SmartFren LTE Rollout Project

Cluster performance Report
City : Palembang
Frequency Carrier : 39050 & 39194 (TDD)
CLUSTER NAME/ID : NPLB_0
Cluster Type : Non Golden
Phase : 2C

SmartFren Radio Planning Team Nokia NPO Team
REVIEW/ACCEPT BY: REVIEW/ACCEPT BY:

NAME:________________________________ NAME:_________________________________

SIGNATURE:__________________________ SIGNATURE:___________________________

DATE:________________________________ DATE:_________________________________

Nokia YYY/MM/DD 0

Cluster Name : NPLB_0

Frequency CLUSTER Test Engineer Test date
Carrier NAME/ID
Frequency Carrier : 39050 & 39194
Technology
LTE 39050 & 39194 NPLB_0 Deddy 2-3 Dec 2016
Contents
1. Cluster Site Database.............................................................................................3
2. Coverage Prediction...............................................................................................3
3. Summary................................................................................................................4
4. Cluster Information................................................................................................5
4.1 Cluster Route...................................................................................................5
4.2 NPLB_0
Cluster performance Report
CLUSTER NAME/ID :
Site Information...............................................................................................5
5. Cluster Type : Non Golden
KPI Statistics..........................................................................................................6
5.1
: 2C
KPIs Table.......................................................................................................6
Phase
5.2 Throughput Distribution Graph.......................................................................7
6.
: TDD
Map View...............................................................................................................8
Technology
6.1 RSRP & SINR.................................................................................................8
6.2 DL & UL Throughput Plot..............................................................................9
6.3 20MHz Downlink Throughput Plot...............................................................10
6.4 Test Engineer : DT
MIMO Mode Plot..........................................................................................11
6.5 Test date : December 2016
MCS allocation Plot......................................................................................12
6.6 PCI Plot & EARFCN Plot.............................................................................13
6.7 MOS Plot.......................................................................................................14
6.8 CQI Plot.........................................................................................................15
7. OPTIMIZATION/ACTION.................................................................................16
8. Appendix..............................................................................................................17
8.1 Legends..........................................................................................................17
8.2 Blocking Routes............................................................................................18

Number/Version Date
PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 1 (21)

0 2015/10/02 2 (21) . Cluster Site Database Table 1. Site Database Sr E-NodeB Vendor_ID Cell Name Long Lat TAC PCI Status No ID 1 2 3 2. Coverage Prediction Prediction RSRP vs DT RSRP Figure 1. Cluster Name : NPLB_0 1. Coverage Plot Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1.

mini cluster to be considered as non- golden cluster in term of KPI acceptance 7.1 Cluster Route Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1. Artificial loading will not be used in any cluster since the KPIs are for multi user. 5. PAC report will be approved by SF NPO/RF team.00% 100% Pass Retainability ERAB Drop Rate 1.0 15. Golden or non-golden definition of the mini cluster will use existing boundary from phase 1. However. Smartfren will compare RSRP difference of optimization and PAC from DT logs or they can join the PAC DT to ensure no attenuator was used. 8. Summary Table 2. 4.7 Pending Pass Integrity Average SINR 9. No throughput commitment for TDD non GC.03 Pass Note: 1.00% #DIV/0! Retainability VoLTE call drop rate 1. KPI Summary Item Test Target KPI Achieved Pass/Fail Accessibility RRC Connection Request Success Rate 99. Cluster Name : NPLB_0 3. SINR is added as new KPI 3. first tier neighbor boundary) 6. Average throughput for UL & DL are modified from Phase 1 KPIs since Phase2C uses multiuser target. Nokia will provide analysis and justification for remaining bad spot.84 NA Integrity 5th Percentile DL user throughput 30MHz NA 29216.00% 0% Pass Mobility Handover success rate 99. Drive test attenuator will not be used in TDD. since the coverage is still not continuous 4. In case the new site is located in new coverage cluster.00% #VALUE! Accessibility VoLTE Session Setup Success Rate 99.00% #VALUE! Pass Integrity Average Handover Interruption Time 60ms NA Integrity Average DL user throughput 30MHz NA 56036. If KPIs as above table is achieved. 10. PAC DT and KPI approval will be based on mini cluster PAC concept (single site cluster.0 2015/10/02 3 (21) .79 NA Integrity Average UL user throughput-20MHz NA #DIV/0! NA Integrity 5th Percentile UL user throughput-20MHz NA #NUM! NA Integrity Average VoLTE Mean Opinion Score 3. further justification using PRB is not applicable 2. All optimization activities will be included in the PAC report hence there is no separate optimization report for mini cluster acceptance 9. Cluster Information 4.

