You are on page 1of 18

1. Kim C, Redberg RF, Pavlic T, Eagle KA.

A Systematic Review of Gender

Differences in Mortality after Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery and
Percutaneous Coronary Interventions. Clin Cardiol. 2007;30(10):4915.

2. Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, Bartorelli AL, Bertella E, Antonioli L, et

al. A Long-Term Prognostic Value of Coronary CT Angiography in Suspected
Coronary Artery Disease. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. Elsevier Inc; 2012
Jul 1;5(7):690701.

3. Factors influencing patency of saphenous vein grafts. - PubMed - NCBI.

2016. pp. 12.

4. Gebruiker. Physiological and Morphological Aspects of Coronary

Revascularisation. 2007 Sep 12;:1176.

5. Toumpoulis IK, Anagnostopoulos CE, Balaram SK, Rokkas CK, Swistel DG,
Ashton RC Jr, et al. Assessment of independent predictors for long-term
mortality between women and men after coronary artery bypass grafting:
Are women different from men? The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular
Surgery. 2006 Feb;131(2):34351.

6. Zacho M, Damgaard S, Lilleoer NT, Kelbaek H, Steinbrchel D, Nielsen MB,

et al. Long-term internal thoracic artery bypass graft patency and geometry
assessed by multidetector computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging.
2011 Oct 18;28(6):157783.

7. Ketonen M, Pajunen P, Koukkunen H, Immonen-Rih P, Mustonen J,

Mhnen M, et al. Long-term prognosis after coronary artery bypass
surgery. International Journal of Cardiology. 2008 Feb;124(1):729.

8. Circumflex Coronary Artery Bypass. 2008 Jun 13;:13.

9. van Domburg RT, Meeter K, van Berkel DFM, Veldkamp RF, van Herwerden
LA, Bogers AJJC. Smoking cessation reduces mortality after coronary artery
bypass surgery: a 20-year follow-up study. Journal of the American College
of Cardiology. Elsevier Masson SAS; 2000 Sep 1;36(3):87883.

10. Kinetics of cellular proliferation after arterial injury. I. Smooth muscle growth
in the absence of endothelium. - PubMed - NCBI. 2016. pp. 12.

11. Gaur S, vrehus KA, Dey D, Leipsic J, Btker HE, Jensen JM, et al.
Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary
computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions.
European Heart Journal. 2016 Apr 14;37(15):12207.

12. Collins P, Webb CM, Chong CF, Moat NE, for the Radial Artery Versus
Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) Trial Investigators. Radial Artery Versus
Saphenous Vein Patency Randomized Trial: Five-Year Angiographic Follow-
Up. Circulation. 2008 May 27;117(22):285964.

13. Rosner MH. Acute Kidney Injury Associated with Cardiac Surgery. Clinical
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2005 Nov 9;1(1):1932.

14. LIMA suprav 15 ani. 2000 Aug 17;:14.

15. Jackson ZS, Ishibashi H, Gotlieb AI, Langille BL. Effects of anastomotic
angle on vascular tissue responses at end-to-side arterial grafts. 2001
Aug;34(2):3007. Available from:

16. Calafiore AM, Contini M, Vitolla G, Di Mauro M, Mazzei V, Teodori G, et al.

Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: Long-term clinical and angiographic
results of in situ versus Y grafts. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular
Surgery. 2000 Nov;120(5):9908.

17. Prognostic value of computed tomography angiography and gated single-

photon emission computed tomography in patients with previous coronary
artery graft surgery. 2012 Aug 29;:115.

18. Head SJ, Borgermann J, Osnabrugge RLJ, Kieser TM, Falk V, Taggart DP, et
al. Coronary artery bypass grafting: Part 2--optimizing outcomes and future
prospects. European Heart Journal. 2013 Oct 1;34(37):287386.

19. Origin and Development of the Coronary Arteries. 2009 Nov 17;:18.

20. MD DLG, MD PAK, MD EAT, MD MJD, MSRN MZ, EdD GE. Bilateral internal
thoracic artery grafting improves long-term survival in patients with reduced
ejection fraction: A propensity-matched study with 30-year follow-up. The
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. The American Association
for Thoracic Surgery; 2012 Apr 1;143(4):8444.

21. RestenosisAfterCoronaryAngioplasty. 2005 Apr 7;:115.

22. Bonert M, Myers JG, Fremes S, Williams J, Ethier CR. A Numerical Study of
Blood Flow in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Side-to-Side Anastomoses. Ann
Biomed Eng. 2002 May 29;30(5):599611.

