0 views

Uploaded by val-ovidiu iordache

q

- R/C Soaring Digest - May 2012
- Practice Test 6
- 1408129841 Yacht Master
- airfoil
- Army Aviation Digest - Sep 1955
- Skew Angle Paper
- Pipesim Theory
- Rigging
- 25
- Design and construction of large modern yacht rigs
- Fire Structures
- 10.1016@j.jweia.2013.06.013
- Full Text 01
- r Ragoth Singh (2)
- Cabin Pressure 1x01 Abu Dhabi
- CFD Investigation of Airflow on a Model Radio
- xfoil_doc.docx
- CP Hydrodynamics
- Aerodynamic
- 20040075526.pdf

You are on page 1of 8

Dept. of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, stanbul, TURKIYE

SUMMARY

In this paper, flow characteristics around a sail and its performance are taken into account. Drag and lift coefficients for

different wind angles are obtained by using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The sail geometry is generated by

using of SAILCUT and mesh structure formed in a preprocessor GAMBIT. Numerical analyses are carried out by

using a commercial CFD package of FLUENT which uses finite volume method as discretisation scheme. The working

domain is s three-dimensional and the flow is taken as fully turbulent.

1. INTRODUCTION When the boat sails into the wind, the bow is pointed

As it is well known that, sails are instruments that use into the apparent wind, which is the vector resolution of

the wind to propel a vessel in water. A vessel can sail the true wind and the boat course. The sail in the wind

at different angles to the wind by trimming. The wind acts as an airfoil and the hull in the water acts as a

has four different effects on a sailboat. First of all, the hydrofoil, so there are two sets of forces acting on a

wind drives the boat ahead and laterally, it heels the sailboat: Aerodynamic and hydrodynamic.

boat over, and lastly, turns it around, according to the

balance of her sails, distribution of weight. The proper Helvacolu and Insel [1] obtained aerodynamic sail

handling of sails and rudder enables the sailor to utilize data from a towing tank tests and they used these

these effects of the wind that she/he may sail her/his experimental data to investigate the effect of heel angle

boat in any direction. The performance of a sailboat and leeway angle on the resistance and sideforce

depends on aerodynamics and hydrodynamics forces generated by the hull. They concluded that the effect of

affected the sailboat. Figure 1 shows the important heel is generally increasing the resistance, but no

forces for a sailboat. The upper image in Figure 1 shows conclusions on the behavior of resistance increment

the movement direction of the sailboat. In this figure the could be drawn from their experiments. As it is reported

angles between sail beam and sideforce is proportional to the leeway angle. Decrease

aerodynamics/hydrodynamics forces are clearly seen. of sideforce can be observed if separation is

Bending moment due to aerodynamics forces, encountered. Induced resistance is proportional to

deadweight and lifting forces are balanced with leeway angle, or square of the sideforce. Richards and

uprighting moment. This performance index is Mallinson [2] performed a computational study to

dependent on both the speed of the boat and the true investigate the wind flow around a mainsail and a

sailing course, which in turn are dependent on the spinnaker by using a body fitted grid that is fitted to the

aerodynamic and hydrodynamic forces produced by the sail shapes provided by a sail design programme. A

sails and the hull. In general, the windward performance simpler straight flow situation has been used to

of the boat can be improved by reducing the resistance investigate the flow interactions between the sails and it

of the hull and the drag of the sails. However changes in is found that while under some situations this

the aerodynamic and hydrodynamic forces alter the interaction is significant, under normal sailing situations

equilibrium of the sail boat which then has to adjust its the interaction is quite small. It is shown that the thrust

speed. Hence, the design of sailing yachts has to be and side force coefficients with twisted flow are similar

carried out in an environment where the analysis and to those with straight flow if referenced to the masthead

design procedures for the sails and the hull are apparent wind speed and direction. Gray [3] presented a

integrated to realize a meaningful overall design. When study to show how air flows around a sail and to explain

a hull navigates in sea there will be drag and lift. There why a dinghy is able to move towards the wind rather

are two theories to explain the phenomenon of lift over than be blown backwards. He also illustrates the effects

the top of an airfoil. These are Bernoulli and Euler of altering the angle of the sail, using different sail

theories. shapes and using a rig consisting of two sails.

Session A 151

Figure 1 Forces on a sailing yacht [4].

