 4.82 .66 13.47 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 174 2.46 13.59 3.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 181 2.60 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 176 2.46 12.48 4.65 ACCEPTABLE 191 2.97 .06 1.12 1.87 ACCEPTABLE 198 2.04 13.28 13.50 5.07 .50 4.34 13.eu] .65 12.97 .65 ACCEPTABLE 187 2.59 13. Solution not found 167 2.67 4.84 1.44 4.finesoftware.66 4.50 776.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 155 2.27 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 12 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.78 2.50 3. FS Verification x [m] z [m] R [m] 151 2. Solution not found 192 2.05 .14.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 162 2.75 13.90 12.22 13.92 .29 4. Solution not found 170 2.54 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 199 2.75 . Solution not found 183 2.50 4.56 4.33 4.34 4.71 4.65 13.18 4.69 3.28 1.46 13.45 1.84 13.45 1. Solution not found 163 2.32 4. Solution not found 190 2.42 4.68 4.

 s r.25 1.54 4.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.07 NOT ACCEPTABLE 206 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 213 2.16.41 1.51 1.63 750.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 210 2.45 4.o.29 ACCEPTABLE 226 -249.46 4.57 1.62 13.43 1.78 13.34 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 239 2.44 4.45 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 212 2.27 1.41 1.71 13.41 1.39 1.48 13.T Center Radius No.17 1.40 13.41 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 209 2.54 4.84 704.49 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 241 2.33 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 228 2.09 13.36 5.53 1.79 13.06 10.32 4.31 1.31 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 240 2.44 4.37 4.43 1.62 13.26 721.19 1.01 13.88 13.06 10.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 245 2.38 4.59 4.27 1.47 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 211 2.53 13.65 1.46 4.23 13.26 1.finesoftware.29 1.39 4.41 4.70 704.41 1.75 13.25 13.50 1.42 13.56 13.66 13.37 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 235 2.54 13.05 ACCEPTABLE 227 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 204 2.41 13.64 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 208 2.67 13.69 13.47 4.38 4.39 13.44 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 230 2.08 .06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 236 2.63 4.44 1.73 13. Solution not found 217 2.49 13.71 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 222 2.54 13. FS Verification x [m] z [m] R [m] 201 2.62 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 205 2.43 10.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 231 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 207 2.53 1.21 1.70 13.50 4.48 1.28 4.53 13.50 4.34 1.44 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 223 2.67 4.56 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 237 2.13 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 214 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 220 2.21 1.45 4.48 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 215 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 234 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 238 2.63 750.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 229 2. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira.46 4.25 13.49 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 224 -249.41 4.55 4.27 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 232 2.18 1.14.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 219 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 244 2.eu] .10 766.56 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 202 2.44 4.52 4.48 4.16 13.38 4.45 13.55 4.74 4.34 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 249 2.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 250 2.18 1.41 1.63 4.50 13.51 4.19 1.74 13.41 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 216 2.41 1.39 13. All Rights Reserved | www.68 13.41 1.73 ACCEPTABLE 13 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.27 13.62 13.88 13.43 4.49 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 221 2.41 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 233 2.48 13.62 13.36 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 248 2.34 1.53 4.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 247 2.31 1.46 4.79 ACCEPTABLE 225 -252.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 246 2.55 1.41 4.66 13.34 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 218 2.37 13.37 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 242 2.45 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 243 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 203 2. S.

