You are on page 1of 8

IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development| Vol.

4, Issue 05, 2016 | ISSN (online): 2321-0613

Seismic Analysis and Design of Steel Framed Multi-Storied Building
Sandesh v. Binak1 G.B Bhaskar2
M.Tech. Student 2Assistant Professor
Department of Civil Engineering
G.H. Raisoni Academy of Engineering & Technology, Nagpur
Abstract— Earthquakes are the natural hazard under which and thereby a disaster is avoided. So, below the
the disasters are mainly caused by damage to or collapse of earthquake resistant design philosophy may be summarized
building. So for new construction it is necessary to establish in Table 1.
earthquake resistant regulations and their implementation is Non
Ground Structural
the critical safeguard against earthquake induced damage. Collapse Structural
Shaking Damage
Depending on the conditions different design base shear Damage
calculation format given in IS 1893:2002, Eurocode 8. Strong A NA A
These formats are applied to a multi-storied steel frame Moderate L NA S
building and using Equivalent Static Analysis approach base Minor NA NA NA
shear are calculated and compared. According to IS Table 1: Earthquake Design Philosophies
800:2007 Elastic Analysis and Design of steel structure are A – Acceptable
suggested. Eurocode 3 also has given limit state design L – Limited
approach for the design of steel structure. Design of multi- S – Sustainable
storied steel frame building has been carried out for elastic NA – Not Allowed
analysis as per IS 800 2007 and for plastic analysis as per IS a) Under minor but frequent shaking, the main
800 1984. Similarly the multi-storied steel frame building member of the building that carry vertical and
has been designed by Eurocode 3 and Eurocode 4 mentioned horizontal forces should not be damaged; however
procedures. The design consists of design of beam, column, building parts that do not carry load may sustain
connection, gusseted base plate and seismic design of the repairable damage.
beam-to-column joint panel zone. All the checks are shown b) Under moderate but occasional shaking, the main
according to requirement of seismic codes respectively. members may sustain repairable damage, while the
Key words: steel frame building, other parts of the building may be damaged such
that they may even have to be replaced after the
I. INTRODUCTION earthquake.
Earthquakes are the natural hazard under which disaster are c) Under strong but rare shaking, the main member
mainly caused by damage to or collapse of building and may sustain severe (even irreparable) damage, but the
other man made structure. So its prevention for collapse of building should not collapse.
building or reduction in loss of life is also in our hand. The Thus, after minor shaking, the building will be
primary objective of earthquake resistant design is to fully operational within a short time and the repair costs will
prevent building collapse during earthquakes thus be small. And, after moderate shaking, the building will be
minimizing the risk of death or injury to people in or around operational once the repair and strengthening of the
those buildings. Because damaging earthquakes are rare, damaged main members is completed. But, after a strong
economics dictate that damage to buildings is earthquake, the building may become dysfunctional for
expected and acceptable provided collapse is avoided. further use, but will stand so that people can be evacuated
Experience has shown that for new construction; establish and property recovered.
earthquake resistant regulation and their implementation is B. Design Methodology
the critical safeguard against earthquake induced damage.
As regards existing structure, it is necessary to evaluate and Depending on the characteristic value of the material
strengthen them based on evaluation criteria before an strength and usefulness the design are classified as follows.
earthquake. C. Limit state design
Urbanization has led to a dramatic increase in the For ensuring the design objectives, the design should be
number and variety of high-rise building structures. The based on characteristic value of material strengths and
seismic vulnerability of these high-rise infrastructures is applied loads (action), which take in to account the
poorly understood and probabilistic assessment tools of their probability of variations in the material strengths and in the
performance is lacking. loads to be supported. The limit state method is based on
A. Earthquake Design Philosophy any choose limit of structural usefulness. The limit can be
The engineers do not attempt to make earthquake proof attainment of yield point stress, brittle fracture, fatigue,
buildings that will not get damaged even during the instability, deflection or maximum plastic Strength. Thus
rare but strong earthquake, instead, the engineering the strength of member depends on the criteria of design
intention is to make buildings earthquake resistant such adopted. The design values are derived from the
buildings resist the effects of ground shaking, although characteristic values through the use of partial safety
they may get damaged severely but would not collapse factors, both for material strengths and for loads.
during the strong earthquake. Thus, safety of people Reliability of design is ensuring by requiring that
and contents is assured in earthquake-resistant buildings, Design action  Design strength

