© All Rights Reserved

6 views

© All Rights Reserved

- Prisoners Short
- Learning Curve 1
- MTAP 2012 Math4
- 4037_s04_er
- AverageRateofChange.pdf
- Differential Equations
- m311
- Best Sql_plsql Material
- A2_NA
- ME_session 5
- ordersofinfinity00harduoft
- BUSMATH(1)
- Time Complexity
- winsteps-tutorial-1.pdf
- 14_5
- Pruebas de Presion 4
- ch10_4e
- p 5 Ch 16 Learning Curve Theory
- Ej-2 Curvas Tipo
- Series l of Oh Lines Bundling Transposition

You are on page 1of 46

Prot maximization

Exercises of Microeconomics

Technology and Prot Maximization (Ch. 1-2 Varian)

Technology

Prot maximization

Outline

1 Technology

Exercise 1.2

Exercise 1.3

Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

2 Prot maximization

Exercise 2.3

Exercise 2.4

Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Outline

1 Technology

Exercise 1.2

Exercise 1.3

Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

2 Prot maximization

Exercise 2.3

Exercise 2.4

Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Exercise 1.2

technology y = a x + a x when a 6= a ?

/ 1

1 1 2 2 1 2

the curvature of an isoquant and can be calculated as:

TRS d (x /x ) 2 1

=

(x /x ) dTRS

2 1

d ln(x /x )

2 1

=

d ln |TRS |

Tramontana Exercises Micro

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Solution

Remember that:

f / x1

TRS =

f / x2

in our case:

1

f 1 1

= ax

+ a2 x2

a x 1

for i = 1, 2

xi

1 1 i i

from which:

a x

!1

TRS = 1 1

a 2 x 2

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Solution

so that:

1

x2 a2 1

= TRS

x1 a1

and taking logs:

x 1 a

!

ln ln |TRS | + ln

2 2

= ,

x1 1 a 1

d ln(x /x )

2 1 1

= = .

d ln |TRS | 1

Tramontana Exercises Micro

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Outline

1 Technology

Exercise 1.2

Exercise 1.3

Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

2 Prot maximization

Exercise 2.3

Exercise 2.4

Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Exercise 1.3

f (x) xi

i (x ) =

xi f (x)

a

1

b

2

function with respect to the factor x : 1

f (x)

= ax1a1 x2b

x1

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Solution

f (x) x1 ax x a b

1 (x ) = = 1 2

=a

x1 f (x) xx a

1

b

2

f (x) x2 bx x a b

2 (x ) = = 1 2

= b.

x2 f (x) xx a

1

b

2

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Solution

following alternative denition:

d ln f (x)

i (x ) =

d ln x i

ln f (x ) = ln x x = ln x + ln x

a

1

b

2 1

a b

2

that is

ln f (x ) = a ln x + b ln x

1 2

and nally:

d ln f (x) d ln f (x)

1 (x ) = =a ; 2 (x ) = =b .

d ln x1 d ln x 2

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Outline

Exercise 1.2

Exercise 1.3

Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

2 Prot maximization

Exercise 2.3

Exercise 2.4

Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Exercise 1.5

1/

1 2

?

dy (t ) t

e (x) =

dt y =t 1

or:

df (t x) t

e (x) =

dt f (t x) = t 1

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Solution

f (t x) = (tx ) + (tx2 ) =t x + x

1/ 1/

1 1 2

that is:

f (t x) = tf (x).

The CES function exhibits constant returns to scale.

In particular:

df (t x) t dtf (x) t

e (x) = = = 1.

dt f (t x) = t 1

dt tf (x) = t 1

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Solution

The elasticity of scale can be written as:

d ln f (t x)

e (x) =

d ln t = t 1

In our case:

1

ln f (tx ) = ln t + ln x + x

1 2

so:

e (x) = 1.