23. Sen B, Niemann B, Roth P, Aser R, Schonburg M, Boning A. Short- and

long-term outcomes in octogenarians after coronary artery bypass surgery.
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2012 Oct 18;42(5):e1027.

24. Theinfluenceofout-of-planegeometryonpulsatileflowwithina distal end-to-side

anastomosis. 2002 Jul 18;:115.

Angiographic outcomes of radial artery versus saphenous vein in coronary
artery bypass graft surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Elsevier Inc; 2013 Aug

26. Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts: 20-Year Clinical Follow-Up. 2016 Aug 19;:1

27. The anastomosis angle does change the flow fields at vascular end-to-side
anastomoses in vivo. 2016 Dec 20;:112.

28. Huen SC, Parikh CR. Predicting Acute Kidney Injury After Cardiac Surgery:
A Systematic Review. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2012 Jan;93(1):337

29. Choudhary BP, Antoniades C, Brading AF, Galione A, Channon K, Taggart

DP. Diabetes Mellitus as a Predictor for Radial Artery Vasoreactivity in
Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Journal of the
American College of Cardiology. 2007 Sep;50(11):104753.

30. Ruttmann E. -Glutamyltransferase as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular

Disease Mortality: An Epidemiological Investigation in a Cohort of 163 944
Austrian Adults. Circulation. 2005 Oct 4;112(14):21307.

31. The cardiovascular system and the biochemistry of grafts used in heart
surgery. 2013 Nov 21;:17.

32. CT angiography for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. 2016. pp. 18.
33. Long-term results of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with dialysis-
dependent renal failure. - PubMed - NCBI. 2016. pp. 12.

34. Prim DA, Zhou B, Hartstone-Rose A, Uline MJ, Shazly T, Eberth JF. A
Mechanical Argument for the Differential Performance of Coronary Artery
Grafts. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. Elsevier;
2015 Sep 19;:136.

35. Li X-M, Rittgers SE. Hemodynamic Factors at the Distal End-to-Side

Anastomosis of a Bypass Graft With Different POS:DOS Flow Ratios. J
Biomech Eng. 2001;123(3):2707.

36. Brien TO, Walsh M, McGloughlin T. On Reducing Abnormal Hemodynamics

in the Femoral End-to-Side Anastomosis: The Influence of Mechanical
Factors. 2005 Jan;33(3):31022. Available from:


better to use the radial artery as a composite graft? Clinical and
angiographic results of aorto-coronary versus Y-graft1. European Journal of
Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2004 Jul;26(1):1107.

38. Negative impact of depression on outcomes in patients with coronary artery

disease: mechanisms, treatment considerations, and future directions. 2005
Apr 25;:112.

39. Long-term outcome after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. 2016. pp. 1

40. Koyama S, Itatani K, Yamamoto T, Miyazaki S, Kitamura T, Taketani T, et al.

Optimal bypass graft design for left anterior descending and diagonal
territory in multivessel coronary disease. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg.
2014 Aug 14;19(3):40613.

41. Flow dynamics within model distal arterial bypass grafts. 2005 Jul pp. 144.

42. Histological Characterization of the Internal Thoracic Artery as Preferred

Conduit for Coronary Bypass. 2016 Oct 17;:14.

43. Reese DE. Development of the Coronary Vessel System. Circulation

Research. 2002 Nov 1;91(9):7618.
44. Numerical study of hemodynamics and wall mechanics in distal end-to-side
anastomoses of bypass grafts. 2001 Dec 28;:112.

45. Total arterial coronary revascularizationpatient selection, stenoses,

conduits, targets. 2013 Aug 2;:18.

46. Fukui S, Fukuda H, Toda K, Yoshitatsu M, Funatsu T, Masai T, et al.

Remodeling of the radial artery anastomosed to the internal thoracic artery
as a composite straight graft. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular
Surgery. 2007 Nov;134(5):113642.

47. Sandoval Y, Brilakis ES, Canoniero M, Yannopoulos D, Garcia S. Complete

Versus Incomplete Coronary Revascularization of Patients With Multivessel
Coronary Artery Disease. Curr Treat Options Cardio Med. 2015 Feb

48. Fan T, Lu Y, Gao Y, Meng J, Tan W, Huo Y, et al. Hemodynamics of Left

Internal Mammary Artery Bypass Graft_ Effect of Anastomotic Geometry,
Coronary Artery Stenosis, and Postoperative Time. Journal of Biomechanics.
Elsevier; 2016 Feb 8;:130.