All rights reserved by 426
Seismic Analysis and Design of Steel Framed Multi-Storied Building
(IJSRD/Vol. 4/Issue 05/2016/106)

Limit state are the states beyond which the
structure has no longer satisfied the performance
requirements specified. The limit states are classified as,
1) Limit state of strength
Limit state of strength are those associated with failure
under the action of probable and most unfavorable
combinations of load on the structure using the
appropriate partial safety factor, which may endanger the
safety of life and property.
2) Limit strength of serviceability
It includes deformation and deflection, which may adversely
affect the appearance or effective use of structure. Vibration
of the structure of any of its components causing discomfort Fig. 1: Plan of multi storey building
to people, damage to the structure, its contents, of
which may limits its structural effectiveness.
D. Plastic Design
Steel has unique physical property, ductility, because of
which it is able to absorb large deformation beyond the
elastic limit without fracture. Due to this property steel
possesses a reserve of strength beyond its yield which tries
to utilize in the plastic method of design. Plastic design is an
aspect of limit design that extends the structural usefulness
up to the plastic strength or Ultimate load carrying. In
plastic ultimate strength is the criteria rather than yield stress
hence behavior of member beyond the yield stress in the
inelastic (or plastic) range is considered.
Fig. 2: Elevation of multi-storey building
A. Overview
Building seismic codes have given different seismic format
for the calculation of design seismic forces and different
seismic force distribution along the height of the structure.
These formats are discussed in this chapter. According to
that these formats are applied to the multi-storey 3D frame
and the seismic acceleration coefficients and design seismic
forces are compared along the height of the frame.
B. Details of the Building
An example from Proposed Draft for IS 1893 (Part 1),
explanatory examples of Provisions on Seismic Design of
Buildings is considered3.
The details of the building are shown below.
Four storey steel framed office building is
considered. Building is located in Shilong (seismic zone Fig. 3: Sections used for modeling the building
V).The soil conditions are hard. The steel frames are infilled 1) Columns
with brick masonry. The floors are catering for a live load of For limit state design ISHB 350
3kN/m2 on floors and 1.5 kN/m2 on the roof. (Spacing) S = 300 mm
C. Data for Load Calculation For plastic design ISWB 600
(Spacing) S = 400 mm
Floor Finish (roof) = 2.5 kN/m
2) Beam
Floor Finish (floor) = 1 kN/m
For limit state design ISMB 400
Live Load (roof) = 1.5 kN/m
For plastic design ISMB 500
Live Load (floor) = 3 kN/m
Density of Concrete = 25 kN/m3
Slab Thickness = 125 mm
Density of Brickwork = 20 kN/m3

All rights reserved by 427
Seismic Analysis and Design of Steel Framed Multi-Storied Building
(IJSRD/Vol. 4/Issue 05/2016/106)