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Outline

Exercise 1.2

Exercise 1.3

Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

2 Prot maximization

Exercise 2.3

Exercise 2.4

Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Exercise 1.9

1/

1 2 1 1 2 2

write this in the form

f (x , x ) = A() bx + (1 b)x

1 2 1

/

2

. 1

a + a2

Let us multiply the parameters a and a by = 1:

1

1 2

a 1 + a2

# 1

(a + a )a (a + a )a

"

f (x1 , x2 ) = 1 2 1 x1 + 1 2 2 x2 .

a1 + a2 a1 + a2

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Solution

# 1

a a

"

1

f (x , x ) = (a1 + a2 )

1

x + 2

x

1 2

a 1 + a2 1

a 1 + a2 2

a a

and by noting that = 1 we can nally have:

2 1

a 1 + a2 a 1 + a2

f (x , x ) = A() bx + (1 b)x

1/

1 2 1 2

1 a

where A() = (a + a ) and b = .

1

1 2

a +a 1 2

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Outline

Exercise 1.2

Exercise 1.3

Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

2 Prot maximization

Exercise 2.3

Exercise 2.4

Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Exercise 1.11

and/or convex. Assume that the parameters a and b and the

output levels are strictly positive.

V (y ):

closed (it must include its own boundary)

non-empty (each positive level of output can be produced)

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

1 2 1 2

This is a case in which the isoquants look like the isoquants of the

Leontief technology.

The main dierence is that output is measured in terms of log y :

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Solution

(regular), monotonic and convex.

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

(b) V (y ) = {x , x : ax + bx y , x > 0}

1 2 1 2 1

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Solution

regular.

In fact:

you can produce the quantity y with combinations of inputs in

which x is arbitrarily low, but not equal to 0. So the input

1

V (y ) is also monotonic and convex.

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

(c) V (y ) = x , x : ax + x x + bx y

1 2 1 1 2 2

In order to prove monotonicity we must calculate the rst

derivatives:

f (x1 ,x2 )

x1 = a + 2xx21 x2 0

f (x1 ,x2 )

x2 = b + 2xx11 x2 0

so V (y ) is monotonic.

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Solution

necessary) to show that the production function is concave.

We need to calculate the Hessian matrix, so we need the second

derivatives:

32 1 1 1

f (x1 ,x2 )

x12

= 14 x1 x2

2

f (x1 ,x2 )

x1 x2 = x2 x2

1

4 1 2

12 12 1 3

f (x1 ,x2 )

x1 x2 = 1

4

x x

1 2

f (x1 ,x2 )

x22

= x2x 2

1

4 1 2

Exercise 1.2

Technology Exercise 1.3

Prot maximization Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

Solution

3 1

D 1 = 14 x1 2 x22 < 0

D 2 = 16 x1

1

x2 161 x11 x21 = 0

1 1

function is concave and the input requirement set is convex.

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Outline

Exercise 1.2

Exercise 1.3

Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

2 Prot maximization

Exercise 2.3

Exercise 2.4

Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Exercise 2.3

a

We know (also from the Example in the text) that the rst-oder

condition is given by:

pax a 1

= w,

while the second-order condition is satised when a 1.

By expliciting x we obtain the factor demand function:

1

w a1

!

x (p , w ) =

ap

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Solution

function into the production function:

a

w a1

!

y (p, w ) = f (x (p, w )) = ,

ap

from which we nally have the prot function:

a 1

w a1 w a1

! !

(p , w ) = py (p , w ) wx (p , w ) = p w .

ap ap

Tramontana Exercises Micro

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Solution

a 1

w a1 w a1

! !

(tp , tw ) = tp tw = t (p , w ),

ap ap

then the prot function is homogeneous of degree 1.

In order to prove convexity, it remains useful to see the prot

function as follows:

1 a a 1 1 a

(p , w ) = p 1a w a1 a 1a a 1a = p 1a w a1 (a),

Tramontana Exercises Micro

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Solution

2 (p , w ) 2 (p , w )

D 2 (p, w ) =

p2 p w

(p , w ) (p , w )

2 2

wp w2

2a1 a a 1

p 1a w a1 (1aa)2 p 1a w a1

!

a

(1a)2

= a 1 1 2a (a),

( )2 p 1a w a1

1

a

a

a

(1a)2

p 1a w a1

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Solution

2a1 a

1 = a

(1a)2

p 1a w a1 (a) > 0 , 2 = 0 .

(p , w ) is convex in (p , w ).