06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 283 2.25 1.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 284 2.55 4. All Rights Reserved | www.18 13.05 .20 1. Solution not found 281 2.29 .16.62 4.23 ACCEPTABLE 269 -251.35 13.62 4.29 13.49 4.25 13.62 4.37 13.20 1.14.68 4.04 1.50 4.66 4.06 .25 1.20 1.44 13.24 1.11 . Solution not found 293 2.46 13.21 13.29 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 285 2.99 13.68 3.32 1.34 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 257 2.69 4.25 13.37 13.26 13.26 13.62 4.27 1.46 13.67 4.23 NOT ACCEPTABLE 262 2.60 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 295 2.56 4.17 13.63 4.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 296 2.34 13.58 4.57 4.80 ACCEPTABLE 259 2.25 13. s r.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 298 2.47 NOT ACCEPTABLE 280 2.37 13.35 13.33 1.67 4.23 13.50 4.33 761.finesoftware. FS Verification x [m] z [m] R [m] 251 2.20 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 294 2.83 ACCEPTABLE 260 2.98 1.28 13.29 13.11 13.68 10.40 NOT ACCEPTABLE 261 2.o.16 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 267 -251.18 13.38 772.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 279 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 299 2.20 1.57 4.05 13.16 1.50 4.44 4.35 1.16 1. Solution not found 265 2.61 ACCEPTABLE 268 -253.07 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 275 2.30 1.37 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 273 2.41 NOT ACCEPTABLE 277 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 258 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 282 2.67 10.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 288 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 274 2.11 .12 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 297 2.59 4.11 1.26 13.55 4.T Center Radius No.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 286 2.55 4.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 272 2.60 4.29 .26 13.23 13.80 ACCEPTABLE 254 2.17 1.46 4. S.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 300 2. Solution not found 290 2.40 NOT ACCEPTABLE 289 2.40 NOT ACCEPTABLE 14 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.25 1.62 4. Solution not found 278 2.23 13.21 1.68 10.25 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 276 2.51 4.18 1. Solution not found 255 2.59 4.64 4.54 4.25 1.62 3.19 727.15 1.56 4.34 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 253 2.19 1.57 716.20 1.18 13.20 NOT ACCEPTABLE 252 2.47 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 256 2.30 1.51 4. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira.19 NOT ACCEPTABLE 264 2.10 ACCEPTABLE 270 2.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 271 2.47 NOT ACCEPTABLE 292 2.56 4.37 13.04 1.24 1.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.93 12.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 266 2.17 13.35 1.15 1.53 4.25 13.28 13.71 4.37 13.25 1.64 4.47 716.37 13.09 13.69 4.35 13.19 1.54 4.66 4.74 4.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 291 2.59 4.17 13.21 1.83 ACCEPTABLE 263 2.19 1.21 1.32 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 287 2.33 761.26 13.61 4.21 13.61 4.eu] .26 1.

48 10.28 1.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 321 2.21 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 317 -250.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 332 2.54 4.16 1.28 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 347 2.52 4.50 4.47 4.51 4.28 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 339 2.48 757.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 316 2.25 1.84 712.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 302 2.23 13.50 4.49 4.50 4.21 1.14. Solution not found 337 2.25 1.23 13.14 .30 13. Solution not found 311 2.48 4.15 13.10 .17 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 341 2.17 1.27 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 327 2.52 4.19 13.37 NOT ACCEPTABLE 338 2.50 4.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 324 2.14 763.80 ACCEPTABLE 320 2.37 NOT ACCEPTABLE 334 2.20 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 306 2.47 4.13 .28 13. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira.22 1.20 1.24 13.05 713.48 4.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 328 2.27 1.86 9.finesoftware.54 4.47 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 314 2.46 NOT ACCEPTABLE 310 2.47 4.15 13.14 .o.56 4.86 10.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 303 2.32 13.15 1.06 1.20 13.44 NOT ACCEPTABLE 309 2.51 4.53 4. Solution not found 330 2.20 13.18 .25 758.16 .16 9.21 1.11 .06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 307 2.31 13.38 13.23 1.26 13.54 4. s r.52 4.20 1.21 1.33 13.26 13.27 13.13 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 342 -251. Solution not found 315 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 308 2.30 13.33 13.62 10.24 13.27 13.12 1.18 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 349 2.54 4.51 4.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 323 2. Solution not found 305 2.13 13. S. FS Verification x [m] z [m] R [m] 301 2.35 13.22 13.56 4.46 4.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 325 2. Solution not found 15 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.10 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 331 2.48 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 348 2.10 1.52 4.31 13.52 4.50 NOT ACCEPTABLE 313 2.15 1.35 NOT ACCEPTABLE 329 2. Solution not found 340 2.18 13.10 1.18 NOT ACCEPTABLE 335 2.16.13 ACCEPTABLE 318 -251.19 1.45 4.22 13.17 1.53 ACCEPTABLE 343 -251.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 346 2.41 ACCEPTABLE 344 -251.06 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 350 2. All Rights Reserved | www.54 4.51 4.10 .98 719.26 13.25 1.24 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 336 2.20 13.91 712.eu] .50 4.17 1.20 1.21 13.09 713.52 4.57 4.25 758.82 765.33 13.T Center Radius No.50 4.19 NOT ACCEPTABLE 326 2.48 757.49 4.52 4.31 13.57 4.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 333 2.26 1.85 ACCEPTABLE 319 -250.18 1.81 718. Solution not found 312 2.25 13.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.51 4.26 1.62 10.22 1.22 13.17 13.47 4.47 NOT ACCEPTABLE 304 2.26 13.49 4.31 13.21 1.22 1.52 4.11 13.54 4.43 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 322 2.32 ACCEPTABLE 345 2.20 1.