G. Seismic Weight Calculations
Seismic weight of the frame of Figure is calculated
Slab Parape Brick Col Lo
ve LL Beam
+_ FF t Wall Wall umn ad
(0.12× (1×70 (155×2 (1.5×0. (31×5 1.6×
Ro 15×20 ×0.115 0×0.23 25×15 ×0.85 2×
of ×25) = ×20) = ×1.6) = ×20) = 25) = 1.01
900 161 1141 112.5 132 73)
= 33
(155×2 (3×0.2
Fig. 4: Sections used for modeling the building Th 0×0.23 5×15×
900 - 132 65 52.
ird ×3.2) = 20) =
D. Other Necessary Details 84
2282 225
2.Self wt. of ISMB 500 = Se 34
1.Slab 120 mm thick co 900 - 2282 225 132 65 52.
0.8525 kN/m
nd 84
3.Floor Finish 1 4.Self wt. of ISMB 550 = (155×2
kN/m2 1.0173 kN/m Fir 0×0.23 75
5.Live Load (Roof) 6.Density of concrete 25 900 - 225 132 23.
st ×3.7) =
1.5 kN/m2 kN/m3 06
7.Live Load (Floors) 3 8.Density of concrete 20 13
kN/m2 kN/m3 Total seismic weight of building 52
Table 2: 6
Table 3: Seismic Weight Calculation
E. Model Used For Analysis in STAAD Pro Equivalent static analysis (As per IS1893:2002)
Seismic details for IS1893:2002
Importance Factor : 1.0
Response reduction Factor : 5.0
Zone : V
Type of Soil : Hard
Damping in Steel Structure : 2%
Table 4: Seismic details
H. Design base shear
The horizontal acceleration coefficient is given by,
Ah    a
2 R g
Consider a panel with brick infilled walls the time period is
calculated as,
0 . 09 h 0 . 09  13 . 8
T    0 . 2777 sec
Fig. 5: d 20
F. Modeling Steps Used For Analysis in STAAD Pro For the calculated time period the spectral acceleration
coefficient is, for 2% damping multiplying factor=1.4
Model is prepared in STAAD Pro software. The building is
three dimensional multi-storied structure with four bays in  2 .5  1 .4  3 .5
X direction and three bays in Y direction. The building is g
with different column height i.e. 4.2 m for ground level Therefore the horizontal acceleration coefficient is,
and 3.2 m for rest above storeys. Steel sections are used to 0 . 36 1
model the building. Internal column is provided the higher Ah    3 . 5  0 . 126
section as compared to the other columns. Beams are 2 5
provided same section for the whole building. Dead load, Design base shear
live load and earthquake loads are applied. Earthquake V B  Ah  W
loads are calculated using Equivalent Static Analysis and
applied directly as the nodal forces on each node of each V B  0 .126  13526
storey by dividing the storey shear with the number of V B  1704 kN
nodes of each storey. Then analysis is performed and the
maximum forces are obtained from summary and designed I. Distribution along the Height
for various International codes.

All rights reserved by 428
Seismic Analysis and Design of Steel Framed Multi-Storied Building
(IJSRD/Vol. 4/Issue 05/2016/106)

Distribution of base shear along the storey height for
IS1893:2002(Part1) is given as follows TC is given in Table 3 or Table5 of Eurocode-8;
Distribution of forces along the height of building b) They meet the criteria for regularity in elevation
2 Store given in of Eurocode-8.
Storey w i hi y Base shear force
Level Wt. Wihi2
wh Shear The seismic base shear force ‘Fb’, for each
(m) i i
(kN) (Qi) horizontal direction in which the building is analyzed, shall
be determined using the following expression
2896.9 551689.4
0.46 787 Fb  S d (T1 ) m 
3452.8 Where,
Third 10.6 387961.1 0.32 554
4 Sd (T1) = the ordinate of the design spectrum (see
Secon 3452.8 189077.5 8) at period T1;
7.4 0.16 270
d 4 2
m = the total mass of the building, above the
3723.0 65674.77
First 4.2 0.05 94 foundation or above the top of a rigid basement.
6 8
 = the correction factor, the value of which is 
 1194402.
8  1704 = 0.85 if T1 < 2 TC and the building has more than two
storey’s, or  = 1.0 otherwise
Table 5: Design Guidelines given by Eurocode-8 T1 = the fundamental period of vibration of the
J. Importance Classes for Buildings building for lateral motion in the direction considered.
In Eurocode-8 all categories of buildings are divided into For buildings with heights of up to 40 m the value
four groups according to its purpose and function. For each of T1 (in Sec) may be approximated by the following
seismic use group a seismic factor or importance factor is expression
given. In IS1893-2002 (Part 1) also the importance T1  C t H 4