Session A 152

From his experiments it can be seen that a boat is able given in Table 1 and the remaining surface of the sails

to sail into the wind with an aerofoil shaped sail set at between the sections are interpolated from the

250 to 300 to the wind direction because of the forces information on each sections.

created by the different pressures on either side of the

sail. Too large a curve at the front of the sail reduces the

Table 1 Main dimensions of the sail

efficiency of the rig because the angle between the wind

and the direction of travel is increased. Smaller sail Luff Length (m) 8

increases the area of the rig and so increases the Luff Round (m) 0.1

pressure difference, giving greater boat speed. Richards Luff Round Position (%) 50

et al. [5] investigated drag and lift forces to maximize Foot Length (m) 3.935

the trust by trimming the spinner especially for typical Foot Round (m) 0.17

Americas Cup class yachts. They stated that the normal Gaff Length (m) 0.2

downwind apparent wind angles are between 900 and Gaff Round (m) 0

1350 in winds over 5 m/s. Under such conditions the Gaff Angle (deg) 60

thrust is maximized by trimming the spinnaker to give Leech Length (m) 8.416

its maximum lift and the mainsail to provide Leech Roach) (m 0.2

approximately equal amounts of lift and drag. It is Leech Roach Position (%) 60

therefore concluded that Americas Cup downwind sails Sail Area (m2) 18.63

need to act both as vertical wings and horizontal

parachutes. Viscous flows around sail-like rigid wings Fig. 2 shows the attack angle between the sail and the

are calculated by using a CFD tool and analyzed wind velocity. In this study these angles are varied from

experimentally by Yoo and Kim [6]. Lift, drag and 50 to 900 by 50 increments for three different wind

thrust forces are estimated for various conditions of gap velocity, 5 knot, 7.5 knot and 10 knot.

distance between the two sails and the center of effort of

the sail system are obtained. Wind tunnel experiments

are also carried out to measure aerodynamic forces

acting on the sail system and to validate the

computation. It is found that the combination of two

sails produces the lift force larger than the sum of that

produced separately by each sail and the gap distance

between the two sails is an important factor to

determine total lift and thrust. They concluded that it is

quite certain that CFD can be a very powerful and

useful tool for the aero- and hydrodynamic performance Figure 2 Angle between the sail and the wind direction.

prediction of sailing yacht in basic design stage. Clauss

and Heissen [7] analyzed the flying shape of a mainsail Discretization of the flow equations requires the

and a jib by using CFD and they concluded that at subdivision of the computational domain into a grid of

greater apparent wind angles the flow was not sufficiently small cells as shown in Fig.4a. This figure

stationary. shows the structured grid for the sail and whole working

domain. Although unstructured grid provides more

This study deals with occurred aerodynamics forces due flexibility in geometry and grid generation, this type of

to different wind angles and velocities. During the grid requires more cells and so it is more costly [7]. The

computational analysis the sail is considered as a rigid sail under investigation is located in a rectangular

body. The analyses are performed for three different domain as shown in Fig. 4a. In this figure the generated

wind velocity; 5, 7.5 and 10 knot, respectively. For each grid system for rectangular domain covered the sail as

velocity value, the effect of wind angles are investigated shown in Figure 4b. All the grid system for CFD

from 00 to 900 by 7.50 increments. A complimentary calculation is generated by using GAMBIT pre-

series of computational studies has been conducted to processor of FLUENT. Totally 998000 hexahedral

help understand the effect of angle between the sail and mesh elements are used for rectangular domain. The

the wind direction and velocity values. flow is considered as 3-dimensional and fully turbulent.

The sail itself is specified as wall type and surfaces of

2. MATHEMATICAL MODEL the whole domain considered as wall, too. Uniform

In this simulation, the sail under consideration is velocity, turbulent kinetic energy and its dissipation rate

generated by SAILCUT package. As a general are given at the inlet of the domain, while pressure

knowledge, parts of a sail are given in Fig. 3 and the outlet is specified at the outlet. The solver considered

main dimensions are summarized in Table 1. The here uses finite volume method as discretization

geometry of the sail can be defined by other parameters scheme. The flow is steady, incompressible, and three-

to produce realistic and actual operating conditions. For dimensional. As turbulence closure Standard k- (SKE)

the each section of sails, typical parameters such as turbulence model with standard wall-function is used.

