SHORT NOTES ON HARVARD AND YALE

LAW JOURNAL
Common and the most interlinked factor of these two are:
1. These two are one of the most oldest reviews of time in memorial
2. These both are most probably published by student of their respective varsity.
The distinct features that these two have are:
1. Harvard is published twice an year and the Yale review is published an enormous of 8
times in an year.
2. Yale review is one of the most cited legal publication in the nation besides Harvard.
3. Yale usually generates the highest number of citations per scheduled article.
4. Unlike Harvard, Yale is entirely edited by students.
5. Yale journal holds a two-part admissions competition each spring, consisting of a
"source and citation exam" followed by a traditional writing competition. Students
may also join the staff if they publish a note in the Journal.
 ABOUT THE VOLUME
This Article is taken from the Volume xiii of Harvard Law Review.
This article was published a long time ago when there was no
difference between Civil and Criminal wrongs.
This was the review, which was entirely composed of ideology and
opinions.
Like the other volumes of the review, no corporate law, no
criminal and no civil liability is too much.
Just a glimpse of the some articles in this volume would show us
the way that, the law in those ages was not so rigid as now.
Advisory opinions of the judges of England by Van Vechten
Veeder, Bentham and Codifiers by Charles Noble Gregory,
Contempt of Court by Wilbur Larremor and Mutual premises
in the civi law, Dependency by Samuel Williston.
 ABOUT THE AUTHOR
He was the most successful judge in his time.
He was even appointed as the Instructor in Criminal Law
He was the Judge of Supreme Court of Maschuttes
Was in the chair of Judge for more than 25 years.
He believed that justice should stand equal for every individual.
At his silver jubilee as Supreme Court judge, he has given a statement that was taken as
an inspirational by every other judge of the supreme court-

My life shall be one of labor and toil. I shall see that the aim of
court shall be lofty and true
NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
Parties to marriage take each other for better or worse.
Divorce is the ordinary way of terminating the marriage condition.
Fraud was well known ground for relief in equity.
Equity courts took that as a good ground.
Matrimony ought to be contracted with utmost freedom and liberty of consent
imaginable.
Wightman v wightman
Effect of deceit or fraud is far more limited than ordinary form of contracts
Oresident Francis H. Jeune --- marriage may be declared null on the ground of fraud or duress
In libel, it has been taken as a good ground for voiding marriage when the things are spoken in
falsified language.
Reynolds v reynolds
This article mainly discusses about voiding of marriage by fraud and deceit ,
Courts intervened because it was effecting the condition of the people
Carris v carris
 NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
FRANKLING GOODRIDGE FESSENDEN
VOLUME 13