factors are given for buildings according to function and
importance. The importance classes and importance factor as Where, Ct = 0.085 for moment resistant space steel
given by Eurocode-8 is presented. frames, 0.075 for moment resistant space concrete frames
and for eccentrically braced steel frames and 0.050 for all
K. Importance Classes of Building other structures.
Importance Seismic H = the height of the building, in m, from the
Building foundation or from the top of a rigid basement.
Class factor(γI)
Building of minor importance The value of the damping correction factor η may
I for public safety ,e.g. 0.8 be determined by the expression
agricultural building 10
Ordinary building not    0 . 55
II belonging in the other 1.0
categories. Where,
Building whose seismic ξ = the viscous damping ratio of the structure, expressed as a
resistance is of importance in percentage which is 2% for steel structure.
view of the consequences 2) Distribution of the horizontal seismic forces
III 1.2 The seismic action effects shall be determined by
associated with the collapse
,e.g. school .assembly hall, applying, to the two planar models, horizontal forces Fi to
Cultural institutions etc. all storey.
Building whose integrity Z imi
Fi  Fb
 Z imi
during earthquake is of vital
IV importance for civil 1.4
protection, e.g. hospitals, fire Where,
stations, power plants, etc. Zi, Zj = the heights of the masses mi, mj above the level of
Table 6: application of the seismic action (foundation or top of a
rigid basement)
L. Lateral Force Method of Analysis Equivalent static analysis (EC-8)
1) Limitations Seismic details for EC-8
The requirement is deemed to be satisfied in a building Seismic details
which fulfils both of the two following conditions. Importance Factor : 1.0 (Class II)
a) They have fundamental periods of vibration T1 in Behavior factor : 6.0
the two main directions which are smaller than the following PGA : 0.36g
values Type of Soil : Type A (Rock)
 4T C Damping in Steel Structure : 2%
T1   Table 7:
 2 .0 s M. Design base shear calculation
Where, The seismic base shear force Fb, is given as follows:

All rights reserved by 429
Seismic Analysis and Design of Steel Framed Multi-Storied Building
(IJSRD/Vol. 4/Issue 05/2016/106)

Fb  S d (T1 ) m  4th
0.34 703
92 .5
From equation above,
3452. 36600
3 3rd 10.6 0.31 643
T1  0 .05  13 .8 4 84 .1
3452. 25551
T1  0 . 358 sec 2nd
0.22 443
Sd (T1) can be determined from the design 3723. 15636
response spectrum ( of EC-8. From the Table 7 (EC- 1st 4.2 0.13 275
06 .85
8) the parameter governing the recommended elastic
response spectra (Refer Table 8)  11776
 2069
Ground Type S TB (sec) TC (sec) TC (sec)
A 1.00 0.15 0.40 2.00 Table 9: Distribution of forces along the height of building.
B 1.20 0.15 0.50 2.00 O. Comparison of Horizontal Seismic Acceleration and
C 1.15 0.20 0.60 2.00 Seismic Base Shear
D 1.35 0.20 0.80 2.00
The calculated seismic acceleration coefficient and seismic
E 1.40 0.15 0.50 2.00
base shear in sections 3.3.4, 3.3.5 and 3.3.6 are as shown in
Table 8: Value of parameter describing elastic response
Table 10.
From design response spectrum for ground type A P. Comparison of Acceleration and Base Shear
2 .5 IS Euro Code 8
T B  T  T C : S d (T )  a g  S  1893:2002 2003
Natural Period 0.2777 sec 0.358 sec
According to clause
Horizontal Seismic
values of the behavior factor q, which also account for the 0.126 0.153
influence of the viscous damping being different from 5%,
are given for various materials and structural systems Design Base Shear 1704 kN 2069 KN
according to the relevant ductility classes. 4th 787 kN 703 kN
3rd 554 kN 643 kN
S d (T ) 2 .5 Storey Shear
 0 . 36  1  2nd 270 kN 443 kN
g 5 1st 94 kN 275 kN
S d (T ) Table 10:
 0 . 18 Q. Design of Panel Zone
Now, the seismic base shear force Fb, is given by 1) Loads on panel zone
From column
Fb  S d (T )  m   Top:-
S d (T ) Bottom:- Axial force Nc1 = 326 kN
Fb  mg Axial force Nc2 = 764 kN
g Moment Mc1 = 89 kN-m
F b  S d (T )  W   Moment Mc2 = 190 kN-m
Shear force Vc1 = 95 kN
Fb  0 .18  13526  0 .85 Shear force Vc2 = 143 kN
  0 . 85 From beam
Fb  2069 kN Right:-
m Moment Mbl = 215 kN-m
Also, Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = Moment Mbr = 215 kN-m
Fb Shear force Vbl = 133 kN
m 2069 Shear force Vbr = 133 kN
 2) Properties of Section
Fb 13526
Properties of column 2 ISHB450 and beam ISMB 450 are,
m Overall depth of column section dc = 450 mm
Ah   0.153 Overall depth of beam section db = 450 mm
Thickness of column flange tc f = 13.7 mm
N. Distribution along The Height Thickness of beam flange tbf = 13.7 mm
Moment of inertia of column section Ixx = 740437000 mm4
Distribution of base shear along the storey height for
Area of column section A = 22228 mm2
Eurocode-8 is given as follows
Average of storey height H = 3200 mm
(Refer Table 9)
3) Calculation of Axial Force and Resisting Moments
zi  m i Axial force in column
FLO W h Storey Shear
OR (kN) (m)
zimi  z i  m i (kN) N 
764  326
 438 kN