49. Parissis H, Ramesh BC, Al-Alao B. Which is the best graft for the right
coronary artery? Asian Cardiovascular and Thoracic Annals. 2014 Dec

50. Charytan DM, Yang SS, McGurk S, Rawn J. Long and short-term outcomes
following coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with and without chronic
kidney disease. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. 2010 Oct

51. Arif R, Farag M, Gertner V, Szab G, Weymann A, Veres G, et al. Female

Gender and Differences in Outcome after Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass
Graft Surgery: Does Age Play a Role? Nikitovic-Tzanakaki D, editor. PLoS
ONE. 2016 Feb 4;11(2):e014537115.

52. The Radial Artery in Coronary Surgery: A 5-Year ExperienceClinical and

Angiographic Results. 2001 Dec 18;:16.

53. Simulation study of the fluid dynamics of aorto-coronary bypass. - PubMed -

NCBI. 2016. pp. 11.
54. Daida H, Yokoi H, Miyano H, Mokuno H, Satoh H, Kottke TE, et al. Relation
of saphenous vein graft obstruction to serum cholesterol levels. Journal of
the American College of Cardiology. Elsevier Masson SAS; 1995 Jan

55. Caro CG, Cheshire NJ, Watkins N. Preliminary comparative study of small
amplitude helical and conventional ePTFE arteriovenous shunts in pigs.
Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2005 Jun 2;2(3):2616.

56. Routine Use of Bilateral Skeletonized Internal Mammary Arteries for

Myocardial Revascularization. 1999 Jul 30;:16.

57. The New England. 2001 Mar 15;:110.

58. Dietl CA, Benoit CH, Gilbert CL, Woods EL, Pharr WF, Berkheimer MD, et al.
Which Is the Graft of Choice for the Right Coronary and Posterior
Descending Arteries? : Comparison of the Right Internal Mammary Artery
and the Right Gastroepiploic Artery. Circulation. 1995 Nov 1;92(9):927.

59. Stevens LM, Carrier M, Perrault LP, Hbert Y, Cartier R, Bouchard D, et al.
Influence of diabetes and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts on long-term
outcome for multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting. European Journal
of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2005 Feb;27(2):2818.

60. Ardeshiri M, Faritus Z, Ojaghi Haghighi Z, Bakhshandeh H, Kargar F, Aghili

R. Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on Mortality and Morbidity After Coronary
Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery. Res Cardiovasc Med. 2014 Aug 5;3(3):17.

61. Ramanathan T, Skinner H. Coronary blood flow: Fig. 1. Contin Educ Anaesth
Crit Care Pain. 2005 Mar 9;5(2):614.

62. Bilateral Internal Mammary Artery Grafting: Midterm Results of Pedicled

Versus Skeletonized Conduits. 1999 Jun 7;:16.

63. Modern Therapeutic Strategies for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG).
2007 Dec 11;:110.

64. Shah PJ, Gordon I, Fuller J, Seevanayagam S, Rosalion A, Tatoulis J, et al.

Factors affecting saphenous vein graft patency: clinical and angiographic
study in 1402 symptomatic patients operated on between 1977 and 1999.
The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2003
65. Sabik JF III, Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Houghtaling PL, Cosgrove DM.
Comparison of Saphenous Vein and Internal Thoracic Artery Graft Patency
by Coronary System. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2005 Feb;79(2):544

66. Schelbert HR. Anatomy and physiology of coronary blood flow. J Nucl
Cardiol. 2010 Jun 3;17(4):54554.

67. Coronary artery bypass grafting hemodynamics and anastomosis design: a

biomedical engineering review. 2013 Dec 18;:128.

68. MORRITT D, SHAH S, MORRITT A, KAUL P. Acute transection of the left

internal mammary artery remote from the anastomosis following coronary
artery bypass surgery. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2004

69. Comparative study of functional responses and morphometric state of distal

radial arteries in male and female. - PubMed - NCBI. 2016. pp. 12.

70. 000o 330000000. \

\000A\000G\000R\000U\000T\000T\000A. 2011 Feb 14;:187.