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Outline

Exercise 1.2

Exercise 1.3

Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

2 Prot maximization

Exercise 2.3

Exercise 2.4

Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Exercise 2.4

1 2 1

2

2 2 1 1 1 2

1/ 1.

as follows:

d ln(w x /w x ) 2 2 1 1

,

d ln(x /x ) 1 2

ln(w x /w x ) = [ln(w /w ) + ln(x /x )] .

2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Solution

Therefore,

d ln(w x /w x ) d ln(w /w )

1.

2 2 1 1 1 2

=

d ln(x /x ) 1 2 d ln(x /x )2 1

f

w

|TRS | = x1 1

= ,

f

x2

w 2

d ln(w /w ) d ln |TRS |

1 = 1

1 2

d ln(x /x )

2 d ln(x /x )

1 2 1

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Solution

d ln |TRS |

but is the inverse of the elasticity of substitution , so

d ln(x /x )

1 2

1

1

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Outline

Exercise 1.2

Exercise 1.3

Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

2 Prot maximization

Exercise 2.3

Exercise 2.4

Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Exercise 2.5

is 1 .

calculated as follows:

d ln(w x /w x

2 2 1 1 )

.

d ln(w /w )

2 1

ln(w x /w x ) = [ln(w /w ) + ln(x /x )] ,

2 2 1 1 2 1 2 1

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Solution

so we have that:

d ln(w x /w x ) d [ln(w /w ) + ln(x /x )] d ln(x /x )

= 1

2 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1

= ,

d ln(w /w )

2 1 d ln(w /w ) 2 1 d ln |TRS |

and nally:

d ln(w x /w x )

= 1.

2 2 1 1

d ln(w /w )

2 1

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Outline

Exercise 1.2

Exercise 1.3

Exercise 1.5

Exercise 1.9

Exercise 1.11

2 Prot maximization

Exercise 2.3

Exercise 2.4

Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

2

have x 0.

(a) What is the rst-order condition for prot maximization if

x > 0?

We know that:

(x ) = f (x ) wx = 20x x 2 wx

0 (x ) = 20 2x w = 0.

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

From the previous point we know that the optimal level of input is

given by:

20 w

x =

2

which is equal to zero provied that:

w = 20

but also if w > 20, in fact the input level cannot be negative.

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

We must solve:

20 w

x = = 10

2

from which:

w = 0.

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

expliciting x :

20 w w

x= = 10

2 2

but given the physical restriction concerning the non-negativity of

the input's level we should write:

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

Until now we have:

(x , w ) = 20x x 2 wx = (20 w x )x

w

!2

(w ) = 10 .

2

Exercise 2.3

Technology Exercise 2.4

Prot maximization Exercise 2.5

Exercise 2.7

easily calculate the derivative:

w 1

! !

0 (w ) = 2 10

2 2

that is:

w

!

(w ) = 10

0

,

2

which is the negative of the factor demand, as we should expect.

Tramontana Exercises Micro

- Prisoners ShortUploaded byRuth
- Learning Curve 1Uploaded byraj
- MTAP 2012 Math4Uploaded bywhiz31416
- 4037_s04_erUploaded byKhurram Ahmed
- AverageRateofChange.pdfUploaded byJeny Ross Javier Malabanan
- Differential EquationsUploaded bythe nile
- m311Uploaded byEpic Win
- Best Sql_plsql MaterialUploaded byJaffer Ali
- A2_NAUploaded byĦasĦirSalam
- ME_session 5Uploaded byMohit Arora
- ordersofinfinity00harduoftUploaded byDeedlit11
- BUSMATH(1)Uploaded bySuzanne Ysabel Eustaquio
- Time ComplexityUploaded byronnny11
- winsteps-tutorial-1.pdfUploaded bypipequinn
- 14_5Uploaded byPrithviraj Netke
- Pruebas de Presion 4Uploaded byAlberto Celaya
- ch10_4eUploaded byKumarGaurav
- p 5 Ch 16 Learning Curve TheoryUploaded byAmruta Dholakia
- Ej-2 Curvas TipoUploaded byMaria Isabel Martinez Martinez
- Series l of Oh Lines Bundling TranspositionUploaded bySadam Chandio
- hassin.pdfUploaded byMahesh Babu Talupula
- Flow Through WeirsUploaded byMyra Lee Camarista Esmaya
- FunctionsUploaded byAnjaneyulu Nalluri
- SQLUploaded bySYED MUSTAFA
- BTEC Level 3 Unit 04 - WorkbookUploaded byiron_topsl
- Lecture 3.pdfUploaded byAbhishek Akodiya
- exponential & log functions1 LV.pdfUploaded byShafika Aida
- UNIT3Uploaded bytamil
- Lecture 2-Firms' Profit MaximizationUploaded bymuhammad atta ur rehman
- 03-RACEUploaded by07 maths

