You are on page 1of 4

Surveys assess agent satisfaction with insurers

Customers' loyalty to agents elevates significance of results

By Phil Zinkewicz

After the colorful Ed Koch was elected mayor of New York City, he would often
begin his speeches with the question: Howm I doing? He also used this catch
phrase with people he met while walking the citys streets or riding the subways. It
was his way of letting New Yorkers know that they had elected a down-to-earth mayor
who really cared about their opinion.

A recently released 2010 Insurance Agency Satisfaction Study for personal lines
business indicates that insurers might do well to ask their agency forces, Howm I
doing? Among other things, the study points out that individual policyholders are
more likely to be loyal to their independent agents than to the insurers who write their

That strong bond between policyholders and insurance agents makes it essential for
insurers to satisfy their appointed agents in order to grow their business, says Jeremy
Bowler, senior director of the insurance practice at J.D. Power and Associates, a
global marketing information services company.

The study also found that insurers whose agents are highly satisfied tend to receive a
considerably greater share of business from those agents. On average, there is more
than a 150-point gap in agency satisfaction between insurers who receive 5% or less
of an agencys business and those who receive more than 60% of an agencys
business, on a 1,000 point scale. In addition, 77% of highly satisfied agents
(satisfaction higher than 950 points) say they intend to increase business with an
insurer, while only 24% of less satisfied agents (satisfaction of 600 points of less) say
the same.

Now in its second year, the study measures the satisfaction of independent insurance
agents and agency staff with the personal property and casualty insurance companies
they represent. Kara Steslicki, senior research manager for J.D. Powers U.S. Services
and Emerging Industries Division, says this particular approach was to obtain the
independent agents and agency principals views of company performance vs. the
views of agency staff.
The 2010 Insurance Agency Satisfaction Study is based on responses from 2,316
insurance agents who evaluated more than 10 insurance companies across the
industry, says Steslicki. Agent satisfaction is examined across six factors. They are:
key carrier contacts (28%); policy offering (20%); technology (17%); claims (14%);
price (14%); and compensation (6%). There are some similarities between last years
study and this years study, according to Steslicki.

Satisfaction levels with technology and claims have increased slightly, but we did
change the methodology so that might account for the difference. Satisfaction levels
with agency compensation are higher than last year. On the other hand, agents are less
satisfied with insurer funds for marketing than last year. The lower trends for funds for
marketing probably are the result of the troubled economy.

The study also finds the following trends:

Fewer agents report being offered marketing dollarsonly 23% in 2010 compared
to 43% in 2009. Satisfaction is higher among agents who are offered marketing

Agent satisfaction with compensation, an important component of the insurer/agent

relationship, has increased to 671 in 2010, compared to 628 a year earlier.

Agents report that commissions and cash rewards are the types of incentives that
best motivate behavior at their agency.

Agency satisfaction with their insurance markets is a subject frequently addressed in

the property/casualty insurance industry. Last year, Celent, an international strategy
consultancy dedicated to helping financial firms create and sustain competitive
advantage, released a survey of some 900 independent agents who were asked three
things: What do agents want from carriers in services and technology? If given an
equal or almost equal price, what factors matter the most to agents when they place
business? How are the investments by carriers in agent technologies making a bottom-
line difference in agencies?

The surveys authors, Mike Fitzgerald and Craig Weber, note that typically four
carriers represent 75% of an agents book of business. There is no free lunch in the
competition space, they say. The survey also found that agency management systems
and carrier proprietary Web sites are the most frequently used technologies. Document
imaging is on the rise but still under-utilized, the survey says. Celent believes
independent agents have progressed in their use of newer technology tools, but
carriers need to prime the pump in specific areas such as mobile technology, the
surveys authors note.
The authors say the good news is that 39% of the agents surveyed are very satisfied
with the technology delivered by their best carriers. However, 50% rated their comfort
level as somewhat satisfied, which argues that not all needs are being fully met and
that there is opportunity for differentiation.

Regarding carrier choice drivers, the survey found that the elements that were ranked
as the top determinants of an agents selection of carriers are: providing outstanding
service to my clients, having a good relationship with underwriter, and issuing
underwriting decisions quickly. All these were ranked as very important by the
vast majority of respondents.

Say the survey authors: Celent urges carriers to incorporate an understanding of

carrier choice drivers into their distribution technology and strategies. We believe that,
for most carriers, this means:

Obtaining a clearer understanding of what their producers sell and how they sell it.

Aggressively pursuing producer feedback to confirm that pricing, product,

technology and service strategies are having the intended effect on sales.

Continuing to focus on execution, which is where many carriers with similar

intentions are differentiated.

Also tackling the issue of agent satisfaction with carriers periodically is the
Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of New York (IIABNY). In its 2009 index,
IIABNY found that property and casualty insurance companies grew more popular
with their agents during the first half of the year. The 2009 industry index showed that
approval ratings for companies doing business in New York rose by 3.6 points for
commercial insurance and 1.7 points for personal insurance over the winter 2008
results. More than 200 different agencies across the state participated in the survey,
which was administered by the consulting firm of Vincent McCabe, Inc.

So-called super regional companies (those that write insurance in multiple states but
do not operate nationally) saw the greatest gains, increasing 6.3 points in commercial
insurance and 4.3 points in personal insurance. Smaller regional companies also
improved by 1.1 points in commercial insurance and 2.3 points in personal. Large
national companies gained 1.5 in commercial but declined slightly in personal.

For the first time since the inception of the IIABNY Industry Index, we saw
improvement in nearly every category, says Kathy Weinheimer, CPCU, AAI,
IBANYs senior vice president of industry relations and education. Insurance
companies have worked hard to improve their agent experience, and these results
show their efforts are paying off. In particular, agents gave their companies high
marks for the responsiveness and quality of relationships with company field
personnel. They also generally approved of the fairness of agency compensation
agreements, with scores rising in this regard for both commercial and personal.

The IIABNY Insurance Industry Index is composed entirely of ratings from agency
principals or leaders responsible for company relations in the state of New York.