All rights reserved by 430
Seismic Analysis and Design of Steel Framed Multi-Storied Building
(IJSRD/Vol. 4/Issue 05/2016/106)

Squash load load combinations. Then the design of steel frame is carried
250  22228 out according to IS 800 2007.
Ny   5557 kN
1000 B. General Design Procedure
Summation of resisting moments in beam a) According to section steps for the design of beam and
M R ,b
 215  215  430 kN-m column are as follows
b) Determine possible loading conditions
4) Shear Force in the Columns c) Compute the factored design load combinations
The shear force in the column evaluated by assuming that d) Member subjected to bending shall be checked for
the zero moment point is located in the middle section of  Class of the section
columns is,
 Adequacy of section
Vc 
M c

89  190
 101455 N
 Shear strength of section
H  db 3200  450  Design capacity of section
 Check for deflection
5) Shear Force in Panel Zone
e) Member subjected to combines axial force and bending
Vp 
M b
 Vc
moment shall be checked for
d  t bf   Check for bi-axial bending
 Check for buckling resistance
215  215   10 6
Vp   101455  884106 N C. Load Combinations
450  13 .7  Load combinations according to the Eurocode
6) Thickness of Panel Zone recommendations are as follows
Under the assumption that the shear stress is uniformly 1) 1.5(DL+LL)
distributed in the panel zone, the shear stress develop with in 2) 1.2(DL+LL+EQX)
the panel zone is given by, 3) 1.2(DL+LL-EQX)
Vp 4) 1.2(DL+LL+EQY)
p  5) 1.2(DL+LL-EQY)
d c  2 t cf t p 6) 1.5(DL+EQX)
The average shear stress in the panel zone is given by 7) 1.5(DL-EQX)
8) 1.5(DL+EQY)
p 
M b 
1 
d b  t bf 