0 2015/10/02 4 (21) .2 Site Information Table 3. Cluster Name : NPLB_0 Figure 2. Cluster Route 4. Site Information Number of site Number of cell % on air site % on air cell 1 3 100 100 Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1.

Cluster Name : NPLB_0 5.84 UL Throughput 20 Mhz 0 #NUM! #DIV/0! Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1. KPI Statistics 5.0 2015/10/02 5 (21) . Throughput Throughput . Retainability KPI Name # of attempt # of Failure Failure rate % ERAB Drop Rate #DIV/0! VoLTE Dropout Rate N/A N/A 0 Table 6.5th KPI Name # of Sample Average Throughput Percentile DL Throughput 30 Mhz 1447 29216.03 Table 7.1 KPIs Table Table 4. Integrity KPI Name # of attempt Average Handover interruption time NA VoLTE MOS N/A N/A Average SINR 1447 15.79 56036. Accessibility KPI Name # of attempt # of Successful attempt Success rate % RRC Connection Request Success Rate NA Handover Success Rate NA VoLTE Setup Success Rate N/A N/A 100 Table 5.

17 1.35 1.8 0.53 0 0.2 2 0. UL Throughput Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1.93 32.35 0 Throughput Figure 3.5 6 0.6 Perc ent 0.2 Throughput Distribution Graph PDSCH Phy Throughput (kbps) PDF CDF 70 120 62.3 0.4 60 100 100 100 50 80 40 67.7 8 0. DL Throughput PUSCH Phy Throughput (kbps) CDF 1 12 0.9 10 0.1 0 0 Throughput Figure 4.4 4 0. Cluster Name : NPLB_0 5.52 5.0 2015/10/02 6 (21) .07 60 30 40 Perc ent 20 10 20 4.01 0.

Map View 6.0 2015/10/02 7 (21) .1 RSRP & SINR Figure 5. RSRP Plot Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1. Cluster Name : NPLB_0 6.

0 2015/10/02 8 (21) . SINR Plot Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1. Cluster Name : NPLB_0 Figure 6.

UL Throughput Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1. DL Throughput Figure 8.0 2015/10/02 9 (21) .2 DL & UL Throughput Plot {image:CA_Tput_DL. Cluster Name : NPLB_0 6.jpg} >> Manually generated for CA Figure 7.

Cluster Name : NPLB_0 6.3 20MHz Downlink Throughput Plot Figure 9. DL Throughput BW 20 Mhz Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 10 (21) .

MIMO Plot Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1.4 MIMO Mode Plot Figure 10.0 2015/10/02 11 (21) . Cluster Name : NPLB_0 6.

45 60 50 40 36. MIMO Graph Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1.55 Perc ent 30 20 10 0 3 4 1 2 Rank Indic ator Figure 11. Cluster Name : NPLB_0 MIMO Mode Graph MIMO Mode 70 63.0 2015/10/02 12 (21) .

Cluster Name : NPLB_0 6.0 2015/10/02 13 (21) .5 MCS allocation Plot Figure 82. MCS Allocation Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1.

62 10 0 16QAM 64QAM QPSK MCS Figure 13.0 2015/10/02 14 (21) .01 50 40 35.36 30 Perc ent 20 10. MCS Allocation Graph Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1. Cluster Name : NPLB_0 Modulation and Coding Scheme Graph MCS PDSCH 60 54.

Cluster Name : NPLB_0 6.0 2015/10/02 15 (21) . EARFCN Plot Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1.6 PCI Plot & EARFCN Plot Figure 14. PCI Plot Figure 15.

MOS Plot Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1.0 2015/10/02 16 (21) . Cluster Name : NPLB_0 6.7 MOS Plot Figure 16.

0 (11) 0.0%  >=3.0 2015/10/02 17 (21) .3%  Above 15.8%  >=6.0 to <6.8 CQI Plot Figure 17.3%  >=9.3%  >=12.3% Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1.0 (297) 22.0 (575) 43. Cluster Name : NPLB_0 6.0 (4) 0.0 to <12.0 (442) 33.0 to <9.0 (0) 0. CQI Plot SuperStream001-LTE_UE_WideBand_CQI_Average ()  Below 3.0 to <15.

Cluster Name : NPLB_0 7. Optimization N Clust Spot Tec Analys Action Action Plan Bad Spot REMAR o er Number h is Plan Status Status K 1 Based on Covplot SINR: there is no badspot Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1. OPTIMIZATION/ACTION Table 8.0 2015/10/02 18 (21) .

Cluster Name : NPLB_0 8.0 2015/10/02 19 (21) .1 Legends Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1. Appendix 8.

0 2015/10/02 20 (21) .2 Blocking Routes Number/Version Date PAC Report / V1. Cluster Name : NPLB_0 8.