- Banerjee Duflo Inequality and GrowthUploaded byFrancisco Javier
- White Paper 2014Uploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- A Variance Screen for Collusion.pdfUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- microeco-firsthalfUploaded bypantsonupant
- EconometricsUploaded byAl
- Ethnic Diversity and Economic DevelopmentUploaded byHong Ee Goh
- Multisidedantritrust.pdfUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- International Supply and Distribution Agreements _2Uploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- Antitrust Immunity DOJUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- paisesUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- Ex Parte Correspondence to Mark FowleUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- 140711 - All Immunized AlliancesUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- Multi Side Dan Tri TrustUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- Antitrust Dock GuideliensUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- ChowdhuryUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- AntitrustUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- cemento noruegaUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- Dinamics EconomicsUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- Aboites y Cimoli - IPR and systems of innov.pdfUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- Khan - Intellectual Property and Economic Development - Lessons From American and European HistoryUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- Cartel Detection in Procurement Markets German CartelUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- Tissue Paper Industry_good ReportUploaded byAdnan Ahmad
- 3 Paper Fact SheetUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- Comparison-Tissue-Consumption-Life-expectancy.pdfUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- RodrickUploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza
- Gao09537 Endstage Renal Disease Cms Should Monitor Effect3143Uploaded byFelipe Augusto Diaz Suaza

- Ant Colony Optimization.pdfUploaded byMati Ger
- Book List Basic SciencesUploaded byShyam Sunder
- ABB; Emax, Power BreakersUploaded byElias
- SK-SPP-07 (Painting Coating) - Rev. 00Uploaded byFAROOK
- Study TimetableUploaded bySafiya James
- Chapter10 Linear Programming.docUploaded bysmkpthoe
- 20140403213912Uploaded bygambino_andy
- [UE6100-ZD]BN68-04498A-00-120423Uploaded bymarco_paradiso_2
- 1343_pdfUploaded byfiana
- Steel BS 5950Uploaded byRodain Najjar
- CX310-510_SMUploaded byChristiano Dos Santos
- position_paper_power_blackout_risks.pdfUploaded byAnonymous RluKYotr
- Basic phased arrays Training-.pptUploaded byLương Hồ Vũ
- 1st Quarter Prelim g10Uploaded byNeil Trezley Sunico
- Off-Road in the EmiratesUploaded bybooksarabia
- Psoriasis Is Making My Life Miserable BY Dr Mosaraf Ali.docUploaded byAsad Imran
- Ten Steps to Self Discipline + Visual Stuff!Uploaded byAndrew Lee
- 2013-Optimized Agg Gradation for PCC Mix Designs Evaluation-47BR ConcreteUploaded bygemotorres
- The Pale King: Analyzing “Good People” « Simple RangerUploaded byHaalum
- M.S.thesis Kumar_Analytical Solution for IHCPUploaded byJinsoo Kim
- 1922 Bangwa AssessmentUploaded byFranklin Ngosong Tougwa
- Final E BookUploaded bykrishna_gbpec
- afrpowUploaded byTosin Omonijo
- VR6Uploaded byjorgeerick
- Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation and Difficult Weaning in Critical CareUploaded byCritical Group
- Disadvantages of Absorption Refrigeration Over Vapor Compression Refrigeration CycleUploaded byAngel Jeba
- (the Iowa Series in Andean Studies) George F. Lau-Andean Expressions_ Art and Archaeology of the Recuay Culture-University of Iowa Press (2011)Uploaded byronaldloli
- Nim Upgrade and Advanced TopicsUploaded byPrabu Krishnan
- Forbidden City Assignment (1)Uploaded byArif Ahmed
- B M HegdeUploaded byRajendra Prasad

## Much more than documents.

Discover everything Scribd has to offer, including books and audiobooks from major publishers.

Cancel anytime.