9) 1.5(DL-EQY)
tp d  2 t d
c cf b
 t bf   H  db 

10) 0.9DL+1.5EQX
11) 0.9DL-1.5EQX
In order to assume that yielding occurs in the beam 12) 0.9DL+1.5EQY
rather than the panel zone according to the von Mises yield 13) 0.9DL-1.5EQY
criterion, the following condition has to be satisfied.
D. Analysis Results
  N  
The building is analyzed in STAAD Pro2006 for the dead,
 d b  t bf  
R ,b
1   1   live and seismic loads and the results of maximum axial
t p d c  2 t cf d   H  d b  y 
 t bf   N   forces, bending moment and shear forces are used for the
b    y  
design of members.
This provides the design value tp of the panel zone
thickness, including doublers plates, IV. COMPARATIVE STUDY
tp 
1 M R ,b 
1 
d b  t bf 
 The comparative study is carried out from the seismic
d  2 t d  t bf  H  db
 
 design of steel frame by using IS1893:2002 and Eurocode-8.
  N  
2 2 c cf b

   The governing parameters and results for seismic design are
y 1
  N  
 y  
shown in Table 11.

1 884106 mm No Description IS1893:2002 EUROCODE-8
tp   14 . 54
450  2  13 . 7  .
  438  
2 2

144  1    Horizontal Z I S S (T )
  5557   acceleratio Ah    a Fb  d 1  
 1
n 2 R g g
Required thickness of panel zone is 14.54 mm; therefore the
actual thickness is more and hence safe. coefficient
Design V B  Ah  W Fb  S d (T1 ) m 
shear(kN) 1704 kN 2069 kN
A. Introduction to IS 800:2007 Base shear
distribution 2 Z imi
In this chapter the frame is analyzed for the seismic forces w i hi Fi  Fb
calculated from the equivalent static analysis using IS 1893
2002 (Part 1).Bending moment and shear forces are
3 along the
building  w i hi
2  Z imi
calculated using STAAD Pro-2006 as per the IS 800 2007 height

All rights reserved by 431
Seismic Analysis and Design of Steel Framed Multi-Storied Building
(IJSRD/Vol. 4/Issue 05/2016/106)

4th 787 kN 703 kN 4) Time period calculated from EC 8 is more than IS 1893
3rd 554 kN 643 kN 2002 (Part 1)
Storey 5) Seismic forces along the storey height are distributed in
4 2n
Shear d 270 kN 443 kN parabolic curvature in IS 1893 2002 (Part 1) instead in
1 st
94 kN 275 kN linear way in the EC 8. So IS 1893 2002 (Part 1) gives
Time well distributed forces along the height as compared to
0 . 09 h 3
period of T  T1  C t H 4 EC 8.
5 d 6) Plastic design method is a part of limit state design
(Sec) 0.277 sec 0.358 sec which uses the full strength of the material used.