chord length, camber and mast angles are selected as The k- turbulence model is one of several two-

Session A 153

equation models that have developed over the years. It and the freestream is called as attack angle as shown in

is probably the most widely and thoroughly tested of Figure 3. Lift (L) and drag (D) depend on this angle and

them all. As it is well known that SKE is a semi- velocity. The drag and lift coefficients are calculated as

empirical model based on model transport equations for follows (Eq. 4 and Eq. 5).

the turbulence kinetic energy,k (Eq.1) and its

dissipation , (Eq. 2 L (4)

CL =

1

V 2 A

k ( ui k ) t k 2

+ = + + (1)

t xi xi Prk xi D (5)

CD =

T G + Sk , p 1

V 2 A

2

( ui ) T

+ = + + (2) Obtained Drag and lift forces are showed in Fig. 7. The

t xi xi Pr xi optimum working value of a carrier object can be

determined by analyze CL/CD ratio. The pressure

( C1T G C2 ) + S , p

k resistance is defined as the difference between the

maximum pressure field and the minimum pressure

where C1 and C2 are additional dimensionless model field at the detachment region. This pressure resistance

constants; Prk and Pre are the turbulent Prandtl numbers is then added to the viscous resistance and has the

for kinetic energy and dissipation, respectively; Sk,p and higher value than the viscous resistance in general. So a

Se,p are source terms for the kinetic energy and turbulent resistance of an object can be defined as in Eq. 6:

dissipation; and the turbulent production rate (G) is

defined in Eq. 3: C D = C D , pressure + C D ,viscous (6)

(a) (b)

u u j ui 1

G = i +

x j xi x j 2 x j xJ

3. RESULTS AND MAIN FINDINGS

(3) The main purpose of this study is to show the optimum

2 k ui u J wind direction angle and the wind velocity value for a

+ sailboat. To achieve these goals some computational

3 T xJ x j

analysis are performed on a personal computer of 1.6

GHz core with 2.256 GB RAM. After nine work days

The carrier objects are designed to satisfy minimum running some results are obtained as shown in Fig.6 and

drag and maximum forces. The angle between the chord Fig. 7.

Session A 154

(a) (b)

a) whole domain b) sail.

Figure 5 shows the pressure contours variations and Streamlines and pressure contours variation around the

embedded velocity vectors for three different wind sail for w=900 is showed in Figure 6f from a different

velocity values, Vw=5 knot,7.5 knot and 10 at the sail point of view. At this situation the sail faced with the

for w=450. As can be seen from these figures, when the wind perpendicularly and acts as an obstacle. The

wind velocity increases from 5 knot to 7.5 knot, positive coming flow (air) is separated around the sail and lead

and negative pressure values on the sail surfaces to a circulation region. The pressure behind the sail gets

increase as well. Fig. 6 shows the pressure contours the highest value. The effects of the wind velocity and

variations and streamlines around the sail at the height wind angle values on the drag and lift forces can be

of y=4m. These figures are presented for wind velocity seen in Figure 7. In these figures it is observed that both

value of 5 knot and w=150-900. As can be clearly seen the drag and lift forces rises to approximately w=530

that when the angle between the sail and the wind is and after that point both drag and lift forces reduces.

getting higher the corruption in the streamlines are The increments and decays in drag and lift forces occur

getting more. At the same time the pressure behind the for all velocity values. While wind velocity value

sail is decreased even more, increasing the lift. This changed from 5 knots to 7.5 knots and then to 10 knots,

means a boat can sail faster. When angles increases a drag and lift forces increase, as well. Figure 7 shows

vortex develops behind the leading edge and the boat CL/CD ratio for three different wind velocity and angles

has to be steered away from the wind to maintain a form 00 to 900. In this figure it can be observed that at

smooth airflow. At the small angles there is no any higher wind velocity the sail has the highest CL/CD ratio

recirculation observed while at the higher angles till to w=530. After that angle high velocity gives the

especially at w=900, there is a big recirculation region best ratio for the sail performance.

behind the sail.

Session A 155

(a) (b)

(c)

Figure 5 Pressure contours variations for three different wind velocity values (=450),

a) Vw=5 knot, b) Vw=7.5 knot, c) Vw=10 knot.

