You are on page 1of 70

In-Service Testing and Diagnosis of

Gapless Metal Oxide Surge Arresters


According to IEC60099-5
Overview of presentation

Motivation for condition monitoring of metal


oxide surge arresters (MOSA)
The Surge arrester life
Service experience
Examples of arrester failures
Characteristic properties of MOSA (ZnO)-
arrester
Aging and causes of failure
Consequences of failure transformer
failures
Title 2 2
Overview of presentation contd.

Surge arrester condition assessment


IEC 60099-5 about Diagnostic indicators of
metal oxide surge arresters in service
Monitoring equipment and field application for
third harmonic analysis with compensation
Testing strategy and risk assessment
Case studies

Title 3 3
Background and Motivation

The Metal Oxide Surge Arrester (MOSA) is a


cheap and passive component, but protecting
crucial apparatus.
Overlooked despite severe consequences if it
fails.
MOSAs can age and fail due for a number of
different reasons.
May offer inadequate overvoltage protection,
especially if the rated voltage is selected too low.
Diagnostic indicator: Resistive leakage current
increases with time increasing risk for failure.
Title 4 4
Power System Overview
Typical Location of Surge Arresters

Typical location of
surge arresters:

In substations
At the end of
transmission lines
At cable ends
At transformers,
generators, capacitors
etc

Location depending on
voltage level,
equipment and local
conditions

Title 5 5
The Surge Arrester Life
The normal destiny of the surge arrester is to be:
specified, purchased, installed
- and forgotten
Most common maintenance practice:
No testing of surge arresters
Only replacement after breakdown.
surge arresters are inexpensive
no big deal to replace!!!

Is this really an acceptable practice?

Title 6 6
The Surge Arrester Life

Why care about surge arresters?


1. The arrester is your bodyguard for
protecting important apparatus against
the overvoltage terrorists
2. You cannot see if an arrester is bad,
but you can measure it.
The big question is:
Are the arresters fit for fight?

Title 7 7
Surge Arrester
Service Experiences

Failure rate depending on arrester quality,


dimensioning and local conditions
Typical failure effects on arresters:
Explosion and external damages
visual detection
Puncturing and causing earth fault -
indicated by earth fault relay, can be
difficulty to locate
Aged arrester with reduced protection
level cannot be found without
checking the arrester
Title 8 8
Failure of 400kV Surge Arrester

Title 9 9
Failed Arrester
hanging with Bus Pipe

Title 10 10
Shattered Pieces of
Surge Arrester Stacks

Title 11 11
Damaged Surge Monitor and shattered Pieces of
Arrester stack

Title 12 12
Another failed Surge Arrester

Title 13 13
MoreFailure of Surge Arrester

Title 14 14
Surge Arrester Properties

Main objectives:
Protect important apparatus against
dangerous overvoltages
Low resistance during surges so that
overvoltages are limited
High resistance during normal operation, to
avoid negative effects on the power system
Sufficient energy absorption capability for
stable operation

Title 15 15
Equivalent Circuit Diagrams

SiC Arrester MO Arrester

Series
spark gap
and RC
control MO
discharge
resistor

SiC discharge
resistor

Title 16 16
Voltage Current Characteristics
MOSA (ZnO) and SiC Arresters

Title 17 17
Thermal Instability

Thermal instability and arrester failure can occur at


operating voltage in case the temperature of the blocks
is too high.

MOSA must be correctly selected with respect to:


o continuous operating voltage
o different kinds of overvoltages
o ambient temperature
o pollution
o ageing

Title 18 18
Total Power Dissipation Accumulated of
Sequence of Incidents in the Network

1. A lightning strike causes a discharge in a


MOSA
2. The lightning causes an earth fault in the
network
3. Single line to earth fault causes voltage
increases on the two healthy phases
4. The earth is disconnected by a circuit
breaker
5. Disconnection of the fault can cause
increased TOV due to load dropping
6. Circuit breaker reclosing cause additional
arrester energy due to switching
overvoltages
Title 19 19
Critical factors to avoid failure

Rated voltage must be chosen high enough based on:

- Normal operation conditions


- Ambient temperature
- Continuous voltage
- Surface contamination
- Ageing
- Accumulated energy from previous discharges