71. Onur Dur STCKOCDHFLBKAKP. Computer-Aided Patient-Specific Coronary

Artery Graft Design Improvements Using CFD Coupled Shape Optimizer.
2015 May 19;:115.

72. Why is the mammary artery so special and what protects it from
atherosclerosis? 2013 Aug 2;:18.

73. MD SM, MD DA, MD GP, MD EB, MD ALB, MD EC, et al. Prognostic Value
of Coronary CTA in Coronary Bypass Patients. 2014 Jun 1;7(6):580
9. Available from:

74. Scienze Mediche Specialistiche. Progetto formativo: Scienze Pneumo-

Cardio-Toraciche di Interesse Medico e Chirurgico. 2009 Jun 26;:153.

75. Acute Kidney Injury Following Cardiac Surgery: Prevention, Diagnosis, and
Management. 2012 Jul 9;:129.
76. Arterial grafts: clinical classification and pharmacological management. 2013
Aug 2;:112.

77. Keynton RS, Evancho MM, Sims RL, Rodway NV, Gobin A, Rittgers SE.
Intimal Hyperplasia and Wall Shear in Arterial Bypass Graft Distal
Anastomoses: An In Vivo Model Study. J Biomech Eng. 2001;123(5):464

78. Mao H, Katz N, Ariyanon W, Blanca-Martos L, Adbelli Z, Giuliani A, et al.

Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury. Cardiorenal Med.

79. Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. Patencies of 2,127 arterial to coronary
conduits over 15 years. 2004 Jan;77(1):93101. Available from:

80. Numerical investigation of the haemodynamics at a patched arterial bypass

anastomosis. 2002 Jul 17;:19.

81. Clinical Applications of Cardiac CT. 2011 Oct 1;:1372.

82. van Domburg RT, Kappetein AP, Bogers AJJC. The clinical outcome after
coronary bypass surgery: a 30-year follow-up study. European Heart
Journal. 2008 Sep 27;30(4):4538.

83. Li H, Xie B, Gu C, Gao M, Zhang F, Wang J, et al. Distal end side-to-side

anastomoses of sequential vein graft to small target coronary arteries
improve intraoperative graft flow. 2014 May 9;14(1):16.

84. Weintraub WS. Twenty-Year Survival After Coronary Artery Surgery: An

Institutional Perspective From Emory University. Circulation. 2003 Feb

85. Mukherjee D, Cheriyan J, Kourliouros A, Athanasiou T. Does the right

internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein graft offer superior
revascularization of the right coronary artery? 2012 Jul 16;15(2):2447.
Available from:

86. Owida AA, Do H, Morsi YS. Numerical analysis of coronary artery bypass
grafts: An over view. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine.
Elsevier Ireland Ltd; 2012 Nov 1;108(2):689705.
87. Ulus T, Yildirir A, Sade LE, Temiz A, Polat E, Bozba H, et al. Serum
gamma-glutamyl transferase activity: new high-risk criteria in acute coronary
syndrome patients? Coronary Artery Disease. 2008 Nov;19(7):48995.

88. Song M-H, Tokuda Y, Ito T. Revival of the side-to-side approach for distal
coronary anastomosis. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2007 Jan

89. Gabriel J, Klimach S, Lang P, Hildick-Smith D. Should computed tomography

angiography supersede invasive coronary angiography for the evaluation of
graft patency following coronary artery bypass graft surgery?: Table 1:.
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jul 22;21(2):2319.

90. Compliance mismatch may promote graftartery intimal hyperplasia by

altering suture-line stresses. 1998 Jun 10;:19.

91. Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Sabik JF, Houghtaling P, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM.
The Effect of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting on Survival During 20
Postoperative Years. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2004 Dec;78(6):2005

92. Numerical simulations of unsteady flows in a stenosed coronary bypass

graft. 2016 Dec 29;:112.

93. Domanski MJ, Borkowf CB, Campeau L, Knatterud GL, White C, Hoogwerf
B, et al. Prognostic factors for atherosclerosis progression in saphenous vein
grafts. 2000 Nov 15;36(6):187783. Available from:

94. Tanaka A, Ishii H, Oshima H, Shibata Y, Tatami Y, Osugi N, et al.

Progression from stenosis to occlusion in the proximal native coronary artery
after coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart and Vessels. Springer Japan;
2015 Jul 14;:15.

95. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, Daniels DV, Jegere S, Kim HS, et al. Diagnosis of
Ischemia-Causing Coronary Stenoses by Noninvasive Fractional Flow
Reserve Computed From Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiograms.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. Elsevier Inc; 2011 Nov
96. Tsukui H, Shinke M, Park YK, Yamazaki K. Longer coronary anastomosis
provides lower energy loss in coronary artery bypass grafting. Heart and
Vessels. Springer Japan; 2016 Jul 29;:17.


SEEVANAYAGAM S, et al. Factors affecting patency of internal thoracic
artery graft: clinical and angiographic study in 1434 symptomatic patients
operated between 1982 and 20021. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic
Surgery. 2004 Jul;26(1):11824.

98. Hadinata IE, Hayward PAR, Hare DL, Matalanis GS, SEEVANAYAGAM S,
ROSALION A, et al. Choice of Conduit for the Right Coronary System: 8-
Year Analysis of Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes Trial. ATS.
Elsevier Inc; 2009 Nov 1;88(5):14049.

99. Amat-Santos IJ, Nombela-Franco L, Garca B, Tobar J, Rods-Cabau J, San

Romn JA. The V-Wave Device for the Treatment of Heart Failure. Initial
Experience in Europe. Revista Espaola de Cardiologa (English Edition).
2015 Sep;68(9):80810.

100. Kabinejadian F, Chua LP, Ghista DN, Sankaranarayanan M, Tan YS. A Novel
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Design of Sequential Anastomoses. Ann
Biomed Eng. 2010 May 22;38(10):313550.

101. Computational design of a bypass graft that minimizes wall shear stress
gradients in the region of the distal anastomosis. 2016 Dec 29;:110.

102. Maniar HS, Sundt TM, Barner HB, Prasad SM, Peterson L, Absi T, et al.
Effect of target stenosis and location on radial artery graft patency. The
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2002 Jan;123(1):4552.

103. PhD BYM, MHSc KDAM, MSc SKSM, MD SD, DipClinEpi JV, BSc RE, et al.
Clinical, biochemical, and genetic predictors of coronary artery bypass graft
failure. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Elsevier Inc;
2014 Aug 1;148(2):515520.e2.

104. de Vries MR, Simons KH, Jukema JW, Braun J, Quax PHA. Vein graft
failure: from pathophysiology to clinical outcomes. Nature Publishing Group.
Nature Publishing Group; 2016 May 19;:120.

105. LIMA suprav 10 ani 1986. 2008 Nov 15;:16.

106. Zahab El Z, Divo E, Kassab A. Minimisation of the wall shear stress
gradients in bypass grafts anastomoses using meshless CFD and genetic
algorithms optimisation. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical
Engineering. 2010 Feb;13(1):3547.

107. Cardiovascular Surgery Saphenous Vein Graft Failure After Coronary Artery
Bypass Surgery. 2014 Oct 10;:17.

108. Importance of the third arterial graft in multiple arterial grafting strategies.
2013 Aug 2;:16.

109. Wong D. Angiographic coronary diffuseness and outcomes in dialysis

patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. European
Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2003 Sep;24(3):38892.

110. Association between Plasma Fibrinogen Level and Saphenous Vein Graft
Patency. 2014 May 9;:16.

111. Locker C, Schaff HV, Dearani JA, Joyce LD, Park SJ, Burkhart HM, et al.
Multiple Arterial Grafts Improve Late Survival of Patients Undergoing
Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Analysis of 8622 Patients With
Multivessel Disease. Circulation. 2012 Aug 27;126(9):102330.

112. Hemodynamic Patterns in Two Models of End-to-Side Vascular Graft

Anastomoses: Effects of Pulsatility, Flow Division, Reynolds Number, and
Hood Length. 2007 Oct 10;:18.

113. 701542003.TIF. 2016 Dec 29;:118.

114. Influence of grafthost diameter ratio on the hemodynamics of CABG. 2006

Feb 24;:113.

115. Muneretto C, Negri A, Bisleri G, Manfredi J, Terrini A, Metra M, et al. Is total

arterial myocardial revascularization with composite grafts a safe and useful
procedure in the elderly?. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.
2003 May;23(5):65764.

116. RAG patenta 5 ani Acar. 2016 Aug 19;:19.

117. Lluri G, Aboulhosn J. Coronary Arterial Development: A Review of Normal

and Congenitally Anomalous Patterns. Clin Cardiol. 2014 Jan 7;37(2):126
118. Antunes PE, de Oliveira JF, Antunes MJ. Coronary surgery in patients with
diabetes mellitus: a risk-adjusted study on early outcome. European Journal
of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2008 Aug;34(2):3705.