Session A 156

1,6

1,4

1,2

Cl

0,8

(a)

0,6

0,4 5 knot

7.5 knot

0,2

10 knot

0

0 20 40 60 80 100

Angle

(b) (a)

1

0,9

0,8

0,7

0,6

Cd 0,5

(c) 0,4

0,3

5 knot

0,2

7.5 knot

0,1 10 knot

0

0 20 40 60 80 100

Angle

(d)

(b)

1,65

1,6

1,55

1,5

Cl/Cd

(e) 1,45

1,4

1,35 5 knot

7.5 knot

1,3

10 knot

1,25

0 20 40 60 80 100

Angle

(c)

a) lifting forces, b) drag forces, c) lift/drag forces.

4. CONCLUSION

(f)

In the present CFD analysis, the effect of wind velocity

value and angle between the sail and the wind is

Figure 6 Pressure contous variations and streamlines

investigated and results are showed in pressure

around the sail for different wind angles; a) w=150, b)

contours, streamlines and drag and lift forces. From the

w=300, c) w=450, d) w=600, e) w=750, f) w=900 for results it is observed that at high velocity and large wind

Vw=5 knot. angle values negative pressure occurs behind the sail at

increases the sail performance. This conclusion is not

Session A 157

valid after the wind angle of about 530. After that point 4. Ylmaz, T., Yat Tasarm, Birsen Yaynevi, 2006.

drag/lift ratio decreases.

5. Richards, P. J., Johnson, A., Stanton, A.,

5. REFERENCES Americas Cup downwind sails-vertical wings or

1. Helvacioglu, S., Insel, M., Sailing Yacht horizontal parachutes? Journal of Wind

Performance: The Effects of Heel Angle and Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 89,

Leeway Angle of Resistance and Sideforce, 1. 1565-1577, 2001.

International Yachting Conference, October,

1995.Cesme, TURKIYE. 6. Yoo, J., Kim, H.T., Computational and

Experimental Study on the Performance of Sails of

2. Richard, P.J., Mallinson, G.D., The Use of a Yacht Ocean Engineering 33, 1322-1342, 2006.

Computational Modeling in a Study of Downwind

Sail, the PHONEIX Journal 13 (3), 225-242, 2000 7. Clauss, G., Heisen, W., CFD Analysis on the

and 8th Int. PHONEIX Users Conference, Flying Shape of Modern Yacht Sails, 12th Int.

Luxemburg, 16-20 May, 2000. Congress of the Int. Maritime Assoc. of the

Mediterranean, 26-30 September, 2005, Lisbon,

3. Gray, R. P., Investigation of the airflow around a Portugal

sail", Pyh. Educ. 21, 1986.

Session A 158

- R/C Soaring Digest - May 2012Uploaded byAviation/Space History Library
- Practice Test 6Uploaded byCrystal Phoenix
- 1408129841 Yacht MasterUploaded byИрина Ђорђевић
- airfoilUploaded byAjith Jose
- Army Aviation Digest - Sep 1955Uploaded byAviation/Space History Library
- Skew Angle PaperUploaded bym_b_s
- Pipesim TheoryUploaded byMiguel Angel Lopez
- RiggingUploaded byVORADFILS
- 25Uploaded byPeter Sawiris
- Design and construction of large modern yacht rigsUploaded byBetaLaval
- Fire StructuresUploaded byaskro
- 10.1016@j.jweia.2013.06.013Uploaded byFabio Ferraz de Carvalho
- Full Text 01Uploaded byசோ. இளமுகில்
- r Ragoth Singh (2)Uploaded byvishallchhaya
- Cabin Pressure 1x01 Abu DhabiUploaded byValesca Giuriati
- CFD Investigation of Airflow on a Model RadioUploaded bybayu_sukmaperdana
- xfoil_doc.docxUploaded bynanayipn
- CP HydrodynamicsUploaded byhaphong3000
- AerodynamicUploaded byKing Everest
- 20040075526.pdfUploaded byÍtalo Neves
- Turbulence -1.docxUploaded byknowme73
- aa2Uploaded byAshutosh Kumar
- COMPUTATIONAL SIMULATION OF DYNAMIC STALL ON THE NLR 7301 AIRFOILUploaded byBenson Liu
- Pereira_2014_J._Phys.%3A_Conf._Ser._555_012082Uploaded byomar
- j of Vip Flapping Wing 2013Uploaded byHua Hidari Yang
- The Leading Edge - Goro - 1st Edition CorrectionsUploaded bycarl pitonzio
- jpconf7_75_012033windturbineUploaded bySattar Al-Jabair
- DD1_consumer.ashx Copy Fall WinterUploaded byJames Carrington
- finalreportUploaded byLoki Maha
- 1520-0450%281997%29036%3C1016%3Atllotd%3E2.0.co%3B2.pdfUploaded byArcangelo Di Tano

