0/^

Ers^i, varol (*22)

Rc'iJnd 2A 7;30pm Room 3109 Judge's Name:
Gov; 12 Ganguli - Sanghvi
Opp; 8 Khan - Sharma
Parli Debate
Judge's School AfBliation:_

PROP OPP
Team Code #: Team Code #:

Prop Speaker #1^ pts. Opp Speaker#! pts_

Prop Speaker
C
4>ts. Opp Speaker #2_ ^\iY1A{^0^ pts
Please award each speaker points based on the following scale:
30 = Perfect 29 = Outstanding 28 = Very Good
27 = Good (but possibly not good enough to quality for elimination roum
26-25 = Fair 24-20 = Poor <20 = Reserved for rude or ina^mpriate behavior
Judging Criteria
Analysis: How reasonably and effectively the debaters analyze^^ topic and the arguments
offered during the debate
Evidence: How appropriately and efficiently the debatem/^pport arguments with
evidence^which may include facts and references to atimority as well as general knowledge
Argumentation: How directly and effectively the d^aters respond to the arguments made
by the other side /
Points of Information: How relevant and effedtive were the questions and the answers
Delivery: How well the debaters speak in Organized,communicative style that is pleasant
and easily understandable
Courtesy: How courteous and respec^ the debaters were to opponents and judges
Using the above criteria, please offer compliments and/or suggestions for improvement to
each debater: O i

(icv>r\ U-jj 50^^

Prop 2: r^j(7<)A<W.\i^ opp2:

[o^^olW -^
r-Wil

wins this debate.

trt-A^Cuyy^n ^ r
b
Jo AmiJiACy