You are on page 1of 2

Tax rates

FIRST PERSON By Alex Magno (The Philippine Star) | Updated September 5, 2015 - 12:00am

Although Rep. Miro Quimbo remains hopeful his bill bringing down rates for individual income taxes might
still be passed, his counterpart at the upper chamber Sen. Ralph Recto readily concedes there is no time
left to pass the measure. The two legislators have been working to reduce our unrealistic tax rates
imposed on fixed wage earners.

The Philippines has the highest tax rates in the region. The rates have remained fixed for over two
decades now.

Earlier, when government was trying to pass VAT, our people were promised reductions in income tax
rates as revenues are being collected from expenditure. VAT signaled a shift in the burden of taxes from
the revenue side to the consumption side. This should reflect more advanced theories about fiscal
management.

The old orthodoxy about imposing progressive tax rates on income is not only tedious to administer. It
simply does not work. The fixed income earners end up paying more taxes than the richest
entrepreneurs.

When the tax brackets are allowed to be overrun by inflation, the injustice just grows. As wages rise, more
and more wage earners are obliged to pay the maximum tax rates. Today, with our unadjusted tax
brackets, nearly every white collar worker pays the maximum rates.

For two decades, our government reneged on the promise of reducing income tax rates in exchange for
introducing VAT. The state, always greedy for revenues, ends up wiping out the middle classes. As the
high tax rates cut deeply into real disposable income, income inequality deepens.

Shifting taxes to the consumption side is the saner course. It does not inhibit the drive to raise income
while encouraging savings and investments through prudence in spending. Incomes should not be
penalized. Ostentatious consumption should be.

As the global economy slows down, in the face of Chinas dwindling growth, it becomes imperative for
governments to adopt counter-cyclical measures to boost domestic consumption. The best way to
achieve that, at this time, is to immediately reduce tax rates.

We can no longer rely on our chronically underspending government to sustain the demand side of our
economic performance. If we cut tax rates now, it will be the consumers who will boost demand and
rescue our industries.

Unfortunately, on the matter of adjusting tax rates, it is the narrowest view of the problem that appears to
hold sway. That will likely doom our economy.

The narrowest view is always that held by the Secretary of Finance. It is his job, of course, to generate
the maximum revenue for government. That job dictates he tax everything in sight, whether this be
Balikbayan boxes or the tenuous incomes of our workers.

As well-intentioned legislators in both houses of our Congress worked frantically to reform the tax rates,
Finance Secretary Cesar Purisima issued his potion by way of a text message. The message read: We
could not put our fiscal sustainability and credit rating at risk by doing piecemeal revenue reducing
legislation.

That message, strangely, was immediately echoed by Palace spokesmen, making it appear to be the
position of the executive branch. That created a political roadblock to the reform of the tax rates.

Not only is there very little time left to enact tax reform legislation, it now appears there is very little wind
to drive the sails of the tax reformers.

Purisima makes it appear that reducing the tax rates will undermine our competitiveness. That is very
wrong. What undermines our competitiveness, in this era of ASEAN regional integration, is to have the
highest tax rates in the community of nations. The high tax rates induce pressure to raise wages in order
to boost disposable income. Higher wages will make us uncompetitive.

The Philippines now has among the highest nominal wages in the region. Taxes eat up the wages
anyway, shrinking the effective demand capacity of our workers.

Purisima is likewise wrong when he says adjusting our tax rate to inflation will reduce our fiscal
sustainability. If we adjust our income tax rates to inflation, government stands to lose only P40 billion in
revenues. This revenue reduction may be easily covered by improving anti-smuggling efforts. Rampant
smuggling is estimated to account for about P200 billion in tax leakage annually.

Besides, for 2014, government failed to spend about a third of the national budget. Its capacity for
underspending is matched only by its obsessiveness to collect the taxes it already does, even if these
taxes actually distort our economy performance.

Our workers are entitled to the wages they worked hard for. They will, in the end, have a better sense of
how the money ought to be spent. Leave our workers alone to buy better food and invest in housing.
Government only wastes the billions it collects from income taxes.

By standing against tax rates reform, the Aquino administration now finds itself at odds with all wage
earners. The punitive tax rates we have in place will unavoidably become an election issue. When it does,
Aquino will be on the wrong side of the tax debate.

By opposing tax rate reductions, Aquino and his anointed risk being painted insensitive to the plight of the
working class.

The state of the MRT is the icon for this administrations incompetence. The Balikbayan box is now the
icon for its insensitivity.

Failing to adjust the tax rates when it should paints Aquino and his allies as the rouges in an emerging
fiscal morality play. Defending an oppressive tax system, they become the oppressors.

Failing to act on tax reforms when they should have, the administration now becomes the enemy of
overtaxed wage earners.

http://www.philstar.com/opinion/2015/09/05/1496075/tax-rates