η = 1 for 5% 10 B. Scope for Future Work
viscous damping
   0 . 55 In the present study the analysis and design of a four storey
Factor(η) 5
η = 1.4 for 2% 3D frame has been carried out for different codes like IS
1893-2002 (part 1), IS 800-1984 and IS 800-2007, EURO
Zone factor Zone V (Z=0.36) PGA=0.36g CODE 8, EURO CODE 3, EURO CODE 4. The same study
7 can be extended by using different code for concentric
q=f(material, braced frames, eccentric braced frames.
Response R=5(Special
reduction moment resisting
8 q=5αu/α1=6(SMR
factor frame) [1] Daniel Grecea, Florea Dinu, Dan Dubina (2004)
frame) “Performance criteria for MR steel frames in seismic
Important Class I=0.8 zones” Journal of Constructional Steel Research vol. 60
Importance building(I)=1.5 Class II=1.0 pg. 739–749
factor(I) Other Class III=1.2 [2] Naoki Satake & Haruhiko Yokota (1996), “Evaluation
building(I)=1.0 Class IV=1.4 of vibration properties of high-rise steel buildings using
data of vibration tests and earthquake observations”
column  M C
 1 .2
 M rc
 1 .3
Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial
Aerodynamics vol. 59 pg. 265-282
 MB  M rb [3] Problem adopted from Jain S. K (July 1995), ”A
Proposed Draft for IS:1893 Provisions on Seismic
1.5(DL+LL) Design of Buildings; Part II: Commentary and
Load 1.35Gk+1.05Qk ±
1.2(DL+LL±EQ) Examples”, Journal of structural Engineering, Vol. 22,
11 Combinatio 1.5EL
1.5(DL±EQ) pg. 73-90
n Gk=dead load
0.9DL±1.5EQ [4] Robert Levy, Eduard Marianchik, Avigdor Rutenberg &
Qk=live load
Fred Segal (2001), “A simple approach to the seismic
0.004h 0.005h
design of friction damped braced medium-rise frames”,
Storey drift h=height of h=height of
Engineering Structures vol. 23 pg. 250–259
12 limitation building building
[5] Sid Ahmed Meftah, Abdelouahed Tounsi & Adda Bedia
0.0552 m 0.069 m El Abbas (2007), “A simplified approach for seismic
Limit State calculation of a tall building braced by shear walls and
Design Limit State Design
Design thin-walled open section structures ” Engineering
13 Methodolo Design Action ≤
Design Action ≤ Structures vol. 29 pg. 2576–2585
gy Design Strength
Design Strength [6] Qiang Xue & Chia-Wei Wu (2005) “Preliminary
Table 11: Comparisons detailing for displacement-based seismic design of
buildings” Engineering Structures vol. 28 pg. 431–440.
V. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE [7] N. Subramanian, “Design of steel structures“, Oxford
A. General University press 2008
[8] F. M. Mazzolani, V. Piluso, “Theory and Design of
The following conclusions are drawn from the analysis and
Seismic Resistant Steel Frames“, Chapman Hall India.
design of steel framed multi-storied building for IS 1893-
[9] Federico M. Mozzolani “Moment resistant connection
2002 (part 1), IS 800-1984, IS 800-2007, EURO CODE 8,
of steel frames in seismic areas (Design and
reliability)”, E and FN Spon, Landon.
1) Design criterion for IS 800-2007, EC 3 and EC 4 is
[10] Cem Topkaya & Can Ozan Kurban (2009) “Natural
periods of steel plate shear wall systems “Journal of
2) Composite beam and column requires smaller sections
Constructional Steel Research Vol. 65, pg. 542–551
as compared to normal steel beam column i.e. very
[11] Gautam Mondal and Sudhir K.Jain (2005) “Design of
economical and also reduced dead loads.
non-structural element for buildings: A review of codal
3) The behavior of structure depends on the time period of
provisions” Indian Concrete Journal, August 2005, pp
the structure. Hence the distribution of the seismic
forces along the storey height can be done according to
[12] D.A. Nethercot , L. Gardner(2005),“The EC3 approach
the time period of the structure.
to the design of columns, beams and beam-columns”

All rights reserved by 432
Seismic Analysis and Design of Steel Framed Multi-Storied Building
(IJSRD/Vol. 4/Issue 05/2016/106)

Journal of Steel and composite structures,Vol.5, No.2-3,
pp 127-140.
[13] Sudip Paul, C.V.R. Murty, Sudhir K. Jain(2000),”State-
of-the art review of seismic design of steel moment
resisting frames-Part I: General considerations and
stability provisions” Journal of structural engineering,
Vol.27, No.1, April 2000, pp.23-32.
[14] Sudip Paul, C.V.R. Murty , Sudhir K.
Jain,(2000)“State-of-the art review of seismic design
of steel moment resisting frames-Part I: Strength
and Drift criteria” Vol.27, No.2, pp.117-124
[15] BIS, “Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant
Design of Structures: Part 1 General Provisions and
Buildings”,IS 1893 (Part 1):2002, Bureau of Indian
Standards, New Delhi.
[16] BIS, “Indian Standard Criteria for general construction
in steel Structures”, IS 800:1984, Bureau of Indian
Standards, New Delhi
[17] EC8 ENV 1998-1-3, “Design of structures for
Earthquake Resistance – Part 1-3: General Rules –
Seismic action and rules for building”, Eurocode-8,
European Committee for Standardization, Brussels,
[18] EC3 ENV 1993-1-1, “Design of steel structures– Part
1-1: General Rules and rules for building”, Eurocode-
3, British Standards, 1992.

All rights reserved by 433