Santa Clara County Presiding Judge admits neither Santa Clara County Courts, multiple judicial officers or the Commission on Judicial Performance had any idea what to do about attorney Nat Hales who was paid over $100,000 in the Marriage of Bassi , appointed By Judge Erica Yew while Ms. Yew was Chair of the CJP , and where Nat Hales confessed to the State Bar in 2016 that he never had jurisdiction, statutory authority or consent and where he admitted to violating Professional Rules of Conduct 1-710 and where he admitted to violating Canon 6 of the California Judicial Code of Ethics, when he ordered a publisher's real property sold, recommended the publisher be declared vexations, acted under the color of law in an effort to influence a forensic CPA and sanctioned a wife $50,000 in Family Code 271 sanctions, as he took $100,000 for his won fees in orders he made and had Brad Baugh obtain signature from Judge Mary Ann Grilli and Judge James Towery.
Original Title
Santa Clara County Judge- Response Letter on Nat Hales 639 and 638 Issues
Santa Clara County Presiding Judge admits neither Santa Clara County Courts, multiple judicial officers or the Commission on Judicial Performance had any idea what to do about attorney Nat Hales who was paid over $100,000 in the Marriage of Bassi , appointed By Judge Erica Yew while Ms. Yew was Chair of the CJP , and where Nat Hales confessed to the State Bar in 2016 that he never had jurisdiction, statutory authority or consent and where he admitted to violating Professional Rules of Conduct 1-710 and where he admitted to violating Canon 6 of the California Judicial Code of Ethics, when he ordered a publisher's real property sold, recommended the publisher be declared vexations, acted under the color of law in an effort to influence a forensic CPA and sanctioned a wife $50,000 in Family Code 271 sanctions, as he took $100,000 for his won fees in orders he made and had Brad Baugh obtain signature from Judge Mary Ann Grilli and Judge James Towery.
Santa Clara County Presiding Judge admits neither Santa Clara County Courts, multiple judicial officers or the Commission on Judicial Performance had any idea what to do about attorney Nat Hales who was paid over $100,000 in the Marriage of Bassi , appointed By Judge Erica Yew while Ms. Yew was Chair of the CJP , and where Nat Hales confessed to the State Bar in 2016 that he never had jurisdiction, statutory authority or consent and where he admitted to violating Professional Rules of Conduct 1-710 and where he admitted to violating Canon 6 of the California Judicial Code of Ethics, when he ordered a publisher's real property sold, recommended the publisher be declared vexations, acted under the color of law in an effort to influence a forensic CPA and sanctioned a wife $50,000 in Family Code 271 sanctions, as he took $100,000 for his won fees in orders he made and had Brad Baugh obtain signature from Judge Mary Ann Grilli and Judge James Towery.
Superior Court of California
County of Santa Clara
191 North Fins Stest
San Joe, Calflora 95113
(408 882-2700
Chambers of
HON. PATRICIA M. LUCAS, Presiding Judge
March 24, 2017
Susan Bassi
P.O. Box 2220
Los Gatos, CA 95031
Re: Referee Nat Hales
Dear Ms. Bassi:
‘This follows up on our correspondence in January and February concerning your
complaint about Nat Hales. Your specific concern, as framed by your January 17, 2017 letter
at page 2, was that Mr. Hales “never filed a certification, oath or written statement to serve as
areferee.” According to your letter at page 3, Mr. Hales withdrew from his appointment as
referee in Case No. 2012-6-FL-09065 on October 23, 2015. You also mentioned that Mr.
Hales charged you “$100,000, without a fee agreement.” T understand that Mr. Hales
subsequently withdrew the invoices for interest.
Shortly after receiving your letter, I undertook to investigate the threshold question of
jurisdiction over the conduct of a referee appointed under Code of Civil Procedure sections
638 or 639. Over a period of weeks, the Commission on Judicial Performance initially
advised that the answer was unclear, then advised that the Commission did have such
jurisdiction, and then finally concluded that it did not.
Accordingly, I have conducted an investigation, both internal and external, of the
‘matters set forth in your complaint. That investigation is now concluded, and I have taken
appropriate corrective action to ensure that all judicial officers are aware of the obligations of
court-appointed referees imposed by Rule of Court 3.904 and 3.924 and take action to ensure
compliance. [have taken further action to ensure that should a judicial officer decide to
appoint Mr. Hales as a referee in another case, extra steps are taken to ensure his compliance
with those Rules.
Very truly yours,
Fen he. ew
Patricia M. Lucas
Presiding Judge
Santa Clara County Superior Court
Letter from the Commission on Judicial Performance Related to Complaints: Judge Lucas, Judge James Towery, Judge Mary Ann Grilli, Judge Mark Pierce , Judge Mary Arand, Judge Drew Takachi