Title 20 20
The choice of MOSA is always a compromise

Increased nominal/rated voltage:


Possibility that the MOSA will withstand the
stress increases
Reduced protection margin

Arresters with higher energy class:


reduced risk for arrester failure
Price increases


The choice of MOSA is a compromise between protection
level, voltage withstand and energy absorption

Title 21 21
Design of Porchelain-MOSA
eks. Cooper Power Systems

Title 22 22
Design of Polymeric-MOSA (ABB)

Title 23 23
Ageing of MOSA
Normal operating voltage causes ageing
Pollution and overvoltage surges can cause ageing
from overloading of all or some of the blocks
Moisture entry through sealing gaskets, may lead to
shorting of ZnO discs and overstressing of healthy
ZnO blocks.
Degree of ageing depends on the nature/ quality of
the granular layer.
Increase in resistive leakage current may bring the
arrester to thermal instability and complete
arrester breakdown.
Title 24 24
Metal Oxide Surge Arresters
- Causes for Failure
Incorrect arrester specification corresponding to
actual system voltage and overvoltage stress
Overloading due to:
Temporary overvoltages (cracking, puncturing).
Switching overvoltages (cracking, puncturing,
flashover).
Lightning overvoltages (change of
characteristic/ageing, flashover, puncturing).
External pollution or moisture penetration .
Consequence of aging: Increase in the continuous resistive
leakage current .

This is a good indicator of the arrester condition.

Title 25 25
Consequences of Arrester Failures

Reduced overvoltage protection


- Increased risk of equipment failure and
outages for instance breakdown in
transformer, bushings, switchgear

Possible break-down of porcelain housings:


- Risk of personal injury
- Risk of damage to other equipment

Title 26 26
Reasons for Transformer Failures

The US insurance company HSB


reports, as reasons for transformer
failures:
Electrical disturbances: 29%
Lightning: 16%

Has the arrester done its job?

Title 27 27
YES -Transformers Do Fail

Title 28 28
YES -Transformers Do Fail

Title 29 29
Possibilities for Surge Arrester
Condition Assessment

SiC - Arresters with spark gaps:


No reliable in-service method available off-line tests:
Spark-over test and grading current measurement
Dielectric loss (the Doble test)

Metal oxide surge arresters without gaps:


In service tests are possible
On line tests:
Continuous leakage current during normal service.
Available in-service methods discussed in Amendment
1 to IEC 60099-5: Diagnostic indicators for metal
oxide surge arresters in service.

Title 30 30
Why Condition Assessment of
Surge Arresters?

Condition check performed on regular basis will:

Increase the safety for the operational and maintenance


staff.

Give early warning signals utilize life time and take


aged arresters out of service before they fail.

Prevent costly arrester failures and service interruptions.

Prevent damages to other equipment,


e.g. transformer bushings.

Title 31 31
IEC 60099-5 Part 5:
Selection and Application Recommendation

Title 32 32
Methods for Monitoring of degradation of MOSA
Visual inspection
Locating external abnormalities on the arrester and gives
practically no information about the internal of the arrester
Surge counters
Frequently installed on MOSA, but has no practical use for
diagnosis of condition of the arresters
Temperature measurements Thermo Vision
Frequently used method. Detects the increased block
temperature on the housing surface of the arrester.
Leakage current measurements
Most used diagnostic method. For in-service testing, the
method with indirect determination of the resistive leakage
current with compensation for harmonics in the voltage
(THRC) is providing the best available information quality
with respect to diagnostic efficiency.
Title 33 33
Conventional Surge Counters

Title 34 34
Modern Surge Counter
ABB EXCOUNT II

Mod. Mod.
1 2
SURGE COUNTING:
- Number
- Time stamp
- Current amplitude classif.
CONDITION MONITORING:
- Total leakage current
- Resistive leakage current
(Method B2 - IEC 60099-5)

Title 35 35
Monitoring Spark Gaps, from TriDelta

Title 36 36
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurements

It

Ic: Ir:
0.2-3 mA 10-600A
U

Title 37 37
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurements

Measurement of the total leakage current


example:

It

Ic: Ir:
0.2-3 10-600A
mA U
Ic = 100 Ic = 100

It = 100,5 It = 104,5

Ir = 10 Ir = 30

Title 38 38
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurements

Measurement of the total leakage current


example:

The total leakage current


increases with only 4%
when the resistive part is
triple.
Ic = 100 Ic = 100

It = 100,5 It = 104,5 This small change in It is


difficult to read on the
mA meter.
Ir = 10 Ir = 30

Title 39 39
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurement

IEC 60099-5, clause 6.1.6.1.2:


At given values of voltage and temperature, the
resistive component of the leakage current is a
sensitive indicator of changes in the voltage-
current characteristic of non-linear metal-oxide
resistors.
The resistive current can, therefore, be used as
a tool for diagnostic indication of changes in the
condition of metal-oxide arresters in service.
Title 40 40
Equivalent Circuit of MOSA

Ic in the same size as It.

Ir is nonlinear and depends on


It voltage level and
temperature.
Ic: Ir: U sinusoidal (fundamental
0.2-3 10-600A
mA U component only): I1c, I1r, I3r
Harmonics in the operating
voltage U: I1c, I1r, I3r, I3c
I3r (and Ir) is generated by the
arrester itself and can be
used as a diagnostic
indicator.

Title 41 41
Typical Voltage - Current
Characteristics

The resistive current


component:
is typically 5-20% of the
total leakage current under
normal operating conditions.
is a sensitive indicator of
changes in the voltage-
current characteristic.
depends on the voltage and
temperature.

Title 42 42
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurements
Method B1: 3rd harmonic analysis of leakage current:
IEC 60099-5 says: Error range for third harmonic leakage
current without compensation for different phase angles of
system voltage third harmonics:
Includes various
voltage-current
characteristics of no
linear metal-oxide
120
resistors.
1% third harmonic in
voltage may give
100% measurement
error.
270
(Norway: 0,1 0,9%
harm.)

Title 43 43
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurements
Method B2: Harmonic analysis of leakage current
using third harmonic with compensation:
3rd harmonic analysis chosen is used as a basis to obtain
feasibility/reliability measurements in three-phase applications on-
site.
Presences of harmonics in the operating voltage generate harmonic
capacitive leakage currents that is indirectly measured and
compensated for.
The key for compensation is application of field probe for indirect
measurement of the 3rd harmonic capacitive leakage current
generated by the operating voltage.
The total and true resistive leakage current Ir is calculated from I3r
and arrester data (incl. correction for temperature and voltage).

Title 44 44
IEC 60099-5:
Leakage Current Measurements

Weakness with Method B1: The presence of harmonics


in the system voltage have been a great problem since
these harmonics may interfere with the harmonics
generated by the nonlinear resistance of the arrester.

Favorable effect by Method B2: It introduces a field


probe that allows a compensation for the harmonic
currents generated by the harmonics in the voltage. This
implies that the method shows low sensitivity to
harmonics in the voltage.

Method B2: Measurement of resistive leakage current


using 3rd harmonic analysis with compensation for
harmonics in the system voltage.
Title 45 45
IEC 60099-5: Summary
Properties of on-site leakage current measurements:

A HV-DC test is
effective but off
line and complex

Method B2 is
ranked to be the
best field method
for evaluation of
ageing and
deterioration of
MOSA.

Title 46 46
IEC 60099-5:
Summary of Performance
Available diagnostic methods:
Measurement of total leakage current.
Poor sensitivity. Insufficient method.
Direct measurement of resistive leakage current.
Attractive, but not usable on site.
Method B1: 3rd harmonic analysis of the leakage
current.
High sensitivity to harmonics in the voltage.

Method B2: 3rd order harmonic analysis of the leakage


current with compensation.
Ranked by IEC 60099-5 as most reliable on site.

Title 47 47
Deployment of LCM 500 accessories

1
1. Gapless MOSA
2. Insulated base
3. Grounding wire
The Field Probe should
NEVER exceed this limit 4. Clip-on CT500 it(t)
2
5. Counter
3 6. Field probe ip(t)
4 7. Arrester pedestal
5 8 9
7
6 8. Telescopic rod
9. LCM 500 unit

Title www.doble.no 48 48
Performance of testing
TOGETHER WE POWER THE WORLD

First of all connect


the instrument to
earth

CCT should be
placed above any
counter/a-meters

FP should be placed
as close as possible
to the base of the
arresters
Title 49

www.doble.com
Leakage Current Measurements
Requirements: Separate earth lead & insulated base for each arrester.