19 1.49 4.30 13.28 13.18 .27 13.48 4.21 1.20 1.26 13.25 13.51 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 365 2.50 4.28 13.20 1.53 4.51 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 363 2.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 359 2.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 396 2.29 13.24 1.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 392 2.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 362 2.19 NOT ACCEPTABLE 354 2.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 369 2.49 4.52 4.50 4.50 4.24 13.32 762.48 4.25 13. Solution not found 398 2.46 4.18 .17 1.49 4.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 353 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 386 2.06 759.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 384 2. S.30 13.22 1.25 13.27 13.50 4.22 1.19 NOT ACCEPTABLE 367 2. Solution not found 397 2.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 358 2.43 10.19 1.22 1.24 1.22 13.23 13.48 4.30 13.46 4.50 4.67 10.21 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 355 2.31 13.21 13.16.24 13.19 1.50 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 390 2.24 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 393 2.19 1.23 13.16 .06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 352 2.35 13.50 4.21 1.23 1.52 4.51 4.26 1.finesoftware.20 1. s r.35 ACCEPTABLE 382 -251.27 13.21 1.21 1.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 380 -251.19 1. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 364 2.28 13.23 13.20 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 395 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 361 2.49 4.32 13.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 399 2.17 .27 13.25 1.51 4. Solution not found 400 2.48 4.24 13.29 13.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 356 2.21 1.28 ACCEPTABLE 383 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 388 2. Solution not found 378 2.21 NOT ACCEPTABLE 373 2.o.43 10.20 13.49 4.49 4.50 4.29 13.51 4.26 13. Solution not found 375 2.18 1.27 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 394 2.29 13.26 13.23 1.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 391 2.47 4.23 13.24 1.47 4.T Center Radius No.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 16 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 357 2.22 1.25 13.18 13.69 717.15 1.06 759.52 4.23 1.50 4.18 NOT ACCEPTABLE 372 2.21 714.50 4. All Rights Reserved | www.52 4.26 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 360 2.21 1.51 4.20 1.28 13.22 1.49 4.32 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 366 2.21 1. Solution not found 368 2.18 714.25 13.48 4.48 4.47 4.49 4.26 13.17 .53 4.16 1.eu] .30 13.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 377 2.22 1.50 4.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 379 2.14.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 387 2.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 371 2.17 1.17 .19 NOT ACCEPTABLE 376 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 370 2.43 ACCEPTABLE 381 -251.20 1.27 13.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 374 2.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 385 2.24 1. FS Verification x [m] z [m] R [m] 351 2.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol.30 13.50 4.49 4.18 1.20 1.48 4.51 4.22 13.49 4.20 1.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 389 2.

21 1.48 4.0 | Copyright © 2013 Fine spol. Solution not found 403 2.18 .05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 402 2.43 ACCEPTABLE 408 2.27 13.21 1.53 762.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 405 -251.51 4. Sta 0+000 Zaky Prawira.16.74 717.27 13.20 1.14.40 715.24 13.54 ACCEPTABLE 406 -251.43 ACCEPTABLE 407 -251.49 4. S. All Rights Reserved | www.23 1.T Center Radius No.35 760.49 4.o.06 NOT ACCEPTABLE 404 2.50 4.88 10.29 13.71 10.finesoftware. s r.35 760.05 NOT ACCEPTABLE 17 [GeoStructural Analysis - MSE Wall | version 5.26 13.eu] .42 715. FS Verification x [m] z [m] R [m] 401 2.71 10.