You are on page 1of 4

Intensiveengagement.

com Self Evaluation

SELECT THE STATEMENT THAT IS CLOSEST TO YOUR VIEW.


Stage of Beginning Score (2) Intermediate Score (4) Full implementation SCO
LISP (Score 1) (score 3) (Score 5) RE
1. Justificatio Only anecdotal Some crime short There is a long-term The LISP is in a Detailed analysis of long-
n for or professional term data is being pattern of crime in vulnerable locality, term crime patterns and
investing experience is used as well as the locality, and the the issues match flow. Substantial
in used to decide professional problems the crime statistics, performance issues for
Intensive whether this opinion. The experienced are the problem is Police. Locality is
Engageme problem should problems in the complex. This is a complex. demonstrably vulnerable
nt be LISPed area have been problem area for the to system weaknesses.
difficult to tackle sector. Strategic oversight is
present
2. Building The locality is We have some We have an We are beginning Detailed review has been
on very poorly existing contacts inventory of all the to review undertaken and regularly
existing served, or we from prior most important systematically all refreshed, with visual
Assets dont know what incidents but we contacts in the area the groups and audit, record of
might make the dont know what but we dont know communities in the community assets and
locality safe they do and what what they do and locality views about
skills they have what skills they have vulnerabilities and gaps
3. The right We are working We are making Contacts being We are looking for Highly connected,
stakehold with people who new connections refreshed with a view those who are not capable connections
ers have come to with members of to accessing grass the usual suspects, established, and their
our notice the public and roots, capable and those who are self-interest is
through prior seeking their connected people. underrepresented, understood. Whole
interactions with views Those closely who might not population taken into
the public connected to policing think that their account, even those
are primary contacts opinion matters opposed to policing
4. Rich We understand We know what We are discussing We are working Full perspective-taking
picturing what the issues needs to be done, the problems of the with a wide range undertaken with a wide
the are and are but dont have the locality with some of stakeholders to range of contacts and
Problem committing resources to do it members of the get a full, detailed informants, evidence of
police resources all ourselves public to better and rich picture of rich picturing and
to solve the understand how their experiences of developing a deep
problems crime fits with other crime understanding of the
Intensiveengagement.com Self Evaluation

Stage of Beginning Score (2) Intermediate Score (4) Full implementation SCO
LISP (Score 1) (score 3) (Score 5) RE
issues experiences and causes
of crime
5. Establishi We have We have a loose We have got some of We understand the Highly active and
ng a identified a few knit group our stakeholder self-interest of key capable group, cutting
working people we want providing some group interested in members of our across residents,
group to work with guidance and being involved stakeholder group, community groups,
suggestions and have identified statutory agencies and
those with the police taking control of
strongest social the process, highly
capital motivated and focussed
on delivering
6. Solutions We understand We have Our working group We have a strong A long-term vision of
Rich the problems in developed some beginning to suggest set of solutions, success for the locality
Picture this locality and interventions short-term individual projects has been expressed with
are working hard based on interventions, but and initiatives that clear self-sustaining
to tackle them experience or we are unclear about have been interventions leading to
examples from the long-term developed by the the desired community
other places practices working group outcomes, that are
integrated
7. Interventi We are Some plans being We have clearly We have clearly All working group
ons and committed to developed, but we shared plans, shared plans, partners expressing what
evaluation high quality are not clear on partners from partners from success will look like to
policing of the what the working group have working group have them, full agreement on
problems outcomes will be signed up to signed up to sharing of plans,
implementing their implementing their resources secured to
actions. Success actions. Success support plans
expressed as policing expressed as
outcomes policing outcomes,
stakeholders are
expressing what
success looks like
for them
Intensiveengagement.com Self Evaluation

Stage of Beginning Score (2) Intermediate Score (4) Full implementation SCO
LISP (Score 1) (score 3) (Score 5) RE
8. Escalation The PCSOs are Sergeants and Senior officers Senior officers and The whole hierarchy
tackling all of Senior officers briefed on what senior members of within the police and
the problems slightly aware of issues might block partner agencies external partners are
that occur in plans and issues success, partner have reviewed the collaborating at different
their locality that might arise agencies slightly plan and levels on the root causes
aware committed to of the issues in this
addressing locality and are
potential blocks to implementing solutions
success
9. Embeddin LISPS is led by Sergeants are Whole team aware, Senior officers have Whole team fully
g the PCSOs, with aware of the LISP senior officers oversight over a engaged and understand
Intensive ad hoc support activities and involved but PCSO number of LISPs the detail of LISP
Engageme from sergeants, progress is still expert. PCSOs and they are approach, accountability
nt if they get stuck monitored are being supported informing strategic and responsibility for the
regularly and encouraged plans quality of progress is
shared across the ranks
10. Shared The LISP process The police and Some activities The locality is Working group, led by
control is a Police-led statutory partners shared with those beginning to residents and
(Arnsteins and controlled are the experts closely related to develop a businesses, sharing
ladder) exercise and are informing policing activities collaborative control over the design
the public (like statutory approach to and delivery of a range
partners), identifying and of solutions and
community groups solving problems, practices, the police are
are animated or with ideas being maintaining a watching
chaired by police or offered from all brief
community sections of the
employees community
11. Leadershi PCSO or external Individual PCSOs Unit working Whole team, PCSO, Whole team, PCSO,
p advisor seen as initiative is being together with trained officers, specials, officers, specials,
expert recognised and PCSO as lead volunteers, cadets volunteers, cadets and
celebrated and sergeant sergeant supported by
supported by active active involvement of
Intensiveengagement.com Self Evaluation

Stage of Beginning Score (2) Intermediate Score (4) Full implementation SCO
LISP (Score 1) (score 3) (Score 5) RE
involvement of command. Detection and
command. other police functions
using intelligence
created by the initiative.
Successes are being
actively shared and
adopted