Short circuit of
insulated base
Electromagnetic will lead to
field can circulating
introduce current currents in the
in this loop. fundament and
the earth lead.
CCT
CCT

CCT = Clip-on Current Transformer

Title 50 50
Risk Assessment
Based on the level and development of resistive leakage
current Ir over time:
1. Trend analysis over time
In general look for increasing trend
Baseline reading when the arrester is new. If Ir
increases by 300-400%, this confirms severe ageing
2. Compare to maximum recommended values from
arrester manufacturers
3. Compare Ir for arresters of the same make and type:
The three phases in a line or bay
All arresters in the grid
4. Combination of step 1-3

Title 51 51
Risk Assessment
Steps in the final evaluation:
1. It and Ir are unrealistically high: Circulating
currents? Check the insulated base and arrester
grounding.
2. Ir higher than expected: Temporary heating?
Consider to re-test in approx. 1 day to confirm
measured value.
3. Confirmed high reading of Ir: Monitor
continuously or proceed with step 4.
4. Contact arrester manufacturer and consider
replacement.

Title 52 52
Testing Strategy
1. Classify all your MOSAs (name of substation, bay/line and
phase, nameplate data (manufacturer, type designation,
year/date of commissioning etc.), historical data/failure
rates, importance etc.).
2. Establish threshold levels/maximum recommended levels
for the resistive leakage current for each arrester type.
3. Define action limits (good condition, satisfactory, re-
test/monitor continuously, replace).
4. Define measurement regularity (normal, frequent,
monitor continuously, after special fault situations).
5. Define verification actions after replacement (laboratory
test, dissection/inspection).
6. Evaluate measurements, action limits, regularity of
measurements and verification tests to possibly improve the
testing strategy.

Title 53 53
Case studies

1. Measurements at a 420kV GIS


2. Measurements at a Petro-Chemical factory
3. Measurements at an Oil Refinery
4. Power Utility
5. 110kV Transmission line
6. City substation
7. 420kV Substation
8. Coastal site
9. 110kV substation

Title 54 54
Measurements at 420 kV GIS Substation (1/3)

Case 1: 24 arresters, type A, B and C - 420 kV

The utility wanted to assess the arrester conditions


because of surge arrester failures in the past.

Max. recommended leakage current values:


Type A = 167A (167 A = 100%)
Type B = 100A (100 A = 100%)
Type C = 675 A (675 A = 100%)

Title 55 55
Measurements at 420 kV GIS Substation (2/3)
420 kV MOSA at transmission utility
Type A: 100% ~ 165 A Type B: 100% ~ 165 uA
120
Resistive leakage current in percent

120

percent of max. recommended


of max. recommended (100%)

Resistive leakage current in


100 100

80 Bay 1 80
Bay 2 Bay 7
60 60
Bay 3 Bay 8
40 Bay 4 40

20 20

0 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6
Arrester number
Type
3000
C: 100% ~ 675 uA Arrester number
Resistive leakage current (uA)

2500

2000
Bay 5
1500
Bay 6
1000

500

0
1 2 3 4 5 6
Arrester number

Title 56 56
Measurements at 420 kV GIS Substation (3/3)

Measurements showed:
1 arrester of type C with app. 375% of max. recommended value
1 arrester of type A with app. 90% of max. Recommended value

The rest of the arresters had values from 70% and lower.

Conclusion: The two arresters showing the highest values


were replaced to reduce the risk of outages.
New measurement is recommended in one
year.