- Ship Design Estimation MethodsUploaded byMH Bappy
- mmhg to hpaUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- de dwn de pe youtube.txtUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- New Text DocumentUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- lec10Uploaded byMuhammad Adam
- join.lsp.txtUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- join.lsp.txtUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- CIP_pdf817Uploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- F2006B00682ESUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- An Assessment i So 12215 Craft HullUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- MotivationUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- DNVGL-RU-0050_2014-10Uploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- Bb h PresentationUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- Brochure Wolf IngUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- Aluminium - Hull Structure in Naval ApplicationsUploaded byStefano Costa
- hs506_2012-07 (1).pdfUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- Fn97616 Ecorys Final Report on Shipbuilding Competitiveness EnUploaded byTadas Pipiras
- Http 139.165.65.75 Projets Biblio Upload Compit06 335Capraceetal AnAnalyticalCostAssessmentModulefortheDetailedDesignStageUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- Hydrostatics & Stability Report Richard.pdfUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- Planning Employability AmbassadorsUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- MV Charlie 1_Final Safety Investigation ReportUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- stabilitybooklet_dortheUploaded byAljf Guimaraes
- insights.pdfUploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- Free Surface EffectUploaded byFarid Muhamad
- hs501Uploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- hs005_2011-07Uploaded byval-ovidiu iordache
- hs504_2012-07Uploaded byval-ovidiu iordache

- Bio MedicalUploaded byHusseinKhalid
- Ch 5-2 Free-body DiagramsUploaded bysunlias
- r05211002 Electrical TechnologyUploaded bySRINIVASA RAO GANTA
- Introduction to ANSYS Mechanical (2D)Uploaded byMi Bo
- Fluke Vibration TestingUploaded byMarco Antonio Lima
- 4TNE98-G1A (0CR10-G45800)Uploaded byngafri
- Phy Tron MotorUploaded byAdi Abimanyu
- Handling of goods in mall.pdfUploaded byAli Warsi
- Steering controlled adaptive headlights with designUploaded byKanhaiyaPrasad
- Contactors CB-line Leaflet English Ed04!10!680876 (1)Uploaded byOsun Deji Lana
- Power Cable Schedule.xlsUploaded byshanmars
- Solution of Assignment 7Uploaded byRealyandieto Monantun
- 1104d-e44ta_sbl@96.5kw_(tpd1575e1)Uploaded bypricopdaniel
- Introduction to Offshore Structural EngineeringUploaded byAbraham Imam Muttaqin
- Start Two Stage Ammonia Plant Et 2015-02-23Uploaded bydachoko87
- T233HST T273HST Parts CatalogUploaded byjaln29
- Curso Basico de Variadores de FrecuenciaUploaded byIL Lo Gar
- 3. Pressure Loss in the WellboreUploaded byThev Ruban
- FMUploaded bySyed Sirajul Haq
- Prema Service Company FlyerUploaded bytaraneon
- ColumnUploaded byram
- VSP PARA BUQUES DE OFFSHORE.pdfUploaded byrrcardoso230
- 16536E-0299[1]Uploaded bysinalefe89
- Uebersicht Broschuere Produkte Massivumformung eUploaded byZaiimatul Husnaa Muharramiyyah
- flujometro magneticoUploaded byManuel Veliz
- starbus-ultra.pdfUploaded byHarshal Dhanawade
- Advanced Engineering Properties of SteelsUploaded byMihajloDjurdjevic
- Circular Motion - Wikipedia, The Free EncyclopediaUploaded byAkshat Tyagi
- Composite WallUploaded byDhananjay Kadam
- MANUAL SKUploaded byLuis Daniel Rodriguez Abanto