119. Leask RL, Butany J, Johnston KW, Ethier CR, Ojha M. Human Saphenous
Vein Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Morphology, Geometry and
Hemodynamics. Ann Biomed Eng. 2005 Jan;33(3):3019.

120. Jose Luis Zamorano JBJKPLLBUS. The ESC Textbook of Cardiovascular

Imaging. 2015 Apr 10;:1661.

121. Current status of arterial grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting. 2013 Aug

122. Stenvinkel P. Coronary Artery Disease in End-Stage Renal Disease: No

Longer a Simple Plumbing Problem. Journal of the American Society of
Nephrology. 2003 Jul 1;14(7):192739.

123. Head SJ, Kieser TM, Falk V, Huysmans HA, Kappetein AP. Coronary artery
bypass grafting: Part 1--the evolution over the first 50 years. European Heart
Journal. 2013 Oct 1;34(37):286272.

124. MD SG, MD YS, MS HRM, MS SAM, MD MC, MD DY, et al. Outcomes After
Complete Versus Incomplete Revascularization of Patients With
Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease. Journal of the American College of
Cardiology. Elsevier Inc; 2013 Oct 15;62(16):142131.

125. Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on

survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single
internal mammary arteries. The Lancet. 2001 Sep;358(9285):8705.

126. Clowes AW, Kirkman TR, Clowes MM. Mechanisms of arterial graft failure. II.
Chronic endothelial and smooth muscle cell proliferation in healing
polytetrafluoroethylene prostheses. Journal of Vascular Surgery. 1986

127. suprav 25 ani post-CABG. 2004 Feb 27;:111.

128. Mannacio V, De Vita A, Antignano A, Mottola M, Di Tommaso L, Graniero A,

et al. Y grafts with the left internal mammary artery and radial artery. Mid-
term functional and angiographic results. Cohort study. International Journal
of Surgery. Elsevier Ltd; 2014;12(9):9527.
129. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, Berman DS, Koo B-K, van Mieghem C, et al.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Fractional Flow Reserve From Anatomic CT
Angiography. JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):12379.

130. Cameron J. Five-Year Angiographic Patency of Radial Artery Bypass Grafts.

Circulation. 2004 Sep 14;110(11_suppl_1):II23II26.


SS. Reduction of sternal wound infections in diabetic patients undergoing off-
pump coronary artery bypass surgery and using modified pedicle bilateral
internal thoracic artery harvest technique. The Journal of Thoracic and
Cardiovascular Surgery. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery;
2012 Aug 1;144(2):4805.

132. Yoshida S, Numata S, Tsutsumi Y, Monta O, Yamazaki S, Seo H, et al.

Short- and long-term results of radial artery and saphenous vein grafts in the
right coronary system: a propensity-matched study. Surgery Today. Springer
Japan; 2016 Aug 8;:19.

133. Ascarelli A, Francone M, Cannata D, Cannavale A, Carbone I, Passariello R.

Role of multidetector CT in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts.
Imaging in Medicine. 2010 Feb;2(1):7786.

134. Vorp DA. The Effect of Proximal Artery Flow on the Hemodynamics at the
Distal Anastomosis of a Vascular Bypass Graft: Computational Study. J
Biomech Eng. 2001 Jun 1;123(3):2777.

135. Dummler S, Eichhorn S, Tesche C, Schreiber U, Voss B, Deutsch M-A, et al.

Pulsatile ex vivo perfusion of human saphenous vein grafts under controlled
pressure conditions increases MMP-2 expression. BioMed Eng OnLine.
BioMed Central Ltd; 2011 Jul 21;10(1):62.

136. Voucharas C, Bisbos A, Zandes N. Plication of the right atrium in order to

confront a right coronary artery under tension graft. Updates Surg. 2011 May

137. Transonic Systems Inc. Native Coronary Competitive Flow during CABG
Surgery. 2015 Jul 15;:14.

138. Yanagawa B, Algarni KD, Yau TM, Rao V, Brister SJ. Improving results for
coronary artery bypass graft surgery in the elderly. European Journal of
Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2012 Aug 11;42(3):50712.
139. SURGICAL RESEARCH. 2007 Sep 20;:17.