Title 57 57
Measurement at a Petro-Chemical factory (1/1)

Case 2: 6 arresters, 145kV, installed 1984


Factory owner anxious due to:
very high production loss if outages
old arresters, condition unknown
Measurements showed:
2 units with app. 130%(Ir max rec.= 130A=100%)
3 units with app. 95%
1 unit with app. 70%

Conclusion: All 6 arresters were replaced to reduce


outage risk

Title 58 58
Measurement at a Oil Refinery (1/1)

Case 3: 6 arresters, 300kV, installed 1984


Refinery owner anxious due to:
old arresters, condition unknown
very high production loss if outages
Measurements gave:
2 units with app. 60% (Ir max rec.= 130A=100%)
2 units with app. 50%
2 units with app. 35%
Conclusion: All arresters OK
New measurements recommended in one year

Title 59 59
Utility performing routine tests annually (1/2)
Case 4: Annually routine testing with LCM for all
arresters in the grid
Condition monitoring to avoid:
Sudden failures
blasting of arresters
outages
Philosophy:
Use a simple test to detect bad arresters in service- no outage
necessary!
Have set max resistive leakage current to 500A
Verification of LCM measurements in laboratory (capacitance, tan,
IR and dissection)
Cooperate with arrester manufacturer to improve arrester design
based on measurement experience

Title 60 60
Utility performing routine tests annually (2/2)

70 surge arresters have been removed from service, based


on resistive leakage current measurements with LCM
Conclusion:
Utility statement: Using LCM with third harmonic resistive
current measurement technique is very effective in detecting
defective/ aged surge arresters
Removed arresters showed:
90% damaged due to moisture ingress
10 % severely aged
The problem increased during the rainy season
The sealing gaskets were improved and replaced by o-
rings in cooperation with the arrester manufacturer

Title 61 61
Measurements at 110 kV Transm.line (1/2)

Case 5: Leakage current measurements as part of the


condition based maintenance for 110 kV system
Utility is using LCM II for the following purposes:
Identify and remove bad arresters
Replacing standard leakage current meters which are both ineffective
and easily damaged by extreme weather and pollution
Measuring philosophy:
As a preventive approach, arresters are measured before monsoon with
the LCM II
Removed arresters are tested in laboratory for verification of high
leakage currents (IR testing, waveform analysis etc.)

Title 62 62
Measurements at 110 kV Transm.line (2/2)

Conclusions:
3 arresters have been removed based on leakage current
measurements so far
All three showed high leakage currents of respectively 293A, 570A
and 7070 A!!!
Remaining arresters of same make showed low and normal values
(<80A)
Standard analog meters in the field were not showing readings in the
alarm region

Title 63 63
Measurements at a City Substation (1/1)
Case 6: 18 arresters, 300 kV, majority installed in 1980
The utility was concerned due to arrester failures
(arrester explosions) in the past
Measurements showed:
3 units with close to 300% (Ir max rec.=130A=100%)
4 units in the area app. 70-100%
The rest showed low/normal values <50%
Conclusion/our recommendations:
Replace 3 arresters
Monitor 4 arresters closely
Measure the rest again in app. 1-2 years

Title 64 64
Measurements at 420 kV System (1/1)

Case 7: 6 arresters, 420 kV, commissioned in 1988

Max recommended resistive leakage current for all 6


arresters are Ir = 165A (= 100%)

Measurements showed:
All arresters had Ir values between 37-55%

Conclusion: All arresters are considered to be in good


condition. New measurements are
recommended in one year

Title 65 65
Measurements at Coastal Site (1/1)

Case 8: 6 arresters, 145 kV, commissioned in 2002

Max recommended leakage current for all 6 arresters are


Ir = 130A (= 100%)

Measurements gave:
All arresters had Ir values between 35-46%

Conclusion: All arresters are considered to be in good


condition. New measurements are
recommended in two years

Title 66 66
Measurements at 110 kV Substation (1/2)

Case 9: 18 arresters, 110 kV measured in 2007

Max recommended leakage current not known baseline


established by averaging measurements for all 18arresters

Measurements gave:
Two arresters had significantly higher readings (230% and 400%
respectively

Conclusion: The two arresters were taken out of service


for laboratory testing. The test showed ingress of moisture
that caused internal heating and increase of resistive
leakage currents

Title 67 67
Measurements at 110 kV Substation (2/2)

Test of 110kV MOSAs, early 2007

Title 68 68
Summary
Surge arresters protect valuable assets from overvoltages
generated by lightning strikes or switching operations.

MOSA will deteriorate over time due to electrical and thermal


stress.

Leakage Current Measurement


Method B2 using third harmonic with compensation
according to IEC 60099-5 has been used successfully world
wide for surge arrester monitoring.

This method is easy and efficient for field application for any
make of metal oxide surge arresters.

Title 69 69
QUESTIONS?

Title 70 70