Developments in Indian
Administrative Law
UPENDRA BAXI*
\
seven a are review of the gosrl penile, of edminiatve
eae SDuning exerci. Tb nat nt beau the
sad sofa fx ical respons to the problems
erie salning amiistave power and drain
of src om ore unt that thesis contol
What ay ma ech i aa gots yond asa
nei of Poet en in eal dotines, rato extend te the
et lic powsr and authority With
teat ens rough jal essence :
i of ea a wher cout anywhere ave been powefl
sR operating an tos of eat in be eer of
imam hey ate sided by at overall pola rir
public owes aie of eccoutbiy. In Fi, thelac of ¢tble
masini ae ure oral aporoprate mecharsns=¥eh
a ems a ora nystem af ribuals—ias exposed tbe courts
Fe mot un of refing everaayexcenes of adit
1 am of creating oad susaning an thos of Wel
ate ponte a aro public power. To understand wheter
aa en oh hei process as important it
ea rey ih excess of power ars epsdialycombrted
Fade aticicn, Treditonal wring on adinisrative lw
Ho a lly on the second aspect. We cndeavout 2
concen ats ay ape ager eoount of administra 1
(evctopmentsin tna?
adie M2 ca, The hs Anite Za 97D, 3
—
|
|
|
Derelopments ts Indian Adiisrtive Low 13
Another chapar i this volume deals with the evolution of concepts
and techniques by. which the courts in Tadiahave, through constant
Feintrpretation of jc powers uadee the Constitution, manage!
the exersse and excests of adainistrative power. In this chapter,
tte ry to daa only with the evoltion of som speci principles and
“octracs ef fairness, rather than with the processes or problems of
fesivation of remedy srueures fr actual ai.
‘Tie RuLE OF Law NOTION AS GROUNDNOR OF
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW
-The concept ofthe “rule of lays the mainspring of the principles
of administrative Taw. Over & period of time, the concept his Been
Sherationalced as meaning abarnce, or at any rate diminution, of
TRSinasness inthe exerci of public power. The Consttion
Srnbouis many facets thi concept in several of its provisions,
cluding thot of Part UT which guarantee fundamental rights. The
Thuan experience is athe unique i thatthe courts, and pacewarly
the Supreme Cour, had to pronounce ther understandings of the
Scnoopt repeatedly. In Kesaranande? there occurred refreshing
Uislogve on the sue whether the concept of the rale of lw was
Sse an aspoet ofthe datrine of base structure of the Constittion,
sihich even the plenary power of Parliament eanaot reach o amend.
Turdislopuecontinued among justices ofthe Supreme Conrt during
the lateral emergency of 1975-77. In Jndva Nehru Gand an sm
Ghument to the Constitution (immunizing. the lection dispute
1356" Macias Caw fence taied st th ft wooo Aid inthe
"or comemporaneou scouts of developments a tis ar, cont ch
ak Sere of Ins Loni La ata sd contin othe
‘kl of he tit a lee, hereto io respetay ws 4.8.10
"rib onrbon by DX: Sing thi volume.
EEonmnte Bh Sit of Berle, AIR. 1973 SC. 146
(ina Nees Gomi el Novae, AUR. 1578 SC. 299a able Law in Indie
involving the Prime Minister from any kind of judicial review), was
invalidated by Khansa and Chandrachud, on the ground that it
violated the concept of the rule ofa, which was anaspect ofthe
basicstruture. Other Justices didnot take this route to invalidation
complaining ia exence that the concept cannot posess « “brooding
omnipresence” over the specie provisions ofthe Constitution, In
the Flabas Corpus case? tho argument was pressed that the exeative
cannot even in times of an emergency entaling suspension ofthe bill
‘of rights, atin voltion ofthe concept of the rule of aw a the
‘obligation to act in accordance with the ral o aw. sa cates
feature of our constittioal system and is @ basle feature of the
CConstttion". Although there wat rome confusion ao the satis
ofthe concept during the period ofthe emergeney and some justices
‘went 50 Tar a t0 suggest that the emergeney provisions themselves
constitute the rale of aw during sch a repime,the opiaions closely
read do suggest the conclusion tht the contention of the petitioners
‘wan accepted inthe reasoning of al the five opinions, though uafor:
tanatly not in resule® The revlt was a creel drafted order, as
the court was itelfto later so characterize which eft detenus wi
ro remedy against any arbitrary exer of authority. But deite
{his distortion, whose severe consequences were tragically documen-
ted ina denial ofall odisial elit even as regards the conditions of
detention Kesevanand,Indre Gandhi andthe Habeas Corpus eases
provide a distillation of fndian judicial thought onthe conesptions
‘ofthe rule of aw, which has evolved well over a quarter century.