140. Tremblay J-A, Stevens L-M, Chandonnet M, Soulez G, Basile F, Prieto I, et

al. A morphometric 3D model of coronary artery bypass graft dysfunction
with multidetector computed tomography. Journal of Clinical Imaging.
Elsevier B.V; 2015 Jul 17;:127.

141. TimHill. Outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. 2007 Jan 25;:1

142. Long-term Graft Patency (3 Years) After CoronaryArtery. 2005 Apr 8;:17.

143. Histology and Morphology of 59 Internal Thoracic Artery Grafts and Their
Distal Anastomoses. 2000 Sep 19;:17.

144. Tranbaugh RF, Dimitrova KR, Friedmann P, Geller CM, Harris LJ, Stelzer P,
et al. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using the Radial Artery: Clinical
Outcomes, Patency, and Need for Reintervention. Circulation. 2012 Sep

145. Habib RH, Schwann TA, Engoren M. Late Effects of Radial Artery Versus
Saphenous Vein Grafting in Patients Aged 70 Years or Older. ATS. Elsevier
Inc; 2012 Nov 1;94(5):147884.

146. The Final 10-Year Follow-Up Results From the BARI Randomized Trial.
Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007 Apr;49(15):16006.

147. Interventional Cardiology Imaging. 2015 Jun 6;:1255.

148. Liao L, Kong DF, Shaw LK, Sketch MH, Milano CA, Lee KL, et al. A New
Anatomic Score for Prognosis After Cardiac Catheterization in Patients with
Previous Bypass Surgery. 2005 Nov 1;46(9):168492. Available from:

149. Frauenfelder T, Boutsianis E, Schertler T, Husmann L, Leschka S,

Poulikakos D, et al. Flow and wall shear stress in end-to-side and side-to-
side anastomosis of venous coronary artery bypass grafts. BioMed Eng
OnLine. 2007;6(1):3513.

150. Stranger in a Strange Land; The Pathogene.sis of Saphenous Vein Graft

Stenosis Wjth Emphasis on Structural and Functional Differences Between
Veins and Arteries. 2003 Sep 24;:124.
151. Masahiko Kuinose KM. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Using Side-to-Side
Anastomosis with Distal End Clipping of the Saphenous Vein Graft. J Vasc
Med Surg. 2014;02(03):12.

152. Ding J, Liu Y, Wang F, Bai F. Impact of Competitive Flow on Hemodynamics

in Coronary Surgery: Numerical Study of ITA-LAD Model. Computational and
Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2012;2012(7):17.

153. Pulsatile Flow and Atherosclerosis in. 2005 Jul 30;:111.

154. Maniar HS, Barner HB, Bailey MS, Prasad SM, Moon MR, Pasque MK, et al.
Radial artery patency: are aortocoronary conduits superior to composite
grafting? The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2003 Nov;76(5):1498504.

155. Pettinari M, Sergeant P, Meuris B. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting

increases long-term survival in elderly patients. European Journal of Cardio-
Thoracic Surgery. 2015 Mar 13;47(4):7039.

156. Chan K, Jarral OA, Jarral RA, Punjabi PP. Avoiding tension in left internal
mammary artery to left anterior descending coronary artery anastomosis
during coronary artery bypass graft surgery. annals. 2013 Jan;95(1):733.

157. Numerical and experimental models of post-operative realistic flows in

stenosed coronary bypasses. 2001 Jun 26;:116.

158. Hu X, Zhao Q. Systematic comparison of the effectiveness of radial artery

and saphenous vein or right internal thoracic artery coronary bypass grafts in
non-left anterior descending coronary arteries. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2011
Apr 5;12(4):2739.

159. Long-term clinical and angiographic follow-up of sequential internal thoracic

artery grafting. 2000 Apr 7;:18.

160. van Straten AHM, Hamad MAS, van Zundert AAJ, Martens EJ, nberger
JPAMS, Woorst ter JFJ, et al. Diabetes and survival after coronary artery
bypass grafting: comparison with an age- and sex-matched population. 2010
May 1;37(5):106874. Available from:

161. Kawamura M, Nakajima H, Kobayashi J, Funatsu T, Otsuka Y, Yagihara T, et

al. Patency rate of the internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending
artery bypass is reduced by competitive flow from the concomitant
saphenous vein graft in the left coronary artery. European Journal of Cardio-
Thoracic Surgery. 2008 Oct;34(4):8338.

