Methodology Summary This is my way of doing for the synthesis.

This is my idea of the work of synthe sis, complemented with ideas of prof I had in IUFM. Lecture note-taking for development • Review • Read the problem given the variou s texts of synthesis in relation to this problem: to eliminate immediately the i deas that have no link with the problem. If not already numbered lines 5 to 5. • Taking notes: I made a table (or worksheet per text) where I list ideas of each text by restating through respective line. Then stabilo with different color hi ghlights I like the ideas or report all the texts (eg text 1 and 2 may refer to the same idea but with different perspective, in this case I highlights the same color but a differently). If harvest of good ideas, not more than three colors (max 4 for me but if you get to 4 is that ideas are not well understood) problem if not properly identified. • Having successfully made the previous section is the most work because it has already reformulated so when writing will not deliv er to paraphrase the ideas of the docs will be rewritten in a more personal and faithful while not forgetting neutrality and objectivity of the two key words of a synthesis. • After just for me I made the plan as a phrase associated with 1 +2 +3 = entire sentence. • In each game, 2-3 in part, or we match our idea of te xt and table to not have to look for ideas and references to the reformulated te xt around and waste time. Attribute ideas to the document, reference to incorpor ate the phrase. • To summarize the development: • Each party must be clearly def ined and focused: an overview per game • Need guiding the reader must be able to read and understand the documents read only our synthesis. The under parts are there for. • Everything must be written • Not more than 1 or 2 citation (s) in t he copy, so the spell will see more than paraphrase and think that you do not or ganize and reformulate and take ownership of a document. • In each major party to speak all the documents. In each subpart must speak at least two documents, one must compare the documents. In summary, we must speak o f agreements and disagreements between the documents. • Skip a line between each major party and return to the line between each major subpart. • Theme Introduc tion / Overview • About the Portfolio documents Device: author / editor, the sou rce (the original doc, book section, book), types of docs (text, manual ...), da te of publication (note the differences between documents, in the news)), intend ed audience (students, teachers, parents, general public, specialist ...) • Do n ot hesitate to combine the docs. • Do not put forward ideas in the intro: seed i deas in § • Problem: question that directs the synthesis reformulates possibly d irects our investigation. • Announcement of the plan • Conclusion Resuming the i ssue / problem • Define how documents are positioned (convergence, divergence, c omplementarity • If the opening time but not mandatory, it must be relevant • Re member that the spell will wear a lot of attention intro and conclusion (beginni ng end) and you let him go to print. If your conclusion is too sloppy: tendency to be less forgiving if it was good: the baba.