References to Wester theorist and thinkers from Dicey onwards
abound in these opinions; but thse oceut by way of rhetorical
flourishes, masking the typically Indian approaches.
‘Whee one reflects upon deiional fw inthis ares, one finds that
the concept of the ruloflaw thus developed has several sompoaet,
‘One is that power should not be exereized arbitrarily. This has meant
that it shouldbe exercised fr the purposes for which it has. been
conferred? It also means that power should be exerisd within the
ADM. Jalan Shale, AIR. 1976 $C. 12
‘SLM. Serva The Emorecy, Pure Seed a he Habeas Coat
cave, 197% Tipe, UB, Fe Inn Soprone Coe od Poe, 1980,
ice hoo Comper.
"See Mr Doe Be’ bration ir Sha Lal
Unio of In Bhar, ALR. 1996 8.6. a0
‘Ee Sie of Bonky WAP Resin, ALR. 1908.0. 123.
Developments i Indian Adminitrative Law 4135
statutory ambit and purported eerie of it would not just be ara
tes bet fa ate sone of he erm arian. Simple negation ot
biarnes i however, not enough to prone the ral of ae
Yalues. Indian courts have go furbe to inst on apse psi
content of thera of law obligation, These inclae te iaey of
Tatra Justice which have to be flioned not jot in uaud
Acton but often also in purely adminstatve aston’™ The seme
{nd conteat of the requirements of ata ase hae varied fee
time to time according tothe juicalinterretaion Wut the bnoed
fnnltence remains. In adiion, aosan to information Lo the
‘rounds of dechion hs remained an important prececapation ofthe
Tadian Judiciary, a» aay impediments to it have the tendon ot
busing jul revi of min taive sin, Ths nears tat
‘he cout have from tine tone insisted tat eee of adn
‘ie power be scconpaniad by reason ahough he exact tats
‘the obligation to give reson vas yr indstrmtate
Therule oflaw nation has bes in addon comvstnty extended
to sect for the individ fr dang bythe State int somone
sts Fr example the government shld bound by issonraces
to individuals in busts tatactonsby-vay of extoppe™ The
Sane hat to ell some ofthe als of mural sce Deore reach
ing deion that it would to trade with gen enacts oc
bofore blacklisting them" Tn tr ivalving poverament contract
{he ours have bcm nereasingly Keon to ist that the ambit of
fala is ot lesened in vif the dominating capacity of te
Sate over he individals™ Inthe are of ones and injury sing
oof heStatesconomietrprncuia fonction cout have tended
to esi the cope ofthe defen of wvereign munity i fect
of the affected individuals We review the dehional lew on soe
ofthese mater in hs chapter Stic to say Deve tha the Tle
Of law concepts evened y he odin jain extends nt nt
{0 providing a amenork of negative contains on povetametal
Aeton but ao to imporions of peste conde onthe Site
se section V, inf
Use ote 28 _—
see sec Xf
"Ser estonia36 Pde Law i Pda
uit afew respects then the Indun administrative law transcends
the ispiration and model of judicial intervention found in cosmo
polit Jurisprudence of Anglo-American decisional av; although
Suita discourse remainseuTused with quite deveptive reliance on
"hese very sources,
“Tw StvaRATION oF Powsn,
The separation of powers doctrine, as an emanation of the rule
of ta values, bas been a dierte ates for judicial pronouncements
in India. Tt has been acknowledged in a longline of fndian deisons
that the Constitution doce not envisage any strict separation of|
powers. Apart from the drcti principle embodied in Arti 50
wich enjoin separation of judiciary from executive, the const
Vionl scheme des not ountenace any dogmatic ivsion of powers.
For example, the President of India has wide legislative powers. OF
his wide power 40 promulgate ordinances daring the recess of the
Howic of Pavliament, it as boon ai that its “extent and scope
would have aon eves by Heney VIII and would have taken the
Judges ofthe Cae of Proclamations by surprise" The system of
Psi ain the states provides another example ™ When the
separation of posters doctrine was urged in the Bits as denying, or
nthe alterative substantively restraining, wide grant of delegated
legistive powers tothe execntive, the Supreme Court uphelt such