162. Une D, Al-Atassi T, Kulik A, Voisine P, Le May M, Ruel M. Impact of

Clopidogrel Plus Aspirin Versus Aspirin Alone on the Progression of Native
Coronary Artery Disease After Bypass Surgery: Analysis From the
Clopidogrel After Surgery for Coronary Artery DiseasE (CASCADE)
Randomized Trial. Circulation. 2014 Sep 8;130(11_suppl_1):S128.

163. Pires-Gomes A, Prez-Pomares J. The Epicardium and Coronary Artery

Formation. JDB. 2013 Dec;1(3):186202.

164. Computational haemodynamics analysis and comparison study of arterio-

venous grafts. 2001 Dec 22;:19.

165. Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, Ovitt T, Sethi G, Copeland JG, et al. Long-
term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after
coronary artery bypass surgery. 2004 Dec 7;44(11):214956. Available from:

166. Original Article. 2008 Jun 11;:17.

167. Angeloni E, Melina G, Benedetto U, Refice S, Capuano F, Roscitano A, et al.

Metabolic Syndrome Affects Midterm Outcome After Coronary Artery Bypass
Grafting. ATS. Elsevier Inc; 2012 Feb 1;93(2):53744.

168. Small GR, Yam Y, Chen L, Ahmed O, Al-Mallah M, Berman DS, et al.
Prognostic Assessment of Coronary Artery Bypass Patients With 64-Slice
Computed Tomography Angiography. 2011 Nov 29;58(23):238995.
Available from:

169. Beijk MA, Harskamp RE. Treatment of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Failure.
In: Artery Bypass. InTech; 2013. pp. 146.

170. Benedetto U, Raja SG, Albanese A, Amrani M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Frati G.

Searching for the second best graft for coronary artery bypass surgery: a
network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. European Journal of
Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2014 Dec 11;47(1):5965.

171. Artery Bypass. InTech; 2013.

172. Jr TBF. Physiology of in-situarterial revascularization in coronary artery
bypass grafting: Preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative factors and
influences. WJC. 2016;8(11):62316.

173. Female Gender Is an Independent Predictor of Operative Mortality After

Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. 2005 Aug 22;:16.

174. A combination of anatomical and functional evaluations improves the

prediction of cardiac event in patients with coronary artery bypass. 2013 Nov

175. MD S-HJ, MD HS, MD SJC, MD HGJ, MD CHC, MD J-WK, et al.

Comparison of radial artery patency according to proximal anastomosis site:
Direct aorta to radial artery anastomosis is superior to radial artery
composite grafting. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.
The American Association for Thoracic Surgery; 2009 Jul 1;138(1):7683.

176. Chow BJW, Ahmed O, Small G, Alghamdi AA, Yam Y, Chen L, et al.
Prognostic Value of CT Angiography in Coronary Bypass Patients. JACC:
Cardiovascular Imaging. Elsevier Inc; 2011 May 1;4(5):496502.

177. Mechanisms and future directions for prevention of vein graft failure in
coronary bypass surgery. 2002 Aug 14;:110.

178. J Trent Magruder MD, Allen Young BA, Joshua C Grimm MD, John V Conte
MD, Ashish S Shah MD, Kaushik Mandal MD, et al. Bilateral Internal
Thoracic Artery Grafting: Does Graft Configuration Affect Outcome? The
Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Elsevier Ltd; 2016 Mar

179. AD0058. 978-3-319-26515-5_Book_OnlinePDF.pdf. 2016 Mar 23;:1267.

180. Clinical Pathoiogic Correlations. 2008 Nov 10;:17.

181. Sankaranarayanan M. Analysis of blood flow in an out-of-plane CABG

model. AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 2006 Feb 24;291(1):H283

182. Kabinejadian F, Chua LP, Ghista DN, Tan YS. CABG MODELS FLOW
VENOUS GRAFT. J Mech Med Biol. 2010 Dec;10(04):593609.
183. Athanasiou T, Saso S, Rao C, Vecht J, Grapsa J, Dunning J, et al. Radial
artery versus saphenous vein conduits for coronary artery bypass surgery:
forty years of competition which conduit offers better patency? A
systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic
Surgery. 2011 Jul;40(1):20820.

184. Borges JC, Lopes N, Soares PR, Gis AF, Stolf NA, Oliveira SA, et al. Five-
year follow-up of angiographic disease progression after medicine,
angioplasty, or surgery. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. BioMed Central
Ltd; 2010 Oct 26;5(1):91.